Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 3/6/2008REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: SUBJECT: DATE: (14,U►') 6 2 J IN FAVOR: ❑ r3 �� NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Name:. Representing: it Address: City: /v` Telephone No: Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO MARCH 6, 2008, 7:00 p.m. Tie. COUNCIL: 2045 South San Jacinto 'Avenue San Jacinto Unified, School District Board Room, San; Jacinto,`CA .92583 RGANIZATION 1 Call to Order 2 ' .Roll Call 3 Invocation. 4 Pledge of Allegiance 5 Special Presentations! PUBLIC COMMENTS; Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda. :A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the City Council, 2.1 City Manager's Report of previous month's public comments / City, Manager CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar:are considered routine and will be enacted byone motion by City Council Members in the form listed: There will be' no separate discussionon these. items prior to the'motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed.: if an item is; pulled, it Will be heard at the end: of number 5. ,Staff Reports.' 3.1 Treasurer's Report at January 31, 2008 / Receive and !File,/:Interim Finance Director,.. Continuation :of the: Proclamation of the:Local State of Emergency due high and damaging winds/ Approve / City Attorney Final Parcel Map 31371 City'Engineer a) • Approve final parcel map 33137 b) Authorize mayor to execute final map: c) Authorize city clerk to release the map for recordation Council;Agenda`; March 6, 2008 Page 2 of 4 Park Hill Specific Plan / Pacific Century Homes /` Reimbursement Agreement in the amount of $164,500"to cover the cost of the EIR, management of the applicationof the project and legal fees"/"Approve / Planning Director Professional Services "Agreement with :Michael Sandman Associates (MBA) in the amount of $110,000 for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (:EIR) for the Park Hill Specific Plan proposed for the Park Hill: area in:the southeastern area of the city / Approve / Planning Director Resolution No." . "1 resolution initiating the ordering of the district engineer. to prepare and file a report related to the maintenance of public improvements in the city's LLPD No.-1 for FY 20082009 Property Tax /. Approve: and Adopt / In"terim Finance Director and Special Districts Administrator Resolution -No. - /`A resolution initiating', the ordering of the district engineer; to prepare and file a report related to the maintenance, of public improvements in the city's LLPD No. 2 for FY 2008-2009 Property Tax /Approve and Adopt / Interim Finance Director and Special 'Districts Administrator. lesolution x Reeds Wa / a resolution to approve the. renaming of Tranquilo Cou 1384 / Approve / Assistant City Engineer ublic Hearing Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2:(LLPD:I Annexation.No.:75 (San" Jacinto Unified School District) APNs 435=2 �6;and:435 26I-"010 /City Attorney esolution No / A Resolution initiating proceedings for`the Annexation of property LL:PD No 2 Annexation No 75 Approv and Adopt ). ResolutionResolution approving"the Engineer's Report for Annexation o. 75 into LLPD No 2''/:Approve and Adopt; Resolution No /.A Resolution declaringintention.to annex proper : into LLP,D No. 2` Annexation :No 75:/. Approve,and iAdo.pt ► : Public Hearing %At the=conclusion of,"the public hearing if the City . determines thataa majority protest does not; exist, :by, motion;approve certification ofthe election results for adding:certain property into ` :; City Council Agenda- March 6, 2008 facie 3'of4:.: LLPD No 2 known as. Annexation No: 75 / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. / A Resolution ordering annexation of territory into LLPD No. 2 and levying assessments STAFF; REPORTS At the end of the scheduled City Department items, anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor; ;state their naive, address, and the. consent: calendar item number pulled. Speakers should limit comments to three (3)-minutes. SB 621 Indian Gaming Impact Grant / Appropriation of $304,396.46from SB 621 Indian Gaming Grant Fund for the Police Station Expansion Projec / Approve / Chief of Police JIAYOR I COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS !'DISCUSSIONS LOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS California Government Code Section 549568: Property: Sanderson Avenue Widening Project (All properties are located along Sanderson Avenue, between Ramona Expressway and Esplanade) Agency Negotiator Jeff Ballinger, City Attorney Property and Corresponding Negotiating Parties: DBN West Esplanade Co: (APNs 431-190-010, 431-190-011 NW. corner of Sanderson Avenue and Esplande Avenue, 1450 S. Sanderson Avenue), Walter Ray Greenman and Jean Greenman Trust (APN 431-190-012 - West side of Sanderson Avenue 960' North of Esplanade); Wendell J. Burson and Janet A. Burson Trust (APNs 431-190-013 and. 431-190-014 - 970 and 1070;S. Sanderson Avenue, San Jacinto, west side of Sanderson Avenue 1290' North of Esplanade);:'• Ignacio.Cordero. and Maria de la Plaz Cordero (APNs 431-190-017 and 431-190-018 - SW corner of Sanderson Avenue and 7th Street); Rosalia-Hauser Trust (APN 431-150-016 - NE corner of Sanderson Avenue and 7th:Street); ommonwealth Thrift Bancorp. - Co (APNs 431-150-005 and 431-150-0 W Corner of Sanderson Avenue and 7th Street), San Jacinto Square LLC Co. (APN 431-150-012 —SE corner of Sanderson Avenue and; Cottonwood); Luiten Investment (APN 431-100-038. Vacant frontage on Cottonwood Avenue on NE, corner); tuiten 30, LLC, San Jacinto 3; LLC (APN 431 100 039 — Vacant frontage on cottonwood Avenue); pocky Glen (LC, Glen;Rocky. Co., James R. Rickett {APN 431=110 008:— Anderson°Avenue); inda Susan Williams and Luis B .Herrera (APN 431 100-034 327 N anderson Avenue); ennar Honies of. California, Inc (APNs 43:1-100-26, 431-100-027, 431-10 )37 - Eastside of Sanderson Avenue North of. Cottonwood), &K Osborne, , Robert 'E.:Osborne, :-Robe s Trustees of the R & K Osborne Trust (AR Avenue); Jnder negotiation Price and term JOURNME If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may limited to raising only those issues you or someone else; raised' at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to. the City Council (% the City- Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing CHALLENGE TO'LAND"USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking.to challengea. decision regarding lend use;`; made by the City:Counci;as a result of *Proceeding in which .by law a.hearingis required, to be given, evidence, is required to. be, • Taken; and. "the discretion in the .determinatiofacts n of is 'vested in" he City_ . Council," shall,' be required to commence that action 90 days: following thedate on which thedecision of the pity:Council becomes final as;pr"ovided in Code of Civil, Procedure Section 1094:6.. Please refer; to Code •.. of:Civil Procedure. Section'1094.6to determine how. to calculate: when. a; decision becomes final ' It is .the intention Of the City of San :Jacinto: to,comply: with the Americans with Disabilities' Act (ADA) "in all y' respects IIf,:as an attendee_ or a participant; at OS:meeting or.in"meetings on":a regularbasis, you will.` need; special; assistance. beyond what' is normally" provided," the' City, will'attempt to eccommodate.you in every:"reasonable manner,' Please "contact CI& Hap at (951) "537-6358,,.at least 48 hours prior: to the: meeting to' inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Cferkof the sty ofsanjaceinto, do:here6y verify t(uit I causerfto 6e posted'the of Te6ruaiy,` 2008, as required6y Cctzv orothy, :`'C out izard ciiy Clerk City of San Jacinto City Council Notice of Adjournment Notice is hereby given that the San Jacinto City Council at their March 6, 2008, regular meeting, adjourned (continued) the Public Hearing Item 4.1 regarding Annexation No. 75 into LLPD No. 2 to April 17, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter, to be held at the San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room, 2045 S San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA, San Jacinto, California, 92583 Said continuance was passed by the following vote: Ayes: Carlson, Mansperger, Ritchie Nays: None Absent: Jim Ayres, Dale Stubblefield For further information please contact the City Clerk's office at (951) 487-7339. 9, Dorothy L'. Chouinara City Clerk for the City of San Jacinto, �(o (erehy cert fj that 9 causel to he pastel the foregoing 1 uhhe (eariny continuance this 616 ail o f 7vfarch, 2008, Dorothy .C, houinard city Clerk AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 2008, 7:00 p.m. 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room, San Jacinto, CA 92583 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the City Council. 2.1 City Manager's Report of previous month's public comments / City Manager 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. If an item is pulled, it will be heard at the end of number '5. Staff Reports.' 3.1 Treasurer's Report at January 31, 2008 / Receive and File / Interim Finance Director 3.2 Continuation of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency due to high and damaging winds / Approve / City Attorney 3.3 Final Parcel Map 33137 / City Engineer a) Approve final parcel map 33137 b) Authorize mayor to execute final map c) Authorize city clerk to release the map for recordation City Council Agenda March 6, 2008 Pane 2 of 4 3.4 Park Hill Specific Plan / Pacific Century Homes / Reimbursement Agreement in the amount of $164,500 to cover the cost of the EIR, management of the application of the project and legal fees / Approve / Planning Director 3.5 Professional Services Agreement with Michael Bandman Associates (MBA) in the amount of $110,000 for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Park Hill Specific Plan proposed for the Park Hill area in the southeastern area of the city / Approve / Planning Director 3.6 Resolution No. _ / A resolution initiating the ordering of the district engineer to prepare and file a report related to the maintenance of public improvements in the city's LLPD No. 1 for FY 2008-2009 Property Tax Roll / Approve and Adopt / Interim Finance Director and Special Districts Administrator 3.7 Resolution No. _ / A resolution initiating the ordering of the district engineer to prepare and file a report related to the maintenance of public improvements in the city's LLPD No. 2 for FY 2008-2009 Property Tax Roll / Approve and Adopt / Interim Finance Director and Special Districts Administrator 3.8 Resolution No. _ / a resolution to approve the renaming of Tranquilo Court to Reeds Ways T31384 / Approve / Assistant City Engineer 3.9 Street Banners for Ramona Pageant / Approve appropriation for $2,500 from the General Fund / City Manager 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Public Hearing - Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) Annexation No. 75 (San Jacinto Unified School District) APNs 435-261- 006 and 435-261-010 / City Attorney a) Resolution No. _ / A Resolution initiating proceedings for the Annexation of property into LLPD No 2 — Annexation No. 75 Approve and Adopt b) Resolution No._ / A Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 75 into LLPD No. 2 / Approve and Adopt c) Resolution No. _ / A Resolution declaring intention to annex property into LLPD No. 2 — Annexation No. 75 / Approve and Adopt d) Public Hearing / At the conclusion of the public hearing if the City determines that a majority protest does not exist, by motion approve the certification of the election results for adding certain property into City Council Agenda March 6, 2008 Page 3 of 4 LLPD No 2 known as Annexation No. 75 / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. _ / A Resolution ordering annexation of territory into LLPD No. 2 and levying assessments 5. STAFF REPORTS At the end of the scheduled City Department items, anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor; state their name, address, and the consent calendar item number pulled. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 SB 621 Indian Gaming Impact Grant / Appropriation of $304,396.46 from SB 621 Indian Gaming Grant Fund for the Police Station Expansion Project / Approve / Chief of Police 6. MAYOR I COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS California Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: Sanderson Avenue Widening Project (All properties are located along Sanderson Avenue, between Ramona Expressway and Esplanade) Agency Negotiator: Jeff Ballinger, City Attorney Property and Corresponding Negotiating Parties: • DBN West Esplanade Co. (APNs 431-190-010, 431-190-011 — NW corner of Sanderson Avenue and Esplande Avenue, 1450 S. Sanderson Avenue); • Walter Ray Greenman and Jean Greenman Trust (APN 431-190-012 — West side of Sanderson Avenue 960' North of Esplanade); • Wendell J. Burson and Janet A. Burson Trust (APNs 431-190-013 and 431-190-014 — 970 and 1070 S. Sanderson Avenue, San Jacinto, west side of Sanderson Avenue 1290' North of Esplanade); • Ignacio Cordero and Maria de la Plaz Cordero (APNs 431-190-017 and 431-190-018 — SW corner of Sanderson Avenue and 7th Street); • Rosalia Hauser Trust (APN 431-150-016 — NE corner of Sanderson Avenue and 7th Street); • Commonwealth Thrift Bancorp. Co. (APNs 431-150-005 and 431-150-006 — NW Corner of Sanderson Avenue and 7th Street); • San Jacinto Square LLC Co. (APN 431-150-012 — SE corner of Sanderson Avenue and Cottonwood); City Council Agenda March 6, 2008 Page 4 of 4 • Luiten Investment (APN 431-100-038 — Vacant frontage on Cottonwood Avenue on NE corner); • Luiten 30, LLC, San Jacinto 3, LLC (APN 431-100-039 — Vacant frontage on Cottonwood Avenue); • Rocky Glen LLC, Glen Rocky. Co., James R. Rickett (APN 431-110-008 — 250 N. Anderson Avenue); • Linda Susan Williams and Luis B. Herrera (APN 431-100-034 — 327 N. Sanderson Avenue); • Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (APNs. 431-100-26, 431-100-027, 431-100- 037 — Eastside of Sanderson Avenue North of Cottonwood); • R&K Osborne, Robert E. Osborne, Robert E. Osborne, Jr. and Kelly Osborne, Trustees of the R & K Osborne Trust (APN 431-100-002 — 805 N. Sanderson Avenue); Under negotiation: Price and terms 8. ADJOURNMENT If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing. CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. lf, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (951) 537-6358, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Cferkof tliie City of San Jacinto, do hereby cerqfj, that I caused to 6e posted the foregoing agenda this 29tf clay of 'Te6ruaty, 2008, as required 6y raw. (Dorothy L. Cfiouinard,, City Clerk, AGENDA ITEM 5' I March 6, 2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Connie Rogers -Elmore, Interim Finance Directo VIA: Thomas Prill, General Accounting Manager SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report at January 31, 2008 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Treasurer's Report for January 31, 2008. BACKGROUND: The Treasurer's Report is required to be presented to the governing body at least quarterly in accordance with California Government Code Section 53600 et. seq. DISCUSSION: Total Cash and City Investments increased 7.29% during the month. This includes cash, cash in bank and cash with trustee. The attached Treasurer's report is a "snapshot" report of our cash position on the last day of the month in all of our accounts. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Treasurer's Report for the month ending January 31, 2008. Page ]. INVESTMENT TYPE INSTITUTION SERIAL # INTEREST RATE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING JANUARY 31, 2008 12/31/2007 PURCHASE MATURITY PREY. MONTH YIELD DATE DATE BALANCE 1/31/2008 CURRENT BALANCE % change from prior month 1/31/2008 COMPUTED MARKET ACCRUED VALUE INTEREST STATE POOL CAMP CAMP - Merrill Lynch & Co Inc CAMP - Citigroup Funding Inc CAMP - FHLB Global Notes CAMP - FHLMC Global Notes CAMP - FNMA Disc Note CAMP - FHLMC Disc Note CAMP • FNMA Disc Note CAMP - FNMA Disc Note FIXED RATE CD MONEY MARKET MONEY MARKET DEMAND Account PAYROLL Account IMPREST Account L.A.I.F. Joint Powers Authority 50018JAX2 17307RBS2 31339YGN6 3128X4RC7 313588E198 313396TV5 313588VL6 313588085 PFF Bank Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Cash on Hand TOTAL CITY INVESTMENTS & FUNDS CFD NO2 Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Corporate Obligations Mutua Fund Mutua Fund Mutua Fund Mutua Fund Mutua Fund Mutua Fund Mutua Fund Mutua Fund Mutua Fund Mutua Fund Mutua Fund Trustee Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank 98-33-794 4.620% 578-00 4.820% 578-00 5.359 % 578-00 5.338% 578-00 5.107% 578-00 4.098% 578-00 5.235% 578-00 5.218% 578-00 5.101% 578-00 4.649% 395082233 5.732% 4920600310 1.500% 100005510 2.500% 4918934601 0.000% 4918935401 0.000% 4918936201 0.000% 0.000% 4.719% 4.928% 5.359°! 5.338% 5.107% 4.098% 5.235 5.218% 5.101% 4.649% 5.885% 1,510% 2.529% 0.000°! 0.000°! 0.000% 0.000% RFSTRICTFD CASH WITH FISCAL AGFNT (BOND FUNDS) Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Bayerische Lankhk GIC Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund Blackrock Pray. T-Fund Blackrock Prov. T-Fund TOTAL CFD NO 2 ?005 RDA SAN JACINTO TAX ALLOCATION BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund 1997 WATER IMPROVFMFNT REVFNI F R0Uyf1S Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund 7'007 WATFR RFVFNUE BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund 6711695201 2.040% 6711695202 2.040% 6711695203 2.040% 6711695204 2.040% 6711695204 4.050% 6711695205 2.040% 6711695208 2.040% 6711695301 2.040% 6711695401 2.040% 6711695405 0.000% 6711695406 2.040% 6711695501 2.040% 6711695502 2.040% 6711695503 2.040% 6711695504 2.040% 6711695506 2.040% 671175750X 671159800X 671168290X 2.298% 2.040% 2.040% 2.059% 2.059% 2.059% 2.059% 4.126% 2.059% 2.059% 2.059% 2.059% 0.000% 2.059% 2.059°! 2.059% 2.059% 2.059% 2.059% 2.323% 2.059% 2.059% Various Open Various Open 8/31/2007 1/31/2008 8/31/2007 2/26/2008 2/7/2007 7/15/2008 10/18/2006 9/29/2008 217/2007 1/1 1 /2008 5/24/2007 3/3/2008 4/26/2007 4/11/2008 9/14/2007 8/29/2008 11/9/2007 5/9/2008 Various Open Various Open Various Open Various Open Various Open Various n/a Various Various Various Various 10/10/2002 Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Open Open Open Open 9/1/2014 Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open $31,817,800 $6,694,649 $2,588,647 $2,578,969 8999,085 $4,059,132 $1,997,228 $495,684 $1,972,730 $1,940,419 $1,007,483 S94,080 $4,281,594 $675,528 $152,406 $2,310 $1,010 $32,213,426 $11,335,953 $0 $2,590,611 $990,141 $4,072,903 $0 $497,842 $1,981,100 $1,948,083 $1,007,483 $94,217 $7,375,222 $855,866 $37,602 $0 $1,010 1.24% 69.33% -100.00% 0.45% -0.90% 0.34% -100.00 % 0.44% 0.42% 0.39% 0.00% 0.15% 72.25 % 26.70% -75.33 % -100.00 % 0.00% $32,339,075 S125,649 $11,335,953 n/a $0 $0 $2,594,236 $0 $999,063 $1,167 $4,056,544 $54,889 $0 $0 $498,779 $0 $1,989,223 $0 $1,969,351 $0 $1,007,483 $7,483 $94,217 n/a $7,375,222 n/a $855,866 n/a $37,602 n/a $0 n/a $1,010 n/a $61,358,754 $65,001,459 5.94% $65,153,624 $189,188 $1,120 S0 $4 S15,707 $748,800 $45,249 $262 $220 $2,860 $141,868 $4,958 $865 $29 $28 $1 $154,270 $1,116,241 $5,010,601 $231,933 $110 $120,289 $0 $4 $15,753 $748,800 $45,381 $262 $221 $614,031 $142,284 $4,973 $868 $29 $28 $1 $154,723 10640.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00% 0.29% 0.00% 0.45% 21369.62% 0.29% 0.30% 0.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% $1,847,647 65.52% $5,630,884 12.38% $232,613 0.29% $111 0.91% 8120,289 $0 $4 $15,753 8748,800 $45,381 $262 $221 $614,031 $142,284 $4,973 $868 $29 $28 $1 $154,723 $1,847,647 $5,630,884 $232,613 $111 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Prepared By: General Accounting Manager Page 2 TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING JANUARY 31, 2008 12/31/2007 1/31/2008 % change 1/31/2008 COMPUTED INVESTMENT INSTITUTION INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PREY. MONTH CURRENT from prior MARKET ACCRUED TYPE SERIAL # RATE YIELD DATE DATE BALANCE BALANCE month VALUE INTEREST 1999 RDA SOBOBA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund 671162740X 2.040% 2.059% Various Open $91,480 S91,748 0.29% S91,748 n/a ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 87-1 Cash BNY Bank of New York 411795 0.000% 0.000% Various Open 5916 S916 0.00% S916 n/a RCTC LOAN Money Market USB US Bank 95444672 0.000% 0.000% Various Open SO $0 0.00% $0 n/a SUNTRUST LEASING ESCROW STIF & Money Market ST SunTrust 792198X 2.720% 2.754% Various Open $768,746 $770,866 0.28% S770,866 n/a TOTAL CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT $7,220,027 $8,574,785 18.76% $8,574,785 n/a TOTAL ALL FUNDS $68,578,781 I CERTIFY THAT THESE INVESTMENTS COMPLY WITH ALL STATE LAWS PERTAINING TO THE INVESTMENT OF LOCAL AGENCY FUNDS AND THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO'S INVESTMENT POLICIES. CITY OF SAN JACINTO MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SIX MONTH CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS AS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 53646(b113) JAMES W. POTTS, TREASURER City of San Jacinto $73,576,244 7.29% $73,728,409 $189,188 Prepared By: General Accounting Manager AGENDA ITEM Jam. March 6, 2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Continuance of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency due to the Severe High and Damaging Winds RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve the continuance of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency due to the Severe High and Damaging Winds. DISCUSSION: On October 26, 2007, the City Council approved Resolution No. 3117 proclaiming and ratifying the existence of a local emergency, as issued by the Director of Emergency Services/City Manager and resulting from the extreme high and damaging winds that began on or about 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on October 21, 2007. Government Code section 8630 requires the City Council to review, at its regularly scheduled meetings until the local emergency is terminated, the need for continuing the local emergency. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Consent to the continuance of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency (Staff Recommendation). 2) Do Not Consent to the continuance. FISCAL IMPACT: The City's ability to obtain or continue to receive federal, state or regional disaster/emergency relief funding may be impacted if the City Council does not Consent to continue the proclamation of the local state of emergency. Substantial budgetary impacts are apparent for recovery efforts to include substantial employee overtime salaries; purchases of materials, supplies and equipment; use of private contractors/force labor; and other repairs to city right-of-way facilities (Preliminary estimates range from thirty five to fifty thousand dollars). Budgetary assistance and reimbursement is available from Federal Emergency Management Agency (F.E.M.A.) for related costs for limited recovery efforts to critical infrastructure including: electrical, power, telecommunications, water supply, public safety, and transportation. ATTACHMENT: ■ Resolution No. 3117 Page 1 of 1 Approvals City Manager: Ci>> Finance Directoit STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. 3117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO CONFIRMING THE CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES' PROCLAMATION OF EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY WHEREAS, section 2.36.060(A)(1) of the San Jacinto Municipal Code empowers the Director of Emergency Services/City Manager to proclaim a local emergency if the City Council is not in session and requires that the City Council shall take action to ratify the proclamation within seven days thereafter; and WHEREAS, conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City of San Jacinto, as a result of due to severely high and damaging winds commencing on or about 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on the 21st day of October, 2007, at which time the City Council of the City of San Jacinto was not in session; and WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find that the above described conditions of extreme peril did warrant and necessitate the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency in the vicinity of San Jacinto; and WHEREAS, the City Manager acting as the Director of Emergency Services did proclaim the existence of a local emergency within the City on the 22nd day of October, 2007. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto that the Proclamation of Existence of a Local Emergency, as issued by the Director of Emergency Services/City Manager, is hereby ratified and confirmed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the local emergency shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, and that until such time, the City Council shall review, at each of its regularly scheduled meetings until the local emergency is terminated, the need for continuing the local emergency. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City staff is hereby authorized and directed to take any action that may be necessary or convenient to assist in obtaining federal, state or regional disaster/ emergency relief funding. Page 1 of 2 APPROVED, PASSED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a special meeting of said Council held on the 26th day of October 2007, by the following vote: Ayes Ayres, Mansperger, Stubblefield Nays None Absent Carlson, Ritchie Abstain None ATTEST: D. rothy Cho; inard, City Clerk Page 2 of 2 City of San Jacinto Ayres, APPROVED AS TO FORM: BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP Jeff'B"allinger, City Attorney Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: En( (1) (le rnvlacc AGENDA - T TO: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk NS TTAL FO Enclosure: Staff Report for meeting of [CC or RDA] r. XConsent Calendar Item (name — brief description) Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) City Departments Item XAttachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. A.c4 B. C. Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: date) Please record and return conformed copy I rez 6iLt q Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting DATE: (‘)Is 4_ukc [1,4 e or Initials], [Title] CAUsers\Trilake\DesIctap\Lilly\Blank Forms\Blank AGENDA Transmittal Form.doc AGENDA ITEM March 6, 2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer k� SUBJECT: Final Parcel Map 33137 — Esplanade SP Financing Map RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve final parcel map 33137 for recordation, authorize the Mayor to sign the final map, and authorize the City Clerk to release the map for recordation. DISCUSSION: The owner of the property that encompasses the Esplanade Specific Plan has completed all necessary steps and met all conditions to approval to allow for recordation of their financing map, and thus it is staff's recommendation that it be approved at this time. Tract 31886 includes 7 parcels and is located along Esplanade Ave between Warren Road and Cawston Ave. Appropriate notes have been added to the map to protect the future alignment of Highway 79. ALTERNATIVES: Approve or deny final map as presented herein. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City associated with this item. All costs are borne by developer. ATTACHMENTS: ■ Tract 33137 Final Map (for reference) Page 1 of 1 OWNERS STATEMENT WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE WAD INCWE0 WREN THE S BDORSEN SHOWN TOTEM THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NEGSS4IY TO PASS A CLEAR TIRE 10 .SRO OWN TINT WE CONSENT TO or NAMG ANO RELWEINO CF TIN SIAN0VISON MW AS NSW MINA' THE MIACN2 BORDER LIE. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO PUBLIC USE EAR siS[I AND PUBLIC ARUM PROSES+ LOTS n' REROUTE ro, INCLUSIVE WE HEREBY MICAS ABUTTERS ROBS OF ACCESS ALONG LOIS A ; P' AND IC' (PSRAYOK AVENUE) TD THE PUBLIC THE OWNERS M PARCELS I. 2 AR 7 ABUTTING TENS NCIIWNY AND DURING SUCH TALE BILL HAN NO ENDS or A/'F/S EXCEPT THE GENERAL LAYM£M or ROWEL ANY CHASE OF ALIoNmENT CR ILIDM THAT RESULTS IN THE WNW THEREOF .TALL TERMBAT TINS CONDITION of ACCESS RIMS AS TO NE PART NAC4TEA NE ALSO MO BY LETW'4TE TO TTE CITY OF .SIN N4EMO AN FAS0HENT TOR PUBLIC ROILS PUBIS URINES, INCRE55 AND EN,ta, PURPOSES As NANO HEREON. WE ALSO HEREBY DENCATE TO THE CITY OF SW MEMO AN EASEMENT FOR OR4IACE PURPOSES AS SHORN HEREON. WAREN B ESPLANADE LES A CNI ORA0A 11401111 IYBIRY COMHINY Br BY, NAME NAME A E TITLE ESP.4YACE A MWSTdA EEC, A MLIEARM4 LAMIW I NHw7Y CONANT BR Br COME 6EN@Gf9RK. *771141l AONCBAA AND WRY MOUE AONOSAU SUCCESSORS CO -TRUSTEES M THE HIAROLD AND MAT' NNW •ONOSUA 190T TRUST,' WAN w. AA:WSW, TRUSTEE 0P THE HAROLD AND AMV MAME .LNGSW CHLORINS TRUST AND MEOW B. NAGATIµ IFY0HES of ME TWKWD AND AW% NONE 6IINOOILM£N5 TRUST.DET:FICAT' WWI' A DEED OF TN/Sr 2LANNT D£CEMBR 19, 2007 AS WSTNYENT AR 01-63130 CF NMI& HLCTANs. BY BY - TAME MUST .B 0. NAME E PLWK. JOINT TENANTS NON RIGHT' OF SURINORSTAIP, BNEECNRY WIDER A DEED ITT 21. SLW AS H'STRLMBRT NO. 04-0042566, OF NFACIL RECORDS Br Br NAME SENOR MAN A SINGLE WNWL AS HER SINE AND SEPAMIE PIKWERIY, BIIETSAWY UNNR A BID OF TRUST BHYROED B1SUBLI0 2W Pow AS MSI.RB/ENT NO 00-5I2296 CF NEWS RECORDS Br m CIWOES L IOv1229B 9r UNDER A DEED OF )RUST BEORBD DE ITT IW SEND AS INS'TRUUFIRT AG Br NAME TIRE PORKY( 0. HILL 9FN6RCORY UNDER A DEED or TRUST REGORGED 0/CU TIER 2L 260E AS USTAAENT NO. (70-512296 OF STICK RECORDS NOTARY AZE112)=MFMM STATE or CANdM64 COUNTY OF Br NAME TIRE ON R95 DAY OF 10_ BEFORE ME PER/WM1Y APPEARED AND PERSONALS, KROIHN TO ME (OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASS OF SITTSFACIORY ENTENCE) T7 B THE Pt HS.m 49405E Elsa ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE NTIHN INSR UNIEW AND ACNMEW/EDGED 10 LIE THAT THEY STEERED THE SLUE N TUNER AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES ANO THAT BT TER S0ARXCS ON THE RSTHUMENT THE PERSONS, OR THE ENTITY UPON 6ENLF OF WIIKM TE PERSOS ACTED, EXECUTED ME INSTRUMENT Mr CYWYL4ON EXMRES M ,DOSS MY NNE NY PRBCIPAL PLACE or BUSINESS IS R COUNTY. NOTARY RAN.0 IN AND FOR SAO STATE ROTARY A1KN(IW; FTN17/0.7. STATE N CNNM54 )S NNW or M TUNS _ DAY OF XH_ BEFORE ME PRSONILLr ,APPEARED AND PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROAEO TO ME M THE RATS M SATISSICNRY ENNISFJ TO 90 IRE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE MLR INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TD ME RNr THEY EXECUTED THE STYE IN TER NRIOAZED CANCERS' AND TENT BY EWER SWN4Ti0ES OR THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSN$ OR THE ENTITY WON BEHALF OF MACH THE PERSONS ALTER ITECUTD 08 RS/RIRNM. MY COLIANSON LOVES Mllress Mr HARP YY PRNI4'PA. N.A:E OF MISINES 5 IN cowry NOTARY PUBLIC N ND FOR SOS STATE IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL MAP NO.33137 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3, 4. 5, 6 AND 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12765 AS SHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 69 OF PARCEL MAPS. AT PAGES 63 AND 64, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 1/2 OF FARM LOT 151, OF THE LANDS OF SAN JACINTO LAND ASSOCIATION, AS SHOWN ON MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 PAGE 357 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AEI-CASC ENGINEERING FEBRUARY 2006 SURVEYOR'S' STATU(F(JL I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A LICENSED LAND SIRYEIYR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND ROT I/XS LIP CONSSTNG OF THE SIX (0) sDctn CONAccLAY REPRESENTS A SUNNY MADE U /007 MT. SOPERAS,0N DONNA' MARCH 2004T THAT ALL NOMMTENIS 9RAM IKRE0.N ACTUALLY EMT ARO TIHR PLOSIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN OR WILL B IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE TENS M Or YIXIUYEIII AGREEMENT FOR THE RAP' ME MOMnENI^ MU. OR�A U� SWiIOYENT TO ENABLE RE SURVEY TO BE ROWED. TFE S7R,ET S TILE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN. 55�o H MINI H. ADDIIGTON. P.LS .'d]T NINES 06-30-0/ NOTARY ACKNOWLEO5MENE STATE CF CALIFORNIA )SIT COUNTY WE M TES DAM, 04�y It41:1 Lm MI 5 EYP. 06/]G/EB /H(' 1\lFOF cikk ' PERSONALLY APPEARED A40 PERSONALLY MOWN TO WE ((OR PRDYED TO ME ON 7E BASIS OF SATSFACIORT EVIDENCE) To BE THE PERSONS AROSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED 10 THE WITHIN PSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGE 10 ME THAT THEY EXECUTED RR SAME IN THEIR 4T7ERRED CANCRIES AND THAT BY VIER SGN4TTRE5 ON THE N4STRIY.40NT ME PERSONS. OR THE ENTITY UPON BENNF OF TENCH M£ PEER. ACTEA EXECUTED IE 4SIBUMFNT. DIE OF 20_ BEFORE LIE MV CO JISSI N EXPIRES Noma Mr LAND.. BY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS RS IN COUNTY. NOTARY PUBLIC PAN EAR 5W STATE B.C2TABY_601ROBILEORMERR STATE OF CMIFOTB4 )SS NUNN OF ON THIS e DAY OF 10- BEFORE LIE PERO.,OEly APPEARED AND PERSONALLY KNOW ro AT (OR PROVED To ME OR THE BASIS OF S4TTSFACRA% M9ENCF) TO TIC THE PERSONS WHOSE AWES ARE S/IBSCRXED TO THE NTRN 9NSIRUMEA'T AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED RR SAME AN NOR AM7NRIZED CLMC7R5 AND TENT Br MDR SY%. 4NRLS ON THE NSIMAKNT THE PERSONS, OR THE ENVY UPON BENNE CF MACH THE PESOS ACTED, EXECUTED THE INS'IPIYENE MY 00111E /ON EXPIRES 661NE55 MY HANN MY FRRCPA. PUCE OF BNSM'ESS NS R cNINTY. NOTARY RUBE IN AND FOR S40 STATE SIONAT1MF (7I tS51(NS NOTE PURSUANT 10 SECAM' 664.6 OF THE SUBD'ISON IMP ACE THE SIGNATURE of THE FNEOMNC EWERS OF £.lSEMIEY/s AND/OR OTHER MI/ISIs ENE BEEN swam AN EASEMENT IN FALLEN OF A 0. POMMY FOR RENA N/CHES AND PIPES REC. OS AVOWS% M BOOK 13; PAN 266. NACNL RELOROS AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF S)WHERN CAL*L7601 EDISON FOR PUBLIC NITRES REC. 11/I1/I979 AS AST. NO. /8059J ormaa REBURBS AN OFFER OF BDA'ATON FOR PLABaL ETBQT AND PAWLS UIRNTS PER P.M. 1270 PA.B 49/63-64. RIN7--OF-WAY OPERA SUMP OF LEND SI FEET WIDE NI EACH SIDE of THE MOON AND BU4HER SECTION TOILS RN RIND OR FOR DITCHES M PIPES FOR LIYIOLGTON AND N51AAf7SG WARN AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF CANYLWMIM EEOIRIC TONER COMPANY FOR IIINIIIES RES I2/14/I95I IN BOLT I.127. PACE Al, Nana RECORDS. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CL*MR4 MESON mown FOR IRICRI6 AMC 04/10/1964 AS MST. NO. IIAN. NTSPL RECORDS AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF METROPOLITAN WATER O5W/CT M SYXRBRN CALFORIBI FOR PIPELINES .400 CANALS R0/.51/c/D AUGUST S. 10561 IN BORN 2]/4 PAGE 44/1 OFFICIAL BC0.405 THE NACE LOCATION AND EXTENT 51540 FASZM`NTS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD. AN EASEMENT IN rAlOR N CALM0RNA WATER AND TELEPHONE COMPANY. A CORPORATION FOR UILAY PURPOSES RECORDED .WANE IN IRAS AS IMTRUMEVE NO. 7/505 NFIC]L RECORDS. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO CONSTRUCT. RECONSTRLCT, MINIM AND REPAIR PIPELINE RM THE COMNEYNICE OF WATER BY DEED CYaN'EITD BY CNrow.% ORCHARD OEIELOWBNT CORPORATION ID GROWS SALTER COMPANY OF SIN JACN7O RAEwmaO MARCH 291. 1017 IN BOOK 469 RAGE 96 DF DEEDS. RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COu'7Y. 04.90 ATA WHICH DEED ALSO CONVEYS AL RUMMY or CALIFORNIA ORCHARD DEIUOPWNT CORPORATION P AND TO THE POPS NOW UN AND ID BE END TAR IRE DESTRUCTION OF INTER BY SAm c111SNN SUER COMPANY CF SIN MEND. THE NPNTT To °MINA. TAPE. EPPJNT Ao AP1RNRNIE T7 as ow USE IN ANT BANNER AND BY AN AC0/IC/I ALL WATER THAT Wr 50 NS94ERE0 IN M THAT MAY BE DEPOSITED /N OR UNDERLIE THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED. AND ALL RANAN AND OTHER CORER ALMS THAT NAY BE N1flDPYENT OF SAID NITER SALE BE CDG4I0 M THE LENDS NNW DESCRIBES; AND PROVIDER HOWEVER, FURTHER, THAT THE DINERS SHALL HAVE ME ROT TO DEVELOP RIMER FOR DOMESTIC USE LW SAND INN. CONVEYED BY DEED FORM THE 5AN 440900 LAND OWPANT TO NUNS COMER NANNY or SW J4CNP17 REA:LI LAC BC0AnuN A 1911 IN LOOK JAI. PACE INS OP DEEDS RECORDS OF RN TESI0E CMMY. CALIFORNIA. TM' RIGHTS TO ALL UNDEROROLIND CAS, OIL AND MINERAL LN NNW M ALES N WSOH, ET AL IN DEED REO04000 MARCH R I921 IN BOOK ENE, PARE 207 OF DEEDS THE RANTS TO AU. OLL, SAS MM1VEFNS AND OTTER /R0.40CWMN SUBSTANCES REMAND ID THE FEDERAL LAN LW/K OF B RKELEY. BY OM RE4uaxu SE ITNELR 0 1941 A4 000 516, PAGE 194 CVFSAL RECORDS BFIY)RWFT1'S STATEMENT' FRED THIS MY OF 20_ AT /N BODY OF TAWS, AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF ME CLERK OF ME BOARD. NO fa LARRY W. ONO, MART ASS6'STM-C(ERN-REGYRDER B DEPUTY SU0DMASON GEPHAOEE BC MELTS MINNNIE THE COMPANY /IFS F/IRTNFFR'S ST4L MFNT' I HEREBY STOE THAT / HAVE E NW° THE NNW NACU NIP; THAT THE SI&/Y/SGN SHOWN INTEDN 15 SUBSTA/IILY THE Sur AS R M ETRED ON RC 1EMAME PAH THAT ALL THE PROHSFYIS OF TIE SUBONSLR MAP ACT AND OF THE SAN .N5TMO CITY ORDINANCE NO. 67.6 HAVE BEEN COMPLIED HIRE AND I AEI S4TISEH0 TNT MS W^ /S TECH/CLLY CORRECT AS 511 4N. HIED NTS _ DAY OF CRY OF SW .LMINN, CYRYARAN LORAN I. LWCASTER, LS 0054 0-30-07 20_. ERR INBIB AOMNE CITY ENGINEER TAX CM I FL7OR'5 f,F7277FIC.AT1' I HERM' BEREFT REIT ACCORDING' TO TE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE AS OF THIS DATE I/axe ARE NO TI N5 AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE BMA Amp FOR !WARM STALL G0Lt//Y, MIttMCIPAI, M LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CO/LECIED AS TAPES EXCEPT TAPES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAPES NOW A TTEN AT Nor YET P4TABE WHCN ARE ESRAIED TO RE 7 MAID: PAUL MCC5IINE1L, COWRY TAL avatar BY. DEPUTY TAX R/1MO /IFRRROATE• / HEREHT CNTNY THAT A 0PND AN THE SUM OF $ HAS BEEN SPROUTED AND FILED PUN THE BARD OF 51N£IMAYtS CF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA CTVIXTLAY/B UPON THE PAYMENT OF ALL TALES STATE BOUNN; MIM0CWA OR LOCAL AND AL 5ttMNt A5E£SMEMS COLLECTED AS TAXES NMNI AT THE TAME Cf RAG OF THIS T P N41H THE CNIMY RECORDER AREA LIEN AGANST S4O PROPERTY BUT NOT VET PAYABLE AND SRN SONO MS BEEN OL6T APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DATED: 10_ CASH GIS BOND NACY ROMMT PAM BCNM0Ell c1ERK TO IRE BOARD OF SIIPETMSORS COUNTY AAA COLLECTOR Br BW 005//Y DEPUTY GOY ACCFPLANCE STATEMENT TIE car OF SW JACINTO COUNTY or RI4ERSNE SUTE OF CAUEORI A BY AND THROWN HIS DUCT AUImAH/U OfROERS HEREBY APPROVES SRO ANAL MAP AND ACCEPTS RUE /E0G4)/.4/i SOWN /ERELW FOR PUBIC ROADS AND VNPMN MAN PURPOSES, D/6DAGE PU16M.45 AND TK BlMIXDSNNEM OF AARIERS ROMs. ME ACCEPTANCE OP THE OFFER OF c0T1C4TN! or an. STREETS 6 CON/D DEAR UPON THE MM LEILON OF KL STREET IMPRG'ARMS W7OR: DATED an _ DAY OF . 24_. MY OF 5517 JAE/MO AMITE PLY CLEAN CT' or 50e .NORM] SOFT REPORT A PREIJMN4RT SOIL RETORT WAS PREPARED BY LEIGHTON AND ASS/CPI= INC. ON OCTOBE4 7, 2004. AS REOUIREB Br THE HEALTH AND SAFETY WOE OF G4UFBRNA SECTION 17953 NOTICE OF ORAINA0F 0E3; NOTICE IS HARPY 6M1fl1 THAT M6 PF9PIXIY 5 LBMTD A THE S/N .NC/NIIT /0/004IL AREA DRAINAGE PLAN WAN WAS ADOPTED BY THE EYRD OF SLIPERI/MRS OF ME COUNTY OF /4ER/OE WARSUW7 TD SECTION 10.0 OF ORDINANCE 460 AND SECTION 6643. ET. SEQ. OF THE LOVERNMOIT COOS AND THAT END PRETERIT. IS SUBJECT RI FEES FOR SOD MANUS AREA mart 5 FURTHER GIVEN TNT. PORSMNT 10 SECTION ICES OF ORDINANCE 460, PAYMENT OF TEE MANAGE FRET SHALL BE PAD TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY F1000 CONTROL AND WREN CCWSERNAIEN DISTANT AT THE TALE N 43DNCE or A sumo M BIJNWAG RERAN RJR SAW PARCELS. W/RCMIRR OCCURS 1Nar, AND THAT THE OWNER OF EACH RAREST.. AT Or TIME OF MAACE M EITLR A MEND OR BINLO'NG PERMIT, SNAIL PAY ENE FEE REMIXED AT ENE RATE IN EFFECT AT THE RDA OF ISSUANCE WE THE ACTUAL PERMT. p0RUC WORKS ITTRFCTTIR'S APPROVAL! THE SHELL DEDICATIONS AND L1BIIY EASEMENTS SHORN ON THE ANNEXED ALP ARE HEREBY APPROVED RES _ DAT OF 24_ PUBLIC WORMS DIAECRAA CITY OF SAN J4CN70 PLANNING COMMISSION STATFMFNTT TARS NIP. PARCEL M4' NO. 33137. 5 ALL OF THE ORIGINAL. TETATVE MAP OF PARCEL MAP NA 33/3T .SRO TENANT MAP COWS AR OND BY THE CIY N SW AWN RANNND COMMISSION IN A000R04SE NON THE TAW IN A OILY AURORT70 M/0114/ N:ED APRIL 1.1. 2005 CRY or 5471 JACINTD, C4LIFORNA SECRETARY. CT' OF SAN JACMRO WARSAW CCMMSSNI CARTE TNT Mr N" 20_ IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL MAP NO. 33137 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12765 AS SHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 69 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 63 AND 64, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 1/2 OF FARM LOT 161, OF THE LANDS OF SAN JACINTO LAND ASSOCIATION, AS SHOWN ON MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 PAGE 357 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AEI—CASC ENGINEERING FEBRUARY 2006 NOTARY ACKNOWLEISWESE SITE OF MUMIRMI )55. COUNTY M ON MIS Ow OF 20_ NOME AN PERSONALLY APPEARED MED PERSONALLY XADRN ID ME (01P PROVED TO ME M DE 61515 OF SAISSICICRY EVIDENCE) TO 8 111E PERSONS 111105E NAMES ME SYBSMIBED TO NNE MIN WSIR1MENr AND AOfNOVIMICE➢ TO ME DAT INN O:ECMED DIE S M W IHER AUTHORIZED =PADRES AND DOT BY MEW S:GIMNffi ON DIE INSTRUMENT TIE PERSONS, OR DIE ENMY UPON BENMF M 1171R21 DE PEEN= ACTED. EXECUTED ME INSIRUMENT LTV' O MM11S0N EXRRES MDIESS MY /ail: MY F,WFI E PLACE OF BUSINESS IS W COIMY. NOrAFY PIRUC W AND FOR SAID STATE 8OTARY AOKNOWI FOOMFNT• STATE OF =MORI N MS. COUNTY OF ) M RRS MY OF 20 BEFORE LIE PERSONALLY APPEARED AM PERSONALLY WOW TO ME (M PROVED TO ME ON ME LADS OF SMSFACTOfY Lmxn0FJ ID BE DIE PAPA 1Xe WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED DJ ME WD7BN WSMUM0? AND ACINONI0050D TO ME THAT MET EXECUED DIE SAME M MEW ANTI2RIED CWACNIES AND Dar BY DNW =NATURES ON ME IMMINENT ME PERSONS OR NNE arum UPON DONE OF MACH THE PERSONS ACTED. EN£CNED ME 7N5/11.11AEN/.. MY CCWM�Ii 0Y' =AWES WDMESS MY HWO: MY M INCNA MACE OF DU NtE55 S W COIN= NAIAD POOLC W AND FOR SW STATE NOTARY ACKNOWLFOGMFNT. 5111E OF GMMMNN COUNTY OF M INS DAY M 20._ BEFORE LIE PERSONALLY APPEARED AND PFRSYNAUT NNVRN M ME MN PROVED TO ME ON ME 815I5 OF SRbEiCTMY EVIDENCE) M BE ME • E7.,rm NOME MIIM ARE SUBSCRIBED ID ME IM PIE BSTRMEM AND ACANCA ED0EO IV ME mar MEY EXECUTED LIME SAME N INOR AMIKKIIW CAPACITIES AND Dar MY MEW SIGN IU S M ME INSTRUMENT DIE PERSONS, M TEE ENTITY UPON SEINE M MMH DIE PERSONS ACTED, EXECUTED D/E 4bIRUMENT. 4Y COMWXSVN DIMS WDNEES MY NMI MY PAWN= PLACE OF INSEAMS 5 W CWARY. NOTARY PUNIC W AND FOR SAID STATE SHEET 2 OF 6 SH SIIRNFYOR'S N(RFS. THIS PARED. MAP CONTAINS 228.26 MIRES (GROSS) T95 PARCEL MAP INS 7 PARCELS AND 17 MIMED UDIS.. [ I INDICANTS RECORD DATA PER RECORD OF SURVEY 106/11-29. ( ) 11DICAIES RECORD DATA PER PARCEL RAP 12755, P.M.B. 69/63- 64. M) INDICATES MFASUR® DATA /// INDICATES RESTRICTED AGMS RIMS SHORN HEREON. O INDICATES SET 1' I.P.. IB' 0F]DM NID TAGGED. P.LS. 3621', FTLSH, UIBf35 06160105E NOTED. SET NNE ND TAO 'PLS. 3821' IN TOP OF CURD ON THE PROLONGATION OF SIDE LOT LINES N LIED OF FRONT LOT CORNERS. SET i' I.P.. IE IN IEN51H. MAIN PIASIM PLUG P.L.S. 3921' M AL REAR LOT CORNERS WHERE MPIWLOLF AL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS, SET'. SHALL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERM OF THE WIUMENTATON NALLIPLNT 10* TINS RAP, 1RRESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • INDICATES HMSO ROOMIEST AS NOTED. ❑1 FOUND 2 DRA4 DMA STAMPED A5 SHORN, MTN 0.07' AVIOPRR AS THE 80UIHWST CANER OF SECTION 31. T.M. fti W. S.D.M. PER RECORD Of SURVEY 166/11-29. �2 FOUND 2' IRON PIPE WRH 2' BRASS DISK. STAMPED AS SHOWN ACCEPTED AS THE WEST 1/4 CORNEA CF SECTION II, TAR, RAW, S.B.M. PER CORNER RECORD 00-73. OETYSD 1' IRON PIPE VAIN PLUG 1LLEO5LE', NO REFERENCE, N.t<PRU AS THE CENTERLINE NIEJFS9GTPAN OF CAW910N AVENUE AND SEVENTH 51NHCT. SET PLASTIC PLUG STAMPED P.L9. 3421' ©FOND I' IRON PIPE TM RUSTIC PLUG STAMPED tO. 754T. DEAN 0.5' ACCEPTED AS THE CENERUIC NRE99ECTDN OF CAWSTON AVENUE AND ESPLANADE AVENUE PER COUNTY TE ROOK 80/67. EIEOJNO i IRON PIPE WITH TAG 1.W.0. LS. 65990, MISS PEA N.S. 100/11-29. QEOJN9 T BRASS DISH STAMPED AS SHOWN ACCEPTED AS THE NCR1T1ts1 CORNEA OF SECTION 6, T.55. Ri W, sem. PER RECO1 OF SURVEY 106/11-29. S.NF. IILGTES SEARCHED NOTHING FOUND (PRO) INDICATES POINT OF REVERSE CURVE (PCC) INDICATES PONE OF COMPOUND CURVE BASIS CF RFARIN65: THE BEARINGS ON TENS NAP ANTE RASED ON RE CUM -RUNE OF WARREN ROAD AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF .SURVEY FTIED N MOK 10.9 OF RECORDS OF SCRI£Y5, AT PAGES II THROUGH 29. INCLUSIVE RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, FEND NORTH 001.240' WEST. FASFMFNT NOTES' & I DICATES 1NF CENTER LINE OF A e 6WE EASENERF IN FAOR OF SNRHE CALIFORNIA EDSON COMPANY FCR POSITS MITERS MD INCIDENTAL PIIRPO. RECORDED SE 750400R II. 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 79-190893. OFFICIAL & INMATES A 0 WANE FASERENT N FAVOR OF 50UDERS CALIFORNIA E ISO4 COMPANY FOR PUBLIC URN16 AID NC0ENTM PU410505, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 11. 1979 A9 INSTRUMENT N0. 79-190893, MAMMA RECORDS & NDICATES AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF C.WFORNIA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY FOR INC I/EREINAMER SPECIFIC PURPOSE' AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED DECE4MER 14. I951 AS BOOK 1327. PAGE 41. OAILNL RECORDS & IH0IGMES AN EASEMENT N FAVOR OF SOUMERS CAULDRON ED'SON COMPANY MUTES AND INC0E1TAL PURPOSES RECORDED APRIL 10, 1984 AS LNSTRUMMT NO. 44789, p7TCML RECORDS. & IRRGES AN EASEMENT N FAVOR OF CALIFORNIA WATER AND TELEPHONY COMPANY FLY! NAMES AND INCDEMA PURPOSES RECORDED JUNE 18, I0B5 AS RBTRUMEAF NO. 71003, OFFICIAL RECORDS. &INDICAi6 CRANE DEED N FRAM OF THE METROPOERAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 'GUARDED AUGUST 02 Mt AS INSTRUMENT N0. 94-303887, DRICML RETARDS. &INDICATES A RIGHT OF WAY OVER A STRIP OF LAND 30 FEET WOE ON EACH SATE OF THE SECTION AND WARIER SR'TON LINES FOR ROM OR FOR ISTCNE3 0R PANES FUR CONDUCTING AND M1R8MNG N OTER. &INOCAS AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SEVERAL TELEPHONE COMPACT Of GWE0RM4 FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND RR:DEMA PURPOSES, REMINDED DECEMDER 6 1976 AS NARNYIXF NO. 79-280528. 000014. RECORDS &NEGATES AN CASEMENT IN FOAM OF TE CITY OF SAN JACINTO MR ORNVADE PURPOSES AS DEDICATED AMMO. ®7GG4TES AN OFFER OF Rp0ARON 7OR P124EC s1l1CT MO POBLC URINES PER P.M. 12765, PAID. B9/6]-64. 14' IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. PARCEL MAP NO. 33137 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7 TOGETHER WITH LEI TIERED LOTS "C" THROUGH "P" INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12765 AS SHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 69 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 63 AND 64, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 1/2 OF FARM LOT 151. OF THE LANDS OF SAN JACINTO LAND ASSOCIATION, AS SHOWN ON MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 PAGE 357 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AEI-CASC ENGINEERING FEBRUARY 2006 BOUNDARY MAP EAM1Tffi 96 4' 0.8' ' PARCEL 7 57.16 ACRES (GROSS) 56.19 ACRES (NET) SEE SHEET 6 S. R.1W, S.D.M. TRACT NO. 30261 MR. 322/97-LOB 4'OTW ]89t.57' (N89T3'S2'W 2551.57) (1.16e54'06'14 2051.51') i ETY PARCEL MAP 18393 P.M.B. 106/02-64 R QAI.B PARCEL 3 23.92 ACRES (GROSS) 21.79 ACRES (NET) \ o 0 .1io PARCEL 6 24.53 ACRES (GROSS) 22.60 ACRES (NET) 2653.3 2853.24') S..Q ESPLANADE AVENUE N60'44'57'W 52915J(1.1) [NWW'47'15' 4 PARCEL 7 SHALL BE SUBJECT TO FUNRE HIGHWAY 79 ALIGNMENT WHICH IS UNDETERMINED AT THIS TIME UNE DAM TABLE CY EEAR0I5 N86'24'a'W 7NHS22HEW NBB'54bYW 84.71'041 IE4.71 I767I' 5 N0aabe'E NO20574'E NO0OSS4'E JEEP 30.01' SAD;' 00.704 wx 30.01' N 04 70 E ZOO' 10 TO N8024'a1i TN9Y2YTY6 N86124'a'W TN6872',71W 144.071 144.077 46547 00' PARCEL MAP 12954 Hi 2 P.M.B. 71/20-21 SHEET 3 OF 6 SHEETS GRAPHIC SCALE 0 800 Nee'43'40'W 284239' /1005: PARCEL I RNOLIM 7 NCLIADOE AS SHORN IYRE0N ARP SU6.£LT TO ME FULOM1M: I. SNAIL ESTABLISH OR BE INCORPORATED INTO A LAMMCAPE W'HRF AND PARK DRAT 2 SHML AMEX pan ONE 0M nWITY FMIHRES 051MCT TO PNC89E EWE AND P0CE MAUOOTEIT SEANCES APPROPRIATE 10 THE BRE a SHALL AMER ND THE PA/IIYM 9614071KMF ASSE4MMN GSNa.E 10 DAME STREET INIMMUM7 RN R AM PROJECT. 401 1321.19' 13]0.0T Y r IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. SHEET 4 OF 6 SHEETS PARCEL MAP NO. 33137 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7 TOGETHER WITH LETTERED LOTS 'C' THROUGH 'P' INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12765 AS SHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 69 OF PARCEL MAPS. AT PAGES 63 AND 64, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 1/2 OF FARM LOT 161, OF THE LANDS OF SAN JACINTO LAND ASSOCIATION, AS SHOWN ON MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 PAGE 357 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. GRAPHIC m/'Ai F 200 0 100 1W 400 &YI SEE SHEET 5 WJ 6=0E4 0 Ne]18 VI45E_[WLLJ �7/ N2990'41'L[PNC]./O PARCEL 6 II 4H Hi - II I 1 II IN86'44'57.18 1516.29'. INT'R' PARCEL 4 AEI-CASC ENGINEERING FEBRUARY 2006 PARCEL MAP 12954 � E SEVET4TN STREET N66'4S4W 284 4 UT.19' N A tM1}LIB P I- 86 SEE DETAIL "G' 414 THIS SHEET PARCEL 5 2277 ACRES (CROSS) 21.55 ACRES (NET) of N,d40151:5.{.510 / ElI•a� O© .F.FAI161 4.45' LOT 52�1.Q6"V115) 0•� _ N 41 116951104'W 581.80' ♦©• J,.. •' ,,-SEE DETAIL [ I ON THIS SHEET / E ESPLANADE PARCEL I 30.04 ACRES (CROSS) 2804 ACRES (NET) SEE DETAIL 'A' ---- FON Tf9S SHIM'001jL N69'46'STW65].9r,///// 141/li/# 4�i/W 43H1.09 4'—I L PARCEL 2 N66'44'Sn. CURVE AND 1244E DALA TABLE DELLA/BFAINIG I RADIUS LENGR✓D'ST. 1 N009126'E 3001' 1 6803634/9 10600' J 6190'46' JM.00' J1.95" A 6190'46' 10800' 106.46' 9 2742729' 10R00' 47.52' 5 N5T19'05'W 55515' 7 1928'2' 567.00' 15258' 6 1828'11 60000' 209.69' B 1100' IS 16'1T°I' 3000' BIM' 11 141429'35'E 6611 12 182812' 60000' 20189' ]] 192612' 63100' 21510' 74 147E912' 56700' 19258' 15 33'J521' 40D00' SAW' 15 545'33'45'E 48..97' I? 614121'151W 4881' IS NCO219'3YE 19 N442340'8 3465' 20 N46'47'55'E J6.52' T 309659 10100' 94.02' 3306'04' f0049T 57.77' 11211. —'I, 5544'5718 52915FM (N88'471SW) ESPLANADE AVENUE DETAIL "A" N. T. PARCEL I Nfl9'44'57• DETAIL '6" N.TS PARCEL MAP 12654 VEN9H STREET P.Y36' --.1`— .B. 71/20-21 1 NMY3'W 2642 • • S21.19' VC 4m.94e , 132007• - � 1321317 N56'44'5TW 5293.53'(1.0 [N66'4T15'W) ), , -- PARCEL MAP 12954 _ _ — — 7I/20-2I 10.6V PARCEL 4 4806 -a uP LOT'G' a Ph, n^O DETAN N.T.S e.� HUM IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. SHEET 5 OF 6 SHEETS PARCEL MAP NO. 33137 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7 TOGETHER WITH LLI[LHED LOTS 'C' THROUGH 'P" INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAP NO. 72765 AS SHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 69 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 63 AND 64, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CAL/FORMA TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 1/2 OF FARM LOT 161, OF THE LANDS OF SAN JACINTO LAND ASSOCIATION, AS SHOWN ON MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 PAGE 357 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AEI-CASC ENGINEERING FEBRUARY 2006 TT7 ___._. • 132 ESPLANADE N86'HSTW 539353(N NBBYY1519] -.j-- AVENUE OFTAII '0' MTS PARCEL 3 % �~Nry7 4. /Y 7- PARCEL 4 r 7229'r26LL :581h PARCEL 6 6T463 DETAIL N.TS PARCEL 3 N68540N01Y8.tot LL 1-W r LOT'(' 1 -1`-4BO37 NB854'OI• PARCEL 2 DETAIL -H' 1' SEE SHEET 6 - N8B5491 6665 27 LOT 'M .15 6 NBY44'Srw S B \�-�F�1`-131291J`-e I310.N' ` I e - .. NW 01 X15.9T I 1014.11 ^7'- PARCEL MAP 30251 NeC44'S7•W 5293531W N99?4)1r81 EAVENUE� 12 9, a 729,54 -.j�- �.P.MB. 922/97-109 PARCEL MAP 12954 ``-- -- P.M.B. 71/20-21 pp 1 A E I 20 _ _ I N88�'4 O.e. N66YT23Y �1 I 594.20' 11 I NI 445-11 11 II DETAIL "0" L 2' I _7-ON PIS SHEET 1 5 DETAIL 'F' ICES. PARCEL MAP 18393 P.M.N. 706/62-64 33054'0rw 2551.57' (8891322'S 2951.571 (98954•0B•W 285 2287.44' 1"7 Y- .7-7'7 ,-> 7- i GRAPHIC SCALE 100 200 400 GU1M1E AW DA UBLE CW5E N9 UNE DATA 1081E 00L19/1041950 US L5 DRI/DI5'r. Q DELTA/BEARING PAOIUS LENGM/d51. 1 685.595418 104000' 32 777640' 800.07 18268' 2 6049400£ 4401' 33 6171•01' 600.00" 1236' 3 7r360, 600.00' 18828' 34 177550' 61105 19441' 4 91541.491' 2001' 38 I730$0' 903m' 164.26' 5 1837'41' 505CC' 195.07 36 004216' 000.00' 7.38' 6 9019.737E 4091' 3) 165334- 800.00' 17590' 7 6009196t 1255' 38 0008117 587.50 767' 8 198851852-8 9494' 39 773550' 567.M' 17414' 9 773570' 657.90' 17414• 40 104731- 55E00' 166.17 ID 90094191'S 20.00' 41 N6D4'097 3202' 11 60094987 ,335004' 42 084529 15040 ' 229.49' 12 1928'1 0o50' 20107 43 002352' 047.00' SB' O 13 192812_ 834.50' 21510' 44 855197 3000' 34.48' 14 v929'12° 800.07 20302' 45 222291' 18¢00 39.05' IS 192812- 56700' 19261' 48 N4421.1511/ 49.91' 16 81805876t 3300' 47 184575159 4097 17 1821172' 557.0' 19269' 18 6190.46" 3600' 31.95 IB 0000,26t 30.61' 49 614746- 100.28' 70549' 19 1735'50° 63E00' 194,41' So 277724' 100,00' 47.92' 20 x0127341 44.d' S1 337522' 004028' 89.87' 21 0720.24- 63303' 14.60' S2 305859' 70000' 34.02' 22 565524' 3600' 2960' S3 3395'04' 700.00' 57.77 23 7522'52' 10600' 131.55 S4 7492995E 66.11' 34 070710- 600.00' 74.55' 25 187071032'8 33.00' 23. 6833619-E 4976' 36 1817'91' Marto' 25.73' 25 818'42157(83 10500' 37 948'*7'55°E 36.SS' 27 5320'04' 30.00' 2793' S8 N442r45W 3686' 28 04Y647- 1544.07 120E0' S9 1.1457614'0 3419' 9795115'W 30.19' 60 N15,44'.30i 30.24' NW44'05-E 3459' 61 5725'26' moo' 4007 31 1347812' 10400' 23429' EST 0454'40' 1456.00' 11833' SEVEN SiRi PARCEL 8 24.53 ACRES (GROSS) 22,00 ACRES (NET) ---R N9843.40.9364235-.7�\ _ 6 [1-20, I I PAWCELII 4 25.48 ACRES (GROSS) 23.12 ACRES (NET) 'D11W 460.74o ' 1 L 1 25'S(PRE) N341'€ 90(PR4.1. m 44' 6'33t N581229 1)S22' PARCEL 2 44.36 ACRES (CROSS) 38.93 ACRES (NET) 2539. or 3' SEE SHEET 4 N66'44'67'W 1 9sxdr: h-i �I .0 R IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. SHEET 6 OF 6 SHEETS PARCEL MAP NO. 33137 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7 TOGETHER WITH LEI IENED LOTS 'C' THROUGH 'P' INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12765 AS SHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 69 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 63 AND 64, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TOGETHER WITH THE' WEST 1/2 OF FARM LOT 161, OF THE LANDS OF SAN JACINTO LAND ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN ON MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 PAGE 357 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. CURVE ARO LI= DATA TABL3' I) OaTA/•LNIMG 960'W 1 0120'24' 2 S 5'0/' 3 742212' 4 ONT10' B N8355',9 E 533.00' Jam' 100m' 600.00' lEkciH/DIST.. 1450' 2£80' 131.58' 74.55' 8 NIW421316110 7 5320'O4' 8 O02S59' 9 8351'23* 15 T272'21' 11 0415Lr 12 1345112E 13 N0094b4'E 14 N01RT3419 15 118854'0rW 16 85924'54b' 17 1N5d22'17 1 1a 859Y2'23'V 35 m' 561.00E 3000' Im00' 1544.00E 10000' 100.00E 27.93' 395E 3448E 39.05' 12660' 23499E 3458' 178.7,E z5 t11�64 4 1552'4S 20 N2r4r51T 21 b5M5'S5 ST s125'%' 23 04'34'40• 24 N4536'14'W 25 N45'41'302 10000' I000m' 3650' 1455.00' sale' 22049E 3007' 15.33E 3419E 3024' 26 Nm13'40'W 30'— AEI-CASC ENGINEERING FEBRUARY 2006 255139E - SBSi2. 'SrW 5293.53 ) [N80'4Ti5'W] OFTAW '1' N.1..S PARCEL MAP 18393 P.M.S 108/62-54 1-y SEYENiH SURE, N5834brw 2851.5T / - (N50'13'S2'W %5t57) [N8B5498'W 2881.515 57W 15'9. 312.61 88I45r* 57at53TN)[ [N588r15'W] TRACT Na 30251 M.B. 322/97-1m • PARCEL 7 SHALL BE SUBJECT TO IUIURE HIGHWAY 79 ALIGNMENT WHICH IS UNDETERMINED AT THIS TIME. Ili • L0 PARCEL 3 '01'W 450.3 9 PARCEL 6 lI A 4. 6 PARCEL 2 • Mx GRAPHIC G'MF 200 0 lm 200 400 500 • 1 4/ 200 AGE IA-T TO: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for CC [CC or RDA] TT Meeting of 3-06-08 Park Hill Specific Plan Reimbursement Agreement (name — brief description) Consent Calendar Item Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published N/A (date(s) Notices sent N/A (date(s) City Departments Item Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: Reimbursement Agreement IP. Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Asher Hartel Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary onnments: r)COVY1(ie Name of person tha DATE: 2-26-08 nrkis one 11 es II be presenting item at the meeting: Asher Hartel Asher Hartel, Planning Director [Name or Indials], [Title] S: \Community Development1PLANNER1Asher\SP Park Hill\CC Transmittal 3-06-08 Reimbursement Agmnt.doc AGENDA ITEM 3 ' March 6, 2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Asher Hartel, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Reimbursement Agreement — Pacific Century Homes Park Hill Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve the Reimbursement Agreement with Pacific Century Homes in the amount of $164,500 for processing the Park Hill Specific Plan, a 158-acre specific plan proposed in the southeastern area of the City. BACKGROUND: The Park Hill Specific Plan is proposed for the 158 acres in the undeveloped hilly area surrounded by Park Avenue. Due to the scope of the project, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will need to be prepared and the services of a project planner will be required. In order to facilitate the processing of the application and hire the requisite consultants, funds will have to be provided by the applicant. The reimbursement agreement provides for the applicant to fully pay for the services needed to process the application The total cost estimated to process the application is $164,500. The environmental consultant's estimate to prepare the EIR is $110,000. The estimate for the project planner to process the application and manage the project on behalf of the City is $39,500. Legal costs are estimated at $15,000. DISCUSSION: The use of environmental and planning consultants is standard practice in San Jacinto. A number of specific plans and environmental documents have been processed and prepared. To date, all have used the services of such firms. Approvals City Manager: Finance Director/ Pagel of2 The firms selected to provide environmental and project management services to the City for this project include Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) and David Leonard Associates. MBA is a firm with a significant track record in preparing CEQA and related documents. They are on the City's list of approved firms for such services. David Leonard Associates has been providing project management services to the City for over three years and is currently processing the DR Horton Tenaya Specific Plan and the San Jacinto Ranch Specific Plan in the Gateway Area. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the staff recommendation; or 2. Direct staff to prepare the CEQA document and assume project management services, which could result in a delay the processing of the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The project proponent will bear the full cost for the processing of the project entitlement applications. ATTACHMENTS: • Reimbursement Agreement Page 2 of 2 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, a California Municipal corporation and Pacific Century Group REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT This Reimbursement Agreement ("Agreement") is made this 6th day of March, 2008, by and between the City of San Jacinto, a California municipal corporation ("City"), and Pacific Century Group (the "Applicant"). RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts: l . The Applicant is the owner of that certain real property (the "Property") located within the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, California, known as the Park Hill Specific Plan. 2. The Applicant is contemplating the development of the Property as a mixed density residential Specific Plan (the "Project"). The Applicant has submitted an application for discretionary land use approval for the Project including, without limitation, approval of a Specific Plan and environmental documents pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 3. To provide City with the environmental documentation advice necessary to City's review process concerning the Project (collectively, the "Investigations"), it is necessary for City to retain the services of various technical consultants, including an environmental consultant, a Planning Project Manager, and Legal Counsel (collectively, the "Consultants"). 4. As a condition to City's completion of the review process, the Applicant has agreed to reimburse City for the Consultants costs and other expenses related to City's review process in the manner and amounts set forth in this Agreement. The Applicant's reimbursement of City under this Agreement will ensure that City has the necessary resources to diligently and efficiently process the Applicant's Project. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual promises and agreements, City and the Applicant agree as follows: 1. Incorporation of recitals. The parties agree that the recitals constitute the factual basis upon which City and the Applicant have entered into this Agreement. City and the Applicant each acknowledge the accuracy of the Recitals and agree that the Recitals are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth at length. 2. City to retain Consultants. As a necessary and indispensable part of its fact finding process relating to the review the Project, City shall retain, by means of contracts (the "Consultant Contracts"), the services of the Consultants set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement, to provide such environmental analysis and documentation, project planning and legal counsel as City may deem 1 N1W620AOO1ADoc'Reimbursement Ag-03 necessary in its reasonable and sole discretion. (A) Scope of Work. The scope of work of each respective Consultant is attached hereto as Exhibits "B" through "D" (collectively and individually, the "Scope of Work"). City reserves the right to amend the Scope of Work where such amendments are reasonably necessary and related to City's proper review and consideration of the Project; provided, however, except as provided in Section 5(A) of this Agreement, any such amendment to the Scope of Work which increases the Estimated Costs (defined below) shall be subject to the Applicant's written approval. (B) Reimbursable Costs. Prior to City entering into the Consultant Contracts, City will require each Consultant to submit bid proposals with a "not -to -exceed" maximum bid (the "Proposal(s)") for their respective Scope of Work. The sum of the amounts contained in the Proposals shall be submitted to the Applicant for the Applicant's written approval prior to City entering into any of the Consultant Contracts. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, only the estimated Consultants' costs approved in writing by the Applicant (the "Estimated Costs") and the costs of a Change Order (defined below) approved in writing by the Applicant (collectively, the "Approved Costs") shall be reimbursable under this Agreement. The Applicant agrees that, notwithstanding the Applicant's reimbursement obligations under this Agreement, the Consultants selected by City shall be the contractors exclusively of City and not of the Applicant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to applicable law, including Public Resources Code Sections 21082.1 and 21167.6, City acknowledges that the Applicant has input regarding the Project that will be valuable in the course of the Investigations and, therefore, City agrees to submit draft documents of the reports of the Investigations (the "Draft Reports") to the Applicant to provide the Applicant with the opportunity to review and comment on the Investigations prior to finalization of the same. City and Consultants agree to objectively analyze all of the Applicant's comments to the Draft Reports. The Applicant agrees that it shall have no ownership interest in any reports, correspondence, plans, maps, drawings, news releases or any and all other documents or work product produced by the Consultants pursuant to the Consultant Contracts. City shall include in each of the Consultant Contracts a termination provision authorizing City to immediately terminate the contracts without cause by sending written notice of termination to the Consultant. 3. Cooperation. The Applicant agrees to cooperate in good faith with the Consultants and City and to cause its agents, employees, consultants, contractors and attorneys to do the same, including providing all necessary documents or information reasonably requested of them by the Consultants. City and the Consultants agree to cooperate in good faith with the Applicant and to provide all necessary documents or information requested of them by the Applicant. 4. City's Preliminary Selection of Consultants. City has elected to retain the following firms as Consultants pursuant to this Agreement: (A) Michael Brandman Associates 2 N: »W 620V001 DocRReimbursement Ag-03 (B) David Leonard Associates City may select other consultants to replace the Consultant identified above upon receipt of written approval from the Applicant. Applicant's Payment of Consultant Costs and Expenditures/Change Orders. (A) Initial Payment. Prior to the commencement of the Investigations, the Applicant shall pay to City the amount of the Estimated Costs (S164,500.00). Further, the Applicant agrees to reimburse City for any additional reasonable Consultants' costs associated with the Investigations; provided, however, such additional costs shall not exceed ten percent (10%) (in the aggregate) of the Estimated Costs. City shall use good faith efforts to prevent costs in excess of the Estimated Costs. (B) Change Order. City may incur aggregate Consultants' costs up to the Estimated Costs plus ten percent (10%) without consulting the Applicant. In the event City and/or Consultants determine that the Scope of Work requires modification and such modification will result in costs exceeding the Estimated Costs by more than ten percent (10%), City shall submit a proposal (the "Change Order") to the Applicant detailing the request to change the Scope of Work and the additional costs associated with such Change Order prior to amending the Scope of Work. The decision to submit a Change Order and the amount of the Change Order shall lie within the reasonable and sole discretion of City; provided however, the Applicant's obligation to reimburse City for the Change Order shall be contingent upon City's receipt of the Applicant's written approval of the Change Order. Early Termination of Consultant Contract. In the event any Consultant Contract is terminated prior to the completion of its respective Scope of Work, City shall apply the remaining funds allocated to such Consultant Contract toward the retention of another consultant (subject to approval by the Applicant pursuant to Section 4 of this Agreement) to complete the unfinished work. The Applicant also understands and agrees that payment of outstanding costs approved by the Applicant, if any, shall be a condition of approval by City for the Project, as well as, any subsequent project entitlements. 6. Payment of Reimbursement Amounts. Immediately following City's disbursement of funds to a Consultant pursuant to a Consultant Contract, City shall withdraw the applicable amount(s) from the amounts received by the Applicant. City shall provide written invoices to the Applicant documenting the applicable amount(s) withdrawn within fifteen (15) days of written request from the Applicant for such documentation. In the case of an approved Change Order, City shall make a written request to the Applicant for payment of the amount paid by City to the applicable Consultant(s) for the approved Change Order. At the time it makes such a request, City shall provide the Applicant with such documentation as the Applicant may reasonably require to substantiate any of the requests for (C) 3 N:W620\001\DOc\Rcimbursement Ag-03 payment. The Applicant shall pay City the amount requested within twenty (20) days after receipt of such written request from City. Within thirty (30) days of either the natural expiration of this Agreement or termination of this Agreement and the payment of all Approved Costs incurred to date, City shall refund to the Applicant any remaining funds. 7. City to Retain Absolute Discretion. The Applicant acknowledges and agrees that, notwithstanding the Applicant's obligations under this Agreement, City is not obligated to approve any or all of the proposed uses for the Project, to approve any environmental documents which may be required for any of the uses contemplated by the Project, or to approve any development agreement pertaining to the Project. The Applicant warrants and represents that no City official, officer, employee, agent or attorney has represented, expressly or impliedly, that City will approve the Project. The Applicant understands that there will be numerous decisions made by City, with regard to the Project. All such decisions of City shall be made only after full compliance with all City's statutory and other legal obligations and after considering all appropriate information and evidence, including such evidence which may cause City to disapprove any or all of the contemplated uses of the Project. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, City retains all authority and discretion granted to it by law to either approve, disapprove or modify any of the proposed uses of the Project. The Applicant acknowledges that City may approve, or approve with modifications, any or all components of the Project. The Applicant agrees that City shall not be bound by any recommendations or conclusions reached by the Consultants and that City may accept or reject, in whole or in part, any such recommendations or conclusions which City, in its reasonable and sole discretion, deems to be unreasonable or contrary to City's land use ordinances and regulations or State statutes or regulations. 8. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date that this Agreement is approved by the City Council and fully executed by the parties and shall terminate when all work required by each Consultant Contract has been completed to City's reasonable satisfaction and the Applicant has satisfied all of its obligations under this Agreement including, without limitation, the obligation to reimburse City for the Approved Costs, whether or not paid by City prior to the date of termination. The Applicant's obligation to reimburse City as provided in this Agreement shall survive the termination of this Agreement pursuant to this section. 9. Early Termination. City may terminate this Agreement prior to the end of the term set forth in Section 8 above, without cost or liability to City, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Applicant. The Applicant may terminate this Agreement prior to the end of the term set forth in Section 8 above, without cost or liability to the Applicant (except to the extent of any Approved Costs incurred to the date of termination), upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City. 10. Remedies Upon Default. An event of default shall be deemed to exist upon the occurrence of all three of the following: (A) Either City or the Applicant has, without legal justification or excuse, breached any 4 N:'v,W620A001`DocAReimbursement Ag-03 one or more of its obligations under this Agreement; and (B) The nondefaulting party has sent written notice to the party claimed to be in default, specifying the default and what actions the nondefaulting party asserts should be taken to remedy the default; and (C) The party claimed to be in default has not, within ten (10) days following receipt of the written notice described above, either corrected the default or taken actions, reasonably satisfactory to the nondefaulting party, to remedy the default within a reasonable period of time, but in no event longer than thirty (30) days after receipt of the written notice described above. Following an event of default, the nondefaulting party may exercise any and all remedies available to it pursuant to this Agreement, or at law or in equity, including, without limitation, instituting an action for damages, injunctive relief, or specific performance. 11. Nonwaiver of Rights or Remedies. The failure of a party to exercise any one or more of its rights or remedies under this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that party's right to enforce that right or seek that remedy in the future. No course of conduct or act of forbearance on any one or more occasions shall be deemed to be an implied modification of the teiins of this Agreement. 12. Assignability. This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without the prior and express written consent of the other party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. In determining whether to approve a request by the Applicant to assign this Agreement, City may consider, among other things, the proposed assignee's financial status and commitment to the Project. Any attempted assignment of this Agreement not in compliance with the tei ins of this Agreement shall be null and void and shall confer no rights or benefits upon the consignee. 13. No Oral Modifications. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of City and the Applicant and supercedes all other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement may be modified, but only by a writing signed by both City and the Applicant. All modifications to this Agreement must be approved by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto. 14. Binding Upon Successors. This Agreement and each of its terms shall be binding upon City, the Applicant and their respective officers, elected officials, employees, agents, contractors, and peimitted successors and assigns. 15. Legal Challenges. The Applicant may, in its sole and absolute discretion, retain legal counsel and appear as the real party in interest in any third party action, claim, or suit challenging any action taken by City with regard to any procedural or substantive aspect of City's approval of the Project, the environmental process, or the proposed uses of the Project. In such event, City shall retain legal counsel to defend such third party action, claim, or suit; provided, however, the Applicant's legal counsel shall have the lead role in any such legal challenge. The Applicant shall reimburse City for any and all reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Nothing herein shall be construed to require City to defend any third party action, claim, 5 N:AW 620\001 ADoc\Reimbursemenl Ag-03 or suit if the Applicant chooses not to make an appearance as a real party in interest in such legal challenge. 16. Attorneys' Fees. In the event that any action or proceeding, including arbitration, is commenced by either City or the Applicant against the other to establish the validity of this Agreement or to enforce any one or more of its terms, the prevailing party in any such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from the other, in addition to all other legal and equitable remedies available to it, its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of litigation, including, without limitation, filing fees, service fees, deposition costs, arbitration costs and expert witness fees, including reasonable costs and attorneys' fees on appeal. 17. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement is executed and is to be performed in the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California, and any action or proceeding brought relative to this Agreement shall be heard in the appropriate court in the County of Riverside, California. City and the Applicant each consent to the personal jurisdiction of the court in any such action or proceeding. 18. Time is of the Essence. Except as otherwise expressly stated, time is of the essence in the performance of every act required pursuant to this Agreement. 19. Covenant of Further Assurances. City and the Applicant shall take all other actions and execute all other documents which are reasonably necessary to effectuate this Agreement. 20. Interpretation. City and the Applicant agree that this Agreement is the product of mutual negotiations and is an arms -length transaction. Each party has negotiated this Agreement with the advice and assistance of legal counsel of its own choosing. It is further agreed that this Agreement as a product of mutual drafting efforts by both City and the Applicant and, accordingly, the rule that ambiguities in a document shall be construed against the drafter of the document, shall have no application to this Agreement. In construing and interpreting this Agreement, the finder of fact shall give effect to the mutual intention of City and the Applicant, notwithstanding such ambiguity, and may refer to the facts and circumstances under which this Agreement is made and such other extraneous evidence as may assist the finder of fact in ascertaining the intent of City and the Applicant. 21. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is found to be invalid or unenforceable, City and the Applicant both agree that they would have executed this Agreement notwithstanding the invalidity of such term or provision. The invalid term or provision may be severed from the Agreement and the remainder of the Agreement may be enforced in its entirety. 22. Headings. The headings of each section of this Agreement are for the purposes of convenience only and shall not be construed to either expand or limit the express terms and language of each section. 6 N:\W620\O01\Doc\Reimbursement Ag-03 23. Representations of Authority. Each party signing this Agreement on behalf of a party which is not a natural person hereby represents and warrants to the other party that all necessary legal prerequisites to that party's execution of this Agreement have been satisfied and that he or she has been authorized to sign this Agreement and bind the party on whose behalf he or she signs. 24. Notices. Notices required under this Agreement shall be sent to the following: If to City: If to Applicant: City of San Jacinto Planning Director 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto, CA 92583 Attn: Planning Department Facsimile No. (951) 487-6779 Pacific Century Group 40980 County Center Drive Suite 110 Temecula, CA 92591 Attn: Stephen S. King Notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed received as follows: (A) If sent by United States Mail - five (5) calendar days after deposit into the United States mail, first class postage prepaid. (B) If by facsimile, upon transmission and actual receipt by the receiving party. (C) If by express courier service or hand delivery, on the date of receipt by the receiving party. The addresses for notices set forth in this Section 24 may be changed upon written notice of such change to either City or the Applicant, as appropriate. 25. Days. Unless otherwise specified to the contrary, "days" in this Agreement shall mean calendar, not business, days. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 7 N:\W620\00I\Doc\Reimbursement Ag-03 "CITY" CITY OF SAN JACINTO A California municipal corporation By: Date: Mayor ATTEST: By: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney By: "APPLICANT" Sin Stephen King, ATTEST: By: (CORPORATE SEAL) Date: Z-ZGo -08 AGE A - T NS TO: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk 2 • Enclosure: Staff Report for CC Meeting of 3-06-08 [CC or RDA] Park Hill Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report Professional Services Agreement (name — brief description) I* Consent Calendar Item Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached ___ yes no Published N/A (date(s) Notices sent N/A (date(s) City Departments Item 10- Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: m Professional Services Agreement 10. Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Asher Hartel Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting: Asher Hartel DATE: 2-26-08 Asher Hartel, Planning Director [Name or Initials], [Title] S:\Cornmunity Deyelopment1PLANNER\Asher\SP Park IIill\CC Transmittal 3-06-08 Prof Svs Agmntcloc AGENDA ITEM 5. S March 6, 2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Asher Hartel, AICP, Planning Directo SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement — Michael Brandman Associates, Park Hill Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve the Professional Services Agreement with Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) in the amount of $110,000 for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Park Hill Specific Plan, a 158-acre specific plan proposed for the Park Hill area in the southeastern area of the City. BACKGROUND: The Park Hill Specific Plan is proposed for the 158 acres in the undeveloped hilly area surrounded by Park Avenue. Due to the scope of the project, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will need to be prepared. Four proposals were received from consultants to prepare an EIR; staff recommends the proposal from MBA. The total cost estimated to prepare the EIR is $110,000. A reimbursement agreement with the project proponent, Pacific Century Homes, has been prepared and is agendized under separate cover for Council consideration. Pursuant to the terms of the reimbursement agreement, the project proponent will bear the cost of the MBA contract. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the staff recommendation; or 2. Direct staff to solicit proposals from other firms from the City's list of approved environmental consultants; or 3. Direct staff to prepare the CEQA document, which could result in a delay the processing of the project. Approvals City Manager: Finance Directo Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: As indicated previously, the applicant will bear the full cost of this agreement pursuant to the terms of a separate reimbursement agreement. ATTACHMENTS: • Professional Services Agreement Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this 61h of March, 2008, by and between the City of San Jacinto, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 248 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California 92583 ("City") and Michael Brandman Associates ("Consultant") a sole proprietorship with its principal place of business at 621 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 100, San Bernardino, CA 92408. City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant. Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional Environmental Impact Report consulting services to public clients, and is familiar with the plans of the City. 2.2 Project. City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the San Jacinto Park Hill EIR ("Project") as set forth in this Agreement. 3. TERMS. 3.1 Scope of Services and Term. 3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional economic development consulting services to public clients consulting services necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from March 6, 2008 to December 31, 2008 unless terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines set by City staff. 3.2 Responsibilities of Corsultant. 3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this RVPUBVDKG1621684 -1- to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents and warrants that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, including a City business license, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub -consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project. 3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.2.10 Insurance. 3.2.10.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence Services under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subcontractor has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.2.10.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001); (2) Automobile Liability Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto); and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this RVPUBVDKG1621684 -3- addition, such insurance shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. 3.2.10.6 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the City, either: (") the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or (B) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.2.10.7 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the City. 3.2.10.8 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and shall be on forms provided by the City if requested. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the City before performance of Services commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.2.11 Safety. Consultant shall execute and perform its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (") adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.3 Fees and Payments. 3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized cost and expense reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the -rates setf th-in-Exhibit_ " hed-her-eto-and-in c©rporatec_ber-eirt by reference. In no.euent ssh 11 the total compensation, including authorized cost and expense reimbursements, exceed One Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($110,000) without written approval of City's Representative. Extra Work, as defined below, may be authorized as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates the portion of Services work completed and hours of work rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the portion of Services and hours of work rendered by Consultant since the initial commencement date, or since the start of subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within forty-five (45) days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. RVPUB'DKG1621684 3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any -5- 3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective Parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective Parties may provide in writing for this purpose: Consultant: Michael Brandman Associates 621 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 100 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Attn: Ken Norton City: City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Attn: Asher Hartel Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the Party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality. 