Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 9/3/2009REQUEST TO SPEAK r.. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#0 SUBJECT: DATE: V IN FAVOR: ❑ cam_ Name: NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: 0 Representing:. Address: City: Telephone No: (0 S eJ q '7 Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete th's card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: 2 SUBJECT: Pu'iL./d 1AVE-A/7 DATE: %-- 3~~L°,p IN FAVOR: CI NEUTRAL: Name: ,lAA l< SCH/VJ -L- IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Representing:1 & VO, 17 / 43 /i fe tam e- k es id en i /(7,c'. 'e a/a. jj Address: /71.6? .Sa 4p -._ City: e �t%�?� Telephone No: Zk '`t%.h`1, Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST^�TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#'l.�' SUBJECT: DATE: 9 IN FAVOR:---'"C Name: Representing: Address: City: NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ try Telephone No: s Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations, with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK- • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#:& 0 SUBJECT: L..0r'k, Td I rtkst r e-iv Giver f f U426 s d DATE: I )3%C?w IN FAVOR: ❑ NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ - Name: :"re Ce ) Sf Representing: Address: r+ 3 Y y 2 `>Si`r7 A. City: V\ Jett ( Telephone No: f 5/ Wi _6 3 '' Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#f --C SUBJECT: DATE: IN FAVOR: ❑ Name: NEUTRAL: ❑ a , IN OPPOSITION: 0 Representing: Address: 1,., (3 �\-,),Jt` City:,�� �.t l r0 Telephone No: Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: 6 • SUBJECT: 6711- A IU sPJ Cr.,f 1Ce..%LvR-34/ DATE: 7/3/o S IN FAVOR: 0 Name: P7 f L f-i NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: Representing: L)Ew )211 Address: / r2? / Crn- '�? ' City: Tm A Telephone No: c? / Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#. 3 SUBJECT: j DATE: 3-o7 IN FAVOR: (❑ Name: Representing: 3 in 2_ Address: ( 5 City: NEUT IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Telephone No: ! 7U - 3 L&) / Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 16 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: SUBJECT: DATE: 1 1 ) ? IN FAVOR: ❑ Name: Representing: Address: City: NEUTRAL: CI IN OPPOSITION: Telephone No:'t- f T J I Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: 3 SUBJECT: i7i DATE: IN FAA OR: 0 NEUTRAL: 0 Name: // e Zferi�' IN OPPOSITION: Representing: C.- ©e-r 1/ K,ofid.e s5-49z, Address:7�- City: / Telephone No.: cJ S`/ 6 > ' - / P/ 2 Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council, When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM*DATE: 9 /C31o9 IN F VOR: Name: `� 1-1 ► i Representing: Address: (Z S I kr Syo - `"-_ 7 --- City: AAS J A C f &-( YC. Telephone No: 5 CI 7- e0 Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise, Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. SUBJECT: Co /►(AAs( } f t NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: C-L(`)s./ AJ4, HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: DATE: IN FAVOR: LI Name: SUBJECT: NEUTRAL: El IN OPPOSITION: Representing: Address: City: - Telephone No: S f _�! ^� Individual speaker wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: 5- ! SUBJECT: 551;0 i 4"s- To Tr2057 DATE: / l� 9 � � � IN FAV R: ❑ NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: -Et-- Name: vy dz%lly- Representing: SO,(�, 'r Ue O(! l..'0 +Yh 147,14t"ss (5o , Address: '7-Z CD JGt.ks_ Wozr ,J->:t.,%6.i City: - -eC,r'1 > 01- Telephone No: (le 1Y ?'O S' Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING, REQUEST TO SPEA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: IN FAVOR: ❑ Name: Representing: SUBJECT:' NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: Address: '2, / City: W Telephone No: 67t.12y/ Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #; SUBJECT: ' e DATE: 13i0c IN FAVOR: ❑ Name: Et( G rick NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: C l� Representing: --- 0 C Address: L4 2U i(i f fa IL i (Jf City: (? r( Telephone No.: qtS/ /— // y7 Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council, When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: 3 SUBJECT: LO DATE: °?Pos;�6 =Tr r�IN FAVOR: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Name: k14"l\) ��L�l`((� b.Ei lF Representing: = 6 F Address:cr t � %,5 ` �/c'E�2SOC= City: C�/UIC C: LS/VVffi E Telephone No: Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stayon the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK' CITY COUNCIL AGENDAITEM #:SUBJECT: Pe: r64-( DATE: CI °-- - U c IN FAVOR: U Name: Representing: Address: City: - :.Sc) NEUTRAL: U k'ir IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Telephone No( Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. Name: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM DATE: (flq• 05 c-1 REQUEST TO SPEAK SUBJECT: IN FAVOR: ❑ NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: 06_6t4P) C.o n LNr t Representing: Address: c4 (1)6 • � !4 City: AC �` r` i Telephone No: 9 , Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: s ' SUBJECT: ..5;42 di +� E' TC,)"114-4--/- DATE: / 3 ir'+ IN FAVOR: ❑ Name: 1 j NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION .m�...-_.__.-- GrP� �V Representing: 5o'r'' ©`-0'rt.t-, 1-4& Address: , a /L City: 114 tr. Telephone No: Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: SUBJECT: 9)G V( 'S DATE: "?-- 7 IN FAVOR: ❑ Name: UTRAL: ❑ . IN OPPOSITION: Representing: _ J C ✓' Address: City: � - j= Telephone No: Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COU,IL AGENDA ITEM#: J: SUBJECT - DATE: IN FAVbR: ❑ NEUTRAL: CI IN OPPOSITION: Name: Representing: N ✓J:'�'G t J % lG� G,t-l;rJ�'� . Address: ,,ll°cL-- ,7f City: C-',U Telephone No: ! J 6?2/[�J r j Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are, limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE. START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK K CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: 4i SUBJECT: DATE: e9`" 0 c7 IN FAVOR: NEUTRAL: ❑ Name: `%.#Y 4-1-11(/1- IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Representing: Address: l /6 Gt- /'U/2 City: /7/17 1JEE% C?:-/X/ O Telephone No: zd 7 `2 id er Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. SUBJECT: IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Name: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: 5 Li DATE: IN FAVOR: NEUTRAL: ❑ Representing: Address: �a L. "1 �-�1 - `✓' �1 \ - °� ~ a City: st"4').Q Telephone No: Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: DATE: IN FAVO Name: Represen SUBJECT: NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: 0 Address: CO( J\ T ����" City: C Q-&t& 6P- Telephone No: Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: S DATE: IN FAVOR: ❑� Name. '` ,2e)LC %„Rt.()/1 Representing: Address: 1,2 City: er M SUBJECT: NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: _ ❑ Telephone No: v2) Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM' SUBJECT: • DATE: f0 Cl IN F ❑ Name: Representing:' Address. City: NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ 0 C Telephone No: C131 631 tc.2 l Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK. • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#, f SUBJECT: DATE: p' ®©� IN FAVOR: )- NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: 0 Name:R /i%///L /���OR i//C) Representing: q Address:'. / City: .J%z?,�rzx-� Telephone No: Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. AGENDA ITEM September 3, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Connie Rogers -Elmore — Interim Finance Direct SUBJECT: Warrants and Disbursements —July 2009 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review and approve Warrants and Disbursements for the period of July 1 through July 31, 2009 in the amount of $ 4,440,252.76. DISCUSSION: The City Council in its oversight role formally reviews disbursements of City funds made by Accounts Payable warrants, bi-weekly payrolls and electronic funds (wire) transfers. The following information is provided for such review and approval: Warrants/Wire Pay Date Amount Accounts Payable: # 90640-90964 Various $ 3,508,417.42 Payroll: Pay Period #13 # 19804-19827 7/2/2009 $ 117,552.23 Includes Warrants, Direct Deposits, Taxes Payroll: Pay Period #14 # 19830-19846 7/16/2009 $ 115,194.84 Includes Warrants, Direct Deposits, Taxes Payroll: Pay Period #15 # 19850-19877 7/30/2009 $ 118,279.96 Includes Warrants, Direct Deposits, Taxes Electronic Funds July 2009 $ 580,808.31 Total Disbursements — Period of July 1-31, 2009 $ 4,440, Prepared by: tDepartment Head Approval Connie Rogers -Elmore, Interim Finan Concurred by: 7-4 Thomas Prili, Accounting Manager FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditures by warrant, payroll direct deposit and electronic funds (wire) transfers have been appropriated in the adjusted FY 2009-10 budget. Attachments: Accounts Payable Warrant Report — July 1-31, 2009 Electronic Funds Transfer Report —July 1-31, 2009 Note: Payroll information is on file in the Finance Department. Page 1 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90640 7/2/2009 Eastern municipal water district REQUEST 070209 REQUEST 070209 REQUEST 070209 Water service Water service Water service 025-7100-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 301-8831-500.35-10 1,809.19 10.03 2,503.66 4,322.88 90641 7/2/2009 Southern california edison 062509 Electricity service 010-6500-425.35-14 149.62 149.62 90642 7/2/2009 By our records REQUEST 070109 July 4th - band 010-2510-425.40-04 5,000.00 5,000.00 90643 7/2/2009 Eyemed vision care REQUEST 070209 REQUEST 070209 June 2009 premium June 2009 premium 085-0000-202.21-35 065-0000-201.08-64 968.10 7.64 975.74 90644 7/2/2009 First american corelogic, inc. 4049296 4049297 Annual renewal Annual renewal 011-3300-431.34-05 011-3300-431.34-05 2,050.00 2,100.00 4,150.00 90645 7/8/2009 Senior home repair, inc. 1059 1060 Work performed Work performed 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 2,777.65 1,356.44 4,134.09 90648 7/10/2009 Accela, inc. MR051890 Permits plus maint fy0910 011-3300-431.34-05 14,136.21 14,136.21 90649 7/10/2009 American rotary broom co., inc. 098922 Main broom material kit 056-4150-410.33-50 407.30 407.30 90651 7/10/2009 Ameripride uniform services L350171 L350171 L350172 L350172 L350172 L350173 L350173 L356262 L356262 L356263 L356263 L356263 L356264 L356264 Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service 050-9000-450.21-12 055-4170-450.21-12 010-4140-410.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 057-4150-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 010-7101-410.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 010-4140-410.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 057-4150-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 010-7101-410.21-35 37.63 31.30 17.08 52.38 6.46 33.70 10.00 39.97 31.30 17.08 43.53 6.46 25.47 10.00 362.36 90652 7/10/2009 Anady's trophies, inc. 72357 72378 Spot Igt plg/salad garden Desk plate/ d. fulcher 096-1700-417.36-15 010-1100-411.21-10 19.58 11.42 31.00 Page 1 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90653 7/10/2009 Archive management service, inc. 0081678 Services for june 2009 010-2500-425.30-90 630.57 630.57 90654 7/10/2009 Arrow printing, inc. 7233 2,000 business cards 010-3200-431.21-10 95.70 95.70 90655 7/10/2009 At&t REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Telephone service june 09 Telephone service june 09 Telephone service june 09 010-3100-431.35-16 010-7400-425.35-16 010-4200-410.35-16 22.67 3.59 11.83 38.09 90656 7/10/2009 B & w pipe & supply 85687 85736 85706 85715 85718 85738 85768 Misc pipe and supplies Returned goods Misc pipe and supplies Misc pipe and supplies Misc pipe and supplies Misc pipe and supplies Misc pipe and supplies 332-8831-500.21-12 332-8831-500.21-12 320-8831-500.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 123.61 -60.07 204.75 33.61 9.37 5.30 14.15 330.72 90657 7/10/2009 Ballard gas #1159 5601-277964 5601-277982 5601-278322 62.4 22.2 60.4 056-4150-410.21-70 056-4150-410.21-70 056-4150-410.21-70 81.43 30.66 84.74 196.83 90658 7/10/2009 Bank of america REQUEST 063009 Refund Ilpd 2, zone 50 350-8831-500.36-05 243,942.09 243,942.09 90659 7/10/2009 Best best & krieger, Ilp 060809 060809 060809 060809 060809 060809 060809 060809 060809 060809 060809 060809 060809 Total rda Total low mod Sjcfd 2 a 2002 Total water enterprise Total general fund Planning rev Total agreement Ad-87-1 tower wrkot Sanderson ave widening Levee right of way Levee project Alexander communities Prof srvcs thru may 31,09 096-1111-411.30-90 099-1111-411.30-90 046-8800-450.30-90 050-1111-411.30-90 010-1111-411.30-90 011-1700-417.30-90 045-8800-450.30-90 065-0000-201.08-13 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 065-0000-103.12-68 026-0000-229.07-00 102-1400-500.30-90 6,747.32 78.00 495.34 3,613.91 25,268.55 3,043.80 2,108.75 3,082.05 2,386.23 24,057.16 117.00 373.00 166.95 71,538.06 Page 2 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90660 7/10/2009 Bio-tox laboratories, inc. 20214 20215 20135 Alcohol, ethyl, blood Alcohol, ethyl, blood Alcohol, ethyl, blood 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 513.42 579.30 52.00 1,144.72 90661 7/10/2009 Bonney architects 320 Bid solicitation 199-9999-425.40-01 4,168.95 4,168.95 90662 7/10/2009 Bowman signs 00887 00888 14 decals for engine 25 Cut stripe decals 010-3200-431.33-30 010-3200-431.33-30 91.35 54.38 145.73 90663 7/10/2009 Brenntag pacific, inc. BPI903144 BPI904684 Sodium hypochlorite Sodium hypochlorite 050-9000-450.21-12 050-9000-450.21-12 1,751.11 2,477.18 4,228.29 90664 7/10/2009 Brinks home security, inc. 104718523-0609 112007067-0609 109815720-0609 Anl fee 6/11/09-6/10/2010 Monitoring 6/22-7/21/2009 Monitoring 6/26-7/25/2009 010-2500-425.34-05 010-6100-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 443.40 34.99 34.99 513.38 90665 7/10/2009 Brithinee electric 153549 Bath booster #2 050-9000-450.21-12 5,967.81 5,967.81 90666 7/10/2009 California building standards REQUEST 063009 Cbsc fees 4/1-6/30/2009 065-0000-201.09-03 352.98 352.98 90667 7/10/2009 Calp.e.r.s. H2009070839000 H2009070839000 Health premium july 2009 Health premium july 2009 085-0000-202.21-39 010-1200-412.11-17 850.22 61.71 911.93 90668 7/10/2009 Calpers REQUEST 062409 June 14,2009, type 3 085-0000-202.21-28 30,206.55 30,206.55 90669 7/10/2009 Clark's towing and recovery S19013 Tow'05 international pump 055-4170-450.33-50 175.00 175.00 90670 7/10/2009 David taussig & associates, inc. 9050026 Prof srvcs thru may 31,09 034-8850-500.30-90 2,733.20 2,733.20 90671 7/10/2009 Db backflow service (dba) 061609A 061609B 061609C Cert backflow,labor,parts Cert backflow, parts Cert backflow,labor,parts 317-8831-500.34-05 362-8831-500.34-05 362-8831-500.34-05 280.85 472.99 68.05 821.89 90672 7/10/2009 Department of conservation REQUEST 063009 Smip fees 4/1-6/30/2009 065-0000-201.08-68 130.61 130.61 90673 7/10/2009 Dewey's electric, inc. 061509 Access parking lot lights 011-1700-417.34-05 75.00 75.00 90674 7/10/2009 Diamondback fire and rescue 9247 Srvc/maint system, parts 010-3200-431.33-30 1,972.65 1,972.65 90675 7/10/2009 E.s. babcock & sons, inc. AF91189-0278 AF91243-0278 AF91244-0278 AF91639-0278 Coliforms p/a by mmo/mug Iron by icp, manganese Trihalomethanes,haloaceti Iron by icp, mn_icp_dw 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 56.00 60.00 185.00 60.00 456.00 Page 3 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90675... 7/10/2009... E.s. babcock & sons, inc.... AF91749-0278 AF91810-0278 Nitrate Coliforms p/a by mmo/mug 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 39.00 56.00 456.00... 90676 7/10/2009 Eastern municipal water district REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Water service Water service Water service Water service 010-3200-431.35-10 326-8831-500.35-10 345-8831-500.35-10 376-8831-500.35-10 387.97 2,195.35 3,013.19 3,503.42 9,099.93 90677 7/10/2009 Easy ad 90619-165 90626-85 Full page ad Full page ad 010-2510-425.40-04 010-2510-425.40-04 329.00 319.00 648.00 90678 7/10/2009 Economic development agency 2009-29 July issue ad 096-1700-417.30-90 500.00 500.00 90679 7/10/2009 Esgil corporation 07091887 Plan check fee june 2009 011-3300-431.30-90 909.35 909.35 90680 7/10/2009 Eyemed vision care REQUEST 070209 REQUEST 070209 Premium for july 2009 Premium for july 2009 085-0000-202.21-35 065-0000-201.08-64 909.67 43.22 952.89 90684 7/10/2009 Ez sunnyday landscape 6437 8364 8364 8365 8365 8365 8365 8366 8366 8367 8367 8367 8367 8368 8368 8368 8368 Monthly maint 2/07-9/08 Beautification project Beautification project Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 309-8831-500.34-05 303-8831-500.34-05 313-8831-500.34-05 326-8831-500.34-05 307-8831-500.34-05 306-8831-500.34-05 309-8831-500.34-05 025-7252-410.34-05 025-7252-410.34-05 025-7250-410.34-05 025-7251-410.34-05 025-7251-410.34-05 301-8831-500.34-05 317-8831-500.34-05 332-8831-500.34-05 307-8831-500.34-05 329-8831-500.34-05 4,000.00 2,750.00 2,750.00 400.00 250.00 170.00 495.00 600.00 4,980.00 7,145.00 1,915.80 288.40 250.00 125.00 1,380.00 1,425.00 812.50 51,316.70 Page 4 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90684... 7/10/2009... Ez sunnyday landscape... 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 8368 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvcjune 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvcjune 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvcjune 2009 Lndscpe srvcjune 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvcjune 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 303-8831-500.34-05 305-8831-500.34-05 304-8831-500.34-05 310-8831-500.34-05 345-8831-500.34-05 316-8831-500.34-05 322-8831-500.34-05 326-8831-500.34-05 321-8831-500.34-05 306-8831-500.34-05 323-8831-500.34-05 325-8831-500.34-05 331-8831-500.34-05 364-8831-500.34-05 025-7250-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 362-8831-500.34-05 309-8831-500.34-05 339-8831-500.34-05 320-8831-500.34-05 313-8831-500.34-05 338-8831-500.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 301-8831-500.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 1,050.00 725.00 300.00 140.00 1,600.00 75.00 1,400.00 1,300.00 1,100.00 550.00 355.00 550.00 200.00 100.00 195.00 180.00 425.00 400.00 400.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 500.00 1,200.00 615.00 680.00 700.00 445.00 445.00 51,316.70... Page 5 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90684... 7/10/2009... Ez sunnyday landscape... 8368 8368 8368 8368 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 Lndscpe srvc june 2009 341-8831-500.34-05 311-8831-500.34-05 311-8831-500.34-05 359-8831-500.34-05 500.00 950.00 600.00 500.00 51,316.70... 90685 7/10/2009 Failsafe testing 4432 Tested ground ladders 010-3200-431.33-30 533.55 533.55 90686 7/10/2009 Federal express 9-235-06347 9-235-06347 Delivery service Delivery service 096-1700-417.21-65 011-1700-417.21-65 28.48 24.14 52.62 90687 7/10/2009 Fitzpatrick construction 062709 Chair rail material,labor 010-3100-431.33-10 396.00 396.00 90688 7/10/2009 George e. brimhall 3 Land survey service 011-1700-417.30-90 750.00 750.00 90689 7/10/2009 Gfb-friedrich & assoc., inc. 0904-28 0904-28 0904-28 0904-28 0904-28 0904-28 Srvcs rendered april 2009 Srvcs rendered april 2009 Srvcs rendered april 2009 Srvcs rendered april 2009 Srvcs rendered april 2009 Srvcs rendered april 2009 026-0000-229.07-00 026-0000-229.07-00 026-0000-229.07-00 026-0000-229.07-00 379-8831-500.30-90 380-8831-500.30-90 45.17 45.17 45.17 45.15 45.17 45.17 271.00 90690 7/10/2009 Gibbons & conley 09MAY2417 L. fellows, claim #js0712 020-2200-419.30-90 416.16 416.16 90691 7/10/2009 Gst information technology solutior RVI305985 Hp elitebook 8530p 010-3100-431.34-04 1,871.28 1,871.28 90692 7/10/2009 Hasapes, mike REQUEST 063009 Reimburse tuition 010-2500-425.31-20 151.91 151.91 90693 7/10/2009 Hd supply waterworks, ltd. 9106814 Gate cap m/water,top sect 050-9000-450.21-12 444.09 444.09 90694 7/10/2009 Hemet valley tool & supply 48396 48511 48512 Wg 125-03-01 tool box Hose reel swivel Stihl carb assembly 050-9000-450.21-80 010-7100-410.33-30 010-7100-410.33-30 709.00 96.79 64.16 869.95 90695 7/10/2009 Home depot credit services 4181798 7081191 2255520 0082539 Primed mdf GI 2456 5 gl, hand clner Liq chlorine, mu acid 10 x 14 notres 010-3100-431.33-10 050-9000-450.33-30 010-8400-425.21-12 010-8400-425.21-12 21.83 178.85 315.55 15.99 532.22 90696 7/10/2009 Horizon water 9-C-2500-062209 9-C-3100-062209 9-C-3300-062209 Drinking water service Drinking water service Drinking water service 010-2500-425.21-10 010-3100-431.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 22.50 81.00 22.50 220.50 Page 6 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90696... 7/10/2009... Horizon water... 9-C-4200-062209 9-C-7400-062209 Drinking water service Drinking water service 010-4200-410.21-10 010-7400-425.21-10 63.00 31.50 220.50... 90697 7/10/2009 Infosend inc. 37599 37599 37599 Statements mailed June 09 Statements mailed june 09 Statements mailed June 09 050-1400-414.34-05 055-1400-414.34-05 059-1400-414.34-05 165.71 165.72 165.72 497.15 90698 7/10/2009 Inland foundation eng. inc. 15207 Progress bill for may 09 199-9999-425.40-01 4,030.30 4,030.30 90699 7/10/2009 Johnson power systems dba SW030090678 Level 2 maintenance 050-9000-450.21-12 994.77 994.77 90700 7/10/2009 Kalpesh homes REQUEST 063009 Reimb assessments 377-8831-500.36-05 9,006.35 9,006.35 90701 7/10/2009 Karl's tractor service 2303 2304 Weed abatement/pelican hm Weed abatement/276 dusk 105-3320-431.34-05 105-3320-431.34-05 600.00 569.47 1,169.47 90702 7/10/2009 Kustom signals, inc. 392889 Shipping charge 024-3100-431.33-11 11.00 11.00 90703 7/10/2009 La strada contracting company,inc 2179-02 2179-02 Schedule 1,chg ord 1 & 2 10% retention withheld 199-9999-425.40-01 199-0000-210.20-25 14,358.18 -1,435.82 12,922.36 90704 7/10/2009 Lake hemet municipal water distric 060409 060809 Water srvc 0 agape Water srvc bastille way 322-8831-500.35-10 302-8831-500.35-10 1,656.88 303.46 1,960.34 90705 7/10/2009 Leslie's pool supplies, inc. 443-180827 Labor repair, acid 2x1 010-8400-425.21-12 1,507.03 1,507.03 90706 7/10/2009 Lor geotechnical group, inc. 12654 12655 12700 12701 Billing 3/30 to 5/3/09 Billing 3/30 to 5/3/09 Billing 5/4 to 5/31/09 Billing 5/4 to 5/31/09 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 1,195.00 180.00 1,982.00 3,515.00 6,872.00 90707 7/10/2009 Master care commercial janitorial 3153 3165 Janitorial srvc June 2009 Janitorial srvc June 2009 010-2500-425.34-05 010-7400-425.34-05 2,140.00 1,083.00 3,223.00 90708 7/10/2009 Michael brandman associates, inc. 00046775 Prof srvcs 3/28-4/24/09 065-0000-201.08-55 5,080.00 5,080.00 90709 7/10/2009 National safety compliance, inc. 43285 Dqf on-line monthly fee 010-1210-412.30-90 540.00 540.00 90710 7/10/2009 Nbs local government solutions D06220901-PP CO6200912 CO6200912 Delinquent mgmt srvcs Admin fees 7/1/09-9/30/09 Admin fees 7/1/09-9/30/09 046-8800-450.30-90 046-8800-450.30-90 201-8850-500.30-90 1,575.00 2,254.99 891.44 4,721.43 90711 7/10/2009 Ontrac 6481597 Delivery service 010-1110-411.21-65 18.39 33.39 Page 7 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90711... 7/10/2009... Ontrac... 6481597 Delivery service fee 010-2500-425.21-65 15.00 33.39... 90712 7/10/2009 Overnight industrial 45930 46022 46042 46121 46151 46151 46151 Carpet spotter,hand brush Disposable gloves Toilet tissue,blk liners Hand santitzer Battery pk,toil tis,twls Battery pk,toil tis, twls Battery pk,toil tis, twls 010-7100-410.21-12 010-4140-410.21-14 010-7100-410.21-12 055-4170-450.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-4150-410.21-12 050-9000-450.21-12 10.65 7.61 135.56 88.09 44.89 44.90 44.90 376.60 90713 7/10/2009 Pacific alarm service,inc. R 86587 R 86587 R 86587 R 86587 Alarm service july 2009 Alarm service july 2009 Alarm service july 2009 Alarm service july 2009 010-6500-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 050-9000-450.34-05 010-4200-410.34-05 38.00 248.50 189.50 217.50 693.50 90714 7/10/2009 Pacific shores construction inc. 7032 7409 7410 7411 Mow, edge, weed planters Mow, edge, weed planters Mow, edge, weed planters Mow, edge, weed planters 105-3320-431.34-05 105-3320-431.34-05 105-3320-431.34-05 105-3320-431.34-05 320.00 320.00 195.00 570.00 1,405.00 90715 7/10/2009 Pacificare of california 1002148543 1002148543 Premium july 2009 Premium july 2009 085-0000-202.21-39 065-0000-201.08-64 42,576.25 2,561.95 45,138.20 90716 7/10/2009 Pip printing 107050 11x17 laminate/bath well 050-9000-450.36-10 2.69 2.69 90717 7/10/2009 Pitney bowes inc. 9372187-JN09 Rental fee 010-3100-431.21-65 47.00 47.00 90718 7/10/2009 Plumbers depot, inc. PD-11452 Hose,sewer, hose 6",misc 055-4170-450.33-30 3,371.86 3,371.86 90719 7/10/2009 Poster compliance center 1776792-CA 1 yr compliance plan 010-1210-412.30-90 226.15 226.15 90720 7/10/2009 Preferred benefit insurance admin. CP10070 CP10070 Grp #7529-0015, 2010-0009 Grp #7529-0015, 2010-0009 085-0000-202.21-32 065-0000-201.08-64 4,201.21 312.33 4,513.54 90721 7/10/2009 Press enterprise 56479172 56479911 56479912 56480391 56480392 Advertising Advertising Advertising Advertising Advertising 199-9999-425.40-01 011-1700-417.36-25 011-1700-417.36-25 102-1400-500.30-90 025-7250-410.30-90 232.10 40.20 40.20 345.40 61.16 1,164.70 Page 8 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90721... 7/10/2009... Press enterprise... 56480392 56480392 56480392 56480392 56480393 56481353 Advertising Advertising Advertising Advertising Advertising Advertising 025-7251-410.30-90 025-7252-410.30-90 025-7260-410.30-90 025-7100-410.30-90 011-1700-417.36-25 011-1700-417.36-25 61.16 61.16 61.16 61.16 165.00 36.00 1,164.70... 90722 7/10/2009 Probity automotive specialists,inc. 235 Work performed lic#371071 050-9000-450.33-50 58.07 58.07 90723 7/10/2009 Purchase power 061209 Postage 010-3100-431.21-65 318.99 318.99 90724 7/10/2009 Ramona tire, inc. 4609 Work performed '07 impala 010-1200-412.21-70 536.28 536.28 90725 7/10/2009 Reliable office supplies, inc. BL253100 BL253101 BL247200 BL247200 BL247200 BL256300 BL253100 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 096-1700-417.21-10 010-1210-412.21-10 096-1700-417.21-10 011-1700-417.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 113.45 21.47 72.60 72.60 114.72 222.84 13.46 631.14 90726 7/10/2009 Resource strategies, inc. RSII1572 09 digital aerial imagery 011-3300-431.40-45 1,413.75 1,413.75 90727 7/10/2009 Richard pope and associates 3883 Prof srvcs thru 6/29/09 199-9999-425.40-01 596.39 596.39 90728 7/10/2009 Riverside county department of AR0029310 AR0023985 AR0023987 AR0067692 Artesia well, #fa0024207 Bath well, fac#fa0018882 Grand well,fac# fa0018884 Park well, fac #fa0031731 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 688.00 688.00 1,314.00 688.00 3,378.00 90729 7/10/2009 Riverside county sheriff departmer SH0000011920 SH0000011947 Booking fees may 2009 Jail access mar -may 2009 010-3100-431.30-19 010-3100-431.30-19 866.91 47,720.31 48,587.22 90730 7/10/2009 Riverside county sheriff departmer SH0000011745 SH0000011745 SH0000011745 Contract law 3/26-4/22/09 Contract law 3/26-4/22/09 Contract law 3/26-4/22/09 010-3100-431.34-04 034-3100-431.34-04 010-3100-431.34-04 478,061.18 69,404.67 5,732.32 553,198.17 90731 7/10/2009 Riverside, county of 90088-0906 I.t. srvc for june 2009 017-2290-418.34-20 13,558.44 13,558.44 90732 7/10/2009 Schweitzer appraisals, inc. 061909-CORDERO S. cordero draw rqst 1 199-9999-425.40-01 300.00 1,200.00 Page 9 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90732... 7/10/2009... Schweitzer appraisals, inc.... 061909-HOSTETTE 061909-THOMPSO 061909-VAZQUEZ S. hostetter draw rqst 1 L. thompson draw rqst 1 P & m vazquez draw rqst 1 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 300.00 300.00 300.00 1,200.00... 90733 7/10/2009 Score 503 4 Workshop/internet mkting 096-1700-417.30-90 300.00 300.00 90734 7/10/2009 Shred it 050339210 Shredding service 010-2500-425.34-05 90.00 90.00 90735 7/10/2009 Smart & final 177251 189241 Kitchen supplies Misc food & supplies 010-2500-425.21-10 010-4200-410.21-10 40.60 112.58 153.18 90736 7/10/2009 South coast a.q.m.d. 2073272 2074503 Flat fee for emissions lc e em elec gen diesel 050-9000-450.35-14 050-9000-450.35-14 109.00 293.21 402.21 90740 7/10/2009 Southern california edison REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service 010-2500-425.35-14 010-3100-431.35-14 010-4200-410.35-14 010-7400-425.35-14 025-7100-410.35-14 025-7250-410.35-14 025-7251-410.35-14 025-7252-410.35-14 025-7260-410.35-14 050-9000-450.35-14 201-8850-500.35-14 306-8831-500.35-14 320-8831-500.35-14 321-8831-500.35-14 323-8831-500.35-14 329-8831-500.35-14 338-8831-500.35-14 010-4150-410.35-14 010-4150-410.35-14 025-7260-410.35-14 2,097.71 1,539.36 38.57 1,235.42 1,508.63 953.50 19.20 1,107.17 309.08 18,113.13 67.19 40.76 70.29 36.80 60.33 25.37 18.56 330.16 0.04 44.14 28,223.72 Page 10 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90740... 7/10/2009... Southern california edison... REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service 025-7260-410.35-14 301-8831-500.35-14 302-8831-500.35-14 305-8831-500.35-14 347-8831-500.35-14 349-8831-500.35-14 304-8831-500.35-14 310-8831-500.35-14 318-8831-500.35-14 319-8832-500.35-14 322-8831-500.35-14 324-8831-500.35-14 333-8831-500.35-14 334-8831-500.35-14 335-8831-500.35-14 336-8831-500.35-14 337-8831-500.35-14 339-8831-500.35-14 342-8831-500.35-14 347-8831-500.35-14 349-8831-500.35-14 359-8831-500.35-14 367-8831-500.35-14 372-8831-500.35-14 375-8831-500.35-14 106.89 22.38 234.49 151.18 5.52 5.52 2.58 1.10 3.89 5.80 19.62 3.89 0.64 0.40 0.45 0.52 0.29 0.57 0.22 7.60 7.60 11.61 6.54 3.89 5.12 28,223.72... 90741 7/10/2009 Star auto parts 50946 51421 51496 51522 Hex bt 3/8"dr 7 pc set Micro glove Non-detrgnt 30 Parts unit 412, 418 055-4170-450.33-50 010-7100-410.21-12 010-4150-410.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 20.65 10.86 5.43 19.54 98.77 Page 11 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90741... 7/10/2009... Star auto parts... 52096 Misc supplies 010-3200-431.33-50 42.29 98.77... 90742 7/10/2009 State controller's office 0005477 Annual street rprt 07/08 021-1400-414.30-90 1,856.85 1,856.85 90743 7/10/2009 State controller's office REQUEST 070109 Audit fee confirmation 010-1400-414.30-90 100.00 100.00 90744 7/10/2009 Stater bros 1210617 1210617 Beverages & snacks Beverages & snacks 010-1100-411.31-20 096-1700-417.31-20 8.40 13.25 21.65 90745 7/10/2009 Stockton, tim REQUEST 061809 Reimb cwea cert renewal 055-4170-450.31-20 61.00 61.00 90746 7/10/2009 Strattons janitorial service (dba) 09-212 Strip, seal, wax floors 010-3100-431.34-05 100.00 100.00 90747 7/10/2009 Subbarayan krishnan, m.d. BRYBI00 2768 Dmv cpe 010-1210-412.30-90 67.00 67.00 90748 7/10/2009 Sun trust equipment finance & 1264044 1264044 1264044 1264044 1264044 1264044 1264045 1264045 1264045 1264045 Debt srvc- equip sched 01 Debt srvc- equip sched 01 Debt srvc- equip sched 01 Debt srvc- equip sched 01 Debt srvc- equip sched 01 Debt srvc- equip sched 01 Debt srvc- equip sched 02 Debt srvc- equip sched 02 Debt srvc- equip sched 02 Debt srvc- equip sched 02 010-4140-410.60-10 010-4140-410.60-15 010-4150-410.60-10 010-4150-410.60-15 010-7100-410.60-10 010-7100-410.60-15 010-4140-410.60-10 010-4140-410.60-15 056-4150-410.60-10 056-4150-410.60-15 5,696.57 950.99 9,558.65 1,595.72 15,448.32 2,578.95 13,483.81 3,767.02 16,575.22 4,630.67 74,285.92 90749 7/10/2009 Superior ready mix concrete 337202 337883 338333 520-c-2500 r.c.t.d. appr 520-c-2500 r.c.t.d. appr 520-c-2500 r.c.t.d. appr 063-1700-410.40-01 063-1700-410.40-01 063-1700-410.40-01 1,057.59 1,057.59 1,216.23 3,331.41 90750 7/10/2009 Tbla landscape architects 09-06-001 Formatting,planting,irrig 199-9999-425.40-01 5,325.00 5,325.00 90751 7/10/2009 United communities network 5537 5538 5548 Repair & maint kiosk Repair & maint kiosk Repair & maint kiosk 010-1750-425.34-05 010-1750-425.34-05 010-1750-425.34-05 790.00 135.00 560.00 1,485.00 90752 7/10/2009 Urs corporation 3806858 Prof srvcs ending 2/27/09 065-0000-201.06-40 1,291.92 1,291.92 90753 7/10/2009 Usa mobility wireless, inc. 56226464E 56226464E On call pager service On call pager service 010-4150-410.35-16 050-9000-450.35-16 10.07 24.26 34.33 90754 7/10/2009 Verizon california REQUEST 063009 Telephone services 010-2500-425.35-16 265.26 558.77 Page 12 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90754... 7/10/2009... Verizon california... REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 070609 REQUEST 070609 REQUEST 070609 Telephone services Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service 010-3110-431.35-16 010-6500-425.35-16 305-8831-500.35-10 322-8831-500.35-10 183.43 33.07 38.91 38.10 558.77... 90755 7/10/2009 Western riverside council 20090612A 08/09 clean city dues 063-1700-410.30-16 1,000.00 1,000.00 90756 7/10/2009 Western riverside council REQUEST 063009 Tumf fees june 2009 065-0000-201.08-80 29,436.00 29,436.00 90757 7/10/2009 Xerox corporation 041467222 041367823 041467224 106900834 Lease june 2009 Lease june 2009 Lease june 2009 Overcharged sales tax 010-2500-425.34-05 010-7400-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 2,992.28 235.41 785.08 -2.20 4,010.57 90759 7/10/2009 Avi-con, inc. ca construction 4983 Retention release 199-0000-210.20-25 3,339.80 3,339.80 90760 7/10/2009 Avi-con, inc. ca construction 4983 4983 Retention release Retention release 199-0000-210.20-25 199-0000-210.20-25 2,390.00 -2,390.00 0.00 90761 7/10/2009 Avi-con, inc. ca construction 4983 Retention release 199-0000-210.20-25 4,330.00 4,330.00 90762 7/10/2009 Avi-con, inc. ca construction 4983 Retention release 199-0000-210.20-25 2,034.50 2,034.50 90763 7/10/2009 Avi-con, inc. ca construction 4983 Retention release 199-0000-210.20-25 1,760.00 1,760.00 90764 7/10/2009 Avi-con, inc. ca construction 4983 4983 Retention release Retention release 199-0000-210.20-25 199-0000-210.20-25 16,328.19 -16,328.19 0.00 90767 7/24/2009 Abm janitorial services (dba) 185199 185200 Janitorial srvc july 2009 Janitorial srvc july 2009 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3110-431.34-05 924.00 157.25 1,081.25 90768 7/24/2009 Accident reconstruction journal 070109 1 yr subscription 024-3100-431.36-10 49.00 49.00 90769 7/24/2009 Advantage reo REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 60.44 60.44 90770 7/24/2009 Aflac 678736 REQUEST 063009 Premium june 2009 Adjustment june 2009 085-0000-202.21-27 085-0000-202.21-27 1,824.04 99.22 1,923.26 90771 7/24/2009 Albert a. webb associates 901534 901721 901858 901867 Srvcs render thru 4/25/09 Srvcs render thru 5/23/09 Srvcs render thru 5/23/09 Srvcs render thru 5/23/09 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 7,848.47 10,879.61 46,054.00 27,761.60 92,543.68 Page 13 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number, Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90772 7/24/2009 American forensic nurses 56992 6 blood draws 010-3100-431.34-05 237.00 237.00 90773 7/24/2009 American planning associaton 150919-090601PB Apa membrship,chapt/caie 011-1700-417.30-16 450.00 450.00 90775 7/24/2009 Ameripride uniform services L362352 L362352 L362353 L362353 L362353 L362354 L362354 L362355 L368394 L368394 L368395 L368395 L368395 L368396 L368396 Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service Uniform service 050-9000-450.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 010-4140-410.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 057-4150-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 010-7101-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 010-4140-410.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 057-4150-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 010-7101-410.21-35 34.63 31.30 17.08 45.03 6.46 30.00 7.63 16.85 31.30 34.63 17.08 43.53 6.46 30.00 7.63 359.61 90776 7/24/2009 Anady's trophies, inc. 72514 8x10 plq diam vly honda 010-3100-431.21-10 65.25 65.25 90777 7/24/2009 Armorcast products company, inc. 0113234-IN Rotocast boxes,rpm covers 199-9999-425.40-01 1,779.12 1,779.12 90778 7/24/2009 Arrow printing, inc. 6991 4,100 ccr 050-9000-450.36-10 851.51 851.51 90779 7/24/2009 At&t 951 487-7381 951 487-7382 951 487-7384 951 487-7386 Long distance service Long distance service Long distance service Long distance service 050-9000-450.35-16 010-4200-410.35-16 010-4200-410.35-16 010-4200-410.35-16 108.92 25.42 33.87 63.07 231.28 90780 7/24/2009 At&t mobility 877559874X0622 Mobile phone service 010-3100-431.35-17 266.48 266.48 90781 7/24/2009 B & w pipe & supply 85813 85822 85856 85874 Pipe & misc supplies Pipe & misc supplies Pipe & misc supplies Pipe & misc supplies 010-7100-410.21-12 010-2510-425.40-04 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 11.16 21.36 54.03 37.64 124.19 Page 14 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90782 7/24/2009 Ballard gas #1159 277911 278076 278281 5601-278373 5601-278415 5601-278447 5601-278466 5601-278504 60.20 propane 75.0 propane 58.20 propane 64.7 propane 27.1 propane 49.3 propane 46.1 propane 66.4 propane 056-4150-410.21-70 056-4150-410.21-70 056-4150-410.21-70 056-4150-410.21-70 056-4150-410.21-70 056-4150-410.21-70 056-4150-410.21-70 056-4150-410.21-70 78.56 110.08 80.38 90.76 38.01 69.16 64.67 93.87 625.49 90783 7/24/2009 Bank of america business card REQUEST 063009 Best beverage catering 010-0000-103.12-34 923.94 923.94 90784 7/24/2009 Bank of america business card REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Staples Arrow restaurant equip. Scottys embroidery 010-3200-431.21-10 010-3200-431.33-10 010-3200-431.33-30 61.94 163.13 195.75 420.82 90785 7/24/2009 Bank of america business card REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Walmart Amazon.com 010-0000-103.12-34 102-1400-500.21-10 78.30 32.13 110.43 90786 7/24/2009 Bank of sacramento 041516 Escrow #6362-019,retentio 199-0000-210.20-25 700.00 700.00 90787 7/24/2009 Bj sporting goods, inc. 3983 4157 Work boots/ d. carrico Work boots/a. zubia 010-4140-410.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 107.65 200.00 307.65 90788 7/24/2009 Blanca bernardino REQUEST 063009 Replaces ck#85768,7/11/08 050-0000-229.08-70 4.19 4.19 90789 7/24/2009 Boot barn IVC0008677 Work boots/g. gonzales 010-4150-410.21-35 117.44 117.44 90790 7/24/2009 Brenntag pacific, inc. BPI908102 BPl909807 Sodium hypochlorite Sodium hypochlorite 050-9000-450.21-12 050-9000-450.21-12 1,186.63 1,117.26 2,303.89 90791 7/24/2009 Brian barr REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 16.63 16.63 90792 7/24/2009 Bw real estate REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 79.24 79.24 90793 7/24/2009 C r & r incorporated REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Trash & recycling may 09 Billing charge may 2009 059-8052-450.34-05 059-0000-310.07-99 164,878.30 -10,024.00 154,854.30 90794 7/24/2009 California association for local 070109 Membership renew 09/10 096-1200-412.31-20 465.00 465.00 90795 7/24/2009 Calpers REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 070909 REQUEST 071609 Additional 6/28/09,type 4 Contrib june 28,09,type 4 Contribjuly 12,09,type 3 085-0000-202.21-28 085-0000-202.21-28 085-0000-202.21-28 1,444.01 29,378.67 28,101.00 58,923.68 Page 15 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90796 7/24/2009 Ced consolidated electrical 2983-468055 2983-468098 2983-468130 2983-468143 2983-468277 2983-468192 2983-468200 2983-468222 2983-468227 2983-468252 2983-468265 Schedule-40 conduit Galv fittings & bushings Switch 130v lamp,75w quartz lamp Qtz black bullet flood .75kva tfmr Safety lkout tag 5/crd Thhn-8-black-stranded Lkg flush receptacle,misc 2p-120/240v-20a cb 1-gang box ext 11 in depth 010-4150-410.33-10 010-4150-410.33-10 055-4170-450.33-50 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-4150-410.21-12 050-9000-450.21-12 010-4150-410.21-12 010-4150-410.21-12 010-4150-410.21-12 010-4150-410.21-12 6.62 21.50 11.01 124.29 44.96 222.94 51.00 131.55 42.40 11.18 3.40 670.85 90797 7/24/2009 Central county united way REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 071609 Add'I contrib june 2009 Contributions july 2009 085-0000-202.21-80 085-0000-202.21-80 10.19 374.00 384.19 90798 7/24/2009 Christopher walker REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 49.99 49.99 90799 7/24/2009 Clark's towing and recovery S19018 Towed unit 478 056-4150-410.33-50 75.00 75.00 90800 7/24/2009 Coldwell banker pioneer real estatf REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 15.50 15.50 90801 7/24/2009 Comserco, inc. 01/MA50218732 Maint billing july 2009 010-4200-410.34-05 86.10 86.10 90802 7/24/2009 Crop production services, inc. 602-86868 Roundup pesticide 010-7101-410.21-12 34.09 34.09 90803 7/24/2009 Crossroads software, inc. 5327A Yrly maint & support,upgr 024-3100-431.34-05 2,000.00 2,000.00 90804 7/24/2009 Culton corporation REQUEST 071609 REQUEST 071609 REQUEST 071609 REQUEST 071609 REQUEST 071609 REQUEST 071609 REQUEST 071609 REQUEST 071609 Wtr deposit rfnd acct6346 Wtr deposit rfnd acct6347 Wtr deposit rfnd acct6348 Wtr deposit rfnd acct6349 Wtr deposit rfnd acct6350 Wtr deposit rfnd acct6352 Wtr deposit rfnd acct6354 Credit bal rind acct 6361 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-308.09-10 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 20.99 860.99 90805 7/24/2009 Cyprexx services Ilc REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 69.10 69.10 90806 7/24/2009 D & I wheeler enterprises inc. 04 07/15/2009 Final billing 199-9999-425.40-01 242,757.99 218,482.19 Page 16 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90806... 