Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 11/17/2005 REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: SUBJECT:_(1J[T`( DATE: I( • I1 IN FAVOR: O NEUTRAL: Ql IN OPPOSITION: Ji Name: V-1I), poi;. Representing: r (JOL^ J ,C 1,1 Address: 413J�J0 cit(fbbuJ C� r City: 4. "( Telephone No.: 9 5 f 4(- )( D Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. \\ L CDC\' REQUEST TO SPEAK CIT COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: /07/°S SUBJECT: C C u4,/ boo{v►a4►ts,coN:litit01� DATE: G nd rest-a 14AI tx*) IN FAVOR: ❑ NEUTRAL: IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Name: J1E jit/AG 00 04.19 v,4!'Q cv /� Representing: ✓J c:JMA-NC70 ,an/E a Address: 5i�'6i T City: 5/4/ ,l flc'W/O Telephone No.: ( 5( VI' -o/a5 Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: a SUBJECT: ATE DATE: IN FAVOR: 0 NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: 0 Name: Representing: Address: �� Y''` City: c , - Telephone No.:Cj' - 6 4' Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: 5 . \ SUBJECT: DATE: \\/ \-I IN FAVOR: Z1 NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Name: LL: sc;v kQcc Representing: Address: as � ��1c� .:� s ‘.c \Cc City: - Telephone No.: CNNt�\ ���,- Y v �'�°1� P 1, � 00 1 (sr Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: • I SUBJECT: j,. 0 0 f / / DATE: lV I7P IN FAVOR: i) NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Name: MENN Representing: 4/F-P L rrrj' — Jr Address: T%-)11 I i PO- City: } VWk qixi Telephone No.: CM11 L l I Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 17, 2005, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation 1 .4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Legislative Update / Assemblyman Russ Bogh 1.5.2 Business Spotlight of the Month / Bedrock Ready Mix / Economic Development Specialist 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the City Council. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. If an item is pulled, it will be heard at the end of number '5. City Departments.' 3.1 Warrants at 11/17/05 / Approve / Finance Director 3.2 Request from Central County United Way for 205h Annual Tinsel Triathlon / Appropriate $2,500 from the Undesignated, City Council Agenda November 17, 2005 Page 2 of 5 Unreserved General Fund to participate as a 'Silver Sponsor' / Approve / City Manager 3.3 Purchase of EMWD (Eastern Municipal Water District) water / Approve and appropriate to pay for the July and August 2005 water purchased per budget from the Water Enterprise Fund / Public Works Director 3.4 Road Dedication — Santa Fe Street north of Midway Street / Accept a 3' road dedication from Nelson Development LLC within the western line boundaries of APN 439-120-031 3.5 Bond Reductions Final Tract Map 30770 — Pacific Trades Inc / City Engineer 1) Accept the public improvements installed by Pacific Trades Inc for Final Tract Map 30770 2) Authorize a 75% bond reduction of Labor and Performance Bonds — 25% guarantee bond remains in effect until November 17, 2006 3) Direct the City Clerk to notify developer and surety Company of City's action 3.6 Professional Services Agreement (PSA) regarding planning and environmental services for Rocky Hollow Mine RGP Planning and Development Services 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Public Hearing for the selection of projects and programs and activities for Fiscal Year 2006-2006 / Community Development Director 1) Approve the community service programs and activities to be sponsored by non-profit organizations and funded for FY 2006- 2007 2) Approve the community facilities projects to be sponsored through the City of San Jacinto and funded for FY 2006-2007 5. CITY DEPARTMENTS At the end of the scheduled City Department items, anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor; state their name, City Council Agenda November 17, 2005 Page 3 of 5 address, and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 LAFCO Presentation / Direct staff as appropriate / Community Development Director 5.2 Resolution No. / A Resolution consenting to the relinquishment of portions of certain State Highway Route 79 by the State of California within the City of San Jacinto / Approve and Adopt / City Engineer 5.3 West San Jacinto Fire Station Bid Award / Project Number 05- 122 1) Appropriate $740,300 loan from the City's General Fund 2) Appropriate $500,000 from CFD 2003-1 operations 3) Award Public Works Contract to Erickson Hall in the sum of $2,6783,000 plus 10% contingency for West San Jacinto Fire Station 4) Authorize the Mayor to execute the public works contract with Erickson Hall 5) Direct City Clerk to reject the other bids received 5.4 Mitigation of nuisance flows on Hewitt Street between Park Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue / 1) Approve and appropriate $17,000 loan for construction of cross gutter and spandrel at intersection of Hewitt and Washington 2) Approve and appropriate $35,000 for 50% share in cost of improvements to intersection of Hewitt and Park as well as Tract 29917 in-tract basin, utilizing Maine Street storm drain funds / City Engineer 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Committee and/or Agency Agendas / Receive and File / City Clerk 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 Property: APN 437-045-011 Agency Negotiators: Barry McClellan, City Manager and representative(s) from the City Attorney's Office City Council Agenda November 17, 2005 Page 4 of 5 Negotiating Parties: La Donna R. Davis Under Negotiation: Price and Terms 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 Property: APNs 437-045-014, 437-045-015, and 437-045-021 Agency Negotiators: Barry McClellan, City Manager and representative(s) from the City Attorney's Office Negotiating Parties: Rockne Joe Marley and Patricia Walsh Marley Under Negotiation: Price and Terms 7.3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 Property: APNs 437-045-005, 437-045-017, and 437-045-018 Agency Negotiators: Barry McClellan, City Manager and representative(s) from the City Attorney's Office Negotiating Parties: Cindy Patricia Fite Under Negotiation: Price and Terms 7.4 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 Property: APNs 437-045-016 Agency Negotiators: Barry McClellan, City Manager and representative(s) from the City Attorney's Office Negotiating Parties: Vernon Ringham Under Negotiation: Price and Terms 7.5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 Property: APNs 437-045-019 Agency Negotiators: Barry McClellan, City Manager and representative(s) from the City Attorney's Office Negotiating Parties: Alice P. Hernandez Under Negotiation: Price and Terms 7.6 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 Property: APNs 437-045-001 Agency Negotiators: Barry McClellan, City Manager and representative(s) from the City Attorney's Office Negotiating Parties: Efrain J. Lopez Under Negotiation: Price and Terms City Council Agenda November 17,2005 Page 5of5 7.7 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 Property: APNs 437-045-009 and 437-045-010 Agency Negotiators: Barry McClellan, City Manager and representative(s) from the City Attorney's Office Negotiating Parties: Tung Thanh Le / Tuyet Hong T. Nguyen Under Negotiation: Price and Terms 8. ADJOURNMENT If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council(c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing. CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS:Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at(951) 537- 6358, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. I, (Dorothy L. CFiouinard, City CCerk.of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby cert that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this 11 th day of November, 2005 as required by raw. Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Crerk AGENDA ITEM 3.1 November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bernie Simon Finance Director SUBJECT: Approve Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve the warrant register for the warrants and prepaid items and payroll checks issued since the last Council meeting, for the period ending November 17, 2005 BACKGROUND: The following are the warrant and check numbers for this cycle: Warrant/Prepaid#s Cycle Dates Payroll Checks Cycle Date 73018-73171 , November 17, 2005 17397-17460 November 17, 2005 Payroll information is available for Council review in the Finance Department. JUSTIFICATION: All warrants, pre-paid checks and payroll checks require Council approval. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted to cover the subject expenses. ATTACHMENTS: 1 — Detailed listing of invoices paid and warrant register. ApprovalsCity Manager ?;" Finance Director: Page 1 of 1 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total . 73020 10/28/05 A.j. business machines 10895 Office equipment repair 010-2500-425.33-30 85.00 85.00 73021 10/28/05 A 1 lock & key service 30710 322 main/lock services 010-1400-414.40-01 208.05 208.05 73022 10/28/05 Al's kubota tractor 198139 Supplies 010-7100-410.21-80 6.85 6.85 73023 10/28/05 Alert barricade, inc. 202-952 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 51.29 51.29 73024 10/28/05 American citi corp. 1057 08/05 car wash 010-3300-431.33-50 18.96 156.91 1057 08/05 car wash 010-1700-417.33-50 112.00 1057 08/05 car wash 010-3320-431.33-50 20.96 1057 08/05 car wash 010-1400-414.33-50 4.99 73025 10/28/05 American forensic nurses 20803 Analysis 010-3100-431.34-05 162.50 162.50 73026 10/28/05 Anady's trophies 53847 Supplies 010-1100-411.21-10 124.99 124.99 73027 10/28/05 Apple-one employment services CA-4799985 10/08/05 temp employees 010-3300-431.30-90 1,029.20 1,029.20 73028 10/28/05 Applied earthworks inc. 1248-03 08/05 historic strc repor 028-6500-425.40-01 1,210.56 1,210.56 73029 10/28/05 Archive management service 0014332 10/05 storage supplies 010-2500-425.30-90 64.19 64.19 73030 10/28/05 Arrow printing 4399 Office supplies 010-1700-417.21-10 68.60 205.80 4399 Office supplies 010-3300-431.21-10 68.60 4399 Office supplies 096-1700-417.21-10 68.60 73031 10/28/05 At&t REQUEST 10/27/5 09/05 telephone 010-2500-425.35-16 26.38 234.80 REQUEST 10/27/5 09/05 telephone 010-3100-431.35-16 43.61 REQUEST 10/27/5 09/05 telephone 010-7400-425.35-16 23.45 REQUEST 10/27/5 09/05 telephone 010-4150-410.35-16 70.68 REQUEST 10/27/5 09/05 telephone 050-9000-450.35-16 70.68 73032 10/28/05 B &w pipe & supply 71796 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 215.51 455.25 71720 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 158.66 71797 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 81.08 73033 10/28/05 Barrow construction inc. REQEUST 10/17/5 Ramirez-550 w main street 099-9700-470.40-01 14,732.00 14,732.00 73034 10/28/05 Blue ribbon plumbing 96023 322 main-plumbing service 010-1400-414.40-01 199.95 199.95 73035 10/28/05 California contractors supplies, 85826 Uniform supplies 010-4150-410.21-14 615.40 615.40 73036 10/28/05 Cynthia ann clarke 2005-14 09/03/05-10/06/05 service 010-3300-431.30-90 560.00 560.00 Page 1 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total I 73037 10/28/05 Data code 17630 Office equipment 050-1400-414.40-45 244.96 734.86 17630 Office equipment 055-1400-414.40-45 244.95 17630 Office equipment 059-1400-414.40-45 244.95 73038 10/28/05 David evans and associates, inc. 177522 07/31/05-08/27/05 enviro 010-1700-417.30-90 1,414.90 11,947.94 179014 08/28/05-09/24/05 enviro 010-1700-417.30-90 437.64 18-179015 08/28/05-09/24/05 enviro 083-4150-410.40-01 2,671.06 179016 08/28/05-09/24/05 enviro 083-4150-410.40-01 7,424.34 73039 10/28/05 Dell H71503897 Computer equipment 010-1400-414.40-45 1,419.99 1,419.99 73040 10/28/05 Dewey's electric 10/12/05 322 main-electrical sery 010-1400-414.40-01 449.75 1,113.80 10/19/05 248 main-electrical sery 010-1700-417.33-10 81.25 10/12/05 322 main-electrical sery 010-1400-414.40-45 298.20 10/10/05 322 main-electrical srvc 010-1400-414.40-01 108.15 07/15/05 Electrical services 010-3100-431.33-10 176.45 73041 10/28/05 Ferguson,praet& sherman 19029 Attorney fees 020-2200-419.30-90 264.00 312.62 19028 Attorney fees 020-2200-419.30-90 48.62 73042 10/28/05 H & I energy savers REQUEST 10/17/5 Ramirez-550 w main street 099-9700-470.40-01 1,849.00 1,849.00 73043 10/28/05 Hdl software, Ilc 0006396 License fees-new server 010-1701-417.34-05 20.00 20.00 73044 10/28/05 Hemet industrial supply 27142 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 8.99 8.99 73045 10/28/05 Hemet moving B.L.4085 322 main moving expenses 010-1400-414.40-01 2,125.00 2,125.00 73046 10/28/05 Hi-way safety 50930 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 981.71 981.71 73047 10/28/05 Hillard, kenneth jr. REQUEST 9/6/05 Reimbursement tech cert 055-4170-450.31-20 197.00 197.00 73048 10/28/05 Home depot credit services 5126267 Supplies 029-8662-417.30-90 150.45 613.63 6228539 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 -14.55 6228539 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 -14.54 6228539 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 -14.54 6228539 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 -14.54 6017827 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 119.57 6017827 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 119.57 6017827 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 119.56 Page 2 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73048... 10/28/05... Home depot credit services... 6017827 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 119.56 613.63... 6017828 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 10.78 6017828 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 10.77 6017828 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 10.77 6017828 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 10.77 73049 10/28/05 Horizon water 10/11/05 VIR LE 10/11/05 drinking water 010-3300-431.34-05 9.53 140.60 10/11/05 VIR LE 10/11/05 drinking water 010-1700-417.34-05 9.53 10/11/05 VIR LE 10/11/05 drinking water 096-1700-417.34-05 9.54 10/11/05 MODULA 10/25/05 drinking water 010-3300-431.34-05 21.00 10/11/05 PUBLIC 09/26/05 drinking water 010-4150-410.21-10 1.75 10/11/05 PUBLIC 09/26/05 drinking water 010-7100-410.21-10 1.75 10/11/05 PUBLIC 09/26/05 drinking water 050-9000-450.21-10 1.75 10/11/05 PUBLIC 09/26/05 drinking water 055-4170-450.21-10 1.75 10/11/05 POLICE 09/26/05 drinking water 010-3100-431.35-10 84.00 73050 10/28/05 I.b. reprographics 58885 Professional services 082-3200-431.40-01 2,267.21 3,853.51 58988 Professional services 082-3200-431.40-01 1,586.30 73051 10/28/05 International city/county REQUEST 10/17/5 Memberhsip dues-mcclellan 010-1200-412.30-16 1,200.00 1,200.00 73052 10/28/05 J &j automotive 020538 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 879.37 879.37 73053 10/28/05 Joe mcmillin 12512 Attorney fees 020-2200-419.30-90 2,297.00 2,297.00 73054 10/28/05 John deere landscapes 08628151 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 211.56 438.43 2 1 2 086 8 5 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 226.87 73055 10/28/05 Kammeyer&associates inc. 6437M Landscape architec srvc 010-3300-431.30-90 8,800.00 8,800.00 73056 10/28/05 Karl's tractor service 9/27/05 #2 Weed abatement 105-3320-431.34-05 200.00 350.00 9/27/05 #3 Weed abatement 105-3320-431.34-05 150.00 73057 10/28/05 Law offices of william g wheatley, 2618 Attorney fees 020-2200-419.30-90 3,514.10 3,514.10 73058 10/28/05 Logical designs, inc. 8737 As400 supplies 010-1400-414.40-45 871.06 5,591.45 8751 As400 installation 010-1400-414.40-45 2,610.27 8732 Server installation 010-1400-414.40-45 2,110.12 73059 10/28/05 Malcolm smith motorsports 99429127 Auto repair 024-3100-431.33-50 915.16 1,540.26 Page 3 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73059... 10/28/05... Malcolm smith motorsports... 99340882 Auto repair 024-3100-431.33-50 625.10 1,540.26... 73060 10/28/05 Micro mobile 13612 Repair lawn mower#451 010-4150-410.33-50 125.00 125.00 73061 10/28/05 Mission uniform services, inc. 17968933 Uniform supplies 010-4150-410.21-35 54.98 54.98 73062 10/28/05 Nbs local government solutions C09200524 10/01/05-12/31/05 adminis 046-8800-450.30-90 1,956.08 2,649.08 C09200524 10/01/05-12/31/05 adminis 200-8850-500.30-90 693.00 73063 10/28/05 Office depot 309285825-001 Office supplies 010-1400-414.40-01 591.75 591.75 73064 10/28/05 Overnight industrial 28841 Supplies 010-1700-417.21-10 21.15 63.44 28841 Supplies 096-1700-417.21-10 21.14 28841 Supplies 010-3300-431.21-10 21.15 73065 10/28/05 Paetec communications, inc. 1816246 08/22/05-9/21/05 telephon 010-3100-431.35-16 884.50 2,060.13 1822779 09/05 telephone 010-2500-425.35-16 1,175.63 73066 10/28/05 Party planners 1011 10/06/05 event 010-1100-411.31-20 160.00 160.00 73067 10/28/05 Quast tree service 10/3/2005 Clean up-1103 s. state 032-7150-410.40-01 650.00 650.00 73068 10/28/05 Ramona humane society REQUEST 10/21/5 Contribution octoberfest 010-2510-425.40-12 5,000.00 5,000.00 73069 10/28/05 Reliable XM926600 Office supplies 010-1400-414.21-10 15.07 1,968.43 XMB24500 Office supplies 010-1400-414.21-10 112.10 XMB24500 Office supplies 055-1400-414.21-10 7.73 XMB24500 Office supplies 050-1400-414.21-10 7.73 XM277600 Office supplies 010-4200-410.21-10 64.08 XNB59500 Office supplies 010-2500-425.21-10 117.99 XNB59500 Office supplies 010-3300-431.21-10 359.06 XNL86400 Office supplies 010-1700-417.21-10 166.24 XNL86400 Office supplies 010-3300-431.21-10 166.24 XNL86400 Office supplies 096-1700-417.21-10 166.24 XMN50101 Office supplies 010-2500-425.21-10 246.97 DVD46202 Office supplies 010-2500-425.21-10 419.15 DV792200 Office supplies 010-1200-412.21-10 41.34 DV792200 Office supplies 010-1100-411.21-10 56.52 DV792200 Office supplies 010-1210-412.21-10 14.24 Page 4 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total , 73069... 10/28/05... Reliable... XMB24500 Office supplies 059-1400-414.21-10 7.73 1,968.43... 73071 10/28/05 Rha landscape architects 805034 Parks masterplan 028-7100-410.40-01 38,634.78 46,773.61 905054 Parks masterplan 028-7100-410.40-01 8,138.83 73072 10/28/05 Riverside county sheriffs SH0000003895 08/05 booking fees 010-3100-431.30-19 3,753.60 3,753.60 73073 10/28/05 Riverside-san bernardino REQUEST 9/26/05 Reim cred acct #20003015 050-0000-308.09-10 75.06 75.06 73074 10/28/05 Riverside, county of TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 010-4150-410.34-05 7,018.80 7,920.00 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 309-8832-500.34-05 24.90 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 309-8832-500.34-05 24.90 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 301-8832-500.34-05 82.80 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 301-8832-500.34-05 82.80 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 312-8832-500.34-05 96.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 318-8832-500.34-05 42.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 324-8832-500.34-05 42.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 304-8832-500.34-05 27.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 310-8832-500.34-05 27.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 310-8832-500.34-05 27.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 333-8832-500.34-05 27.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 334-8832-500.34-05 27.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 335-8832-500.34-05 27.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 336-8832-500.34-05 27.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 337-8832-500.34-05 27.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 339-8832-500.34-05 27.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 342-8832-500.34-05 27.60 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 304-8832-500.34-05 22.80 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 310-8832-500.34-05 22.80 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 310-8832-500.34-05 22.80 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 333-8832-500.34-05 22.80 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 334-8832-500.34-05 22.80 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 335-8832-500.34-05 22.80 Page 5 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73074... 10/28/05... Riverside, county of... TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 336-8832-500.34-05 22.80 7,920.00... TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 337-8832-500.34-05 22.80 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 339-8832-500.34-05 22.80 TL0000002278 Traffic signal fy05 4thqr 342-8832-500.34-05 22.80 73077 10/28/05 Rkar properties REQUEST 10/21/5 11/05 rent 322 main 010-1400-414.34-50 3,450.00 3,450.00 73078 10/28/05 Rogers,anderson,malody& scott II STMT 8/31/05 Annual audit 010-1400-414.30-90 231.30 231.30 73079 10/28/05 Rosenow spevacek group inc. 16880 Indian gaming 099-1700-417.30-90 390.00 8,280.55 16882 Inclusionary housing 099-1700-417.30-90 520.00 16881 Implementaion plan 099-1700-417.30-90 80.00 16883 Senior-crisp 010-1700-417.30-90 2,906.06 16884 Rfp ramona/sanderson 010-1700-417.30-90 1,113.31 16885 Planning 010-1700-417.30-90 455.00 16886 Tt 33579 010-1700-417.30-90 758.09 16887 Tt 33716 010-1700-417.30-90 628.09 16888 Tt 33644 010-1700-417.30-90 487.50 16889 Santa fe pointe apts 010-1700-417.30-90 942.50 73080 10/28/05 Shred it 50112248 Paper destruciton 010-2500-425.21-10 75.00 75.00 73081 10/28/05 Staples credit plan 113887 Office supplies 010-1210-412.21-10 5.37 904.62 113887 Office supplies 010-1110-411.21-10 52.14 121283 Office supplies 010-1400-414.40-01 98.34 121283 Office supplies 010-1400-414.40-45 210.06 130550 Office supplies 010-1400-414.40-01 538.71 73082 10/28/05 State of california department 11/10/05 State fees mobile homes 010-3300-431.30-90 4,350.00 4,350.00 73083 10/28/05 Stirdivants shoes 216 Boot allowance-gonzales 010-4150-410.21-35 150.00 450.00 217 Boot allowance-holmes 010-4150-410.21-35 150.00 655 Boot allowance-astoga 010-4150-410.21-35 150.00 73084 10/28/05 Stk architecture, inc. 15764 09/05 reimbursable expens 082-3200-431.40-01 209.40 614.40 15765 09/05 professional sery 082-3200-431.40-01 405.00 73085 10/28/05 Strattons janitorial service 4460 09/05 cleaning fees 010-3300-431.34-05 150.00 150.00 Page 6 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73086 10/28/05 Stull, pamela REQUEST 10/17/5 Mileage riembursement �010-4200-410.31-20 54.55 54.55 73087 10/28/05 Tri-lake consultants, inc. 3487 108/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 010-4100-410.30-90 4,300.02 80,401.85 3488 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 010 1700 417.30 90 3,960.00 3488 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 065-0000-201.08-10 960.00 3488 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 010-1700-417.30-90 3,000.00 3488 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 065-0000-201.08-85 2,880.00 3489 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 010-1700-417.30-90 1,775.00, 3490 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 029-8662-417.30-90 12,024.00 3491 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 039-4155-410.40-01 160.00 3492 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 052-9000-450.40-01 120.00 3493 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 052-9000-450.40-01 2,945.00 3494 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 083-4150-410.40-01 2,040.00 3495 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 083-4150-410.40-01 1,055.00 3496 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 041-4155-410.40-01 662.25 3497 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 039-4155-410.40-01 95.00 3498 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 039-4155-410.40-01 240.00. 3500 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 010-4149-410.40-01 4,480.00 3501 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 082-3200-431.40-01 200.00 3502 Engineering services 065-0000-201.06-47 335.00 3503 Engineering services 041-4155-410.40-01 160.00 3504 08/06/05-09/02/05 engnrng 065-0000-201.06-47 13,513.07 3505 Engineering services 065-0000-201.06-47 8,325.23 3506 Engineering services 065-0000-201.06-47 14,630.45 3507 .Engineering services i065-0000-201.06-47 2,541.831 73089 10/28/05 Valley chronicle, the STMT 10/03/05 Advertisement 010-1700-417.36-25 1,017.00 1,036.00 10/01/05 Subscription 010-2500-425.21-10 19.00 73090 10/28/05 Valley service connection 2821 09/05 main st clean up 010-7100-410.34-05 1,039.50 1,512.00 2821 09/05 virgina lee parking 010-2500-425.33-10 472.50 73091 10/28/05 Vista paint 52007872 Supplies 010-7101-410.33-30 37.10 37.10 Page 7 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73092 10/28/05 Western riverside council REQUEST 10/3/05 09/05 tumf fees 065-0000-201.08-80 231,151.78 231,151.78 73093 10/28/05 Xerox corporation 12373153 Lease on copier 010-3100-431.34-05 185.28 185.28 73094 10/28/05 3-m company SS83983 System for traffic signal 010-4149-410.40-01 40,000.00 44,478.13 SS83983 System for traffic signal 022-4150-410.40-01 4,478.13 73095 11/2/05 Roark merrill 32115 Service rendered 322 main 010-1400-414.40-01 10,202.74 10,202.74 73098 11/4/05 Aflac REQUEST 11/3/05 10/05 insurance premium 085-0000-202.21-27 1,372.52 1,372.52 73099 11/4/05 Andre landscaping service, inc. 8995 09/05 maintenance 301-8833-500.34-05 275.00 825.00 9098 10/05 maintenance 301-883 -50 4 3 0 3 05 550.00 73100 11/4/05 Auto glass pros 9/22/05 Install windshield 010-4150-410.33-50 150.00 150.00 73101 11/4/05 Bernard, loren I REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep#00000543 050-0000-229.08-70 32.66 32.66 73102 11/4/05 Blue ribbon plumbing 96033 322 main plumbing service 010-1400-414.40-01 1,678.61 1,678.61 73103 11/4/05 C r& r incorporated REQUEST 10/24/5 09/05 trash/recycling 059-8052-450.34-05 124,323.89 107,779.16 REQUEST 10/24/5 09/05 franchise fees 059-8052-450.34-05 -16,544.73 73104 11/4/05 California society of 36753 01/01/06-12/31/06 dues 010-1400-414.30-16 100.00 100.00 73105 11/4/05 Calpers REQUEST 11/3/05 10/13/05 ty3 contribution 085-0000-202.21-28 16,296.92 16,296.92 73106 11/4/05 Clark's towing and recovery S12176 Towing service 050-9000-450.33-50 50.00 50.00 73107 11/4/05 Cosentini, peter a. REQUEST 11/1/05 11/05 reimbursement 010-1200-412.11-17 837.03 837.03 73108 11/4/05 Cutting edge staffing 19786 10/05/05 temp employees 010-1400-414.10-04 837.00 7,585.88 19786 10/05/05 temp employees 050-9000-450.10-04 288.00 19786 10/05/05 temp employees 010-3300-431.30-90 6,172.88 19786 10/05/05 temp employees 055-4170-450.10-04 288.00 73109 11/4/05 E.s. babcock & sons, inc. A151678-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 20.00 530.00 AJ51299-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 60.00 A151703-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 60.00 AJ51241-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 20.00 AJ50778-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 60.00 AJ50889-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 20.00 A152214-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 30.00 Page 8 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73109... 