3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 3.5.3.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of RVPUBADKGA621684 -7- Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.5.13 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly fo. or against any Party. Unless otherwise specified in this Agreement, any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, consultants and subcontractors of Consultant except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement. 3.5.14 Amendment; Modification. No waiver, supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.5.15 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 3.5.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.5.17 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.5.18 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.5.19 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise Program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.5.20 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer RVPUB\DKG1621684 -9- SIGNATURE PAGE TO CITY OF SAN JACINTO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT CITY OF SAN JACINTO MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES "CITY" By: Attest: Barry McClellan City Manager Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Approved as to Form: City Attorney Best Best & Krieger LLP RVPUBIDKG1621684 -11- "CONSULTANT" By: Ken NortonICP Its: Project Di ector EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF SERVICES The term of this Agreement shall be from March 6, 2008 to December 31, 2009, unless earlier terminated as provided in this Agreement. Consultant shall complete all Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet all other established schedules and/or deadlines set by City staff. RVPUB\DKG1621681 B-1 C CE<AtirF-3 MBA Proposal for the Park Hill Project EIR in the City of San Jacinto SCOPE OF WORK SCOPE OF WORK MBA proposes the following scope of ork to complete the required environmental documentation for the Park Hill Project in San Jacinto. Task L• Project Initiation MBA will attend a kickoff meeting with City and Applicant representatives to discuss the project scope and schedule. A major focus will be the development proposals for the three different parcels or planning areas, and how these will be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). We will use this meeting to collect relevant project data from the City, the applicant, and finalize the proposed project description and review anticipated tasks. We assume this initial meeting can be used to receive all project information and existing technical reports, including all documents available in support of the planned development projects. MBA will prepare and distribute a Notice of Preparation (NOP) to inform the State Clearinghouse, local agencies, and public (up to 50 parties) that the City is preparing an EIR for this project. MBA will use the Initial Study already prepared by the City and work with City staff to develop the distribution list. State agencies will be informed through the State Clearinghouse. The NOP will be released as soon as the City and Applicant believe that the NOP accurately describes the proposed project improvements, including the maximum intensity of land uses proposed and offsite improvements. The NOP will also be used to announce a project scoping meeting. Task 2: Technical Studies MBA understands that the following technical studies for this project have already been, or are being prepared by other consultants: 1. Air Quality - Urban Crossroads; 2. Biological Resources - Teracor; 3. Cultural Resources - Teracor; 4. Geology/Soils - Leighton & Associates; 5. Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Inland Foundation engineering, Inc.; 6. Hydrology/Water Quality - K & A Engineering; 7. Noise - Urban Crossroads; and 8. Transportation/Traffic (Traffic, Parking, and Access) - Urban Crossroads. MBA will peer review these studies, in consultation with City staff, to determine that they are adequate for inclusion in the EIR analysis. MBA also requests that the geotechnical study be submitted to the County Geologist in this regard. Additional Studies. It appears the only technical study not yet prepared or underway for this project is a water supply assessment per the requirements of SB 221 and SB 610. For the purposes of this proposal, MBA assumes the Applicant will provide MBA with the water supply assessment. MBA Proposal for the Park Hill Project EIR in the City of San Jacinto SCOPE OF WORK Task 3: Screencheck Draft EIR MBA will prepare a comprehensive EIR document based on current CEQA Guidelines and the City's "Local Guidelines for Implementing CEQA." The document will include an Introduction that will present the purpose and intent of the EIR, including the overall environmental review process. Effects found to be not significant will be specifically listed. The project sponsors and contact persons will be identified. It will also include an Executive Summary, which is a brief synopsis of the major sections of the EIR. They key consideration for this project EIR will be the formulation of a comprehensive description of the project. MBA will work closely with City staff to prepare an accurate description, including: (1) regional and local setting; (2) project history; (3) project characteristics, including engineering and design concepts, construction program and phasing plans if any; and (4) related discretionary approvals. The most important aspect of this task will be the description of each individual parcel or planning area to lay the groundwork for the analysis of impacts later in the EIR document. MBA will document baseline conditions, conduct impact evaluations, and formulate mitigation measures for any potentially significant impacts that may be identified. The emphasis will be on the identification of significant impacts that would result from project implementation. Impact significance will be determined by defining the changes to the environmental baseline that would result from project implementation and comparingthat changed environmental condition to a standard or threshold of significance. Impacts will be evaluated in proportion to their severity and probability of occurrence. Thresholds of significance will be based on any such standards that have been officially adopted by the City or other public agencies with primary authority relative to the impact in question, and/or those thresholds set forth in the current State CEQA Guidelines. If the proposed project incorporates specific design or implementation measures intended to mitigate potentially significant environmental effects, such measures will be noted and an assessment of the project's "net impact significance" following implementation of the applicant's proposed mitigation measures will be made. Where impacts are found to be significant, MBA will develop measures to mitigate such effects to below a level of significance, if feasible. All recommended mitigation measures will be defined to represent a close nexus between the measure and a legitimate governmental interest, and will be directly proportional to the level of impact resulting from the project. If all feasible mitigation measures cannot reduce any potential impact to less than significant levels, a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) would be needed for that impact. The following sections outline the MBA approach to the analysis of each particular environmental impact topic that may be addressed in the EIR; topics are not listed in order of importance but alphabetically as they would be discussed in the document. Aesthetics. This section will describe and evaluate the change in the overall visual character of the project site that will result from the grading and development of new residential buildings, roads, etc. Grading plans and photographs of the site from surrounding vantage points will be used to carefully evaluate potential changes in views as a result of construction. At this time, MBA does not propose to prepare photographic computerized renderings. If the City requires such renderings, they can be added to MBA's scope of work or provided under separate contract from the Applicant and peer reviewed by MBA and City staff. This could MBA Proposal for the Park Hill Project EIR in the City of San Jacinto COPE OF WORK become an important issue due to the elevation and location of the project relative to surrounding residents and residences in the City and nearby Hemet. Agricultural Resources. MBA will use the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) methodology now required by the State Department of Conservation to assess potential agricultural resources. Air Quality. Using the technical air quality study prepared for the project, MBA will evaluate the potential short- and long-term emissions from the project based on methodologies established by the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in their latest CEQA Handbook. MBA will compare estimated emissions to district thresholds to determine of construction or operation activities of the project will exceed local significance criteria. MBA will recommend mitigation measures as appropriate to reduce impacts to the greatest extent feasible. MBA will also be sensitive to the duration of construction activities and not just the absolute intensity, both of which contribute to air emissions over the long term. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Since a technical air quality study is being supplied, MBA does not propose to conduct a separate analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and global climate change impacts for this project. However, if such a study is needed, MBA can prepare it or it can be supplied by the air quailty consultant and peer reviewed by MBA. Biological Resources. MBA will use the project biological resource assessment to evaluate potential impacts to listed or otherwise sensitive plant and/or animal species. Fortunately, MBA has a variety of biologists who have performed biological surveys in this area, and so are familiar with local plant and animal species. MBA assumes this study conforms to and meets the County's Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) requirements, including an assessment of sensitive plants, riparian/riveride resources, Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) report (if needed), etc. If such a study is needed, MBA can prepare it or it can be supplied by the air quailty consultant and peer reviewed by MBA. Cultural Resources. MBA will use the technical study to support the EIR effort and will identify any potential resources in the area and recommend mitigation to reduce any identified impacts. Soils/Geology. MBA will use the project geotechnical and soils reports to evaluate earth - related conditions on the site that could affect the design of the project, including the potential for landslides, regional and local faults, liquefaction, subsidence, and soil constraints such as compaction, shrink/swell, etc. MBA will use information from the federal Natural Resources Conservation Service as necessary to complete this work. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. MBA will compile available information on any recognizable environmental conditions on the site, fire hazards and fire hazard reduction measures. MBA will also provide the level of detail similar to a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment without producing an actual Phase 1 report. The EIR will also evaluate emergency access and response plans. Hydrology and Water Quality. MBA will use hydrology and runoff data from the project engineer/applicant's report as a base to evaluate localized drainage impacts of the project. MBA Proposal for the Park Hill Project E1R in the City of San Jacinto SCOPE OF WORK Flood data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency will also be used to determine if the project will be subject to potential flooding impacts. The project will create a large developed area with impervious surfaces (i.e., asphalt. rooftops) that will incrementally increase runoff to City storm drains. MBA will identify what components should be incorporated into a Water Quality Management Plan for this project per Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requirements that should be prepared by the applcant's engineer prior to circulation of the EIR. MBA will work with City staff to determine if or to what degree this amount of runoff could negatively impact local drainage facilities such as the nearby Wildwood Creek. Land Use and Planning. MBA will evaluate the project's consistency with local land use regulations and zoning requirements, as well as compatible with surrounding uses. MBA will examine the project relative to all of its proposed land use approvals. Mineral Resources. MBA will evaluate potential impacts on any existing or potential mineral resources, using data from the State Department of Conservation and the Office of the State Geologist. Noise. Using the project noise study, MBA will first evaluate short-term noise impacts from construction activities. Where information is readily available, typical noise levels associated with the types of earth -moving equipment, trucks and other construction activities will be quantified with respect to the distance from such activities to the nearest sensitive receptors. Roadway noise levels along local surrounding streets will be calculated based on current traffic volume data to be provided by the project traffic report and on the number of daily truck trips involved in the maximum intensity of daily grading or construction activities. Substantial reliance will be placed upon ability to comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. If necessary, additional measures to minimize construction noise impacts at affected sensitive receptor sites will be identified. Population and Housing. The project will add over a thousand residents and, therefore, has the potential to induce additional population growth through the construction of new housing in nearby areas. MBA will evaluate these potential impacts. Public Services. MBA will work with City staff and/or other service providers as appropriate to evaluate direct and indirect impacts of the project on existing or planned public services (e.g., police, fire, recreation, etc). Transportation and Circulation. MBA will use the data from the project traffic study (see Task 2) to evaluate the traffic and Level of Service (LOS) impacts of the project on surrounding roadways. The EIR will also address regional and cumulative traffic impacts. MBA will incorporate mitigation from the traffic study or additional measures to reduce traffic impacts to less than significant levels. Utilities and Service Systems. MBA will use data from the project engineer as well as contacting local service and utility providers to determine potential impacts of the project on water, sewer, electricity, natural gas, or solid waste systems. Water Supply Assessment. MBA assumes the developer will obtain the necessary SB 221 and SB 610 documentation relative to a guaranteed water supply. MBA Proposal for the Park Hill Project EIR in the City of San Jacinto SCOPE OF WORK Project Alternatives. Based on any potential impacts identified for the project, or alternative project scenarios to be considered by the Applicant or the City, MBA will develop appropriate alternatives to reduce or eliminate significant impacts. MBA will evaluate up to three alternatives plus a no -project (no development) alternative, no project (General Plan) alternative, and an alternative project site. The Applicant and the City will assist MBA in developing criteria and a location for appropriate alternative project site or sites. Mandatory Findings of Significance. MBA will summarize the results of the environmental analyses to determine if any direct or indirect impacts of the project will cause significant harm to natural or man-made resources, consistent with the latest requirements of CEQA. Cumulative Impacts. MBA will work in conjunction with the City Planning staff to develop a cumulative projects list. MBA will also use the most recent changes in CEQA to analyze potential cumulative impacts of development in the surrounding area, including the proposed project. MBA will also examine any potentially growth -inducing impacts of the project. Products. MBA will submit five (5) copies of a Screencheck EIR document to City staff for review and comment, including preparation and incorporation of technical studies. Task 4: Draft EIR Following receipt of final staff comments on the Screencheck EIR, MBA staff will revise the document to produce a Draft EIR document suitable for circulation and 45-day public review. MBA assumes a maximum of two review cycles with compiled comments from City staff to convert the screencheck document to a draft document suitable for circulation. Additional review cycles will require an adjustment to the contract. The Notice of Completion (NOC) for the Draft EIR will be filed with the State Clearinghouse with the Draft EIR. The Notice of Availability (NOA) of the Draft EIR will be sent via first class mail to agencies and other parties to notify them that the Draft EIR is available for review at the City. Products. MBA will provide 70 printed copies of the Draft EIR for public distribution, including appendices. MBA will distribute the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse, and up to 20 local public agencies. Additional copies will be made available at the City. The use of electronic versions of the document on CDs for all or portions of the EIR can reduce the direct expenses associated with this project. MBA will work with the City to evaluate the appropriateness of electronic distribution for use on this project. Task 5: Final EIR MBA staff will review all written comments submitted by agencies or the public during the 45-day review period. MBA will then prepare written the Response to Comments document, Environmental Findings, and a SOC, if needed, for the proposed action. MBA will also prepare a mitigation program suitable for adoption by the City. Response to Comments. MBA will prepare a Response to Comments document that will include responses to substantive issues raised on the Draft EIR, and include annotated comment letters. Up to 80 hours of professional staff time have been budgeted for this task. Overly voluminous or detailed comments may require additional time and a contract amendment. MBA will submit five (5) copies of the draft Response to Comments document. MBA Proposal for the Park Hill Project EIR In the City of San Jacinto SCOPE OF WORK Upon receipt of City comments, MBA will revise the Response to Comments document and produce up to 70 copies. MBA will distribute the Response to Comments document to public agencies that provided comments on the Draft EIR. Additional copies will be made available at the City. Environmental Findings. MBA will prepare the written findings for each significant effect identified in the EIR, pursuant to Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Section 21081 of CEQA), and the SOC, pursuant to Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The City will provide the format for this document. This document will be attached to the resolutions and ordinances prepared by the City. MBA will prepare draft findings for each significant effect identified in the EIR and prepare a SOC; if unavoidable significant impacts occur. As required by the State CEQA Guidelines, one of three findings must be made for each significant effect and must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The SOC will rely on input from the City and the project applicant regarding the benefits of the project. The Draft Environmental Findings will be submitted for review via email and up to two printed copies will be provided. Upon receipt of City comments, the Draft Environmental Findings will be revised and resubmitted by email for City use in considering the project. Up to 80 hours of professional staff time have been budgeted for this task. Extensive revisions that require additional time may result in the need for a contract amendment. MBA understands this will be an important consideration for this project because there are three separate development applications and will prepare three separate findings packages if necessary to assist in the processing of this project. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan. This task includes preparation of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) or program consistent with City procedures and standards. For each measure, the responsible party, implementation actions, and confirmation of action will be indicated. MBA will prepare a MMRP for each project complying with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. MBA will prepare a draft MMRP in accordance with the City and CEQA requirements. The MMRP will be designed to ensure compliance with adopted mitigation requirements during project implementation. In coordination with City staff, MBA will prepare the MMRP for mitigation measures that address potentially significant impacts. The program will be designed to fit into the City's existing entitlement and project review process. The City will provide the format. MBA will coordinate with staff to refine the MMRP content and format, prior to preparing the draft MMRP. After review and comment on the draft MMRP, MBA will revise the MMRP; according to the comments provided, and will submit the document by email, and also provide up to two (2) printed copies. MBA understands this will be an important consideration for this project because there are three separate development applications. MBA will prepare three separate MMRPs if necessary to assist in the processing of this project. Notice of Determination. The Notice of Determination (NOD) will be filed in person with the San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board within five (5) days of the project approval. The City will provide the funds necessary for the CFDG filing fees at the time of the filing of the NOD. Following filing with the Clerk of the Board, the NOD will be sent via overnight mail the State Clearinghouse for posting. Task 6: Meeting and Management MBA plans to meet with City staff approximately five (5) times during preparation of the EIR. Meetings may be used to plan scoping, discuss project alternatives, and solve problems. MBA Proposal for the Park Hill Project EIR in the City of San Jacinto SCOPE OF WORK Three public hearings are also anticipated (one on the Draft EIR and two on the actual review of the project). This task covers MBA attendance and preparation for three (3) public meetings for the project manager and one other MBA staff member. Attendance by technical experts is not currently provided, but will be evaluated based upon written comments on the project. MBA will also participate in a local or public scoping meeting based on discussions with City staff as to the need and/or format of such a meeting. This task addresses internal project management, management of technical experts, management of tasks, schedule and budget. As a regular part of MBA's project management process, we would communicate regularly with City staff either on the telephone or via e-mail, giving them a regular status of the project, and schedule. MBA will manage the preparation of the EIR and maintain close communication among City staff and project team members. This task is intended to ensure that the project is running on time, is within budget, is technically correct, and is legally defensible. 10 AGE\DA TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for meeting of 3 - G� [CC or RDA] [date] Lv s I -03 -O9 . (short title — include Resol - or Ord No. ) Consent Calendar Item (3.) Public Hearing Item (4.): Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s)) Staff Reports Item (5.) `'Attachments include: A. B. C. Other: _ Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy _ Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: DATE: ) - . 1 - C). S:ACity Clerk\Agenda - CC Transmittal Form.doc AGENDA ITEM 3 a March 6, 2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Connie Rogers -Elmore, Interim Finance DirectoL VIA: Sandy McKay, Special Districts Administrator5r' SUBJECT: Resolution for LLPD No. 1 Annual Assessments for FY 2008-09 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve and adopt the following Resolution of Initiation ordering the District Engineer to prepare and file a report related to the maintenance of public improvements in the City of San Jacinto LLPD No. 1 for the FY 2008-2009 Property Tax Roll. BACKGROUND: The consulting Civil Engineering firm of GFB-Friedrich, Inc. serves as the assessment / district engineer. The Assessment District is divided into five zones with assessments involving over 9,000 individual parcels. A Resolution of Initiation sets the assessment procedure in action for the FY 2008-2009 tax roll to be adopted on or about July 2008. No new parcels are being annexed into LLPD No. 1, with the exception of those tracts or APNs already conditioned to join or infill projects in the older areas. Staff will present, when available, the Engineer's Report for approval and set a public hearing date for any public input. Should there be no majority protest, City Council may then adopt a resolution confirming a diagram and authorizing the levy of assessments in LLPD No. 1 at a subsequent meeting. LLPD No. 1 is a pre Proposition 218 district that has no cost escalation clause. The maximum assessment cannot be increased without a vote of landowners. JUSTIFICATION: Initiates work on annual assessment district levy required by California Streets and Highways Code, Section 22622. BUDGETARY IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of Initiation — LLPD No. 1 Resolution No. Page 1 of 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO: A RESOLUTION OF INITIATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE DISTRICT'S ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND TO FILE A REPORT RELATED TO MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1, AND ANY ASSESSMENT THEREON FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 (LLPD NO. 1, FY 08-09 LEVY) WHEREAS, heretofore the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.1 was created pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (§22500, et. seq.); and WHEREAS, California Streets and Highways Code §22622 provides that this Council shall adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements in such a district and ordering the City Engineer, or designated District Engineer, to prepare and file a report related to annual maintenance and assessment in such a district; and WHEREAS, no new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for said Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows: Section 1: Section 2: The Recitals, as set forth in Part A of this Resolution, are in all respects true and correct. The City Engineer, or designated District Engineer, hereby is ordered and directed to prepare an annual report as specked in California Streets and Highways Code §§22565, et. seq., with respect to City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.1 for Fiscal Year 2008-09 Page 1 of 2 Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED, SIGNED and ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 2008: City of San Jacinto By: Jim Ayres, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, City of San Jacinto Best, Best & Krieger, LLP. CERTIFICATE I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held on the 6th day of March, 2008, by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 6th day of March, 2008. Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto State of California Page 2 of 2 AGENDA TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for C . meeting of [CC or RDA] [date] CA -Oct (short title — in Consent Calendar Item (3.) de Resol No. or Ord No. Public Hearing Item (4.): Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s)) Staff Reports Item (5.) ,---"Attachments include: A. B. C. Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: DATE: a ` 1-t S:\City Clerk\Agenda - CC Transmittal Form.doc Ckkiltr Arne], [Title] AGENDA ITEM 3. March 6, 2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Connie Rogers -Elmore, Interim Finance Director` VIA: Sandy McKay, Special Districts Administrator`s SUBJECT: Resolution for LLPD No. 2 Annual Assessments for FY 2008-09 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve and adopt the following Resolution of Initiation ordering the District Engineer to prepare and file a report related to the maintenance of public improvements in the City of San Jacinto LLPD No. 2 for the FY 2008-2009 Property Tax Roll. BACKGROUND: The Assessment District is divided among the original area and 80 annexation areas called zones with assessments involving over 7,200 individual parcels. A Resolution of Initiation sets the assessment procedure in action for the FY 2008-2009 tax roll to be adopted on or about July 2008. Staff will present, when available, the Engineer's Report for approval and set a public hearing date for any public input. Should there be no majority protest, City Council may then adopt a resolution confirming a diagram and authorizing the levy of assessments in LLPD No. 2 at a subsequent meeting. LLPD No. 2 is a post Proposition 218 district. In future years, assessments could be increased by the CPI, not to exceed 7.5%, but never above the actual costs incurred to maintain the facilities of the district. JUSTIFICATION: Initiates work on the annual assessment district levy required by California Streets and Highways Code, Section 22622. BUDGETARY IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of Initiation-LLPD No. 2 Resolution No. Page 1 of 1 Approvals City Manager. Finance Director, L STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE DISTRICT'S ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND TO FILE A REPORT RELATED TO MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2, AND ANY ASSESSMENT THEREON FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 (LLPD NO. 2, FY 08-09 LEVY) WHEREAS, heretofore the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.2 was created pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code ( §22500, et. seq.); and WHEREAS, California Streets and Highways Code §22622 provides that this Council shall adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements in such a district and ordering the District's Engineer to prepare and file a report related to annual maintenance and assessment in such a district; and WHEREAS, no new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for said Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2); and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows: Section 1: Section 2: The Recitals, as set forth in this Resolution, are in all respects true and correct. The City Engineer, or designated District Engineer, hereby is ordered and directed to prepare an annual report as specified in California Streets and Highways Code §§22565, et. seq., with respect to City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.2 for Fiscal Year 2008-09. Page 1 of 2 Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED, SIGNED and ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 2008. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Best, Best & Krieger City Attorney, City of San Jacinto City of San Jacinto By: Jim Ayres, Mayor CERTIFICATE I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held on the 6h day of March 2008, by the following vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 6th day of January, 2008. Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto State of California Page 2 of 2 AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk 3113 Enclosure: Staff Report for C. meeting of 3/(/° [CC or RDA] (date) C4h4ki e, let, :Jo (name — brief escription) 7kRe,JsM7 Consent Calendar Item Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) City Departments Item Y Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. Re Sa B. ply Other: _ Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: _ Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Corn etlts: ViQL 9 a Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting l `" DATE: 212-31� [Name or Initials], [Title] S:\City Clerk\CC RPT 07\Blank AGENDA Transmittal Form.doc AGENDA ITEM �g March 6, 2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tim Hults, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution to Approve the Renaming of Tranquilo Court to Reeds Way RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve and or adopt Resolution No. granting the name change of Tranquilo Court to Reeds Way within Tract 31384, located on the east side of Lyon Avenue, approximately IA mile north of Cottonwood Avenue. BACKGROUND: A request was received for a street name change from Distinguished Homes due to a school district fund raising project. The proposed street name change is from the Mosaico Tract, Tract 31384. This tract was developed by Distinguished Homes and is currently under construction. DISCUSSION: The winner of this fundraising raffle was allowed to change the name of an existing street to a name of his or her own choice. The existing name is shown on a recorded map as Tranquilo Court. The proposed street name is Reeds Way. The street and highways code provides that the City Council by resolution can change the name of any given street. FISCAL IMPACT: None, as the request for the name change was by Distinguished Homes and the street signs for the street have yet to be installed. ALTERNATIVES: Approval: Approve the street name change as requested. Denial: Take no action, which would maintain the street name of Tranquilo Court. ATTACHMENTS: y Resolution No. a. Letter from Distinguished Homes requesting name change. Page 1 of 1 Approvals City Manager: Finance Direc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO RENAMING TRANQUILO COURT AS REEDS WAY WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto ("City") has policies and procedures for the naming of new streets proposed in the community; and WHEREAS, Tranquilo Court is a recorded paper street within Tract 31384 that has not yet been constructed; and WHEREAS, Distinguished Homes has requested that Tranquilo Court be renamed Reeds Way, after Ken Reeds, an Education Foundation Member, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows: A. Renaming of Tranquilo Court to Reeds Way is consistent with City Council Adopted policies to allow for street names to be changed; and B. Renaming of Tranquilo Court to Reeds Way is consistent with the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code for renaming streets. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution; enter same in the book of original Resolutions; and make a Minute of its adoption in the City's records and in the Minutes of the meeting when it was adopted. SECTION 3: The City Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the clerk of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors and the Riverside County Surveyor. SECTION 4: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded. Page 1 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, this day of by the following vote Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP City Attorney Page 2 of 2 City of San Jacinto By Jim Ayres, Mayor o DEVELOPMENT PLAN MOSAICO, TRACT NO. 31384 IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE VICINITY MAP N.TS. PLAN MIX PLAN I RAN 2 PLAN 5 NOTE: PLANS I. 2 NV 5 ARE ME -STORY HLfH. PINT I - 23 LNITS Q59 PLAN 2 - 52 1.413 1%32 RAN 5 - 56 WITS (407J TOTAL - 91 UNITS GRAPHIC SCALE o w too PoSTINSUSHED H0MES, 160 CU)SPRINGS ROAD, SUTE 250 ANAHEIM HILLS, CA R2608 1114) 637-4405 Pt10NE (114) 637-4406 FAX REP. PATTI GI LPSPIE LEGEND N1'/JOS Uriaaeatena (NMI OM Or IWO. IMP Me. lit VMS 110On4 COW( OF RIB. sure or Wagner Halladay MOSAICO TRACT NO. 31384 DEVELOPMENT PLAN ¢imx n Y.w Transmitted via U.S. Mail January 10, 2008 Mr. Habib Motlagh City of San Jacinto 248 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: Proposed Street Name Change for Tract 31384 Dear Habib: We received a request from Nancy Ayres a couple of months back to donate to her for school district fundraising purposes a raffle to change one of the existing street names at the Mosaico, Tract 31384 project allowing the winner of the raffle to change the name from the existing name of Tranquilo Court to a name of his/her choice. There was indeed a winner who is now interested in changing the street name from Tranquilo Court to Reeds Way. Although this project is currently under construction, this street does not have current construction, completed houses nor homeowners occupying it at this time. I spoke with staff regarding the procedure that would need to be followed to make the street name change. Dave Ross's first request was to submit a letter and site plan to you formally requesting the street name change. Please accept this letter as our formal request to revise the street name from its current name of Tranquilo Court to its new name Reeds Way. I will work together with staff to follow the correct procedures with the City of San Jacinto and the County of Riverside to record a Notice of Correction to the recorded Final Map. I have attached a site plan indicating the location of the street proposed and also the email correspondence from Nancy Ayres requesting the donation. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. I appreciate your help with this matter and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, DITINGUISHED J-TOMES, INC. ega hieldon Proj t Manager Cc: Dave Ross Nancy Ayres Jim Ayres Attachments DISTI GUISU[D NO Kc.S 160 S. Old Springs Road, Suite 250, Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 • Phone (714) 637-4405 • Fax (714) 637-4406 AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report fq - meeting of ® L, Lv}S7 [CC or RDA] (date) %ES7 F— <41-?4?F'I`i t- FDA - (name — brief description) L' Co sent Calendar Item S 7,7.eE7 /' rJnjr/L- ublic Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) City Departments Item Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. B. C. Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting %ter ;' ' L/1''f DATE: 2 2-( [Name or Initials], [Title] S:\City Clerk\CC RPT 07\Blank AGENDA Transmittal Form.doc AGENDA ITEM 3 March 6, 2008 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Barry McClellan, City Manager 'f SUBJECT: Request for Appropriation to Purchase Street Banners for Ramona Pageant RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, appropriate $2500 from the General Fund contingency reserve for the purchase of banners to promote the Ramona Pageant. BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of February 21, 2008, Council discussed supporting the Ramona Pageant by funding up to $5000 to host the Ramona Parade on Friday, April 11, 2008. Subsequently, it has been decided not to hold that parade because the evening timing on a weeknight is problematic. DISCUSSION: Funds in the amount of $5000 were appropriated to purchase street banners in the current budget. The patriotic street banners now displayed were purchased from that fund. There is a balance of less than $2000 in that account. The Special Events committee recommended that banners promoting the Ramona Pageant be purchased that could be used every year. Now that the parade will not be held, it is requested that Council appropriate $2500 to purchase additional banners to promote the Ramona Pageant. These banners will not have specific dates and can be used for several years. The banners cost approximately $100 each. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Appropriate $2500 to purchase additional banners. 2. Appropriate a higher or lesser amount. 3. Do not appropriate additional funds. Page 1 of 2 Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: FISCAL IMPACT: This appropriation, if approved, would reduce the General Fund contingency reserve by $2500. There would be adequate funds remaining in the contingency reserve for the balance of the fiscal year. Page 2 of 2 AGENDA TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for L-(-._ meeting of 3 -( ^ [CC or RDA] [date] (short title — include Resol No. or Ord No. _) Consent Calendar Item (3.) Public Hearing Item (4.): Notice required ✓ yes no Copy attached yes no Published 2/2 (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s)) _ Staff Reports Item (5.) Attachments include: _ Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: DATE: _05f S:\City Clerk\Agenda - CC Transmittal Fonmdoc AGENDA ITEM March 6, 2008 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: LLPD No. 2, Annexation 75 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Staff recommends that the City Council by motion, approve and adopt the following Resolutions annexing property (commonly known as San Jacinto Unified School District — APN 435-261-006 and 435-261-010) into LLPD No. 2, Annexation No. 75: a. Resolution No. Initiating Proceedings for the Annexation of Property to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (Annexation No. 75) b. Resolution No. Approving the Engineer's Report for the Annexation of Property to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (Annexation No. 75). c. Resolution No. Declaring Intention to Annex Property to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (Annexation No. 75). 2. Conduct Public Hearing and at the conclusion of the public hearing if the City Council determines that a majority protest does not exist, by motion, approve and adopt Resolution No. Ordering Annexation of Territory to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 and Levying Assessments. Page 1 of 3 BACKGROUND: In connection with the development of property owned by the San Jacinto Unified School District in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside (APN 435-261-006 and 435-261-010), the City has required that the property be annexed to LLPD No. 2 to finance the cost of maintaining and servicing various improvements that will benefit the property within that development. The property proposed to be annexed to the district will receive the special benefit of the improvements and will be assessed to pay the costs of installation, operation, maintenance and/or servicing of street lights, traffic signals, landscaped areas, municipal parks, drainage facilities, graffiti removal and incidental expenses of the assessment district. DISCUSSION: Staff is recommending that the City Council take all action that is necessary to annex the property to LLPD No. 2 during the City Council meeting on March 6, 2008. The owners of the property proposed to be annexed to LLPD No. 2 have waived all notice requirements pertaining to these annexation proceedings and have agreed to conduct the public hearing on any date deemed advisable by the City Council. The first step is to adopt the Resolution Initiating Proceedings, which initiates the annexation process by ordering the Engineer of Record, GFB-Friedrich & Associates, Inc., to prepare the Engineer's Report, describing in detail the improvements to be financed by the assessment district, the estimated cost of such improvements and the special benefits that the property within the assessment district will receive. The next step in the annexation proceedings is to adopt a resolution approving the Engineer's Report and a resolution declaring the City Council's intention to annex the property to LLPD No. 2. The resolution of intention also schedules the public hearing on the annexation and the levy of the assessments upon the property proposed to be annexed to the District. The purpose of the public hearing is to hear testimony from any interested persons and to consider objections or protests, if any, to the proposed assessments. As required by the Act, notices and assessment ballots have been mailed to the record owner of the property proposed to be annexed to the District with instructions to vote and return the ballot to the City before the conclusion of the public hearing on March 6, 2008. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council should direct the City Clerk to tally the assessment ballots submitted and to determine whether a majority protest exists. A majority protest exists if assessment ballots submitted in opposition to the proposed assessments exceed assessment ballots submitted in favor of the proposed assessments. If a Page 2 of 3 majority protest exists, the City may not annex the property to the District or levy the assessments. If a majority protest does not exist, the City Council may proceed with the recommended action described above. If annexed, the District would finance the cost of maintaining and servicing various improvements that will benefit the property proposed to be annexed to the District, including street lights, traffic signals, landscaping, drainage facilities and graffiti removal. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Continue item or take no action. FISCAL IMPACT: No cost is attributed to this action. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Nos. and Page 3 of 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO INITIATING PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY (COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, APN 435-261-006 AND 435-261-010) TO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 (LLPD NO. 2) ANNEXATION NO. 75 AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT (LLPD NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 75) WHEREAS, it has been determined by the City Council ("City Council") of the City of San Jacinto ("City") that the public interest, convenience and necessity require the installation, operation, maintenance and/or servicing of street lights, traffic signals, graffiti removal, landscape, drainage facilities and any improvements appurtenant thereto, as set forth in Section 22535 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that, to finance such facilities and the maintenance and servicing thereof, certain property that will receive benefit from the maintenance and servicing of such facilities should be annexed to existing Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto ("District"); and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annexation of such property to the District are authorized by and will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has also determined that proceedings for the levy of assessments on such property to pay the costs of the maintenance and servicing of such facilities during fiscal year 2007-08 should also be conducted pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 22620) of Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council proposes to annex certain property to the District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 25000) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 2. Improvements. The Improvements which shall be provided for Page 1 of 3 the property proposed to be annexed to the District by and through the assessments levied annually thereon shall include the following: (a) the installation or construction of public lighting, facilities, including, but not limited to, street lights; (b) the installation or planting of landscaping, including, but not limited to, street trees, parkways, and median islands; (c) the installation or construction of park or recreational facilities; (d) the installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any improvements listed in (a) through (d) or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof including, but not limited to, irrigation, drainage, and electrical facilities; and (e) the maintenance and servicing of any of the foregoing. SECTION 3. The property to be specifically charged for the maintenance and servicing of such improvements shall include all of the land located within APN 435-261-006 and 435-261-010, in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and shall be designated "Annexation No. 75 to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2". SECTION 4. The property described in Exhibit "A" which is proposed to be included within the proposed boundaries of Annexation No. 75 to the District may be presently included in Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 of the City of San Jacinto. Upon the completion of proceedings for the annexation of such property to the District it shall be detached from such other district. SECTION 5. GFB — Friedrich and Associates, Inc., the Districts engineer ("Engineer"), is ordered to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code with respect to the annexation of the property described in Section 3 hereof to the District and the levy of assessments on such property to pay the costs of the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in Section 2 hereof during fiscal year 2007-08. Upon completion, Page 2 of 3 the Engineer shall file said report with the City Clerk of the City Council for submission to the City Council. ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 6th day of March, 2008, by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstained: ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk, APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, City of San Jacinto Best, Best & Krieger, LLP City of San Jacinto By, Jim Ayres, Mayor Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A Annexation No. 75 to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 Legal Description Assessor Parcel Number: 435-261-006 and 435-261-010 A-1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 (LLPD NO. 2) OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO (COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — APN 435-261-006 AND 435-261- 010) (LLPD NO. 2, ANNEXATION NO. 75) WHEREAS, on March 6, 2008, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto ("City Council"), adopted Resolution No. initiating proceedings for the annexation of property to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto ("District") and ordered GFB - Friedrich and Associates Inc., the Engineer of Record, to prepare and file a report in accordance with Section 22565 of the California Streets and Highways Code ("Code"); and WHEREAS, the Engineer of Record has filed with the City Clerk its report ("Engineer's Report") containing the matters specified in Section 22565 through 22574 of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Engineer's Report has been duly presented by the City Clerk to the City Council for consideration and has been fully considered by the City Council, and this City Council finds that each and every part of the Engineer's Report is sufficient, and that no portion of the report requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows: SECTION 1. SECTION 2. The Engineer's estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of the installation, operation, maintenance and/or servicing of street lights, traffic signals, graffiti removal, landscaping, drainage facilities and any improvements appurtenant thereto and the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in the Engineer's Report shall be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. The diagrams showing the property proposed to be annexed to the District referred to and described in the Engineer's Report and the boundaries of the property proposed to be annexed to said District as the same existed at the time of passage of Resolution No. , are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. Page 1 of 2 SECTION 3. SECTION 4. SECTION 5. ADOPTED, following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: The proposed assessments upon the property proposed to be annexed to the District are in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said property, respectively, from said improvements and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in the Engineer's Report. Said Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings for Annexation No. 75 to the District. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof. SIGNED AND APPROVED this 6th day of March, 2008, by the Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, City of San Jacinto Best, Best & Krieger, LLP. City of San Jacinto By, Jim Ayres, Mayor Page 2 of 2 ENGINEER'S REPORT Annexation No. 75: CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 Preliminary Date: March 6, 2008 Confirmed Date: March 6, 2008 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, this report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. This report presents the engineering analysis for Annexation No. 75 to the district known as LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 in the CITY OF SAN JACINTO (hereinafter referred to as "District"). This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of street lights and traffic signals; the installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaped areas (parkways, medians, open space, detention/retention basins, etc.); the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of municipal parks; the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of drainage facilities; and graffiti removal from horizontal and vertical surfaces which are appurtenant to the above items; all of which are located in public rights -of -way or easements in the District. Reference is hereby made to the: ENGINEER'S REPORT Formation of CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 Fiscal Year 2002-2003, that was confirmed on April 4, 2002, and is hereinafter referred to as the "Master Engineer's Report," which is hereby incorporated herein as though set forth in full. BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT The proposed boundary of Annexation No. 75 to the District is completely within the City Limits of the City of San Jacinto and is shown on the Boundary Map (attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference and on file in the office of the City Clerk at the San Jacinto City Hall). Exhibit "A" serves as the Assessment Diagram for Zone 75 of the District and a copy of said Exhibit "A" may be found in the Appendix to this Report. The LLPD No. 2 - Engineer's Report 1 Annexation No. 75 boundary includes the parcels of land that are located in the vicinity of street lighting, landscaping, drainage and/or park improvements that were, or soon will be, installed as a condition of approval of a land development project; the operation and maintenance of which will be funded by this assessment district. All parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on maps on file in the Riverside County Assessor's office or by a tract and parcel number legal description. Zones The 1972 Act provides for areas within a district to be classified into different zones. Annexation No. 75 to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 is comprised of one zone. The costs of the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of the various improvements and facilities within this zone, will be separately determined, and incidental costs will be prorated and added to determine the total cost. This zone is comprised of the San Jacinto Unified School District's Nutrition Center and is designated as Zone 75. Future annexations will be assigned Zone designations; e.g. Zone 76, Zone 77, Zone 77A, Zone 78, etc., as appropriate. IMPROVEMENTS The authorized facilities and items of servicing and maintenance are described in the "Master Engineer's Report." Said description is included within this report by reference. A copy of said "Master Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto and may be reviewed, or a copy obtained, at City Hall during noinnal business hours. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Zone 75 Improvements The improvements included in Zone 75 to be installed, operated, serviced, and maintained are street lighting and traffic signals. Also included is the servicing and maintenance required for graffiti removal. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications showing and describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be operated and maintained within Annexation No. 75 are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are incorporated herein by reference. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The estimated annual cost requirements for Zone 75, for the improvements described in the "Improvements" section of this report, are summarized in Exhibit "B," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, in the Appendix to this report. Estimated costs are shown for each improvement or facility, and for incidental costs to be funded by the District. LLPD No. 2 - Engineer's Report 2 Annexation No. 75 Notes: 1. Incidental Costs are prorated in proportion to the respective servicing and maintenance costs in each Zone (or sub -zone). Future annexations will be treated in a similar manner. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The net amount to be assessed upon lands within the District in accordance with this report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the total assessments among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefit to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements. Said method is described in the "Master Engineer's Report" and is included within this report by reference. A copy of said "Master Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto and may be reviewed, or a copy obtained, at City Hall during normal business hours. ASSESSMENT FORMULA The basic formula used to calculate the amount allocated to each lot or parcel within the District for each type of improvement or facility is described in the "Master Engineer's Report." Said formula, including but not limited to, the table entitled "ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD," and subsections entitled Special Benefit Analysis, Street Classification and corresponding General Benefit (%), and Assessment of Public Property is included within this report by reference. LIMITATION ON INCREASE OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT The City Council intends to increase assessments, on an annual basis when necessary, in accordance with the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles - Anaheim -Riverside area, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; provided however, that any such annual increase shall not exceed seven and one-half percent (7.5%). The current Southern California telephone number for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) Hotline is (310) 235-6884. ASSESSMENT SPREAD The individual Zone 75 assessments, tabulated by Assessor's Parcel Number or other form of identification, are shown on the Assessment Spread on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto and attached hereto as Exhibit "C." The total cost of the improvements described in the "Improvements" section of the report for Annexation No. 75 for fiscal year 2007-2008 is estimated to be $5,588.86. The maximum annual assessment for each of four parcels for the 2007-2008 fiscal year is therefore: APN 435-261-006 APN 435-261-010 LLPD No. 2 - Engineer's Report $ 2,384.90 $ 3,203.96 3 Annexation No. 75 LLPD No. 2 - Engineer's Report 4 & ASSOC., JOIIN A. FRIEDRICII, P.E. Date: 2 Q j Annexation No. 75 APPENDIX EXHIBITS Exhibit "A" — Boundary Map Exhibit "B" — Cost Estimate Exhibit "C" — Assessment Spread / / .,7 77 A ' II .135-26I -1)06 / A ''' '''''---- \ / / / \ \ D I o z \ 0/a , , \ A ID .43E-26 -010 )r . \ 4)),\ \ )- /32 / P DI ON AVE SCOVELL AVE EXHIBIT "A" BOUNDARY MAP LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 75 for the CITY OF SAN JACINTO FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 ZONE 75 VICINITY MAP 20 THE DSDDSCITEDI IIIIIRDAD FOR EACH RDA , 1140000 5I0021 102...TR, IS IND ASSE,DIDA 4,11CLL 4,,NED Pl COUNTY INYTY,OD. 11.11rA, Inc (FOES AND 1111666110/10 FUN ADC,/ ROI DR PaRcH, ,N11 015-1PICT S1101, CD 111! AC:ADAMS 'IDLE; WPC ON 11LD 16 111( 11110R 111 TIE DTDESANC DOW, 15015511 LEGEND SYNT UNIT - DX1CD, 5,CCI LICUT .1T5D5D1,111 ,ANDADY SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NUTRITION CENTER A 1111 415,2E1 -005 & 435-261-111n SCALE imp"slo""rimarea 0411211.1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 Annexation No. 75 (Zone 75) COST ESTIMATE Item Ouanfity Unit Unit Cosh Month Street Lights Park Maintenance Landscape Maintenance Storm Drain Maint. Graffiti Removal TOTALS j Cost/Mo. Costar. CosUMo. Cos1/Yr. Cost/Mo. Coot/Yr. Coot/Ms. CosUYr. Cost/Mo. Cost/Yr. Per Month Per Year SJUSD Nutrition Center Street Lights and Traffic Signal Street Lights 9,500 lumen (In -tract) 7 Ec. $9.62 !ma $67.34 $808.08 $67.34 $808.08 Less General Benefit: 59.62/Lights x 4 Lights = ($38.48) ($461.76) ($38.48) (5461.76) Traffic Signal - Cottonwood Ave $4 State St Maintenance Cost 1 L.S.lMo. $219.17 $219.17 $2,630.04 $219.17 $2,630.00 Energy Cost t$55/Signal/Month) 1 L.S./Mo. $55.00 $55.00 $660.00 $55.00 $660.00 Less General Benefit (60% for "Pass -through" Traffic and 30% for the non -project segments surrounding the signal = 90%) ($246.75) ($2,961.04) ($246.75) ($2,961.04) Note: Assessments for the future traffic signal shall not be collected until said signal is instated. Landscape Maintenance - None - 0 S.F. $0.150 /yr $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Graffiti Removal 1 L.S. $100 Imo $100.00 $1,200.00 100.00 1,200.00 Subtotal, Maintenance and Servicing $56.28 $675.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 $1,200.00 $156.28 $1,875.32 Contingency(10%) $5.63 $67.53 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10.00 $120.00 $15.53 $187.53 TOTAL, Maintenance and Servicing $01.90 $742.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $110.00 $1,320.00 $171.90 $2,002.86 Incidental Costs Assessment Engineer 1 L.S. 775 I yr $23.26 $279.09 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $41.33 S495.91 $64.58 $775.00 Legal counsel 1 L.S. 0 / yr , $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 City Administration 1 I.S. 725 / yr $21.76 $261.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $38.66 $463.92 $60.42 $725.00 City Inspection Costs 1 L.S. 500 / yr , $15.00 $180.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $26.66 $319.94 $41.67 $500.00 NPDES Costs 1 L.S. 700 / yr $21.01 S252.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $37.33 $447.92 $58.33 $700.00 County Collection Fees 1 L.S. 176 / yr $5.28 $63.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9.39 $112.62 $14.67 $176.00 Miscellaneous 1 L.S. 175 /yr $600 $72.02 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10.66 $127.98 $16.67 $200.00 Reserve Fund 1 L.S. 390 / yr $13.50 $162.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $24.00 $287.95 $37.50 $450.00 TOTAL, Incidental Costs $3,441 /yr $105.81 S1,269.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.60 $188.02 $2,256.25 $293.83 $3,526.00 Contributions to the District Developer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT TO ASSESSMENT $157.72 $2 012.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $298.02 $3,576.25 $465.74 $5,588.86 Assessment per Lot= Varies Refer to Exhibit "C," Assessment Spread February 13. 2008 R_1 Caaetl,lr npn CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 Annexation No. 75 (Zone 75) ASSESSMENT SPREAD Parcel Identification (APN) Property Owner Name Proposed Land Use Code Assessable Acreage (acres) Asmt. Units (AU) Street Lights Park Maint. Landscape Maint. Storm Drain Maint. Graffiti Removal Dollars per AU ($) Assessment per Parcel ($) SJUSD Nutrit on Center 435-261-006 San Jacinto Unified School District C1 0.99 2.97 $858.83 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,526.07 $803.00 $2,384.90 435-261-010 San Jacinto Unified School District C1 1.33 3.99 $1,153.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,050.18 $803.00 $3,203.96 SJUSD Nutrition Center TOTALS 2.32 6.96 $2,012.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,576.25 $5,588.86 Current Ownership: San Jacinto Unified School District, a School District Address: 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583 C-1 Developer: Same Exhibit "C" STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DECLARING INTENTION TO ANNEX PROPERTY TO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 (LLPD NO. 2), TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS ON SUCH PROPERTY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 AND PROVIDING NOTICE OF TIME AND PLACE OF A HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS, DETERMINING DURATION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND ANNUAL INCREASES IN AMOUNTS THEREOF AND PROVIDING FOR ELECTION THEREON FOR THE PROPERTY (COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, APNS 435-261-006 AND 435-261-010) (LLPD NO. 2, ANNEXATION NO. 75) WHEREAS, the City Council ("City Council") of the City of San Jacinto ("City") has initiated proceedings for the annexation of certain property to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto ("District"), pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code ("Act'), for the installation, operation, maintenance and/or servicing of street lights, traffic signals, graffiti removal, landscaping, drainage facilities and any improvements appurtenant thereto as provided in Section 22525 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, as ordered by the City Council, GFB - Friedrich and Associates, Inc. has filed with the City Clerk a report regarding the assessments which are proposed to be levied and collected from the owners of assessable property within the District to pay the costs of the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of street lighting, traffic signals, graffiti removal and improvements appurtenant thereto, and that report has been presented to and considered by the City Council; and WHEREAS, upon the annexation of such property to the District, and to the extent such property is included within Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 and the assessments levied thereby finance the such improvements provided by the District, it should be detached from Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1. WHEREAS, it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution of intention pursuant to Section 22587 of the Streets and Highways Code to, among other things, fix and give notice of the time and place of a public hearing on said report, the proposed annexation of such property to the District and the proposed assessments. Page 1 of 6 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto finds that: (a) The foregoing recitals are true and correct; (b) The report of GFB - Friedrich and Associates, Inc. (the "Report") contains all matters required by Sections 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code and may, therefore, be approved by the City Council; (c) The assessments, which are proposed to be levied for fiscal year 2007-08 on all parcels of assessable property that are proposed to be annexed to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2, are based on special benefit conferred upon each such parcel from the payment of the cost of the installation, operation, maintenance and/or servicing of street lighting, traffic signals, graffiti removal, landscaping, drainage facilities and appurtenant improvements; (d) The proportionate special benefit derived by each such parcel has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of street lighting, traffic signals, graffiti removal, landscaping, drainage facilities and appurtenant improvements; and (e) The amount of the assessment which is proposed to be assessed on each such parcel is based upon and will not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. SECTION 2. Intention. The City Council declares that it intends to annex the property described in Section 4 to the District, to detach such property from Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1, and to levy assessments on all lots and parcels of assessable property which are proposed to be annexed to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto for fiscal year 2007-08 in the amount set forth in the Report. Such assessments will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as county taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of Page 2 of 6 SECTION 3. county taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. Improvements. The Improvements which shall be provided for the property proposed to be annexed to the District by and through the assessments levied annually thereon shall include the following: (a) the installation or construction of public lighting, facilities, including, but not limited to, street lights; (b) the installation or planting of landscaping, including, but not limited to, street trees, parkways, and median islands; (c) the installation or construction of park or recreational facilities; (d) the installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any improvements listed in (a) through (d) or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof including, but not limited to, irrigation, drainage, and electrical facilities; and (e) the maintenance and servicing of any of the foregoing. SECTION 4. Annexation to Assessment District. The distinctive designation of the annexation is "Annexation No. 75 to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto." The property which is proposed to be annexed to the District and which comprises Annexation No. 75 is all the property which is identified by Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Number 435-261-006 and 435-261-010. Upon the completion of the annexation proceedings, the property which comprises Annexation No. 75 will be designated as Zone 75 of the District ("Zone 75"). The boundaries of Annexation No. 75 or Zone 75 are further described and shown in the Report. The territory included within Zone 75 is generally located in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside. Upon completion of the annexation proceedings, such territory shall be detached from existing Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1. SECTION 5. Report and Assessments. The Report, which is on file with the City Clerk of the City Council, and which has been presented to the City Council at the meeting at which this Page 3 of 6 resolution is adopted, is approved. Reference is made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the Improvements, the boundaries of Annexation No. 75 and the assessments which are proposed to be levied on the assessable lots and parcels of property within Zone 75 for fiscal year 2007-08. SECTION 6. Duration of Assessments and Inflation Increases and Election Thereon. The assessments shall be levied on all parcels of assessable property within Annexation No. 75 or Zone 75 of the District, as identified in the Report, so long as the assessments are necessary to finance the Improvements specified in Section 3 and the maintenance and servicing thereof. The assessment amounts contained in the Report shall be subject to an annual adjustment or increase in an amount equal to the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index — All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles — Anaheim — Riverside Area; provided however that the amount of the assessment to be levied on any assessable parcel in any fiscal year shall not be increased by more than seven and one—half percent (7.5%), and the amount of the assessment to be levied on any parcel in any fiscal year shall not in any event exceed the actual total cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The assessment ballots, which are to be mailed to the owners of assessable parcels of property in Annexation No. 75 or Zone 75, as provided in Section 8 hereof, shall clearly indicate that the property owners are voting on the duration of and annual increases in the amount of the assessments as specified above. SECTION 7. Hearing. The time and place of the hearing required by Section 22587 through 22594 of the Streets and Highways Code concerning the proposed annexation of the property described in Section 4 hereof to the District, the proposed detachment from Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1, and the assessments which are proposed to be levied for fiscal year 2007-08 is set for 7:00 p.m. on March 6, 2008, at the San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room, located at 2045 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California. SECTION 8. Notice of Hearing and Ballots. The City Clerk of the City Council shall mail notice of the proposed annexation and the proposed assessments and of the time and place of the public hearing, as specified in Section 7 hereof, to the record owner of each assessable parcel of property identified in the Page 4 of 6 Report. Such notice shall specify the total amount of the assessment chargeable to all the property within Annexation No. 75 or Zone 75 to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2, the amount chargeable to each owner's particular parcel, the duration of the assessments, the reason for the assessments and the basis upon which the amount of the proposed assessments was calculated, together with the date, time and location of the public hearing on the proposed assessments as specified in Section 7 hereof. The notice shall include, in a conspicuous place, thereon, a summary of the procedures applicable to the completion, return and tabulation of the assessment ballots, which will accompany the notice and shall include a statement that the existence of a majority protest will result in the assessments not being levied, and that a majority protest will exist if, upon the conclusion of the hearing, ballots submitted in opposition to the assessments exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessments. Each such notice mailed to owners of identified parcels within Annexation No. 75 or Zone 75 to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 shall contain a ballot which includes the City's address for receipt of any ballot when completed by any owner receiving such notice whereby each such owner may indicate his or her name, reasonable identification of the parcel and support or opposition to the proposed assessments. SECTION 9. That the Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof. Page 5 of 6 ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 6th day of March, 2008, by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, City of San Jacinto Best, Best & Krieger, LLP. City of San Jacinto By: Jim Ayres, Mayor Page 6 of 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (COMMONLY KNOWN AS SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — APNS 435-261-006 AND 435-261-010) TO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 (LLPD NO. 2) AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 (LLPD NO. 2, ANNEXATION NO. 75) WHEREAS, on March 6, 2008, the City Council ("City Council") of the City of San Jacinto ("City") adopted Resolution No. declaring its intention to annex certain territory to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 ("Assessment District"), which was designated for purposes of such proceedings as "Annexation No. 75" and "Zone 75," and scheduling a public hearing thereon; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. , the City Council approved the report of GFB-Friedrich and Associates, Inc., the Engineer of Record ("Report') which contained, among other matters, the proposed assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2007-08 upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the territory which comprises Annexation No. 75 to and Zone 75 of the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 53753 of the Government Code, notice of the proposed annexation and the proposed assessments and of the time and place of the public hearing thereon was mailed to the record owner of each parcel of property identified in the Report and further directed that each such mailed notice contain an assessment ballot upon which the property owner could indicate his or her support or opposition to the proposed assessments; and WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted the public hearing with respect to the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed to the Assessment District and has received a report from the City Clerk regarding the tabulation of the assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in support of or opposition to the proposed assessments advising that the ballots which were received were voted in favor of the proposed assessments and that a majority protest does not therefore exist; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. , the City Council determined that upon the annexation of such property to the Assessment District it should be detached from Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 to the extent the assessments levied thereby finance the same improvements provided for by the Assessment District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows: Page 1 of 5 SECTION 1. Findings. The findings recited in the preceding paragraphs are true and correct. SECTION 2. Assessment District. The Assessment District is Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto. The territory which is proposed to be annexed to the Assessment District and which comprises Annexation No. 75 is described in the Report and includes all of the property located at Assessor Parcel Number 435-261-006 and 435-261-010 in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside. SECTION 3. Improvements. The Improvements which shall be provided for the property proposed to be annexed to the District by and through the assessments levied annually thereon shall include the following: (a) the installation or construction of public lighting, facilities, including, but not limited to, street lights; (b) the installation or planting of landscaping, including, but not limited to, street trees, parkways, and median islands; (c) the installation or construction of park or recreational facilities; (d) the installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any improvements listed in (a) through (d) or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof including, but not limited to, irrigation, drainage, and electrical facilities; and (e) the maintenance and servicing of any of the foregoing. SECTION 4. Annexation; Designation of Zone; Detachment. The territory comprising Annexation No. 75, as described in Section 2 hereof, is annexed to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto. The diagram of the Assessment District, as modified to include Annexation No. 75 and as contained in the Report, is confirmed. Such annexed territory is designated as Zone 75 of the Assessment District. The territory comprising Annexation No. 75 and Zone 75 of the Assessment District shall be and is detached from Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 of the City of San Jacinto. Page 2 of 5 SECTION 5. SECTION 6. Levy of Assessments; Annual Increases; Duration. The assessments proposed to be levied on the lots and parcels within Zone 75 of the Assessment District for fiscal year 2007-08 in the amounts set forth in the Report and in the assessment ballot mailed to and returned by the owners of the property comprising Annexation No. 75 shall be and are confirmed and levied. Pursuant to Section 6 of Resolution No. , and as specified in such ballot, the annual amount of the assessment to be levied on each parcel of property in Zone 75 of the Assessment District shall be subject to an annual adjustment or increase in an amount equal to the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index -All Urban Consumers for Los Angeles - Anaheim - Riverside Area; provided, however, that the amount of the assessment to be levied on any parcel in any fiscal year shall not be increased by more than seven and one-half percent (7.5%) and the amount of the assessment to be levied on any parcel in any fiscal year shall not, in any event, exceed the actual total cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The assessments shall be levied annually on assessable lots and parcels of property in Zone 75 so long as the assessments are necessary to finance the cost of the operation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements specified in Section 3 within and for Zone 75. Filing With the County Auditor. The City Clerk shall cause the diagram and assessment as confirmed and levied hereby to be filed with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside as required by Section 22641 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 7. That the Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof. Page 3 of 5 ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 6th day of March, 2008, by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, City of San Jacinto Best, Best & Krieger, LLP. City of San Jacinto By: Jim Ayres, Mayor Page 4 of 5 Certificate of Election Official and Statement of Votes Cast STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) The undersigned, ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and Division 12, commencing with Section 17000 of the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 SPECIAL ELECTION ANNEXATION NO. 75 in the City, held on March 6, 2008. I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in the area proposed to be annexed to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto for or against the Measure are full, true and correct. VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION 1: WITNESS my hand this 6th day of March, 2008 YES NO Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto Page 5 of 5 HE r 'PRESS - ENTERPRISE CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING Printed' by: Lombera, Afma at: 2:22 pm on: Thursday, Feb 21, 2000 w Accoi, ntInfortnetion • ,LLff Phone #: (951) 487-7330 Name: SAN JACINTO, CITY OF Address: P 0 BOX 488 SAN JACINTO CA A'ect 4s 103537 Client: Placed by:1 SANDY McKAY Fax it: (951) 487-6779 Ad Information Classificationi Legals Publications:; Hemet -San Jacinto Zone Start date:( 02.23-08 Stop date 02-23-08 Insertions:/ 1 Rate code'` LP -city Ad"type 1 Ad Liner Taken by:r Lombera, Alma Size, 2x104.860 bill size 210.00x 5.14 agate lines Amount due.' " S145:50 92583 Ad #: 9092047 Ad Copy: NOTICE OF HEARING ON ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO (ANNEXATION NO. 75) AND ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED TO BE LEVI ED ON THAT PROPERTY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at 7:00 O'clock p.m. on September 6, 2007 In the San Jacinto Unified School Distrid Board Rooma12046 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto ('City') will conduct a public hearing regording the annexation of certain property, located at Southwest corner of Cottonwood Avenue and State Street In the City of Son Jacinto, County of Riverside, to Landscaping, Lighting and Pork District No. 2 (*Dishier) aS Annexation No. 75 which, If annexed, will become Zone 75 of the District, and the assessments which are proposed to be f levied on parcels of properly in Zone 75 for fiscal year 2007-01. According to the Citty s records you are the record owner of a , parcel or parcels of properly within Zone 75 which is or are i* subject to the levy of the proposed assessments. The total amount of the assessments which are proposed to be levied for fiscal year 2007.OS on parcels in Zone 75 Is 55,588.86. The amount of the annual assessment which is proposed to be ley - led on each parcel In Zone 75 Is as follows; Assessor Parcel Number Annual Assessment Amount Per Parcel 435-261-006 82,384.90 435-261-010 $3,203.96 The assessments areproposed to be levied to pathe annual cost of the lnstallaltory operation, maintenance and servicing of street lighting; traffic signals; parkway and•park/open space landsco ping; park facilities; and drainage facilities (pipe, catch basins, lunchon strudures, and connections to flood control channel). Also included Is graffiti removal, and any other ap• purtenam improvements firnprovements'9 In the District. The total amount of the assessments which are proposed to be levied on parcels of properly in Zane 75 Is equal to the r amount of the estimated annual Cool of the installation, opera- .4 Son, maintenance. and servicing of the Improvements within Zone 75 for the 2007.08 fiscal year. The amount of the assess. ment which is proposed to be levied on each parcel in Zone 75 h was calculated an the beers of the roportionete special benefit derived by the parcel In relationship to the entirety of the costs „' that ore related to installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of the Improvements for sold fiscal year and was de- 1 termined by dividing the estimated annual cast hy the number of units of benefit' Within Zone 75. The assessments will be le'v led on all parcels within Zone 75 so long as such assessments are necessary to pay the annual cost of the installotionc opera - Non, maintenance and servicing of the Improvements in Zone 75. ry II ri it ii { The City Council has determined that the amount of the os- sessment which will be levied per parcel far each parcel in Zane 75 In future fiscal years may be increased by the percenioge Increase In the Consumer Price Index • All Urban Consumers for the Las Angeles•Anahelm•Riverside Area provided that the amount of the assessment is not increased by marathon seven end one-half percent 0 p96) in any Fiscal year and provided that the amount of the assessment to be levied on any parcel in any fiscal year shall not In any event exceed the reasonable Costs of the proportional speclal benefit conferred on the parcel, Property owners who vote Assessment Ballots In support (lithe levy of the proposed assessment will also be voting in support of such on incree seta the annual amount of assessments to be levied In future fiscal years. At the conclusion of the public hearth , the City Clerk will tabulate the assessment ballots submitte and not withdrawn, in support of or opposition to the levy of t e proposed assess- ments. A majority protest will exist d the assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, In apposition to the levy of the proposed assessments mesa the assessment ballots submit- ted, and not withdrawn, in favor of the levy of the proposed as- sessments, weighting those assessment ballots by the amount of the proposed assessment to he imposed upon the identified parcel for which each assessment ballot Is submitted. if there m Is a maority protest against the levy of the proposed assess- ments, the property will not be annexed to the District and the City Counciwill net levy the proposed assessments on parcels of property within the District, DATED: February 25, 2008 --- Page 1 --- /ulDorothy Cdoyulj,erk City of Son Jacinto 2123 474 W. Esplanade Ave. San Jacinto, CA 92583 951-763-3413 951-763-3410 Fax Z00/Z00lI QlI.OISSY'ID Ed ZaWRH 0TD££9LT56 xtta 6Z;LT ❑Hs 800Z/TZ/ZO AGENDA ITEM March 6, 2008 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Kevin Vest, Chief of Police VIA: Thomas Prill, General Accounting Manager SUBJECT: SB 621 Indian Gaming Impact Grant — Police Station Expansion RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the appropriation of $304,396.46 from SB 621 Indian Gaming Grant Fund for the Police Station Expansion Project. BACKGROUND The City of San Jacinto received $310,455 in FY 06-07 for the project and received approval for a transfer of $35,000 for the Fire Department portion of the grant, and after expenditures of $41,058.54, a total of $304,396.46 remained. In October 2007, approval was requested to have the remaining funds continued into FY 07-08, due to initial bids in excess of the funds available and a re -thinking of the project. When the FY 07-08 budget was approved, this project continuation was not captured by the Capital Projects Fund and was not originally budgeted. DISCUSSION The FY 07-08 budget did not account for the expenditure of the grant funds. Since the monies have been received, there is sufficient funding for the recommended appropriations. ALTERNATIVES 1) Approve the budget appropriations to expend grant monies. 