7/24/2009... D & I wheeler enterprises inc.... 04 07/15/2009 10% retention withheld 199-0000-210.20-25 -24,275.80 218,482.19... 90807 7/24/2009 David leonard associates 063009 Contract plann srvcs 6/09 065-0000-201.21-04 2,996.00 2,996.00 90808 7/24/2009 David taussig & associates, inc. 9060367 Prof srvcs thru 6/30/2009 034-8850-500.30-90 708.95 708.95 90810 7/24/2009 Db backflow service (dba) 063009A 062909C 063009C 062909D 063009D 062909E 063009E 062909F 063009F 062909G 062909H 0629091 062909J 062909K 062909L 062909M 062909N 0629090 062909P 063009E Certified backflow test Cert backflow test, labor Certified backflow test Cert backflow test, labor Certified backflow test Certified backflow test Certified backflow test Certified backflow test Certified backflow test Certified backflow test Certified backflow test Cert backflow test, labor Certified backflow test Certified backflow test Certified backflow test Cert backflow test, labor Cert backflow test, labor Certified backflow test Certified backflow test Cert backflow test, labor 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7100-410.34-05 40.00 80.00 40.00 80.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 171.89 40.00 40.00 40.00 80.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 80.00 1,091.89 90811 7/24/2009 Dell XD8R5XCT5 XD8RC57J9 Govt essen win srvr bndl Govt essen win srvr bndl 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 430.54 393.62 824.16 90812 7/24/2009 Department of toxic substances REQUEST 070709 Annual fees epa id number 010-4150-410.33-10 150.00 150.00 90813 7/24/2009 Dewey pest control (dba) 5223219 5239956 5213095 Pest control srvc july 09 Pest control srvc july 09 Pest control srvc july 09 010-2500-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 010-3200-431.34-05 45.00 40.00 32.00 147.00 Page 17 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90813... 7/24/2009... Dewey pest control (dba)... 5236494 Pest control srvc july 09 010-3200-431.34-05 30.00 147.00... 90814 7/24/2009 Dgvm v34 inc REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 12.10 12.10 90815 7/24/2009 Dolores arciniega REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 61.90 61.90 90816 7/24/2009 Dominica dahl REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 197.31 197.31 90817 7/24/2009 Donald miller REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 7.09 7.09 90818 7/24/2009 Dudek & associates, inc. 20092043 Services 4/25 to 5/29/09 065-0000-201.21-04 39,833.00 39,833.00 90819 7/24/2009 E.s. babcock & sons, inc. AF92419-0278 AF92458-0278 AG90140-0278 AG90213-0278 AG90410-0278 Pechlorate, iron by icp Coliforms p/a by mmo/mug Perchlorate,nitrate,iron Coliforms p/a by mmo/mug General physical analysis 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 210.00 56.00 93.00 56.00 25.00 440.00 90820 7/24/2009 E&e tires 7308 4 tires unit # 320 050-9000-450.33-50 520.00 520.00 90822 7/24/2009 Eastern municipal water district REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7251-410.35-10 025-7252-410.35-10 055-4170-450.35-10 301-8831-500.35-10 303-8831-500.35-10 304-8831-500.35-10 305-8831-500.35-10 306-8831-500.35-10 307-8831-500.35-10 310-8831-500.35-10 313-8831-500.35-10 317-8831-500.35-10 321-8831-500.35-10 323-8831-500.35-10 325-8831-500.35-10 326-8831-500.35-10 572.35 1,574.49 106.56 26.39 204.97 883.46 21.61 1,130.40 389.77 2,516.70 72.91 1,694.21 13.59 546.21 521.51 756.73 369.77 18,698.71 Page 18 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90822... 7/24/2009... Eastern municipal water district... REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service Water service 327-8831-500.35-10 331-8831-500.35-10 332-8831-500.35-10 338-8831-500.35-10 341-8831-500.35-10 345-8831-500.35-10 359-8831-500.35-10 362-8831-500.35-10 248.33 147.50 965.38 3,263.52 1,772.19 10.03 699.65 190.48 18,698.71... 90823 7/24/2009 Easy -ad 90703-100 Full page ad/remain bal 010-2510-425.40-04 149.00 149.00 90824 7/24/2009 Farha and associates REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 81.05 81.05 90825 7/24/2009 Federal express 9-250-52737 Delivery service 010-4200-410.21-65 22.42 22.42 90826 7/24/2009 Fm lock and safe,inc. 66588 66612 61274 66647 Duplicate keys Duplicate keys Duplicate keys Lock and keys 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 055-4170-450.33-30 055-4170-450.21-12 23.93 11.96 14.68 28.28 78.85 90827 7/24/2009 Galls an aramark company 59843267-0101 Square gear bag 010-3100-431.21-80 188.90 188.90 90828 7/24/2009 Hartford life insurance companies REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 070909 REQUEST 071709 June 5, 2009, grp# 109947 July 2, 09, grp # 109947 July 16,09, grp # 109947 085-0000-202.21-29 085-0000-202.21-29 085-0000-202.21-29 50.00 2,699.00 2,699.00 5,448.00 90829 7/24/2009 Hd supply waterworks, ltd. 9179911 6x8, 6x6, 6x14 ci hyd b/o 199-9999-425.40-01 396.79 396.79 90830 7/24/2009 Hemet industrial supply 34895 34987 34993 34995 35003 35006 35010 2 bolt flange bearing Truck side box Truck side box # 308 1" set collar Rainboots size 13 Powder free gloves Nuts, bolts, wahers 056-4150-410.33-50 055-4170-450.21-80 050-9000-450.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 055-4170-450.21-35 055-4170-450.21-12 055-4170-450.21-12 366.04 574.00 581.34 3.37 26.05 129.40 11.14 1,691.34 90831 7/24/2009 Hemet oil inc. 542282 Fb megaflow hyd aw 46 050-9000-450.21-12 437.44 437.44 90832 7/24/2009 Hemet valley pipe & supply 128482 Pipe/grand chlorine line 050-9000-450.21-12 50.50 427.13 Page 19 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90832... 7/24/2009... Hemet valley pipe & supply... 128488 128227 128356 128421 128516 128702 Wrenches/dan's toolbox Trench shovel, chnllock Pvc, plugs, fip caps Hunter pgj 06 adj arc rot Steel gee coups Tee 3/4 x 3/4 x 1 gal 050-9000-450.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-4140-410.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 050-9000-450.21-12 050-9000-450.33-30 105.34 44.28 26.65 144.31 47.50 8.55 427.13... 90833 7/24/2009 Hemet valley tool & supply 48073 48723 Grding wheel,cutoff blade Oil filter 010-7100-410.21-12 010-4150-410.33-50 13.59 14.08 27.67 90834 7/24/2009 Hermenegildo leal REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 64.82 64.82 90835 7/24/2009 Hi -way safety, inc. 93480 60 various corrug signs 010-2510-425.40-04 297.54 297.54 90836 7/24/2009 Home depot credit services 9253810 5081518 0231430 7563752 5098487 6240195 1101263 0251316 0251318 Drip irrigation spk parts 18w quad 16 oz. grtstf Hamr,plier,chisel,wrench Tools for new gmc Muric acid/sallee pool Csvelpsgl vsc, bl 5 dsl Liq chlorine,gran san&sho Small tools 010-3200-431.33-10 010-2510-425.40-04 010-2510-425.40-04 050-9000-450.21-80 055-4170-450.21-80 010-8400-425.21-12 050-9000-450.33-10 010-8400-425.21-12 010-7100-410.21-80 28.63 39.02 12.92 158.41 386.36 141.20 42.24 330.84 306.45 1,446.07 90837 7/24/2009 I.b. reprographics 92237 92242 92347 92386 92415 Estudillo landscape Digital ppc Digital ppc Digital ppc Digital ppc 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 50.90 679.27 216.06 302.54 270.12 1,518.89 90838 7/24/2009 l.c.w.a. REQUEST 070909 New mber fee/d.mudrovich 050-9000-450.31-20 27.00 27.00 90839 7/24/2009 lcma retirement trust REQUEST 070909 REQUEST 071709 July 2, 09, grp # 300434 July 16, 09, grp # 300434 085-0000-202.21-29 085-0000-202.21-29 1,500.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 90840 7/24/2009 Infosend inc. 37332 37332 Statements mailed may 09 Statements mailed may 09 050-1400-414.34-05 059-1400-414.34-05 745.51 745.51 5,903.65 Page 20 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90840... 7/24/2009... Infosend inc.... 37332 37538 37539 37849 37849 37849 Statements mailed may 09 Housing rehab prog insert '08 wtr qlty rprt inserts Statements mailed June 09 Statements mailed June 09 Statements mailed June 09 055-1400-414.34-05 199-9999-425.40-01 050-9000-450.36-10 059-1400-414.34-05 055-1400-414.34-05 050-1400-414.34-05 745.51 1,038.11 64.68 1,079.84 742.24 742.25 5,903.65... 90841 7/24/2009 Ironman parts & service 236023 RI Horizon system & install 063-1700-410.40-45 14,298.82 14,298.82 90842 7/24/2009 J & m air conditioning (dba) 96863 97049 96956 Replaced dual cap Spring maintenance Repair/service 010-3110-431.33-10 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3110-431.33-10 245.00 400.00 425.00 1,070.00 90843 7/24/2009 Jason harper assoc REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 28.21 28.21 90844 7/24/2009 Jeffery barr REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 071609 Water deposit refund Water deposit refund Credit balance refund 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-308.09-10 87.33 168.91 60.44 316.68 90845 7/24/2009 Johnson machinery co. SW000147183 Repl governor cntrl link 010-4150-410.33-50 650.31 650.31 90846 7/24/2009 Joni b. goodman 09/4/5/6 09-1A Srvcs april-june 2009 Final bill 08/09 contract 010-2500-425.30-90 010-2500-425.30-90 2,640.00 1,996.15 4,636.15 90847 7/24/2009 Joses automotive repair,inc. 10330 Work performed unit 953 010-3320-431.33-50 307.71 307.71 90848 7/24/2009 Josie cortez REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 141.71 141.71 90849 7/24/2009 Kalban, inc. 0904-2 0904-2 Progress billing no. 2 10% retention withheld 199-9999-425.40-01 199-0000-210.20-25 335,304.45 -33,530.44 301,774.01 90850 7/24/2009 Kammeyer & associates inc. 9829S 9830S Lndscpe architect srvcs Lndscpe architect srvcs 065-0000-201.06-20 065-0000-201.06-20 1,501.80 2,700.00 4,201.80 90851 7/24/2009 Katrina castro REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 9.56 9.56 90852 7/24/2009 Keeton kreitzer consulting KKC-0126 Srvcs period end 6/30/09 096-1700-417.30-90 1,050.00 1,050.00 90853 7/24/2009 La strada construction REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 327.52 327.52 90854 7/24/2009 Lancaster contract survey compan 09-042 09-044 Survey srvc may 2009 Survey srvc april 27, 09 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 5,555.00 395.00 5,950.00 Page 21 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90855 7/24/2009 Language line services 2269157 Language line service 010-3100-431.35-16 10.21 10.21 90856 7/24/2009 Lincoln life REQUEST 070909 REQUEST 071709 July 2, 09 grp # gp46828 July 16,09 grp # gp46828 085-0000-202.21-29 085-0000-202.21-29 100.00 100.00 200.00 90857 7/24/2009 Mah electric inc. 09-0221 09-0221 09-0221 Check pumps, switches Check pumps, switches Repair sewer pump 307-8831-500.33-30 332-8831-500.33-30 055-4170-450.33-30 196.00 196.00 1,137.28 1,529.28 90858 7/24/2009 Maintenance superintendents ass( REQUEST 070709 09/10 and dues/b. mulcock 010-4150-410.31-20 60.00 60.00 90859 7/24/2009 Malcolm smith motorsports corp. 99743005 99755919 Mounting panel Install front & rear tire 024-3100-431.33-50 024-3100-431.33-50 7.87 402.97 410.84 90860 7/24/2009 Michael brandman associates, inc. 00047006 Prof srvcs 4/25-5/29/09 065-0000-201.08-55 300.00 300.00 90861 7/24/2009 Michael martinez REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 58.26 58.26 90862 7/24/2009 Micro mobile tire company, inc. 27772 Tires unit # 418 010-4150-410.33-50 504.60 504.60 90863 7/24/2009 Monaghan communications 115 le magazine full page ad 096-1700-417.30-90 750.00 750.00 90864 7/24/2009 Montezuma limited partnership REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 129.66 129.66 90865 7/24/2009 Mpsn properties, Ip REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 60.44 60.44 90866 7/24/2009 Msm financial inc REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 137.69 137.69 90869 7/24/2009 Nextel communications REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc 010-1100-411.35-17 010-1200-412.35-17 010-1400-414.35-17 011-1700-417.35-17 010-2500-425.35-17 010-3100-431.35-17 011-3300-431.35-17 010-3320-431.35-17 010-4140-410.35-17 010-4150-410.35-17 010-4200-410.35-17 010-7100-410.35-17 010-7101-410.35-17 288.60 90.18 93.76 13.67 24.30 30.78 105.67 41.90 100.55 204.79 73.93 183.26 27.33 2,055.36 Page 22 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90869... 7/24/2009... Nextel communications... REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc Blkberry/cell phone srvc 034-3100-431.35-17 050-1400-414.35-17 050-4200-410.35-17 050-9000-450.35-17 055-1400-414.35-17 055-4170-450.35-17 055-4200-410.35-17 056-4150-410.35-17 057-4150-410.35-17 059-1400-414.35-17 059-4200-410.35-17 096-1200-412.35-17 096-1400-414.35-17 096-1700-417.35-17 096-3320-431.35-17 099-1200-412.35-17 102-1400-500.35-17 010-2500-425.35-17 30.79 26.35 8.63 257.79 9.95 111.11 8.62 13.67 27.33 12.69 8.62 75.77 14.44 5.47 28.23 50.51 86.59 0.08 2,055.36... 90870 7/24/2009 Oak tree realty group REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 163.97 163.97 90871 7/24/2009 Office depot 479802184001 479802184001 479802184001 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 050-1400-414.21-10 059-1400-414.21-10 055-1400-414.21-10 7.58 7.57 7.58 22.73 90872 7/24/2009 Overnight industrial 46097 46194 46203 46234 46430 Gloves Mulitfold paper towels Tarps, brush, pole set Toilet tissue, towels Styrofoam cups, toil tiss 010-4150-410.21-35 010-2500-425.21-10 055-4170-450.21-12 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 14.25 33.71 94.71 87.98 102.01 332.66 90873 7/24/2009 Pacific shores construction inc. 7655 Mow, edge, weed planters 105-3320-431.34-05 455.00 455.00 90874 7/24/2009 Paetec communications, inc. 51666059 Telephone service 010-3100-431.35-16 1,041.90 2,152.88 Page 23 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90874... 7/24/2009... Paetec communications, inc.... 51683339 Telephone service 010-2500-425.35-16 1,110.98 2,152.88... 90875 7/24/2009 Papa REQUEST 070809 Regist fee/qual appl cert 010-4150-410.31-20 70.00 70.00 90876 7/24/2009 Paso robles tank,inc. 041516 041516 Services on bath tank #2 10% retention withheld 199-9999-425.40-01 199-0000-210.20-25 7,000.00 -700.00 6,300.00 90877 7/24/2009 Perma 070109 070109 070109 Property prog ins premium Gen liab deposit premium Work comp 1st qrt deposit 020-2200-419.37-05 020-0000-103.12-39 018-0000-103.12-39 32,920.26 127,890.00 27,974.00 188,784.26 90879 7/24/2009 Pierce plumbing, inc. 37222 37222 37223 37227 37227 37229 37215 37215 37369 37230 37230 37432 37375 37376 37385 37385 37377 37377 37384 37387 Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies Plumbing & misc supplies 096-9700-470.30-90 010-7100-410.21-12 050-9000-450.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7101-410.21-12 096-9700-470.30-90 010-4140-410.21-12 010-4150-410.21-12 050-9000-450.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7101-410.21-12 050-9000-450.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7100-410.21-12 010-7101-410.21-12 010-4150-410.21-12 056-4150-410.33-50 050-9000-450.21-12 010-7101-410.21-12 43.00 13.68 82.95 20.21 13.00 63.85 5.00 39.94 52.18 75.00 16.27 45.39 39.95 85.01 28.59 40.00 18.71 6.00 81.82 9.78 780.33 90880 7/24/2009 Pip printing 107221 107273 24 x 36 prints 24 x 36 sewer maps 050-9000-450.36-10 050-9000-450.36-10 3.52 2.35 5.87 Page 24 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90881 7/24/2009 Powerhouse gym 1107 Employee gym facility 085-0000-202.21-76 600.00 600.00 90882 7/24/2009 Pre -paid legal services, inc. REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 071609 Additional/june 2009 July 2009 085-0000-202.21-87 085-0000-202.21-87 7.48 40.86 48.34 90883 7/24/2009 Preferred realtor association REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 139.72 139.72 90884 7/24/2009 Press enterprise 56483492 Advertising 105-3320-431.34-05 448.80 448.80 90885 7/24/2009 Preston wallace ii REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 67.74 67.74 90886 7/24/2009 Probity automotive specialists,inc. 255 272 Work performed/volunt veh Work performed chev silva 010-3100-431.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 53.26 1,344.35 1,397.61 90887 7/24/2009 Professional communications net 082000607 Live answering service 010-3100-431.34-05 278.50 278.50 90888 7/24/2009 Quill corporation 7690010 7690010 7690010 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 102-1400-500.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-1400-414.21-10 95.89 78.08 191.81 365.78 90889 7/24/2009 Ramsey backflow & plumbing 44946 Tested backflow device 050-9000-450.34-05 40.00 40.00 90890 7/24/2009 Realpro REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 77.77 77.77 90891 7/24/2009 Reliable office supplies, inc. BL672300 BL672300 BL672300 BL716700 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 011-3300-431.21-10 010-3320-431.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 112.01 112.01 92.78 164.19 480.99 90892 7/24/2009 Reliable office supplies, inc. BMC61300 BMC61301 Office supplies Office supplies 010-4200-410.21-10 010-4200-410.21-10 9.42 64.13 73.55 90893 7/24/2009 Reliable office supplies, inc. BLX00700 Office supplies 010-2500-425.21-10 186.01 186.01 90894 7/24/2009 Rightway 661485 661695 Restrm facilities/ july 4 Srvc labor 7/7-8/3/09 010-2510-425.40-04 010-3100-431.34-50 394.38 70.88 465.26 90895 7/24/2009 Riverside county community health 062509 Animal cntrl srvcs may 09 010-3320-431.34-05. 16,945.35 16,945.35 90896 7/24/2009 Riverside county department of IN0065215 IN0065215 IN0065215 IN0065215 Environ health permit Environ health permit Environ health permit Environ health permit 010-4150-410.30-90 010-7100-410.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 055-4170-450.30-90 172.00 172.00 172.00 172.00 1,376.00 Page 25 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90896... 7/24/2009... Riverside county department of... IN0064845 Environ health permit 010-8400-425.34-05 688.00 1,376.00... 90897 7/24/2009 Riverside county sheriff departmer SH0000011938 SH0000011938 SH0000011938 SH0000011938 Contract law 4/23-5/20/09 Contract law 4/23-5/20/09 Contract law 4/23-5/20/09 Contract law 4/23-5/20/09 010-3100-431.34-04 010-3100-431.34-04 034-3100-431.34-04 010-3100-431.34-04 474,455.98 6,871.56 72,273.60 11,874.08 565,475.22 90898 7/24/2009 Riverside, county of P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 P00000001735 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 010-4200-410.21-70 010-7101-410.21-70 010-7100-410.21-70 010-4150-410.21-70 010-4140-410.21-70 050-9000-450.21-70 055-4170-450.21-70 010-1200-412.21-70 011-1700-417.21-70 011-3300-431.21-70 010-3320-431.21-70 010-2500-425.21-70 010-3100-431.21-70 107.95 279.70 1,004.64 553.74 494.47 745.58 482.44 125.67 114.50 101.43 426.62 21.83 317.14 4,775.71 90899 7/24/2009 Riverside, county of REQUEST 072109 Notice of exempt fee 011-0000-308.06-01 64.00 64.00 90900 7/24/2009 Riverside, county of AC0000000606 Lafco fees & admin fees 010-2500-425.31-25 3,003.14 3,003.14 90901 7/24/2009 Roseen builders REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 379.89 379.89 90902 7/24/2009 San diego realty inc REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 129.62 129.62 90903 7/24/2009 San jacinto chamber of commerce 245 Mbmrship invest 8/09-8/10 010-2500-425.31-25 420.00 420.00 90904 7/24/2009 Schweitzer appraisals, inc. 63009-ANAYA 63009-HOPPER-PC L. anaya/ 1st draw reqst L.hopper-porter 1st draw 199-9999-425.40-01 199-9999-425.40-01 300.00 300.00 600.00 90905 7/24/2009 Seiu local 721 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 071609 Add'I dues for june 2009 Dues for July 2009 085-0000-202.21-43 085-0000-202.21-43 13.25 868.90 882.15 90906 7/24/2009 Shred it 050325928 Shredding service 010-3100-431.34-05 109.35 109.35 90907 7/24/2009 Sonya feigen REQUEST 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 2.09 2.09 Page 26 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90908 7/24/2009 South coast a.q.m.d. 2073638 2074899 Flat fee emissions fy0809 Permit for elec generator 010-3200-431.33-10 010-3200-431.33-10 109.00 293.21 402.21 90909 7/24/2009 Southern california association of 0900-271 Mbmrship dues fy 09/10 010-2500-425.31-25 3,003.00 3,003.00 90918 7/24/2009 Southern california edison REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service 010-3200-431.35-14 010-4150-410.35-14 010-4200-410.35-14 010-6100-425.35-14 010-6500-425.35-14 025-7100-410.35-14 025-7250-410.35-14 025-7252-410.35-14 025-7260-410.35-14 050-9000-450.35-14 301-8831-500.35-14 302-8831-500.35-14 303-8831-500.35-14 304-8831-500.35-14 309-8831-500.35-14 313-8831-500.35-14 316-8831-500.35-14 317-8831-500.35-14 320-8831-500.35-14 325-8831-500.35-14 326-8831-500.35-14 327-8831-500.35-14 331-8831-500.35-14 332-8831-500.35-14 339-8831-500.35-14 342-8831-500.35-14 32.76 167.52 60.87 272.95 21.71 22.89 203.05 1.86 14,671.01 352.79 21.56 20.48 38.40 45.28 42.72 39.04 21.12 20.48 39.04 37.29 155.35 43.86 94.97 58.88 17.92 32.68 49,623.68 Page 27 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90918... 7/24/2009... Southern california edison... REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service 345-8831-500.35-14 362-8831-500.35-14 376-8831-500.35-14 309-8831-500.35-14 301-8831-500.35-14 304-8831-500.35-14 317-8831-500.35-14 359-8831-500.35-14 332-8831-500.35-14 010-4150-410.35-14 010-4150-410.35-14 010-4150-410.35-14 025-7260-410.35-14 025-7260-410.35-14 301-8831-500.35-14 303-8831-500.35-14 306-8831-500.35-14 307-8831-500.35-14 308-8831-500.35-14 309-8831-500.35-14 310-8831-500.35-14 312-8831-500.35-14 313-8831-500.35-14 315-8831-500.35-14 316-8831-500.35-14 320-8831-500.35-14 321-8831-500.35-14 322-8831-500.35-14 323-8831-500.35-14 566.38 88.58 25.15 108.00 789.73 123.43 86.43 132.79 42.16 2,107.03 0.03 174.59 28.14 41.03 8.05 253.38 235.77 777.01 736.16 608.44 381.19 36.86 464.76 19.46 49.30 534.08 240.86 435.89 290.11 49,623.68... Page 28 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90918... 7/24/2009... Southern california edison... REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service 324-8831-500.35-14 325-8831-500.35-14 326-8831-500.35-14 329-8831-500.35-14 331-8831-500.35-14 332-8831-500.35-14 333-8831-500.35-14 334-8831-500.35-14 335-8831-500.35-14 336-8831-500.35-14 337-8831-500.35-14 338-8831-500.35-14 339-8831-500.35-14 342-8831-500.35-14 345-8831-500.35-14 351-8831-500.35-14 352-8831-500.35-14 354-8831-500.35-14 359-8831-500.35-14 362-8831-500.35-14 367-8831-500.35-14 371-8831-500.35-14 373-8831-500.35-14 375-8831-500.35-14 301-8831-500.35-14 315-8831-500.35-14 334-8831-500.35-14 335-8831-500.35-14 336-8831-500.35-14 36.86 529.84 1,072.35 598.42 201.89 618.12 67.91 0.59 79.28 18.63 155.86 161.88 128.44 10.04 954.87 84.61 6.18 3.08 8.05 301.96 3.22 3.08 3.08 25.88 14.34 5.75 0.66 0.75 0.87 49,623.68... Page 29 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90918... 7/24/2009... Southern california edison... REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service 337-8831-500.35-14 339-8831-500.35-14 342-8831-500.35-14 345-8831-500.35-14 346-8831-500.35-14 351-8831-500.35-14 354-8831-500.35-14 359-8831-500.35-14 371-8831-500.35-14 373-8831-500.35-14 374-8831-500.35-14 010-3200-431.35-14 025-7260-410.35-14 050-9000-450.35-14 055-4170-450.35-14 301-8831-500.35-14 305-8831-500.35-14 307-8831-500.35-14 329-8831-500.35-14 338-8831-500.35-14 010-4150-410.35-14 309-8831-500.35-14 319-8832-500.35-14 360-8831-500.35-14 309-8831-500.35-14 319-8832-500.35-14 360-8831-500.35-14 0.48 0.95 0.37 5.24 5.24 13.86 5.75 14.34 5.75 5.75 4.56 1,044.64 21.12 16,903.52 46.23 42.24 42.24 44.30 19.84 113.37 230.18 3.75 4.12 7.95 3.87 5.53 10.73 49,623.68... 90919 7/24/2009 Sps var, I.I.c. 10067 10067 Cashiering recpt printers Cashiering recpt printers 050-1400-414.40-45 055-1400-414.40-45 526.42 526.42 1,579.25 Page 30 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90919... 7/24/2009... Sps var, I.I.c.... 10067 Cashiering recpt printers 059-1400-414.40-45 526.41 1,579.25... 90920 7/24/2009 Staples credit plan - ch 9252724001 Camera bag 102-1400-500.21-10 13.53 13.53 90921 7/24/2009 Star auto parts 51749 53878 52375 52922 53614 Hd aw68 hydraulic/#478 Hub ring Protectant 16 oz 10w-30 # 411 Scott towels 056-4150-410.33-50 010-3200-431.33-50 050-9000-450.21-12 010-4150-410.33-50 050-9000-450.21-12 63.06 32.63 8.58 4.11 16.85 125.23 90922 7/24/2009 State of california dept of justice 741976 Blood alcohol anyls 5/09 010-3100-431.34-05 70.00 70.00 90923 7/24/2009 Stater bros 1800704 1210706 Bottled water Bottled water, sandwiches 010-2510-425.40-04 011-1700-417.31-20 68.63 37.96 106.59 90924 7/24/2009 Steno solutions, inc. 41829 1 report for june 2009 010-3100-431.34-05 48.44 48.44 90925 7/24/2009 Stetson engineers inc. 18521 Prof srvcs for may 2009 050-9000-450.30-90 3,423.36 3,423.36 90926 7/24/2009 Subbarayan krishnan, m.d. WICMA00 2784 Dmv cpe 010-1210-412.30-90 67.00 67.00 90927 7/24/2009 Sungard public sector, inc. 894013 Asp maintenance aug 2009 010-1400-414.34-05 3,768.00 3,768.00 90928 7/24/2009 Superior ready mix concrete 339507 339507 340772 520-c-2500 r.c.t.d. appr 520-c-2500 r.c.t.d. appr 20 x 100 clear 6 mil 063-1700-410.40-01 010-4150-410.21-12 010-4150-410.21-80 851.84 99.99 133.22 1,085.05 90929 7/24/2009 T.y.lin international,inc. 0905207 Prof srvcs 2/12-5/29/09 199-9999-425.40-01 6,659.50 6,659.50 90930 7/24/2009 Talley metal fabrication 13708 Replace safety loop 010-3200-431.33-10 210.00 210.00 90931 7/24/2009 Teserra, inc. 30778 REVISED 30778 REVISED Contracted services 10% retention withheld 199-9999-425.40-01 199-0000-210.20-25 269,795.10 -26,979.51 242,815.59 90932 7/24/2009 The balarezo group REQUEST 063009 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 9.95 9.95 90933 7/24/2009 The hartford-priority accounts 4403301-7 Lf,ad&d,std,ltd.og1861613 085-0000-202.21-46 2,691.88 2,691.88 90934 7/24/2009 Time warner cable 070909 070209 Ds1 and cable service Ds1 and cable service 010-7400-425.35-16 010-3100-431.34-05 276.81 95.35 372.16 90935 7/24/2009 Trans union Ilc 05940972 05940972 05940972 Customer credit reports Customer credit reports Customer credit reports 050-1400-414.21-10 059-1400-414.21-10 055-1400-414.21-10 67.38 67.37 67.37 369.81 Page 31 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90935... 7/24/2009... Trans union Ilc... 06940308 06940308 06940308 Customer credit reports Customer credit reports Customer credit reports 050-1400-414.21-10 055-1400-414.21-10 059-1400-414.21-10 55.89 55.90 55.90 369.81... 90936 7/24/2009 Underground service alert 620090618 Tickets/june 2009 050-9000-450.34-05 100.50 100.50 90937 7/24/2009 Usa blue book 845011 1 /2" tube x 1/2" npt 050-9000-450.33-30 38.51 38.51 90938 7/24/2009 Valley diesel & truck repair 701 Work performed vac truck 010-4150-410.33-50 381.44 381.44 90939 7/24/2009 Valley wide recreation 063009 071509 Temp part time june 2009 2nd installment 010-7400-425.34-05 010-8400-425.34-05 2,517.12 4,833.34 7,350.46 90941 7/24/2009 Verizon california REQUEST 063000C REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 REQUEST 072009 Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service Telephone service 010-2500-425.35-16 010-2500-425.35-16 010-3100-431.35-16 010-3200-431.35-16 010-4200-410.35-16 010-6100-425.35-16 010-7100-410.35-16 010-7400-425.35-16 034-3100-431.35-16 050-9000-450.35-16 313-8831-500.35-10 320-8831-500.35-10 326-8831-500.35-10 322-8831-500.35-10 160.00 165.67 241.15 77.49 186.34 33.60 42.48 306.57 130.29 223.85 30.04 32.05 34.34 32.05 1,695.92 90942 7/24/2009 Verizon wireless 0771510223 Mobile telephone service 024-3100-431.35-17 231.57 231.57 90943 7/24/2009 Vista paint 2009-274694-00 2009-274694-00 2009-279925-00 Tip rack, gloves Tip rack, gloves Airless hose, tip rack 010-4150-410.21-35 010-4150-410.21-80 010-4150-410.21-80 9.83 40.00 116.70 166.53 90944 7/24/2009 Voyager fleet systems, inc. 869158709906 869158709906 869158709906 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 Fleet fuel may 2009 050-9000-450.21-70 010-4150-410.21-70 024-3100-431.21-70 397.97 546.97 336.34 1,281.28 Page 32 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 90945 7/24/2009 Warren watkins REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 12.14 12.14 90946 7/24/2009 Waxie sanitary supply 71375659 71375664 Misc supplies Misc supplies 010-3100-431.21-30 010-3100-431.33-50 577.93 173.60 751.53 90947 7/24/2009 Western riverside council 5570 Ccwc dues fy 07/08 059-8052-450.30-90 8,256.00 8,256.00 90948 7/24/2009 William lenocker REQUEST 070909 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 266.19 266.19 90949 7/24/2009 William rice REQUEST 063009 Water deposit refund 050-0000-229.08-70 125.62 125.62 90950 7/24/2009 Ww feed & supply 070409 20 straw bales/4th July 010-2510-425.40-04 151.16 151.16 90951 7/24/2009 Xerox corporation 041577764 Lease June 2009 010-4200-410.34-05 674.34 674.34 90952 7/24/2009 Yoko yang 071609 Credit balance refund 050-0000-308.09-10 54.47 54.47 90953 7/24/2009 Z best pizza 070209 Food and drinks 010-1100-411.31-20 31.53 31.53 90954 7/24/2009 Avi-con, inc. ca construction 4983 Replaces ck # 90760 199-0000-210.20-25 4,919.00 4,919.00 90956 7/24/2009 Avi-con, inc. ca construction 4983 Replaces ck # 90764 199-0000-210.20-25 13,799.19 13,799.19 90957 7/24/2009 Ayres, jim 070409 Reimburse for candy 010-2510-425.40-04 140.66 140.66 90959 7/27/2009 Confidential reward payee REQUEST 062909 Graffiti reward 2nd/final 031-3100-431.36-05 250.00 250.00 90960 7/29/2009 Alma santoyo REQUEST 072709 Return key deposit 065-0000-229.00-00 250.00 250.00 90962 7/30/2009 Eastern municipal water district REQUEST 072909 REQUEST 072909 REQUEST 072909 REQUEST 072909 Water service Water service Water service Water service 025-7100-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 301-8831-500.35-10 305-8831-500.35-10 2,385.46 2,135.77 4,388.93 27.30 8,937.46 90963 7/30/2009 Southern california edison REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 REQUEST 063009 Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service Electricity service 010-2500-425.35-14 010-4200-410.35-14 025-7260-410.35-14 341-8831-500.35-14 2,426.10 19.55 50.32 37.41 2,533.38 90964 7/30/2009 Gas company,the REQUEST 072909 REQUEST 072909 REQUEST 072909 REQUEST 072909 REQUEST 072909 Gas service Gas service Gas service Gas service Gas service 010-7400-425.35-12 010-6500-425.35-12 010-3100-431.35-12 010-3200-431.35-12 010-2500-425.35-12 76.24 4.93 14.45 38.30 9.86 143.78 Page 33 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register 07/31/2009 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total Total Checks 3,508,417.42 Page 34 CITY OF SAN JACINTO ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER REPORT JULY 1 - 31, 2009 DATE FROM TO AMOUNT REASON 07/07/2009 General Checking Union Bank 183,420.21 Soboba Springs Project Area Debt Payment 07/24/2009 General Checking Neopost 2,000.00 Postage 07/27/2009 General Checking Union Bank 395,388.10 RDA Tax Allocation Bonds 2005 Debt Payment 580,808.31 AGENDA ITEM A . 6 September 3, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bernard Simon, City Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report at July 31, 2009 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Treasurer's Report for July 31, 2009. BACKGROUND: The Treasurer's Report is required to be presented to the governing body at least quarterly in accordance with California Government Code Section 53600 et. seq. DISCUSSION: Total Cash and City Investments decreased 4.22% during the month. This includes cash, cash in bank and cash with trustee. The attached Treasurer's report is a "snapshot" report of our cash position on the last day of the month in all of our accounts. A section demonstrating compliance with the adopted Investment Policy and a chart depicting historical interest rates for certain positions is also included. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Treasurer's Report for the month ending July 31, 2009. Page 1 TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING JULY 31, 2009 06/30/2009 07/31/2009 % change 07/31/2009 COMPUTED INVESTMENT INSTITUTION INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PREV. MONTH CURRENT from prior MARKET ACCRUED TYPE SERIAL # RATE YIELD DATE DATE BALANCE BALANCE month VALUE INTEREST STATE POOL L.A.I.F. 1.314% 1.322% Various Open $39,803,985 D $38,953,588 -2.14% $38,997,957 $44,369 STATE POOL L.A.I.F. - RDA 1.314% 1.322% Various Open $8,585,767 D $8,612,360 0.31% $8,621,958 $9,598 CAMP Joint Powers Authority 0.440% 0.441% Various Open $785,788 E $251,054-68.05% $251,054 n/a MONEY MARKET Bank of Hemet 1.150% 1.156% Various Open $12,396,186 C $11,058,895 -10.79% $11,058,895 n/a DEMAND Account Bank of Hemet 0.000% 0.000% Various Open $1,121,623 F $465,794-58.47% $465,794 n/a PAYROLL Account Bank of Hemet 0.000% 0.000% Various Open $113,854 F $27,822-75.56% $27,822 n/a Cash in EOC Lockbox 0.000% 0.000% Various n/a $5,000 F $5,000 0.00% $5,000 n/a Cash on Hand 0.000% 0.000% Various n/a $850 F $850 0.00% $850 n/a TOTAL CITY INVESTMENTS & FUNDS $62,813,053 RESTRICTED CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT (BOND FUNDS) Trustee $59,375,363-5.47% $59,429,330 $53,967 CFD NO 2 Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5201 0.000% 0.000% Various Open $0 B $0 0.00% $0 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5202 0.000% 0.000% Various Open $0 B $0 0.00% $0 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5203 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $127 B $127 0.00% $127 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5204 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $14,996 B $14,996 0.00% $14,996 n/a Corporate Obligations Union Bank Bayerische Lankbk GIC XXXXXX5204 4.050% 4.126% 10/10/2002 09/01/2014 $748,800 A $748,800 0.00% $748,800 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XX00XX5205 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $36,698 B $36,698 0.00% $36,698 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5208 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $266 B $266 0.00% $266 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5301 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $224 B $224 0.00% $224 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5401 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $582,003 B $585,766 0.65% $585,766 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5403 0.070% 0.070% Various Open $28 B $28 0.00% $28 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5405 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $187,663 B $187,663 0.00% $187,663 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5406 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $29,237 B $26,023 -10.99% $26,023 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund X00XXX5501 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $939 B $939 0.00% $939 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXX0X5502 0.000% 0.000% Various Open $0 B $0 0.00% $0 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund X00XXX5503 0.000% 0.000% Various Open $0 B $0 0.00% $0 n/a Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXXXX5506 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $24,171 B $24,171 0.00% $24,171 n/a TOTAL CFD NO 2 $1,625,152 $1,625,701 0.03% $1,625,701 n/a 2005 RDA SAN JACINTO TAX ALLOCATION BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXX75750X 0.079% 0.079% Various Open $3,057,565 B $3,452,953 12.93% $3,452,953 n/a 1997 WATER IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXX59800X 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $234,967 B $234,967 0.00% $234,967 n/a 2002 WATER REVENUE BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXX68290X 0.000% 0.000% Various Open $1 B $1 0.00% $1 n/a Prepared By: General Accounting Manager 08/21/2009 Page 2 TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING JULY 31, 2009 06/30/2009 07/31/2009 % change 07/31/2009 COMPUTED INVESTMENT INSTITUTION INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PREY. MONTH CURRENT from prior MARKET ACCRUED TYPE SERIAL # RATE YIELD DATE DATE BALANCE BALANCE month VALUE INTEREST 1999 RDA SOBOBA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXX62740X 0.060% 0.060% Various Open $62,447 B $245,868 293.72% $245,868 n/a TOTAL CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT $4,980,132 $5,559,490 11.63 % $5,559,490 n/a TOTAL ALL FUNDS $67,793,185 $64,934,853 -4.22% $64,988,820 $53,967 PER INVESTMENT POLICY: Maximum % Current % In Compliance? Level 1 - Investments U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes and Bonds 100% 0% Yes $0 Negotiable CDs 10% 0% Yes $0 Obligations issued by U.S. Government Agencies 100% 0% Yes $0 Commecial Paper 15°/ 1% Yes A $748,800 Medium Term Notes 20°/ 0% Yes $0 Repurchase Agreements 10% 0% Yes $0 Time Deposits 25% 0% Yes $0 Mutual Funds (Limited to U.S. Treasuries) 18% 7% Yes B $4,810,690 Mutual Funds (Limited to U.S. Govt. Sec.) 18% 0% Yes $0 Level 2 - Investments Money Market Funds (non -brokered) 20% 17% Yes C $11,058,895 LAIF 90% 73% Yes D $47,565,948 CAMP (pool account) 50% 0% Yes E $251,054 Cash & Demand Accounts n/a n/a n/a F $499,466 $64,934,853 I CERTIFY THAT THESE INVESTMENTS COMPLY WITH ALL STATE LAWS PERTAINING TO THE INVESTMENT OF LOCAL AGENCY FUNDS AND THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO'S INVESTMENT POLICIES. CITY OF SAN JACINTO MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SIX MONTH CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS AS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 53646(b)(3). BERNARD SIMON, TREASURER City of San Jacinto Prepared By: General Accounting Manager 08/21/2009 b O O 8/06 9/06 10/06 11/06 12/06 1/07 2/07 3/07 4/07 5/07 6/07 7/07 8/07 9/07 10/07 11/07 12/07 1 /08 2/08 3/08 4/08 5/08 6/08 7/08 8/08 9/08 10/08 11 /08 12/08 1 /09 2/09 3/09 4/09 5/09 6/09 7/09 N O O O W b O O .p b O O 01 b O O rn O O O 60/L 01 90/9 - sales lsaaa}ui TO: • AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM ilp1„-77.;) , City Clerk 3N 7 -7/ Enclosure: Staff Report for meeting of [CC or RDA] (date) (name — brief description) Consent Calendar Item Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) City Departments Item Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. B. C. Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting DATE: [Name or Initials], [Title] S:\City Clerk\CC RPT 06\AGENDA Transmittal Faiin.doc AGENDA ITEM A September 3, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tim Hults, Assistant City Manager" SUBJECT: Request to appropriate Government Facilities DIF monies in the amount of $30,000 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, appropriate $30,000 from the Government Facilities DIF account to upgrade the HVAC systems at City Hall and to provide a source of funds for additional miscellaneous upgrades at City Hall and the Corporate Yard should the need arise. SUMMARY: The Government Services Facilities Element within the City's DIF program includes those facilities that provide for basic governmental services and public facilities maintenance, exclusive of public safety. City Hall and the City's corporate yard were identified on the needs list within the 2005 DIF program. Both residential and non-residential development are assessed a fee for the acquisition of facilities to provide general government and public maintenance services of city facilities. DISCUSSION: Since acquiring and moving into the City Hall buildings in January 2008, the HVAC units have not provided adequate cooling. It is likely that the reason for this is that the energy calculations provided as a part of the plan check for the building were for more of an open office building. Since acquiring the complex, a number of walls and offices were added that resulted in inefficiencies with regard to the return air system and register flow levels. As a result, staff contacted an HVAC consultant for a study. The study determined that two additional HVAC units or heat pumps should be installed, one in the finance building to serve the conference room and the offices of the finance director and city clerk and a second in the main building to serve the building inspection/code enforcement area. In addition, staff had the HVAC consultant investigate the viability of the HVAC units at the Virginia Lee and two can be salvaged for this purpose. The estimated cost to relocate two units from the Virginia Lee, install them and the associated duct work, return air vents and registers is $10,000. Approvals City Manager: `C Page 1 of 2 Finance Director:N..... ALTERNATIVES: 1) Staff recommends that the City Council appropriate $30,000 from the Government Facilities DIF account. 