11/4/05... E.s. babcock & sons, inc.... A151283-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 60.00 530.00... A151372-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 90.00 A151881-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 90.00 A151400-0278 Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 20.00 73110 11/4/05 Eastern municipal water district 08/21/05 193490 08/05 water 050-9000-450.35-20 26,755.78 26,755.78 73111 11/4/05 Eastern municipal water district 10/11/05 813770 10/05 water 025-7251-410.35-10 992.75 1,347.05 10/11/05 921780 10/05 water 025-7250-410.35-10 12.66 10/11/05 907950 10/05 water 025-7250-410.35-10 119.42 10/11/05 850010 10/05 water 025-7250-410.35-10 15.69 10/11/05 919980 10/05 water 025-7100-410.35-10 49.09 10/13/05 149042 10/05 water 025-7250-410.35-10 27.18 10/10/05 158865 10/05 water 025-7250-410.35-10 37.11 10/10/05 953990 10/05 water 025-7250-410.35-10 20.87 10/10/05 437960 10/05 water 025-7250-410.35-10 72.28 73112 11/4/05 Eye care of america REQUEST 11/3/05 11/05 vision premium 085-0000-202.21-35 533.49 585.24 REQUEST 11/3/05 11/05 vision premium 010-1200-412.11-17 16.40 REQUEST 11/3/05 11/05 vision premium 065-0000-201.08-64 35.35 73113 11/4/05 Gantenbein, donald REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep#00001407 050-0000-229.08-70 134.01 134.01 73114 11/4/05 Hach company 4429285 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 169.10 169.10 73115 11/4/05 Hartford life insurance companies REQUEST 11/3/05 10/13/05 grp# 109947 085-0000-202.21-29 2,003.84 2,003.84 73116 11/4/05 Hemet industrial supply 27148 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 6.03 6.03 73117 11/4/05 Hemet rubber stamp 47259 Supplies 010-1400-414.21-10 31.25 31.25 1 73118 11/4/05 Hemet valley pipe &supply 94016 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 17.95 114.09 94016 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 17.94 94016 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 17.94 94016 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 17.94 94870 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 42.32 73119 11/4/05 Hemet, city of REQUEST 10/24/5 12/05 christmas parade 010-1100-411.21-10 20.00 20.00 73120 11/4/05 Hernandez,jose REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep #60018009 050-0000-229.08-70 0.74 0.74 Page 9 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73121 11/4/05 Home depot credit services 3228639 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 -11.30 862.37 3228639 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 -11.30 3228639 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 -11.30 3228639 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 -11.30 4118414 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 39.21 4118414 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 39.20 4118414 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 39.20 4118414 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 39.20 3126461 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 54.82 3126461 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 54.82 3126461 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 54.82 9268122 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 18.65 9268122 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 18.65 9268122 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 18.65 9268122 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 18.65 7232891 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 96.76 6017866 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 63.10 6017866 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 63.09 6017866 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 63.09 6017866 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 63.09 5214553 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 -17.58 5214553 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 -17.58 5214553 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 -17.58 5214553 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 -17.58 5029253 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 44.52 5029253 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 44.52 5029253 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 44.52 5029253 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 44.51 3126461 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 54.82 Page 10 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73124 11/4/05 Hughes supply inc. S120226277.001 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 46.33 46.33 73125 11/4/05 Infosend inc. 18972 08/05 postage 059-1400-414.21-10 3,862.30 3,862.30 73126 11/4/05 Kammeyer& associates inc. 6439G 08/05 plan check 065-0000-201.06-20 1,320.00 14,080.00 6440G 08/05 plan check 065-0000-201.06-20 660.00 6441G 08/05 plan check 065-0000-201.06-20 1,210.00 6442G 08/05 plan check 065-0000-201.06-20 1,760.00 6445G 08/05 plan check 065-0000-201.06-20 2,200.00 6446G 08/05 plan check 065-0000-201.06-20 660.00 6448G 08/05 plan check 065-0000-201.06-20 880.00 6450G 08/05 plan check 065-0000-201.06-20 4,620.00 6451 G 08/05 plan check 065-0000-201.06-20 770.00 73127 11/4/05 Kerns, pauline REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep#00000799 050-0000-229.08-70 96.25 96.25 73128 11/4/05 La chemcial 11827 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 2,127.53 9,226.18 12264 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 2,200.91 15045 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 2,403.39 16324 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 2,494.35 73129 11/4/05 Lincoln life REQUEST 11/3/05 10/13/05 deffered comp 085-0000-202.21-29 110.00 110.00 73130 11/4/05 Martinez, casey REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep #00000642 050-0000-229.08-70 3.52 3.52 73131 11/4/05 Mcclellan, barry REQUEST 10/24/5 Reimburse parking fees 010-1200-412.31-20 50.00 50.00 73132 11/4/05 Mission uniform services, inc. 17969812 Uniform supplies 050-9000-450.21-35 31.20 150.63 17969812 Uniform supplies 055-4170-450.21-35 12.76 17969814 Uniform supplies 010-7100-410.21-35 24.95 17969815 Uniform supplies 010-4150-410.21-35 51.19 17968937 Uniform supplies 010-7400-425.33-10 30.53 73133 11/4/05 Nextel communications 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 010-1100-411.35-17 487.45 2,579.90 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 010-1110-411.35-17 67.85 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 010-1200-412.35-17 83.03 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 010-1400-414.35-17 125.13 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 010-1700-417.35-17 85.71 Page 11 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73133... 11/4/05... Nextel communications... 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 010-3300-431.35-17 306.64 2,579.90... 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 010-4150-410.35-17 244.99 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 010-4200-410.35-17 133.12 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 010-7100-410.35-17 178.08 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 010-7101-410.35-17 58.75 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 029-8662-410.35-17 337.17 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 050-9000-450.35-17 177.12 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 055-4170-450.35-17 59.81 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 096-1700-417.35-17 130.37 781386316-046 09/05 cellular 102-1400-500.35-17 70.21 781386316-046 09/05 cellular equipment 010-4200-410.21-10 34.47 73135 11/4/05 Pacific trades REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim credit acct#00000862 050-0000-308.09-10 11.51 11.51 73136 11/4/05 Pacificare of california REQUEST 11/3/05 11/05 health ins premium 085-0000-202.21-39 24,907.52 25,907.68 REQUEST 11/3/05 11/05 health ins premium 065-0000-201.08-64 1,000.16 73137 11/4/05 Pre-paid legal services, inc. REQUEST 11/3/05 10/05 payments 085-0000-202.21-87 89.76 89.76 73138 11/4/05 Preferred benefit insurance admin.REQUEST 11/3/05 11/05 dental premium 085-0000-202.21-32 2,652.07 2,881.64 REQUEST 11/3/05 11/05 dental premium 010-1200-412.11-17 97.46 REQUEST 11/3/05 11/05 dental premium 065-0000-201.08-64 132.11 73139 11/4/05 Quality auto parts D773620 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-50 21.09 197.57 D773527 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-50 7.40 D774558 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-50 1.61 D776563 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-50 9.22 D777197 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-50 4.82 D783680 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-50 2.14 D778219 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-50 12.05 D784939 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-50 15.07 D789607 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 8.92 D789743 Supplies 056-4150-410.33-50 12.23 D791181 Supplies 056-4150-410.33-50 5.85 Page 12 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73139... 11/4/05... Quality auto parts... D791277 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-50 2.13 197.57... D791786 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 27.95 D792942 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-50 1.71 D793071 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 24.77 D794989 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-50 15.02 D795566 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 5.92 D794137 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 7.84 D768644 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-50 11.83 73141 11/4/05 Ramona tire 150997 Auto repair 050-9000-450.33-50 108.57 108.57 73142 11/4/05 Reliable XNK23700 Office supplies 010-4200-410.21-10 59.72 267.47 XNF31900 Office supplies 010-4200-410.21-10 9.89 XNF31900 Office supplies 010-4200-410.21-10 197.86 73143 11/4/05 Richardson, cara REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep #00001591 050-0000-229.08-70 92.98 92.98 73144 11/4/05 Roark merrill 32115 Service renderd 322 main 010-1400-414.40-01 10,202.74 10,202.74 73145 11/4/05 San jacinto petty cash, city of REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 010-1100-411.31-20 15.00 156.58 REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 010-1200-412.21-10 3.19 REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 010-1200-412.31-15 10.01 REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 010-1400-414.21-10 2.58 REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 010-1400-414.40-01 17.35 REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 010-1700-417.31-20 45.00 REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 010-2500-425.21-10 10.76 REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 010-2500-425.33-50 12.77 REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 010-2500-425.33-50 15.36 REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 010-4150-410.31-20 15.00 REQUEST 10/24/5 10/05 reim petty cash 096-1700-417.21-10 9.56 73146 11/4/05 San jacinto ry REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep #10005552 050-0000-229.08-70 180.00 180.00 73147 11/4/05 Sandoval, claudia REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep#20008009 050-0000-229.08-70 15.74 15.74 73148 11/4/05 Sawaya, souheil REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep #00001519 050-0000-229.08-70 67.21 67.21 73149 11/4/05 Service employees international REQUEST 11/3/05 10/05 association dues 085-0000-202.21-43 686.40 686.40 Page 13 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73150 11/4/05 Shademaker, inc. 09/30/2005 City hall 201 main-awning 010-2500-425.33-10 650.00 650.00 73151 11/4/05 Smart &final 19095 Supplies 010-4150-410.40-01 29.62 118.48 19095 Supplies 010-7100-410.40-01 29.62 19095 Supplies 050-9000-450.40-01 29.62 19095 Supplies 055-4170-450.40-01 29.62 73152 11/4/05 Standard insurance, the REQUEST 11/3/05 11/05 life,std,ltd,ad&d 085-0000-202.21-46 3,585.50 3,585.50 73153 11/4/05 Staples credit plan 51334 Office supplies 010-2500-425.21-10 48.01 84.08 51333 Office supplies 010-1110-411.21-10 36.07 73154 11/4/05 State of california REQUEST 10/18/5 Renewal fees-b. mulcock 010-4150-410.30-16 60.00 60.00 73155 11/4/05 State of california dept of justice 542477 09/05 fingerprint apps 010-1210-412.30-90 32.00 32.00 73156 11/4/05 Stull, pamela REQUEST 10/28/5 Empl holiday breakfast 010-2500-425.31-20 600.00 600.00 73157 11/4/05 Target national bank REQUEST 11/1/05 C. bohn-emply computer 065-0000-103.12-25 1,752.79 1,752.79 73158 11/4/05 Texaco fleet management 8000235278510 09/05 gasoline 010-4150-410.21-70 917.04 2,184.54 8000235278510 09/05 gasoline 056-4150-410.21-70 948.41 8000235278510 09/05 gasoline 055-4170-450.21-70 319.09 73159 11/4/05 The cad zone inc. 20068 Software upgrade 010-3200-431.40-45 309.00 309.00 20068 Software upgrade 065-0000-201.08-77 309.00 20068 Software upgrade 010-0000-304.03-32 -309.00 73160 11/4/05 Town &country golf cars 09197 Golf cart batteries 050-9000-450.33-50 670.60 670.60 73161 11/4/05 Tramel, glen REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep #00001318 050-0000-229.08-70 76.55 76.55 73162 11/4/05 Union bank - corporate trust div. 5 10/01/05-09/01/06 cfd 02a 046-8800-450.30-90 3,570.00 6,750.00 4 10/01/05-09/01/06 cfd02-1 045-8800-450.30-90 1,590.00 4 10/01/05-09/01/06 cfd2002 045-8800-450.30-90 1,590.00 73163 11/4/05 United communities network REQUEST 11/3/05 10/05 contributions 085-0000-202.21-80 77.38 77.38 73164 11/4/05 Vargas, leticia REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep #00001467 050-0000-229.08-70 75.31 75.31 73165 11/4/05 Vulcan materials company 392135 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 283.47 283.47 73166 11/4/05 Wheels in motion REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep #30006091 050-0000-229.08-70 1.52 1.52 73167 11/4/05 Zavala, carmen REQUEST 10/24/5 Reim water dep #00001514 050-0000-229.08-70 23.87 23.87 Page 14 City of San Jacinto Date: 11/17/2005 Warrant Register Check Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Transaction Check Number Number Amount Total 73168 11/4/05 Zimmerman consulting engineers 1849 Plan check tract 30943-1 065-0000-201.06-45 892.00 892.00 73169 11/7/05 Hartford life insurance companies REQUEST 11/4/05 10/27/05 grp# 109947 085-0000-202.21-29 2,003.84 2,003.841 73170 11/7/05 lcma retirement trust REQUEST 11/4/05 10/27/05 deferred comp 085-0000-202.21-29 2,600.00 2,600.00 73171 11/7/05 Lincoln life REQUEST 11/4/05 10/27/05 deferred comp 085-0000-202.21-29 110.00 110.00 Total Checks 792,721.55 Page 15 AGENDA ITEM , November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Barry McClellan, City Manager �,� SUBJECT: Request for Funding from Central County United Way for 20th Annual Tinsel Triathlon RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that by motion the City Council appropriate $2,500 from the undesignated, unreserved general fund balance and participate as a "Silver Sponsor" in the 20th Annual Tinsel Triathlon. BACKGROUND: This year the Central County United Way is conducting its 20th Annual Tinsel Triathlon to be held on December 11th. This event is that organization's major annual fund raiser and provides funding for many residents and programs in our city and the valley. Historically, the city has supported this event, and it is recommended that we do so again. By being a "Silver Sponsor," the city will have its name on the back of all of the t- shirts of over 800 runners, a sign at the awards banquet, a booth at the expo, our logo on their website, and one entry into the triathlon, if so desired. JUSTIFICATION: By being a sponsor of this event, we provide support to an organization that provides services to many of our citizens all year long. It has been said that United Way services affect one person in three on a county-wide basis, and Central County United Way has 14 member agencies and sponsors four programs their self. Clearly, many San Jacinto residents are or will be beneficiaries of the United Way's programs. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The undesignated, unreserved general fund balance will be reduced by $2,500. Approvals City Manager: 4QM Finance Director: 5 Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter from Central County United Way dated October 27, 2005 2. Sponsorship Packages Information Page 2 of 2 CENTRAL COUNTY Central County United Way United • 418 East Florida Avenue, Hemet, California 92543 Wa ftsP 951.929.9691 - FAX 951.652.0064 WWW.CCUW.ORG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Chair Jan Whittaker JCPenney Chair Elect Dr.Phillip Pendley Hemet Unified School District Secretary October 27, 2005 Robert Lopez So.Calif.Edison Barry McClellan, City Manager Treasurer JaneNeales City of San Jacinto Neales Appraisals 201 East Main Street Past Chair San Jacinto, CA Roger Schultz Mt.San Jacinto College President Barry, Bob Duistermars BOARD OF DIRECTORS Jim Fredericks The 20th Annual Tinsel Triathlon is gearing up in the San Jacinto Valley. Once again, Allan Hacker Central County United Way looks to the City of San Jacinto to partner with us for this popular event. The Tinsel Triathlon raises funds and awareness for those less Pete Hewitt Hemet Chief of Police fortunate within our community. With the expansion of our community,the needs have grown as well, which is why our major fundraiser, the Tinsel Triathlon is vital to the Barbara Pritchett community. Last year, the Tinsel Triathlon brought over 800 runners to our valley, Myrna Rohr some as far away as Alaska and Michigan. This year we are seeing registrants from San Jacinto Unified School Dist. Melbourne, Australia and New York. Roland Skumawitz Romoland School District This event is set in place to not only provide a strong community supported, quality Dr.Stephen Teele event, but also to raise funds that will go right back into our community.We appreciate School Facilities Planning& the strong partnership that we have had in the past with the City of San Jacinto. Help Managment us continue this successful partnership by honouring our request for support in the MEMBER AGENCIES amount of$2,500.00. Alternatives to Domestic Violence Boy Scouts of America As always, Central County United Way commends you for your past partnerships with Center Against Sexual Assault us and truly believe that like the City of San Jacinto, we truly do make a difference in "What Matters Most". Children's Hospital LA Community Pantry Your friend at United Way, Hemet Police Activities League Hemet Youth Baseball - / ��/v`-i/ La Vista Recovery Center ( t)A,(4/ ,/� L ,,,\\,��///J/' Menifee Valley Community Cupboard Morning Sky School Connie Hall Prime of Life Community Relations Director Senior Day Care Center T.H.E.Center USO SPONSORED PROGRAMS CC, Mayo' Chris Buydos Retired&Senior Volunteer Vice Mayor Dale Stubblefield Program Councilmember Jim Ayres Foster Grandparent Program Councilmember Ken Shaw Senior Companion Program Councilmember Robert Ritchie Valley Service Connection [NVFST[NG IN WHAT MA t 1 ERS 20th Annual Tinsel Triathlon Sponsorship Packages Title Sponsor-$15,000 - Underwriter status on all printed materials - Name on front of Shirt with Triathlon Logo - Named in all related advertisements -Title Status VIP Booth at Expo - Prominent Corporate Logo/Signature/banner exposure at Finish Line -Sign at Awards Ceremony - Logo on website - Four entries into the Triathlon Platinum Sponsor- $10,000 - Platinum status on selected printed materials - Name on back of shirt as Platinum Sponsor - Platinum Status VIP Booth at Expo -Sign at Awards Banquet -Sign at finish line - Logo on website -2 entries into the Triathlon Gold Sponsor-$5,000 - Gold status printed on some materials - Name on back of shirt - Logo on website Gold Status Sponsor - Gold Status VIP booth at expo -Sign at awards banquet - 2 entries into the Triathlon Silver Sponsor- $2,500 2016 71nnua( - Name on back of shirt -Sign at Awards Banquet / _ - Booth at Expo `' - Logo on website !.• -One entry into triathlon Benefactor- $1,250 - Nameonbackofshirt -Sign at Triathlon, TINSEL - Logo on website Friend $500 TRIATHLON - Sign at Triathlon - Logo on website Expo Booth - $100 WWW.TINSELTRIATHLON AGENDA ITEM 3. 3 November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mike Emberton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Purchase of EMWD Water RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council by motion, approve an appropriation of$26,755.78 from the Water Enterprise Fund to cover the charges incurred for water purchased from Eastern Municipal Water District during July and August 2005. BACKGROUND: Originally, the well was supposed to be completed last fiscal year. Consequently, staff did not budget funding in FY 2005-2006 to purchase water from EMWD to cover the delay. Due to delays of the completion of the Lake Park Well, the City purchased water from EMWD during the July and August 2005. As part of our contract agreement with Layne Christenson (formerly Beylik Drilling), liquidated damages can be assessed for construction delays beyond the completion date. Therefore, It is understood that the contractor will be responsible for all water purchased during this time. JUSTIFICATION: Pay our financial obligation to EMWD for water purchased to serve the needs of our water service area customers while our peak water demands could not be met without Lake Park Well in operation. BUDGETARY IMPACT: It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $26,755.78 from the Water Enterprise Fund (050-9000-45-3520) to pay EMWD water bill for water purchased made between July and August 2005. ATTACHMENTS: Approvals None C City Manager: Finance Director: , Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM f November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagl�i,City Engineer SUBJECT: Road Dedication — Santa Fe Street North of Midway Street RECOMMENDATION: By motion, accept a 3' road dedication from Nelson Development LLC, for Santa Fe Avenue north of Midway Street, within western line boundaries of Assessor's Parcel Number 439-120-031 . BACKGROUND: As condition of approval for Conditional Use Permit 7-03, Nelson Development LLC was conditioned to dedicate an additional 3' along Santa Fe Avenue to accommodate ultimate right-of-way on Santa Fe of 33." Developer will dedicate and improve Santa Fe Avenue to 33' (half-width) ultimate width as part of development of a 20-unit apartment complex on the east side of Santa Fe Avenue, north of Midway Avenue. JUSTIFICATION: Accommodate the orderly development of Conditional Use Permit 7-03, and follow the City's General Plan Circulation Element guidelines. BUDGETARY IMPACT: None anticipated. ATTACHMENTS: • Road Deed from Nelson Development dated September 26, 2005 Approvals City Manager: Page 1 of 1 Finance Director: itrf Vie Recording Requested By: City of San Jacinto When Recorded Mail To: City of San Jacinto 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA. 92583 ROAD DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Nelson Development, L.L.C. Hereby GRANT(S)to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, an easement for road purposes in the following described real property in the City of San Jacinto, State of California: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A AND B Together with the right to enter upon and pass and repass over and along said easement and right of way to deposit tools, implements and other materials thereon, by said City, its officers, agents and employees and by any contractor, his agent and employees, engaged by said City, whenever and wherever necessary for the purposes above set forth. It is understood that each undersigned grantor grants only that portion of the above described land in which said „,, grantor has a ' = e� lellaill Signature: f _ STATE OF C LIIFORNIA This is to certify that the interest in real COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE property conveyed by the Deed dated from OnSE-SE me, the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A said State, personally appeared MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and/or N.J4-AiE O ./(/-E—GsO/0 Governmental Agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council on , and the Personally known to me or proved to me Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. be the person(s)whose name(s) subscribed to the within instrument and Dated: acknowledged that /fE Executed the same. By: Mayor WITNESS m hand and official seal. Signature. City Clerk ame (Typed or Printed) Date: -557°. .16E72 24 0100,5 E.STUMP _ >' Commission•1547323 i , Noialy Pubic•California i Rim**County My Como.(spins Jan 24, EXHIBIT"A" SANTA FE PALMS APARTMENTS PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF FARM LOT 79 OF THE SAN JACINTO LAND ASSOCIATION,AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8, PAGE 357 OF MAPS,RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF SANTA FE STREET,BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 79,WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF SAID FARM LOT 79; THENCE SOUTH 89°56'58"EAST,ALONG SAID NORTH LINE,A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 89°56'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE,PARALLEL AND 33.00 FEET EASTERLY OF SAID CENTER LINE OF SANTA FE STREET AND SAID WEST LINE OF FARM LOT 79, SOUTH 00°00'00"WEST A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°56'58"WEST AND PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTH LINE,A DISTANCE OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL AND 30.00 FEET EASTERLY OF SAID CENTER LINE OF SANTA FE STREET,NORTH 00°00'00' EAST A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING=600.00 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0138 ACRES MORE OR LESS SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT"B" ,LAND so ip DOUGLAS R. C R P.L.S.4611 ny EXPIRATION 09-30-2006 0 NO.4611 1?DATE: 9/15/05 * ,0 * I fl\ \ �xp.9.30-0 SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET f SHEET 1 OF > SHEETS EXHIBIT "B " PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT o II LEGEND: , POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT Q TPOB = TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING r//i AREA OF DEDICA DON u FD 1"IP RCE 11216 BASIS OF BEARINGS: OAKWOOD r/ PER PM 21968 GRID NORTH CALIFORNIA CORR. SYSTEM ZONE 6 STREET l 330.36' NORTH LINE OF SOUTH 1/2 POC TPOB {FARM LOT 79 00' N 89'56'58" W 300.00' _ _ bo 13.00' ---- ) — 1 w S 33' I z cc) 30' o Io I w g g ( APN 439-120-031 ) .( o E- oI lc,h OPeJ PORTION OF e 6 0FAFW LOT 790 o BOOK8 ecOL eV,�h1 IEPACE 357 I �z L3.00' � Q 0 WEST LINIE OF� FARM LOT 79 _ _ _ N 89'56'58" W 300.00' MIDWAY STREET ), _ LAND ti� SU. FD 1"IP ROE 1121E ��' S ih R• MF�n . PER PM 21968 - 0 `0 o * i NO.4611 1 * i,r,, T.xp.9.30.0 G. \ /4,r new,.Q- All°ham FLCF1-ORES LUNG 9-15-2005 c> ry U U I _ �I T DOUGLAS R. MEL HIOR 7220 TRADE STREET, SUITE 120. SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 DATE (858) 566-0626 FAX (858) 566-0627 PLS 4611 APPLICANT PREPARED BY: APN: NELSON DEVELOPMENT LLC. Dr R ELC R 41120 ELM STREET, SUITE H 439-120-031 MURRIETA, CA 92562 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION PLS 4611 EXP ES 9-30- 6 DATE: 9-15-2005 FLC 0516 • AGENDA ITEM . November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer 441-} SUBJECT: Reduction of Bonds — Final Tract Maps 30770 Pacific Trades, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: By motion: 1) accept the public improvements installed by Pacific Trades, Inc. associated with the development of Final Tract Map 30770; 2) authorize a 75% bond reduction of Labor and Performance Bonds; and 3) direct the City Clerk to notify developer and surety Company of City's action. A one-year 25% guarantee bond shall remain in effect until November 17, 2006. BACKGROUND: Pacific Trades, Inc. entered into a Subdivision Agreement with the City of San Jacinto associated to the recordation and development of Final Tract Map 30770, an 18-lot residential development on 4.25 acres located on the west side of Santa Fe, approximately 400' south of Seventh Street. The project has been built out and the public improvements have been completed per approved plans. The developer has obtained all the required approvals per City's administrative policy regulating the acceptance of public improvements / bond reduction. A twenty-five percent, one-year guarantee bond is being retained as security. Per Subdivision Agreement Section 3.0, developer will be responsible for the maintenance of the installed improvements during the warranty/guarantee period. Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 JUSTIFICATION Abide by the terms of the subdivision agreements entered between the City of San Jacinto and Pacific Trades, Inc., for the development of Final Tract Map 30770. BUDGETARY IMPACT Property owners in this subdivision have annexed to the City's Lighting Landscaping and Park District No. 2, and CFD 2003-1, which provide funding for the municipal services required of new developments. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Public Works Improvements Approval Sign Off Page 2 of 2 PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS APPROVAL SIGN OFF DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING THE BELOW LISTED ITEMS BEFORE SUBDIVISION BONDS CAN BE REDUCED AND THE ONE-YEAR MAINTENANCE/WARRANTY PERIOD BEGINS. C_71(00)-130:1431 SITE ADDRESS/TRACT NO. 3 D-11 0 1 1 52, n\TA 1E DEVELOPER/OWNER 1 4C-��t L `• N S • it a fJLl'Q L.L(. STATUS DEPARTMENT SIGN OFF CLEARED/PENDING/ETC. SIGNATURE DATE Landscape,Lighting,Park,Drainage,Basin,Channel Improvements CAL SENSE CERTIFICATION FOR CONTROLLER INSTALLATION AND FUNCTIONALITY(800-572-8608)(Applicable to all tracts required to install a Calsense Controller) SLL_ A''CT 4 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT(Ron Kammeyer 951-537-8585) G. 1'-` —y-C �/\ � CITY INSPECTOR(Engineering) / -� PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR rl/k . ���%�• wr CITY ENGINEER gifice COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR t / / 0,� Street,Water and Sewer Improvements FLOW TEST OF FIRE SUPPRESSION FACILITIES(Off-Site Hydrants)(Inspection with _FU �j ' - 9/z7/ J applicable water department or approved contractor as listed on page 2) Lt%A;�dD l>ihrkilAdg-TrG1,4[e FLOW TEST OF FIRE SUPPRESSION FACILITIES(On-Site Hydrants)(Inspection wih approved contractor only.See attached list of contractors) 6`,01 6_ 5I/ W,4 ( ,C(y') 9/Zl10$ LETTER APPROVING INSTALLATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF FACILITIES BY III WATER AND WASTEWATER PROVIDER(EMWD,LHMWD,or SJJWWD).Attach letters d,k, \% to check off list. In the event the project is within the San Jacinto water/wastewa et r district,the acceptance of facilities will recur after the one-year warranty period. CITY INSPECTOR(Engineering) (le/72e0) /2 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR r / CITY ENGINEER /�� / ,/ /— Items listed below are for City staff only: BOND REDUCTION REQUEST TO CITY COUNCIL(Engineering) Upon approval by city council to reduce bonds the one year maintenance/warranty period will begin) TENTATIVE WARRANTY/MAINTENANCE PERIOD END DATE(Engineering) This will occur after one year maintenance period has successfully completed and city council has approved the release of bonds. THIS APPROVAL CHECK LIST IS ONLY CONFIRMATION THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE APPLICABLE HAVE BEEN INSTALLED PER BUILDING CONDITIONS AND CITY SPECS.THIS CHECK LIST DOES NOT RELEASE RESPONSIBILITY OF MAINTENANCE AND WARRANTY OF FACILITIES FROM THE DEVELOPER.AFTER MAINTENANCE PERIOD IS OVER DEVELOPER MUST HAVE THE ACCEPTANCE CHECK LIST SIGNED OFF BY CITY STAFF IN ORDER FOR CITY TO ACCEPT AND TAKE OVER THE IMPROVEMENTS. UPON COMPLETION OF THIS FORM,RETURN TO ENGINEERING(COPY TO SPECIAL DISTRICTS) From:Steven Duff To:CHRISTINE Date 9/26/2005 Time:2 09:32 PM Page 1 of 2 FACSIMILE COVER PAGE To : CHRISTINE From : Steven Duff Sent : 9/26/2005 at 2:09:30 PM Pages : 2 (including Cover) Subject : CALSENSE CONTROLLER CERTIFICATION FOR SAN JACINTO From:Steven Duff To:CHRISTINE Date 9/26/2005 Time:2 09.32 PM Page 2 of 2 CALSENSIE CALIFORNIA SENSOR CORPORATION September 26, 2005 CITY OF SAN JACINTO Attn: CHRISTINE Re : INSPECTION OF CONTROLLERS ON SANTA FE IN SAN JACINTO A Calsense representative has participated in the inspection of the Calsense equipment installed at the above project. The findings of this inspection are that the Calsense Controllers and Flow Meters listed below were installed according to manufacturers specifications and are working properly. 1. Controller A an ET2000-8-R-RR-LR connected to a Calsense flow meter model FM-1. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please call me at (800) 572-8608. Sincerely, Steven Duff Field Service Representative Cc: file 20/S Cone Tel Nogal.SUIte N,Garlebao,CA 92111)9((RU)438-052S SEP:28-2005 12 :21 PM SHAWN-LARTIGAU 909925rar ELITE FIRE PROTECTION P.O. BOX 5299 HEMET, CA. 92545-0299 (951) 925-4554 Contractor License C-16-702152 FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA SHEET Date: 9/27/05 Owner/Responsible Party: PACIFIC TRADES CONSTRUCTION 2956 ROOSEVELT ST. UNIT #3 CARLSBAD CA. 92008 Testing Location: 752 S. SANTA FE ST. SAN JACINTO CA. (LA PERLA ) Hydrant # 1 (ON SITE) 752 S. SANTA FE ST. SAN JACINTO CA. Size of Port: 2 ''A inch Static Pressure: 65 psi Residual Pressure: 50 psi GPM: 1160 Pitot Read: 47 psi Hydrant # 2 (OFF SITE) 900 S. SANTA FE ST. SAN JACINTO CA. Size of Port: 2 '/2 inch Static Pressure: 62 psi Residual Pressure: 47 psi GPM; 1060 Pitot Read: 40 SEP-28-2005 12 :23 PM SHAWN—LARTIGAU 9099'25 genic r • - --- ELITE FIRE PROTECTION REMIT PAYMENT TO; P.O. BOX 5299 • HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92544-0299 (800) 3714554 • (951)925-4554 Lic. #C-16-702152 S.F.M. E- 1778 INVOICE NO. 23539 1 AG`Fic -TRADES Co1is7: Li p L.tL t4061A-S 7.9% A OQS Eve_LT 5' 6 QJ 52_ . S. 5AN-rA f� 5"�" t. S eh.0 C14- 97 PO P 1 g _.5A-4 z-ax4k>1 1`o cies O A-rr: ac-chs Pa1Ab It — t ia. 1, A-ry : bAvI D mit-4- Telephone NO.