2) Do not appropriate. Provide direction on the expenditure of grant monies. FISCAL IMPACT Appropriation and expenditure of SB 621 Indian Gaming Funds: Indian Gaming Grant Fund Acct. 068-4150-400.50-10 Transfer to CIP Fund Dr. $304,396.46 Capital Improvement Fund Acct. 199-0000-399.50-11 Transfer In from SB621 Cr. $304,396.46 Acct. 199-9999-425.40-01 Police Station Expansion Dr. $304,396.46 (Project #08-012) ATTACHMENTS Schedule of SB 621 Indian Gaming Impact Grant Funds Letter re: Continuation of Grant Funds Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO SCHEDULE OF SB 621 INDIAN GAMING IMPACT GRANT FUNDS PREPARED: SEPTEMBER 13, 2007 Revenue Expenses Remaining Revenue Expenses Remaining Revenue Adjust Police Fire Streets Total 160,123.00 56,137.00 59,912.00 276,172.00 2004/2005 (160,123.00) (56,137.00) (59,912.00) (276,172.00) - 174,941.93 68,380.22 243,322.15 2005/2006 - (174,941.93) (68,380.22) (243,322.15) 310,455.00 85,000.00 339,900.00 735,355.00 2006/2007 35,000.00 (35,000.00) - Expenses (41,058.54) Remaining 304,396.46 Revenue Expenses Remaining (50,000.00) (301,745.36) (392,803.90) 38,154.64 342,551.10 90,000.00 264,336.45 354,336.45 2007/2008 90,000.00 264,336.45 354,336.45 Remaining 304,396.46 90,000.00 302,491.09 696,887.55 Total For 06/07 Streets, $349,000 was actually "reserved" for Capital Projects, even though only $339,900 was actually received. This difference could be made up by the Interest Earnings that has accumulated over the years, totaling about $34,200. SAN JACINTO October 2, 2007 Ms. Jennifer Sargent, Community Benefit Committee County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street, 4th Floor Riverside, Ca. 92501 Honorable Members of the Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee: Thank you for your recent SB 621 Indian Gaming mitigation grant agreement (SO3-06) between the City of San Jacinto and your esteemed body, for fiscal year 2006-07. The City of San Jacinto submitted a request for a funding to complete an expansion of the San Jacinto Police Department and received a grant in the amount of $310,455. Unfortunately, initial estimates from contractors were far in excess of this amount ($1,100,000) and only minor preliminary portions of this project could be completed. Due to the cooling in the construction market and a lessoning of demand for raw materials, the City of San Jacinto hopes that releasing this project for bids a second time will result in more realistic estimates. In addition, the City of San Jacinto has identified about $200,000 worth of funding that could be used to complete this project as even conservative estimates placed the entire cost at about $500,000. The City of San Jacinto respectfully requests that the remaining funds from this project continued into FY 07/08 so that this project can continue forward. Sincerely, Bair McClellan City Manager cc: Lt. Kevin Vest, San Jacinto Police Department Steven Pasarow, Redevelopment Operations Manager City Manager's Office 201 East Main Street I San Jacinto, CA 92583 I Ph (951) 487-7342 I Fax (951) 654-3728 I www.ci.san-jacinto.ca.us AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Enclosure: Closed Session Staff Report for Redevelopment Agency Meeting of March 06, 2008 Discussion Regarding Potential Disposition of Agency Property Consent Calendar Item Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) City Departments Item Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. B. C. Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary XX Comments: THIS IS A CLOSED SESSION DISCUSSION ITEM. Conference with Real Property Negotiators California Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: Assessor Parcel Number 433-180-029; 031; 032; 034 Agency Negotiator: Barry McClellan, RDA Executive Director Negotiating Parties: Jim Handley Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting: DATE: February 26, 2007 Steven G. Pasarow, Redev. Opns. Mgr. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING of the SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO MARCH 6, 2008 Immediately Following the Regular City Council Meeting San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. If an item is pulled, it will be heard at the end of number `5. Staff Reports.' 3.1 February 21, 2008, RDA Minutes regular meeting / Approve / Agency Secretary 4. PUBLIC HEARING None scheduled 5. STAFF REPORTS At the end of the scheduled City Department items, anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Chairman; state their name, address, and the consent calendar item number pulled. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 GRC Associates Inc's proposal to update and prepare an amendment to the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Plan / Redevelopment Operations Manager 1) Accept the proposal from GRC Associates Inc for the purpose of reauthorizing the Agency's eminent domain authority within the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area; Redevelopment Agency Agenda March 6, 2008 Page 2 of 2 2) Authorize the Executive Director, subject to review and approval by the Agency's Counsel to negotiate and execute a contract agreement with GRC Associates Inc 3) Authorize the Interim Finance Director to allocate $28,400 from the Redevelopment Agency 80% Fund to pay the associated costs, fees and expenses of the consultant under the contract agreement 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 Conference with Real Property Negotiators California Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: Assessor Parcel Number 433-180-029; 031; 032; 034 Agency Negotiator: Barry McClellan, Executive Director Negotiating Parties: Jim Handley Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment 8. ADJOURNMENT It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (951) 537-6358, at least 48-hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. If you challenge any action of the Redevelopment Agency Board in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Redevelopment Agency (c/o Redevelopment Secretary) at, or prior to, the public hearing. I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, Secretaay of the San Jacinto RdeveCopmentAgency, do fiere6y cert6 that I caused to 6e posted the foregoing agenda the 296 day of rFe6ruaty, 2008, as required 6y Caw. Dorothy L. Chouinard, Agency Secretaiy MINUTES REGULAR MEETING of the SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO FEBRUARY 21, 2008, 9:00 P.M. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1 ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Chairman Jim Ayres called the regular meeting of the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency to order at 9:00 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson, John Mansperger, Dale Stubblefield Absent: Robert Ritchie 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 February 7, 2008, RDA Minutes regular meeting / Approve I Agency Secretary M/S/C (Mansperger I Carlson) moved to approve the RDA Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 3/0 with Director Stubblefield abstaining. Ayes: Carlson, Mansperger, Ayres Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: Stubblefield 4. PUBLIC HEARING None scheduled Redevelopment Agency Minutes February 21, 2008 Page 2 of 3 5. STAFF REPORTS 5.1 GRC Associates Inc's proposal to update and prepare an amendment to the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Plan / Redevelopment Operations Manager 1) Accept the proposal from GRC Associates Inc for the purpose of reauthorizing the Agency's eminent domain authority within the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, subject to review and approval by the Agency's Counsel to negotiate and execute a contract agreement with GRC Associates Inc 3) Authorize the Interim Finance Director to allocate $28,400 from the Redevelopment Agency 80% Fund to pay the associated costs, fees and expenses of the consultant under the contract agreement Redevelopment Operations Manager Pasarow reviewed the staff report, noting that 12 companies were contacted and only three returned proposals. Director Stubblefield questioned the large difference in the proposals. Vice Chairman Carlson noted the city is not obligated to go with the lowest bid in this instance and expressed concern about picking the best team. Chairman Ayres suggested bringing this item back to the agency directors at the first meeting in March. He further suggested having John Friedrich present to answer questions. Vice Mayor Carlson suggested that because #2 is being opened, now would be the time to open other items if there was something else that needed to be addressed. The council unanimously concurred to bring the Agenda Item 5.1 back March 6, 2008. 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None Chairman Ayres recessed the regular RDA meeting at 9:05 p.m. and reconvened the meeting in Closed Session at 11:31 p.m. 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 Conference with Real Property Negotiators California Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: Assessor Parcel Numbers 437-083-01; 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, Redevelopment Agency Minutes February 21, 2008 Page 3 of 3 07, 08, 09 and common lot area #1 Agency Negotiator: Barry McClellan, RDA Executive Director Negotiating Parties: Jim Handley, Graciella LLC Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment No reportable action. 7.2 Conference with Real Property Negotiators California Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: Assessor Parcel Number 439-110-093 Agency Negotiator: Barry McClellan, RDA Executive Director Negotiating Parties: Joe Meyer and/or Dennis Mackey dba San Jacinto Investors Group Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment No reportable action. 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the agency, Chairman Ayres adjourned the meeting at 11:43 p.m. San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, Agency Secretary By Jim Ayres, Chairman Approved as read Approved as amended AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for Redevelopment Agency Meeting of March 06, 2008 Discussion Regarding Approval of Proposal for Amending the SaJacinto Redevelopment Project Area Plan _ Consent Calendar Item _ Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) XX City Departments Item Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. B. C. Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting: DATE: February 26, 2007 Steven G. Pasarow, Redev. Opns. Mgr. AGENDA ITEM 5, March 03, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Board FROM: Steven G. Pasarow, Redevelopment Operations Manager Via Tim Hults, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Approve the proposal from GRC Associates, Inc., for the preparation of an amendment to the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Plan to reauthorize the Agency's eminent domain authority. RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency Board by motion: 1) Approve the proposal from the GRC Associates, Inc., to provide professional consulting services for the purpose of preparing an update of and amendment to the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the purpose of reauthorizing the Agency's eminent domain authority within the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area ("Project Area"), and; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, subject to review and approval by Agency Counsel, to negotiate and execute a contract agreement with GRC Associates, Inc., containing, among other provisions, the terms set forth in the Agency's request for proposals approved by the Agency on December 6, 2007 ("REP"), and; 3) Authorize the Finance Director to allocate $28,400.00 from the Redevelopment Agency 80% Fund to pay the associated costs, fees and expenses of the consultant under the contract agreement. Page 1 of 4 DISCUSSION: On February 21, 2008, the Agency reviewed a staff report regarding approval of a proposal to update the Redevelopment Plan and for assistance in the Plan amendment process to reauthorize eminent domain authority for the Project Area. Proposals were received from the following three firms: GRC Associates, Incorporated... $ 28,400.00 Estimated time to complete the amendment process +/- 6 Months Rosenow Spevacek Group, Incorporated $ 83,390.00 Estimated time to complete the amendment process +/- 7 Months Urban Futures, Incorporated $128,500.00 Estimated time to complete the amendment process +/- 12 Months The Agency's looked at the 12 tasks requested in the RFP and indicated that for clarification the Agency would consider factors besides the lowest cost in its effort to retain the most qualified consultant. The Agency requested that staff ask each of the finalist Consultants to questions: 1) What specifically would the Consultant do to respond to task number 2? "Perform a detailed review of the existing Plan to identify additional recommendations for changes, if any, to the Plan for inclusion into the anticipated Plan Amendment" is found in the attachments to this report; and, 2) Why there is there such a wide spread between the lowest and highest bids. The response to question one is found in the attachments to this report along with each consultants scope of services. The response to question two is as follows: The low bidder, GRC Associates, is devoting two persons to this project, the President and Owner of the company and one Principal. The middle bidder, Rosenow Spevacek Group is devoting six persons to the project, a Principal; a Project Manager; a Senior Associate; an Associate; a Senior Analyst; and an Analyst. The high bidder, Urban Futures, is devoting seven persons from their firm, an Executive Vice -President; two Vice Presidents; a Principal Planner; and three Planners along with an associated company Alfred Gobar Associates; who will devote an additional four persons to the project; a Principal; a Senior Research Associate; a Research Associate and an Administrative Assistant. Page 2 of 4 Thus, the low bidder will devote two persons to the project, the middle bidder will devote six persons to the project and the high bidder will devote eleven persons to the project. Obviously, the more persons devoted to the project, the higher the staffing costs. Staff previously recommended that the Agency award the project to the GRC Associates, Inc., and still makes that same recommendation as their cost to prepare this update and amendment to the Project Area Plan is less than '/2 the cost of the next lowest proposal. In addition, current GRC staff is different than when they prepared the original project area plan in 1990. Staff has checked references and believes that GRC staff is fully capable of doing the necessary research and data assemblage to prepare the reports, studies and findings that must be prepared or made under the CRL in connection with the proposed Plan amendment process. As stated during the February discussion on this item, because this is not a Public Works Project, the Agency is not restricted to awarding the project to the low bidder. Therefore should the Agency, for any reason, feel that another Consultant would better fulfill the needs of this project, they may do so under the law. Staff has confidence in all three of the finalists and has received positive references on all. Staff believes that all finalists are capable of completing the required tasks listed in the RFP. The Agency Board should be aware of the possibility that, in light of the recently enacted changes to the CRL and the proposition(s) currently scheduled for the June and/or November 2008 ballot(s), the Agency may not be able to make the findings required to reauthorize its eminent domain authority. However, this is an issue that will need to be evaluated and addressed by a qualified consultant and discussed by the Agency at the appropriate time. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve the proposal from GRC Associates, Inc., to (i) assist the Agency in the process of amending and updating the Redevelopment Project Area Plan for the purpose of reauthorizing the Agency's eminent domain authority within the Project Area, and (ii) authorize the Executive Director, subject to the review and approval of the Agency Counsel, to negotiate and execute a contract agreement with GRC Associates, Inc., and; (iii) authorize the Finance Director to allocate $28,400.00 from the Redevelopment Agency 80% Fund to pay the associated costs, fees and expenses of the consultant under the contract agreement, or; Page 3 of 4 2) Select another consultant based upon the Agency's criteria, or; 3) Take no action. FISCAL IMPACT: The amendment to the Project Area to reauthorize eminent domain authority was not included in the FY 07/08 budget. Therefore, funds in the amount of $28,400.00 will have to be allocated from the Redevelopment Agency 80% Fund, to cover this proposed expenditure. ATTACHMENTS: • Letters and scope of services from GRC Associates, Inc., the Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc., and Urban Futures, Inc. Due to size, the Consultant's proposals are available for review in the office of the Redevelopment Operations Manager. Page 4 of 4 Feb 25 08 02:38p GRC RSSOCIRTES INC 7149852880 p.2 cQc ASSOCIATES, INC. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REDEVELOPMENT REAL ESTATE CONSULTING AFFORDABLE HOUSING URBAN PLANNING 858 OAK PARK ROAD SUITE 280 COVINA, CA 91724 T: (626) 331 - 6373 F: (626) 331 •6375 February 25, 2008 Mr. Steven G. Pasarow Redevelopment Operations Manager Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto 248 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: Details of Task 2 of the Proposed Amendment to the San Jacinto Redevelopment Plan Dear Mr. Pasarow: GRC Associates, Inc. ("GRC") is pleased to submit additional Information regarding our proposal on the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto's ("Agency") Plan Amendment. As requested by the Agency, the following information provides more detail on Task 2: Perform a detailed re view of the existing Plan to identify additional recommendations for changes, if any, to the Plan for inclusion into the anticipated Plan Amendment. As stated in the RFP, the purpose of the amendment is to reauthorize the Agency's eminent domain authority and to address recent changes tc the Redevelopment Law. However, since the existing San Jacinto Redevelops vent Plan is approximately 25 years old, there may be other issues that need consideration, such as time limits or tax increment caps. Major ?Ian amendments entail steps that are similar to those required for the adoption of a new redevelopment plan, and therefore, are relatively costly and requi 'e a lengthy process. It may be beneficial for the Agency to update/amend the Redevelopment Plan in one process. GRC proposes to examine the existing Redevelopment Plan for the following issues: • Increase Tax Increment Limits: Based on the Agency's Financial Statement, determine the amount of tax increment allocated to the Agency and how close it is to the limit. Additional redevelopment projects needed to eliminate blight in the Project Area may require an amendment to increase the tax increment limit. A Negative Declare [ion is appropriate for CEQA documentation. • Add or Remove Territory: Adding territory is very similar to adopting a new project area The procedure will include preparation cf a Preliminary Plan, legal description and map, blight analysis and Preliminary Report, possible formation of a Project Area Committee (PAC), Report to Council, ordinance, and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). To remove territory, the process is the same as adcing area, with the exception that a Negative Declaration may be adegt ate instead of an ER, provided that no major environmental changes hive occurred since the certification of the existing Redevelopment Plan =lR or General Plan EIR. This will be addressed in the environmental In tial Study for the amendment. Feb 25 08 02:39p GRC RSSOCIRTES INC 7149852880 p•3 Details of Task 2 of the Proposal February 25, 2008 Page 2 • New Public Improvement Projects: If additional public improvement projects are necessary to eliminate remaining blight in the Project Area and these project: were not identified in the existing Redevelopment Plan, an amendment would be recuired. Projects may include, for example, infrastructure improvements (street, sewer, .eater, drainage, etc.), public community center, municipal maintenance yards, etc. This amendment would require all the redevelopment documents (Preliminary Report, Report to Council and all notices). It is most likely that a Supplemental EIR would be adequate for the CEQA process. ■ Merge Project Area: To allow the Agency greater financial flexibility in using the tax increment revenues, the Agency may consider merging the San Jacinto Projec' Area with the Saboba Redevelopment Project Area. This amendment would allow the pooling of tax increment revenues from both Project Areas and focusing the funds on either Project Area. As part of the process, the State Housing and Community Development (HCD) must be notified at least 30 days prior to adoption cf the ordinance for the merger. A Negative Declaration would be appropriate for a merger amendment. • Increase Time Limits: Examine the time limits for pre-1994 Plans. Limit . Timeframe Establishment of loans, advances and indebtedness The later of 20 years after plan adoption or January 1, 2004. Effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan The later of 40 years after plan adoption or January 1, 2009. Time limit for repayment of indebtedness. Not later than 10 years after the termination of the redevelopment plan activities. SB 211 allows existing redevelopment plans can be amended with the adoption if an ordinance by the City Council without any of the noticing, hearing, or documentation requirements normally applicable to a redevelopment amendment. It does, how3ver, trigger obligations to make statutory pass -through payments. This assumes tha SB 211 ordinance has not been adopted by the San Jacinto City Council. There are at this time unknown procedures and documentation that may increase the overall cost and time schedule. For example the formation of a PAC requires a process that involves: 1) City Council adopting a PAC formation procedures; 2) notices; 3) City Council hearing on the PAC election process; 4) election of members; 5) certification of election results; and 6) PAC meetings. In addition, the CEQA process must be initiated fcr all redevelopment plans. Depending on the amendment, an EIR may be required. This process includes, an Initial Study, Draft EIR with its 45-day review period, Final EIR, aid a Mitigation Monitoring Program. The EIR process takes time, may require technical studies and is closely reviewed by the public, especially if there is possible legal challenge tc the amendment. GRC has the capability and experience to assist the Agency on any of the above -mentioned amendments.. If you require any additional information, please feel free to contact me. We look forward to assisting the Agency on this project. Sincerely, 27. a, -� John N. Oshimo President GRC ASSOCIATES, INC. Task 4: Redevelopment Plan Adoption The shorter version of the Report to Council is the final document to be prepared in the redevelopment planning process. This document forms the major element of the public record regarding the plan adoption process. GRC will produce in cooperation with the legal counsel, the joint public hearing notices. The joint public notice will be published once a week for three successive weeks and will be mailed to each resident, business, and property owner in the project area. GRC will prepare the final transmittals to the various taxing agencies. Task 5: Public Participation Program Although the public participation process is not statutorily required, except under certain circumstances, the controversial nature of redevelopment -- especially eminent domain -- and the community concerns frequently encountered in the redevelopment plan amendment process make it a good practice for cities to inform their residents and businesses on potential plans for redevelopment plan amendments. In order to inform the public prior to the public hearing, we recommend that two informal meetings or "open houses" be held which should be conducted by the Agency staff and assisted by CRC. The intent of these meetings is to educate the property owners on redevelopment and the proposed amendments to dispel any fears about redevelopment. GRC also recommends that information handout documents and meetings be in both English and Spanish. GRC staff has the translation and interpretation capabilities. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO PAGE 15 GRC ASSOCIATES, INC. In addition to the field surveys, extensive use of documents and interview data from City sources would be added to the findings and conclusions regarding the existence of blighting conditions in the study area. GRC will collect the following information: • Active building code violations from the City's Code Enforcement Department. • List of federal and state agencies identifying hazardous material sites, such as the State Water Resources Control Board's Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database of potential contaminated sites. Part I Crime statistics by reporting districts/neighborhoods. Socio-economic data from the U.S. Census and the Southern California Association of Governments. • County Assessor property tax information and sales tax information. • Market data secured from rental surveys and resale values. Task 2: Redevelopment Plan Preparation The Redevelopment Plan Amendment is primarily a legal document, which contains the Agency's powers and authorities in carrying out the amended plan. The draft Amended Redevelopment Plan is transmitted to the Planning Commission for its report and recommendation. GRC will prepare the draft amended redevelopment plan, staff reports and resolutions. GRC will update the Agency's Owner Participation Rules and Relocation Guidelines to conform to existing State law. GRC will prepare all required documents. Task 3: Environmental Documentation The adoption of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment is subject to the provisions of the CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. GRC will prepare an Initial Study that will assess the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. The environmental process will parallel the preparation of the redevelopment plan andaccompany the plan through adoption. GRC anticipates a Negative Declaration for this proposed amendment. GRC will prepare and submit all required notices (Notice of Intent to Prepare a Negative Declaration, Notice of Completion, Notice of Availability, Notice of Preparation), and receive confirmation from the Department of Fish and Game on the "no effect" on fish and wildlife. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO PAGE 14 GRC ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Scope of Work GRC will develop a work plan during the first week that details the project's schedule. The calendar of events will identify and schedule the tasks to be performed and products to be prepared and submitted to the City Council, Agency, and Planning Commission. The milestones identified in this work plan will correspond to the strict schedule required under both the Redevelopment Law and the CEQA. As part of project management role, the GRC team will prepare all staff reports and resolutions for City staff and attorney review and approval. Task 1: Documentation of Blight GRC understands that prior to amending the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Plan it is first necessary to determine whether conditions of blight still remain under the current California Community Redevelopment Law ("Redevelopment Law"). As of January 1, 2007, new legislation (SB 1206) significantly redefined both the physical and economic standards for what qualifies as blight. It narrowed the definition of blight and made it more difficult to qualify a property as blighted. In general, physical blight must be evidenced by long-term neglect and show a serious health and safety risk to residents and businesses. To meet the new Redevelopment Law requirements, GRC will initiate a systematic parcel -by -parcel survey of the existing project areas. The survey data for each parcel will be recorded on forms developed by GRC. The survey forms record existing exterior physical conditions for each parcel, with detail information and photos of those parcels considered as exhibiting one or more blighting conditions as defined in Redevelopment Law. The survey results will be illustrated on GIS maps (ArcView) developed by GRC. The following photos are examples of physical blight witnessed in the Project Area. This is only preliminary and a more detailed survey and documentation will be conducted as part of this task. As stated in Redevelopment Law, one of the key criteria of physical blight is when "buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work. These conditions may be caused by serious building code violations, serious dilapidation and deterioration caused by long-term neglect, construction that is vulnerable to serious damage from seismic or geologic hazards, and faulty or inadequate water or sewer utilities".. Buildings in San Jacinto are vulnerable to serious damage from seismic activity because of the City is situated between two parallel Alquist-Priolo earthquake fault zones. In addition, GRC will examine the adequacy of the City's sewer and water system based on sewer and water master plans and discussions with the City's Public Works Department. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO PAGE 9 INTELLIGENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 22, 2008 Mr. Steven Pasarow Redevelopment Operations Manager CITY OF SAN JACINTO 210 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. T 714 541 4525 309 WEST 4TH STREET F 714 541 1175 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA E INFO :a-WEBRSG.COM 92701-4502 WERRSG.COM Via E-Mail DETAILED REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATE Dear Mr. Pasarow: This is to clarify RSG's proposal to conduct a detailed review of the existing redevelopment plan pursuant to Item 2 of the Scope of Services in the City's Request for Proposals dated December 17, 2007. As addressed under Task 2 of our proposal Scope of Work, we will conduct a comprehensive review of the San Jacinto Redevelopment Plan, adopted in June 1983, in the context of ensuring that the Plan adequately and appropriately reflects any legislative or regulatory changes occurring since adoption of the Plan. Our review will focus on salient changes to the California Redevelopment Law and evaluating the impacts of such changes on the existing Plan. Review and evaluation of the Plan will be conducted by Ms. Acosta and I to ensure the highest professional level of review and most cost-effective approach is undertaken by the firm. All issues and concerns arising from our review will be discussed with City staff to identify the best approach for addressing the issues in the Plan, if deemed appropriate, while preserving to the Agency the greatest level of flexibility in pursuing its implementation activities under the Plan. Recommended changes, if any, will be incorporated into the process for amending the Plan pursuant to re-establishing eminent domain authority in the Project Area. aEUEVELOPMENT PLANNING REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS HOUSING FINANCING REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT SERVICES Mr. Steven Pasarow CITY OF SAN JACINTO February 22, 2008 Page 2 The fee proposal for conducting the detailed review is identified under Task I in our Budget Detail for an amount of $3,510 (18 hours). Sincerely, ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. Housing Manager/Director Cc: / Enclosure PHASE 1 - EMINENT DOMAIN EXTENSION FEASIBILITY REVIEW Phase 1 will ascertain whether the Project Area contains conditions that meet the new definition of blight, and whether or not there are pervasive conditions of blight to support extending the eminent domain authority. The tasks RSG would undertake to complete Phase 1 include: Tasks 1.1 - Scoping Meeting RSG will meet with appropriate staff to refine the work effort, discuss critical issues, and identify Agency staff that may be of assistance in assembling information for the Feasibility Review. 1.2 - Baseline Data Collection Either during the initial staff meeting or immediately thereafter, RSG will contact appropriate personnel to obtain readily available data on infrastructure deficiencies, improvement plans, the City of San Jacinto General Plan and other development standard documents, building code enforcement violations, crime statistics, real estate vacancies, and land use impediments to identify the social, physical, or economic problems in the Project Area. 1.3 - Blight Survey RSG will conduct a brief windshield blight survey of the Project Areas. This survey will generally review viewable infrastructure, physical, and economic conditions in the Project Area as they relate to the findings required by the Law. 1.4 - Feasibility Review Conclusion RSG will review blight findings and provide a recommendation to the Agency on the feasibility of extending the eminent domain authority in the Project Areas. PHASE 2 A - Evaluate Redevelopment Plan Document for Changes required by legislative changes to the Law. Changes to the Law hare required certain actions by the Agency to keep the Redevelopment Plan in compliance with the Law. Senior RSG staff will review requirements placed upon redevelopment agencies such as Senate Bill (SB) 53, SB1206 and SB 1890 and review existing plan document to determine what changes are required. RSG has identified below the current Plan Limitations. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO San Jacinto Redevelopment Plan Limits Eminent Incur New Plan Collect Tax Total Tax Total Outstanding Plan Limits Domain Debt Duration Increment Increment Debt Eliminated per Ord. No. 05- Original Area Expired 07 /1 6/28/2023 6/28/2033 $2,699,000,000 $480,000,600 6/28/2024/2 6/28/2034/2 6/28/2025/3 6/28/2035/3 (Ord. No. 754) (Ord. No. 754) Amendment Area Expired 12/28/2013 (Ord. No. 992) 12/28/2033 12/28/2043 Total amount shown above applies to Original and Am endm entAreas 1/ On April7, 2005, CdyCouncil and Agency adopted Amen dmentNO. 4 (Ordinance No. D5-07), 2002) eliminated the time lim it to incur debt. 2/ City Council and Redevelopment Agency approved Ordinance No. 5-1 D on April 21, 2005. Pursuant to SB 1045, (Statutes of 2003) the City Councl may extend by one year the term of the Redevelopment and period to collect tax ncrem entin return for making 2003- 2004 ERAF payments. 3/ City Council and Redevelopment Agency approved Ordinance No. 5-11 on April 21, 2005. Pursuant to Se 1096, (Statutes of 2004) the City Councl may extend by one year the term of the Redevelopment and period to collect tax increm entin return for making 2004- 2005 ERAF payments. PHASE 3 - AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS If Phase 1 indicates that there is substantial evidence of blight to extend eminent domain authority in the Project Area, RSG proposes to perform the following tasks related to a simplified eminent domain plan amendment procedure. Tasks 3.1 - Prepare Amendment Schedule Ascertain the City Council meeting and agenda deadline schedules and coordinate with staff in the development of the project schedule. The schedule will articulate the task, time frame, and person responsible for each task. 3.2 - Blight Survey, Data Collection & Research The field survey will be conducted on a detailed parcel -by -parcel basis in the portions of the Project Area identified as blighted during Phase 1. RSG will take photos of blighting conditions to include in Phase 2 reports if necessary. Data on infrastructure deficiencies, improvement plans, the City of San Jacinto General Plan and other development standard documents, building code enforcement violations, crime statistics, real estate vacancies, and land use impediments to identify the social, physical, or economic problems in the Project Area. This information will be compared to like data for similar communities and/or the County to determine whether or not the Project Area is more impacted by physical and economic blighting conditions. 3.3 - Prepare Necessary Documents Prepare required staff reports and resolutions, the text amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, the Report to Council pursuant to Section 33352 of the Law, and the Report on Blight pursuant to Section 33451.5 of the Law. Drafts will be forwarded to staff and special counsel for review and approval prior to distribution. These documents will include, but not be limited to: • Report on Blight • Responses to Comments -those ■ Report to Council received at the public hearing in Redevelopment Plan Text objection to the amendment (RSG • p fee includes responses to 5 ■ Notices and mailing lists objections. Additional responses • Staff reports will be billed on a time and • Resolutions materials basis). 3.4 - Community Meeting(s) The Agency has determined not to include eminent domain on residential properties; therefore we do not believe that the process will require the formation of a formal Project Area Committee ("PAC"). It is suggested that the Agency consult with and obtain the advice of any existing redevelopment advisory groups and it is recommended that a community information meeting be held prior to the public hearing. 3.5 - Prepare Mailing List With the assistance of Agency staff, RSG will prepare comprehensive mailing lists of Project Area taxing agencies, property owners, businesses, and residential occupants. Property ownership information will be based upon the assessor's equalized roll. 3.6 - Prepare and Transmit Taxing Agency Notices RSG will work with Agency Legal Counsel to prepare all taxing agency and public notices, and ensure that they are ready for transmittal in the time frames required by the Law. The consultant will assume the responsibility of transmitting all documents and notices (excluding the environmental notices) to the taxing agencies as part of the not -to -exceed fee. The consultant will prepare the community meeting and Public Hearing Notice for review and approval by staff and Agency Legal Counsel. RSG can oversee the actual printing, assembly, and mailing of such notices as an optional service, charged on a time and materials basis. 3.7 - Meeting Attendance The Principal -in -Charge and/or the Project Manager will be available to attend project management team/staff meetings, Planning Commission, PAC, Community Information, and Agency Board meetings as determined by staff, and the final public hearing. Specifically, the following meetings, at minimum, shall be attended: ■ 2 Team Meetings Staff and Agency Legal Counsel ■ 2 Public Hearing and City Council Meetings ([1] joint public hearing and [1] adoption meeting if City receives written objections) ■ 1 Public Information Community Meeting • 1 Redevelopment Advisory Committee Meeting PHASE 4 - Environmental Documentation Initial Study/Negative Declaration: RSG would undertake to complete an Initial Study and appropriate documentation in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed amendment. RSG will provide a careful, objective and detailed evaluation of the 20 amendment, with the understanding that in any event, the amendment will further the objectives of the City's General Plan as well as the Redevelopment Plan. RSG will analyze the amendment in light of the requirements of CEQA, the State Guidelines, as well as local procedures adopted by the City of San Jacinto ("City"). This work will be undertaken in close coordination with designated City staff members. The initial assumption is that a Negative Declaration (ND) will be involved. While that determination cannot be made until completion of an Initial Study (IS), this proposed scope of work relates to preparation of a Negative Declaration. The City will be responsible for providing the following information, documentation or other support to RSG to ensure successful completion of the work. • Copies of all City environmental forms as well as adopted Local CEQA Procedures • Copies of relevant planning documents (City General Plan and Final EIR, Master Environmental Assessment if available, specific plans, zoning code, etc.) ■ Copies of recent CEQA clearances (public and private projects in area, etc.) considered by the City RSG will prepare and submit each deliverable as an electronic file, in Word format. Tasks: 4.1 - Data Collection/Document Review RSG will visit the project area to become familiar with its salient characteristics; interview key City staff and other stakeholders, as appropriate; gather relevant City planning and environmental documents, maps and aerial photos related to the project; and review them for assistance in preparing the IS/ND. 4.2 - Preparation of IS and Draft ND Utilizing City of San Jacinto format, RSG will prepare an Initial Study and the appropriate environmental document (assumed for the present to be a Draft ND) for review by City staff. These documents will be presented in electronic form. 4.3 - Preparation of Revised ND RSG will coordinate with appropriate City staff to make necessary revisions leading to a Revised ND and submit it in electronic form. Our assumption is that City planning staff can post and distribute the document, consistent with standard City procedures, in a more efficient manner than can RSG. However, should the City desire that we provide this extra service, we will be happy to do so. 4.4 - Preparation of Final ND RSG will, in close cooperation with City staff, particularly those responsible for CEQA compliance, evaluate all comments received during the ND posting period, prepare appropriate responses and make necessary modifications to the Revised ND. RSG will ensure that relevant CEQA findings and resolution language are prepared. 4.5 - Public Hearing RSG staff that prepared the CEQA clearance will participate in Council or Planning Commission sessions, if/as directed by City staff. 4.6 - Conference Calls/Meetings with Staff Close coordination with City is critical for the successful completion of the environmental documentation for the Amendment. As such, it will be cost effective to rely on conference calls and email exchanges to the maximum extent possible. The fee quote includes two on -site meetings with staff and attendance at one public hearing on the CEQA clearance. Fax sent by : 17142839319 URBAN FUTURES INC. 02-2Z-08 18:55 Pg: 2/3 URBAN FUTURES INCORPORATED TO: FROM: Finance • Redevelopment • Implementation Planning • Bond Administration MEMORANDUM Steven G. Pasarow, Redevelopment Operations Manager City of San Jacinto Jon Huffman, Executive Vice President Urban Futures, Inc. DATE: February 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Amendment to Proposal dated January 2008 to Amend the Redevelopment Plan for the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area You have asked Urban Futures, Inc. (UFI) to amend its proposal for the subject to explain how we will "specifically deal with fulfilling the requirements of item number 2 in the RFP's list of 12 tasks." Our proposal responded to item number 2 in Task 1 which is hereby amended as shown below. All other terms and conditions of UFI's proposal remain as originally submitted. The underline words represent additions to the Task 1 description. Task 1: Data and Document Request; Conduct Comprehensive Review of Same; Staff Meeting $ 4,900 UFI will work with staff to identify, collect, and then review all pertinent Plan, Project Area, and Amendment related documents and data base for the purpose of helping to determine the adequacy of the Plan and Project Area vis-a-vis current legal requirements. This will help to identify issues that may need resolution prior to or simultaneously with preparation of the Amendment. UFI will then meet with Agency staff to discuss findings and to make initial recommendations with regard to completing the Amendment and related work tasks. At a minimum; UFI will specifically review the Plan to determine its consistency with andpotential for extending various financial and/or time limits of the Plan under; i) CORL Section 33333.6(d)f iil_ CCRL Section 33333.8(e)((2)(B). to eliminate the time limit on establishing loans and indebtedness: iiil CORL Section 33:433.6(e)(2)(C1, the right to extend the term of the Plan and the time limit to repay indebtedness by one year relating to the Educatienal revenue augmentation fund (ERAF) payments in FY 2003-04: iv) CCRL Section 33333.6(e)(2)(D1, the right to extend the terra of the Plan Aloe time limit to reoav indebtedness by up to two years relating. to ERAF payments In FY 2004-05 and 2005-06; v) CCRL Section 33338.10(a) to extend: the term of the_Plan and the time during which the Agency may collect tax increments This is a part of the "AB 12 9" szretkieriS acted in 1993, and opportunities may have already been evaluated. Crestview Corporate Center . 3111 N, Tustin Avenue, Suite 230, Orange, CA 92885.1753 Telephone: {714) 233-9334 General e•mall: planningeurtanfutureeinc,com Fax (714) 283-9319 Fax sent by : 17142839319 URBAN FUTURES INC. 02-22-08 18:55 Pg: 3/3 by ten years; vi) the need fox a new and expanded projects and programs list; OR CCRL Section 3.3342.7.to describe the Agency's program to acquire real property by eminent domain and adopt an ordinance relating to the same (already a part of this scope of work); and vili) review the Plan for the potential to increase the amount of tax increment which may be divided and allocated to the Agency, and the amount of bonded indebtedness which may be outstanding at any one time. Additionally. UPI will discuss with staff the potential to add territory to the existino Project Area: any fieki work required to Quantify the extent of any additional territory to be added to he Project Area may be billed on a time and materials is, 2 Proposal for Redevelopment Plan Amendment Services Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto SCOPE OF WORK AND PROJECT BUDGET PROJECT BACKGROUND The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto (the "Agency") was activated in 1983; the Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan") for the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") was adopted on June 28, 1983, by Ordinance No. 754. According to the December 17, 2007 RFP, the Plan's previous eminent domain authority expired late in 2005. The Project Area currently includes about 2,000 acres and is shown on the Map and aerial images included herewith as Attachment C. We note here that there is a substantial amount of undeveloped property presently designated for residential, agricultural, commercial and industrial uses in the Project Area. Urban Futures, Inc. (UFI) has prepared this Proposal which outlines the process for conducting a comprehensive review of the Plan and Project Area for consistency with current State law, and then assisting the Agency to adopt an amendment (the "Amendment") to the Plan for the purpose of reauthorizing the use of eminent domain in the Project Area for an additional 12 year period.' The Amendment to reauthorize eminent domain will have two important distinctions that will influence the timing and complexity of the redevelopment plan amendment process. First, it is our understanding that the Amendment will not authorize the Agency to acquire property on which "any persons" reside. Second, because of the first provision, a Project Area Committee (PAC) will not be required to be formed and operated as an aspect of the proposed redevelopment amendment process. GENERAL APPROACH TO BLIGHT DISCOVERY, RECORDATION AND ANALYSES This proposal incorporates all new requirements established under SBs 53, 1206, 1210 and other newly adopted bills affecting redevelopment plan amendments recently codified within the CCRL statutes and that became state law effective January 1, 2007. With regard to the Amendment, newly codified CCRL Section 33333.4(g)(2) now requires that the Agency find, based upon substantial evidence, that "significant blight remains within the Project Area," and "that this blight cannot be eliminated without the use of eminent domain." The following section outlines our general approach to blight discovery and analyses techniques. IN -FIELD In order to successfully document the prevalence and significance of physical and economic blighting conditions within the Project Area, UFI has identified 40 physical conditions (the "Blight Indicators"; see Attachment D) determined to be adverse to the public health, safety, and welfare derived from a review of the following sources, and which we propose to be evaluated at a parcel specific level:2 i) CCRL Section 33031(a) (physical blight indicators), Section 33031(b) (economic The effective life of the Plan is 40 years (until 2023). 2 Parcel specific analysis summarized in Attachment D will apply only to those parcels determined to require such focus. This determination will be made following review of ariel images and discussions with Agency/City staff. Generally speaking, recent development and vacant land will not require parcel specific analysis. Our preliminary review of the January 2008 Z:\00Proposals\San Jacinto'RmandSrvcs.wpd 6 rpl 7/28/08 I I I I Proposal for Redevelopment Plan Amendment Services Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto blight indicators),and Section 33030 (c) (inadequate public improvements), ii) Uniform Housing Code, iii) Uniform Building Code, iv) California Penal Code, v) California Building Code, vi) California Electric and Fire Codes, and vii) California Vehicle Code. A catalog of this preliminary list of Blight Indicators is included herewith as Attachment D, which is intended to provide a standard set of deleterious conditions that may be tailored to San Jacinto. The parcel specific blight analysis will be crafted around an in -field reconnaissance effort, which will include the recordation of physical (including CCRL Section 33030(c) indicators)4 and economics Blight Indicators found to exist on each parcel, using mapping and digital photography techniques. THIRD PARTY DATABASE REVIEW The presence and degree of physical blight indicators (including CCRL Section 33030(c) indicators) that cannot be determined as an aspect of the field audit will be evaluated by UFI using methods and sources including review and analysis of third party databases (City building department for building code violations, City public works for inadequate sewer or water utilities, and County assessor records to determine ownership patterns as examples). Similarly, area wide economic Blight Indicators, including depreciated or stagnant property values or impaired investments, cannot be appropriately evaluated as part of the in -field audit and, therefore, will be evaluated by AGA through the use of electronic appraisal and U.S. Census block -group data, FBI crime statistics, and other sources and techniques described in subsequent sections of this Proposal. CEQA COMPLIANCE In regard to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq.) related work tasks, this Proposal provides that UFI will execute processes and work products required by affecting statutes as part of the Amendment process. Work products will include an initial environmental study, negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration.' UFI will also prepare all required notices and transmittals in fulfillment of CEQA requirements. subject geography (see Attachment C) is that about 2,010 parcels will require parcel specific analysis; the remaining 970 parcels in the Project Area appear to be vacant and/or newly developed. 3 These conditions are in addition to CCRL Section 33031(a) and (b), and therefore, cannot be used as a primary basis for redevelopment project area delineation and adoption. 4 To the extent that physical blight indicators can be identified "on the ground." Generally, field reconnaissance will reveal numerous ht conditions under CCRL Section 31(a), including: it is ch unsafe or unhealthy personsfor llnto live or work..., buildingscodified 0 that demonstrate substandard, defective, buildings or obsoleteldesign or construction...; adjacent or nearby incompatible land uses...; and the existencesScetiofn 33030(c),ivided includit are ng then multpce le ownership and whose physical development has been impaired...; and existen of inadequate public improvements. 5 To the extent that economic blight indicators can be identified "on the ground." Generally, field reconnaissance will reveal numerous economic blight conditions codified under CCRL Section 33031(b), including: properties containing hazardous waste, abnormally high business vacancies and rate of abandoned buildings, residential overcrowding, excess number of adult businesses, and other conditions that may constitute a serious threat to the public safety and welfare. Legal counsel will be asked to provide an opinion regarding the appropriate CEQA response. However it has been our experience in similar cases that a Negative Declaration, or in a worst case, a mitigated negative declaration, would be adequate. As such this Proposal assumes a negative declaration CEQA response, unless an expressed legal opinion or Amendment specifics dictate otherwise. January 2008 ZMOProposals\San Jacinto\AmendS rvcs.wpd 7 rpL 1/2B/OB Proposal for Redevelopment Plan Amendment Services Redevelopment Agency of the City of' San Jacinto INFORMATION DISSEMINATION AND PUBLIC RELATIONS As discussed below, UFI will assume responsibility for disseminating information to individuals, public groups, or the community at large regarding the Amendment and related activities. We propose the following community information and public relations opportunities: • two (2) public workshops; • preparation of an information fact sheet to be mailed to all residents, businesses and occupants within the Project Area as a part of the joint public hearing transmittal; and • presentations at meetings of the Agency Board, the City Council and the Planning Commission. These meeting opportunities can serve the dual purpose of educating the public about the general benefits of ongoing redevelopment in the community, and to answer questions about the objective of the proposed Amendment. UFI/AGA propose to complete the following Scope of Work in a professional and timely fashion: Z:\OOProposals\San JacintoWnen dSrvcs.wpd 8 rpl_l/28/08