2) Continue this action and direct staff further; 3) Deny the request. FISCAL IMPACT: There is an estimated amount of $35,000 in the Government Facilities DIF account. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 2 of 2 AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Rick Miller, Deputy City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for City Council meeting of September 3, 2009 2009 Downtown Pavement Rehabilitation Project (name — brief description) X Consent Calendar Item Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) City Departments Item _ Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. Exhibits B. C. Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Records/copies of staff report/resolution will be maintained for grant funding requirements Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting: DATE: August 25, 2009 Habib Motlagh, City Engineer [Name or Initials], [Title] C:\Documents and Settings\Rmiller\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK98\2009 Downtown Pavement Rehab Transmittal.doc AGENDA ITEM 3A . September 3, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer SUBJECT: 2009 Downtown Pavement Rehabilitation Project (CIP 09-012), authorization to advertise for bids RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve the plans and specifications for the 2009 Downtown Pavement Rehabilitation and direct the City Clerk to publicly advertise for bids. DISCUSSION: The adopted 2009-10 budget for capital improvements projects includes project 09-012, entitled "2009 Downtown Pavement Rehab". This will continue the city's ongoing efforts to improve deteriorated pavements downtown — previous rehab projects were built in 2005 and 2007. Attached to this report, please find an exhibit showing the areas that are to be repaved as part of this project. The work consists entirely of grind & overlay type repairs, with a few areas also having some curb & gutter construction. The preliminary schedule for this project is as follows: • September 2009: Bid authorization, advertisement • October 2009: Open bids, award contract • November 2009 — January 2010: Construction In addition to work in the downtown area, the City Engineer's office has prepared plans for minor widening and sidewalk construction on Commonwealth Avenue between Girard and Hewitt. Sidewalk will be built on the south side of the road, providing pedestrian connectivity between the Rancho San Jacinto area and the Wal-Mart retail center. Approvals City Manager: &-P Finance Director: N_.. Page 1 of 2 There are several locations around town where speed hump requests have been approved, and construction of these items will also take place within this contract. Streets to receive speed humps are Quandt Ranch Rd, Westminster Drive, and Sussex Drive. There is also an item on the current Council agenda considering speed humps on Beringer, which would also be added to this contract if approved. The City Engineer's office has completed preparation of the plans and specifications, and the project is now ready to advertise for bids from contractors. ALTERNATIVES: Approval: Approve the plans and specifications and direct staff to proceed with advertisement. Denial: Do not approve this item as presented, and provide staff with further direction. FISCAL IMPACT: The available funding for the downtown rehab is approximately $510,000 per the approved 2009-10 budget. The funding source is Prop 1 B Local Streets and Roads money from the state. Staff proposes that the work on Commonwealth be funded using available SB 821 funding and the money left over from construction of the De Anza Drive improvement project, which was recently completed. The speed humps will be built using funds from a separate project, namely project #02-019, "Traffic Control Devices". There are adequate funds available in this project for the speed hump construction. Upon opening of bids, the City Engineer's office will review the available budget and make any necessary recommendations for fully funding construction. No budget action is requested at this time. ATTACHMENTS: ® Exhibit with locations of 2009 Downtown Pavement Rehabilitation Page 2 of 2 FIFTH STREET / / / SEVENTH STREET aTal. III 2009 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION SCHEDULE I COMMONWEALTH AVENUE WALL MART - COMMONWEALTH AVENUE A VEMENT & SIDEWALK IM --SCHEDULE -IL THIRD STREET VEMENTS QUANDT RANCH RD �5 w i 0 v QUANDT RANCH RD. w o O A WIN L. BLUE RIDGE LN m w w 3ERINGER DR GIs WASHINGTON AVE PREEtvfARK CT v RAMONA EXPRESSWAY , USSEX .GOAD & WESTMINSTER DR. LEGEND I SPEED HUMP SPEED HUMPS SCHEDULE III ll mWASHINGTON AVE s o, Ct w CD z w. IN CT AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Rick Miller, Deputy City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for City Council meeting of September 3, 2009 Speed Hump Installation — Beringer Drive (name — brief description) X Consent Calendar Item Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) City Departments Item Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. Petition B. Exhibit C. Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Records/copies of staff report/resolution will be maintained for grant funding requirements Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting: DATE: August 25, 2009 Habib Motlagh, City Engineer [Name or Initials], [Title] C:\Documents and Settings\Rmiller\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK98\Beringer Drive Speed Hump Transmittal.doc AGENDA ITEM A.9 September 3, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer SUBJECT: Speed Hump Installations, Beringer Drive RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve and authorize the installation of speed humps on Beringer Drive, as requested by residents in a recent petition. DISCUSSION: Recently, the City Engineer's office received a petition for speed humps on Buckingham Drive, between Washington Ave (west) and Washington Ave (east). Residents in 57 of the 79 homes along Buckingham petitioned for speed humps. The street has been reviewed by staff, and meets all requirements for speed hump installation. It is anticipated that these speed humps can be added to an upcoming capital project that includes paving work, such as the 2009 Downtown Pavement Rehab project. ALTERNATIVES: Approval: Approve the installation of speed humps as recommended and direct staff to proceed. Disapproval: Disapprove the speed hump construction and direct staff to inform the petitioner of the decision. City Manager: Finance Director: 0/9....• Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: The unit price per speed humps is estimated to be $3,000, and there would be six or seven on Beringer. Thus, the total anticipated cost is $18,000-21,000. After completion of this and previously approved speed humps at 4 different sites, we estimate a balance of $100,000 in CIP 02-019, "Traffic Control Devices/Studies", therefore adequate funding for this work exists in this capital project. ATTACHMENTS: Petition from residents of Beringer Drive Page 2 of 2 Petition for Speed Slumps for East Beringer Drive in San Jacinto We the residents of east Beringer Drive request speed slumps between Mouton Avenue and Washington Avenue for the following reasons: 1) Two accidents involving speeding cars hitting parked cars. 2) One car speeding and not being able to make turn, driving up on a front yard at the corner of Trinity Way and east Beringer Drive. 3) Cars slamming on breaks on while cars trying to exit driveway. 4) Blind corners around turn between Napa Court and Calona Place. We hope we would have some input on the placement of these speed slumps since we know where the cars pick up speed. Petition for Speed Slumps for East Beringer Drive in San Jacinto We the residents of east Beringer Drive request speed slumps between Mouton Avenue and Washington Avenue for the following reasons: 1) Two accidents involving speeding cars hitting parked cars. 2) One car speeding and not being able to make turn, driving up on a front yard at the corner of Trinity Way and east Beringer Drive. 3) Cars slamming on breaks on while cars trying to exit driveway. 4) Blind corners around turn between Napa Court and Calona Place. We hope we would have some input on the placement of these speed slumps since we know where the cars pick up speed. Petition for Speed Slumps for East Beringer Drive in San Jacinto We the residents of east Beringer Drive request speed slumps between Mouton Avenue and Washington Avenue for the following reasons: 1) Two accidents involving speeding cars hitting parked cars. 2) One car speeding and not being able to make tum, driving up on a front yard at the corner of Trinity Way and east Beringer Drive. 3) Cars slamming on breaks on while cars trying to exit driveway. 4) Blind corners around turn between Napa Court and Calorie Place. We hope we would have some input on the placement of these speed slumps since we know where the cars pick up speed. Petition for Speed Stumps for East Beringer Drive in San Jacinto We the residents of Beringer Drive request speed slumps between Mouton Avenue and Washington Avenue for the following reasons: 1) Two accidents involving speeding cars hitting parked cars. 2) One car speeding and not being able to make turn, driving up on a front yard at the corner of Trinity Way and east Beringer Drive. 3) Cars slamming on breaks on while cars trying to exit driveway. 4) Blind corners around turn between Napa Court and Calorie Place, We hope we would have some input on the placement of these speed slumps since we know where the cars pick up speed. LuCT-L, AlikCM 1; Petition for Speed Slumps for East Beringer Drive in San Jacinto We the residents of Beringer Drive request speed slumps between Mouton Avenue and Washington Avenue for the following reasons: 1) Two accidents involving speeding cars hitting parked cars. 2) One car speeding and not being able to make tum, driving up on a front yard at the corner of Trinity Way and east Beringer Drive. 3) Cars slamming on breaks on while cars trying to exit driveway. 4) Blind corners around turn between Napa Court and CaIona Place. We hope we would have some input on the placement of these speed slumps since we know where the cars pick up speed. AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Rick Miller, Deputy City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for CC meeting of 09/03/09 3Ao [CC or RDA] (date) Business License Applicable to Rental Properties — Receive and File XX Consent Calendar Item Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) City Departments Item Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. None B. Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting DATE: 8/24/09 CJRE or Initials], [Title] \\SJFP01\Users\CRogers\A Director\A Finance Dtr\Council Reports\00 CC Transmittal Format.doc AGENDA ITEM 3A. IO September 3, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Connie Rogers -Elmore, Interim Finance Direct VIA: Wendy Welch, Accountant I SUBJECT: Business License Applicable to Rental Properties — Receive and File RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this informational item on the enforcement of Municipal Code Chapter 5.04 Business Licenses Generally and Municipal Code 5.08 Business Licenses Fees as they pertain to landlords of any rental property, business or personal. SUMMARY There have been well over 800 properties identified through utility billing as rental properties managed either by the property owner or through a property management service. It is expected that even more rental properties may be identified with the assistance of EMWD and LHWD. The landlords for these rental properties are conducting a business and as such are required by existing ordinances to possess a current City business license. While there are a few property owners and property management companies currently licensed, with the availability of this new data, business licenses can now be obtained from all those identified as renting properties in the City. BACKGROUND Municipal Code 5.04 Business Licenses Generally (5.04.030) includes the following definition: "Rental of property and accommodations" includes every person or company engaged in the business of renting, leasing, providing, exchanging or trading, without loss of ownership, any land, dwelling, building, structure or portion thereof for the purpose of occupancy, sleeping, lodging, boarding, or other use and accommodation. The license fee for the rental of properties is determined by ownership of the property. Agents acting for property owners are responsible for payment Page 1 of 2 Approvals City Manager: " x Finance Directs .,'Y of the license fee on rentals. Such rental and accommodation to include but not be limited to: 1. Business Property, Rental. Buildings or portions thereof used for any business, commercial or industrial purposes or land for any purpose; 2. Residential Property, Rental. Apartments, recreation vehicle parks, trailer parks, mobile home parks, 3. Accommodations, boardinghouse, hospital, hotel, inn, lodging house, motel, rest home, rooming house, sanitarium. Municipal Code 5.08 Business License Fees (5.08.120) sets the fee as follows: Category A -Rental Space Each apartment, business office, hotel, motel, storage building, mini - storage building, open area storage space, convalescent home, nursing home, hospital and business of a like nature or similar character: May require certificate of compliance. Minimum of $70.00 per year for the first four units, plus an additional $1.00 per year for each unit or space over four in number. DISCUSSION To fully and equitably enforce Business License Ordinances, all landlords as property owners and property management companies must pay the prescribed business license fee. FISCAL IMPACT Anticipated additional General Fund revenue from business licenses related to the rental of property and accommodations is $40,000 to $60,000 annually. Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM September 3, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of theCityCouncil FROM: Asher Hartel, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Temporary Conditional Use Permit 1-09 for a golf driving range on 12 acres with pole and net structures ranging from 60 feet to 125 feet in height at Soboba Springs Country Club, located at 1020 Soboba Road. Applicant: Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians 23906 Soboba Road San Jacinto, CA 92581 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that by motion the City Council: Set a public hearing for September 17, 2009 concerning this Temporary Conditional Use Permit (TCUP). BACKGROUND: City Staff has been working with representatives from the Soboba Springs Country Club to process an application to establish a golf driving range at the Country Club/Golf Course on Soboba Road. The County Club wishes to complete the facility in time for the upcoming Nationwide Tour golf tournament, scheduled for September 28 through October 4, 2009. To meet this schedule, a special Planning Commission public hearing was conducted on September 1, in order to bring the project to Council for initial consideration on September 3, 2009. Under the City's zoning ordinance, if the City Council does not ratify a conditional use permit, it is set for public hearing. In order to complete the required environmental review, City staff is recommending that the City Council not ratify the TCUP at this time, but instead set the matter for a noticed, public hearing on September 17, 2009. If approved at that time, the City can then issue the necessary building permit for the Soboba Tribe to complete the driving range so that it is operational for the Nationwide Tour tournament. Supplemental information on this project will be made available to the City Council immediately following the September 1, 2009 Planning Commission meeting. Approvals City Manager: Finance Director Page 1 of 1 AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Rick Miller, Deputy City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for CC meeting of 09/03/09 [CC or RDA] (date) Credit Card, Debit Card, and Electronic Check Payment Acceptance Consent Calendar Item Public hearing Item: Notice requires yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) XX City Departments Item Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. Paymentus Master Services Agreeement B. Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: _ Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting: Wendy Welch DATE: 8/27/09 CJRE itle] \\SJFP01\Users\CRogers\A Director\A Finance Dtr\Council Reports\00 CC Transmittal Format.doc AGENDA ITEM September 3, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Connie Rogers -Elmore, Interims .Flipance Direct VIA: Wendy Welch, Accountant I SUBJECT: Credit Card, Debit Card and Electronic Check Payment Acceptance RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve the implementation of accepting credit and debit cards and electronic checks as payment options for customers of the City of San Jacinto using the services of Paymentus and the transfer of convenience charges to the user. SUMMARY The initial benefit of alternative payment methods will be offered to utility customers, with plans to make the program available tor business license and permits. Acceptance of credit and debit cards and electronic checks as a method of payment would enable customers to initiate utility services via telephone, will reduce staff time spent on collections and other face-to-face interactions, as well as provide additional resources to customers who have had services disconnected due to non-payment. The convenience charges for accepting such payment methods will be passed on to the customer resulting in no fiscal impact. This added service will not only provide convenience and benefit to customers, but will reduce staff time spent cashiering, collecting funds, and other instances of face-to-face contact. Presently, an average of 59% of the city's approximate 4,500 utility customers comes into City Hall to make payments. BACKGROUND Currently, the City only accepts cash, checks, and money orders as methods of payment from its customers. Property owners living outside of the City have no means of paying deposits or reconnect charges for their tenants without coming into the City or using a delivery or postal service. Customers wno must make a deposit to start a new account or that have had their service disconnected for non-payment have often requested the use of credit cards in order to start service. Literally hundreds of utility customers have requested the ability to make payments online. Contractors and other citizens have also inquired about alternative payment options for permits and business licenses. Page 1 of 2 Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: DISCUSSION i o address customer needs and requests various alternative payment options have been researched. Paymentus can not only provide the desired payment methods but can also interface directly with the City's billing software to post payments to customer accounts. Paymentus options enable customers to make payments over the phone via an Interactive Voice Response Service (IVR) (available with bi-lingual options) or via the Internet through a link on the City's web site. A convenience fee (approximately $3.95 per transaction based on an average residential utility payment of $100.00) for processing of credit and debit cards and electronic check payments is billed separately to the customer/user at the point of transaction. While most credit card companies allow the entity accepting payments to pass convenience charges on to the customer at the point of sale, VISA does not. For this reason and for identity theft protection purposes, the City will not be accepting credit card payments at the counter. The customer will be able to make alternative payments over the phone or via the Internet with the convenience charge directly billed to them by Paymentus. Paymentus offered the cities of Azusa, Fairfield, and Porterville as clients. The basic Paymentus Master Services Agreement is attached and is subject to such modifications as are reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. ALTERNATIVES 1) Implement alternative payment options allowing convenience fees to be paid by the customer. 2) Implement alternative payment options with the City paying any convenience fees. 3) Do not implement alternative payment options. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the City to implement alternative payment methods with Paymentus providing that convenience fees are paid by the customer. There are no additional costs to the City or computer software/hardware needs in using the Paymentus service. ATTACHMENT Paymentus Master Services Agreement (subject to such modifications as are reviewed and approved by the City Attorney). Page 2 of 2 The Real -Time Pail Payment Company MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT Customer. Customer Address: Contact for Notices to Customer: Estimated Yearly Bills / Invoices: City of San Jacinto 595 S. San Jacinto Ave, Bldg. B Wendy Welch 72,000 This Master Services Agreement ("Master Agreement") is entered into as of the Effective Date below, by and between the Customer ("Customer") identified above and Paymentus Corporation, a Delaware Corporation ("Paymentus"). WHEREAS Paymentus desires to provide and the Client desires to receive certain services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Paymentus provides electronic bill payment services to utilities, municipalities, insurance and other businesses. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby covenant and agree as follows. This Agreement consists of this signature page, General Terms and Conditions, and the attachments ("Attachments") with schedules ("Schedules") listed below: Schedule A: Paymentus Service Fee Schedule This Agreement represents the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to its subject matter and supersedes all other written or oral agreements heretofore made by or on behalf of Paymentus or Customer with respect to the subject matter hereof and may be changed only by agreements in writing signed by the authorized representatives of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives Customer: Paymentus: By: By: Name: Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: The Real -Time Rift Payment Company GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1 Definitions: For the purposes of this Agreement, the following terms and words shall have the meaning ascribed to them, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. 1.1 "Agreement " or "Contract" shall refer to this Agreement, as amended from time to time, which shall constitute an authorization for the term of this contract for Paymentus to be the exclusive provider of services, stated herein, to the Customer 1.2 "User" shall mean the users of the Customer's services 1.3 "Effective Date" shall be the last date upon which the parties signed this Agreement. The Agreement will not be effective against any party until the said date 1.4 "Launch Date" shall be the date on which Customer launches this service to the Users 1.5 "Payment" shall mean Users to make payments for Customer's services or Customer's bills 1.6 "Payment Amount" shall mean the bill amount User wants to pay to the Customer. 1.7 "Services" shall indude the performance of the Services outlined in section 2 of this Agreement 1.8 "Paymentus Authorized Processor" shall mean a Paymentus authorized merchant account provider and payment processing gateway 1.9 "Reversed or Charged -back Transactions" shall mean cancelled transactions due to User error, or a User's challenge to Payment authenticity. 1.10 "Average Bill Amount' shall mean the total amount of Payments collected through Paymentus system in a given month divided by the number of the Payments for the same month. 2 Description of Services to be performed 2.1 Scope of Services Paymentus shall provide Users the opportunity to make Payments by Credit Cards and other payment methods as deemed necessary by Paymentus. Payments may be made by Interactive Telephone Voice Response System ("IVR") or secure Internet interface provided at the Paymentus Corporation's web site or other websites part of Paymentus' Instant Payment Network ("WebSites"), collectively referred to as the ("System"). Paymentus shall, on behalf of the Customer, collect and process Payments from Users using Visa, MasterCard or other credit cards ("hereinafter referred to as a "Card"). Paymentus may also offer other payment options such as eChecks or Debit Cards. 2.2 Professionalism Paymentus shall perform in a professional manner all Services required to be performed under this Agreement. 2 The Real -Time Bill Payment Company 3 Compensation 3.1 No Cost Installation Paymentus will charge no fcc3 related to the initial setup and personalization of its standard service for both Web and IVR interfaces. 3.2 Paymentus Service Fee System will charge each User a Service fee for each transaction processed (hereinafter called "Paymentus Service Fee"). Such Paymentus Service Fee is to be collected in addition to the corresponding Payment as part of the transaction. For each payment, the Paymentus Service Fee collected will be used to pay the corresponding Credit Card transaction fees or transaction fees associated with Debit Cards or eChecks (hereinafter called "Transaction Fees") except NSF fees and processing charges related to Paymentus (hereinafter called "Paymentus Fees"). A schedule of Paymentus Service Fee is attached hereto as Schedule A. Paymentus and Customer may mutually review Paymentus Service Fee schedule at regular intervals. However, Paymentus can amend this schedule upon prior written notice to the Customer, if such change is required due to changes in the Visa and MasterCard regulations or changes in Credit Card fees or changes in the Average Bill Amount. 4 Payment Processing 4.1 Explicit User Confirmation Paymentus shall confirm the dollar amount of all Payments and the corresponding Paymentus Service Fee to be charged to a Card and electronically obtain the User approval of such charges prior to initiating Card authorizations transaction. Paymentus will provide User with electronic confirmation of all transactions. 4.2 Merchant Account Paymentus will arrange for the Customer to have a merchant account with the Paymentus Authorized Processor for processing and settlement of the credit card transactions. 4.3 Card Authorization For authorization purposes, Paymentus will electronically transmit all Card transactions to the appropriate Card -processing center, in real time as the transactions occur. 4.4 Settlement Paymentus together with its authorized Card processor shall forward the payment transactions and corresponding Paymentus Service Fee to the appropriate card organizations for settlement directly to the Customer's depository bank account previously designated by the Customer (hereinafter the "Customer Bank Account'). Paymentus together with Paymentus Authorized Processor will continuously review its settlement and direct debit processes for its simplicity and efficiencies. Customer and Paymentus agree to fully co- operate with each other if Paymentus were to change its settlement and invoicing processes. -3 The Reaf-Time Bill Payment Company 4.5 Reversed or Chargeback Transactions Reversed or Chargeback Transactions can be reversed by the Customer using the Paymentus software provided ("Agent Dashboard"). The Payment Amount will be refunded to the User, however, except in the case of a Substantiated Chargeback transaction as defined below, the Paymentus Service Fee is non- refundable, and therefore the corresponding Paymentus Service fces will not be refunded to the User. The remittance file will contain a record of any such transaction whenever such transactions occur. With respect to all Chargeback Card Transactions that are substantiated by a User and approved by an authorized representative of Paymentus and the Customer ("Substantiated Chargeback"): (i) the Customer authorizes Paymentus and Paymentus Authorized Processor (and/or the respective card organization) to debit the Customer Bank Account for the amount of the corresponding Payment and (ii) Paymentus shall refund to the Card organization for credit back to the User the corresponding Paymentus Service Fees. The Customer agrees that it shall not refund in cash to a User any Payment made using Paymentus' Services. Since Paymentus receives no revenue from any Payment that is charged back, the Customer will be responsible for the fees associated with Chargeback processing by Paymentus Authorized Processor. Paymentus together with Paymentus Authorized Processor will continuously review its processes for Reversed or Chargeback transactions, for simplicity and efficiencies. Customer and Paymentus agree to fully co-operate with each other if Paymentus requires any change its settlement and invoicing processes for such transactions. 5 General Conditions of Services 5.1 Service Reports Paymentus shall provide Customer with reports summarizing use of the Services by Users for a given reporting period. 5.2 User Adoption Communication by Customer Customer will make Paymentus' Services available to its residential and commercial customers by different means of customer communication including a) through bills, invoices and other notices; b) by providing IVR and Web payment details on the Customer's website including a "Pay Now" or similar link on a mutually agreed prominent place on the web site; c) through customer's general IVR/Phone system; and d) other channels deemed appropriate by the Customer. Paymentus shall provide Customer with logos, graphics and other marketing materials for Customer's use in its communications with its users regarding the Services and/or Paymentus. Both parties agree that Paymentus will be presented as a payment method option. Customer will communicate Paymentus option to its end residential and commercial customers wherever Customer usually communicates its other payment methods. 5.3 Independent Contractor Customer and Paymentus agree and understand that the relationship between both parties is that of an independent contractor. 5.4 Customer's Responsibilities In order for Paymentus to provide Services outlined in this Agreement, the Customer shall co- operate with Paymentus by: -4 The Real -Time Bill Payment Comp y (i) Customer will enter into all applicable merchant Card or cash management agreements. (ii) For the duration of this Agreement, Customer will keep a bill payment link connecting to Paymentus System at a prominent and mutually agreed location on the Customer website. The phone number for the IVR payment will also be added to the web site. Customer will also add the IVR payment option as part of the Customer's general phone system. (iii) User Adoption marketing as described in 5.2. (iv) Within 30 days of the merchant account setup, Customer will launch the service to the Users. 6 Governing Laws This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of California. 7 Communications 7.1 Authorized Representative Each party shall designate an individual to act as a representative for the respective party, with the authority to transmit instructions and receive information. The parties may from time to time designate other individuals or change the individuals. 7.2 Notices All notices of any type hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by Post or by hand delivery to an individual authorized to receive mail for the below listed individuals, all to the following individuals at the following locations: To Customer do ( ) (Phone) ( ) (Fax) To Paymentus do President and CEO 3455 Peachtree Road N.E. 5th Floor Atlanta, GA 30326 (888) 476-8910 (Phone) (877) 882-1676 (Fax) Notices shall be declared to have been given or received on the date the notice is physically received if given by hand delivery, or if notices given by US Post, then notice shall be deemed to have been given upon 5 The Real -Time Bill Payment Company on date said notice was deposited in the mail addressed in the manner set forth above. Any party hereto by giving notice in the manner set forth herein may unilaterally change the name of the person to whom notice is to be given or the address at which the notice is to be received. 7.3 Interpretation It is the intent of the parties that no portion of this Agreement shall be interpreted more harshly against either of the parties as the drafter. 7.4 Amendment of Agreement Modifications or changes in this Agreement must be in writing and executed by the parties bound to this Agreement. 7.5 Severability If a word, sentence or paragraph herein shall be declared illegal, unenforceable, or unconstitutional, the said word, sentence or paragraph shall be severed from this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be read as if said word, sentence or paragraph did not exist. 7.6 Attomey's Fees Should any litigation arise concerning this Agreement between the parties hereto, the parties agree to bear their own costs and attorneys fees. 7.7 Confidentiality Customer will not disclose to any third party or use for any purpose inconsistent with this Agreement any confidential or proprietary non-public information it obtains during the term of this Agreement about Paymentus' business, operations, financial condition, technology, systems, no -how, products, services, suppliers, customers, marketing data, plans, and models, and personnel. Paymentus will not disclose to any third party or use for any purpose inconsistent with this Agreement any confidential User information it receives in connection with its performance of the services. 7.8 Intellectual Property In order that the Customer may promote the Services and Paymentus' role in providing the Services, Paymentus grants to Customer a revocable, non-exclusive, royalty -free, license to use Paymentus' logo and other service marks (the "Paymentus Marks") for such purpose only. Customer does not have any right, title, license or interest, express or implied in and to any object code, software, hardware, trademarks, service mark, trade name, formula, system, know-how, telephone number, telephone line, domain name, URL, copyright image, text, script (including, without limitation, any script used by Paymentus on the IVR or the WebSite) or other intellectual property right of Paymentus ("Paymentus Intellectual Property"). All Paymentus Marks, Paymentus Intellectual Property, and the System and all rights therein (other than rights expressly granted herein) and goodwill pertain thereto belong exclusively to Paymentus. 7.9 Force Majeure Paymentus will be excused from performing the Services as contemplated by this Agreement to the extent its performance is delayed, impaired or rendered impossible by acts of God or other events that are beyond Paymentus' reasonable control and without its fault or judgment, including without limitation, natural disasters, war, terrorist acts, riots, acts of a governmental entity (in a sovereign or contractual capacity), fire, storms, quarantine restrictions, floods, explosions, labor strikes, labor walk -outs, extra -ordinary losses utilities (including telecommunications services), external computer "hacker" attacks, and/or delays of common carrier. 6 The Real -Time Bill Payment Company 7.10 Time of the Essence Paymentus and Customer acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence for the completion of the Services to be performed and each parties respective obligations under this Agreement. 8 Indemnification 8.1 Paymentus Indemnification and Hold Harmless Paymentus agrees to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the Customer and its governing officials, agents, employees, and attorneys (collectively, the "Customer lndemnitees") from and against all liabilities, demands, losses, damages, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs), incurred by any Customer Indemnitee as a result or arising out of (i) the willful misconduct or negligence of Paymentus in performing the Services or (ii) a material breach by Paymentus of its covenants. 8.2 Customer Indemnification and Hold Harmless Customer agrcc to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless Paymentus, its affiliates, officers, directors, stockholders, agents, employees, and representatives, (collectively, the "Paymentus Indemnitees") from and against all liabilities, demands, losses, damages, costs or expenses (including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and expenses) incurred by any Paymentus Indemnitee as a result or arising out of (i) the willful misconduct or negligence of Customer related to the Services or (ii) a material breach of Customer's covenants. 8.3 Warranty Disclaimer Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, Paymentus disclaims all other representations or warranties, express or implied, made to the Customer or any other person, including without limitation, any warranties regarding quality, suitability, merchantability, fitness, for a particular purpose or otherwise of any services or any good provided incidental to the Services provided under this Agreement. 8.4 Limitation of Liability Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties agree that neither party shall be liable to the other for any lost profits, lost savings or other special, indirect or consequential damages, even if the party has been advised of or could have foreseen the possibility of such damages. Paymentus' total liability for damages for any and all actions associated with this Agreement or the Services shall in no event exceed the specific dollar amount of the Paymentus Service Fee paid to Paymentus for the particular payment transaction which is the subject matter of the claim of damage. -7 The Real -Time Bitt Payment Company 9 Term and Termination 9.1 Term The term of this Agreement shall commence on the effective date of this Agreement and continue for a period of 3 (three) years ("Initial Term") from the Launch Date. Services under this Agreement shall begin within 30 days of the merchant account setup. At the end of the Initial Term, this Agreement will automatically renew for successive three (3) year periods unless either Customer or Paymentus provide the other party with not less than 6 (six) months prior written notice before such automatic renewal date that such party elects not to automatically renew the term of this Agreement. 9.2 Material Breach A material breach of this Agreement shall be cured within 90 (ninety) days ("Cure Period") after a party notifies the other of such breach. In the event, such material breach has not been cured within the Cure Period, the non -breaching party can terminate this Agreement by providing the other party with a 30 (thirty) days notice. 9.3 Upon Termination Upon termination of this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate with one another to ensure that all Payments are accounted for and all refundable transactions have been completed. Upon termination, Paymentus shall cease all Services being provided hereunder unless otherwise directed by the Customer in writing. 8 The Real -Time Biit Payment Company Schedule A — Paymentus Service Fee Schedule Paymentus Service Fee charged to the User will be based on one of the following table: Payment Amount Paymentus Service Fee Residential Utility Bills Flat Fee of $3.95 • Average Bill Amount of $100.00 • Maximum Payment amount $200.00. Multiple payments can be made. Commercial Utility Customers Flat Fee of $15.95 • Maximum Payment amount $500.00. Multiple payments can be made. Note: Multiple payments can be made. The Paymentus Service Fee will be collected in addition to the end -user bill payment total. Paymentus may apply different limits per transactions for user adoption or to mitigate risks. -9- AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Rick Miller, Deputy City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for City Council. Meeting of September 3, 2009. Additional Funding for Police Expansion Project Consent Calendar Item Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) X City Departments Item Attachments include: A. Letter of Explanation from Bonney Architects B. Updated design plan for additional expansion C.Staff Report Dated July 18, 2008 Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: _ Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting Habib Motlagh, City Engineer DATE: August 26, 2009 Chief Bill Tyler C:\Documents and Settings\Rmiller\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK98\AGENDA Transmittal Form Additional Funding_Police Expansion Award Bid.doc AGENDA ITEM 5-1 September 3, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bill Tyler, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Additional Funding For Police Station Expansion Project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion: • Appropriate additional funds for the police station expansion project, in the amount of $119,190.00. 