('' ) 30 — 7 L/3 JOB PHONE NO.('�(p) S`j �Ib$ ON O SEMI-ANNUAL PURCNAU!ORDER NO. CONTACT NAME DATE STARTED MIN.BILLING NET UPON RECEIPT 4 ANNUAL L NEW ( 760�,�0-9/O6 ERMS q�2.i-05 $50.00 [uTINOUIaNIM MAIN?. IlCN 1 01 1 Y er r III I IM TIr III 1 PO for TIM alfr TOTAL t»Nte UNIT!MCI IXTYTAX NON I IT MILS 0 TM — - fI 001IIIC1004 CJ p WATIa - I r Get CHIN ❑ 6 i , NyoaOTeST I TEAR —_ NYDROTIST 13 YEM AUTOMATIC IYSTNM MAWT, ---t ExwAuiT SYSTEM MAINT. INSPECTlOM ❑YDMTNLY ___0 QUARTERLY ❑ANNUAI- gel 8 YEAR ,❑PIR!PREVENTION TRAINlNQCIA's c SERVICE CH 4E _ REMARKS 2 1i4 e. . • %.. s F L/61.41 !r S h/ lop,'" q00-iG,A/E.Q 1 e e.tred ON At/va,-/- (FtkE_ t(6,-, .-c- nit) -�Es+ da+& ss.:tf ALS o � .-..0 4) w T --- IL\ 64Y4t SERVICE CONTRACT PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOI E TAxAst.e The authorized agent signing below Buyer agrees to pay 0 Invoice. 1 1/2%Interest %TAR tl agrees to a regular service contract per month will be charged on all past due invoices. Should this between Elite Fire Protection and the account be placed in the hands of an attorney to collect all or ' , t "Sold To"party for the"Job Site"as any portion thereof the undersigned agrees to pay such adds- TAXABLE W Indicated on this invoice. The services tional sums as and for attomey's foes and court costs. It Is thor- - and their costs are noted on lines oughly understood and agreed that the title of above goods TOTAL. above. Cancellation of this contract by shall remain in the hands of Elite Fire Protection until the full 0'si the"Sold To party must be 30 days In amount of the bill is paid. ACCEPTED BY AUTHORIZEDI. Vtl advance in writing or services will be AGENT OR BUYER. SIGNER READS AND UNDERSTANDS rendered and billed. Elite Fire Protection may cancel this AUTNORtZSD AGENT SERVICE TECNNICIAN contract at any time. The"Sold To" �A/L rr party is responsible to see that all work . Is completed by expiration date. The signature above assure,that the above stated sir• Please put our Involea number on your check. vices have Men eulhorited and rendered accordingly. I am else aware that aald service,may have been performed VitaIlihe TOW prior to thirty days of expiration. We appreciate your business. AGENDA ITEM 3. L November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tim Hults, Community Development Director' SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Planning and Environmental Services for Rocky Hollow Mine RGP Planning and Development Services RECOMMENDATION: Authorize City Manager to enter into Professional Services Agreement with RGP Planning and Development Services for planning and environmental services related to the processing of the Rocky Hollow Mine application. BACKGROUND: The City of San Jacinto has received an application for a Conditional Use Permit to authorize surface mining on approximately 220 acres in the Lakeview hills. The site in question sits just north of the Cove specific plan and west of the initial set of ridges westerly of Warren Road. Because of the complexity of the project, staff has solicited proposals from firms experienced in processing such entitlement applications. Staff received two proposals, one from RGP Planning and Development Services and one from Lilburn Corporation. The RGP proposal was more comprehensive than the Lilburn proposal in that it included case management services. The Lilburn proposal did not include such services, even though such services were requested in the RFP. Furthermore, although the RGP proposal was more costly by $1327, the cost for staff case management services would far exceed that amount. I the preparation and The cost of the RGP proposal is $135,991 and includes P P p p circulation of the EIR, responses to any comments received, the required findings of fact, the mitigation monitoring program, the notice of completion and the notice of determination. Additionally, the proposal also includes staff case management services. Approvals City Manager: /S Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 Attached to this report is the proposal from RGP showing the scope of work, the schedule of fees, and the timeline for completion of the work. The consultant will enter into a Professional Services Agreement with the City using the standard contract provided by the City Attorney's office, and executed by the City Manager. JUSTIFICATION: To appropriately respond to the entitlement application, a consulting firm experienced with mining projects is needed. RGP Planning and Development has performed similar services on over 60 mining operations in California. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The proposed cost for the needed work is $135,991. These costs will be borne by the project proponent. As such, there will be no budgetary impact. ATTACHMENTS: • Site Plan and Circulation Element showing proposed Mine Site • Proposal from RGP Planning and Development Services, including Insurance Cost Recovery request dated November 3, 2005 and revised Cost Summary • Professional Services Agreement Page 2 of 2 ,, 0 °4%- - \ ■rit 'IT L ii I // - LEGEND �y�'�/ ��� Project Boundary j Habitat I.Southern Sycamore Riparian Woodland \ 1i , Riversidean Sage Scrub 410 Riversidean Sage Scrub Disturbed �y��� �i �� O Coastal Sage Scrub/Chaparral Ecotone 9 1 = / - O Southern Mixed Chaparralpi r� ONon-native GrasslandNon-native Vegetation%� O A riculture• . I /I O DsturbedHabitat 1 110 Devel _; - O Project Impacts>� ��� \ 1 d ®CDFG Jurisdictional Area aa''. ---- ) IIt�� ----Blue Line Stream 1.19/0 ' ,' \, \ .... - naaaxe: Bbbpul TanYwlnear / 1� 1 (ct''',4, ii..,,,,..„,,,,,, �' yj;i phi-' � ��� ,j ____I i 5..4! _.___,-----z------) ,. r J; r c( 4 \ - I t l / )1!, 0:!;IP,,7--.N" , s, —1/)// . ' 1 i, .S \_'-'s,;.t " ;%, - .. .. ill , .::. • LS o------\_ , , _ Id. ,i,i')'''. ,3 -, i'i,,P0. .._7 • ,,,, . ), . i , % 14...... ..,? ,i i1.1- , 1.p. '. - -1 ALII. . c, „:-.,:•:,......:....:•.••:::.::.::::::.•:.::•:.„,„::::::::::•.:.::::::::•:•. ,&.„.. „. . . --; _ .. :, , • , .,,Lif... ..„ .:-. .J.i.0:: ,, , ,`, ,, .. . , / :,::::.:.:: iii .. - _ 0 ,,,. ,, . • l �..:.. , ,-,,__ .': \\C�\` \ 1�I�. III ,i ":\ N � .., ��� � ter \ -� ....:....... ,n)c. - r'‘P,Z4, 0 _ ,,. ., \ \,:, . 1. ,-,, , - , -.-...-.,.,) lk..... •• K: , •'‘ - . - ![-k -.., - k..\" \\/- \ \\, s'',''t . ... ' '-''Z7- 4 ' t) egrEga00 & Associates _ f tl ° i 9 --------\ f 4155 Outer Traffic Circle, Lon Beach, CA 90804 l 1-=,� Phone(582)961-3494 Fax (562)961-3493 \ - `=f / G axemoe Encore Land Partners :;;\ - -. Rocky Hollow Quarry �i- _ Exiatlna Site Condition. i ti ea. . nre M a etet[ e91 MR W. 8430 8430 existing KS 4/28/05 Figure. 3.1 - _ site conditions - CITY OF SAN JACINTO GENERAL PLAN NETWORK S LAMB CYN.RD. \:2 - RAMONA EXPWY \ S�V Cie. 4 , qC/4et. 1 99 .• I. 1 T I Rp '- I I• N I --- — 1 1 It 1 I --. cc ', NI `\ Z O40 1 1 \ 1 ".�• r.:::::♦::�T:tL:::::: 1C 4 ;... i:1:L:: Q(;:•:::•:;}:}:.;;;•::::� • 'COTTONWOOD ♦♦r I AVE. •♦ _t-- I1 , 1 • W 1 • 7TH a I ST. ESPLANADE I AVE. N. > Q j ! a p >- co ce cc 14 p COMM f >- d A LEGEND: FRUITVALE Q EATON AVE.Y r AVE. \ v N ----- -CITY BOUNDARY \\ u., • -■ =LIMITED ACCESS CONVENTIONAL Q r IJ HIGHWAY 1- r MENLO AVE. '^ 1 \� -URBAN ARTERIAL♦ ♦ --/-' ♦ -ARTERIAL O iliel -MAJOR SANDERSON SAN JACINTO -SECONDARY AVE. AVE. - — - -COLLECTOR YALE -ROADWAY OUTSIDE CITY SPHERE ST. 1 A q le) ROCKY HOLLOW QUARRY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, City of San Jacinto,California-02552:04 URBAN ssao,.os RG P September 7, 2005 Mr.Timothy Hults Community Development Director City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, California 92583 Subject: Statement of Qualifications for Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)for the Rocky Hollow Quarry and Related Professional Staff Services Dear Mr. Hults: This proposal is submitted by RGP Planning & Development Services (RGP) in response to a request from the City of San Jacinto for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Rocky Hollow Quarry and related professional staff services. The project consists of formal applications for consideration for a General Plan Amendment, a change of zone to Mineral Overlay Zone, Conditional Use Permit and Reclamation Plan for an accumulation of parcels totaling 220 acres. The applicant's objective is to extract approximately 10 million tons of commercially saleable aggregate over a ten-year time period. Of the 220 acres, approximately 100 acres will be surface mined, 55 acres will be graded and 65 acres will remain undisturbed to serve as a visual buffer during quarry operations. The mined materials will be processed on-site with semi-portable (non- permanent) processing equipment, specifically with a crusher, screens and radial stackers. The application proposes eight mining phases lasting between 3-months and 2 years. Reclamation is proposed as a concurrent and sequential process, occurring from north to south. The subject property is situated in the northwest section of the City of San Jacinto. Generally stated, the proposed project is a conversion of land use from vacant property to the proposed Quail Run master planned community. The primary goal of Encore Land Partners, LLP is to significantly prepare the property for ultimate development (end-use) as the Quail Run community, as well as to provide the local market with base and fill for the local construction market. It is understood by RGP that the City requires a scope and schedule that will allow for an approximate May 2006 completion date. RGP believes this target is practical, assuming an early start date. The enclosed responds to the content requirements of the City's Request for Proposal (RFP). The elements include: 1. Scope of Services: RGP has formulated the following approach to the project based on the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Surface Mining And Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA), review of the Project Application and supporting information filed with the City of San Jacinto Community Development Department(City), Planning & Development Services 8921 Research Drive, Irvine, California 92618, (949) 450-0171, (949) 450-0182 Fax City of San Jacinto SOQ for Environmental Consultation September 7, 2005 - Page 2 our knowledge of the potential environmental issues associated with preparing Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) for Surface Mining projects, and our knowledge and history as former staff planners and Planning Directors for California cities. The scope outlines several objectives and related tasks to guide our approach to preparing the EIR for this project. 2. Professional Staff Services: The experience of RGP's Principals and professional staff is extensive, including experience as former public agency planners, specialists in CEQA and SMARA related projects, and experience as Planning Commissioners in the private lives of certain of RGP's personnel. The firm offers an understanding of the statutes, the process, the agencies with which projects of this nature must be consulted, and the needs of decision-makers. This experience translates to the ability to properly and efficiently serve the City as supplemental Professional Planning Staff. 3. Relevant Experience: RGP and its principals have prepared approximately 80 EIRs and Environmental Assessments in conformance with the State CEQA Statutes and CEQA Guidelines. Additionally, RGP has prepared, processed and successfully defended more than 60 surface mining cases since the firm's inception in 1991. 4. Key Project Staff: Evident from the title of this section, RGP identifies those persons and firms who will be working on the assignment, including any unique talents and skills necessary to resolve issues related to resources analyses. 5. Project Schedule, Assumptions and Cost Summary: RGP has included project spreadsheet to indicate the anticipated costs for environmental analyses/staff contract services. It is evident within the spreadsheet where emphasis is being placed and which of RGP's staff are proposed to be involved at each point of the process. 6. Appendix: The Appendix contains additional information about RGP which may provide the City with a comprehensive understanding of the firm, including an hourly fee schedule, standard billing policies, and associated resumes for the firm's principals, associates and professional staff. This proposal will remain effective for the remainder of the calendar year, in the potential instance where a delay in commencement the project may occur. Please contact me if you should you require any clarifications or require additional information about RGP. We look forward to hearing from you and assisting the city with this project. Respectfully submitted, RGP Planni g&Development Services Richard K.Goacher Chandra K.!trout,AICP President Associate November 3,2005 r)Cricil Mr.Timothy Hults R G I City Manager City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, California 92583 RE: CONTRACT FOR ROCKY HOLLOW QUARRY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Dear Mr. Hults: RGP is pleased to be selected by the applicant and the City to provide professional services for the above referenced project. We look forward to the City Council authorizing RGP to commence its work program and believe all of the City's expectations will be met. The contract will be executed and returned by messenger in the next few days. Upon receipt of the City contract form, we became aware for the first time of the "subrogation" requirement expected of consultants. We requested waiver from this provision, but this request has been rejected by the City Attorney. Our proposal of September 7, 2005 included a fee schedule to indicate how the contract funds would be spent and where emphasis would be placed in the process. We also included a copy of our corporate hourly rate sheet and billing policies. It was evident that RGP was unaware of the requirement for subrogation and that the subrogation cost was not anticipated. Since we do not want to start this project on day one in a financial hole, we request substitution of a higher project fee. The justification is that insurance carriers do not provide subrogation certificates for free. Such a certificate is obviously a higher level of protection than is otherwise intended in a standard business policy. For that protection,they assess RGP a fee equal to three percent (3%) of the face value of the contract. In this instance, we must pay a fee of $3,961 for each party for whom subrogation is extended. On behalf of the firm, we request that you permit RGP to provide a revised fee for this project after conversing with the applicant and the applicant's representative. Again, the issue is that before we ever put eyes to paper or perform any field work, we will have paid a minimum of $3,961 to the insurance company. That places us in the position of having no chance of making our goal profit of 10%for reinvestment back into our own firm. We thank you in advance for this consideration. Regardless of the decision, we stand ready to serve the City and the City's business interests with equal dedication. We remain committed to excellence in all products bearing our name and to serving the City with distinction. Respectfully submitted, RGP Pia"min &Development Services Richard K. Goa er • Founder CC: Chandra K. Krout,AICP, RGP Pam Goacher, Contracts Admin., RGP Planning & Development Services 8921 Research Drive, Irvine, California 92618, (949) 450-0171, (949) 450-0182 Fax rigCOST SUMMARY Environmental Impact Report Preparation and Staff Services ,4 Revised November 2005 RGP SCOPE OF WORK R.Goacher G Goacher J Krout C Krout I Iinllhart P Goacher I Nguyen Total Costs Ilour. Project Initiation/Design Team Coordination 4 4 16 2 2 2 $3,080 30 Assemble Background Info/City Staff Coordination 8 2 11 24 2 $5,305 47 Preparation of IS/NOP 2 4 4 32 16 2 2 $6,090 62 Draft ADEIR Analysis Sections&MMRP 16 8 20 _ 98 32 16 8 $19,930 198 Encore Land Partners,LLP Review of ADEIR/MMRP 8 2 8 16 4 4 2 $4,820 44 City Review of ADEIR/MMRP 4 2 7 24 4 4 $4,545 45 _ Prepare DEIR/MMRP for Public Circulation 8 4 14 34 8 4 4 $7,960 76 Finalize Analysis Sections for FEIR 8 • 4 16 18 16 4 4 $7,390 70 Coordination with State Clearinghouse 2 4 2 8 2 2 $2,140 20 Preparation of Responses to Comments/Revisions to Doc. 6 2 16 36 8 4 4 $7,770 76 _ Finalize Preparation of Findings of Fact 8 2 16 16 2 2 $5,220 46 Finalize Mitigation Monitoring&Reporting Program 8 6 16 28 8 4 2 $7,800 72 Compile Public Hearing FEIR 8 2 16 24 8 8 8 $7,480 74 Prepare NOC 2 2 6 2 2 $1,390 14 Prepare NOD/Post/Payment of Fees 2 2 4 _ 4 2 $1,360 14 Duplication Costs/Miscellanous(Fed Ex,Postage)Costs $6,500 0 Staff Services 30 30 210 20 20 30 $33,250 340 Subtotals, 94 42 154 384 102 64 48 $132,030 888 Subrogation Fee(3%of Total Fee) $3,961 0 Revised Subtotal $135,991 r � RGP Proposal for Environmental Consulting & Professional Staff Services Rocky Hollow Quarry City of San Jacinto, California PREPARED FOR: Mr. Timothy Hults Community Development Director City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto California 92583 PREPARED BY: RGP Planning& Development Services 8921 Research Drive Irvine, California 92618 Rick Goacher, Principal Chandra K. Krout, Associate September 7, 2005 SCOPE OF WORK & PROJECT APPROACH ROCKY HOLLOW QUARRY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT & PROFESSIONAL PLANNING STAFF SERVICES RGP Planning and Development Services (RGP) has formulated the following approach and scope of work based on: 1. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA); 2. Review of the Project Applications and supporting environmental information filed with the City of San Jacinto Community Development Department(City);and, 3. RGP's knowledge of issues typically associated with preparation of EIRs and MNDs for mining and reclamation plans, general plan amendments, zone changes, and entitlement actions. This approach is only preliminary, meaning; RGP anticipates that the scope of work may require minor adjustments to reflect locally preferred methods and styles. 1.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES TECHNICAL APPROACH Maximum Use of Existing Information Reports and studies for the Rocky Hollow Quarry (project) have already been prepared and submitted to the City with the Project Application. RGP reviewed the information and generally found the data to be prepared to professional standards and believes the data will be acceptable for use in the environmental analysis. However, in the short period of time available to review the material, a few questions were raised which will require a re-read and possibly an explanation by the applicant's representative and possibly by the study authors. RGP intends to use and update this information as necessary for an accurate EIR. RGP will review and renew our understanding of this information quickly to enable a timely and cost efficient environmental assessment process. Data Review and Verification The first critical step in the EIR process is verification of the accuracy and adequacy of the existing environmental documents that have been submitted along with the Project Applications. The intent of this review is to conduct an independent"peer review"of the documents on behalf of the Lead Agency(City of San Jacinto) so as to incorporate appropriate existing information into the EIR. As evidenced in the enclosed resumes, RGP includes qualified staff to conduct this review and employ the existing information. RGP Planning&Development Services 1 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Service Project Description, Impact Analysis,and Presentation The EIR must present the description of the project and the impact analyses in a manner that is understandable to the public, interested agencies, and decision makers, so they may provide informed commentary on the project analysis. RGP is committed to preparing an EIR that satisfies community and agency information requirements. Project Management and Schedule RGP believes our firm should function as an extension of the City staff, while permitting access to the process by the project applicant. RGP will strategically engage City staff during the EIR process for direction, decisions, and progress reporting. RGP will manage the day-to-day efforts to comply with the proposed EIR schedule and the most efficient use of staff resources. RGP Approach RGP has responded to the anticipated environmental documentation requirements for the project in the structure of our internal firm.The management and technical personnel share the following characteristics: • Experience in preparing environmental documents for projects throughout the state of California, including specifically Riverside County. • Experience in preparing and managing EIRs for SMARA-related applications. • Experience in working with responsible, interested and effected agencies and community groups. • A commitment to preparing pragmatic environmental documents that meet all state-mandated requirements,as well as the needs of the City of San Jacinto and the applicant. Reference SMARA and State Mining and Geology Board Reclamation Regulations The City environmental review and land use entitlement process for mining projects is intertwined with the requirements of SMARA. Throughout the EIR preparation process and development of any required mitigation measures, RGP will consider the requirements of SMARA and the City of San Jacinto's Surface Mining and Reclamation policies and regulations as articulated in General Plan policies and the City Municipal Code. METHODOLOGY TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION OBJECTIVE Define expectations and develop working relationship between the City,the project applicant and RGP. METHODOLOGY Early in the process, RGP will also conduct a site visit for all members of the EIR team, appropriate City staff members and the project applicant to develop a mutual understanding of the project description, alternatives and potential issues to be addressed in the EIR. RGP Planning&Development Services 2 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services Upon project authorization, RGP will meet with City representatives to initiate the environmental review process. This involves establishing lines of communication (including the project applicant), discussing potential information sources, reviewing and refining the scope of work and schedule, finalizing the project description and alternatives, and the City providing RGP with a distribution list for circulation of the Initial Study/Notice of Preparation(NOP),of which RGP will be responsible for the document production. TASK 2: ASSEMBLE AND REVIEW BACKGROUND INFORMATION OBJECTIVE Maximize the efficient use of existing information and avoid duplication of effort. METHODOLOGY Reports and studies have already been prepared that will be useful in preparing the environmental documentation for the proposed project EIR. RGP will assemble and review existing information, and prepare a complete bibliography of available reports and studies. We will also familiarize ourselves with this information so we can conduct a meaningful scoping process. TASK 3: INITIAL STUDY/NOTICE OF PREPARATION(NOP) OBJECTIVE Prepare a legally solid,thorough and complete Initial Study/ NOP for the proposed project to be distributed by RGP. METHODOLOGY RGP will prepare an Administrative Draft Initial Study / NOP in compliance with CEQA for City review and comment. As required by CEQA,the NOP will include a description of the project, a location map showing the project site, and the probable environmental effects identified in the Initial Study. The Administrative Draft Initial Study/ NOP will include a completed environmental checklist (form either provided by the City or from the CEQA Guidelines) and will include "standards of significance" and written explanations to the checklist questions. RGP will use existing information to the greatest extent possible. RGP proposes to use an "expanded" Initial Study to eliminate non-significant environmental issues from further consideration. By fully addressing some environmental effects in the Initial Study, the EIR will focus on those impacts that could be significant and unavoidable, or for which substantial analysis is required. The resulting Initial Study would be made a part of the EIR by incorporating the document as an appendix. If determined necessary by City staff, RGP recommends one (1) scoping meeting for the purpose of receiving community input during the Initial Study/NOP process. RGP will lead as directed by City staff the scoping meeting. Upon receipt of one (1) set of City comments from all City departments on the Initial Study/ NOP, RGP will revise the documents and forward a final Initial Study/ NOP to the City for public distribution. RGP will file fifteen (15)copies of the Initial Study/ NOP with the State Clearinghouse. On behalf of the City, RGP will also distribute copies to all other applicable agencies and interested parties. The City will provide RGP with the necessary distribution/mailing list for the scoping meeting and Notice of Preparation. RGP Planning&Development Services 3 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services PRODUCTS In summary, RGP will provide: • Three(3) copies of an Administrative Draft Initial Study for review by the City. • Fifteen(15) copies of the Initial Study/Notice of Preparation to the State Clearinghouse. • Evidence of mailing of all required copies to the State Clearinghouse and all applicable agencies. • Attend scoping meeting conducted by City staff. • Issue a report summarizing comments from the scoping meeting. TASK 4: ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR/MMGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM OBJECTIVE Prepare a legally adequate, thorough and complete Administrative Draft EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)for City review, addressing all of the impacts identified as potentially significant in the Initial Study consistent with the CEQA Guidelines and recent case law. METHODOLOGY RGP will use information from the Initial Study/ NOP and scoping process including any comments received from the state,other jurisdictions, and the public to focus the analysis on those issues identified as potentially significant and of general concern. RGP will use and incorporate by reference,to the maximum extent feasible, existing information identified in Task 2. PREPARATION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR The Administrative Draft EIR will focus on key environmental issues and identify why some environmental issues were scoped out by the Initial Study/ Notice of Preparation. As described above, refinements to the specific work program for addressing environmental issue areas will be developed in coordination with City staff. RGP will submit a copy of the Table of Contents for the Administrative Draft EIR prior to final formatting of the document This will permit the City to review the contents and provide input regarding the overall organization and format of the Administrative Draft EIR. RGP will produce an Administrative Draft EIR that includes the following items: a. Executive Summary. The Administrative Draft EIR will include a summary chapter, which will explain the pertinent issues identified and briefly describe the impacts and mitigation measures. The summary will also include a brief description of the alternatives to the proposed project. A summary table will be provided consisting of a matrix of impacts and mitigation measures, including levels of significance of impacts before and after mitigation. b. Project Description. RGP will prepare a general Project Description section for the project. This will be developed in coordination with City staff and the project applicant, and include regional and vicinity location maps, site features, a description of ownership, land holdings and jurisdictional boundaries, project phasing and reclamation, and relationship to other related mining support activities and facilities. RGP Planning&Development Services 4 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services c. Setting. RGP will collect data and prepare setting sections for inclusion in the Administrative Draft EIR. It is anticipated that the setting sections will rely on information from the preparation of technical studies for the project, previous reports prepared by the City, and other published reports, as supplemented by information obtained during site visits and RGP graphics and mapping capabilities. d. Significance Criteria. RGP will draft proposed significance criteria for each EIR topic for review and comment, as part of the preparation of the Administrative Draft EIR. These criteria will be based on Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines and the professional judgment of RGP staff. This will result in consistent and appropriate application of impact thresholds and mitigation requirements for all EIR topic areas. e. Impacts and Mitigation Measures. This section of the Administrative Draft EIR will present an objective evaluation of the impacts of the proposed project based on issues identified by RGP and the City during the Initial Study/NOP process. Emphasis will be placed on identifying the change in physical impacts that would occur as a result of the proposed project. In addition, measures to mitigate adverse impacts will be identified. f. Alternatives. CEQA requires a range of alternatives to be analyzed that meet project objectives, are feasible, and would avoid or substantially lessen at least one (1) significant impact of the project. Typically at least two(2)project alternatives are analyzed not including the "No Project" alternative. RGP has estimated analysis of two alternatives in addition to the "No Project" alternative in the Administrative Draft EIR. These alternatives would be developed as part of the preparation of the Administrative Draft EIR. The Administrative Draft EIR will include a discussion of the environmental impacts associated with each alternative and compare the impacts with those identified for the proposed project. In addition, a summary matrix that presents and contrasts the environmental effects of each alternative as compared to the proposed project will be prepared. g. Statutory Sections. The Administrative Draft EIR will also include all statutory sections required by CEQA, including effects found not to be significant, significant impacts which cannot be avoided, cumulative impacts, growth-inducing impacts, the relationship between local short-term uses of man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity, and significant irreversible environmental changes. h. Bibliography. The Administrative Draft EIR will list all persons and agencies contacted and reference materials used during EIR preparation. i. Mitigation Monitoring Report The draft Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) will include specific mitigation measures, assignments of responsibilities, relationships of project phasing, and timeframes for implementation identified in the impact analysis. j. Technical Appendix. The technical appendix will include calculations developed for the technical or quantified analysis. RGP will meet with City staff early in the EIR process to confirm the standards of significance to be used in the analysis. The resulting standards of significance will be clearly identified in each topical section. The Administrative Draft EIR will include all statutory sections required by CEQA. The statutory sections will include project description, setting, impacts and mitigation measures for the environmental issues, and a complete list of authors responsible for the environmental analysis. The impact analysis developed by RGP will treat impacts at a project-specific level. The methodology and criteria used for determining the impacts of the project will be clearly and explicitly described in the EIR, including any assumptions, models, or modeling techniques used in the analysis. The level of significance of RGP Planning&Development Services 5 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services the impact will be stated and a determination will be made as to whether it is less than significant, potentially significant, significant and avoidable, or significant and unavoidable. The extent to which the proposed mitigation measures will reduce the level of significance of the identified impact will also be explicitly stated. Where significant or potentially significant impacts are identified in the Administrative Draft EIR, appropriate, practicable and project-specific level mitigation measures will be formulated. The impact will be numbered, as will the corresponding mitigation measures. Cross references will be provided where necessary. At the end of the impact chapter,conclusions will be drawn regarding the availability and feasibility of mitigation measures. PRODUCTS RGP will provide five bound copies of the Administrative Draft EIR/MMRP to the City for internal review. ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED The following section discusses the specific environmental issues and proposed tasks for each environmental parameter that may be affected by the project. The following list of environmental issues may be expanded or reduced depending on the results of the Initial Study and public responses received during the scoping meeting and Initial Study/NOP comment period. Land Use/Agriculture/Open Space Low-lying portions of the project Study Area are currently used for open grazing. The EIR will address potential impacts of the project on open grazing uses in the vicinity, potential growth-inducing impacts, and relationship to existing and proposed land use plans and policies of the City of San Jacinto. Tasks • Describe the character of the region and the area surrounding the project site in terms of existing and planned development patterns and land uses. Identify adopted, planned, and proposed development in the vicinity of the project Study Area under the General Plan,zoning and land use policies of the City of San Jacinto.The area immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the project site is currently being graded in preparation for approximately 400 dwelling units in conjunction with an elementary school and community park known as"The Cove"development. Immediately west of the project site is a planned specific plan that has an anticipated submittal date of approximately October 2005. The combination of these approved and planned residential developments will have a role in the land use compatibility evaluation for the subject project. • Describe and map existing land uses and City of San Jacinto General Plan land use and zoning designations in the vicinity of the project site. • Review appropriate City of San Jacinto General Plan policies and goals, development standards, and other applicable plans and programs. Discuss the consistency of the project with the applicable plans and programs,and ordinances. • Using information provided by the City of San Jacinto, identify approved and foreseeable future developments, such as tentative tract maps that, in combination with the project, could result in significant cumulative effects. • Based on applicable laws, policies, and regulations, develop significance criteria to be applied to the impact analysis. Identify any General Plan inconsistencies that may result from implementation of the project. Describe any land use compatibility issues that may arise from implementation of the project, including potential impacts of the project on nearby agricultural operations. RGP Planning&Development Services 6 RockyHollow Quarry p Q ry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services • Identify feasible measures to mitigate identified land use incompatibilities. Transportation/Circulation The subject property does not propose to change the City's General Plan Circulation Element. Traffic will gain access from Warren Road, between Michael Road and Scott Street, approximately 4,000 feet north of Cottonwood Avenue. The access road will travel westerly across the Casa Loma Canal, then wind northerly to the proposed site.The EIR will examine potential impacts associated with the project-generated traffic volumes in the context of increased traffic volumes generated by future development in the area. Tasks Data Collection • Study Initiation. RGP will identify issues and concerns, obtain existing traffic volume data, determine the current status of roadway plans, if any, in the study area, and establish the basis for projected traffic volumes based upon the applicant's traffic impact analysis. • Data Collection. The data collection will include review of the project description and alternatives, the project's traffic impact analysis, and site reconnaissance. Traffic Analysis • Trip Generation/ Distribution. The trip generation and trip distribution for the project will be derived from the information for the proposed operation from the project sponsor (e.g.truck traffic in and out of the rock plant via the scale, and number of employees), and the traffic impact analysis' described traffic counts. • Traffic Analysis. According to the project's traffic impact analysis, traffic impacts were identified in terms of the City of San Jacinto Level of Service "D." The intersection and roadway traffic analyses evaluated daily weekday conditions, and a.m. and p.m. peak-hour conditions at the project site's access drive at the intersection of North Warren Road in the vicinity of the project site. At issue for the short-term project impacts is the projected truck traffic through the cities of San Jacinto, Perris, Hemet and Riverside County at large. • For the Existing plus Ambient plus Project plus Cumulative Traffic Conditions,the following study area intersections are projected to operate at unacceptable levels of service during the peak hours for Warren Road at: Ramona Expressway, Project Driveway, Cottonwood Avenue, and Esplanade Avenue. However,for the Existing plus Ambient plus Project plus Cumulative Traffic Conditions,the same study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service during the peak levels of service with the off-site improvements listed in the traffic impact analysis report. • RGP will review the applicant's traffic impact analysis regarding traffic safety and operational considerations at the site's access in terms of capacity,stacking requirements, and overall site circulation. • Based upon the traffic impacts identified above, mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce or eliminate significant impacts so as to maintain acceptable traffic conditions at study intersection locations and site access. • RGP will review the traffic impact analysis report containing graphic and tabular materials that fully documented the methodologies and results of the study. • Technical materials such as traffic counts and technical calculations will be made available for reviewers, either included in an EIR appendix or on-file at the San Jacinto Community Development Department. RGP Planning&Development Services 7 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services there mining activity is occurring within the proposed project site, sensitive noise receptors in currently limited to agricultural operations. However, there is grading for approximately 400 )ccurring immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the project site. These future Traffic will gain will be a sensitive noise receptor given the close proximity to the project site's currently feet north of 3S. Project noise impacts will include long-term construction noise as the project site is rind northerly to ig-term noise resulting from processing equipment such as the proposed rock crushing and I traffic volumes approximately 260 daily truck trips) entering and exiting the existing the project site during ill be considered to be part of the existing conditions baseline. I Jacinto Noise Ordinance does not quantify noise levels into numeric standards; therefore in a quantitative analysis, the standards for stationary noise were obtained from the County of oral Plan Noise Element. While compliance with the County's Noise Element is expected to determine the oise impact resulting from construction activities, an assessment of appropriate staging areas projected traffic :o assure that construction noise impacts to sensitive receptors is minimized to the extent wise assessment will also address the long-term noise that is expected to occur under existing lternatives, the a conditions. RGP will assess the future compatibility of noise resulting from the proposed sensitive receptors and devise, where necessary, feasible, appropriate noise mitigation ie derived from and out of the peration will be from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., 6 days per week, and 52 weeks a year for approximately ascribed traffic ays per year for the pit and plant operations. Repair, maintenance and trucking will occur 24 i days per week. The noise impacts associated with these operations will be analyzed by the ;e ordinance. stifled in terms ises evaluated !ss drive at the ie evaluating the applicant's blasting impact analysis which evaluated the potential impacts and rt-term project )idelines for conducting the excavation and removal of materials with minimal disturbance to verside County and cultural areas of concern in the vicinity of the project site. Of greatest concern to the of blasting is the vibration it causes. Blast induced ground vibrations are primarily the result of ing study area pressure acting on the rock around the borehole and the explosion gas pressure pushing the )eak hours for away from the bedrock toward the open pit Maximum permissible levels have been established made Avenue. idemic and governmental studies of the effects of vibration on nearby property and people. le same study peak levels of st have a method of estimating ground vibration from a blast during its planning to confidently ration limits. Both short-term and long-term impacts of blasting in close proximity to proposed ielopment will be evaluated by the EIR. d operational to circulation. I to reduce or and discuss existing major noise sources in the vicinity of the project area based on information ;ton locations from the City of San Jacinto General Plan,the County of Riverside's General Plan Noise Element, lies, and other sources. Describe the existing noise environment on the basis of noise rents taken at the project site according to the Rocky Hollow Noise Analysis dated June 21, ials that fully ze local noise regulations and standards, including the Noise Element of the City of San Jacinto for reviewers, Plan and County of Riverside General Plan and ordinances, as they pertain to the proposed )rtment. Development Services 8 Rocky Hollow Quarry :ky Hollow Quarry )05 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services t/Staff Services • Identify the noise-sensitive land uses or activities in the vicinity of the project. • Estimate the time that construction equipment will be in use and the type of noise each makes. Noise impacts of construction will be quantified based on the duration, nature, phasing and level of various activities. • Estimate (as needed)future noise levels for the proposed project and off-site alternative based on traffic estimates and using the Federal Highway Administration Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model and SOUND32. • Evaluate the potential for significant noise impacts based on the modeling results and with reference to the City of San Jacinto noise compatibility standards. • Based on applicable laws, policies, and regulations, develop significance criteria to be applied to the impact analysis. Assess the level of impact based on the identified significance criteria and the noise modeled for the project. • Identify feasible, appropriate noise mitigation measures to avoid or reduce adverse impacts in consultation with the City of San Jacinto. Air Quality The project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin where the pollutants of greatest concern are carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (03) and particulate matter (PMw). Air quality issues associated with the proposed project are expected to consist of long-term construction emissions and long-term vehicle emissions. Emissions are expected to be of two types: 1) fugitive dust and 2) exhaust emissions from construction equipment, materials transport and employee vehicles. The proposed plant will consist of a mobile front-end loader, primary jaw crusher, screens, a series of conveyors and secondary cone crusher.Any impacts resulting from the equipment's short-term and long-term emissions will also be assessed in the EIR. Short-term activities include grading and demolition,construction,working trips and material delivery. Long-term activities include crushing and screening plant operations, worker commuter trips, product delivery trucks and on-site mobile equipment.The EIR will address the significance of these impacts. Tasks • Discuss the regional and local air quality setting as it pertains to the project Summarize the local and regional meteorology, topographic factors affecting pollutant dispersion, and ambient air monitoring data. Discuss current air quality management efforts that may have an effect on the project. Identify sensitive air pollutant receptors in the proposed project vicinity. • Discuss the proposed project's consistency with goals, policies, and standards of City of San Jacinto and the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD). • Estimate particulate matter, total hydrocarbon, and nitrogen oxide emissions from the project using URBEMIS7g, a regional emissions model for mobile sources. Evaluate the potential for toxic air emissions as a result of project development. • Discuss regional emissions that will be generated over the long term due to increased traffic as well as short-term emissions associated with development of the project site. Compare project-generated contributions to regional emissions in order to establish the proposed project's significance in terms of regional air quality impacts. RGP Planning&Development Services 9 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services • Based on applicable laws, policies, and regulations, develop significance criteria to be applied to the impact analysis.Assess the level of impact based on the identified significance criteria and the air quality levels modeled for the project. • Mitigation measures will be developed that will result in air emission levels that will be acceptable to the City of San Jacinto and the Air Quality Management District or it will be clearly stated that it is not possible to do so. Geology and Soils RGP will review soil surveys of the study area. Using published information, RGP also will identify potential unstable soils and geologic materials, if any. RGP will review the earthquake history of the area and discuss its implications with regard to seismic hazards for the proposed project and alternatives. No soils testing or subsurface investigations will be undertaken as part of this effort. According to a geologic fault review conducted by Leighton Consulting, Inc. dated December 10, 2004, the project site is not located within an "Earthquake Fault Zone" as identified by the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazards Act However, there has been identified Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone that may be within one-quarter mile of the project site. Consequently, RGP will examine the seismic study map included and recommend appropriate mitigation measures as necessary. RGP will review the local U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Survey for San Jacinto, and soils testing and subsurface investigations conducted by the applicant's specialists regarding stratigraphy and total depth of the alluvial deposits, permeability of the deposits and existing groundwater levels. RGP will discuss the significance of any such loss. Mitigation measures, if any will be developed by RGP. RGP's investigation will incorporate the findings from the Assessment of Natural Materials at the Rocky Hollow Site for Construction Materials Suitability and the Geologic Fault Review for the project site. Hydrology, Groundwater, Flooding,and Water Quality The EIR will address existing conditions and the potential for flooding of the project site, increased runoff (including water quality and quality) from the project, impacts to groundwater and relationships with existing and proposed habitats, as well as any necessary mitigation. There are currently no water wells on-site and none are proposed with this application. Water for dust suppression will be supplied with municipal water and/or water arranged by the agency that manages the Case Loma Canal. The project site is three miles from the nearest surface water feature, the San Jacinto River. By project design, all surface runoff during excavation will be directed to three detention basins to be constructed on-site. The capacity of these basins is to be designed to state standards taking into consideration watershed size, vegetation type, rainfall and terrain. Furthermore, there are no proposed stream diversions caused by the project. The groundwater is estimated to be at approximately 150 feet below the lowest quarry floor elevation. According to the applicant's hydraulics and hydrology report, the groundwater will not be intersected or affected. Regardless,the EIR will address the significance of potential impacts to the groundwater. Tasks • Consult with the City of San Jacinto to update information on existing and planned drainage facilities, drainage studies, and adopted plans or policies affecting flows and water quality in the area of the proposed project. RGP Planning&Development Services 10 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services J • Describe and map the surface drainage pattern of the site, adjoining areas and receiving waters based on available aerial photographs, field observation, and available project studies such as the Hydraulics and Hydrology Report for Rocky Hollow Quarry Project, Revised July 2005 for the project site. • Based on available information, describe any existing groundwater resources in the project vicinity, including the location and characteristics of aquifers, water levels,flow directions, and historical trends in groundwater use and conditions. • Based on available information, describe groundwater quality, including a discussion of potential contamination related to historic farming activities,wastewater, and other sources in the area. • Describe the existing regulatory setting including surface water quality regulations that are applicable to the proposed project • Identify net impacts of the project on the surface drainage network including changes in channel conditions and the drainage channel's ability to pass necessary flows. The adjacent Casa Loma Canal land use compatibility will be analyzed as a part of this effort. • According to the Application, the project site does not fall in or within one-quarter mile of an "A" or "X" shaded flood zone. Consequently,there are no known flood hazards on the site or in the immediate project area. However, an analysis will be done to identify proposed flood protection/prevention measures of the project(if needed), and determine residual effects on localized or downstream flooding. • Using existing information, identify the general types and sources of water quality changes that may result from project development Evaluate potential impacts of runoff from the project site on the quality of receiving waters. • Discuss the need to apply for a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for construction activities such as the proposed dust control via a water truck. Identify guidelines and policies of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB),the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), and any local agencies regarding water quality impacts from storm water runoff. • Based on applicable laws, policies, and regulations, develop significance criteria to be applied to the impact analysis. Assess the level of impact based on the identified significance criteria. • Feasible mitigation measures will be designed at a project specific level. The resulting level of significance will be clearly identified prior to, and following,application of mitigation measures Biological Resources The proposed project will occur in areas that are primarily characterized as non-native grasslands, Riverside sage scrub and coastal sage habitats. Natural habitat also exists along roadside drainage ditches and waterways on-site and in the vicinity of the project Based on studies prepared by the applicant's consultant, RGP will examine the project's biological technical report and jurisdictional delineation report regarding how various habitat types and sensitive species may be impacted by the project. Based upon the applicant's biological resource study, the project site supports nine vegetation communities. No threatened or endangered plant species were observed on-site. Two sensitive plant species, Parry's Spineflower and California Black Walnut, were observed during the 2004 protocol coastal California gnatcatcher survey. No threatened or endangered animal species were observed or detected on-site. Six California Species of Special Concern were observed or detected on-site. In addition, this area is known to include the foraging habitat for the Granite Spiny Lizard, Turkey Vulture, Bobcat, Coyote and Mountain Lion according to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Information RGP Planning&Development Services 11 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services derived from the California Department of Fish & Game (CDF&G), the MSHCP and the project's Habitat Adjustment Negotiated Solution (HANS) will be addressed in the EIR, including appropriate mitigation measures(if applicable). The site currently has minimal vegetation. Prior to the start of each phase, the vegetation will be cleared by a combination of dozers and scrapers. The on-site vegetation will be mulched and left on-site for use in the ultimate revegetation of the permanent slopes or removed to be used off-site. The project site requires two types of revegetation. The first is to revegetate permanent slopes developed during quarry operations with a native palette.The second is to temporarily revegetate the quarry floor for dust control and erosion purposes. Tasks • RGP will list and discuss the California Species of Special Concern that could be affected by project implementation. Also obtain any additional information on communities of concern and related permit requirements through agency consultation. • According to the applicant's jurisdictional delineation report, the state's jurisdictional habitats total approximately 0.43 acre and consist of southern sycamore riparian woodland. The amount of mitigation for impacts to CDF&G jurisdictional areas is anticipated to be 3:1 for southern sycamore riparian woodland. The jurisdictional areas will be avoided and preserved on-site and a Streambed / Lake Alteration Agreement will not be necessary. RGP understands that an individual or nationwide permit will not be necessary from the USA COE based on the previously prepared wetlands delineation plan and avoidance of the designated wetlands. • Describe the natural plant communities on the project site. Note which, if any, communities are of special concern because of their rarity, sensitivity, importance as wildlife habitat, or potential to support special- status species. According to the Application, impacts to the following sensitive vegetation communities would be considered significant: Riverside Sage Scrub, Coastal Sage Scrub (Chaparral Ecotone) and non- native grassland. • Summarize federal, state, and local policies and regulations as they pertain to biological resources in the proposed project area. A discussion of the role of appropriate agencies, such as USFWS and the CDF&G will also be included. The section will discuss the significance of any direct habitat destruction, disturbance, or hydrological changes that may occur as a result of the proposed project, as well as the specific amount of any habitat removal. • RGP will identify and update other issues, which must be resolved prior to obtaining permits. Based on applicable laws, policies,and regulations, RGP will develop significance criteria to be applied to the impact analysis. • Identify mitigation measures to minimize or eliminate each significant impact, noting where authority and responsibility for carrying out these measures resides. Cultural Resources RGP will review the cultural resources survey prepared for the project applicant and evaluate potential impacts to historic and archaeological resources. Three bedrock milling features were found within the proposed project boundaries, all of which are comprised of ephemeral slicks. The overall sensitivity of the site with regard to potential cultural resources will be summarized and assessed. Recommendations for further evaluations(if any)will be identified in the EIR. RGP Planning&Development Services 12 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services Visual Resources RGP will summarize all City and Caltrans policies on visual resource management in the study area, including potential scenic highway designations. Any policies related to visual resource management in regard to North Warren Road and Ramona Expressway also will be described. RGP will analyze the applicant's biological technical report,which includes view simulations and related impact analysis on visual resources related to the existing topography. RGP will also examine the visual effects of the proposal from more distant locations, such as certain points in the City of Hemet. Hazards/ Human Health RGP will review the applicant's Phase I Environmental Report in conjunction with the cultural resources survey to analyze the project's potential hazards. Appropriate recommendations and mitigation measures will be summarized and included in the EIR. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The cumulative impact assessment will be conducted pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15130. The cumulative impacts assessment will address each topic covered in the environmental analysis, and shall identify appropriate mitigation measures which may be employed by the project applicant and/or government agencies to lessen adverse environmental effects. The cumulative impact analysis shall be presented within each topical analysis(e.g.traffic)and will be summarized in a separate chapter of the EIR. MANDATORY CEQA SECTIONS Growth-Inducing Effects RGP will evaluate the potential growth-inducing effects of the project. As identified in Section 15126(g)of the CEQA Guidelines, growth in an area is not assumed to be beneficial, detrimental, or of little significance to the environment. The Growth-Inducement section will discuss the project's potential to foster economic or population growth, result in the construction of additional housing or commercial development(either directly or indirectly),or remove obstacles to growth. Effects Found Not to be Significant As required by CEQA Guidelines, a brief discussion will be provided in this section identifying issues that were not considered significant and,therefore,were not discussed in detail in the EIR. Significant Effects That Cannot be Avoided Based on the conclusions regarding significant impacts discussed under each EIR section, a summary of significant effects that cannot be avoided will be provided. Impact Summary A summary of the project's impacts and mitigation measures, for each impact category individually and cumulatively, will be prepared once the impact analyses have been completed for each topic. These factors will be reflected in a matrix format. The matrix will present the potential impact, its significance, recommended mitigation measures,and the significance of the impact after mitigation. RGP Planning&Development Services 13 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services Project Alternatives Project alternatives are designed to reduce the environmental impacts of the proposed project, while at the same time attaining the project objectives (to the extent feasible). It is expected that the detailed project description and project alternatives will be identified during Task 1: Project Initiation, described in this proposal. In addition, comments received on the NOP may also result in the identification of a feasible alternative to the proposed project. RGP will assist the City in identifying feasible alternatives to be analyzed during the EIR process. The alternatives will be described qualitatively and quantitatively, and contrasted with the proposed action in terms of the extent to which they can achieve project objectives or reduce adverse impacts. The alternatives analysis will be presented in a separate chapter of the EIR and will conform to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6. At this time, it is anticipated that the following alternatives to be included in the EIR: • No Project Alternative • Different Intensity of Development(or"habitat preservation" alternative) TASK 5: PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIR AND PUBLIC CIRCULATION OBJECTIVE Prepare a legally adequate, thorough and complete Draft EIR for public review and comment that incorporates and addresses all comments received on the Administrative Draft EIR. METHODOLOGY RGP will incorporate modifications to the Administrative Draft EIR based on the specific comments received from the City and the project applicant. RGP will prepare a Screencheck Draft EIR to allow one final limited review by the City prior to the publication of the Draft EIR. RGP will prepare a detailed analysis of all categories deemed significant or potentially significant in the Initial Study. Exhibits and graphics will be used to describe, evaluate, and analyze information within the document A technical appendix may be required. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be included. RGP will prepare a Notice of Completion send 11 copies of the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse and all applicable agencies for review and comment. A study session or a public hearing conducted by City staff will be attended by RGP. Comments from the study session or Public Hearing will be included in the Draft Final EIR. RGP will provide the following: PRODUCTS • Three (3) copies of a screencheck Draft EIR for review by the City. • Twenty(20) copies of the Draft EIR, in addition to the 15 copies sent to the State Clearinghouse and applicable agencies, plus one reproducible copy. • Evidence of mailing of all required copies of the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse and all applicable agencies. • Study session or public hearing conducted by City staff. RGP Planning&Development Services 14 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services • To the extent that eletronic media is permitted as a substitute for paper copies, RGP will provide the document in PDF format CDs. TASK 6: ADMINISTRATIVE FINAL AND FINAL EIR / MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) OBJECTIVE Prepare a legally adequate, thorough and complete Administrative Final EIR and MMRP consistent with the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15132 and 15097. METHODOLOGY After the close of the public review and comment period, RGP will prepare an Administrative Final EIR, which will be comprised of the Draft EIR, comments on the Draft EfR, and responses to all comments on the Draft EIR. RGP will also include a final MMRP in the Final EIR. The final MMRP will include specific mitigation measures, assignments of responsibilities, relationships of project phasing and time frames for implementation identified in the impact analysis, identification of individuals responsible for sign-off on each measure, and a chart that can be quickly perused to ascertain the status of all measures. RGP does not anticipate that comments received will raise new issues not addressed in the Draft EIR,or that a new survey, additional modeling, or new technical studies will be required to complete adequate responses. Should this not be the case, RGP will initiate discussion immediately with the City staff representatives to receive direction about conducting this extra work. RGP expects that the City will review the Final EIR prior to circulation. Upon receipt of the City staff comments, RGP will revise the Final EIR and submit the revised document to the City for distribution at least 15 days prior to the EIR Certification Hearings. Copies of the Final EIR will be distributed to commenting agencies at least 10 days prior to the EIR Certification Hearings. PRODUCTS RGP will provide ten(10)copies of the Administrative Final EIR to the City for internal review. TASK 7: FINAL EIR, FINDINGS OF FACT,AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS OBJECTIVE Prepare legally adequate, thorough and complete Final EIR that incorporates and addresses all comments on the Draft EIR. Also prepare draft Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093 prior to the final hearings on the Final EIR. Prepare a legally adequate,thorough and complete Final EIR. METHODOLOGY RGP will respond to all comments on the Draft EIR. These comments, along with responses, shall be included in the Final EIR. If requested by the City, a study session will be attended by RGP with the Planning Commission for presentation and review of the Final EIR. RGP Planning&Development Services 15 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services Pursuant to Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines (and in consultation with the City's legal counsel), RGP will draft the Findings of Fact for the proposed project if deemed necessary through the preparation of the EIR. For each significant effect identified in the EIR,the Findings will identify: • Measures incorporated into the project that will avoid or substantially diminish the effect; • A statement that the City lacks jurisdiction to make the changes, but that another agency does have the authority;or • Legal, economic, social, technological or other considerations that make the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible. A Statement of Overriding Considerations will be prepared if the Final EIR identifies significant, unavoidable impacts for the selected project that the City determines would be acceptable in light of the overall benefits of the project. RGP will use a Findings and Overrides format approved by the City and will submit the draft prior to the final hearings on the Final EIR. RGP will send Notice of Completion to all applicable agencies. RGP will provide the following: PRODUCTS • Two (2) copies of the Draft Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations to be reviewed by the City. • Five(5) screencheck copies of the comments and responses to be reviewed by the City. • Ten(10)copies of the Draft Final EIR for the Planning Commission approval. • Ten(10)copies for the Facts and Findings and Statement of Overriding Consideration for the Planning Commission. • Twenty-five (25) copies of the approved Final EIR including appendices, exhibits, and responses to comments,plus one reproducible copy. • Five(5)copies of the Draft Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program(MMRP)for City review. • Twenty-five(25) copies of the Final Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program(MMRP). • Mailing (including evidence thereof) of the Notice of Completion to the State Clearinghouse and copies of Final EIR to commenting agencies. • Study session and public hearing of the Planning Commission. TASK 8: ATTENDANCE AT PUBLIC MEETINGS RGP will attend one Public Hearing or Study Session during the public review period for the EIR, and one Planning Commission public hearing to approve the project and certify the Final EIR. An additional meeting of the Planning Commission or City Council will also be attended by RGP at the direction of City staff. At a minimum, these meetings will be attended by the RGP Project Manager, Chandra Krout. Other members of RGP will attend these meetings as needed to provide appropriate technical expertise. RGP Planning&Development Services 16 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services 1.2 PROFESSIONAL STAFF SERVICE RGP will serve as contract staff to the City Community Development Department for the review and processing of the project application. RGP will meet with the City at least twice per month during the course of the EIR process in addition to weekly reports as accountability check. RGP will review the project application and Reclamation Plan for consistency with the requirements of SMARA, City policies, regulations and ordinances. RGP will be responsible for coordinating the Department of Conservation review of the project application, and with appropriate representatives of the Department of Fish &Game and U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service. RGP will also facilitate the Planning Commission hearings on the EIR and project application, as well as prepare the necessary draft staff reports for review by the Planning Commission and City Council. RGP believes our firm should function as an extension of the City staff, while permitting access to the process by the project applicant. RGP will strategically engage City staff during the CEQA document development for direction, decisions, and progress reporting. RGP will manage the day-to-day efforts of RGP to comply with the proposed CEQA document schedule and the most efficient use of staff resources(dependent on the complexity of the project application). Overall project management and the preparation of all final work products will be the responsibility of RGP.The project manager will be solely responsible for ensuring that the completed products meet all requirements set forth by the City of San Jacinto CEQA and other state and federal laws. RGP staff members will be involved in all phases of the work program and will provide assistance and project management to our subconsultants, thereby maintaining seamless, uniform oversight. RGP will specifically perform the followingtasks: P Y • Coordination with City staff and Department heads pertaining to the technical applications such as the General Plan Amendment,Zone Change, and related documentation. • Prepare an analytical policy study to analyze the applications against all General Plan elements for internal consistency. • Analyze the Zone Change to ensure the request represents the best tool for General Plan implementation. • Coordinate as staff with the State Mining and Geology Board Executive Director. • Coordinate with the Office of Planning and Research and various applicable state agencies. • Seek project understanding and commentary with the cities of Hemet, Perris, and Riverside County. • Preparation of project update memorandum for Department Heads, Planning Commission and City Council. • Preparation of required notices, distribution and follow-up. RGP Planning&Development Services 17 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services • Staff reports and applicant/owner consultation. In addition to RGP's professional staff, our team also includes an in-house certified noise acoustician, a GIS technician and a technical editor. We involve senior level staff in all aspects of the project to assure that high quality work product is maintained. We can supplement the talents of our team with additional technical expertise as necessary for individual projects. Experienced staff resumes are included in the Appendix. RGP's project manager for all environmental services for the City will be Chandra Krout, AICP. Ms. Krout manages a wide range of environmental and planning projects. She serves as a contact person for clients and agencies, writes and edits environmental and planning documents, conducts research and analysis and reviews technical documents. Ms. Krout also is involved with public agency coordination, participates in project meetings and assists in preparation for public hearings. RGP is intentionally composed of experts in key environmental fields to provide the technical credibility necessary to successfully produce and/or review all technical reports and finalize/process the environmental document Professional-caliber technical analyses are essential to assure that the environmental document is deemed credible, objective, and technically precise in the eyes of the lead agency and the public. Of equal importance to the technical ability of all team members, every project participant has typically worked on complex and controversial projects, and therefore, is willing and able to provide the commitment necessary to produce the highest quality work product. Key strengths typically associated with RGP include: • Technical expertise in all of the issue areas that may need to be addressed with the ability to identify project/cumulative impacts in light of CEQA requirements and thresholds of significance, and development of enforceable mitigation measures; • Ability to assign key management and senior staff immediately upon contract award, and to meet the client's schedule requirements. TECHNICAL SUPPORT RGP staff has the ability to prepare environmental documents in either Word or WordPerfect format. Our experienced personnel have the ability to graphically illustrate physical, cultural, demographic and topographic data in map or sketch formats in a variety of computer graphics programs including ArcGIS 9.0 and AutoCAD. RGP also has experienced GIS personnel who map and analyze natural resource data and community planning systems. Furthermore, RGP has the in-house capacity to create any necessary GIS shapefiles as required for the RCA Joint Power Review project submittal requirements. OFFICE LOCATION RGP has a staff of professional planners and analysts in our Irvine office in Orange County, plus an experienced support staff. Environmental planners will be available to respond quickly to environmental requests from the City of San Jacinto. Our highly technical capabilities allow us to be entirely mobile and able to maintain constant communication with all project players, including City staff, subconsultants, applicants, and other RGP staff. RGP is experienced in providing as-needed environmental consulting services and have well developed scheduling systems that allow us flexibility in assigning staff to particular work efforts based on need,as well as maintaining timely response and turn-around times for the City. RGP Planning&Development Services 18 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services 1.3 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE RGP and its principals have prepared approximately eighty (80) EIRs and Environmental Assessments in conformance with the State CEQA Statutes and CEQA Guidelines, and lead agency implementing resolutions. In addition to these CEQA documents, RGP has prepared approximately sixty (60) Surface Mining and Reclamation Act(SMARA)documents. An abbreviated list of CEQA documents prepared by RGP personnel are the following: AGENCY CEQA REPRESENTATION In the past ten years, RGP has been the CEQA consultant to the Irvine Ranch Water District and the Serrano Water District, both in Orange County, California. Additionally, RGP has been the environmental consultant providing service for the City of Westminster, California. This work was performed for and under Mr. Brian Fisk, City Planning Director. Additionally, RPG has performed staff services related to CEQA processing for Bruce Jensen of Alameda County. Service to these clients included project evaluation, initial study preparation, and execution of Exemptions, NDs, MNDs,and EIRs as appropriate to each case. Initial Study and Proposal to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Amendment SMP-16 Reclamation Plan,Alameda County,California RGP was retained to assist in the preparation of a comprehensive Initial Study and related Mitigated Negative Declaration for Amended Reclamation Plan located in Alameda County. The project site encompasses approximately 359.11 ± acres and is part of a larger collection of parcels in the immediate vicinity totaling 1,059 ± acres devoted to aggregate mining and processing since the 195O's. The Amendment to SMP-16 Reclamation Plan would be implemented in approximately 2030 upon completion of the surface mining operations vested under Alameda County Quarry Permits Q-4 and Q-4O granted in 1957 and 1963 respectively. Since the SMP-16 mining operation is vested, the mining aspects of the site are not subject to review in this Initial Study. Only the adoption and implementation of the Amendment to SMP-16 Reclamation Plan itself was subject to review in this study. The Amendment to SMP-16 Reclamation Plan is to be made consistent with current requirements of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act, the California Code of Regulations, Alameda County's General Plan, the Alameda County Surface Mining Ordinance, the Alameda County Specific Plan for the Livermore-Amador Valley Quarry Area Reclamation (1981) ,Alameda County's East County Area Plan (revised 2000). Corona Quarry EIR& MMRP RGP prepared an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)and Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP)for a mining and reclamation plan for a new 680-acre hard rock mine in Riverside County.The permit was to allow for the extraction, crushing, processing, and distribution of over 35 million tons of rock over a 20-year period. Additionally, the permit application included creation of a processing center that included asphalt production and a ready-mix concrete facility. The issues of significance included biology(Stephens kangaroo rat)view shed degradation,dust pollution (PM- 10) and offsite transport of fine material, offsite disturbance from blasting to fracture rock formations, wetlands impacts to Temescal Creek, and truck traffic effects on local arterials. This highly complex project with many tiers of involvement from various agencies required dynamic solutions. RGP successfully took on this responsibility and developed innovative but practical mitigation measures and project modifications that RGP Planning&Development Services 19 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services reduced many of the significant impacts to a level considered less than significant. However, some findings of overriding considerations were nevertheless required. RGP drafted these overriding considerations, which were subsequently adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. As required by CEQA, RGP also developed a mitigation-monitoring program. This monitoring program is still in use today. Following approval of the project by the County and certification of the EIR, RGP constructed a pre-annexation agreement to allow the site to be annexed to the City of Corona, California. Merced River Aggregates Sand &Gravel Mining Environmental Impact Report RGP participated in the program leading to completion of an Environmental Impact Report for a mining and reclamation plan for a 635-acre gravel mine in Merced County. The Surface Mining and Reclamation Plan was prepared by RGP for Calaveras Materials Inc. to support an application to Merced County for a conditional use permit.The project involved the expansion and continued extraction and processing of aggregate from an open gravel pit and processing plant adjacent to State Highway 59 and the Merced River near the town of Hopeton. RGP, in collaboration with the Merced County staff and the applicant's consultants, helped refine the project design to reduce the overall impact of the project prior to initiating community-scoping meetings and preparing the EIR. The project proposed extraction of 9.7 million cubic yards of material in 14 phases over a 35-year period. In this instance, RGP prepared an entitlement strategy that extended into and completely guided the environmental analyses and documentation. RGP recognized the political and environmental difficulties of the permitting assignment and the pitfalls that could affect the CEQA document. For that reason, RGP prepared technical service RFPs and retained the technical consultants. Those technical studies were then peer- reviewed by two other technical consultants so that the determinations were triangulated. From this analysis, RGP prepared a "Background Draft EIR." The background draft EIR, all technical reports, and all peer reviews were provided to the County staff. The County reviewed and approved the work products and authorized their consultants to convert the background EIR into a formal Draft EIR,thus saving time and creating certainty. Key issues addressed in the document included the use of abundant dredge tailings in the surrounding area as an alternative to on-site materials, hydrologic and water quality consequences of the project, and the effectiveness of the reclamation plan in enhancing on-site habitat values. RGP generated photo simulations using advanced computer techniques to determine visual impacts on a scenic highway. RGP also identified potential structural impacts to county roads from heavy volumes of truck traffic, and operational impacts (i.e., noise, air quality, and traffic) on surrounding sensitive uses, including an elementary school and a cemetery. Finally, RGP provided assistance to staff in their preparation of Planning Commission staff reports and findings, as well as successfully providing expert testimony on behalf of the County on subsequent legal challenges. Chile Bar Slate Mine Amended Reclamation Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration Using the same techniques as noted above, RGP was able to provide an amended reclamation plan for a 40- acre slate mining operation situated on the south bank of the South Fork American River in El Dorado County, California. The Chile Bar Slate mine is the oldest and longest continuously operating mine in the State of California, having been in operation since 1886. The Chile Bar Slate Mine was one of the mines in El Dorado County, California, identified as having an outdated reclamation plan. Disputes over the County's administration of Surface Mining and Reclamation Act(SMARA) led to the State Mining& Reclamation Board removing the County's authority and inserting itself as the lead agency for implementing the SMARA. RGP Planning&Development Services 20 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services RGP prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration to address the potentially significant issues of re-foresting, truck traffic on narrow mountainous forest highways, drainage into the American River, visual effects of mining at the edge of the forest adjacent to an active river-recreation camp, and geologic instability. With mitigation applied, all impacts were reduced to less than significant. The MND and MMRP were successfully completed and certified by the State Mining&Reclamation Board. In this instance, RGP negotiated a process with Dr. Parrish, Executive Director, Surface Mining and Geology Board (SMGB), which allowed RGP to provide peer-reviewed data and reports, and to provide a "Background MND"for use by the State's consultant.The process worked to the client's advantage as anticipated. Wilson Creek Surface Mining& Reclamation Plan Environmental Impact Report RGP was retained to prepare an Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program for a proposed in-stream surface mining permit and reclamation plan for a 220-acre portion of Wilson Creek in Riverside County, California. The project description called for a 20-year permit to allow for mining of stream aggregate (sand). The plan also provided for a diversion channel to be constructed to divert normal flows around the mining site, with soft plugs to allow for blowout of the channel walls during periods of high stream velocities. At issue in the EIR preparation process was the presence of Stephens kangaroo rat habitat (live trappings), habitat for the California gnatcatcher, least Bell's vireo,the Southwestern willow flycatcher, and the Arroyo toad, all sensitive and/or endangered species. Habitat values were deemed high and replacement ratios were of critical importance to successful mitigation of impacts. The project was locally controversial, making preparation of the EIR and MMRP difficult. However, the EIR was ultimately certified by the Board of Supervisors,with appropriate findings. RGP prepared an Environmental Impact Report for a 480-acre site within the Mescal Creek fringe area, situated in the high-desert area of Los Angeles County. The site is south of SR-138(Pearblossom Highway),an east-west oriented State highway connecting San Bernardino to Palmdale.The issues of concern, which led to the requirement for an EIR included impacts to a yucca forest, hydrologic impacts to an active streambed in an intermittent yet high-velocity drainage, biological impacts to sensitive species and habitats, and significant impacts to traffic volumes, capacities, speeds and safety on the two-lane state highway. The EIR was successfully completed, but not certified due to the Los Angeles County Planning Commission finding that the project was not compatible with the policies and goals for the region.As permitted for discretionary actions,the Commission dismissed the project without action on the EIR. Tres Cerritos West Specific Plan Amendment and Associated Environmental Management, City of Hemet RGP was retained to assist in the amendment of an existing Specific Plan within the City of Hemet, Riverside County. The project encompassed the subdivision of 121.3 acres into 177 lots for the future development single family residences. The Specific Plan Amendment and Development Agreement allowed for a maximum of 178 units. In addition, a 1.6 acre meandering paseo system and will be provided along the interior streets and greenbelts leading to the park site. A 3.5 acre vernal pool conservation area was proposed to be established in the Southwest corner of the site. The large portion of the site (59.1 acres)will be permanently maintained as hillside area in the Tres Cerritos hills. The MSHCP designated a portion of the western Hemet area as vernal pool conservation area.A portion of the associated Vernal Pool Criteria Area is located approximately 0.75 miles south and southwest of the project area. The Plan required evaluation of potential "edge effects" to the Criteria Area resulting from development RGP Planning&Development Services 21 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services outside of the Criteria Area but within the Area's identified watershed. The site has been subject of various biological studies dating back to 1989. The prior studies included both general and focused species surveys. RGP worked with the client to ascertain approvals for entitlement by assisting in the application for state and federal permits, agreements or pre-discharge notifications. RGP participated in the discussions related to the conditions for the habitat creation and restoration activities to occur within much of the 3.5-acre vernal pool conservation area with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Pacificana New Town Specific Plan, Program EIR&MMRP; Kern County,California RGP was retained to create a new town plan for a base population of 50,000 persons in a 6,000-acre(10.4 sq. mi)site along Interstate 5 at the intersection of Taft Highway within Kern County. The owner, an international consortium of development and financial interests, required a community plan with a complete infrastructure system, social needs such as schools, libraries, cultural facilities, and government facilities. An infrastructure implementation and finance plan was also a part of the requirement The residential component provided for a range of dwelling types and densities.The plan also featured a commercial core and industrial/office areas to assist with creation of a jobs-housing balance. The assignment also required the creation of a Program EIR to the requirements of Kern County, California. This document provided for program-level analysis of the impacts, and found that nearly all categories of impact analysis were significant. Performance standards to be achieved in later levels of discretionary action were identified in the Program EIR to assist in reducing the impacts. RGP prepared all of the scoping materials and prepared all of the agency resolutions and ordinances, findings overriding considerations, and provided testimony at the public hearings. ADDITIONAL CEQA EXPERIENCE • Imperial Center Hotel and Golf Resort EIR; Brea,California • Top of the World Residential Community and Community Park EIR; Laguna Beach,California • Cranberry Bay Planned Community EIR; Brea,California • StoneRidge/Rancon Planned Community Specific Plan EIR; Perris, California ■ Rio Vista Planned Community Specific Plan EIR; Riverside County, California • River Park Planned Community Specific Plan EIR; Perris, California • Hidden Hills Planned Community Area Plan EIR; Laguna Niguel,California ■ Capistrano Commerce Center EIR;San Juan Capistrano,California • May Ranch Planned Community Specific Plan; Perris,California ■ Alpha Beta Industrial Properties Development Plan EIR; Brea, California ■ Preissman Ranch Planned Community Specific Plan EIR; Riverside County,California • Northwest Circulation Study Land Use Plan EIR;San Juan Capistrano,California ■ A-1 Aggregates Surface Mining and Reclamation Plan EIR; Riverside County,California ■ Capistrano Pointe Planned Community EIR;San Juan Capistrano,California ■ Cove Development Office Park EIR; Brea,California ■ Southern California National Bank Headquarters Facility EIR; Brea,California ■ Barstow Quarry Mining and Reclamation Plan Program EIR;San Bernardino County,California ■ Pacific Summit Planned Community Specific Plan EIR;Colton,California • Lakeview Specific Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration; Lake Elsinore, California ■ Rivers Edge Specific Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration; Bakersfield,California ■ Merced Aggregates SMP/RP EIR; Merced,California ■ El Toro Materials Amended Reclamation Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration; Lake Forest, CA ■ Industrial Asphalt Permit Renewal Mitigated Negative Declaration; Lake Forest,California ■ Standard Concrete Permit Renewal Mitigated Negative Declaration; Lake Forest, California ■ IRWD Reservoir Restoration and