1. $110,000 from TASIN funds, and 2. $9,190 from Police Impact Fee Fund BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of July 18, 2009, City Council awarded the Police Expansion Project to Hamel Contracting. The project began in July 2009 and a completion date is expected in December of 2009. At this point in time the foundation stabilization is complete, and the building pad is ready for construction of the footings. The foundation stabilization was done with a pressure grouting process as recommended by the geotechnical engineer from Earth Strata Inc. The existing soil was not acceptable for construction of a new building or addition under current codes. As pressure grouting proceeded the geotechnical engineer found the grout process was improving the soil condition, but not achieving the desired results. Additional grout and foundation modifications were needed to complete the grouting process, and satisfy current building codes. The work was completed at an additional cost of $62,252.47. This exhausted the original contingency provided by this project. In addition to the contractor costs, Earth Strata monitored the pressure grouting which cost an additional $18,258.00, which exhausted the majority of the original soft cost. The contractor is ready to proceed with the underground utilities and foundation. Page 1 of 3 DISCUSSION: Prior to going to bid for this project, we investigated expanding the square footage of the project by 333 square feet. However, at the time we thought the increased project size would exceed our budget. As the bids came in we reconsidered the increased project size and a funding source was identified, however we waited to see what the final cost of the pressure grouting would be. The additional 333 square feet would address and provide accessible restrooms for both men and women. Any future remodeling to the existing facility would require upgrades to our current restrooms. Improving the restrooms at a later date would most likely be more costly and an added disruption to police operations. The larger plan also increases the space to the emergency operations center and some of the office space. The cost for the larger addition is expected to add $89,190.00 in hard and soft cost to the project, excluding any contingency cost. In summary, if the expanded project is approved an additional $68,000.00 for construction hard cost, $30,000.00 for contingency, and $21,190.00 for soft cost, would be needed to complete this project. The additional soft cost would be allocated to Bonney Architects for additional design and operational cost. Total funding allocation requested is $119,190.00. Please review the attached cost analysis for a detailed breakdown of funds. ALTERNATIVES: Approval: Approve additional funding for Hamel Contracting to complete project with additional square footage. Denial: Do not approve the additional funding for additional square footage. FISCAL IMPACT: The original cost of the project is broken down as follows: • Base Bid: $453,646.00 • 15% Contingency: $68,047.00 • Soft Cost: $26,000.00 Total original construction cost: $547,693.00 Additional Funds Requested To Complete Project: ■ Hard cost: $68,000.00 ■ Contingency: $30,000.00 ■ Soft Cost:: $21,190.00 Total additional funds being requested: $119,190.00 Page 2 of 3 Funding Source: The construction cost can be funded by Project 08-012 (TASIN), which has a fund balance of $110,000.00, and the Police Development Impact Fee Fund #11 which has a fund balance of $71,000.00 ATTACHMENTS: ■ Letter of Explanation and Cost Analysis from Bonney Architects. ■ A. - Updated station expansion design plan, depicting additional square footage, provided by Bonney Architects. ■ Staff Report dated July 18, 2009, Award of Contract For Police Station Expansion Project. Page 3 of 3 August 25, 2009 Lt. William Tyler City of San Jacinto Police Department 160 West Sixth Street San Jacinto, California 92584 Regarding: Status of the Police Station Addition Project Dear Lt. Tyler, I would like to summarize the foundation issue on the Police Station Addition Project, and address proceeding forward, including the proposed additional 333 square feet. At this point in time the foundation stabilization is complete, and the building pad is ready for construction of the footings. The foundation stabilization was done with a pressure grouting process at the recommendation of the geotechnical engineer, Earth -Strata, Inc. The existing soil condition was not acceptable for construction of a new building or addition under the current codes, as it would allow too much movement and settlement in the event of an earthquake. In the case of an empty construction site, the solution to this would normally be to remove large amounts of dirt and compact it as it is replaced. Since three side of the addition are against existing buildings, there was concern that removing dirt would undermine the foundations. Pressure grouting was recommended as an alterative. As the pressure grouting proceeded, the geotechnical engineer found that the grout process was improving the condition of the soil, but still not achieving the desired results. After reviewing the results and making some adjustments to the grouting process, the soils engineer determined that a combination of additional grout and modifications to the foundation design would achieve and end result acceptable under current building codes. This work was completed at an additional cost of $62,252.47. Most of this cost was for additional grout. This exhausted the construction contingency originally provided for this project. As such it is advisable to budget an additional $30,000 for future unforeseen conditions common with a renovation project such as this. BONNEY ARCHITECTS 300 EAST STATE ST. SUITE 620 REDLANDS CALIFORNIA 92373 • P. 909 793 6489 • F. 909 798 6874 At this point the contractor is ready to proceed with the underground utilities and foundations. The next issue to address is increasing the project by 333 square feet. This was investigated before the project went to public bid, but at that time it was thought the increased project size would exceed the budget. When the bids came in below the cost estimate, the additional space was reconsidered. One big advantage of the extra square footage is addressing issue of accessible restrooms in the entire facility. The expanded scope would provide accessible restrooms for both men and women. It is important to note that any future remodeling to the existing facility would require the restroom upgrades anyway. To accomplish this by remodeling the existing restrooms would be more difficult and disruptive to police station operations. The larger plan also adds more space to the emergency operations center and some of the office spaces. The cost of the larger addition is expected to add $89,190 to the project. As much as this seems, it is more economical and less disruptive to include this work in the current contract than to perform it later. In summary, an additional $119,190 should be allocated to complete the project; $30,000 to replenish the contingency, and $89,190 for the additional 333 square feet. I am available to address any questions that you or other City officials may have on this matter. Sincerely, Geoffrey A. Bonney, AIA Principal Bonney Architects Enclosure: Spread Sheet of Cost Analysis SERGEANT I 156 S.F. II'-4"xl3'-9" 0 SERGEANT 2 156 S.F. II'-4"x13'—W SERGEANT 3 156 S.F. I I' —4"x 13' —cl" HALLWAY I 64 S.F. 14'-3"x4'-6" 103 OFFICE I IIMUOMI;il i iII I HJ 162 S. . 12'—q"x13'-4" HALLWAY 3 139 S.F. 30'—II"x4'-6" 108 CONFERENCE/E.O.C, 400 S.F. 24'-3"x16'-5 I/2" fy O Lojc ELEC. R1" 1, 56 S.F. 9'-0"x6'-2" MEC AGENDA ITEM June 18, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bill Tyler, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Award of Contract for the Police Station Expansion Project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion: • Award the contract for the Police Station Expansion project to Hamel Contracting Inc. in the amount of $453,646.00. • Allocate funds for the contract amount, plus 15% contingency and additional funds for soft costs as outlined in the staff report. • Reject all other bids. BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of October 19, 2006, staff submitted a conceptual report regarding the need to expand the Police Department and to purchase additional equipment. The relevant portion from that report is excerpted below: Attachment A. Police Station Expansion — The approval of the Police Department's grant submission for TASIN funds to expand the existing station was approved and funded for $311,000. The expansion would extend the life of the existing facility by approximately 9-15 years depending on the rate of population growth in the city. Due to the increase in construction costs and materials, additional funds would be required to complete this project as planned. I recommend that design work be initiated and possible funding sources be identified to complete the expansion as originally proposed." DISCUSSION: On June 8, 2009, the City Clerk opened bids for the Police Station Expansion project. A total of 13 bids were received, with the low bid submitted from Hamel Contracting Inc., from Murrieta, Ca, in the amount of $453,646.00. Approvals City Manager: Page 1 of 2 Finance Director: This bid was considerably lower than the engineer's estimate of $600,000.00. A summary of the bids received is attached to this report. At the time of preparation of this report, Geoffrey Bonney, from Bonney Architects, was checking on references for the low bidder. At the City Council meeting this work will be complete and staff will have a recommendation for contract award. Construction is scheduled to begin in mid -July of 2009. The construction will last approximately four months, with completion expected in December. ALTERNATIVES: Approval: Award the contract to Hamel Contracting Inc. Denial: Do not approve the contract and provide staff with further direction. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the project is broken down as follows: • Base Bid: $453,646.00 • 15% Contingency: $68,047.00 • Soft Cost: $26,000.00 Total construction cost: $547,693.00 The construction cost can be funded by the remaining funds of $309,000.00, in Project 08-012 (TASIN). An additional appropriation of $238,693.00 from the Police Development Impact Fee fund. ATTACHMENTS: • A. - Station expansion design plan provided by Bonney Architects. • B. - Staff report dated April 16, 2009, Approve Plans and Authorize Bid. • C. - Staff report dated March 6, 2008, SB 621 Indian Gaming Impact Grant, approve appropriations. • D. - Bidders List Page 2 of 2 AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Rick Miller, Deputy City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for kego4u7,43•' Consent Calendar Item CC_ [CCor RDA] meeting of CLo Suit.F sUU Gn Of" 6/c,►.,/A.r S" .r 4.2 (name — brief description) Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) V City Departments Item Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. gEsocuT/pJ B. C. 7-3-a (date) Other: oi- Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Couru251 0 r- /211/04-6'r,0 eL ex"( vy= ` 716= i3&4n fZ _ Please record and return conformed copy t sox/ .qu S o?&cer Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting DATE: g'017-° 7 ievt [Name or Initials], [Title] S:\City Clerk\CC RPT 06\AGENDA Transmittal Form.doc AGENDA ITEM b. 3 September 3, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: ri ity Manager and City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Opposing Closure of Gilman Hot Springs Road RECOMMENDATION: Consider, discuss and adopt resolution opposing closure of Gilman Hot Springs Road BACKGROUND: The City of San Jacinto ("City") has been requested to support, and in fact apply for, the closure of a certain portion of Gilman Hot Springs Road, commencing at Highway 79 and traveling easterly to State Street ("Gilman Hot Springs Road"). Gilman Hot Springs Road is located within the territorial jurisdiction of the County of Riverside ("County"). The County has designated Gilman Hot Springs Road as a four lane, "Secondary Highway", with an ultimate build -out width of a one hundred foot (100') right of way according to the San Jacinto Valley Area Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"), Circulation Elements, Figure 7. According to the Specific Plan, Scenic Highways, Figure 9, Gilman Hot Springs Road is also a County Eligible Scenic Highway within San Jacinto Valley. Gilman Hot Springs Road is significant to the safety and well being of the City and San Jacinto Valley in numerous ways, including the following: it provides a means of protecting the Valley from wildfires that occur in the wildland areas of the mountains to the North of San Jacinto, by providing vehicular access for fire fighting equipment and personnel; it provides access to the historically significant "Massacre Canyon" (HISTORIC SPOTS IN CALIFORNIA, Riverside County 4th ed. DOUGLAS E. KYLE, pp. 276-277.); and Gilman Hot Springs Road provides one of only a few thoroughfares providing access to and from the City and to the neighboring Soboba Tribal reservation. According to SCAG figures, population and employment growth in the San Jacinto Valley is expected to increase at historically high rates into the year 2030, and at rates that outpace the rest of Riverside County, with population expected to increase by 50% and employment expected to increase by 51 % in the City alone. Therefore, the continued presence of Gilman Hot Springs Road, and indeed its expansion to its ultimate build -out width, as a regional transportation corridor is necessary for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare of the residents, businesses and visitors to the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Valley. Page 1 of 2 The accompanying resolution establishes the City Council's opposition to the vacation, closure or reduction in capacity of Gilman Hot Springs Road. In addition, the resolution supports the ultimate widening and build -out of Gilman Hot Springs Road to its ultimate Secondary Highway roadwidth. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Review and approve Resolution Opposing Closure of Gilman Hot Springs Road (City Staff Recommendation). 2) Support and apply for the closure of Gilman Hot Springs Road and Direct Staff to Draft Resolution to that effect. 3) Take no action. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The approval of this Resolution is not likely to have any significant budgetary impact. Attachments Resolution Opposing Closure of Gilman Hot Springs Road Page 2 of 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE CLOSURE OF GILMAN HOT SPRINGS ROAD WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto ("City") has been requested to support, and in fact apply for, the closure of a certain portion of Gilman Hot Springs Road, commencing at Highway 79 and traveling easterly to State Street (hereinafter "Gilman Hot Springs Road"); and WHEREAS, Gilman Hot Springs Road is located within the territorial jurisdiction of the County of Riverside ("County"); and WHEREAS, according to the San Jacinto Valley Area Specific Plan, Circulation Elements, Figure 7, the County has designated Gilman Hot Springs Road as a four lane, "Secondary Highway", with an ultimate build -out width of a one hundred foot (100') right of way; and WHEREAS, according to the San Jacinto Valley Area Specific Plan, Scenic Highways, Figure 9, Gilman Hot Springs Road is a County Eligible Scenic Highway within San Jacinto Valley; and WHEREAS, Gilman Hot Springs Road provides a means of protecting the Valley from wildfires that occur in the wildland areas of the mountains to the North of San Jacinto, by providing vehicular access for fire fighting equipment and personnel; and WHEREAS, Gilman Hot Springs Road provides access to the historically significant "Massacre Canyon" (HISTORIC SPOTS IN CALIFORNIA, Riverside County 4th ed. DOUGLAS E. KYLE, pp. 276-277.); and WHEREAS, Gilman Hot Springs Road provides one of only a few thoroughfares providing access to and from the City and to the neighboring Soboba Tribal reservation; and WHEREAS, according to SCAG figures, population and employment growth in the San Jacinto Valley is expected to increase at historically high rates into the year 2030, and at rates that outpace the rest of Riverside County, with population expected to increase by 58% and employment expected to increase by 51 % in the City of San Jacinto alone; and Page 1 of WHEREAS, therefore the continued presence of Gilman Hot Springs Road, and indeed its expansion to its ultimate build -out width, as a regional transportation corridor is necessary for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare of the residents, businesses and visitors to the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto: SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. Opposition to Closure of Gilman Hot Springs Road. The City Council hereby opposes, in the strongest of terms, the vacation, closure or reduction in capacity of Gilman Hot Springs Road. In addition, the City Council supports the ultimate widening and build -out of Gilman Hot Springs Road, to its ultimate Secondary Highway roadwidth. City staff is authorized and directed take any and all actions necessary or convenient to the implementation of the City Council's policy, as set forth in this Resolution. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. APPROVED and ADOPTED, this 3rd day of September, 2009, by the following vote: Vote: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: ATTEST: Barry McClellan, City Clerk City of San Jacinto by Dale Stubblefield, Mayor Page 2 of a: AGENDA - TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: Rick Miller, Deputy City Clerk Enclosure: Staff Report for City Council meeting of September 3, 2009 Comments to and from the public regarding Soboba fee to Trust Application (name — brief description) Consent Calendar Item Public Hearing Item: Notice required yes no Copy attached yes no Published (date(s)) Notices sent (date(s) _X_ City Departments Item Attachments include (this needs to match the attachment list in the Staff Report: A. August 15, 2009 Press Enterprise Commentary B. August 24, 2009 Citizen Letter to City Manager C. August 25, 2009 Mayor's Letter to the Editor (Press Enterprise) Other: Please provide a fully executed copy of documents to: Please record and return conformed copy Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary Comments: Name of person that will be presenting item at the meeting: City Manager & City Attorney DATE: August 27, 2009 Jeff Ballinger, City Attorney [Name or Initials], [Title] AGENDA ITEM Jam• 9 September 3, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager and City Attorney SUBJECT: Comments Made to and From the Public regarding Soboba Fee to Trust Application RECOMMENDATION: Consider, discuss and possibly provide staff direction regarding recent comments made to and from the public regarding the Soboba Fee to Trust Application BACKGROUND: In response to recent comments made to and from the public regarding the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians' Horseshoe Grande Fee to Trust application, the Mayor has requested that this item be agendized. The following is a chronology of events surrounding the trust application. • City becomes aware of fee to trust application in December of 2007. • January 8, 2008-- City attends Bureau of Indian Affairs ("BIA") scoping meeting regarding environmental issues associated with the project. City officially takes a "wait and see" position on the project. • January 17, 2008-- City sends a seven page comment letter, commenting on issues such as aesthetics, air quality, land use, noise, public safety services (police and fire), traffic, and socio-economics. • April 4, 2008—Then Mayor Ayres and Councilmember Stubblefield attend meeting at Soboba Springs Mobilehome Park to hear issues of concern to the public. • Spring 2008—Several gunfights involving Tribal members, or on the existing reservation, occur. Tribe attempts to seal off its reservation from law enforcement, prompting concern by the Riverside County Sheriff regarding the interpretation of Public Law 280. • May 20, 2008—City sends a written request to the Tribe, seeking a temporary withdrawal of the project application in light of recent violence. • June 23, 2008—After not hearing back from the Tribe, the City sends a written Page 1 of 3 request to the BIA, seeking the same temporary withdrawal of the project application. • July 24, 2008—Tribe and BIA hold an "open forum" to discuss Public Law 280. City was not invited, and was refused attendance. • September 12, 2008—City provides a ten (10) page comments letter regarding the Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("ADEIS"). Comments are based on input from various City departments, including Planning, City Attorney, Police, Fire, and Finance. • September 23, 2008—Tribal Subcommittee meeting cancelled after BIA advises the City that it is unable/unwilling to meet to discuss the project application. • December 2008—City Attorney meets individually with newly seated Councilmembers Potts and Di Memmo to go over history of project application, including 3 binders of written material relating to the application. • June 24, 2009—City receives a multi -binder hard copy, and CD, of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS"). DEIS is also made available online. • July 22, 2009—Tribal Subcommittee reviews the results of City staffs review of the DEIS. Comments are based on input from various City departments, including Planning, the City Attorney, Police and Fire. • August 5, 2009—City Council reviews the results of City staffs review of the DEIS. City Council approves City's opposition position to the project, including the Mayor's proposed speech and powerpoint presentation. Vote is taken, 4-1, with Councilmember Di Memmo voting against. • August 5, 2009—City Council attends BIA scoping meeting regarding DEIS. • August 15, 2009—Councilmember Di Memmo's commentary, entitled, "Uninformed Vote Would Betray Trust" appears in local edition of Press Enterprise. • Throughout the entire above -referenced time period, various individuals have appeared at the "public comment" portion of the City Council meetings, unanimously expressing opposition to the trust application. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Discuss and provide direction to staff regarding public comments on fee to trust application. 2) Take no action. Page 2 of 3 BUDGETARY IMPACT: The Council's discussion of this topic is not likely to have any significant budgetary impact. Attachments: August 15, 2009 Press Enterprise Commentary August 24, 2009 Citizen Letter to City Manager August 25, 2009 Mayor's Letter to the Editor (Press Enterprise) Page 3 of 3 Uninforme' vote ould betray trust swore an a oath to serve my community environmental impact re- - not the capricious whims view of the proposed expan- of the council or any special sion. To the best of my interests. I will continue to knowledge, the city has not pursue' all available informa- conducted its own environ- tion that will assist me in mental review, nor prepared casting an informed vote. I a response to the bureau's, work for you - the citizens on which the City Council of San Jacinto — you don't could base a vote. I cannot in work for me. good conscience cast an in- In these very difficult eco- formed and responsible vote nomic times, to adequately without first being provided represent the taxpaying citi- the requisite information zees of my community, it is and review. my duty to conduct a com-, I advised my colleagues on prehensive and economical the council, who sought a 5-0 review of all available in vote against expansion of formation on any issues re the reservation, that I would quiring my vote. I promised not, and could not, vote yes transparency, accountabii- or no as I did not have ity and responsibility during sufficient' background infor- my campaign and I intend to mation to do so. I advised my continue to keep those prom colleagues that if they insist- ises. ed on calling for a vote, I Steve Di Mamma is a member of the would have to vote no for San Jackao City Council. I that reason. he Soboba Band of Lui- No minutes or recordings seno Indians is working of the council's tribal sub - to incorporate land the committee meetings on the tribe owns within the city of issue were offered. There - San Jacinto into its reserva- fore, I spoke to the deputy tion. Just prior to a public city clerk and requested hearing held last week by minutes, reports, or tape the Bureau of Indian Affairs, recordings of meetings of the San Jacinto City Council the subcommittee, which met in ' special session to had been tasked to deal with consider a resolution op- the Soboba expansion posed to the expansion. I project. I was advised that cast the lone opposing vote none was taken or reported. on the resolution. itt r The bureau scheduled the public hearing to hear any legal objectionsrel tedt an hen I took office as a San Jacinto City Coun- cil member I 8/24/2009 Barry McClellan San Jacinto City Manager 595 S. San Jacinto Ave. San Jacinto, Ca. 92583 Dear Mr. McClellan: My home is located by the Soboba Springs golf course and I strenuously object to the " fee to trust" proposal the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians are pursuing, so they can build a hotel/casino on property they currently own in our neighborhood. City Councilman, Steve Di Memmo, wrote a piece plublished in Press -Enterprise newspaper regarding his NO vote on the citys resolution to oppose the expansion. I called him and wished to speak to him about the article and he came to my home to talk to me. 1 referred to a copy of a letter many of my neighbors had signed stating our objections to the "fee to trust" and we discussed his lack of information about the number of people that opposed the issue. He said the only way to stop this was to file a lawsuit and he didn't feel that the citizens of San Jacinto wanted to sec their tax dollars spent in this way. He then told me that he bad been employed by the federal government and knew how they worked and that his personal opinion was that the Departtnent of Indian Affairs vas going to sign off on this matter, that it was a "done deal". I felt that he was trying to convey to me that I was wasteing my time and energy to pursue the blocking of the "fee to trust". I do not feel that it was appropriate for him to attempt to discourage me in this way, either intended or not. Sincerely, Shirley A. Prince Blair 857 Bergamo Ave. San Jacinto,CA 92583 Wel Noce Olt SAN JAC WTO August 25, 2009 Editor, Press Enterprise I write this in response to the political commentary prepared by my colleague on the San Jacinto City Council, Steve Di Memmo, regarding his views of the Soboba Band's request to expand their reservation in order to relocate their gaming operation and their extensive entertainment complex into a residential community in the City of San Jacinto. As Councilman Di Memmo stated in his commentary published by the Press Enterprise on August 15, 2009, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) on behalf of the Soboba Band and did hold a scoping meeting on August 5, 2009, to solicit input from the community. Also on August 5, 2009, prior to the scoping meeting, the Council held a Special Meeting to review and approve a presentation of the City's concerns regarding the BIA's DEIS. First of all, I take exception to Mr. Di Memmo's claim that the City's concerns on the expansion of the reservation are based on "capricious whims." He would have you believe that it is a capricious whim to be concerned about public safety and crime, based on evidence provided to the City Council from law enforcement personnel. It was pointed out to the City Council that from 2004 through 2008 Riverside County Sheriff calls for service increased by over 300 percent. More than 60 percent of these calls and nearly 58 percent of reservation crime were related to the casino. In addition, over the last 8 years the Riverside County Sheriff responded to 15 calls for service for homicides and removed over 70 banned weapons, including military style assault rifles. It is certainly not a capricious whim to want to protect the citizens of San Jacinto from such criminal activity. Mr. Di Memmo also suggests that to be concerned about the loss of peace and tranquility for more than 1,000 residents of this City is a capricious whim. The proposed casino and entertainment complex would be located immediately adjacent to the Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park and within one-fourth of a mile from an established residential community on Soboba Road. Residents of those neighborhoods would have to contend with a substantial increase in traffic, as over 22,000 cars a day are projected to visit the casino. In addition, a 4,000 seat outdoor arena is proposed within 300 feet of 150 existing homes. The City Council has repeatedly heard from the residents in those neighborhoods, who are currently experiencing disruptions to their way of living, and expect (quite naturally, I think) more disruptions from the proposed project. Expressing the City Council's concerns, based on our residents' own comments, is certainly not a capricious whim. From the Office of the: Mayor 595 South San Jacinto enuc San Jacinto. CA 92583 Ph (951) 487-7330 Fay (95I 1 654-3728 W WW.ci.�an-Iaeinw ca.tI Letter to the Editor, Press Enterprise August 25, 2009 Page 2 Finally, Mr. Di Memmo contends that the concerns about lost property tax revenue and the creation of jurisdictional islands are capricious whims. The proposed casino expansion will remove about 300 acres of land from the City's tax rolls. The proposed expansion will also create three jurisdictional islands of City land that will be completely surrounded by reservation lands. In order to serve those residents, non -emergency personnel and emergency vehicles would have to cross through reservation lands first. The Soboba Band has restricted such movements on existing reservation lands. Once again, expressing concern about the City's ability to serve existing City residents is certainly not a capricious whim. That is the City Council's duty. In closing, Councilman Di Memmo contends that he "cannot in good conscience cast an informed and responsible vote without first being provided the requisite information and review." The information noted above was provided to Councilman Di Memmo along with the rest of the City Council. Most if not all of it is in the voluminous Draft Environmental Impact Study, which was available online. The facts noted above are not in dispute. The facts were certainly comprehensive enough for my fellow Councilmembers to make an informed vote. I encourage Councilman Di Memmo to take stock of the facts and do whatever it takes to protect the citizens he was elected to represent. ours Truly, 06 S Dale Stubblefield Mayor, City of San Jacinto 595 South San Jacinto .Avenue From the Office of the Mayor San .Facinto, CA 92583 Ph (95I) 487-7330 Fax (951) 654-372 www.ci.san-jacinto.ca.us PACIFIC D EVELOPMENT PA RTNERs, LLC August 19, 2009 Mr. Barry McClellan City Manager City of San Jacinto 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue Building A San Jacinto, CA 92583 Re: Gilman Springs Road Closure Dear Mr. McClellan: Via Overnight Delivery Ramona State Partners, LLC is the owner of the Village at San Jacinto shopping center located at the Northeast corner of Ramona Expressway and State Street. This center is anchored by Stater Bros. Markets and Walgreens Drugs. We have been informed that the County of Riverside will be considering a request by the Church of Scientology to have Gilman Springs closed to thru traffic. Ramona State Partners, LLC is requesting that the County of Riverside does not grant this request to close a public road simply because a property'owner is a major landowner on both sides of a road and wishes to restrict public access near their facilities. Restricting the flow of traffic on State Street will have a negative effect on our tenants, including many who live in the local community and are already economically challenged by the tough business environment. Closing the street would result in the potential failure of many businesses that rely on drive by traffic and easy access to their retail store.. Decisions like this should be made for the benefit of the entire community, not a select few. Approving this request would create a chilling precedent where the public good can be usurped by the needs of individual parties. We urge you to reject this request. Please call me at (310) 393-4141 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Ramona State Partners, LLC T Mark Burge cc: Tim Hults Habib Motlagh City of San Jacinto City of San Jacinto 501 SANTA MONICA BLVD., #312 SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 (310) 393-4141 (310) 393-4103 FAX www.pdpllc.sxet WEBSITE 30220 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD, #B SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675 (949) 481-0463 (949) 481-0452 FAX RAN }L A 55+ Community 800 West Community College Drive San Jacinto, California 92583 To: City of San Jacinto AUG 2 4 20Q9 Community Association Telephone (951) 654-3366 We, the board of directors of Heritage Ranch R.V. Park in San Jacinto join you in protesting the proposed closure of Gilman Springs Road, from Hiway 79 to Soboba Rd. Gilman Springs Road is a publicly owned and maintained road which should remain open to the residents and visitors to this area. This closure would create a great inconvenience for the residents of Heritage Ranch, which is a 385 unit park. Each lot is individually owned, giving 385 members a vote in the operation of the park. Our residents travel Gilman Springs Road when either going to I-10, or Moreno Valley and I-60. Having to travel back to the Ramona Expressway and out Hiway 79 is the less desirable route to travel. The closure of Gilman Springs Road woud be a great inconvenience, and is not acceptable. The only acceptable alternative to Gilman Springs Road being closed to the public would be for those wishing to close that stretch of highway, provide an alternate route through the area. For the board of directors: Harold F. Spange .erg Vice President Wanda Park Board Member Vern Y Secretary Philip Kepley Board Member A illTHEATUANAT. VEHICLE COMMUNITY MEMORANDUM August 28, 2009 TO: Barry McClellan, City Manager FROM: Bill Tyler, Chief of Police RE: Proposed Blocking of Gilman Springs Road PROPOSAL: Terminate public vehicular access of Gilman Springs Road between Sanderson/Lamb Canyon Rd (SR79) and State Street. BACKGROUND: Gilman Springs Road between SR79 and State St. is currently classified as an urban arterial roadway serving the San Jacinto/Hemet Valley area as a travel route to the Banning Pass and Moreno Valley areas. It is heavily used as a commuter route, and as a bypass of the heavily congested Sanderson/Ramona Expressway intersection. Based on 2006 data, this segment of roadway has an average daily volume of approximately 14,000 vehicles per day. Ramona Expressway between SR79 and State St is the other east/west roadway serving the same geographic area, and has an average daily volume of approximately 19,000 vehicles per day. TRAFFIC IMPACT: The closure of Gilman Springs Road between SR79 and State St. would force an additional 14,000 vehicles onto Ramona Expressway between Sanderson and State. During commuter peak hours, the intersection of Ramona Expressway and Sanderson is already heavily congested, resulting in commuter delays. Increasing the ADT to over 23,000 on Ramona Expressway would increase delays at signalized intersections between Sanderson and State, leading motorist to find alterative routes to avoid congestion. This could potentially lead to increased local traffic via side streets such as Lyon and Chase which are designed to serve residential areas. Commuters and other drivers who attempt to avoid traffic congested areas by taking alternate side streets increase the traffic volume and speed in those areas, changing the traffic flow characteristics and increasing potential conflicts with local motorist, bicycles and pedestrians. PUBLIC SAFETY IMPACT: In the event of an emergency situation calling for mutual aid from other law enforcement agencies or EMS in the northern areas of the city, (Chebella & Soboba or Country Club area), the closure of this segment of Gilman Springs Road would increase emergency response times by five minutes or more. Agencies responding from the Banning Pass or Moreno Valley areas would be forced to re-route south on Sanderson to Ramona Expressway, then back north to Soboba via State St or Lake Park. SUMMARY: The closure of Gilman Springs Road between SR79 and State St. without the construction of an acceptable alternative east/west route in the same area would have a negative impact on traffic through the city of San Jacinto, and would create a public safety issue due to unnecessary emergency response times. Sincerely, Bill Tyler, Chief of Police San Jacinto Police Department 2 John R. Hawkins Fire Chief Proudly serving the unincorporated areas of Riverside County and the Cities of: Banning Beaumont Calimesa Canyon Lake 4°. Coachella Desert Hot Springs Indian Wells Indio Lake Elsinore La Quinta Menifee Moreno Valley Palm Desert Perris Rancho Mirage San Jacinto Temecula Wildomar Board of Supervisors Bob Buster, District 1 John Tavaglione, District 2 Jeff Stone, District 3 Roy Wilson, District 4 Marion Ashley, District 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT In cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection AUG 2 6 2009 210 West San Jacinto Avenue • Perris, California 92570 • (951) 940-6900 • Fax (951) 940-6910 To: Barry McClellan Date: August 26, 2009 San Jacinto City Manager From: David Fulcher CAL FIRE/Riverside Unit San Jacinto Battalion Chief Subject: Proposed Road Closure - Gilman Springs Rd San Jacinto City Manager, Barry McClellan, I believe the closure of Gilman Springs Rd between Sanderson Ave and Soboba Rd will adversely impact the Riverside County Fire Department's ability to adequately serve the citizens that reside in and around the City of San Jacinto. Response times for emergency vehicles will be increased because of the additional traffic flow on secondary circulation routes and the additional distances they will be required to travel because of this proposed road closure. Unless the issues listed below can be adequately addressed and resolved, the fire department cannot support the road closure as proposed. The issues of proposed road closures are without doubt significant concerns for the fire department and many others who ordinarily use and have access to public roads and places. More than in most areas, circulation routes in and around the San Jacinto Valley are dictated by topography and landforms. Though limited in capacity, the continuity of the circulation system is critical because there are so few options for getting from one place to the other. The implementation and maintenance of a circulation system are designed to enhance public safety. Decision makers must implement land use characteristics with strict regard to the overall County circulation system with particular notice to: • Maintain alignment and coordination with the policies of the General Plan Circulation Element. • Provide the safety of the existing street network. • Preserve travel times between the connected communities. • Protect the existing community and environment. • Maintain or improve the reliability of travel and access to the existing street network. • Enhance emergency access and reduce emergency response times for areas served by the local circulation network. The area in which the proposed road closure is being proposed is in a "Hazardous Fire Area" The site also falls within a "State Responsibility Land Area," which makes secondary access a minimum fire safety standard under section 4290 of the Public Resource Code. The fire department has strong concerns about the need to allow emergency vehicles to get to the area and provide residents an alternative means of escape. In addition to fire emergencies, there are a number of operational activities that the fire department performs requiring an absolute coordination of arriving fire apparatus related to access points and reasonable response times to carry out the time critical mission of EMS, Hazmat, Technical Rescue, etc Respectfully, David Fulcher CAL FIRE / Riverside Unit San Jacinto Battalion Chief «rwrw.rvcfire.org_ cc: John Hawkins Steve Gallegos I would like to address the comments made to the San Jacinto City Council by the City Manager and City Attorney and the letter sent to The Press -Enterprise signed by Mayor Stubblefied. First of all, the fee to trust application process was enacted by the Department of Interior, a branch of the Federal Government of which the Soboba Tribe is under