Maintenance Program MND;Orange County, California ■ Country Club Specific Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration; Bakersfield, California RGP Planning&Development Services 22 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services KEY PROJECT STAFF RGP is staffed by creative and experienced professionals, highly focused for the successful completion of our clients' projects. RGP is committed to quality in our approach,thought processes,and the products developed. The key members of the RGP project staff include the following: GEOFF GOACHER Mr. Goacher, a co-founder of RGP, has been both a professional planner and acoustician for more than 15 years. He is also a co-founder of RGP and has been with the firm ever since its formation in 1991. His services at RGP primarily focus on environmental planning and design, environmental impact analysis, environmental restoration, and impact reporting. He has significant experience in project management, plan development and documentation, environmental resource management, impact analysis, environmental sciences, and regulatory compliance. One of Geoffs main technical and scientific skills is in the area of acoustics and noise control, a field in which he has conducted and published significant research efforts. F. Alton Everest, a world-renowned scientist and author of over 20 technical books, recently solicited Geoff s help in writing a chapter on computer-based sound measurements for his newest book, "The Master Handbook of Acoustics, Fourth Edition." Following completion of this book, Mr. Goacher was then appointed to serve as a technical editor for other of McGraw-Hill's publications. The Master Handbook of Acoustics is McGraw-Hill's top selling textbook on sound and acoustics, a ranking it has held for nearly twenty years. Geoff has also published over a dozen magazine articles since 1996. Mr. Goacher holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Geography and a Master of Science degree in Environmental Studies from California State University, Fullerton. He is certified by the Institute of Noise Control Engineering as an "INCE," and is also a member of the American Planning Association (APA) and the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP). Mr. Goacher has served as a frequent guest lecturer on environmental planning issues at California State University, Fullerton. RICK GOACHER Mr. Goacher, a co-founder of RGP, specializes in policy planning and the management of environmental, regulatory and entitlement projects. His methods are the result of over three and a half decades of urban planning and program management,eleven years as Chairman of Planning Commissions for both the County of Orange and the City of Lake Forest, and graduate-level education in public policy, environmental policy, land use policy and organizational management. Rick has planned both new towns and the revitalization of older neighborhoods. His particular preference is for communities and designs that embrace the tenets of New Urbanism and neo-traditional planning, wherein importance is placed on the livability and sustainability aspects of the development. Rick Goacher is best known for being a programmatic and macro-level thinker. He has the ability to craft successful project-specific methods to navigate through the complex regulatory and entitlement processes of California and the federal government. This talent is the outgrowth of years of experience and an expert knowledge of the California codes, regulations and guidelines, coupled with legal training from Western State University of Law.This knowledge gives a sense of precision to environmental and entitlement processing and allows the folding of multiple steps into a single comprehensive action. RGP Planning&Development Services 23 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services The experience referred to above includes Mr. Goacher's former position as Corporate Director of Planning for the urban design firm, POD (Process Oriented Design), with major "place making" design assignments in Arizona, Texas, Colorado, and throughout California from the firm's headquarters and regional offices in Santa Ana, Los Angeles and San Francisco. He was also formerly the Director of Local Entitlements for Town Group, a Newport Beach based planning and development firm creating master plans for complex properties in Southern California, namely "North Peak" in the Temescal Canyon region and "Liberty" in the Corona-to- Murrieta 1-15 market corridor. The Liberty plan was awarded the "Best Plan in the West" for large-scale projects at the 1999 Pacific Coast Builders Conference. Mr. Goacher holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Sociology and Environmental Planning from California State University, Dominguez Hills and a Master of Public Administration degree from California State University, Fullerton. In addition, he has a certificate in Urban and Regional Planning from the University of California, Riverside and a certificate in CEQA/NEPA from the University of California, Irvine. He is also a member of the Congress for The New Urbanism (CNU)and member of the Board of Governers for Chapman Universite,School of Real Estate Development and Environmental Studies. He has guest lectured at California State University, Fullerton, on the subject of traditional neighborhood design. He has also been retained to teach "Boot Camp for New Planning Commissioners" by the American Planning Association, and to teach the Agua Caliente Indian Tribe's Tribal Planning Commission on the tenets of the land use decision-making process. CHANDRA KROUT,AICP Ms. Krout has experience in the management of a variety of projects ranging from comprehensive policy planning, environmental analysis, and wetland issues, and to regulatory entitlement through the regional governments, state, and federal authorities. Ms. Krout brings a practical planning orientation to all RGP projects, which is reflected in her pragmatic and thorough approach. Her background derives from both the public and private sectors, allowing her to develop effective strategies to engage and plan with clients. Ms. Krout has worked for the City of Newport Beach Planning Department and the San Luis Obispo County Planning Department, as well as former experience with private environmental/design consultancies. Ms. Krout has been involved in a wide range of projects in which her success in identifying, focusing on, and achieving superior results remains the benchmark of her contributions to a variety of organizations and projects.Additionally, Ms. Krout is an effective communicator, whether writing or speaking, and has the ability to make technical information understandable without trivializing content. She is committed to planning communities that are livable, pedestrian-oriented,environmental and economically sustainable. A specialty of Chandra's is her technical skills within Geographic Information Systems (GIS). This expertise is invaluable in environmental analysis where the overlap of competing objectives of resources is present. Chandra's published works center on GIS modeling of agricultural land use policies. She has also conducted view shed analyses for environmental documents to assure that both local policies and planning propriety are protected. Because of these in-house skills, RGP utilizes current GIS and analysis technologies in the production of modeling forecasts and document production. Ms. Krout obtained her Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from the University of California, Santa Cruz, where she was heavily involved in community planning for local non-profits. Ms. Krout also earned a Masters of City RGP Planning&Development Services 24 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services and Regional Planning with Distinction from the School of Architecture, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Ms. Krout is a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), the Urban Land Institute(ULI)and the U.S.Green Building Council,Orange County Chapter(USGBC). JEREMY KROUT Mr. Krout's services at RGP primarily focus on the management and coordination of land use planning and entitlement projects. Through multiple years of planning practice and his advanced education, he has become intimately familiar with the federal,state and local development and environmental regulations,as well as their governmental processes. His past work has included successfully managing and processing several large-scale shopping center redevelopment projects, the environmental and public outreach process for a $28 million dollar highway improvement project,and a 6,000 residential unit development project.This work entailed the preparation and coordination of general plan amendments, zone changes, environmental impact reports, affordable housing policies and programs,development agreements, mitigation programs and more. Mr. Krout formerly held the position of Director of Planning and Building for the City of Guadalupe in Santa Barbara County. As Director, he managed all aspects of the department's operations, including budgeting, code enforcement, building, engineering and planning. In this role, Mr. Krout also managed several key projects in the City, including a comprehensive update of the City's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, as well as the City's General Plan. He holds dual Bachelor of Arts degrees in Geography and Environmental Studies from University of California, Santa Barbara, and holds a Master of City and Regional Planning from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Mr. Krout is an active member and participant in the American Planning Association (APA), Urban Land Institute(ULI)and Building Industry Association(BIA). TIM BRILLHART Mr. Brillhart is a graduate of the Art Institute of Seattle with a degree in Visual Communications. He brings more than fifteen years experience as an artist and a graphics professional to RGP. His talents include design, illustration, photography and a variety of digital art media. Tim directs the visual aspects for the firm's planning graphics, exhibits and special projects. One of his noteworthy accomplishments, outside the usual scope of planning projects, includes producing a first-place winning submittal to the California Mining Association's "Award for Excellence in Mine Reclamation." He also designed and created a museum exhibit at the Duarte Historical Museum, which displayed throughout the winter and spring of 2002.This exhibit was prepared for a client who had been invited to display its company's treasure of a local historical photo archive, which dated back to the turn of the 20th century. Mr. Brillhart has spent the majority of his professional career producing top-notch visual identity for clients and their products. He has the added capability to convey technical project concepts and objectives in a visual format, and the capability to produce top-notch graphics for any particular need. Ultimately, he adds the creative element that can make a good plan great. His goal is to bring visual continuity and excellence to all the projects RGP produces, believing that people respond most naturally and positively to visual communication. RGP Planning&Development Services 25 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services REFERENCES: Mr.Joel Kuperberg, Esq. Mr.Stephen Miles, Esq. Attorney City Attorney Serrano Water District City of Lake Elsinore 19021 E. Lincoln Street 130 S. Main St. Villa Park,California 92667 Lake Elsinore,California 92530 (714)641-5100 (714)393-3389 Bruce Jenson Ms. Lori Van Arsdale Senior Planner Councilperson Community Development Agency City of Hemet County of Alameda 425 East Florida Avenue 224 W.Winton Avenue, Room 111 Hemet,California 92532 Hayward, California 94544 (951)658-6505 (510)670-5400 Mr. Robert Schiffner Mr. Chuck Borkman, P.E. Mayor Pro Tern Engineer City of Lake Elsinore Irvine Ranch Water District 33450 Walham 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Lake Elsinore,California 92530 Irvine, California 92718 (951) 712-2598(cell) (949)453-5790 STATEMENT OF BUSINESS PRACTICE "RGP" and "RGP Planning & Development Services" are both properly registered dba's of Rick Goacher Planning, Inc.,a duly formed California Corporation.The firm complies with all business and corporation laws of the State of California and is guided by its Corporate Counsel, Adorno, Yoss, Alvardo & Smith, under the direction of Mr. Todd Spitzer, Esq., and Mr. Thomas A. Zeigler, Esq. Financial management of the firm's resources are guided by Lincoln Financial Advisors, under the direction of Mr.Jeffrey S. Duncan. RGP understands that the character of the firm reflects on our clients.Therefore, its Board of Directors actively guides the firm to maintain high ethical standards, actively participates in programs of social and civic responsibility, and remains open to examination by its clients and authorities. The key officers of the five- member board are Geoffrey K. Goacher,CEO,and Richard K. Goacher, President. RGP maintains business insurance, liability insurance, automobile insurance, workers compensation insurance, professional liability insurance, and liquid financial reserves in values appropriate to protect the interests of our clients,our employees, and the corporation itself. RGP Planning&Development Services 26 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services 1.5 PROJECT SCHEDULE RGP proposes the following schedule for the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program, and Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration. As proposed by RGP, the schedule assumes that the project will begin on September 15,2005. Below is a breakdown of the general categories for the schedule. EIR COMPLETION SCHEDULE Task Begin Date End Date Contract Awarded by City of San Jacinto N/A September 15,2005 Task 1: Project Initiation Meeting September 22,2005 Task 2: Assemble Background Info* September 22,2005 September 23,2005 Task 3: Prepare/Circulate NOP(including 5-day review September 26,2005 November 4,2005 of Admin Draft NOP by City Staff) Task 4: Prepare Administrative Draft EIR (including 5- October 3, 2005 January 2,2005 day review of Admin Draft EIR by City Staff) Task 5: Prepare Draft EIR January 3,2006 January 18,2006 45-day Public Review Period January 19, 2006 March 22,2006 Task 6: Prepare Admin Final (including 5-day review of March 23, 2006 April 24, 2006 Admin Draft Final EIR by City Staff) Task 7: Final EIR and Findings April 25,2006 April 28,2006 City Planning Commission Hearing to Certify Final EIR May 2006 and adopt CEQA Findings *Circulate Reclamation Plan to State Mining and Geology Board Executive Director for 45-day Comment Period ASSUMPTIONS • The scope, schedule, and cost provisions of this proposal are based upon several assumptions that are summarized below to further define the proposed scope of work. RGP recognizes that these assumptions may be subject to change by the City during the course of the project. While such changes would not necessarily result in modification of the scope, schedule, or cost, RGP must reserve the right to propose such modifications in the event of such changes. • Up to three (3)alternatives(including No Project Alternative)will be analyzed in the EIR, however, only the proposed project will be evaluated to a CEQA "Project Level." • Issues to be addressed in the EIR will be limited to those identified in this proposal. Issues that emerge after contract commencement are not included in the proposed scope of work. Although we have provided a thorough and comprehensive scope of work that will result in a legally defensible document, additional unforeseen issues may be raised through the public scoping process. • The project description and selection of project alternatives will be approved by the City before the environmental analysis is conducted. Re-analysis of issues as a result of changes to the approved project description are not included in the proposed scope of work. RGP Planning&Development Services 27 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services • City staff and responsible agencies will cooperate with the consultant team in a timely manner. Work will not be stopped or delayed by the City or others outside the study team. Should work be so stopped or delayed for a period exceeding sixty(60) days, RGP will be reimbursed for costs to date. Should work be stopped or delayed by others, RGP shall have the right to renegotiate costs of work required. • RGP assumes that there will only be one review of the Administrative Draft EIR and one review of the Administrative Final EIR by the City. The City will provide RGP with one (1) copy of the Administrative Draft EIR comments which consolidates all of the City's edits. • RGP does not propose to obtain necessary permits from other agencies such as the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G), or U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), but will consult with these agencies during preparation of the EIR. However, RGP can perform these services on a time-and-materials basis if requested by the City or the project applicant. • RGP does not propose to conduct specific water quality or hydrology studies for the project site. RGP will review studies prepared for the project applicant and request or prepare additional information as necessary to prepare an adequate EIR. • RGP assumes no liability for false information, if any,supplied by the applicant's consultants. • RGP printing costs assume 25 copies of the Draft EIR and 25 copies of the Final EIR, and will consist of one volume rather than multiple volumes. • No formal wetland delineations will be conducted as part of this scope of work. RGP will review studies prepared for the project applicant and request or prepare additional information as necessary to prepare an adequate EIR. No special-status species surveys are included in the Scope of Work, but can be conducted by RGP's consultant at additional cost. • Fifty-four (54) hours (not including related revisions to the document) are budgeted for preparing responses to comments on the Draft EIR. If excessive comments are received, additional budget in this area will be required. COST SUMMARY The cost information presented herein reflects RGP's "not-to-exceed" estimate of $139,530 for the work necessary to complete the EIR process. This cost estimate is based on our scope of work and our knowledge of similar projects. RGP will perform extra-contractual tasks on a time-and-materials basis at our standard burdened billing rates. RGP Planning&Development Services 28 Rocky Hollow Quarry September 7,2005 Environmental Impact Report/Staff Services rlr COST SUMMARY Environmental Impact Report Preparation and Staff Services IL._,4 September 2005 RGP SCOPE OF WORK R Goacher G Coacher 1 Krout C Krout T Brilihart P Goacher T Nguyen Total Costs Total Hours _Project Initiation/Design Team Coordination 4 _ 4 16 2 I 2 2 $3,080 30 Assemble Background Info/City Staff Coordination 8 2 11 24 2 $5,305 47 Preparation of IS/NOP 2 4 4 32 16 2 2 $6,090 62 Draft ADEIR Analysis Sections&MMRP 16 8 20 98 32 16 8 $19,930 198 Encore Land Partners, LLP Review of ADEIR/MMRP 8 2 8 16 4 4 2 $4,820 44 City Review of ADEIR/ MMRP 4 2 7 24 4 4 $4,545 45 Prepare DEIR/MMRP for Public Circulation 8 4 14 34 8 4 4 $7,960 76 Finalize Analysis Sections for FEIR 8 4 16 18 16 4 4 $7,390 70 Coordination with State Clearinghouse 2 4 2 8 2 2 $2,140 20 Preparation of Responses to Comments/Revisions to Doc 6 2 16 36 8 4 4 $7,770 76 Finalize Preparation of Findings of Fact 8 2 16 16 2 2 $5,220 46 Finalize Mitigation Monitoring&Reporting Program 8 6 16 28 8 4 2 $7,800 72 Compile Public Hearing FEIR 8 2 16 24 8 8 8 $7,480 74 Prepare NOC 2 2 6 2 2 $1,390 14 Prepare NOD/Post/Payment of Fees 2 2 4 4 2 $1,360 14 Duplication Costs/Miscellanous(Fed Ex, Postage)Costs $14,000 0 Staff Services i -30 30 210 20 j 20 30 $33,250 340 Subtotals 94 42 154 384 102 64 1 48 1 $139,530 888 ej RGP HOURLY RATES & BILLING POLICY RGP prefers to perform its professional services on an identified budget for an identified scope of work to minimize the chance for misunderstandings and conflict between the client and consultant. It is the policy of the firm to calculate its fee estimate based on the following hourly billing rates: Principal I $ 165.00/hour Principal II $ 140.00/hour Senior Associate $ 115.00/hour Associate $ 95.00/hour Professional Staff $ 90.00/hour Professional Support $ 80.00/hour Staff $ 70.00/hour Staff Support $ 50.00/hour At Client's express request, RGP will provide any and all of the following additional services: 1. Make revisions to graphics and text previously prepared by RGP where such requested revisions are clearly inconsistent with prior Client's approval or due to substantial changes in the lead agency or Client instructions will be billed at the hourly rates identified herein. 2. Prints or document printing will be billed directly to Client by the print company at no additional RGP administrative cost, or billed by RGP at cost plus fifteen percent(15%). All other reimbursable expenditures will be invoiced at cost plus fifteen percent(15%) handling fee. Mileage will be billed at forty-one cents($0.41)per mile. 3. RGP will provide Client with monthly invoices for services rendered and costs advanced. Each invoice shall be due and payable upon receipt,and delinquent thirty(30)days after its date. 4. In light of the obvious advantage of quickly resolving questions and disputes regarding RGP's billing while recollections are fresh, Client will notify RGP of questions or dissatisfaction it may have regarding any particular RGP invoice within fifteen (15)days of the invoice date. Invoice shall be deemed accepted if notification from the Client is not received by RGP within the 15-day period. 5. RGP may, at its sole discretion, stop work on Client's project should invoices not be paid within sixty (60)days of the oldest invoice date. 6_ Because of the importance of a good working relationship between Client and RGP, either party may terminate an Agreement by giving written notice to the other, provided only that such notice is given in good faith belief that the working relationship is less than satisfactory. In the event that this Agreement is for any reason terminated, then Client shall compensate RGP for whatever professional time and reimbursable expenses RGP has devoted to the project up to the time of the termination or must necessarily devote to the project thereafter due to governmental requirements or otherwise. 7. RGP will maintain general liability insurance, automobile insurance, worker compensation insurance and professional liability insurance to the benefit of the client during the entire life of any given contract. Costs for protection to the benefit of the client above that normally required and provided will be passed on to the client as a job cost extra. RGP Initials/Date Client Initials/Date Updated 3/05 20 Year Compendium of All Permitted Mining Operations For Which RGP Has Performed Services Page 1 of 2 Source Information Provided by the Department of Conservation, Office of Mine Reclamation MINE ID MINE NAME MINE OPERATOR LEAD AGENCY RGP SERVICE 91-01-0010 PLEASANTON PIT&MILL VULCAN MATERIALS/CALMAT ALMEDA COUNTY Financial Assurance Estimates 91-09-0004 CHILE BAR MINE PLACERVILLE INDUSTRIES, INC. EL DORADO COUNTY Amended Reclamation Plan 91-10-0010 SANGER CALMAT OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FRESNO COUNTY Visual Analysis/Draft Specific Plan 91-10-0024 CALMAT-FRESNO CALMAT OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FRESNO COUNTY Financial Assurance Estimates 91-15-0014 CALCITE CALIFORNIA PORTLAND CEMENT CO. KERN COUNTY Interim Management Permit 91-15-0037 WHEELER RIDGE VULCAN MATERIALS/CALMAT DIVISION KERN COUNTY Interim Management Permit 91-15-0041 CALMAT/SAN EMIGDIO VULCAN MATERIALS/CALMAT DIVISION KERN COUNTY Draft SMP/CUP/Reclamation Plan 91-19-0006 AZUSA PIT/IRWINDALE AZUSA LAND RECLAMATION IRWINDALE CITY Financial Assurance Estimates 91-19-0007 AZUSA QUARRY CEMEX INC. AZUSA CITY CUP Modifications/Visual/SMP-RP 91-19-0016 RELIANCE-IRWINDALE CALMAT COMPANY IRWINDALE CITY Financial Assurance Estimates 91-19-0017 SHELDON CALMAT COMPANY LOS ANGELES CITY Stormwater Storage Plan&FAE 91-19-0018 RELIANCE-AZUSA CALMAT COMPANY AZUSA CITY Financial Assurance Estimates 91-19-0019 BOULEVARD CALMAT COMPANY LOS ANGELES CITY Zoning&Amended Rec. Plan/Street Vacations 91-19-0020 PALMDALE CALMAT COMPANY PALMDALE CITY Urbanization Encroachment Analysis 91-19-0021 BIG ROCK CREEK CALMAT COMPANY LOS ANGELES COUNTY Amended Reclamation Plan/IMP/Compliance 91-19-0022 CALMAT-SUN VALLEY CALMAT COMPANY LOS ANGELES CITY Site Closure Documentation/FAE's 91-19-0023 DURBIN CALMAT COMPANY IRWINDALE CITY Financial Assurance Estimates 91-19-0033 PALMDALE SERVICE ROCK PRODUCTS CO. PALMDALE CITY Urbanization Encroachment Analysis 91-19-0035 FISH CANYON QUARRY AZUSA ROCK INC. AZUSA CITY Streambed Resoration/Regulatory Permits 91-19-0036 LANG STATION-SWEETWATER CALMAT COMPANY LOS ANGELES COUNTY IMP/FAE's/Compliance Analysis 91-19-0038 SOLEDAD CANYON MINE TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS LOS ANGELES COUNTY Financial Assurance Estimates 91-24-0004 SILVA PIT CALAVERAS MATERIALS INC. MERCED COUNTY Amended Reclamation Plan/Mine Expansion 91-24-0005 TRIPLE C/SNELLING CALAVERAS MATERIALS INC. MERCED COUNTY Amended Reclamation Plan/Mine Expansion 91-24-0006 LA GRANGE PIT CALAVERAS MATERIALS INC. MERCED COUNTY Amended Reclamation Plan/Mine Expansion 91-24-0019 CARSON#2 PIT CALAVERAS MATERIALS INC. MERCED COUNTY Amended Reclamation Plan/Site Closure 91-24-0038 WOOLSTEN HULME RANCH CALAVERAS MATERIALS INC. MERCED COUNTY Mining&Reclamation Plan&CUP/Legal 91-30-0004 OGLEBAY NORTON INDUSTRIAL SAND OGLEBAY NORTON INDUSTRIAL ORANGE COUNTY Due Diligence/Acquisition Strategy 91-30-0005 IRVINE LAKE HANSON AGGREGATES WEST,INC. ORANGE COUNTY Federal/State/Local Permitting/FAE's 91-30-0006 STARR ROBERTSON'S READY MIX ANAHEIM CITY Acquisition Strategy 91-30-0009 RANCHO MISSION VIEJO RIVERSIDE CEMENT COMPANY ORANGE COUNTY Amended Reclamation Plan/Site Closure 91-30-0010 IRVINE LAKE CALMAT CO ORANGE COUNTY Federal/State/Local Permitting/FAE's 91-30-0015 EL TORO MATERIALS PARCEL II EL TORO MATERIALS COMPANY LAKE FOREST CITY Amended Reclamation Plan/CEQA Analysis 91-30-0014 EL TORO MATERIALS PARCEL I EL TORO MATERIALS COMPANY LAKE FOREST CITY Litigation Analysis 91-33-0007 MOBILE SAND COMPANY STANDARD CONCRETE PRODUCTS RIVERSIDE COUNTY SMP/RP/EIR 91-33-0009 JACK RABBIT CANYON TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS RIVERSIDE COUNTY Site Closure Documentation/1603 Agreement 20 Year Compendium of All Permitted Mining Operations For Which RGP Has Performed Services Page 1 of 2 Source Information Provided by the Department of Conservation, Office of Mine Reclamation 91-33-0016 3M CORONA MINNESOTA MINING&MANUFACTURING(3M) RIVERSIDE COUNTY Litigation Analysis 91-33-0027 CORONA QUARRY CALMAT COMPANY CORONA CITY SMP/RP/EIR 91-33-0040 JUNIPER FLATS C.L. PHARRIS SAND&GRAVEL INC. RIVERSIDE COUNTY SMP/RP/EIR 91-34-0044 AEROJET MINING SITE AMERICAN RIVER AGGREGATES SACRAMENTO COUNTY Acquisition Strategy 91-36-0012 SAN BERNARDINO CALMAT COMPANY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Financial Assurance Estimates 91-36-0014 UPLAND PIT CALMAT COMPANY UPLAND CITY _Amended Reclamaiton Plan/CUP's 91-36-0023 ORO GRANDE QUARRY RIVERSIDE CEMENT COMPANY _SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Site Closure Documentation/FAEs 91-36-0038 BARSTOW SERVICE ROCK PRODUCTS BARSTOW CITY Amended Reclamation Plan/Expansion 91-36-0047 ORO GRANDE ROCK PLANT INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Compliance Documentation/FAE's 91-36-0059 FONTANA PIT HANSON AGG WEST, INC. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Amended Reclamation Plan(Boral) 91-36-0112 CAJON PASS SAND&GRAVEL CAMBRIAN CORPORATION _SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Acquisition Strategy 91-36-0137 CAJON CREEK CALMAT CO. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Habitat Conservation Plan Participation 91-37-0026 MISSION VALLEY CALMAT CO. SAN DIEGO CITY _Financial Assurance Estimates 91-37-0027 SLOAN CANYON SLOAN CANYON SAND COMPANY SAN DIEGO COUNTY Site Restoration/Closure Plan 91-37-0028 MISSION VALLEY-EX FENTON CALMAT CO. SAN DIEGO CITY Financial Assurance Estimates 91-37-0029 CARROLL CANYON CALMAT CO. SAN DIEGO CITY Amended Rec Plan/Specific Plan Development 91-37-0030 VULCAN-POWAY VULCAN MATERIALS POWAY CITY Financial Assurance Estimates/Noise Analysis 91-50-0003 WARNER CALAVERAS MATERIALS INC. STANISLAUS COUNTY Acquisition Strategy 91-50-0018 SCHMIDT PIT CALAVERAS MATERIALS INC. STANISLAUS COUNTY Acquisition Strategy 91-54-0007 LEMONCOVE RMC PACIFIC MATERIALS TULARE COUNTY Mining&Reclamation Plan&CUP/Legal 91-56-0007 EL RIO HANSON AGG-WEST, INC. VENTURA COUNTY Zoning Amendment&Strategies 91-56-0015 TAPO ROCK AND SAND, INC. TAPO ROCK AND SAND, INC. VENTURA COUNTY Mine Expansion Permitting Strategies 91-56-0018 FERRO-SATICOY CALMAT COMPANY VENTURA COUNTY Mine Expansion Permitting Strategies 1 91-56-0021 TAPO CANYON MINE P.W.GILLIBRAND CO./CZS CORP VENTURA COUNTY Mine Expansion Permitting Strategies 91-56-0024 ROSE AVENUE-SATICOY CALMAT CO. VENTURA COUNTY Mining&Reclamation Plan&CUP 91-56-0029 TOLAND PARK COUNTY OF VENTURA VENTURA COUNTY Acquisition Strategy r -1 a' Richard K.Goacher scl; PRESIDENT RGP Profile. Mr. Goacher is co-founder and Principal-in-Charge of RGP, primarily Education focusing on policy planning and regulatory services. Mr. Goacher has more Master of Public Administration (MPA) than 35 years of experience in urban planning and project management. California State University,Fullerton He has an exceptional ability to craft project-specific methods to navigate through the complex regulatory and entitlement processes of California and Bachelor of Arts,Sociology and Urban/ the federal government. Environmental Studies California State University,Dominguez Urban Planning & Entitlements. Mr. Goacher provides highly qualified Hills consulting services in urban and environmental planning. He has been involved with numerous politically and environmentally sensitive projects Professional Certificate in Environmental and issues, and has helped clients through the regulatory maze of the Impact Reporting federal, state, regional, and local permit processes. One of Mr. Goacher's University of California, Irvine focuses has been the development of methods and procedures to simplify Professional Certificate in Urban &Regional the permit and entitlement processes of several agencies. Using a Planning combination of thorough application materials, competent technical and University of California, Riverside analytical work, respect for agency personnel, and diligence during the processing phase, Mr. Goacher has been able to acquire hundreds of Awards&Merits regulatory permits and approvals for his clientele. These clients include Exemplary Service Resolutions, Lake Forest public agencies, industrial, commercial and residential land development City Council firms,and a variety of more specialized clientele such as the Cagney Family Trust Land Asset Value Enhancement, the Steve Lawrence / Edie Gorme Award of Merit,American Planning Family Trust,and many others. Association,Orange Section Merit Award, "Best in the West," Large Scale Environmental Planning. Mr. Goacher is an expert and "big-picture" Master Plan, PCBC strategist when it comes to dealing with the multiple levels of regulations. He has assisted private and public agencies throughout California in Representative Projects complying with the environmental requirements of CEQA, NEPA, the US Liberty Specific Plan (3,000 acres)and Army Corps of Engineers, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Master Mitigated Negative Declaration,City Department of Fish and Game. In addition to technically sound of Lake Elsinore environmental documentation and management, Mr. Goacher is respected for his ability to mitigate by design given a myriad of overlays ranging from International Trade and Transportation biological to acoustical impacts. He strongly believes that the CEQA Center Specific Plan and EIR(700 acres), document must present the description of the project and the impact Kern County analyses in a manner that is understandable to the public, interested Pacificana New Town Specific Plan and agencies,and the decision-makers. Project-Level EIR(4,600 acres), Kern County Mining and Reclamation. Mr. Goacher has worked on more than 75 Irvine Lake"Programmatic Operations and aggregate and construction materials projects throughout California, Maintenance Plan,"Orange County involving preparing new mining and reclamation plans, renewal and Tejon Industrial Complex -East Specific Plan processing of permits, preparing various environmental and technical (1,100 acres)and Initial Study, Kern County studies, conducting mine assessments and compliance reviews, providing regulatory agency liaison, providing financial assurance estimates, and Contract Environmental Consultant to Irvine documenting mine closure. Ranch Water District(IRWD) Professional Leadership. Mr. Goacher currently serves as a Planning Contract Environmental Consultant to Commissioner for the County of Orange, and formerly for the City of Lake Serrano Water District(SWD) Forest. He frequently presents at industry events on various planning Zone 7 Water Storage Conservation subjects, including: "Understanding your Opposition," California Mining Reclamation Program(JPA),Alameda County Association 2005 Annual Conference; "Planner's Boot Camp," American Contract Environmental Consultant,City of Planning Association, 2002;"Understanding the Other Regulatory Process," Westminster 2004 CMA Annual Conference; "Secrets to Successful Projects, a Ten-Step Program,"Construction Materials Association 2001 Annual Conference. 8921 Research Drive,Irvine,CA 92618• Phone:(949)450-0171 Ext 309• Fax:(949)450-0182• Email: rgoacher@rgpcorp.com 1 '1 13l Jeremy C. Krout SENIOR ASSOCIATE RGP Profile. Mr. Krout is a highly skilled policy planner with a strong Education background in federal, state and local government regulations and Master of City and Regional Planning processes. Mr. Krout is detail oriented and has formidable research California Polytechnic State University at experience and leadership abilities. He is also exceptionally skilled in a San Luis Obispo wide spectrum of computer applications including ESRI ArcView GIS, Microsoft Office Suite and Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator. Prior to Dual Bachelor of Arts Degrees,Geography and joining RGP, Mr. Krout worked as an Associate Planner for the City of Environmental Studies Lake Forest and as Planning Director for the City of Guadalupe. University of California Santa Barbara Policy Planning. Mr. Krout manages and coordinates land use planning and entitlement projects, and prepares general plan amendments, Professional Affiliations zone changes, environmental impact reports, affordable housing policies and programs, development agreements and mitigation American Planning Association(APA) programs. He has significant experience in creating entitlement Building Industry Association (BIA) documents based on sound research and well articulated master plan designs. Mr. Krout is skilled at dissecting master plans into specific Urban Land Institute(ULI) plan documents, element-by-element, to ensure entitlements are consistent with state government codes and local ordinances. He is able to do this while maintaining plans' intentions and creating Representative Projects implementation mechanisms that are not overly complex. General Plans, Development Codes and Specific Plans Public Agency Experience. Mr. Krout's career experience has focused distinctively on the public sector. He is deeply knowledgeable in City of Guadalupe General Plan Update government planning practices, and has played a key role in several City of Lake Forest Comprehensive General public agency projects. In addition to the projects listed to the right, Mr. Plan Amendment/Update Krout has led the efforts for an Opportunities Study for the City of Lake Forest to determine impacts of a several hundred-acre land use re- City of Guadalupe Zoning Code and designation from Business Park to Residential, the re-development of Subdivision Code several prime parcels into regional shopping centers and development Environmental Impact Reports of citywide building/planning permit and code enforcement tracking systems and GIS. Mr. Krout is also experienced in mediating El Toro Road Widening and Landscape discussions and negotiations between developers and city officials. Improvement Project,Lake Forest, California Professional Leadership. Mr. Krout was a lecturer at California Saddleback Valley Plaza Shopping Center Polytechnic State University for an undergraduate course that taught Demolition and Re-Development, Lake computer applications for planners, including presentation skills, Forest,California multimedia, GIS and graphic/imaging programs. In Guadalupe, Mr. Krout headed the Building, Planning and Code Enforcement DJ Farms 300-acre Specific Plan, Departments for the City, where he was responsible for budget Guadalupe,California preparation, project oversight, personnel, coordinating Planning Commission meetings and Department representation at City Council meetings. Other Training Mr. Krout has completed a U.C.L.A. Extension Course on "Designing and Implementing Effective Zoning Ordinances,"a week- long series of technical workshops at the 2001 E.S.R.I. GIS International Users' Conference, and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)Permit Implementation Training. 8921 Research Drive, Irvine,CA 92618•Phone:(949)450-0171 Ext.311•Fax:(949)450-0182 • Email:jkrout@rgpcorp.com 7 1 Geoffrey K.Goacher CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER RGP Profile. Mr. Goacher is the co-founder and CEO of RGP. He oversees the Education development of the firm's long-range vision and business plan, as well as Master of Science, Environmental Studies manages the professional development of the firm's staff and their California State University,Fullerton operating practices. These activities ensure that the firm is continually growing and improving in a healthy and optimum manner. Bachelor of Arts,Geography In addition to overseeing the corporation, Mr. Goacher provides services in California State University,Fullerton urban and environmental planning, impact assessment and analysis, project management, plan development, CEQA and NEPA documentation, Professional Affiliations regulatory compliance matters and community relations. Mr. Goacher is an accomplished environmental scientist, whose work has been published in Association of Environmental Professionals numerous trade magazine articles and books. (AEP) American Planning Association(APA) Urban and Environmental Planning. Mr. Goacher's planning experience Institute of Noise Control Engineering(INCE) spans a diverse range of project types and clientele. The focus of his professional experience has involved project management and environmental planning namely targeted at completing the processes required by CEQA, the state resources agencies, and local lead agencies Representative Projects throughout California. He has prepared or co-authored numerous certified Wilson Creek Environmental Impact Report, CEQA environmental impact reports, mitigated negative declarations, and Riverside County,California initial studies. He has also successfully prepared and processed over one hundred permit applications including conditional use permits, reclamation Mescal Creek Environmental Impact Report, plans,404/1602 permits and all forms of building and ministerial permits. Los Angeles County,California Pacificana Specific Plan and Environmental Mr. Goacher manages a number of RGP's environmental impact analysis Impact Report,Kern County,California services and methodologies, including visual impact assessments, agricultural impact assessments, land use impact assessments, and noise Big Rock Creek Mitigated Negative impact assessments. He is a recognized expert on the subject of acoustics Declaration, Los Angeles County,California and noise control. In this field, Mr. Goacher has conducted numerous Liberty Specific Plan Amendment,City of Lake habitat noise monitoring studies, community noise surveys, impact Elsinore,California assessments, and architectural acoustics designs. He has authored technical articles on sound and acoustics for professional publications and Sanger Visual Impact Assessment,Fresno magazines. He is also a contributing author to McGraw-Hill's "Master County, California Handbook of Acoustics, 4th Edition," which has been the top-selling book Azusa Rock Visual Impact Assessment,City of on the subject for nearly two decades. Azusa,California Professional Leadership. Mr. Goacher has served as a guest lecturer on Poway Noise Impact Assessment and environmental issues on many occasions at California State University, Monitoring Plan,City of Poway,California Fullerton,as well as Golden West College.Whenever possible,he continues Sycamore Shade Noise Impact Assessment, to speak at various professional conferences. In 2005,he will be a featured City of Simi Valley,California speaker at the California Mining Association's annual conference in Squaw Valley. He will be speaking on the topic of understanding the various Strawberry Flats Noise Impact Assessment, environmental groups that typically oppose development projects and how City of Chino,California to neutralize their impacts to any given project. Pala Mesa Highlands,CEQA Study Peer Review Technical Experience. Mr. Goacher is certified as a noise control engineer and Management,San Diego County, by the Institute of Noise Control Engineers. He is proficient in the various California noise modeling programs published by the FHWA and CalTrans. He is also Irvine Lake 404/1601/401 Permits,SMARA proficient in the visual resource management methodologies of the FHWA Reclamation Plan,Site Development Permits, and BLM, which are utilized for the completion of visual impact Encroachment Permits,Grading Permits, assessments. Building Permits, Electrical Permits,County of Orange, California 8921 Research Drive,Irvine,CA 92618•Phone:(949)450-0171 Ext.313•Fax:(949)450-0182•Email:ggoacher@rgpcorp.com I e Tim J. Brillhart 2,J DIRECTOR OF VISUAL R G P COMMUNICATIONS Profile. Mr. Brillhart directs the visual aspects for the firm's planning Education graphics, exhibits and special projeects. He is a professional graphics designer specializing in digital art media, presentations, photography, Art Institute of Seattle illustration, and artistry of printed documents. Mr. Brillhart creatively Visual Communications,Seattle, WA conveys project concepts and objectives in a visual format and has the ability to produce high-quality graphics to meet various needs. His work is intended to bring visual continuity and excellence to every client's Professional Experience project. Art Director/Production Manager- Printed Clothing Industry Visual Impact Assessments. Mr. Brillhart was co-developer of RGP's unique visual impact assessment methodology. It utilizes industry Small Business Owner- Freelance Graphic standard methods for visual impact studies but differs in its application Artist of techniques and terminology resulting in a more concise objective Project Manager- Digital Presentations and report. Mr. Brillhart specializes in the creation of photo simulations that Photo/Graphics departments are an intrinsic part of visual impact assessment studies. Advertising Agency-Assistant Art Director Visual Simulations. Visual simulations have become recognized as a valuable tool in many planning processes. Mr. Brillhart has completed numerous visual simulations for environmental impact reports, CEQA Projects Highlights documents and various development projects such as Azusa Rock Community Presentations Expansion, Sanger/Centerville Expansion Project and The Proposed Escondido concrete and asphalt plant project. Mr. Brillhart is Vulcan Materials Company,Azusa Rock continually refining his skills with visual simulations and is committed Expansion Project-Community Presentation to advancing RGP's capabilities in the field. Vulcan Materials Company,Sanger/ Technical Experience. Mr. Brillhart has a varied palette of technical Centerville Expansion Project Community skills. He has the ability to create visual media for a variety of needs Presentation including: Beazer Homes, Pala Mesa Highlands, Community Presentation • Graphic Design •Graphic Information Systems(GIS) • Document Graphics •Computer Aided Design (CAD) Tejon Ranch Industrial Complex,Specific •Project Exhibits •PowerPoint Presentations Plan - Planning Commission Presentation •Web Applications •Photography and Photo Simulations Sage Communities, River's Edge Planning • Plan Illustratives Commission Presentation Corporate Communications. Most of RGP's communications materials Visual Impact Assessments are developed using Mr. Brillhart's visual expertise and artistic eye. From community presentations to the company's brochure and website, Vulcan Materials Company,Azusa Rock his creative vision has helped build a recognizable name and brand. Expansion Project Professional Recognition. One of his noteworthy accomplishments, Vulcan Materials Company,Sanger/ outside the usual scope of planning projects, includes producing a first- Centerville Expansion Project place winning submittal to the California Mining Association's "Award City of Escondido Proposed concrete and for Excellence In Mine Reclamation." He also designed and created a asphalt plant project, museum exhibit at the Duarte Historical Museum, which displayed throughout the winter and spring of 2002.This exhibit was prepared for Vulcan Materials Company Big Rock a client who had been invited to display their company's treasured local Creek CEQA historical photo archive, which dates back to the turn of the 20th century. 8921 Research Drive,Irvine,CA 92618•Phone:(949)450-0171 Ext.312• Fax:(949)450-0182 •Email:tbrillhart@rgpcorp.com r - t Thy T. Nguyen to ac/, TECHNICAL EDITOR RGP Profile. Ms. Nguyen ensures that project deliverables are presented in Education a clear,concise fashion. She proofreads, edits and formats documents Bachelor of Arts,Communication so as to convey information that is thorough and consistent. University of Washington,Seattle, WA Environmental Analysis. Ms. Nguyen has managed the editing and presentation of CEQA documentation for various entitlement projects. Certificate in Broadcast Media Issue areas that she focuses on involve the required consistency of University of Washington,Seattle, WA technical information presented in CEQA documents with technical reports required for addressing issues such as biology, acoustics, and air quality. Professional Affiliations Building Industry Association(BIA) Project Management. Ms. Nguyen coordinates team communication and manages project deliverables. Furthermore, Ms. Nguyen provides administrative support for multiple sub-consultants within project Representative Projects teams, schedules meetings and conference calls, and prepares presentations. Ms. Nguyen is also responsible for the maintenance of Specific Plans technical and historical planning and entitlement information in RGP's Tejon Industrial Complex Specific Plan, research database. County of Kern Technical Writing. Ms. Nguyen specializes in translating complex CEQA information into simple and easily understandable language. She is Kings River Aggregate Gravel Supplemental responsible for the format structure of all Mining and Reclamation Environmental Impact Report,County of Plans that are reviewed by the State Mining and Geology Board, and Fresno ensures compliance with SMARA regulations and code requirements. Ms.Nguyen also helps write project proposals and proofreads Requests Amendment to SMP-16 Vested Mining for Qualifications. She also helped write and design the RGP company Permit Reclamation Plan Mitigated Negative brochure. Declaration, County of Alameda Surface Mining and Reclamation Plans Technical Skills. Ms. Nguyen has extensive knowledge of various computer applications, and has a background in designing web pages Surface Mining and Reclamation Plan for and graphics. Carroll Canyon, City of San Diego 8921 Research Drive,Irvine,CA 92618•Phone:(949)450-0171 Ext.300•Fax:(949)450-0182 •Email:tnguyen@rgpcorp.com ' ' '' Pamela J. Goacher ,111 RESEARCH & R G p ADMINISTRATION Profile. Ms. Goacher is co-founder of RGP Planning & Development Education Services. She is responsible as Corporate Secretary/Treasurer for all Registered Nurse operations whether business or professional, contract administration, Harbor College,School of Nursing interface with corporate counsel and financial advisors, and for timely filing of corporate forms with local, state, and federal agencies. Ms. Professional Certificate,Cardiac Care Goacher is also responsible for standards assurance in support of the Kaiser Permanente firm's Professional Liability Insurance (E&0). She is responsible for professional interface and relations with local, state, and federal Professional Certificate,Advance Cardiac Life agencies and regulators in the collection of project data, and is chiefly Support responsible for clients' conditions of approval, mitigation monitoring American Red Cross and permit compliance assurance. Experience. Ms. Goacher served as a Research Assistant since 1980 Representative Projects with two different urban and regional planning firms. She is chiefly responsible for data collection and analysis in support of both CEQA- Irvine Lake, Environmental&Reclamation based environmental documents for public review and agency decision- Monitoring; Irvine Ranch Water District making,and for public policy documents such as focused issue studies, policy papers, master plans, general plans, and possible legislative Domestic Water Supply Line; Pre Emergency acts. and Post-Project CEQA/NEPA Documentation -Santiago Oaks Wilderness,Serrano Water Ms. Goacher is a significant participant in the analysis and preparation District of the Pacificana New Town Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report Oak Tree Mitigation and Monitoring Plan; (Kern County, CA), International Trade and Transportation Center Silverado and Santiago Canyons; County of Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (Kern County, CA), Goshen Orange Property Fairy Shrimp Habitat Conservation Plan & Mitigation Program, the Allen Group (Visalia, CA), Community Housing Partners, LLC - Fish Creek Realignment and Rehabilitation Senior Housing Environmental Impact Report (Westminster, CA), Plan, Fish Canyon;Angeles National Forest, mitigation monitoring reports for Shady Canyon Planned Community USDA (Irvine),and many other CEQA-based projects. Coal Canyon Mountain Lion Corridor;Coal Canyon Road Closure;County of Orange,CA Special studies include responsibilities for the Sun Valley Community Aesthetics study (Los Angles City Council President, Alex Padilla), Corona Quarry Surface Mine/Temescal Creek research and reporting for site acquisitions (Vulcan Materials Reclamation Compliance Monitoring;Corona, Company), research and reporting for site acquisitions for Lehigh CA Southwest and for California Portland Cement Corporation, site Shady Canyon Mitigation Monitoring and acquisition assistance to P.W. Gillibrand Company, and participated in Reporting, Irvine Company; Irvine,CA numerous special studies for the Irvine Company, Serrano Water District and Irvine Ranch Water District at Irvine Lake(Orange County). Most recent notable accomplishment has been in resolution of public agency and private property owners dispute over disposition of the Santiago Canyon Road Over crossing(bridge structure), locally referred to as the "Bat Bridge." An interim roadway bridge became the roost for two species of seasonal bats, primarily the Mexican free-tail bat. The bridge was to be removed by its private owner by order of the local agency. However, environmental groups became active to block that action. Through a five-party agreement, required 22 mouths to negotiate, the bridge was saved, the roosts secured, and all parties made whole. 8921 Research Drive,Irvine,CA 92618•Phone:(949)450-0171 Ext 302•Fax:(949)450-0182•Email:pgoacher@rgpcorp.com II I r , Chandra K. Krout,AICP, ' p LEED AP R G P ASSOCIATE Profile. Ms. Krout is a certified planner specializing in environmental Education resource analysis, public policy planning,geographic-based information Master of City and Regional Planning with systems, issue-oriented research, regulatory permits and the Distinction development of entitlement applications and supporting materials. Her California Polytechnic State University at experience includes both private and public sector planning San Luis Obispo organizations with a well-rounded knowledge of permitting processes, program implementation, public policy formulation, and environmental Bachelor of Arts,Political Science planning and design. Prior to joining RGP,she worked as a Planner for University of California Santa Cruz the City of Newport Beach and FORMA, and as a Mapping/ Graphics Systems Specialist for the County of San Luis Obispo. Professional Affiliations Urban Planning. Ms. Krout is skilled in preparing policy documents such as Master Plans, Specific Plans and Development Standards. American Institute of Certified Planners(AICP) Through the years, she has prepared and processed numerous Urban Land Institute(ULI) discretionary applications including conditional use permits, site plan reviews and pre-applications for coastal development permits, and Accredited Professional with the U.S.Green several zoning code amendments ranging from tract map issues to Building Council,Orange County Chapter development reviews. As a pre-requisite for this work,she is trained in (USGBC) the operation of effective due diligence for large entitlement projects. Urban Land Institute(ULI) Environmental Planning Ms. Krout is intimately familiar with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for purposes of preparing Representative Projects initial studies, negative declarations, mitigated negative declarations, and environmental impact reports. She has experience in preparing General Plans environmental documentation for projects that involve Section 404 City of Newport Beach General Plan Update Permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and California Department of Fish and Game 1603 streambed alteration agreements. Local Coastal Plan,City of Newport Beach This works requires her to maintain a thorough understanding of Specific Plans Regional Water Quality Control Board regulations for 401 Permits. Foothill Center Specific Plan,City of Azusa Professional Leadership. Ms. Krout is serving as a Planning and Canyon Hills Specific Plan,City of Los Transportation Commissioner for the City of Mission Viejo, California. Angeles She has been a session presenter at the 2001 E.S.R.I.GIS International Users'Conference and an author of"How Should Municipalities Handle Tejon Industrial Complex Specific Plan, Agriculture Conversion" article for Orange County American Planning County of Kern Association (OCAPA) Newsletter. She conducted public workshops for Newhall Ranch Specific Plan,County of the City of Newport on a variety of projects including the City's General Ventura Plan Update Visioning Process. These projects have led her to become a skilled presenter, including experience making presentations to Rice Ranch Specific Plan,County of Santa planning commissions and city councils on a wide range of issues. Barbara Technical CEQA Experience. Ms. Krout has created numerous maps for planning and environmental documents including several cost-benefit Kings River Aggregate Gravel Supplemental analyses of existing development density utilizing the building footprint, Environmental Impact Report,County of population predictions, and habitat constraint overlays. She is also Fresno extremely proficient in Adobe Photoshop, AutoDesk Architectural Desktop and Microsoft Office Suite. 15th Street Town homes,Olson Company, Mitigated Negative Declaration,City of Other Training. She has completed a course in Light Construction and Newport Beach Development Management; a U.C.L.A. Extension Course on Designing Amendment to SMP-16 Vested Mining and Implementing Effective Zoning Ordinances; and the American Permit Reclamation Plan Mitigated Negative Environmental Professions (AEP) 2004 Workshop Series on Declaration.County of Alameda "Understanding CEQA." 8921 Research Drive,Irvine,CA 92618•Phone:(949)450-0171 Ext.310• Fax:(949)450-0182•Email:ckrout@rgpcorp.com r?treci COST SUMMARY Environmental Impact Report Preparation and Staff Services ./ Revised November 2005 RGP SCOPE OF WORK R Goacher G.Goacher I Krout C Krout T finllhart P.Goacher T Nguyen Total Costs total I lours Project Initiation/Design Team Coordination • 4 4 16 2 2 2 $3,080 30 Assemble Background Info/City Staff Coordination 8 2 11 24 2 $5.305 47 Preparation of IS/NOP 2 4 4 32 16 2 2 $6.090 62 Draft ADEIR Analysis Sections&MMRP 16 8 20 98 32 16 8 $19,930 198 Encore Land Partners, LLP Review of ADEIR/MMRP 8 2 8 16 4 4 2 $4,820 44 City Review of ADEIR/MMRP 4 2 7 24 4 4 $4,545 45 Prepare DEIR/MMRP for Public Circulation 8 4 14 34 8 4 4 $7,960 76 Finalize Analysis Sections for FEIR 8 4 16 18 16 4 4 $7,390 70 Coordination with State Clearinghouse 2 4 2 8 2 2 $2,140 20 Preparation of Responses to Comments/Revisions to Doc. 6 2 16 36 8 4 4 $7,770 76 Finalize Preparation of Findings of Fact 8 2 16 16 2 2 $5,220 46 Finalize Mitigation Monitoring&Reporting Program 8 6 16 28 8 4 2 $7,800 72 Compile Public Hearing FEIR 8 2 16 24 8 8 8 $7,480 74 Prepare NOC 2 2 6 2 2 $1,390 14 Prepare NOD/Post/Payment of Fees 2 2 4 4 2 $1,360 14 Duplication Costs/Miscellanous(Fed Ex, Postage)Costs $6,500 0 Staff Services 30 30 210 20 20 30 $33,250 340 Subtotals 94 42 154 384 102 64 48 $132,030 888 Subrogation Fee(3%of Total Fee) ' I $3.961 0 Revised Subtotal I $135,991 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this November 17th, 2005 by and between the City of San Jacinto, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 248 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California ("City") and RGP Planning and Development Services ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as "Party"and collectively as "Parties." 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant. Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in preparing environmental documents and providing professional staff services to public clients. 2.2 Project. City desires to engage Consultant to render services for the processing of entitlement applications and preparing their related environmental documentation in the City of San Jacinto ("Project") as set forth in this Agreement. 3. TERMS. 3.1 Scope of Services and Term. 3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional consulting services necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 1 3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from November 17th, 2005 to June 30th, 2006, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant. 3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City. 3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Geoff Goacher, Rick Goacher, Chandra Krout, Jeremy Krout, and Tim Brillhart. 2 3.2.5 City's Representative. The City hereby designates Tim Hults, Community Development Director, or his/her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City's Representative or his/her designee. 3.2.6 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Rick Goacher or his/her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.2.8 Standard of Care: Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project. 3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, 3 pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.2.10 Insurance. 3.2.10.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence Work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subcontractor has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.2.10.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto); and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 3.2.10.3 Professional Liability. Consultant shall procure and maintain, and require its sub-consultants to procure and maintain, for a period of three (3) years, if economically feasible, following completion of the Project, errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to their profession. Such insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per claim with a $1,000,000 aggregate, and shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. 