jurisdiction. The Tribe is following that process. Since the announcement of the Tribe's fee to trust application, the Tribal Council has been requesting to meet with the City's sub -committee for over a year; but to no avail. The City has refused. The City has requested the Bureau of Indian Affairs to be present during these meetings which the Bureau has refused. We, as leaders should simply sit down and discuss our issues and concerns without the perceived excuses and rhetoric. In reference to the PL 280 open forum meeting sponsored by the Tribe, the City was indeed invited to attend; however, the City refused to attend; they were not refused at the door as was stated - the City simply did not show. City Staff stated that throughout the entire time period, various individuals have appeared at the "public comment" portion of the City Council meetings unanimously expressing opposition to the trust application; however at no time thru public records has the item ever been put on the City Council agenda to give "Everyone" an opportunity to comment on the issue. Also, mentioned in the Mayor's letter is the loss of property taxes; which estimates to be $78,000 per year. The Tribe has donated $4 million dollars from 2005 to the present into this Valley; that's about 50 years worth of property taxes. Not to mention the Tribe does pay their "Fair Share" into the Special Distribution fund. The City has received from 2003-2007; $2,124,988 from the fund for various public safety projects. The Tribe has paid from 2006 to the present $20 million dollars to the Special Distribution Fund. Recently the City Council heard a survey report which indicated that "Jobs" was the number one concern for residents. The Tribe has provided 1200 various level jobs for local residents, which would increase to approximately 2000 with the new project - not to mention the in -direct revenue flowing into the local economy; which comes from employees spending their paychecks in the Valley. At no time has the Tribe attempted to seal off its Reservation from law enforcement as reported by your staff. As I have personally stated to City Council members the Tribe is continuously working with the Riverside County Sheriff's department tribal liaison September 3, 2009 Honorable Mayor Stubblefield and Council Members: My name is Jenice Leslie, I reside at 1793 Messina Drive in San Jacinto, Calif. It has been approximately one month since the most recent meeting at the Hemet Public Library with San Jacinto Valley citizens speaking to the Bureau of Indian Affairs representatives pertaining to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Proposed Hotel & Casino Project. At that meeting I spoke and expressed my concerns regarding the Horseshoe Grande Project. I do not need to readdress those same issues here tonight. What I want to do is make certain that this council continue to note that the reasons stated during the August 6th meeting and before remain realities for those of us that reside next to property and business already owned and operated by the same proposed owners/management for the above mentioned site. I want to bring to your attention the continued lack of cooperation that exists, even today, at the Soboba Springs Country Club — adjacent to our property. Just a short list of challenges that we have faced during the months of July, August, and briefly the beginning of September this year. • Thursday, July2, leaf blower in parking lot adjacent to our home beginning at 6:40 am; please be aware that the leaf blower if used 7 days a week at varying times of the morning; • Tuesday, July 7, heavy equipment use begins at 6:15 am; • Thursday, July 9, backhoe and dirt filler trucks begin at 6:05 am.; • Friday, July 10, backhoe begins at 6:05 am; • Thursday, July 16, loud music from parking lot 5:15 am; • Saturday, July 19, customers on balcony at clubhouse continue with loud voices, cars racing/screeching from parking lot until after 11 pm; • Friday, July 31, large power blower pointed up slope at homes begins and blows dust, etc. on our patios and in open doors and windows; • Sunday, August 2, 5:30 am, what appear to be intoxicated individuals (2) wander through neighborhood, down embankment at end of our cul-de-sac to parking lot of club house yelling, screaming, disrupting neighbors; call police as they appear to putting themselves in danger; do not know outcome; • Saturday, August 8, large gathering at club house (not loud during gathering) but upon leaving beginning at 12 midnight until 1 am horns blasting, yelling, screaming — Tribal Enforcement personnel present; • Sunday, August 9, 6:40 am large trash bins being filled with debris; • Monday, August 17, 6:30 am blower/trimmers/deliveries; blower continues until 8:25 am; • Friday, August 21, 6:00 am — power cleani being used on upper balcony facing our homes; 6:30 am weed whacker begins; • Saturday, August 22, 4:30 am heavy equipment delivery/ perhaps sod; • Saturday, August 29, 5:30 am deliveries/heavy equipment; And finally, just today at 5:50 am heavy equipment/delivery of some sort. Please know that this list is not all inclusive — but does give you a birds eye view from our home as to what continues to be a daily challenge having the current owners/management as neighbors. I believe that these most recent events, which have been continual since the new ownership of the property took place several years ago, are a detriment not only to our community at large, but are affecting the health and welfare of residences. I know they have affected, negatively so, mine. I continue to seek the support of this council and its members in supporting the vast majority of the citizens directly affected by the lack of cooperation of the ownership of the property mentioned above. I noted at the meeting held on August 5th with the Bureau of Indian Affairs present, that of all those that spoke, and all those that gave of their time slots during the 3 hours + that public comments were made that only 2 citizens were in favor of this project. We as citizens are continuing our efforts to make known our stance in this matter. I respectively submit this document to all of the council members today for the public record. This is not easy to come before this council, or to have addressed those present at the meeting of August 5th — but it is necessary. Thank you for your time. Respectively submitted, nice Leslie 1793 Messina Drive San Jacinto, CA 92581 Stena Copeland 806 Torino Avenue San Jacinto, CA 92583 Public Meeting with Bureau of Indian Affairs Hemet Public Library August 5, 2009 from 5:00 pm to 9:00 pm Good evening to all who are assembled here tonight. My name is Stena Copeland and I reside at 806 Torino Avenue in San Jacinto, California. I am a member of the Save Our Communities Committee, and am here to speak to the subjects of Water Resources and Utilities. I will first speak to the issue of Water Resources. Though the DEIS notes that Water Resources are significant, I feel I must raise some further concerns. Currently, in this area, we are in a state requiring "mandatory conservation," as declared by Eastern Municipal Water District's Board of Directors. Preceding this declaration, the Metropolitan Water District implemented a "Water Supply Allocation Plan" to address state-wide water shortages and court order cuts in water pumping. (EMWD Reports, July 2009) As a result, water is quickly becoming a more and more precious resource. In a statement prepared by Majel M. Russell, who is the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, the tribe is said to have agreed to, quote, "...forebear in its use of a portion of its water rights for the next 50 years." This statement was "key to convincing the three water districts involved to agree to make their own significant contributions." Should the fee -to -trust transfer take place, the size of the amenities proposed by the tribe could possibly overstep the amount of water the tribe states is necessary to energize their project. Over usage by any party sharing rights to this water source would not permit the aquifer to recharge, and would ultimately endanger it. Moreover, a larger number of vehicles are obviously anticipated, as a gas station and parking structures have been proposed. Runoff will introduce larger amounts of pollutants into the water table; and the proposed gas station, with its underground tanks, will also pose a serious threat. Further, I was unable to locate any formal documentation which would protect the interests of the other agencies sharing rights to the water. This is important to note because the fee -to -trust transfer would encompass the aquifer. Should there be any lack of cooperation on the part of the tribe, as has been documented in many local newspaper articles over the years, they could effectively bar access to a valuable water source which is, again, shared. Now I will speak to the topic of utilities. In short, the fee -to -trust transfer would, as in the case of the aquifer, cause existing utility lines to be encompassed by the reservation. Any decision — rash or otherwise - on the part of the tribe to obstruct access to existing utility lines and facilities, for maintenance or repair by utility agencies, would certainly exert a negative impact on its neighboring communities. With the question of tribal cooperation with outside parties and the future of a precious resource firmly in doubt, I ask you to seriously consider revoking the bid to append the land in question to the Soboba reservation. I appreciate your time. Thank you. Public Meeting with Bureau of Indian Affairs Hemet Public Library August 5, 2009 from 5:00 pm to 9:00 pm My name is Eliana Arciniega Ecker and my address is 42070 Granite View Drive San Jacinto, California. I am here to address the issues of Additional Land for Operations, Easier Access, and Land Use Planning from the Scoping Report for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement of the Soboba Horseshoe Grande Project. The Scoping report shows that the following topics are listed as IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE TRIBE AND ITS MEMBERS. (1.2) The Tribe asserts it needs ADDITIONAL LAND FOR OPERATIONS'. The Tribe states that it needs additional land, to build its hotel -casino complex. The tribe affirms there is no land available on its 68652 thousand acre reservation. However, it recently (September 2007) annexed 477 acres known as "the Oaks" to the northern part of its reservation. This land has been used to build a football stadium, a baseball field, a four -field softball complex, a 1,000 person capacity ballpark, locker rooms, a parking lot, water and waste water infrastructure, restrooms, and concessions. According to the Scoping Report, page 27, "the Tribe has utilized most of its usable acreage for community services..." This implies there is still usable land available. The proposed hotel -casino project is stated to use only 35 to 40 acres of land. The existing casino sits on approximately 60 acres3 and although much of the reservation is mountainous, there are large parcels of land adjacent to the casino that could be used to build the resort. The tribe could also use part of "the Oaks" land for the hotel and parking structure. GIS maps show the extensive amount of land around the present casino that could be used for the hotel and parking structure4. Please note that the land in question today is not intended to support tribal housing, government infrastructure, or to resolve local land management conflicts. Instead, it will be used to create a heavily commercialized resort and Class 111 Gaming Facility, which the tribe already has, on land that is zoned for light -residential use. Further, the Tribe has stated it must relocate the current casino since it is within a Flood Zone. However, according to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, both sites are within the same Flood Zone —Flood Zone X5. By proceeding as planned the tribe will incur unnecessary costs and delays without justification, which would prove to be detrimental to the tribes. i Page 5 and 27 of the Scoping report for the DEIS 2 Page 118 Section 3, DEIS a Section 5, Scoping issues of the Soboba Horseshoe Grande Project Appendix 1 n Section 4, Scoping issues of the Soboba Horseshoe Grande Project Appendix 1 s Section 6, Scoping issues of the Soboba Horseshoe Grande Project Appendix 1 6 Section 6, Scoping issues of the Soboba Horseshoe Grande Project Appendix 1 Page 1 of 3 In addition, it is feasible that the Tribe will operate two casinos. During a City Council meeting of June 17, 2004, "Chairman Salgado commented they are comfortable with their compact with the state, presently that means two casinos with a total of 2,000 slots. Their economists would evaluate whether it is better to do one or two (casinos)". As a consequence, impacts to the surrounding areas are magnified if both locations are used for gaming. (1.4) Additionally, the Tribe believes there will be EASIER ACCESS' to the new casino site, rather than the existing site which is less than a mile away. Since there are presently only two -small two-lane roads to the casino and the same two-lane roads are proposed to provide access to the new casino, this premise is unsupported. Severe congestion occurs during special events on those two roads and traffic congestion will be greatly aggravated at the new casino site since the Project will include a hotel resort as well as the casino. This is especially true if the current casino site remains open in any capacity. Community members have requested a traffic light at the intersection of Lake Park and Soboba Road, yet the City has not complied. The communities have asked for a speed monitor from TASIN (Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations) money distributed by the Tribe and it has not been granted nor purchased. Access to the casino is across one two-lane bridge and that access would be the same if the casino is relocated to the Horseshoe Grande property. Easier access would be achieved to the existing casino and reservation if the Tribe followed through on its statement that it was considering a road and bridge to extend Esplanade directly to its existing casino (Press Enterprise, Dec. 31, 2006). Esplanade is a four -lane road and plans have been approved for Ramona Expressway to be widened and reconfigured with easy access to any extension of Esplanade8. This would lessen the 24 hour traffic on Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive that is so troublesome for the surrounding communities. Page 27, of the Scoping Report for the DEIS 8 Section 8, Scoping issues of the Soboba Horseshoe Grande Project Appendix 1 Page 2 of 3 The following topic is listed as: WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES (4.7) LAND USE PLANNING9 The City, in its letter, is concerned about the City's General Plan zoning for the area as low -density residential and open space. It is concerned about land use conflicts of increased negative impacts and regulation of those impacts in the future. It is clearly evident that the Horseshoe Grande property is not zoned for commercial activity based on the City of San Jacinto Zoning Map and Land Use Policy Map from the San Jacinto General Plan10. The first page of the Zoning Map shows plans for a park on the land southwest of the Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park. The second page shows LDR Low Density Residential -2.1 to 5.0 Dwelling Units per acre, for the Horseshoe Grande area, including the land where the proposed hotel and casino complex is proposed. When the Tribe purchased this property, it knew the zoning was not conducive to developing a destination resort, strip malls, and restaurants. The Tribe wants to develop the land as commercial and once it is in trust, there will be no city or county oversight. The residential character of the entire area will be destroyed and changed forever. Scenic views will be forever altered, wildlife will be displaced, and disappear; such is already happening with the coyote. This will be detrimental to the surrounding communities, to the natural environment that are important and vital to this area, and to the City of San Jacinto's General Plan. According to the Scoping Report11, residents stated that these issues are their 3rd and 7th most important concerns. When buying property and moving to an area, residents consider zoning in their surrounding neighborhoods. To change zoning after citizens have bought their homes or moved into an area zoned light -residential is unjust and unethical. Changing from light -residential to dense -commercial cannot be mitigated if the citizens' bought into a quiet, rural residential area. Conclusively, negative impacts and declining property values are consequences of living next to heavily -commercialized areas and these consequences cannot be mitigated. In light of these statements, please recall that once this land is in trust, there is no city or county oversight. In closing, I ask you to oppose the Fee to Trust request for the Soboba Horseshoe Grande Project. Thank you for your time and attention. 9 Page 19, of the Scoping report for the DEIS 1° Section 44, Scoping issues of the Soboba Horseshoe Grande Project Appendix 1 11 Page 11, of the Scoping report for the DEIS Page 3 of 3 LAkE pARk soboba springs 1055-B Ortega Way, Placentia, CA 92870 (714) 632-1646 Fax (714) 632-5305 January 18, 2008 Ms. Amy Dutschke Acting Regional Director, Pacific Regional Office — Bureau of Indian Affairs, 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, California, 95825 RE: Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians — Proposed HoteUCasino Project, EIS Dear Ms. Dutschke: We, the owners of Soboba Springs Mobile Estates, located at 2230 Lake Park Drive, San Jacinto, CA 92583, wish to express our concerns for the annexation of 535 acres of land which would totally surround our Community within Tribal land. Soboba Springs Mobile Estates consists of 254 mobile homesites with a population of over 400 Senior Citizens. The Community was first constructed in 1970 and is known to be one of the finest Manufactured Home Communities in the Hemet Valley. The average age of the Homeowners in Soboba Springs Mobile Estates is 75 years, with 15 homeowners over 90 plus years of age. Our Community has elaborate recreation facilities, a reflection lake, driving range and a putting course, all providing an unparalleled lifestyle for our active Seniors. We have seen only sketchy uncommitted plans of the Tribe's intended development. It is very difficult to visualize the Tribe's proposal without an adequate project description in an EIS that includes, without limitation, conceptual plans showing buildings, traffic circulation, land use planning and landscaping buffering. Consideration for annexation of the 535 acres should include detailed plans of the proposed development, normally required by cities and counties. The documentation provided at the Public Scoping Meeting by the Tribe was grossly insufficient to achieve a conclusive environmental review and comment. You should also know that in 1981 and 1982 EPM (Soboba Springs Mobile Estates — "Owners") and Daon Corporation entered into "Easement Agreements", which were recorded on December 31, 1981 and February 5, 1982 in Riverside County. The easement agreements allowed for a secondary ingress and egress, land for RV storage and a 10' perimeter strip, on the (then) Daon Property, which is adjacent to Soboba Springs Mobile Estates\ (exhibits are attached). These easements are now the obligation of the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, as they now hold land title. The property impacted by these easements cannot be taken into trust for the Tribe under applicable law, including, without limitation, 25 C.F.R. 151.13 until these title restrictions are addressed through negotiations by the Tribe and BIA with us. It is our understanding that Class III gaming is generally prohibited on land acquired and placed into trust for the Tribe after October 17, 1988 , according to 25 U.S.C. Section 2719 of IGRA. We believe the Tribe has other land or locations where an operation of this size would have less impact on the long established neighboring residential community as a whole. We are also especially concerned that the Tribe's proposed expansion plan calls for a "Wastewater Treatment Plant", however, the Tribe has not shown the proposed location for the plant. Through discussion, it is now our understanding the proposed placement is to border our property on the Southwest of Soboba Springs Mobile Estates. A "Wastewater Treatment Plant" bordering our "Residential Community" would be a disaster. The prevailing winds would constantly bring unavoidable odors to this Senior Community. There must be other land available for this Wastewater Treatment Plant or the possibility of tying the Tribe's waste treatment into the existing Lake Hemet Municipal Water District for their • Page 2 September 3, 2009 associated needs. We ask that this alternative and all other options be analyzed as alternatives to the construction of an on - site waste treatment plant by the Tribe. Public Safety, where should we begin? In the last month alone there have been three front page articles of high speed chases with bullets flying (see the attached articles). There has been a history of small arms fire coming from the reservation. Bullets being shot into the air have on many occasions landed within the Soboba Springs Mobile Estates. Fortunately to date, no one has been injured by the stray bullets. The Fire Department will not even enter the Soboba Reservation without a Sherriff's escort (see the enclosed articles). Traffic is unbearable during Casino Special Events even without the proposed expansion. Our residents have been delayed over two hours, due to the roads being over taxed. There are no allowances for law enforcement and emergency services during these traffic jams. Emergency vehicles have been known to drive off the roadways to bypass jammed traffic leading to the casino. This is an existing detriment to our community. Traffic studies must take into account traffic volumes during special events. What will the plans be for widening the existing roads, traffic controls and traffic management? Does the Tribe have an adequate evacuation plan in the event of an emergency? Who will be responsible for these expanded problems which are not currently being taken seriously? We are a Senior Community who rely on "Emergency Medical Technicians" on a regular basis. The delays for emergency equipment even today are life threatening without the expansion of the proposed project. We are concerned that without adequate mitigation the proposed casino expansion will result in devastating consequences for the area. Public safety, traffic, air pollution, noise, overpowering lighting and signage, view restrictions, unlimited hours of operation, residential to commercial buffering, utilities, and sanitation are all issues of major concern. The residents of Soboba Springs Mobile Estates choose their homes for the peace and tranquility of the rural residential setting. Most have lived in the city and were impacted by the increasing traffic, pollution, noise and lighting accordingly. They were lured to Soboba Springs by the beautiful mountains and lush landscape. Erecting a hotel right outside of the Park will diminish the view and change the atmosphere. Currently, the Soboba Casino has four spot lights that permeate the sky all evening, compromising those lost starry night sky's. Will the Tribe continue to use such lighting next door or will the plan be conducive to their neighbors by restricting the pending operation to localized lighting on the facility. For example, outdoor concerts have been routinely held on the Soboba Reservation. Our community has been affected by noise, traffic and debris thrown from cars as they leave the reservation. If this proposal is approved will this bring these venues to our back door without consideration? In past years our residents have been impacted by decisions made by Tribal members, i.e., holding Day/Night racing on a dirt bike track radiating the surroundings with the constant reverberation of roaring motorcycles. Our expressed concerns to the Tribe Council were met with, "it is out of our control" as though the parcel was not within tribal control. Several months later, after a number of related injuries occurred, and tragically a death, this activity was finally stopped by the Tribe. History has not demonstrated confidence that our issues will be taken seriously by the Tribe. If the additional land is taken into trust by the BIA for the Tribe, we anticipate loss of local governmental control, which we know looks out for such property rights and environmental issues. The land in question is now under the domain of the City of San Jacinto with General Plans, Zoning Laws, Ordnances and Building Codes along with State law all designed to regulate development and construction. What restrictions will govern and mitigate the proposed development by the Tribe under Federal law if this land is taken into trust. Where is the oversight? By taking the desired additional land into trust, we foresee the Tribe would be exempt from the current local zoning and will no longer be subject to the City's General Plan. The residential nature of this existing area would be overwhelmed by the proposed congestion that comes with a large scale casino and hotel operation, encompassing our quiet community within a non -conducive commercial activity. If unmitigated, the residential character will be lost forever. The Tribe should agree to subject itself to the City of San Jacinto's local land use process for development standards and building codes enforcement for the expansion project. This is done in other local communities, such as by the Agua Caliente Band in the City of Palm Springs. Further, the Tribe should agree to reasonable building design and height of all buildings, and agree to be subject to local planning oversight by the City, which has and should maintain the compatibility of the proposed expansion. Soboba Springs Mobile Estates has been protected by such ordinances which govern zoning, planning and respective set -backs for the adjacent properties. • Page 3 September 3, 2009 If additional lands are taken into trust for the Tribe and the hotel and casino project begins, Soboba Springs' residents will be burdened by corresponding noise, dust and vibration and many other adverse impacts during the construction of the project. The hours of operation and construction therefore need to be limited to reasonable hours and measures must be required to be taken by the Tribe to mitigate construction nuisances. What impact is this annexation and proposed project going to have on local services? We already know the Fire Department and Paramedics will not enter the reservation without a police escort. The Tribe does not currently have a contract for police services; they are using their own private security guards (and not sworn peace officers that are certified under State law, P.O.S.T.). The Tribe should be required to hire a sufficient number of sworn peace officers that are certified under State law, P.O.S.T, to ensure that public safety needs are adequately met if the Tribe's expansion project is approved by the BIA. Currently our streets are maintained by the City of San Jacinto, so who will be responsible for maintaining Lake Park Drive? What impact will a project of this caliber have on our already burdened utility companies (brown outs)? Again, these are concerns that must be addressed in the EIS. One mitigation measure we feel should be fully analyzed in the EIS is placing an adequate "buffer zone" around our mobilehome park proportionate to the proposed development. In addition to this buffer zone, we request that the Tribe finish the block wall around the Community with an additional exit for emergency evacuation, in accordance with our easement agreements. These measures will give our Community a little relief from the intensity of the new casino and the (yet to be fully disclosed) development of the property immediately surrounding our mobilehome community. Economics always comes into play, especially when combinations of intense uses are imposed upon residential properties. It becomes quite clear that the proposed uses of the land surrounding our mobilehome community and the homes therein will be dramatically impacted, particularly if strong mitigation measures are not imposed. Our residents have had the benefit of the quiet enjoyment of this private community for 35 plus years. Most have placed their nest egg in their homes. They have justified concerns that the proposed project will deflate their property values. We ask the committee to consider the impact this proposed project will have on the property values in the neighboring residential properties. Please understand we do not want to stand in the way of the Tribe's progress; however, the BIA must put sufficient mitigation measures in place so that our Homeowners can in fact coexist with the impacts of the proposed Tribal uses, which go way beyond the nonn. We have in the past enjoyed good relations with the Tribe and stand ready to work with them and the BIA to accomplish these goals. Finally, we are most concerned about the governmental authority and accountability the Tribe will have towards us and other surrounding neighbors, after the BIA completes it review through this process. Therefore, we hope to have discussions with the BIA and the City in the near future, besides the Tribe, to best address our concerns. Thank you for your time and consideration in evaluating our aforementioned concerns. Sincerely, Edwin J. Evan Managinglember EPM Zimmer Company, L.L.C. General Partner, Soboba Springs Mobile Estates ATTACHMENTS: EASEMENT AGREEMENT, PERIMETER STRIP AGREEMENT, FOUR (4) NEWS ARTICLES Rebuttal to Mayor Stubblefield Mayor Stubblefield, our council member on the Tribal Committee, appears to have misinterpreted my remarks in the Press Enterprise. If he had read it carefully, he would have noted that my vote was the result of lack of information furnished by his Committee to the Council at large. At the special meeting on August 5, 2009, just prior to the presentation to the BIA, Mayor Stubblefield offered a prepared presentation that was to be voted on by the Council. It seems that the Tribal Subcommittee of two members had made a unilateral decision to respond to the BIA, based on a review of the information obtained from the City Staff review on July 22, 2009. That review was not forwarded to the other Council Members prior to the request for a vote. At that meeting, a councilman requested a 5-0 vote without any input or questioning of the information contained in the presentation. To be told that I must vote a certain way based on the desires of two Council members is a "capricious" whim, and has no place in a representative form of city government. I was seated in December, 2008, and was briefed on the plans of the Soboba Tribe by the City Attorney. His briefing was mainly a review of the proposal for the use of the land that the Tribe had purchased. As I noted in my remarks to the newspaper, no other information, recordings, or reports, were submitted to the Council by the Tribal Subcommittee regarding their fact finding, even though they have enumerated a number of meetings on their Agenda item tonight. They have taken the attitude that they, and not the Council as a body, should prepare a course of action, without direction from the Council. I am very mindful of the concerns of the residents located in and adjacent to the proposed addition to the "Trust" land. I have reviewed the BIA DEIS report and have a number of questions and lingering concerns regarding that report, but I also know how the BIA works, and we must consider the obligations to the whole community to support legal action through an injunction or law suit, if the decision is not in the best interest of the community. ve Di Me FACT SHEET Since my city council colleague has chosen to attack my opinion as an agenda item on September, 3, 2009, regarding the "Fee to Trust" project of the Soboba Tribe. I am compelled to respond. First I would like to be sure all, including my colleague, understand the definition of "capricious," which is to act impulsively. I believe, after a presentation of the FACTS, it will be clear that my colleagues have acted capriciously, by requesting a rubber stamp vote of a Sub Committee's unilateral decision. The opposition opinion piece would have you to believe there has been a 300% increase in calls for public safety services on the reservation. Supposedly this is information presented to the city by law enforcement personnel for 2004 through 2008. I have been on the council since 12/2008 and have never received this information. I have been told in response to my request for such information, "it is being gathered." So where did the Mayor obtain the information on which he bases his comments? PUBLIC SAFETY The city's annual reports and budget narrative have indicated its expectation of increased criminal activity based on its own city approved growth. It indicated in the annual report 2005/2006 a 2.8% increase, and as recently as the 2008/2009 Budget, stated the crime rate is down 16%. A review of the DEIS for the Soboba Tribe expansion had a number of important references (see DEIS excerpts): Section 5 — Page 28 — No mitigation measures required for law enforcement. Section 3 — Pages 134 through 138 — Reflected an analysis of the crime rates for 2005, including surrounding cities (Banning, Beaumont, Hemet and San Jacinto), surprisingly seemed to exceed those of the county overall, the state, and almost higher overall nationally. There was also a chart on the service calls to the reservation and casino, as provided by the Riverside County Sheriffs Department. Those stats for 2006, 2007, and through May, 2008 showed that priority calls (life -threatening and crimes in progress), totaled 13 for the reservation and 18 for the casino. In other categories, as well as priority calls, there was actually a decline. The May 2008 incidents (occurring on a REMOTE location on the reservation), according to the Press Enterprise, caused the Fire Department to request police escorts to the reservation. Let us not forget that in the city the Fire Department stages down the street, on such calls, until the police make the area safe for them. This is a standard procedure for safety, no matter where the response is needed. CITIZEN REPRESENTATION "Improving quality and quantity of jobs in the community" was listed as the top citizen concern, and was the number one pick for the city to improve in the city's own survey conducted in April, 2009. If we as a council are not going to use the survey as a tool for direction, then why was $ 17,000 wasted to conduct it? I noticed that my colleague included a copy of one letter to the city from a citizen in opposition, and conveniently ignored the one who wrote a letter to the editor in support of jobs for the community. (Copy attached) LEGAL COSTS Thus far the taxpayers have paid legal costs that have exceeded $ 80,000.00 in less than two years dealing with this issue. How much more do the residents of the city have to pay if the city enters into litigation? The matter never came before the full city council in an open session until 8/5/09, when my colleagues were pressing me to vote in opposition without the benefit of any factual information to support their position. The only open public session that the Tribal Subcommittee sought public inclusion was in May, 2009 with the retirement community of Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park by conducting their meeting in the park. What other town hall meetings were held seeking input from the total community? STAFF REPORT BY CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY It would be too time consuming to begin to address all the well -worded statements in the report to create the illusion they desire. The BIA has acknowledged the comments and filed them with their records. I will simply take one item to demonstrate. The seven page comment letter of 1/17/08. What I learned from that letter regarding their alleged issue on public safety lacked any statistics and merely referenced an article by the Press Enterprise. The city manager has infoiined _ale that the issue of concern is that of "community isolation." The point is, public safety service calls are a fact of life that we all accept. If we had the numbers on the casino attendance versus the calls for service the rate per 100,000 would actually be minimal, and most likely be far less than the city statistics shown on page 3-135 of the DEIS, but you don't see the tribe asking to keep the San Jacinto citizens out of their area. Using that same chart, Hemet has an excessive arson rate, but no one is clamoring for a ban on the sale of matches. Frankly, the stats show that cities far exceed the county rural rates, it is just a part of urban living. Seems the stats indicate it is more dangerous to live in San Jacinto than on the reservation. Therefore, my concern has been, and will continue to be, the overall aspects of the proposal related to public safety, traffic impact, and jobs creation for the benefit of the entire community, and the Soboba Tribe expansion should not be dismissed without a full, honest, and accurate review of the issues by the entire community and the city council. It is the responsibility of the City Council, as a body, to review all available factual data regarding any project or matter that comes before it, and direct the Staff to carry out its informed directions. Don't block casino, jobs, prosperity I Local Views I PE.com I Southern California News I ... Page 1 of 1 Search PE.com ' s¢arch WEE SEARCH by v6,1400, Don't block casino, jobs, prosperity III p.m iPI 10 LISTEN 10 SIOR - — Download story po_dcast 10:00 PM PDT on Sunday, August 23, 2009 By DAN VIESCAS ,PRESS' I recently read an article in The Press -Enterprise ("Residents at odds over casino issues," Aug. 6) about the proposed building of a new casino and hotel in San Jacinto. The story related how a handful of seniors in a senior community near the proposed casino and hotel site complained that the project would inconvenience them by adding more traffic and noise to their area. I see that the phrase "not in my backyard" is still alive and well. I'm astonished at the selfishness of some people in a community where unemployment is so high and no real industry exists to support the number of people needing jobs. I often think of people who move into small towns like San Jacinto and oppose growth and progress. This is an area where affordable housing attracts young families and, yes, older folks as well. To simply turn ones head from that is wrong. Look around and you'll see all the new housing developments that have sprouted in just the past two years. Although the housing industry is going through a tough time right now, it will come back and this town will continue to grow -- like it or not. I can't remember or even think of a time when anyone opposed building a senior/55-plus community. A great number of these are here in San Jacinto, aren't they? But, some of these seniors feel they have a right to stop anything that might change the status quo. When I heard of the possibility of a new casino and hotel being built here in San Jacinto, I thought of all the jobs that would be created by the construction phase and how, when the project is completed, money would flow into the town, not to mention the jobs that would be created. An economic boost would come not just from the casino and hotel. but from the fact that with a bigger and better facility comes bigger and better events, which spur more revenue and draw interest from outside developers. I remember growing up in and around Santa Ana, how people bucked at the thought of becoming a real town. Yet you can't stop progress. Those who think they can are fooling themselves. As for those in the not -in -my -backyard group, I would wager that on any given day, you could find many of them in the Soboba Casino seated at the slots. These are just my thoughts. And guess what? I am a senior citizen and I live in San Jacinto. Dan Viescas is a resident of San Jacinto. http://www.pe.com/localnews/opinion/localviews/stories/PE_OpEd_Opinion_S_op_24_vies... 08/29/09 Section 3.0 Description Of Affected Environment The Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) provides natural gas services, and serves 19.8 million customers through 5.6 million gas meters covering 23,000 square -miles of service area (SCGC 2006). Out-of-state natural gas basins supply most of the natural gas used in California. In 2003, 42 percent of the natural gas supply originated in basins located in the southwestern United States, 26 percent was from Canada, 14 percent was from the Rocky Mountain region, and 18 percent was from basins located within California (City of Santa Clarita 2008). SCGC receives natural gas from the El Paso Pipeline and the Transwestern Pipeline. The El Paso Pipeline delivers natural gas from the Cities of Topock and Ehrenberg, Arizona to SCGC receiving pipelines with respective intrastate receipt capacities of 540 and 1,210 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d). The Transwestern Pipeline delivers natural gas from Topock, Arizona and Needles, California to SCGC receiving pipelines with respective intrastate receipt capacities of 50 and 750 MMcf/d (U.S. Department of Energy 2001). The natural gas is then delivered to local transmission and distribution pipeline systems or to natural gas storage fields. TELEPHONE SERVICES Verizon provides all basic telecommunications services, including cellular communications, to the Project Site. Verizon currently has above ground phone lines, which provide service to the Project Site. Verizon provides service for local toll calls and long distance service. Area residents also have the option of long-distance service from a wide variety of companies that include MCI, Sprint, and AT&T. LAW ENFORCEMENT This section describes the law enforcement situation and measures on the Project Site and the Reservation. First, an overview of crime in the Project Site and surrounding area, as well as on the Reservation is presented. Then, a discussion of crime associated with casinos is provided based on review of available literature. Finally, the current law enforcement arrangements between the Tribe and relevant agencies are discussed. Incidence of Crime Based on data provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Tables 3-30 and 3-31 show the crime rates in 2005 per 100,000 people in the major cities in the vicinity of the Project Site, Riverside County, the State of California, and the nation. It appears that the incidence of most of the crime in the four cities is higher than that of the county. Hemet and San Jacinto lead the other areas in larceny/theft, while Banning and Hemet have the highest rates of burglary. May 2009 3-134 Soboba Band OfLuiseno Indians Draft EIS Section 3.0 Description Of Affected Environment TABLE 3-30 CRIME RATES PER 100,000 PEOPLE (2005) Area Murder/ Rape Robbery Aggravated Burglary Larceny/ Vehicle Arson Manslaughter Assault Theft Theft San Jacinto Hemet Banning Beaumont Riverside County California U.S. 14.2 28.3 141.7 283.4 1,165.5 2,316.8 846.6 0.0 4.5 28.4 210.4 325.3 1,358.1 2,899.8 844.7 20.9 0.0 38.1 138.5 488.3 1,766.2 1,800.8 481.4 0.0 5.5 21.9 93.2 170.0 674.5 2,221.0 597.8 5.5 2.0 6.0 21.8 82.5 200.3 429.8 204.6 3.6 6.9 26.0 176.1 317.3 693.3 1,916.5 712.8 0.0 5.6 31.7 140.7 291.1 726.7 2,286.3 416.7 0.0 Source: Extrapolated from data by U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reporting Program, "Crime in the United States 2005 -Tables 4, 8, and 10," http://www.fbi.qov/ucr/05cius/about/index.html, accessed August 1, 2007. 3,000.0 2,500.0 0 r2 2,000.0 0 1,500.0 rr 1,000.0 c.� 500.0 0.0 TABLE 3-31 CRIME RATES PER 100,000 PEOPLE (2005) rya ..ee ae•' <<oO. o�� Po'q Category of Crime i i �\-1., row 'row o� I 0 © San Jacinto El Hemet O Banning O Beaumont is Riverside County o California Source: Developed from data by U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reporting Program, "Crime in the United States 2005 -Tables 4, 8, and 10," http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/about/index.html, accessed August 1, 2007. Information compiled by the Riverside County Sheriffs Department (RCSD) is used to assess the incidence of crime on the Reservation. According to these data, the rate of reported crime on the May 2009 3-135 Soboba Band OfLuiseno Indians Draft EIS Section 3.0 Description Of Affected Environment Reservation has generally decreased over the past two years. A review of reported crime shows that the number of calls requesting service by law enforcement agencies dropped from 633 to 521 overall between 2006 and 2007. Table 3-32 shows the number of calls requesting law enforcement service to the Reservation and the existing casino in 2006, 2007, and for the first 5 months of 2008. Calls are categorized according to priority. Priority lA and Priority 1 calls involve life -threatening or potentially life -threatening situations, or are for crimes in progress. TABLE 3-32 CALLS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE TO THE RESERVATION AND EXISTING CASINO, 2006 THROUGH MAY 2008 Priority Number of Calls Number of Number of (2006) Calls (2007) Calls yJ2008)ry Reservation lA 1 2 3 4 0 2 2 1 2 6 83 51 81 108 65 49 32 31 26 5 0 0 0 Subtotal Reservation 224 152 164 Existing Casino IA 1 2 3 4 5 Subtotal Existing Casino 4 5 2 1 6 0 126 117 55 173 148 40 105 89 25 0 4 0 409 369 122 Total 633 521 286 Sources: Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Information Services Bureau, June 27, 2008, "Calls for Service to the Soboba Indian Reservation (Not including the Soboba Casino) Calendar Years 2006, 2007, and 2008 (Year to date, January -May)." Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Information Services Bureau, June 27, 2008, "Calls for Service to Soboba Casino, 23333 Soboba Rd., San Jacinto 92883, Calendar Years 2006, 2007, and 2008 (Year to date, January -May)." May 2009 3-136 Soboba Band Of Luiseno Indians Draft EIS Section 3.0 Description Of Affected Environment Law Enforcement on the Project Site and Reservation Under Public Law 83-280 (see Section 2.1.1, Security and Law Enforcement, for a discussion of PL 280), the RCSD and California Highway Patrol (CHP) are responsible for responding to emergencies on the Reservation. Law enforcement services to both the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the Project Site are also provided by RCSD. Since 2004, the City of San Jacinto has contracted with RCSD to provide law enforcement services for San Jacinto, including the incorporated portion of the Project Site. The RCSD station that services San Jacinto is located at 160 West 6th Street in San Jacinto. Riverside County's budget for fiscal year 2007-08 allocates funds for 1,879 sworn and non -sworn patrol personnel. Presently there are 1,879 funded and 2,104 filled deputies. RCSD seeks to maintain a ratio of 1.2 deputies per 1,000 residents. Based on the 2007 Riverside County population of 2,031,625, RCSD is required to have 2,438 deputies, illustrating that RCSD is operating at approximately 14 percent under capacity. RCSD would have to add 334 positions to operate at the recommended service level of 1.2 deputies per 1,000 residents. The Hemet Station, located at 43950 Acacia Avenue, has allotted 50 sworn deputy/corporal positions (Riverside County, 2006), along with one captain, one lieutenant, and eight sergeants. This station services and is the closest station to the Reservation and Project Site, with a response time of three to five minutes to the Project Site for high priority calls (City of San Jacinto Police Department, July 20, 2007). The RCSD does not have a defined response time goal; however, average response times for the Hemet Station in fiscal year 2004-2005 were 10.88 minutes for priority one calls, 15.24 minutes for priority two calls, and 19.70 minutes for priority three calls.50 The CHP also responds to calls on the Reservation, with the nearest CHP station being the San Gorgonio Pass (Station 655) in Beaumont, California, located approximately 12 miles north of the Project Site. Soboba Casino security and Tribal security staff members also provide surveillance on the Reservation as needed. The Tribe and RCSD have recently finalized an agreement to improve the law enforcement conditions on the Reservation and develop a better working relationship between the two entities following the tensions raised between them due to recent law enforcement deployments on the Reservation.51 The agreement is the result of three meetings between the Tribe and RCSD held 50 Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission, September 2006, "Draft Municipal Service Review for the Central Valleys, the Pass Area, and Southwestern Riverside County Areas," prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., Irvine, California. 51 While crime rates are generally falling on the Reservation, two isolated incidents recently occurred within its boundaries: On May 8, 2008, Riverside County Sheriffs Department deputies shot and killed Eli Morillo, a 26-year-old Soboba Tribal member, after the officers reportedly had gone to investigate gunfire on a remote part of the Reservation and were fired upon. According to authorities, five deputies fired in the shooting. Four days later, deputies shot and killed Joseph Arres, 36, and May 2009 3-137 Soboba Band OfLuisen"o Indians Draft EIS Section 3.0 Description Of Affected Environment in May and June of 2008. The Community Relations Service of the United States Department of Justice facilitated the meetings, which also included representatives of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and the Office of Congressman Jerry Lewis. The following list summarizes the objectives of the agreement: • The agreement is to enhance the provision of public safety services to the Reservation through improving communication, coordination, and collaboration between the two parties. • The two entities agree to establish permanent points of contact, local Departmental and Countywide Tribal liaisons, and coordinated command posts for critical incident response. • The two parties agree to develop cultural training for Departmental personnel, as well as training in law enforcement procedures, crime prevention, and other areas for Tribal personnel. In addition, the two parties agree to develop contingency plans for managing extended displacement of Reservation residents because of closures required in situations of disasters and critical incidents, and to coordinate with other public safety agencies that serve the Reservation to examine ways for improving delivery of other public safety services, such as fire, medical emergencies, and disaster response. FIRE PROTECTION The Riverside County Fire Department and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) provide fire protection and emergency response to the Project Site and surrounding area.52 Fire stations in California can have a mix of State, County, contract City, or volunteer -staffed equipment. All stations in the area of the Project Site are dispatched by the CDF/Riverside County Fire Department Perris Emergency Command Center (ECC) and are part of the "Integrated Fire Protection System," under contract with California.53 Therefore, fire Tamara Angela Hurtado, 29, again in an isolated section of the Reservation in the foothills of the San Jacinto Mountains. According to authorities, the deputies were responding to 911 callers who reported that the Tribe's security booth, which controls access to the Reservation, had been hit by gunfire. The two Tribal members were shot multiple times by SWAT officers, who said they had been fired upon by one of the two. Authorities said that nine deputies fired their weapons in that incident. Source: The Press -Enterprise (Riverside, California), May 30, 2008. 52 In response to a series of violent incidents in December 2007, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) required its rescue crews to wait for an escort from the Riverside County Sheriffs Department before responding to emergency calls on the Reservation. The policy was lifted within a few weeks. Two isolated incidents on the Reservation in May 2008 caused CDF to temporarily reinstate the policy; however, the policy was reversed on June 13, 2008. Currently, CDF rescue crews do not require an escort to respond to emergency calls to the Reservation. Source: The Press -Enterprise (Riverside, California), June 13, 2008. 53 Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission, September 2006, "Draft Municipal Service Review for the Central Valleys, the Pass Area, and Southwestern Riverside County Areas," prepared May 2009 3-138 Soboba Band OfLuiseno Indians Draft EIS Casino Crimes - Soboba Written and Non Written Crimes: Soboba Date range for each year. Dec 1 - Nov 30 (Casino opened in 1995; data not available prior to 1999) 1999-2000 2000-2001 2007-2008 Vehicle Theft Drunk in Public Assault DUI Fraud Narcotics Rape Theft 23 9 33 0 8 36 1 14 23 0.0% 5 -44.4% 24 -27.3% 0 N/A 8 0.0% 33 -8.3% 0-100.0% 28 100.0% 28 34 36 17 3 37 2 42 21.7% 277.8% 9.1% N/A -62.5% 2.8% 100.0% 200.0% Crimes: Soboba Date range for each year. Dec 1 - Nov 30 (Casino opened in 1995; data not available prior to 1999) 1999-2000 2000-2001 2007-2008 asin tna no Vehicle Theft Drunk in Public Assault DUI Fraud Narcotics Rape Theft 12 5 9 0 7 10 0 9 11 4 24 0 1 26 1 5 11 4 10 0 5 24 0 21 12 1 14 0 3 9 0 7 18 26 20 1 2 23 1 24 10 8 16 16 1 14 1 18 Crimes: Soboba Date range for each year: Dec 1 - Nov 30 (Casino opened in 1995; data not available prior to 1999) 1999-2000 2000-2001 2007-2008 Casino Non -Casino 52 72 41.9% 58.1% 75 46 62.0% 38.0% 115 84 57.8% 42.2% Grant# 100.0% ?0.0% Calls for Service: Soboba Date range for each year: Dec 1 - Nov 30 (Casino opened in 1995; data not available prior to 1999) Casino 157 34.89% 181 37.24% 283 37.38% 621 36.68% Non -Casino 293 65.11% 305 62.76% 474 62.62% 1,072 63.32% 01 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1999-2000 Calls for Service ®Casino 0 Non -Casino 2000-2001 2007-2008 Riverside County Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee (CBC) Fi SO2 City of San Jacinto Funds completion of the design for the Ramona Expressway Road Improvement Project, including the reconstruction and minor widening of Ramona Expressway from State Street to Lake Park/Main Street. $59,882 Soboba SO3 City of San Jacinto Funds Police Department services related to casino incidents (based on 4% of Police Department operations budget). $160,123 Soboba SO4 City of San Jacinto Funds Fire Department services addressing casino related needs (6.25% of Fire Department contract budget). $56,137 Soboba SO8 Riverside County Sheriffs Department Funds the addition of three Sheriffs Deputies and a fully equipped 4X4 patrol vehicle. $276,172 Soboba TW1 ,n c ht�r° City of Indio Funds the purchase of up to 19 new high-pressure Self Contained Breathing Apparatus with a 50% larger cylinder capacity. $78,910 Twenty -Nine Palms TW2 City of Coachella Funds the upgrade of a firefighter position to a paramedic position on each shift; increase police patrol during peak periods (i.e., Friday and Saturday nights). $78,910 Twenty -Nine Palms TW4 Riverside County District Attorneys Office Provides a contribution toward the investigation and prosecution of crimes connected to or affecting casinos. $38,434 Twenty -Nine Palms Total of Funded Projects $10,422,440 4 FY 2004/05 SB 621 Grant Awards Identifier Jurisdiction Project Requested Funding Awarded Funding FY 03/04 MYP? * New MYP? * ITCA S08 County Sheriffs Department Deputy Sheriff positions and equipment/overhead $2,890,716 $276,172 Yes, this is the second year of a five year funding commitment. Soboba SO1-05 City of San Jacinto Road Improvements $500,000 $68,380 Soboba S02-05 City of Hemet Erect a Bridge $1,200,000 $111,894 Soboba S03-05 County Fire Department Heavy Rescue Project $1,510,240 $34,190 Soboba SO4-05 County Transportation Dept. Road Improvements $2,200,000 $34,190 Soboba S05-05 City of San Jacinto Fire Department Services $500,000 $174,942 Soboba $699,767 * Multi -Year Project PE01-06 County District Attorney Tribal Prosecution Unit to investigate and prosecute crimes connected to Tribal gaming. Law Enforcement $1,735,878 $382,955 PE02-06 County Sheriff's Department Addition of Sheriff's Deputies, including equipment/overhead Law Enforcement $2,922,899 $553,075 PE08-06 City of Temecula Closed circuit TV cameras, including a fiber optic backbone, to assist with traffic monitoring adjacent to the casino and reservation. Other - traffic monitoring $395,000 $183,679 PE09-06 City of Temecula Construction of a second right turn lane from Highway 79 south- east bound to southbound, and associated land acquisition. Roads $400,000 $400,000 Total Pechanga 20% Non -Nexus SDF Paying Tribe Grants $1,519,708.67 Soboba - Soboba Casino 60% Nexus Grant Applications Identifier Jurisdiction roject Title Priority Category Funding Requested Funding Awarded SO1-06 City of San Jacinto Purchase and Installation of a plymovent system for the new fire station which will serve the western portion of San Jacinto, including roads traveled by Soboba patrons. Fire Services $85,000 $85,000 SO2-06 City of San Jacinto Road maintenance, including: crack sealing, slurry sealing and re -striping all lines for: Soboba Road, Lake Park Drive, Main Street and Ramona Expressway. Roads $339,900 $339,900 S03-06 City of San Jacinto increase the square footage cf the San Jacinto Police Station by 2.000 square feet to accommodate increased staffing. Law Enforcement $310.455 $310.455 804'06 County Fire Department Purchase ofFirefighter personal protective equipment (^tumout" gear). Fire Services $78.000 $78.000 Total SoboboGOY6Nexus Grants $813.355.00 Sobobo-SoboboCosino 20% Non -Nexus SDF Paying Grants Identifier Jurisdiction Pr6iect Title Priority Cateaory Awarded Requested Funding County Contributitoward on the upgrade - Transportation ofState Route 7Qfrom 1-15hoI- S05-00 Deportment 10. Roads $2.200.000 $137.597 Tribal Prosecution Unit Uo County District investigate and prosecute crimes S00-06 Attorney connected hoTribal gaming. Law Enforcement $1.099.403 $200.000 Total Soboba 20% Non -Nexus, SDF Paying Tribe Grants $337,596.84 Twenty -Nine Palms ' Spotlight 29Casino 60% Nexus Grant Application Identifier Jurisdiction Proiect Title Priority Funding Category Requested FundingAwarded ' Twenty -Nine Palms - Spotlight 28 Casino Riverside County Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee FY 2006/07 SB 621 Grant Awards FY 2006/07 Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians - Soboba Casino 60% Nexus - Awarded Grant Projects Identii er' Jurisdiction ProjectDescrioton Priority Cate Funding Reqeste Funding SO1-07 City of San Jacinto Upgrade emergency medical services from Basic Level Service (BLS) to Advanced Level Service (ALS) at two City Fire Stations. Also, purchase extrication equipment for the new Fire Station. Fire 1 Emergency Medical Services $95,000 $90,000 SO2-07 City of San Jacinto Road maintenance, including: asphalt patching, crack sealing, slurry sealing and re -striping all lines for: Ramona Expressway, Esplanade Ave., Soboba Road, and Mountain Ave. Roads $300,000 $264,336.45 SO3-07 County Fire Department Fund a percentage of a Firescope Type I Heavy Rescue Unit. Fire / Emergency Medical Services $42,256 $42,000 SO4-07 City of Hemet Fund 5 percent of environmental, design and construction of Cawston Ave. Roads $306,000 $205,415.89 Total Soboba 60% Nexus Grants $601,752.34 Riverside County Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee FY 2006/07 SB 621 Grant Awards FY 2006/07 Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians - Soboba Casino 20% Non -Nexus SDF Paying Tribe - Awarded Grant Projects Identifier urisdiction Project Descrbt o Priority fl tannnr Funding ao„ra�ro.i Funding SO4-07 City of Hemet Fund 5 percent of environmental, design and construction of Cawston Ave. Roads $306,000 $100,584.11 SO5-07 County District Attorney Fund a portion of the Tribal Prosecution Unit, which investigates and prosecutes crimes connected to Tribal gaming. Law Enforcement $1,727,590 $100,000 Total Soboba 20% Non -Nexus, SDF Paying Tribe Grants $200,584.11 Riverside County Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee FY 2008/09 AB 158 Sponsored Grant Applications for Consideration FY 2008/09 Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians - Soboba Casino 60% Nexus - Sponsored Grant Applications Identifier urisdictior Project Des Priority C atannnr Funding Ran toc�+arl Funding e `fl,a Funding Funding SO1-09 City of San Jacinto ,..--.- Fund 12 percent of the Ramona Expressway rehabilitation project, from State Street to Lake Park Drive _. �..- -.., Roads ...,..../.. v... $238,671 .:.v t+vt,.av, GU $238,671 , SGVVttlIttO!IUGU $238,671 P\WQIUCU $238,671 SO2-09 City of Hemet Fund 35 percent of Mountain Avenue paving project (approximately one mile). Roads $390,553 $390,553.00 $390,553 $390,553 SO4-09 County Transportation Department Contribution toward the realignment and widening of SR 79 from 1-15 to 1-10. Roads $238,671 $238,671.00 $238,671.07 $238,671.07 Total Soboba 60% Nexus Grants $867,895.00 $867,895.07 $867,895.07 Additional sponsorship anticipated. Riverside County Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee FY 2008/09 AB 158 Sponsored Grant Applications for Consideration FY 2008/09 Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians - Soboba Casino 20% Non -Nexus SDF Paying Tribe - Sponsored Grant Applications ldentifiei Jurisdiction Project Des Priority r t Funding Funding Funding Funding Re S03-09 County District Attorney �_._.. Fund a portion of the Tribal Prosecution Unit, to investigate and prosecute crimes related to Tribal gaming. y ,, Law Enforcement quested $1,661,616 Nvj,AVlGU $289,892 Recommended $289,298.36 , waraea 8289,298.36 Total Soboba 20% Non -Nexus, SDF Paying Tribe Grants $289,892.00 $289,298.36 $289,298.36 Rebuttal to Mayor Stubblefield Mayor Stubblefield, our council member on the Tribal Committee, appears to have misinterpreted my remarks in the Press Enterprise. If he had read it carefully, he would have noted that my vote was the result of lack of information furnished by his Committee to the Council at large. At the special meeting on August 5, 2009, just prior to the presentation to the BIA, Mayor Stubblefield offered a prepared presentation that was to be voted on by the Council. It seems that the Tribal Subcommittee of two members had made a unilateral decision to respond to the BIA, based on a review of the information obtained from the City Staff review on July 22, 2009. That review was not forwarded to the other Council Members prior to the request for a vote. At that meeting, a councilman requested a 5-0 vote without any input or questioning of the information contained in the presentation. To be told that I must vote a certain way based on the desires of two Council members is a "capricious" whim, and has no place in a representative forma of city government. I was seated in December, 2008, and was briefed on the plans of the Soboba Tribe by the City Attorney. His briefing was mainly a review of the proposal for the use of the land that the Tribe had purchased. As I noted in my remarks to the newspaper, no other information, recordings, or reports, were submitted to the Council by the Tribal Subcommittee regarding their fact finding, even though they have enumerated a number of meetings on their Agenda item tonight. They have taken the attitude that they, and not the Council as a body, should prepare a course of action, without direction from the Council. I am very mindful of the concerns of the residents located in and adjacent to the proposed addition to the "Trust" land. I have reviewed the BIA DEIS report and have a number of questions and lingering concerns regarding that report, but I also know how the BIA works, and we must consider the obligations to the whole community to support legal action through an injunction or law suit, if the decision is not in the best interest of the community. ve Di Mem FACT SHEET Since my city council colleague has chosen to attack my opinion as an agenda item on September, 3, 2009, regarding the "Fee to Trust" project of the Soboba Tribe. I am compelled to respond. First I would like to be sure all, including my colleague, understand the definition of "capricious," which is to act impulsively. I believe, after a presentation of the FACTS, it will be clear that my colleagues have acted capriciously, by requesting a rubber stamp vote of a Sub Committee's unilateral decision. The opposition opinion piece would have you to believe there has been a 300% increase in calls for public safety services on the reservation. Supposedly this is infoiination presented to the city by law enforcement personnel for 2004 through 2008. I have been on the council since 12/2008 and have never received this infoiination. I have been told in response to my request for such infoiination, "it is being gathered." So where did the Mayor obtain the infoiination on which he bases his comments? PUBLIC SAFETY The city's annual reports and budget narrative have indicated its expectation of increased criminal activity based on its own city approved growth. It indicated in the annual report 2005/2006 a 2.8% increase, and as recently as the 2008/2009 Budget, stated the crime rate is down 16%. A review of the DEIS for the Soboba Tribe expansion had a number of important references (see DEIS excerpts): Section 5 — Page 28 — No mitigation measures required for law enforcement. Section 3 — Pages 134 through 138 — Reflected an analysis of the crime rates for 2005, including surrounding cities (Banning, Beaumont, Hemet and San Jacinto), surprisingly seemed to exceed those of the county overall, the state, and almost higher overall nationally. There was also a chart on the service calls to the reservation and casino, as provided by the Riverside County Sheriff's Depaitiuent. Those stats for 2006, 2007, and through May, 2008 showed that priority calls (life -threatening and crimes in progress), totaled 13 for the reservation and 18 for the casino. In other categories, as well as priority calls, there was actually a decline. The May 2008 incidents (occurring on a REMOTE location on the reservation), according to the Press Enterprise, caused the Fire Department to request police escorts to the reservation. Let us not forget that in the city the Fire Department stages down the street, on such calls, until the police make the area safe for them. This is a standard procedure for safety, no matter where the response is needed. CITIZEN REPRESENTATION "Improving quality and quantity of jobs in the community" was listed as the top citizen concern, and was the number one pick for the city to improve in the city's own survey conducted in April, 2009. If we as a council are not going to use the survey as a tool for direction, then why was $ 17,000 wasted to conduct it? I noticed that my colleague included a copy of one letter to the city from a citizen in opposition, and conveniently ignored the one who wrote a letter to the editor in support of jobs for the community. (Copy attached) LEGAL COSTS Thus far the taxpayers have paid legal costs that have exceeded $ 80,000.00 in less than two years dealing with this issue. How much more do the residents of the city have to pay if the city enters into litigation? The matter never came before the full city council in an open session until 8/5/09, when my colleagues were pressing me to vote in opposition without the benefit of any factual information to support their position. The only open public session that the Tribal Subcommittee sought public inclusion was in May, 2009 with the retirement community of Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park by conducting their meeting in the park. What other town hall meetings were held seeking input from the total community? STAFF REPORT BY CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY It would be too time consuming to begin to address all the well -worded statements in the report to create the illusion they desire. The BIA has acknowledged the comments and filed them with their records. I will simply take one item to demonstrate. The seven page comment letter of 1/17/08. What I learned from that letter regarding their alleged issue on public safety lacked any statistics and merely referenced an article by the Press Enterprise. The city manager has informed me that the issue of concern is that of "community isolation." The point is, public safety service calls are a fact of life that we all accept. If we had the numbers on the casino attendance versus the calls for service the rate per 100,000 would actually be minimal, and most likely be far less than the city statistics shown on page 3-135 of the DEIS, but you don't see the tribe asking to keep the San Jacinto citizens out of their area. Using that same chart, Hemet has an excessive arson rate, but no one is clamoring for a ban on the sale of matches. Frankly, the stats show that cities far exceed the county rural rates, it is just a part of urban living. Seems the stats indicate it is more dangerous to live in San Jacinto than on the reservation. Therefore, my concern has been, and will continue to be, the overall aspects of the proposal related to public safety, traffic impact, and jobs creation for the benefit of the entire community, and the Soboba Tribe expansion should not be dismissed without a full, honest, and accurate review of the issues by the entire community and the city council. It is the responsibility of the City Council, as a body, to review all available factual data regarding any project or matter that comes before it, and direct the Staff to carry out its informed directions. Don't block casino, jobs, prosperity I Local Views I PE.com I Southern California News I ... Page 1 of 1 Search PE.com ! search. I NEE. SEARCH by Don't block casino, jobs, prosperity III ►■ FFI To LIS1EN to sTOR .�iillll — — Download story podcast 10:00 PM PDT on Sunday, August 23, 2009 By DAN VIESCAS SS I recently read an article in The Press -Enterprise ("Residents at odds over casino issues," Aug. 6) about the proposed building of a new casino and hotel in San Jacinto. The story related how a handful of seniors in a senior community near the proposed casino and hotel site complained that the project would inconvenience them by adding more traffic and noise to their area. I see that the phrase "not in my backyard" is still alive and well. I'm astonished at the selfishness of some people in a community where unemployment is so high and no real industry exists to support the number of people needing jobs. I often think of people who move into small towns like San Jacinto and oppose growth and progress. This is an area where affordable housing attracts young families and, yes, older folks as well. To simply turn one's head from that is wrong. Look around and you'll see all the new housing developments that have sprouted in just the past two years. Although the housing industry is going through a tough time right now, it will come back and this town will continue to grow -- like it or not. I can't remember or even think of a time when anyone opposed building a senior/55-plus community. A great number of these are here in San Jacinto, aren't they? But, some of these seniors feel they have a right to stop anything that might change the status quo. When I heard of the possibility of a new casino and hotel being built here in San Jacinto, I thought of all the jobs that would be created by the construction phase and how, when the project is completed, money would flow into the town, not to mention the jobs that would be created. An economic boost would come not just from the casino and hotel, but from the fact that with a bigger and better facility comes bigger and better events, which spur more revenue and draw interest from outside developers. I remember growing up in and around Santa Ana, how people bucked at the thought of becoming a real town. Yet you can't stop progress. Those who think they can are fooling themselves. As for those in the not -in -my -backyard group, I would wager that on any given day, you could find many of them in the Soboba Casino seated at the slots. These are just my thoughts. And guess what? I am a senior citizen and I live in San Jacinto. Dan Viescas is a resident of San Jacinto. httr,•//txnanzr r,Pr`nm/lnralnewc/nnininn/lnealviews/stnries/PF OnPd (minion S on 24 vies... 08/29/09 Section 3.0 Description Of Affected Environment The Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) provides natural gas services, and serves 19.8 million customers through 5.6 million gas meters covering 23,000 square -miles of service area (SCGC 2006). Out-of-state natural gas basins supply most of the natural gas used in California. In 2003, 42 percent of the natural gas supply originated in basins located in the southwestern United States, 26 percent was from Canada, 14 percent was from the Rocky Mountain region, and 18 percent was from basins located within California (City of Santa Clarita 2008). SCGC receives natural gas from the El Paso Pipeline and the Transwestern Pipeline. The El Paso Pipeline delivers natural gas from the Cities of Topock and Ehrenberg, Arizona to SCGC receiving pipelines with respective intrastate receipt capacities of 540 and 1,210 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d). The Transwestern Pipeline delivers natural gas from Topock, Arizona and Needles, California to SCGC receiving pipelines with respective intrastate receipt capacities of 50 and 750 MMcf/d (U.S. Department of Energy 2001). The natural gas is then delivered to local transmission and distribution pipeline systems or to natural gas storage fields. TELEPHONE SERVICES Verizon provides all basic telecommunications services, including cellular communications, to the Project Site. Verizon currently has above ground phone lines, which provide service to the Project Site. Verizon provides service for local toll calls and long distance service. Area residents also have the option of long-distance service from a wide variety of companies that include MCI, Sprint, and AT&T. LAW ENFORCEMENT This section describes the law enforcement situation and measures on the Project Site and the Reservation. First, an overview of crime in the Project Site and surrounding area, as well as on the Reservation is presented. Then, a discussion of crime associated with casinos is provided based on review of available literature. Finally, the current law enforcement arrangements between the Tribe and relevant agencies are discussed. Incidence of Crime Based on data provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Tables 3-30 and 3-31 show the crime rates in 2005 per 100,000 people in the major cities in the vicinity of the Project Site, Riverside County, the State of California, and the nation. It appears that the incidence of most of the crime in the four cities is higher than that of the county. Hemet and San Jacinto lead the other areas in larceny/theft, while Banning and Hemet have the highest rates of burglary. May 2009 3-134 Soboba Band OfLuiseno Indians Draft EIS Section 3.0 Description Of Affected Environment TABLE 3-30 CRIME RATES PER 100,000 PEOPLE (2005) Area Murder/ Rape Robbery Larceny/ Vehicle Arson Aggravated Burglary Theft Theft Manslaughter Assault San Jacinto Hemet Banning Beaumont Riverside County California U.S. 14.2 4.5 0.0 5.5 2.0 6.9 5.6 28.3 28.4 38.1 21.9 6.0 26.0 31.7 141.7 210.4 138.5 93.2 21.8 176.1 140.7 283.4 325.3 488.3 170.0 82.5 317.3 291.1 1,165.5 1,358.1 1,766.2 674.5 200.3 693.3 726.7 2,316.8 2,899.8 1,800.8 2,221.0 429.8 1,916.5 2,286.3 846.6 0.0 844.7 20.9 481.4 0.0 597.8 5.5 204.6 3.6 712.8 0.0 416.7 0.0 Source: Extrapolated from data by U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reporting Program, "Crime in the United States 2005 - Tables 4, 8, and 10," http://www.fbi.ciov/ucr/05cius/about/index.html, accessed August 1, 2007. 3,000.0 2,500.0 d 0 a 2,000.0 0 0 0 0 1,500.0 d d Q 1,000.0 a> E v 500.0 0.0 TABLE 3-31 CRIME RATES PER 100,000 PEOPLE (2005) \m� reS" •ire c. P-q �o�o Category of Crime o' PcS0 San Jacinto Hemet o Banning o Beaumont ® Riverside County ❑ California Source: Developed from data by U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reporting Program, "Crime in the United States 2005 -Tables 4, 8, and 10," http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/about/index.html, accessed August 1, 2007. Information compiled by the Riverside County Sheriffs Department (RCSD) is used to assess the incidence of crime on the Reservation. According to these data, the rate of reported crime on the May 2009 3-135 Soboba Band Of Luiseho Indians Draft EIS Section 3.0 Description Of Affected Environment Reservation has generally decreased over the past two years. A review of reported crime shows that the number of calls requesting service by law enforcement agencies dropped from 633 to 521 overall between 2006 and 2007. Table 3-32 shows the number of calls requesting law enforcement service to the Reservation and the existing casino in 2006, 2007, and for the first 5 months of 2008. Calls are categorized according to priority. Priority lA and Priority 1 calls involve life -threatening or potentially life -threatening situations, or are for crimes in progress. TABLE 3-32 CALLS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE TO THE RESERVATION AND EXISTING CASINO, 2006 THROUGH MAY 2008 Priority lls Number of Calls Number of Number of (2006) Calls (2007) CaMay J2008)ry Reservation lA 0 2 2 1 1 2 6 2 83 51 81 3 108 65 49 4 32 31 26 5 Subtotal Reservation 0 0 0 224 152 164 Existing Casino lA 1 2 3 4 5 Subtotal Existing Casino 4 5 2 1 6 0 126 117 55 173 148 40 105 89 25 0 4 0 409 369 122 Total 633 521 286 Sources: Riverside County Sheriffs Department, Information Services Bureau, June 27, 2008, "Calls for Service to the Soboba Indian Reservation (Not including the Soboba Casino) Calendar Years 2006, 2007, and 2008 (Year to date, January -May)." Riverside County Sheriffs Department, Information Services Bureau, June 27, 2008, "Calls for Service to Soboba Casino, 23333 Soboba Rd., San Jacinto 92883, Calendar Years 2006, 2007, and 2008 (Year to date, January -May)." May 2009 3-136 Soboba Band Of Luiseho Indians Draft EIS Section 3.0 Description Of Affected Environment Law Enforcement on the Project Site and Reservation Under Public Law 83-280 (see Section 2.1.1, Security and Law Enforcement, for a discussion of PL 280), the RCSD and California Highway Patrol (CHP) are responsible for responding to emergencies on the Reservation. Law enforcement services to both the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the Project Site are also provided by RCSD. Since 2004, the City of San Jacinto has contracted with RCSD to provide law enforcement services for San Jacinto, including the incorporated portion of the Project Site. The RCSD station that services San Jacinto is located at 160 West 6th Street in San Jacinto. Riverside County's budget for fiscal year 2007-08 allocates funds for 1,879 sworn and non -sworn patrol personnel. Presently there are 1,879 funded and 2,104 filled deputies. RCSD seeks to maintain a ratio of 1.2 deputies per 1,000 residents. Based on the 2007 Riverside County population of 2,031,625, RCSD is required to have 2,438 deputies, illustrating that RCSD is operating at approximately 14 percent under capacity. RCSD would have to add 334 positions to operate at the recommended service level of 1.2 deputies per 1,000 residents. The Hemet Station, located at 43950 Acacia Avenue, has allotted 50 sworn deputy/corporal positions (Riverside County, 2006), along with one captain, one lieutenant, and eight sergeants. This station services and is the closest station to the Reservation and Project Site, with a response time of three to five minutes to the Project Site for high priority calls (City of San Jacinto Police Department, July 20, 2007). The RCSD does not have a defined response time goal; however, average response times for the Hemet Station in fiscal year 2004-2005 were 10.88 minutes for priority one calls, 15.24 minutes for priority two calls, and 19.70 minutes for priority three calls ?° The CHP also responds to calls on the Reservation, with the nearest CHP station being the San Gorgonio Pass (Station 655) in Beaumont, California, located approximately 12 miles north of the Project Site. Soboba Casino security and Tribal security staff members also provide surveillance on the Reservation as needed. The Tribe and RCSD have recently finalized an agreement to improve the law enforcement conditions on the Reservation and develop a better working relationship between the two entities following the tensions raised between them due to recent law enforcement deployments on the Reservation.51 The agreement is the result of three meetings between the Tribe and RCSD held 50 Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission, September 2006, "Draft Municipal Service Review for the Central Valleys, the Pass Area, and Southwestern Riverside County Areas," prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., Irvine, California. 51 While crime rates are generally falling on the Reservation, two isolated incidents recently occurred within its boundaries: On May 8, 2008, Riverside County Sheriffs Department deputies shot and killed Eli Morillo, a 26-year-old Soboba Tribal member, after the officers reportedly had gone to investigate gunfire on a remote part of the Reservation and were fired upon. According to authorities, five deputies fired in the shooting. Four days later, deputies shot and killed Joseph Arres, 36, and May 2009 3-137 Soboba Band OfLuiseno Indians Draft EIS Section 3.0 Description Of Affected Environment in May and June of 2008. The Community Relations Service of the United States Department of Justice facilitated the meetings, which also included representatives of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and the Office of Congressman Jerry Lewis. The following list summarizes the objectives of the agreement: • The agreement is to enhance the provision of public safety services to the Reservation through improving communication, coordination, and collaboration between the two parties. • The two entities agree to establish permanent points of contact, local Departmental and Countywide Tribal liaisons, and coordinated command posts for critical incident response. • The two parties agree to develop cultural training for Departmental personnel, as well as training in law enforcement procedures, crime prevention, and other areas for Tribal personnel. In addition, the two parties agree to develop contingency plans for managing extended displacement of Reservation residents because of closures required in situations of disasters and critical incidents, and to coordinate with other public safety agencies that serve the Reservation to examine ways for improving delivery of other public safety services, such as fire, medical emergencies, and disaster response. FIRE PROTECTION The Riverside County Fire Department and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) provide fire protection and emergency response to the Project Site and surrounding area.52 Fire stations in California can have a mix of State, County, contract City, or volunteer -staffed equipment. All stations in the area of the Project Site are dispatched by the CDF/Riverside County Fire Department Perris Emergency Command Center (ECC) and are part of the "Integrated Fire Protection System," under contract with California.53 Therefore, fire Tamara Angela Hurtado, 29, again in an isolated section of the Reservation in the foothills of the San Jacinto Mountains. According to authorities, the deputies were responding to 911 callers who reported that the Tribe's security booth, which controls access to the Reservation, had been hit by gunfire. The two Tribal members were shot multiple times by SWAT officers, who said they had been fired upon by one of the two. Authorities said that nine deputies fired their weapons in that incident. Source: The Press -Enterprise (Riverside, California), May 30, 2008. 52 In response to a series of violent incidents in December 2007, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) required its rescue crews to wait for an escort from the Riverside County Sheriff's Department before responding to emergency calls on the Reservation. The policy was lifted within a few weeks. Two isolated incidents on the Reservation in May 2008 caused CDF to temporarily reinstate the policy; however, the policy was reversed on June 13, 2008. Currently, CDF rescue crews do not require an escort to respond to emergency calls to the Reservation. Source: The Press -Enterprise (Riverside, California), June 13, 2008. 53 Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission, September 2006, "Draft Municipal Service Review for the Central Valleys, the Pass Area, and Southwestern Riverside County Areas," prepared May 2009 3-138 Soboba Band Of Luiseno Indians Draft EIS personnel. The Tribe did in fact receive a letter from the City of San Jacinto seeking a temporary withdrawal of the project application due to recent events that occurred in May 2008. Last month I attended a City Council meeting; plans for a Hotel by a Developer friend of the City at the Gateway Project were approved by the City Council; perhaps I should have requested that those plans be suspended because there were 3 gang related murders in the City of San Jacinto. In good faith, I cannot say we do not have our problems as a community. We do. Unfortunately there is crime and violence in all communities. In Mayor Stubblefield's letter, he states that crime has risen 300% on the Reservation related to the Casino. I don't know where these facts came from; I don't even know if they are true and I don't know what they are compared to. Statistics from RSO have indicated that calf for service for the Casino and Reservation have declined in recent years. With the 250,000 plus people that frequent the Casino in a month; approximately 3 million people in one year...we are doing an excellent job in reducing calls for service. I can tell you that some of the calls for service are drug related because the Casino has initiated a "zero tolerance" and RSO is called for arrest and prosecution. We are being exceptionally pro -active with the support of the Riverside County Sheriff's department and do not hesitate to make those calls. Other calls are minor in nature. I can also tell you that the Casino and RSO do track the calls for service and only 5 calls were made in the month of August. Mayor Stubblefield mentions his concern for public safety throughout his letter; which I support as well. There is a serious gang activity problem in the Valley including the City of San Jacinto. I have witnessed 2 shootings; one in Hemet and 1 in San Jacinto due to gang violence. But yet the City Council refuses to admit there is a problem... The first step for recovery is first to admit there is a problem! We, as Community Leaders need to work together for the betterment of this Valley. In dosing, I am publically requesting the City Council sub- committee to meet with the Tribal Council sub -committee to discuss various issues and concerns relating to the City of San Jacinto and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians. I will follow-up with this request in a formal letter to the City of San Jacinto. Rose Salgado AGENDA JOINT REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO September 3, 2009, 7:00 p.m. 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room, San Jacinto, CA 92583 ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Certificate of Appreciation to Steve Hewitt 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the City Council. 3. JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS (SECTIONS 3A AND 3B) The matters listed under Consent Calendars are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. If an item is pulled, it will be heard at the end of number '5. Staff Reports.' 3A CONSENT CALENDAR — CITY COUNCIL 3A.1 Waive Reading of all Ordinance Introductions and Read by Title Only / Approve / City Clerk 3A.2 August 5, 2009 Minutes — Special Meeting / Approve / City Clerk 3A.3 August 6, 2009 Minutes — Regular Meeting / Approve / City Clerk City Council Agenda September 3, 2009 Page 2 of 4 3A.4 Continuation of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency due to The Severe High and Damaging winds / Approve the continuation of the proclamation of the Local State of Emergency / City Attorney 3A.5 Warrants and Disbursements for July 2009 / Receive and File / Interim Finance Director 3A.6 Treasurers Report for June 30, 2009 / Receive and File / City Treasurer 3A.7 Request to appropriate Government Facilities DIF monies in the amount of $30,000 / Approve / Assistant City Manager 3A.8 2009 Downtown Pavement Rehabilitation Project (CIP 09-012), authorization to advertise for bids / Approve / City Engineer 3A.9 Speed Hump Installations along Beringer Drive / Approve / City Engineer 3A.10 Business License Applicable to Rental Properties / Receive and File / Interim Finance Director 3A.11 Temporary Conditional Use Permit 1-09 for a golf driving range / Set Public Hearing / Planning Director Applicant: Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians 23906 Soboba Road San Jacinto, CA 92581 3B CONSENT CALENDAR — REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 4. PUBLIC HEARING 5. STAFF REPORTS At the end of the scheduled City Department items, anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor; state their name, address, and the consent calendar item number pulled. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 Credit Card, Debit Card and Electronic Check Payment Acceptance / Approve / Interim Finance Director 5.2 Additional Funding For Police Station Expansion Project / Approve / Chief of Police City Council Agenda September 3, 2009 Page 3 of 4 5.3 Resolution No / Resolution Opposing Closure of Gilman Hot Springs Road / Adopt / City Manager and City Engineer A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE CLOSURE OF GILMAN HOT SPRINGS ROAD 5.4 Comments Made to and From the Public regarding Soboba Fee to Trust Application / Discuss / City Manager and City Attorney 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Sub -Committee and/or Agency Agendas / Receive and File / City Clerk 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9: One (1) case 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) Section 54956.9) Name of Case: City of San Jacinto v. Acting Pacific Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs (Docket No. IBIA 08-122-A) 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representative: Barry McClellan, City Manager Employee organization: SEIU and Management/Confidential 7.4 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR 1155 South State Street, San Jacinto Negotiation Parties: Tim Hults, Assistant City Manager and/or Barry McClellan, RDA Executive Director (for the RDA), and James Antoyan (for property owner(s)) Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 7.5 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: one (1) or more potential cases 8. ADJOURNMENT City Council Agenda September 3, 2009 Page 4 of 4 If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing. CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (951) 537-6358, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS (SB 343) -- Any public record, relating to an open session agenda item, that is distributed within 72 hours prior to the meeting is available for public inspection at the public counter located in the Administration Building of City Hall, 595 S San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California, 92583. I, R,ichardfMiffer, Deputy, City Cferk,of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certin, that I caused to &e posted the foregoing agenda this 28th day ofAugust, 2009, as required by Caw. ard94iffer, Deputy City Cferk AGENDA ITEM _3A.1_ September 3, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Attorney and City Clerkl SUBJECT: Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading by Title Only RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, waive the full reading of any and all ordinances on this meeting's agenda, and authorize their reading by title only. BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 36934 requires that all ordinances shall be read in full either at the time of their introduction or their passage. However, Government Code Section 36934 allows the waiver of this requirement by regular motion adopted by majority vote if the title of the ordinance is read. This waiver can be accomplished at the time of each ordinance action, or as a standing waiver, accomplished as a consent calendar motion. In order to stream -line the process for the passage of ordinances, the City Attorney and staff propose the second option, which is the waiver of any and all ordinances on this agenda. ALTERNATIVES: Approval: Approve the addition of the attached language to all future agendas of the City Council, thus waiving the full reading of all future ordinances. Denial: Do not approve the agenda language and, instead, before the passage of any ordinance and after the reading of its title, make a motion that must be adopted by majority vote that allows a waiver of the full reading. FISCAL IMPACT: None Approvals City Manager: Finance Directors Page 1 of 1 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 5, 2009, 3:30 p.m. City of San Jacinto City Hall Conference Room 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Mayor Dale Stubblefield called the special meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 3:36 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Jim Ayres, Steve Di Memmo, John Mansperger, Jim Potts, Dale Stubblefield Absent: None 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 2.0 Public Comments None 3. OLD BUSINESS None 4. NEW BUSINESS 4.1 Soboba Fee to Trust Application (to be discussed with possible action of direction, at either City Hall or Hemet Public Library or both) Mayor Dale Stubblefield presented the presentation; the full presentation is on file with the city clerk. Council Member Jim Ayres said that there was nothing mentioned in the mayor's speech about the loss of sales tax or hotel (TOT) tax; that has to be in there. There is a misconception that the City is going to collect sales tax and hotel (TOT) tax. The environmental document states that the city is going to gain nine -hundred thousand dollars ($900,000) a year in sales tax. That is a myth and it needs to be stated in the speech. The City also needs to be accurate on the contract with the Sheriff Department. There is also the issue of the loss of property taxes that will be gone if this goes through. Five Hundred and thirty-five acres that will be gone forever. City Council Minutes August 5, 2009 Page 2 of 11 Especially now when we are talking about loss of revenue in government. This has a permanent impact if this goes through. Currently the tribe owns the property that they are paying taxes on. Council Member Jim Potts commented especially after putting in the new clubhouse. Council Member Ayres also stated that when the clubhouse was built the tribe went through the proper planning process, it was approved and all the standards were followed. If this annexation is approved the tribe will not have to abide by those standards and can build anything they want. The residents in the area will have to endure it and that is wrong. Vice Mayor John Mansperger said that what the residents in the area will have to go through, if this is approved, is the most important issue. Council Member Ayres said that with no contract with the Fire or Sheriff Department the burden will fall on the tax payers of the City of San Jacinto. Vice Mayor Mansperger said that one of his concerns is the weapons that are floating around on the reservation, of which many are illegal. Council Member Ayres commented that if seventy (70) weapons were confiscated from the reservation, it stands to reason there would be more. Vice Mayor Mansperger asked if Police Chief Bill Tyler had a number of how many weapons had been confiscated in the last year. Chief Tyler responded that he had a number of how many weapons has been confiscated for the last seven to eight years. Council Member Ayres said at one of the Public Safety Sub -committee meetings, Chief Tyler estimated the number of weapons confiscated to be in the hundreds. The issue of guns on the reservation is not new, residents hear them, and stray bullets are dangerous. Whenever there is a gun battle with the Sheriffs Department it is a serious issue. Council Member Steve Di Memmo commented that the public safety issue is a big issue. He said that the tax issue could be mitigated, the City does not want to lose money. He said he had not received much feedback from the residents of the mobile home park but there are approximately twenty- eight (28) people against the Soboba Fee to Trust application. The public opinion seems unbalanced with four to five hundred people not responding and only twenty-eight against. Council Member Di Memmo said he supports the public safety issue, the weapons issue, and the tax issue but feels they can be resolved. He said as far as the constituency issue, for or against the Fee to Trust application, he will remain neutral. Council Member Di Memmo said he sees nothing in the Environmental Impact Statement (E.I.S.) that is not resolvable, except for the patching of the reservation. City Council Minutes August 5, 2009 Page 3 of 11 Mayor Stubblefield asked for clarification on Council Member Di Memmo's stand on the issue of the casino being at the proposed location. Council Member Di Memmo responded that he was supportive of public safety, on the City's Police Department and all that. He said that he was going to remain neutral on the casino going in because he does not have all the facts. Mayor Stubblefield stated this is the one and only time for the City to comment on this issue to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). City Attorney Ballinger added that this is the time for the City to comment on the process. Council Member Di Memmo said this is his time to comment. Mayor Stubblefield said that this is the time for the City to comment. Council Member Di Memmo said he was commenting here and at this time he is going to remain neutral. Council Member Potts clarified that Council Member Di Memmo was remaining neutral because he did not have all the facts yet. Council Member Di Memmo said he was remaining neutral because he did not have the numbers from the people that live in the three communities. They are not more than fifty percent. Council Member Ayres stated he strongly disagreed with Council Member Di Memmo based on experience and tenure on the council. (At this time Council Member Di Memmo started to talk and Council Member Ayres asked him not to interrupt and let him finish what he was saying). He said in the past, before Council Member Di Memmo was seated on the council, they met with the residents. Rooms of several hundred people where they all stood up and said they were against it, not only was the Mayor there, Sheriff Stan Sniff was there, and County Supervisor Jeff Stone was there. He said based on the council's efforts in the community over a longer period of time, not just the last couple of months, the general consensus is that the residents are against this. They don't want to be surrounded by a casino gaming operation. They support the gaming operation on the existing six thousand acre reservation, but not in their back yards. Council Member Ayres suggested to Council Member Di Memmo, if he believes all of the other issues of guns, drugs, and the impacts can be mitigated, he recommend to the tribe that they withdraw their application for five years and clean up their act and resubmit it. Council Member Di Memmo responded by saying he had no problem with Council Member Ayres suggestion. City Council Minutes August 5, 2009 Page 4 of 11 Council Member Ayres said long before Council Member Di Memmo was seated, the City Council took them on regarding the Horseshoe property, which is around the Soboba Mobile Home Park, and the council got the Soboba Tribe to withdraw their plans. He asked for confirmation from City Attorney Ballinger. City Attorney Ballinger confirmed Council Member Ayres statement. Council Member Ayres said this is the same process. Council Member Di Memmo asked what the reason to withdraw the application was. City Attorney Ballinger responded that the project had an inadequate Environmental Review. Council Member Ayres commented that is exactly what this is. They have supplied a document that has not answered a single question that this council put forward. The Tribe has basically ignored the council and the existence of the residents that live in that area. Council Member Ayres asked Council Member Di Memmo if he read the document. Council Member Di Memmo responded yes he had read the document. Council Member Ayres said that Council Member Di Memmo should have seen that in there. He asked if he was right or wrong. City Attorney Ballinger responded that Council Member Ayres was right. Council Member Ayres said after all that is factored in to it, and the Tribe never telling the council about the land and trust fee. The council heard about it from the consultant in Washington. The way the Soboba Tribe has this laid out from the land use aspect, the public safety aspect; the lack of respect of the rule of law, and the total disrespect. The public embarrassment in regards to comments that have been made by senior officials from the reservation about this government and governments around this government. Council Member Ayres said how anyone can support this is beyond his comprehension. Council Member Potts said if there was a group that totally supported this and were organized and came to the council as their elected officials with a list of people endorsing it and said they were for this; he would say that yes, this is the way the democratic system works. But the council has not heard from anyone from the mobile home park or the tract of homes that will come forward and say they are for the project, not one. Council Member Di Memmo said that when it was brought up early on after he was seated he said he would not make a decision until he had all the City Council Minutes August 5, 2009 Page 5 of 11 facts. He said that he made a flyer and walked the neighborhood leaving them on the doors of the homes in the area. He received twenty-eight (28) responses from people out of the mobile home park that said they absolutely do not want it. Council Member Potts said they should have petitioned the council, instead of going through one councilman. He said they don't know that that's true; he could come in here and say there are 200 people that told me they like this project. How do we as the rest of the elected officials know that's true, these are innuendos. Council Member Di Memmo responded no they are not; he said he had emails from many people. Council Member Potts interjected that Council Member Di Memmo should bring the e-mails in and share them with the Tribal Sub Committee and not keep them to himself. Council Member Di Memmo responded no, he is gathering facts as he was advised to do. Mayor Stubblefield said there needs to be an understanding that this is an Environmental Impact Statement (E.I.S.) that they have brought out that needs to incorporate mitigation measures. The Tribe is saying they are making a positive public safety impact and we all know that is wrong. From a land use aspect, looking at the City's zoning code, it is primarily residential and was going to be developed with residential and now we are looking at putting a commercial complex there. This is not consistent with the city ordinance. The issue of who wants it and who does not want it is not the issue. The fact that the Horseshoe project (the annexation) is making islands of the homes in the area is unprecedented in the State of California. How is this to be served with public safety, they are islands? You can't argue that fact, that issue needs to be addressed. When you start looking at those issues and its not that I don't like Soboba, or I don't think they should have a casino, it's a good thing, or I think they should have the casino, it comes down to what are the impacts and how the city is going to be mitigated for them, not only today but fifty (50) years from now. How is this going to work out? You are right, maybe the public safety can be mitigated. We are not saying these things can not be mitigated, we are saying they are not addressed in the statement, and the Council is asking the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) to meet with the City to go over these concerns. We are asking because there are so many issues, we are asking them to relocate their casino operation on their existing reservation because that is the ultimate mitigation measure. Right now the BIA is not talking to the City, right now the Tribe is not talking to us. This is a starting point for us, to be able to get a good starting point. It is not intended for us to put up a big wall or anything else. I have stayed quiet through this whole process of hearing you guys. This is what I think is best for the City, and City Council Minutes August 5, 2009 Page 6 of 11 we've talked about it at the Tribal Sub Committee. This is what the City Attorney and the City staff has recommended to the Tribal Sub Committee and it is the same position that Riverside County is taking. Council Member Di Memmo said to Mayor Stubblefield, you give the BIA the information that we stand on here, right. Mayor Stubblefield said that this is a portion of it, there is other information that ..Council Member Di Memmo asked if the City Attorney sends them this is information and this is what the City wants handled in the EIR and then it goes back to BIA, is that correct? City Attorney Ballinger said the City Attorney's office will be providing a more comprehensive list of issues. This is thumbnail of the main issues. Those issues are sent to the BIA for their review and they do with it what they are supposed to do and, what we are saying that in the past they have blown us off, they have not incorporated any of the significant mitigation measures that the City has asked for last September. Council Member Di Memmo asked if City Attorney Ballinger was assuming the BIA would do nothing. City Attorney Ballinger said if past practice is any indication then he would have to assume the BIA would do nothing. Council Member Ayres said that for the Oaks Project there was no Environmental Impact Review (EIR) given to the County, no acknowledgment of it whatsoever. That's why we are dealing with them on that issue now. The Tribal Headquarters, there was no environmental mitigation done, it was just done on their own with no questions asked as to how it impacted the City, no regard to the citizens of this city who we are all sworn to represent. That's their "M. O." and that is what is happening here, except we caught them. The EIR protects everybody and if they do not answer our twenty or twenty five questions or what our issues were on other projects how can we believe they are credible at this point? How can the City not take the position that the Mayor has outlined, where all we are saying is go ahead and build this complex, but do it on the existing reservation. Have your hotel, have your gaming, have your arena, but build it on your reservation? It is pretty simple, it's not hard, leave our citizens alone, leave our property tax alone, and then we will talk about mitigation on the impacts as far as transportation goes, which is another topic that we don't need to get into now. How does the Council go out of this room tonight and not be united? How do we go out there, in front of everybody, with the BIA and be divided? I stand behind the Mayor on this. Council Member Di Memmo said on the Oaks Project, the Tribe was wrong; no question they were wrong, the County didn't do anything, County Supervisor Stone didn't do anything. The County didn't go out there and shut them down. The County did not care. So yes, they were wrong on City Council Minutes August 5, 2009 Page 7 of 11 that, on the building on the Tribe, sovereign nation. Now they could have come to the Council and said we want to build a new tribal hall, here's what we want to do but that's sovereign nation. City Attorney Ballinger pointed out that the City did respond on the Oaks project, a letter was sent in terms of mitigation and it was not incorporated in a meaningful way into the ultimate decision. This is why the City must negotiate with the Tribe right now. This is why we want to go through this process and engage the BIA with these comments so that later on we have preserved the rights of the city to take action. Council Member Di Memmo said that the City should be a part of this, no question, but he is just saying in regards to the tribal hall, that was built on sovereign nation. That's their land; they can do what they want on Tribal land. Council Member Ayres said then they can build their casino anywhere they want. Council Member Di Memmo said that's true, the Tribe can. Council Member Ayres asked Council Member Di Memmo if he had met with the tribal council since he had been elected. Council Member Di Memmo said he has not met with them but he knows them all. City Attorney Ballinger said to Council Member Di Memmo that when you talk about part of the issue when you talk about the tribal hall all of this land here (he points to the slide) their proposal for a casino (indicates another area) here, if that goes forward all of this land remains vacant but is tribal land which means they can do whatever they want with that. Council Member Di Memmo said that is correct. Council Member Ayres said it would be sovereign nation and they can do whatever they want, build their casino on sovereign nation, and build it all out there, that's what we're saying. Do you agree with that? City Attorney Ballinger said they could build a seventy story building out there and there is nothing the City can do about it. Council Member Di Memmo said once that becomes sovereign nation that is correct. I am not saying that I support that, what I am saying is, I support the public safety; I support all the other factors that we are looking at, that the City needs to be involved, we need to protect our citizens and our community. I support all that. I haven't seen any set of plans, or anything, just this land here. City Council Minutes August 5, 2009 Page 8 of 11 Council Member Potts asked City Attorney Ballinger once this is brought into the sovereign nation, these pieces that they want, they can basically do about what they want on that land, right? City Attorney Ballinger said, not basically, they can do anything they want. Council Member Potts said so whatever they want to put in there they can, sort of like the Oaks. City Attorney Ballinger said yes, more so than the Oaks because the Oaks was not .... Interrupted by Mayor Stubblefield Mayor Stubblefield interrupted and stated lets talk about the environmental issues. There are two proposals that they are proposing tonight. This is proposal "A", their preferred proposal, where they realign Lake Park, and put the home (he points out the area on the map) you can see the plan actually the way it overlays is going to come up to the back, this is the road, right to the back of the existing mobile homes. This is a four story parking garage. Council Member Potts commented the parking garage would be looking right over into those homes. Mayor Stubblefield said this is a five thousand square foot arena and this is what we are talking about, noise, when they hold their concerts at this arena down here the people in these communities can hear them all night long. Council Member Ayres (pointing to the map) I know the gentleman that lives right here, his name is Dan Thompson, and to place a freeway behind his house is not what he had hoped for to retire. Mayor Stubblefield said that the environmental concerns that the Council were talking about is that there is a fault line that runs through here, (pointing to the map) that's why they configured it the way that it is, you have the blue line streams that comes out of this here that is not even mitigated in The E.I.S. and how are they going to handle the flooding. The money we spend to take care of the Soboba, that two -hundred thousand dollars for the land slides. Council Member Ayres again stated that this project is all fine and dandy but put it on your reservation. Have the impacts born by those who are going to benefit from it the most. Council Member Potts said all these people that live along here will be looking up at a three story parking structure. City Council Minutes August 5, 2009 Page 9 of 11 Mayor Stubblefield said that the difference in proposal "B" is that Lake Park goes straight through and there is another parking garage, the gas station, and then this arena is here in this area right here. Council Member Ayres said so when Def Leppard comes to play those seniors are going to be rocking. I can hear my phone ringing now. Council Member Di Memmo said, you keep it on the reservation and do a new bridge at Esplanade, right? Council Member Ayres said the City would not support a bridge, the City would support a Arizona Crossing (which is a low water road, similar to what used to be out there) it is six million dollars cheaper and gives them access. We went to them after the Esperanza fire and sat down with the Chairman and said, we would support punching Esplanade through to the reservation which will give your folks on the reservation a second ingress and egress off the reservation in case of a catastrophic fire. This was a lesson we learned from the Esperanza fire. We were told flat out, no. Council Member Di Memmo asked if they were given a reason or if they just said no. Council Member Ayres said we have had meetings where we show up and they don't, this has gone on for years and now all of a sudden when we ask to have in the room Congressman Jerry Lewis, Senator John Benoit, Assemblyman Paul Cook, Supervisor Jeff Stone, someone from the Governors' office, they stop wanting to meet with us. We're here in the best interest of the citizens of San Jacinto, we are not saying no, we are saying build it on the reservation, they have six thousand acres out there. Mayor Stubblefield said to further illustrate that issue (he referred to the city map on the wall in the conference room). This is the existing casino operation, the proposal that they are going to do takes it up this spot right here. They still have all this room here, this is Esplanade. This looks so much better; it gives them two points of access. Council Member Ayres said you can't even see the oaks or the tribal headquarters in this photograph, it goes farther back. Mayor Stubblefield said as you start to look at it, this area makes more sense. The thing is we would support some kind of green belt crossing that goes across here to the golf course but they have no proposal for that. We have been trying to get the Tribe to the table. All we have so far is this EIS being shoved down our throat and going to be approved with no mitigation. That's why we bring up these points; if they come to the table and start discussion with us about these things. There are other issues. City Council Minutes August 5, 2009 Page 10 of 11 Council Member Ayres said how do you mitigate noise, how do you mitigate someone looking into your back yard from a three or four story hotel. How do you mitigate 24/7 major gaming operation in a senior laden three neighborhood community; You don't! Mayor Stubblefield said that the only mitigation he sees is if they put it over here (indicating a place on the map). Council Member Ayres said and the Tribe can do whatever they want. That has been our story from the very beginning, it has never changed. Mayor Stubblefield said the Council kept an open mind and tried to communicate with them to see what they are going to do, how it is going to work out and wanted to see all the evidence. Council Member Di Memmo asked how many meetings the Tribal Sub Committee had with the Tribe. That they actually sat down with the tribe. Council Member Ayres said I think we should be accurate about this and have Deputy City Clerk Rick Miller go back a pull those out so that Council Member Di Memmo will have them. We should not give a number because if we are off by two or three that can be misinterpreted. We have had several meetings and we have never got to meet with the Chairman, he would always send Rose Salgado out. We were meeting for a while, City Manager Barry McClellan, myself, Tobin White, and Rosemary Murrillo over at their clubhouse at least four or five times. We were getting nowhere. Council Member Di Memmo said he only knew of one meeting, that was when he was first seated where City Manager McClellan said that the Chairman was not going to be there so it was cancelled. Council Member Ayres said tribal representatives stopped coming to meetings. Assistant City Manager Tim Hults asked Council Member Ayres if those meetings were before this particular application was submitted. Council Member Ayres responded that he did not believe it was. Assistant City Manager Hults said he remembered there were some meetings at the old clubhouse. Council Member Ayres said he could not give an exact number but there were, without the City Manager here, and being accurate, regardless of how many meetings there were we have not gotten anywhere. You can meet with these people until you are blue in the face and you are not going City Council Minutes August 5, 2009 Page 11 of 11 to get anywhere. This document is living proof of that; it's a slug in the face. I don't see how anybody can't see it that way. That's how I see it. Mayor Stubblefield said in the interest of time, it's time to get over to the Public Hearing, it is 4:20 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres/Potts) moved to support the recommendation of the Tribal Sub Committee and the power point presentation and conclude to relocate the project back on the existing reservation and withdraw the Soboba Fee to Trust Application. Motion carried 4/1 Ayes: Ayres, Mansperger, Potts, Stubblefield, Nays: Di Memmo Absent: None Abstain: None 5. MEMBERS REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None 6. RECESS to Public Scoping Meeting, located at Hemet Public Library, 2nd Floor, 300 E. Latham Ave., Hemet, CA 92543 7 ADJOURNMENT Having no further business before the Council, Mayor Stubblefield adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m. ATTEST: Barry McClellan, City Clerk City of San Jacinto Dale Stubblefield, Mayor Approved as read: Approved as amended: MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY August 6, 2009, 7:00 p.m. 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room, San Jacinto, CA 92583 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Mayor Dale Stubblefield called the regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council and Redevelopment Agency to order at 7: 00 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Jim Ayres, Steve Di Memmo, John Mansperger, Jim Potts, Dale Stubblefield Absent: None 1.3 Invocation Due to the absence of Stacy Dickson, San Jacinto United Methodist Church the invocation was not given. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance Council Member Jim Potts led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Due to Robert Michael being on duty at a fire in Winchester this item has been moved to the next regular council meeting of September 3, 2009. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 2.0 Public Comments Paul Angulo, introduced himself to the council as a candidate running for the position of Riverside County Auditor Controller. Mr. Angulo said that his experience includes twenty-five (25) years in the private industry. There have been many problems in this position, but because it is not a high profile position it does not get in the news. He currently works in the department and sees what is going on there and would like to see changes made. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 2 of 18 Kristy Reid, 169 Tiger Lane, San Jacinto informed the council of a robbery that took place at her residence. She told the council that approximately two weeks ago she came home and found that her house had been broken into. She said that she called the Police Department and it took them one (1) hour to respond. Ms Reid said that she felt the responding police officer was insensitive to her requests. She had asked the officer to take fingerprints but the officer refused. Ms Reid stated that she had reason to believe that her neighbor was the person who had broken into her house. Many of the items that were stolen are not replaceable. Ms Reid said she is very unhappy with the actions of the police department. She said other residents in her neighborhood have had their homes broken into. Mayor Stubblefield informed Ms Reid that the council was unable to respond to any comments that were made under public comments; however Assistant City Manager Tim Hults or his representative would look into the issues presented and respond to them. Helen Tanaka, 113 Tiger Lane, San Jacinto passed on her request to speak. Jenice Leslie, 1793 Messina Drive, San Jacinto thanked the council for their united front at the Soboba Fee to Trust Scoping Session held at the Hemet Public Library on August 5, 2009. Ms Leslie said she was encouraged by the comments made by Mayor Stubblefield. Don Leslie, 1793 Messina Drive, San Jacinto spoke on two items. Mr. Leslie said that he is concerned about the conflicting information regarding the hours for the restricted vehicle tonnage on Soboba Road. The sign posted on Soboba Road at Lake Park cites 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. for the 7 ton restriction. The other sign located on Soboba Road near State Street cites 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. He said this could be because one is City and the other is County. Mr. Leslie asked that the matter be looked into for clarification. The other concern that Mr. Leslie had is the issue of the Golf Tournament that is coming up at Soboba Golf Course next month. He said that last year when there was an event at the Golf Course the overflow of parking spilled over into their neighborhood, blocking trash cans which made the trash pick-up an issue. Mr. Leslie asked that someone look at the matter and develop a plan of some sort to alleviate the problem. He requested that someone get back to him on both issues. Russ Utz, 867 Tuberose Drive, San Jacinto thanked the council for attending the Soboba Fee to Trust Scoping Session on August 5, 2009 and providing a united front. He commented that he believed it was an easy choice and not good use of the land. Michael Fred Allen, 565 E. 3rd Street informed the council of the hazards surrounding the construction at Main Street and Jordan. Mr. Allen said due to construction at the corner of Main Street the sidewalk is blocked off and there are signs instructing you to cross the street. He said this is very dangerous at night and very inconvenient for individuals in wheelchairs or those pushing strollers. He City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 3 of 18 asked that someone look into the possibility of installing a wooden tunnel over the sidewalk as not to endanger the public. Mr. Allen commented that this is an accident waiting to happen. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3A.1 Waive Reading of all Ordinance Introductions and Read by Title Only / Approve / City Clerk 3A.2 July 2, 2009 Minutes — Regular Meeting / Approve / City Clerk 3A.3 Continuation of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency due to The Severe High and Damaging winds / Approve the continuation of the proclamation of the Local State of Emergency / City Attorney 3A.4 Resolution No. 3281/ Resolution of Application to LAFCO for City of San Jacinto Reorganization No. 78 / Approve / Assistant City Manager A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REORGANIZATION NO. 78 AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENT FROM THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 3A.5 Fiscal Year 2008-2009 Annual Donations Report / Receive and File / Interim Finance Director 3A.6 Award of Contract for De Anza Drive and Monte Vista Ave Sewer line Project / Approve / City Engineer 3A.7 Warrants and Disbursements for June 2009 / Receive and File / Interim Finance Director 3A.8 Treasurers Report for June 30, 2009 / Receive and File / City Treasurer 3A.9 Resolution No. 3282 / Resolution for approving City Clerk's Bond / Approve / City Attorney A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING BOND FOR CITY CLERK 3A.10 Authorization to distribute a request for proposals to provide design services for a future skate park at Sallee Park / Approve / Assistant City Manager City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 4 of 18 3B CONSENT CALENDAR — REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None M/S/C (Mansperger/Potts) Vice Mayor Mansperger asked for a correction on item 3A.2, July 2, 2009 minutes changing July 7, 2009 to read July 2, 2009 moved to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar. Motion Carried 5-0. Ayes: Ayres, Di Memmo, Mansperger, Potts, Stubblefield Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Resolution No 3283 / Resolution Confirming Additional Project Area Committee ("PAC") Members in Connection with the Proposed Merger of and Amendments to the San Jacinto and Soboba Springs Redevelopment Plans / Approve and Adopt / Assistant City Manager A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING ADDITIONAL PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE MEMBERS FOR THE MERGED SAN JACINTO AND SOBOBA SPRINGS REDEVELOPMENT PLANS (Vice Mayor Mansperger and Council Member Di Memmo abstained from item 4.1 due to possible conflict of interest due to ownership of property.) Assistant City Manager Tim Hults presented the staff report. He said there have been a number of issues related to the formation of the project area committee. There was a resignation from one member who moved out of the project area. There have always been a few openings, one in the residential owner/occupant for which two (2) applications were received, Mr. Ron Simpson and Mr. John Palmer. The applicants were matching in all qualifications therefore Ron Simpson was selected as his was the first application received. The only applicant for Community Organization was Mr. Ken Shaw from United Communities Network. Assistant City Manager Hults recommended approval for the appointment of Mr. Simpson and Mr. Shaw. M/S/C (Potts/Stubblefield)Resolution No 3283 / Resolution Confirming Additional Project Area Committee ("PAC") Members in Connection with the Proposed Merger of and Amendments to the San Jacinto and Soboba Springs Redevelopment Plans. Motion carried 3-0 City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 5 of 18 Ayes: Ayres, Potts, Stubblefield, Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: Di Memmo, Mansperger Vice Mayor Mansperger and Council Member Di Memmo returned to the dais at 7:19 p.m. 5. STAFF REPORTS 5.1 Update on State Budget by League of California Cities Regional Representative David Willmon / Presentation This item was skipped as Mr. Willmon was not present at the time this item was called. 5.2 Speed Hump Installation on Quandt Ranch Road / Approve / City Engineer City Engineer Habib Motlagh presented the staff report. He asked that the Council approve the request for speed hump installation on Quandt Ranch Road as it meets the qualifications and criteria. If approved it would be included in the next CIP project. Council Member Ayres asked if there was a schedule for re -striping the speed humps. He asked if this is a regularly scheduled maintenance or is the correct type of paint being used. City Engineer Motlagh responded that they are checked every six to eight months; however' he will work with the Public Works Department. Council Member Ayres asked how his request for a speed hump will impact the budget for them. City Engineer Motlagh said that there are funds in the budget for at least three or four more. Vice Mayor Mansperger commented that this is one of the worst areas for speed. Council Member Potts said the neighbors signing the petition are possibly the ones speeding. Mayor Stubblefield having no requests to speak asked for a motion. M/S/C (Ayres/Mansperger) moved to approve Speed Hump Installation on Quandt Ranch Road. Motion carried 5-0 City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 6 of 18 Ayes: Ayres, Di Memmo, Mansperger, Potts, Stubblefield, Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.3 Voting Delegate for League of California Cities Conference / Appoint / City Clerk This item was heard out of order, after Item 5.9. Deputy City Clerk Rick Miller presented the staff report. Council Member Ayres said the budget does not allow for this and there is no reason to go. The Council determined no action was needed as they were not attending the League of California Cities Conference. 5.4 Ramona Blvd Streetscape Upgrades and Authorization to Proceed with Design and Advertise for Bids / Approve / City Engineer City Engineer Habib Motlagh presented the staff report. He said there has been a lot of work done on Ramona Blvd. with the landscaping recently being completed. The Transportation Subcommittee had requested the Council approve additional sidewalks on both sides of Ramona Blvd. This will complete the work and fill in the missing gaps as well as put tree wells around existing trees. After looking at the project the costs will be around two -hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) which means it will need to go through the formal bidding process. City Engineer Motlagh asked for authorization to proceed with the design and advertise for bids at the same time in the interest of saving time and to expedite the project. Council Member Ayres said this is an item that he and Council Member Potts recommended to the council. This was done a couple of years ago on Monte Vista Avenue where there was a trench that kids tripped over. He said down by Five Points by the liquor store there is an abandoned driveway where there are steel poles sticking out; the driveway and the poles should be removed. There are also very old triangular shaped planters with bent over palm trees that need to be addressed as well. Just before the church there are some islands that need to be filled in with concrete. This project will make it much safer for the public and be the finishing touch to the Blvd. The street is about eighty-five percent complete and this will finish it off from Five Points to State Street. Council Member Potts said this is a project where as an elected official in the city, you have people come up to you and tell you what a wonderful job staff and city have done and how great the project looks. He thanked the staff for all their hard work. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 7 of 18 Council Member Ayres commented that the Transportation Subcommittee will meet on August 17, 2009 to come back with a recommendation in September for the balance of the $5.2 two million dollars for San Jacinto Avenue to continue that theme down the street. He also said that in front of the Assembly of God Church on Ramona Blvd. there is a speed limit sign that blocks your vision of the speed indicator at night. He asked City Engineer Motlagh to look into relocating the speed limit sign so that the speed indicator was visible. He also commented that the LED lights on Ramona Blvd are excellent. Mayor Stubblefield agreed that Ramona Blvd looks very good. Vice Mayor Mansperger commented that the bollards look great; however the concrete is sloped to drain, and there is a gap at the bottom where the bolts are visible. He asked City Engineer Motlagh to look at them and see if anything could be done. City Engineer Motlagh stated that the bollards were installed the day before and he would look into the issue of gapping tomorrow. M/S/C (Ayres/Potts) moved to approve Ramona Blvd Streetscape Upgrades and Authorization to Proceed with Design and Advertise for Bids. Motion carried 5-0 Ayes: Ayres, Di Memmo, Mansperger Potts, Stubblefield, Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.5 Contract Renewal with Riverside County for Animal Services / Approve / Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Tim Hults presented the staff report. He said the City has been receiving the services for Animal Control from Riverside County since February of 2005. The contract has been on a yearly renewal process. There has been an increase every year, and this year the increase is substantial. There is an increase this year from $172,000 projected budget for this year to a projected $21,096. He said that the bulk of the increase is related to additional shelter costs. There is also an increase of five percent in administration fees. He said that the City has been averaging approximately two hundred intakes per month, which will exceed what has been budgeted for. Twenty one hundred intakes per year have been budgeted for; however, at this time the City is pushing twenty two hundred and could reach twenty four or twenty five hundred after the June numbers have been calculated, which could substantially increase the budget. He said that all the additional costs are being generated from intakes. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 8 of 18 Council Member Potts asked if the City receives any credit for funds that come back to the shelter when an animal is adopted. He asked Interim Finance Director Connie Rogers -Elmore to come to the podium. Interim Finance Director Connie Rogers -Elmore responded saying there is not direct revenue that comes to the City and nothing that appears on invoices received from the County showing a credit for adoptions. Council Member Potts stated that the City is charged when the animals go in but nothing is credited when they come out. Interim Finance Director Rogers -Elmore said when an owner comes back and picks up their animal there is a credit but with adoptions there is not. Council Member Potts asked how many paid employees and volunteers there are at the facility. He said that the City has been given numbers as to the increase but not what costs are for. He asked if the five percent administration fee increase justified. Assistant City Manager Hults said that when his office checked with the County about their surrender rates they were higher than what is being proposed in this contract. Council Member Potts asked if there was anyone in attendance that was representing the County or the Shelter. Mr. Jeff Sheppard, President and CEO of the Ramona Humane Society responded to Council Member Potts concerns. He said that for the adoption of a dog the shelter charges ninety-seven dollars and fifty cents ($97.50) which is for spaying and neutering, flea treatment, leash and collar, micro chip, and any vaccines that are given. Each animal is vaccinated when it comes to the shelter. At the current time there are 637 animals, dogs and cats at the facility. There are 19 paid staff members at the facility at this time to care for the animals seven days a week. This includes the front and back staff. There are seven to eight employees per day to care for the animals. The intake fee of thirty nine dollars and four cents ($39.04) the City is paying is for five days, It is not just for the day the animal comes in. The law requires the animal to be held for five days to give the owner time to find their pet. When the owner comes in within the five day period there is no charge to the city or the county. The owner pays those fees. After the five days are up the animal is put up for adoption. The shelter's audited amount to take care of an animal for one day is fifty dollars and two cents ($50.02). The shelter does not make any money on adoptions. Council Member Potts asked if the numbers that the City was provided were estimates. He asked if the estimates could be higher. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 9 of 18 Mr. Sheppard said that those numbers were very low estimates, and that the estimates could go much higher. This year there have been a record amount of animals being turned in to the shelter. The last four years, the shelter has maintained an approximate amount of fourteen thousand animals per year. From January of this year to July the count had already reached 16,000 animals, which means that the shelter could easily reach over 20,000 animals by the end of the calendar year. Mr. Sheppard said, in his opinion, the five percent increase that the county has given this year for intakes is not realistic. Council Member Potts asked if the number was a county number. Mr. Sheppard said that was a county number; each year their intakes are five percent. Council Member Potts asked about the five percent administration fee. Mr. Sheppard responded that the five percent administration fee came from the shelter. It is the result of the paperwork that must be done each day. It has become so much they will need to hire an additional staff member to lesson the work load. Mr. Sheppard stated that he signed the contract with the county in May; therefore, this issue should have come before the council before today. Council Member Potts asked if the contract is an open ended contract, depending on what type of numbers come in the amount the city will pay could go up considerably. Mr. Sheppard stated that he did not know how the city's contract with the county is written, but the shelter's contract with the county is an estimated amount. You could possibly set an amount and go back and increase it. Council Member Potts said it would be very difficult for the council to accept a contract that was open ended. He asked if language could be included in the contract to alert the city if they were reaching the end of the estimate of funds. Mayor Stubblefield asked Assistant City Manager Hults how the city's contract with the county was written. He asked if there was language stating "not to exceed this amount". Assistant City Manager Hults responded that the contract was open ended, with an amount of thirty nine dollars and four ($39.04) for every dog or cat that is turned in. If a cap is placed on the contract, the contract would need to be amended or the animals would have to be turned away. Mr. Sheppard responded that the shelter had been there for forty years and they would never turn an animal away. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 10 of 18 Mayor Stubblefield said that the shelter does a wonderful job and the issue of service is not in question. The council is only trying to determine the fees. Mayor Stubblefield confirmed that the increase is due mostly to the increase in animals being taken to the shelter. Mr. Sheppard said that recently Riverside County passed an ordinance requiring that owner's put micro chip in every animal. This is a guaranteed way to find the owner, which will reduce the fees. Council Member Potts asked if this happens and the owner picks up their pet is the city charged or issued a credit? Council Member Potts also asked if the shelter checks to make sure that the city is not being double billed. Mr. Sheppard responded about the process: when an animal comes in it is held for five days; however, if the animal comes in with a micro chip or a collar that animal is automatically put on a ten day hold. Within that time period if the owner claims their pet, the owner would pay all of the fees. Therefore, there would be no invoice issued to the city. The shelter does not invoice until after the five day holding period is up. Council Member Di Memmo complimented Mr. Sheppard on what a great job he and the shelter are doing. He said that he had adopted animals from the shelter before. He voiced concerns about the animal control being available from 8 am to 4 pm. He has not seen records of them checking in or out. Council Member Di Memmo asked if there was a way to verify how many animals actually belong to San Jacinto. Mr. Sheppard said that information could be retrieved from their computer system. Council Member Di Memmo said that on the county's website in their 2008- 2009 budget the county collected twenty six thousand seven hundred (26700) animals. This figure is for twelve (12) cities and the unincorporated area which makes two thousand one hundred (2100) animals per city, which is what the city is paying for. He asked if animal control is not in the city every day how would the city know that is an accurate figure. Council Member Di Memmo stated that he believed the City of San Jacinto is paying for other cities' animals. Mayor Stubblefield interjected that the city is not accusing the county of any wrong doing. Mr. Sheppard stated that every animal that comes into the facility has paperwork accounting for the jurisdiction. The shelter sends the billing to the county for each city. That information could easily be supplied to the council. Mr. Sheppard added that the Ramona Animal Humane Society would always be available to the city to service the animal control services. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 11 of 18 Council Member Mansperger asked if the shelter verified residency when turning in animals. He also inquired as to the rates for adoption. Mr. Sheppard responded that the person's residency is verified. He said the rate for a dog is ninety-seven dollars ($97.00) and for a cat it would be sixty dollars ($60.00). If it is a pure bred animal that is highly sought after the adoption fee is increased up to two hundred dollars ($200.00) Council Member Ayres stated that Mr. Sheppard said that this contract should have been before the council back in May, a full month before the budget was adopted. He asked if there was a reason that this contract had not come before the council before now. Assistant City Manager Hults said that the city did not receive the fifth amendment to the agreement until June 20th. That was too late to get on the July 2nd council meeting; this was the next available meeting. Council Member Ayres stated that in the future, the council would need to see this contract before the budget is adopted. He also said that he feels that there should be language in the contract regarding an amount not to exceed. When the amount gets close to that number it would need to come back to the council to amend the contract or find some way to work with the provider. Council Member Ayres commended the shelter on the job they do. Council Member Potts said he would be willing to support the contract if there were a warning that the city is approaching or exceeded some limit. Council Member Ayres said it is the council's responsibility to ask the City Attorney to put language in that would state an amount not to exceed and come back to the council. Mayor Stubblefield said that Ramona Humane Society does a great job and would like to see the contract modification. He also said he would like to see Riverside County Animal Control attend a meeting as well. He would like to see a cap, or control on this contract. Council Member Ayres asked Mr. Sheppard if there was an emergency number that could be called for animals in trouble. Mr. Sheppard stated that there should always be a twenty-four hour number. Council Member Potts asked Sgt. Agnoletto if there was an issue with the County responding to animals issues. Sgt. Dean Agnoletto said that it does happen but it is not a regular issue. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 12 of 18 Council Member Di Memmo said that he would like to have animal control back in the city. He added that he would like to see the Ramona Humane Society pick up the stray animals. Mr. Sheppard said that there is an after hours center at the shelter that is available twenty-four hours a day. It is a small kennel outside the gate that holds ten to fifteen animals, and is air conditioned, and self locking. Every morning it is full. Council Member Ayres asked Interim Finance Director Rogers -Elmore where the revenue for this contract would be coming from. Interim Finance Director Rogers -Elmore said the only option was from the General Fund Reserve. Council Member Ayres stated that he did not like going into the General Fund but sees no way around this. Mayor Stubblefield asked if anyone present wished to speak on this matter. Michael Fred Allen, 565 E. 3rd Street commented that he has the numbers for animal control but you have to work to get them. He said if you look in the phone book under government you will not find a listing. Most people will not be able to find this listing. M/S/C (Ayres/Mansperger) moved to approve the contract with Riverside County for Animal Services in the amount of two hundred and thirteen thousand ninety six dollars ($213,096) with the language built into the contract in amount not to exceed with a caveat that as the city gets within ten to fifteen percent of the twenty-five per -cent amount that the County comes back to the city for any necessary amendments. Motion carried 5-0 Ayes: Ayres, Di Memmo, Mansperger, Potts, Stubblefield, Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.6 Installation of All -way Stop at Palm and Cottonwood Intersection / Approve / City Engineer City Engineer Habib Motlagh presented the staff report. This item was requested by Council Member Potts to see if it was possible to install a signal or stop signs. RK Engineering was engaged to do the review and it was determined that a signal was not warranted at this time, however a all - way stop was recommended. City Engineer Motlagh thanked Council Member Potts for bringing this to the Engineering Department's attention. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 13 of 18 City Engineer Motlagh requested that the Council approve the installation of the all -way stop at the intersection of Palm and Cottonwood. Mayor Stubblefield commented that the all -way stop will be very beneficial as it is very difficult to see children in that area. Council Member Potts stated there are many vehicles at this intersection; it is a good safety issue. M/S/C (Potts/Mansperger) moved to approve installation of All -way Stop at Palm and Cottonwood Intersection. Motion carried 5-0 Ayes: Ayres, Di Memmo, Mansperger, Potts, Stubblefield, Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.7 Authorization to Advertise for Bids for the Sanderson Avenue Widening Project (CIP 06-146) / Approve / City Engineer City Engineer Motlagh presented the staff report saying that this is the second phase of the Sanderson Avenue widening project. The first phase, which included the construction of Sanderson and Ramona Expressway intersection was recently approved by the council and should be completed by the end of September or mid -October 2009, at the latest. This phase of the project is from Esplanade to Ramona Blvd. He asked the council to authorize staff to proceed with advertisement because to obligate the balance of the TUMF funds from WRCOG the bid must be awarded. Mayor Stubblefield asked about the relocation of the poles by SCE. City Engineer Motlagh said for this phase the relocation should be fine if SCE follows through on what they have said. He said in regards to the Ramona and Sanderson section the earliest they can relocate the five or six poles or install the guy wires will be early October. Mayor Stubblefield asked if SCE was on schedule to move the poles at the intersection. City Engineer Motlagh responded that SCE is behind schedule because they had to advertise in the paper for two (2) weeks, after that they are required to wait sixty (60) days. It should be some time in October. He advised SCE that the City contractor will not be slowing down. Mayor Stubblefield asked if it was possible for SCE to give the city an update every two weeks so that the city could track the progress. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 14 of 18 Council Member Ayres stated that Ray Hicks was at the last council meeting making everyone feel good, but SCE is not making an effort, they are holding the city up. He suggested a letter be sent to the Public Utilities Commission and put them on notice. This is a seven (7) million dollar award that will provide jobs in a desperate economy. He said if the city does not get the TUMF dollars committed then another city will. The city is doing their job, but can't continue if SCE is slowing down the process. The city has waited patiently for two (2) years and it is time to go to the next level. SCE has questioned the credentials of the City Engineer in an effort to slow the process down. Council Member Potts asked City Attorney Ballinger what the city's options are for voicing a complaint. City Attorney Jeff Ballinger said that the city could file a complaint with the Public Utilities Commission; however, sending a letter directly to SCE stating that the city is holding them responsible for the costs and the liability would work as well. Council Member Potts asked if a letter to SCE was written and explained that the city's next step would be to contact the Public Utilities Commission. City Attorney Ballinger responded that would be the process, or it would be within the city's rights to relocate the poles themselves. Mayor Stubblefield commented that the city does need to move forward with the project; this bid will start that process. This will put SCE on notice and let them know that the city is moving forward. Council Member Potts asked if there had to be a sixty (60) day waiting period for response to the ads placed. City Engineer Motlagh stated that at a meeting on July 22, 2009, he was given Public Utility Commission (PUC) Guidelines. Those guidelines actually said it was forty-five (45) days and not sixty (60) days as he said earlier. Council Member Potts asked if this was some new precedent that SCE is testing, or is there a legal precedent for a waiting period after the notice? City Attorney Ballinger said that if the public utility is moving the poles they have to comply with the PUC Guidelines, which means noticing and the waiting period. Having no requests to speak Mayor Stubblefield brought this item back to council for discussion and a motion. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 15 of 18 M/S/C (Ayres/Potts) moved to approve the advertisement for Bids for the Sanderson Avenue Widening Project (CIP 06-146) as presented with the addition that the city will send a letter to SCE and send a copy to the Public Utility Commission if no action is seen within forty-five (45) days. Motion carried 5-0 Ayes: Ayres, Di Memmo, Mansperger, Potts, Stubblefield, Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.8 Warren Road Paving — Approval of Funding and Road Closure / Approve / City Engineer City Engineer Motlagh presented the staff report. He said that this job would be working closely with the City of Hemet to utilize their contractor and to pay a portion of Warren Road which has contiguous jurisdiction. Because the contractor is committed to them to do the work on their side, it is a good idea to utilize their contractor to work on the San Jacinto side. City Engineer Motlagh asked the council to approve the road closure and to commit funds in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars to pay for the portion of the work for San Jacinto. Council Member Ayres said this is an excellent use of these dollars. He said that he would like to see more collaboration with the City of Hemet on transportation issues. Having no requests to speak Mayor Stubblefield brought this item back to council for discussion and a motion. M/S/C (Ayres/Stubblefield) moved to approve funding and road closure for Warren Road. Motion carried 5-0 Ayes: Ayres, Di Memmo, Mansperger, Potts, Stubblefield, Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.9 Bus Shelter Advertising Agreement / Approve / Public Works Director Public Works Director Mike Emberton presented the staff report. He said that he had a request from a company to advertise on a shelter at a reduced rate. Public Works Director Emberton asked that the council approve the agreement to advertise at a lower rate due to the current economy. Vice Mayor Mansperger asked which shelters this request for a reduction in fees would include. City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 16 of 18 Public Works Director Emberton stated that it could be any of the shelters along State Street; however the company that has expressed interest has not chosen a particular site. Vice Mayor Mansperger stated that he would like to keep the shelter that is located on the east side of State Street just north of Seventh open because of visibility. He said that it is a great thing to lower the cost as something is better than nothing. Council Member Ayres said that the Transportation Subcommittee has recommended to the Public Works Director to have that particular shelter relocated. It should be moved further down the street. He said that dropping the fee for advertising is a good idea. M/S/C (Mansperger/Ayres) moved to approve the Bus Shelter Advertising Agreement. Motion carried 5-0 Ayes: Ayres, Di Memmo, Mansperger, Potts, Stubblefield, Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None Item 5.3 was heard at this time 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Sub -Committee and/or Agency Agendas / Receive and File / City Clerk Council Member Ayres said he would like to see two items on the agenda in September. He would like to see a report and update from Code Enforcement. The other item is the use by Valley Wide Parks and Recreation of Millett Park and the pool. He said he would like see a break down to know who is paying for the electricity and water for the vendors who are cooking food. Council Member Potts said the entire Valley Wide program should be on the agenda so that all parks could be looked at; not only those two. Council Member Ayres said that a Transportation Subcommittee meeting is scheduled on August 17, 2009 to bring back to the council a resolution to send to the board of Supervisors requesting to keep Gilman Springs Road open for public travel between State Street to Sanderson. There is discussion on the street that the City of San Jacinto supports closure of Gilman Springs Road in that area. The city's position from the beginning has to keep a tax payer, paid for, road open. Council Member Ayres asked that tonight's meeting be adjourned in honor of City Manager Barry McClellan's daughter Jennie Lynn McClellan who passed away recently as well as Mrs. McClellan's step -father George Seyarto that passed away last Friday. He also would like to see a set of minutes and recognition sent to the family of Major Bob Otta who passed away last week. He said that Major Otta was great patriot, Pearl Harbor survivor, a City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 17 of 18 Postmaster here in San Jacinto. Not long ago Council Members Mansperger and Ayres had the opportunity to take Major Otta to lunch and show him the park and fountain with his name on it. Council Member Ayres asked that copies of the minutes be sent to the McClellan and Otta families. Vice Mayor Mansperger thanked Public Works Director and his staff for a doing a great job on the Fourth of July Parade and celebration. He had the pleasure of attending the Soboba Fee to Trust Scoping Session meeting last night. It was a great meeting and there was definitely overwhelming concerns from the citizens. Mayor Stubblefield did a great job representing the city. He attended the Pre -Development Subcommittee meeting last month. There is still a lot of interest in the valley. Council Member Potts said he attended the Soboba Fee to Trust Scoping Session meeting as well and thanked city staff and City Attorney Ballinger for putting together a very professional presentation. He also attended the Transportation Subcommittee meeting and asked Assistant City Manager Hults to look into getting an updated letter from Cal -Fire regarding what the consequences would be in closing Gilman Springs Road and making it private and what it would do to the response time. He attended the Transportation Subcommittee meeting, but nothing to report. There have been several ribbon cuttings for the San Jacinto Chamber of Commerce. He also attended the sexual harassment workshop presented by the City Attorney's office. At the WRCOG meeting the Riverside County Board of Supervisors has asked WRCOG to look at the TUMF fee structure. He attended National Night Out which is a national program to get people out and be aware of supporting the law enforcement agencies. Council Member Di Memmo said that he attended the International Rotary on August 5, 2009. He said that the Rotary is contemplating starting a foundation for City Manager McClellan's daughter. He said that some constituents were calling regarding people cutting up fruit on the streets and ice cream carts around. He asked that these items be addressed when the other items for Code Enforcement were looked at. Mayor Stubblefield thanked everyone who participated in the Soboba Fee to Trust Scoping Session last night. He commented that everyone did a great job in representing the city. He requested that a Special Events Committee Meeting be schedule to discuss some upcoming items City Attorney Ballinger stated that there is an item that needs to be included in closed session. Because this information was brought to the attention of staff after the agenda was posted it is authorized to be added to the agenda tonight by a two-thirds vote. It involves the conference with real property negotiators. The property is located at 1155 S. State Street, the negotiating parties are the Assistant City Manager Tim Hults and City Council Minutes August 6, 2009 Page 18 of 18 James Antonian on behalf of the property owner and it is regarding price and terms of payment. M/S/C (Mansperger/Ayres) moved to approve the addition to closed session of the conference with real property negotiators regarding property located at 1155 S. State Street to the agenda. Motion carried 5-0 Ayes: Ayres, Di Memmo, Mansperger, Potts, Stubblefield, Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 7 CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9: One (1) case 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) Name of Case: City of San Jacinto v. Acting Pacific Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs (Docket No. IBIA 08-122-A) 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNCEL — CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (1155 S. State Street) 8. ADJOURNMENT - In honor of Jennie Lynn McClellan, George Seyarto, and Major Bob Otta. Having no further business before the Council, Mayor Stubblefield adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m. ATTEST: Barry McClellan, City Clerk City of San Jacinto Dale Stubblefield, Mayor Approved as read: Approved as amended: AGENDA ITEM _3A.4_ September 3, 2009 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Continuance of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency due to the Severe High and Damaging Winds RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve the continuance of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency due to the Severe High and Damaging Winds. DISCUSSION: On October 26, 2007, the City Council approved Resolution No. 3117 proclaiming and ratifying the existence of a local emergency, as issued by the Director of Emergency Services/City Manager and resulting from the extreme high and damaging winds that began on or about 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on October 21, 2007. Government Code section 8630 requires the City Council to review, at its regularly scheduled meetings until the local emergency is terminated, the need for continuing the local emergency. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Consent to the continuance of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency (Staff Recommendation). 2) Do Not Consent to the continuance. FISCAL IMPACT: The City's ability to obtain or continue to receive federal, state or regional disaster/emergency relief funding may be impacted if the City Council does not Consent to continue the proclamation of the local state of emergency. Substantial budgetary impacts are apparent for recovery efforts to include substantial employee overtime salaries; purchases of materials, supplies and equipment; use of private contractors/force labor; and other repairs to city right-of-way facilities (Preliminary estimates range from thirty five to fifty thousand dollars). Budgetary assistance and reimbursement is available from Federal Emergency Management Agency (F.E.M.A.) for related costs for limited recovery efforts to critical infrastructure including: electrical, power, telecommunications, water supply, public safety, and transportation. ATTACHMENT: ■ Resolution No. 3117 Page 1 of 1 Approvals City Manager: Finance Director:M..., STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. 3117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO CONFIRMING THE CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES' PROCLAMATION OF EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY WHEREAS, section 2.36.060(A)(1) of the San Jacinto Municipal Code empowers the Director of Emergency Services/City Manager to proclaim a local emergency if the City Council is not in session and requires that the City Council shall take action to ratify the proclamation within seven days thereafter; and WHEREAS, conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City of San Jacinto, as a result of due to severely high and damaging winds commencing on or about 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on the 21st day of October, 2007, at which time the City Council of the City of San Jacinto was not in session; and WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find that the above described conditions of extreme peril did warrant and necessitate the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency in the vicinity of San Jacinto; and WHEREAS, the City Manager acting as the Director of Emergency Services did proclaim the existence of a local emergency within the City on the 22nd day of October, 2007. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto that the Proclamation of Existence of a Local Emergency, as issued by the Director of Emergency Services/City Manager, is hereby ratified and confirmed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the local emergency shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, and that until such time, the City Council shall review, at each of its regularly scheduled meetings until the local emergency is terminated, the need for continuing the local emergency. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City staff is hereby authorized and directed to take any action that may be necessary or convenient to assist in obtaining federal, state or regional disaster/ emergency relief funding. Page 1 of 2 APPROVED, PASSED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a special meeting of said Council held on the 26th day of October 2007, by the following vote: Ayes Ayres, Mansperger, Stubblefield Nays None Absent Carlson, Ritchie Abstain None ATTEST: D. rothy Cho; inard, City Clerk Page 2 of 2 City of San Jacinto APPROVED AS TO FORM: BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP Ballinger, City Attorney