4 3.2.10.4 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms supplied or approved by the City to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. The general liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be covered as additional insured with respect to the Work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work; and(2)the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (B) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall state that: (A) coverage shall not be suspended, voided, reduced or canceled except after thirty(30) days prior written notice has been given to the City; and (B) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. 3.2.10.5 Separation of Insureds; No Special Limitations. All insurance required by this Section shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions. 3.2.10.6 Deductibles and Self-Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. 5 3.2.10.7 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California. 3.2.10.8 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the City before work commences. 3.2.11 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.3 Fees and Payments. 3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed $135,991 without written approval of City's Representative. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. City retains the right to request Consultant to cease rendering Services for the Project for any or no reason whatsoever, at any time and without prior notice to Consultant. In the event that the City requests Consultant to cease rendering Services, Consultant shall cease performing the Services under this Agreement immediately. Consultant shall be compensated for the Services completed up until the point at which the City requests Consultant to cease rendering Services. City shall not be liable for any costs whatsoever that Consultant incurs thereafter. 6 3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City. 3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City's Representative. 3.4 Accounting Records. 3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3)years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.5 General Provisions. 3.5.1 Termination of Agreement. 3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen(15) days of the request. 3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 7 3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: Consultant: RGP Planning and Development Services 8921 Research Drive Irvine, CA 92618 Attn: Rick Goacher City: City of San Jacinto 248 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Attn: Tim Hults, Community Development Director Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality. 3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 3.5.3.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing 8 furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 3.5.4 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.5.5 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all other costs of such action. 3.5.6 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged acts, omissions or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, in this Agreement. 3.5.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.5.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in San Bernardino County. 3.5.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.5.10 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.5.11 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties. 3.5.12 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 9 3.5.13 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement. 3.5.14 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.5.15 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 3.5.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.5.17 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.5.18 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement,no member,officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.5.19 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race,religion, color,national origin,handicap, ancestry,sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority 10 Nov 10 05 11 : 43a RGP p. 2 3.5.20 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.5.21 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 3.5.22 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.6 Subcontracting. 3.6.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. CITY OF SAN JACINTO Consultant By: By: R6-e Fla fln� n!14 � �VeJo irl64-- Attest: Se(vfC City Clerk Approved as to Form: Best Best&Krieger LLP City Attorney 12 EXHIBIT"A" SCOPE OF SERVICES To:Timothy Hults From: Marilyn Castelan 11/10/2005 09:49:45 (Page 2 of 3) *CORD, CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE D11 2/2005 PRODUCER (949)581-2333 FAX (949)460-5391 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Ayl or Insurance Agency Inc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 23710 El Toro Road, Suite H HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. P.O. Box 338 Lake Forest, CA 92630 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED Rick Goacher Planning, Inc. INSURER* The Hartford 8921 Research Drive INSURERB: Hudson Specialty Ins. Co Irvine, CA 92618 INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADDL. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATIONMf LITS NMfM/YY) RATE(NYIMIVY) GENERAL UABIUTY 72 SBA CZ5612 SC 12/10/2004 12/10/2005 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY DAMAGE TO RENTED $ 300 000 PRFE�ICFR(Fa m.-ura.v-i4 1 CLAIMS MADE n OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 A PERSONAL d ADV INJURY $ 2,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 4,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PEF PRODUCTS•COMP/OP AGG $ 4,000,000 POLICY n jECT LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT ANY AUTO (Ea accident) $ 2,000,000 ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) A X HIRED AUTOS 72 SBA CZ5612 SC 12/10/2004 12/10/2005 BODILY INJURY $ X NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY. AGG $ EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABLITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ OCCUR ❑ CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC WITS OS FR TORY I TH- EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY IMIT ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? E.L.DISEASE•EA EMPLOYE`$ If yes,describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below F.L.DISEASE•POLICY I IMIT $ FProYessional Liability FEC5104255 12/17/2004 12/17/2005 S2,000,000 Agg B $1,000,000 per Occur. $10,000 Ded DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS(VEHICLES I EXCLUSIONS ADFIED BY ENDORSEMENT I,SPECIAL PROVISJQNS Those usual to the Insured's Operations. City or San Jacino, its (Jirecrors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers are named additional insured per the Business Liability Coverage form SS00008 attached to this policy. Coverage is primary and non-contributory per the Business Liability Coverage form 550008 attached to this policy. *Except 10 days for non payment of premium. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRMED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WLL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL *30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, City of San Jacinto BUT FALURE TO MAL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR UABLITY 248 E. Main St. OF ANY KIND UPON THE MSURER,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. San Jacinto, CA 92583 AUTOO ¢EDREPRESENAATIVE ACORD 25(2001/08) - ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 To:Timothy Hults From: Marilyn Castelan 11/10/2005 09:49:45 (Page 1 of 3) F A X • • • • • Aylor Insurance Agency, Inc. • 23832 Rockfield Blvd. Ste 130 • Lake Forest CA, 92630 To: Timothy Hults Company: City of San Jacinto Fax number: 1-951-537-6387 From: Marilyn Castelan Company: Aylor Insurance Agency, Inc. Fax number: 949-581-2814 Business phone: 949-581-2333 Home phone: Address: 23832 Rockfield Blvd. Ste 130 Lake Forest CA, 92630 Date_Time: 11/10/2005, 9:49:45 AM Pages: 3 Re: Certificate of Insurance - Rick Goacher Planning, Inc Please see following certificate showing the E & 0 coverage also. If you have any questions or need addtional information please give me a call. Regards, Sue Dorish Aylor Insurance Agency, Inc. 949-581-2333 fax 949-581-2814 marilyn.castelan@aia-inc.com To:Timothy Hults From: Marilyn Castelan 1 1/1 0/2005 09:49:45 (Page 3 of 3) IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s),authorized representative or producer,and the certificate holder,nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend,extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD 25(2001/08) AGENDA ITEM 4, 1 November 17, 2005 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tim Hults, Community Development Directory Steven G. Pasarow, Redevelopment Operations Manager SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Public Hearing for Selection of Projects and Programs and Activities for Fiscal Year 2006/2007 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Conduct a public hearing to consider comments regarding the use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for Fiscal Year 2006/2007; 2. By motion, approve the Community Service Programs and Activities to be sponsored by non-profit organizations and funded for Fiscal Year 2006/2007. 3. By motion, approve the Community Facilities Projects to be sponsored through the City of San Jacinto and funded for Fiscal Year 2006/2007. BACKGROUND: The City of San Jacinto receives an annual allocation of federal dollars through the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Program. These funds are provided to cooperating cities through the Riverside County Economic Development Agency (EDA). For Fiscal Year 2006/2007, the city expects to receive approximately $213,000. Of this amount, not more than 15%, or $31,950 may be used for public service programs and activities that benefit the low and moderate income population of the community and the balance of available funds must be utilized for public facilities projects, i.e., construction of infrastructure and like improvements, and programs such as providing low income housing, economic development, and code enforcement. Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: DISCUSSION The CDBG Program brings federal dollars to local communities for the purpose of assisting low-and moderate income residents through public services, infrastructure improvements, economic development projects, and the elimination of blight. Funds are allocated through a formula based on total population and the number of low and moderate income households in each city. To be eligible for CDBG funding a program or project must meet one of three following national objectives: • Activities benefiting low and moderate income persons/households. • Activities which aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. • Activities designed to meet community needs having a particular urgency. Programs and/or projects must also meet the eligibility requirements of the Riverside County CDBG program, through which the City of San Jacinto receives its annual funding allocation. Of the$213,000 in anticipated funding, a maximum of 15% may be used on public service programs and activities and the balance of funds must be used for public facilities projects and non-public service programs. This amount may be adjusted upward or downward by HUD depending upon funding circumstances beyond the city's control. Our actual allocation will not be known until early into calendar year 2006. At that time, if our allocation differs greatly from the amount anticipated in this report, the County of Riverside Economic Development Agency will determine the actual dollar amount that each City Council approved program and project will receive based upon the allocation of funds that they receive from HUD. As a requirement of receiving CDBG funds, the city must provide the opportunity for public comment regarding proposed program and project funding. This Public Hearing provides that opportunity for the public. The City Council Sub-Committee for the Review of Community Development Block Grant Applications has reviewed all applications received and provided its recommendations for the full City Council's review. The City Council may, after taking public comment, choose to fund all or part of the programs and projects recommended by the committee or consider other requests from the public to fund programs or projects for which no application has been prepared as yet. If all funds are not allocated during this public hearing, another public hearing is scheduled for December 01, 2005, if necessary, to receive additional comments from the public and allow the City Council to allocate the remaining funds to programs and projects. These meetings allow for public input and for the City Council to allocate funding to those programs and projects that it feels are most in need. The Notice of Funding Availability was published in the Press-Enterprise on September 13, 14 & 15, 2005. The Notice of Public Hearing has been published in the Press-Enterprise during the weeks of November 8 and November 22, 2005. Page 2 45 The city received a total of seven applications for non-profit sponsored programs and activities requesting funding in the total amount of $76,220.00 and two city sponsored applications for public facilities projects and Code Enforcement activities totaling $260,000.00. All of these applications have been reviewed and evaluated by the Sub- Committee for the Community Development Block Grant Program and the committee's recommendations have been provided in the attached summary (Page 4) for the full City Council's consideration and approval. Also attached is a summary of the projects, programs and activities funded during the current program year FY 05-06 (Page 5). During its review, the sub-committee noted that funding for Code Enforcement will be provided through the general fund in the upcoming and future years and would no longer be funded through the CDBG Program, allowing those dollars to be better utilized for public facilities projects. The completed applications for the programs and projects and activities selected by the City Council for funding will be forwarded to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency for final review of eligibility and approval by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors (Board). The Board is expected to take action on the city's approved programs and projects to be funded as part of the county's One-Year Action Plan for FY 2006/2007 in late spring 2006. Program and project funding is expected to be made available on July 01, 2006. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The city expects to receive an allocation of$213,000 in CDBG funding for FY 2006/2007. Because this program works on a reimbursement basis, the city must allocate adequate general funds to cover the cost of the programs and projects and seek reimbursement for project and program expenditures from the County of Riverside Economic Development Agency. The funds must be used for eligible programs and projects that benefit low and moderate-income persons and areas. No administration costs are provided to manage the program Page 3 of 5 Community Development Block Grant Program FY 2006/2007 Synopsis: Total FY 2005-06 Funding Available: $213,000 Total Funds Requested (Non-Profit/Public Services) $ 76,220 Total Funds Requested for Public Service and Code Enforcement $260,000 TOTAL: $336,220 TOTAL FUNDS RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES $193,000 TOTAL FUNDS RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES $ 20,000 TOTAL: $213,000 FY 2006/2007 CDBG Funding Recommendations Applicant Public Service Programs/Projects Funding Kidzone Youth Museum Provides for one-week hands on day camp at the $0.00 museum for kids 5-11 EXCEED Program Seeks funds for fencing materials for a Community $0.00 Garden for disabled adults _ Retired and Senior Volunteer Provide seniors with opportunities to work with $5,000.00 Program (RSVP) community based organizations Valley Restart Shelter, Inc. Emergency Shelter Bed Acquisition $0.00 Assistance League of Hemacinto Operation School Bell _ $5,000.00 Central County United Way Senior Home Repair Program $0.00 San Jacinto Police Activities PAL Program $10,000.00 League (PAL) Total Public Service Funding: $20,000.00 Public Facilities and Code Enforcement Projects and Programs City of San Jacinto Code Enforcement Program CDBG Target Area $0.00 - To be funded through the General Fund City of San Jacinto Sidewalks installation and replacement Program $193,000.00 for sidewalks, curb gutter and handicap access ramps in the downtown area Total Public Facilities Service Funding: $193,000.00 1 TOTAL FUNDING $213,000.00 Page 4 of 5 Community Development Block Grant Program FY 2005/2006 Total FY 2005-06 Funding Available: $213,188 Public Services $ 31,978 Public Facilities Projects $181,209 TOTAL FUNDS RECOMMENDED (PUBLIC SERVICES) $ 31,978 Total Funds Requested (Public Facilities) $181,209 (Reprogrammed 04-05 Project No. 3.SJ099) $ 1,975 (Reprogrammed 04-05 Project No. 3.SJ106) $ 1,800 TOTAL FUNDS RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES $ 43,209 TOTAL FUNDS RECOMMENDED FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT $136,000 TOTAL FUNDS RECOMMENDED FOR NBRHD CLNUP $ 2,000 TOTAL FY 05-06 & FY 04-05 Funds Available: $216,963 FY 2005/2006 CDBG Funding Recommendations Applicant Public Service Programs/Projects Funding Valley Restart Shelter, Inc. Emergency Shelter Bed Acquisition $2,123.00 Assistance League of Hemacinto Operation School Bell $4,855.00 Central County United Way Senior Home Repair Program _ $10,000.00 San Jacinto Police Activities PAL Program $15,000.00 League (PAL) Total Public Service Funding $31,978.00 Public Facilities and Code Enforcement Projects and Programs City of San Jacinto Neighborhood Cleanup $2,000.00 City of San Jacinto Code Enforcement Program $136,000.00 TOTAL $138,000.00 City of San Jacinto Streets/Sidewalks Replacement Program $43,209.00 Reprogram Funds(FY 2004-05) $3,775.00 TOTAL $46,984.00 Total Non-public Service Funding: $184,984.00 TOTAL FUNDING $216962.00 Page 5 of 5 AGENDA ITEM 5, November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tim Hults, Community Development Director SUBJECT: LAFCO Presentation RECOMMENDATION: Receive the presentation and discuss if Council desires. BACKGROUND: Members of the LAFCO staff will be present to make a brief presentation regarding current LAFCO activities and matters of interest to the City. Among the subjects that may be addressed are LAFCO's present work program including the municipal services review, the City's annexation activity including the Tuls Dairy, the area between San Jacinto Avenue and Vernon Avenue south of the Ramona Expressway, and the area just to the north of the Expressway. It is intended that the presentation will be fairly brief to allow the City Council members time for questions and discussion. BUDGETARY IMPACT: None at this time. Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: t A Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM �a November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Membe s of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engine SUBJECT: Relinquishment of State Highway Route 79 by the State of California within City of San Jacinto RECOMMENDATION: By motion approve Resolution No. , consenting to the relinquishment by the State of California to the City of San Jacinto of State Highway Route 79 within City of San Jacinto. BACKGROUND: On or around March 2005, the Council Transportation Sub-Committee and city staff met with California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), to discuss transportation issues regarding Highway Route 79 within the City limits. One of the main issues of this discussion was the relinquishment of a portion of State Route 79 (right-of-way from curb to property lines), within the City of San Jacinto. Subsequent to this meeting, a follow up letter was forwarded to on March 24, 2005 to Syed Raza of Caltrans, which he replied to on May 9, 2005 (see attached letters). In the May 9, 2005, Mr. Raza expressed concern over the City taking over only a portion of State Route 79, from the curb to the right-of-way line, by the City. The concerns included Caltrans losing control over a portion of the right-of-way containing infrastructure needed to access and properly maintain their equipment within State Route 79 right-of-way. Subsequent discussion ensued between Caltrans and city staff during another meeting. The outcome of this subsequent discussion was memorialized in Mr. Raza's letter dated June 15, 2005, which provides the city with direction on the steps to follow in order to pursue the relinquishment of Highway 79 within the City limits to the city of San Jacinto. Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 Following Council Transportation Sub-Committee direction, staff is proceeding to start the process to request Caltrans to relinquish State Route 79 within the city limits to the City of San Jacinto. The first step in this relinquishment process is to approve the attached resolution. The next step would be to contact our local state legislators to request the sponsoring of a bill authorizing California Transportation Commission to delete the portion of SR-79 within the city limits from the state highway system and transfer the ownership to the city. The final steps include the negotiation of the financial contribution to the city by Caltrans in lieu of bringing the highway to a state of good repair, environmental clearance, and the final relinquishment agreements. JUSTIFICATION: Acquiring control of right-of-way will allow orderly development of the city's projects and will facilitate the city's economic development goals in areas within the existing SR-79 area. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Initial cost is anticipated at $5,000, which includes legal counsel review as well as staff's time to comply with the relinquishment process established by Caltrans. On going maintenance cost of the road is expected at $10,000 per year. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2. Letter to Mr. Raza dated March 24, 2005 3. Caltrans correspondence dated May 9, 2005 and June 15, 2005 Page 2 of 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE RELINQUISHMENT BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO OF PORTIONS OF CERTAIN STATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 79 WITHIN CITY OF SAN JACINTO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, that it consents to the relinquishment by the State of California to the City of San Jacinto of that portion of State Highway Route 79, described on Exhibit "A", between the south city limit of the City of San Jacinto, KP 48.08 (PM 29.881), to the north city limits of the City of San Jacinto KP 49.69 (PM 30.88). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said City Council of the City of San Jacinto waives the statutory 90-day notice of intention to relinquish. ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Council this day of , 2005. Mayor of the City of San Jacinto Attest: City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto , City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, California, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of said City at its meeting held on the day of , 2005, by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Noes: Absent: RVPUB\CAR\702754.I IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Jacinto, California this day of 2005. City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto RVPUB\CAR\702754.I EXHIBIT "A" STATE RELINQUISHMENT MAP RVPUB\CAR\702754.1 Af SAN JACINTO March 24, 2005 Syed Raza, PE Department of Transportation District 8 - MS 1212 464 W. Fourth St., 6`h Floor San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400 Re: Hwy 79 Realignment This letter is a follow up to our recent meeting in the City of San Jacinto discussing the procedures required to realign Hwy 79 within the City of San Jacinto and Caltrans obligation to provide sufficient funds to the City to bring the Highway up to standards prior to such action. We also ask that you advise on the possibility of relinquishing only that part of the right-of-way from curb to property lines. Please note, the City of San Jacinto has not made any determination whether taking over the maintenance of Highway at this point is advisable and may do so upon receipt of your response to my letter. Also, please advise of the possibility for installation of left turn signal phase on San Jacinto and Esplanade Avenue as well as your recommendation for improvements at Idyllwild and State Street. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, ib otlagh City Engineer Copy: Peter Cosentini, City Manager City Engineer's Office 201 East Main Street I San Jacinto, CA 92583 I Ph (909)487-7342 I Fax (909) 654-3728 I www.ci.san-jacinto.ca.us J STATE;Or CAI�F.Mj&.3USINESS.TRANCPORTAnp itk.Ki UOILSTJ1C;AGENCY ARNOLD SCT'1W ARZENEGGER.Ggvornor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 k974) 'OPERATIONS(MS-1212) 464 WEST 4114 STREET,61T FLOOR SAN BERNA.RDTNO.CA 92401 Flex your power! PHONE (909)383-5976 Be energy efficient! FAX (909)383-4318 "i-CY (909)383-6300 May 9, 2005 Mr. Habib Motlagh City Engineer =/L City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street /0, o 1 San Jacinto, CA. 92583 Dear Mr. Motlagh: 'I`O This is in response to your Ietter dated March 24, 2005, regarding several issues on State Route 79 (SR-79) in the City of San Jacinto. Our responses to the three items discussed in your letter are as follows: l . Relinquish the portion of SR-79 from the curb to the right-of-way line to the City: The Department of Transportation (Department) has equipment like signal poles, controller cabinets, luminaries, signs, guard rails, drainage structures and easements located between the curb and right-of-way line that our staff needs to access to operate and maintain the highway. Relinquishing only this portion of right of way will place all these equipment outside State 's right of way. In addition, the Department is responsible for providing a clear recovery area adjacent to the traveled way for the motorists. The Department will have no control over providing the necessary clear recovery area if we relinquish the right of way behind the curb to the City. 2. Signalize the existing intersection of SR-79 and Idyliwild Drive: We have completed a safety investigation for this intersection and find that it does not qualify for funding as a Safety project at this time. The District supports the City's proposal to signalize this intersection. We have discussed the existing non-standard skew angle at this intersection with our headquarters design reviewer and have a verbal concurrence from him that he will approve the mandatory design exception fact sheet prepared for it. 3. Add protected left-turn phase at the intersection of SR-79 and Esplanade Avenue In order for the Department to make a decision regarding adding protected left-turn phase at this location, please provide a study indicating that it is warranted based on either collision history and/or traffic volume. -Ca/trans improves mobility across California" Mr. Habib Motlagh • May 9, 2005 Page 2 If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at (909) 383- 5976. Sincerely, S 'D A Deputy District Director. Operations "Caimans improves mobility across California" STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 OPERATIONS (MS 1201) 464 WEST 4TH STREET,6TH FLOOR SAN BERNARDINO,CA 92401-1400 Flex your power! PHONE (909)383-5979 Be energy efficient! FAX (909)383-4138 TTY (909)383-6300 June 15, 2005 Mr. Habib Motlagh City Engineer 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Mr. Motlagh: This is in reference to our discussion regarding the City of San Jacinto's (City) interest to take over State Route 79 (SR-79) within the City limits. The following is the step-by-step process the California Department of Transportation (Department) will use to relinquish this highway to the City: 1. The City Council passes a resolution supporting the City's desire to take over the route within the City limits. 2. The City contacts a local State legislator (senator of assemblyman) to sponsor a bill authorizing the California Transportation Commission (CTC) to delete the portion of SR-79 within the City limits from the State Highway System and transfer the ownership to the City. The bill must pass both houses and be signed by the Governor to become a law. 3. The Department initiates a capital project to relinquish the highway to the City. 4. The City and the Department enter into negotiations to arrive at a mutually acceptable financial contribution to the City in lieu of bringing the highway to a State of Good Repair. 5. The department prepares the Right of Way relinquishment maps, Relinquishment Agreement Report, Relinquishment Agreement, and processes environmental clearance. 6. The Department submits the Relinquishment Agreement to the City for signature. "Caltrans improves mobility across California" MR. HABIB MOTLAGH Jane 15, 2005 ' Page 2 7. After the Relinquishment Agreement is executed and environmental clearance obtained, the Department adds the relinquishment and fund transfer to the CTC agenda. 8. The CTC votes to delete the highway from the State Highway System and authorizes financial contribution to the City instead of brining it to a State of Good Repair. 9. The relinquishment is recorded at the County Recorder's Office. To expedite the process, the Department works on steps 3 through 5 concurrently with step 2. The entire process typically takes between six and twelve months. The Department looks forward to working with the City on this relinquishment and can assure you of our full support and cooperation. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (909) 383-5976. Sincerely, 4tok SYED RAZA Deputy Director Operations "Caltrans improves mobility across California" +a- • I + Sr e liA4 . .1 �, a4 `t�'Gul .' 44 f ` . • • Y I .i '.t ,, . 1 , k, v -,1 ,.' "w t � r r ,— ti+ r *: ,.k„ , ' , . , ra t,, 1 y. [ ilr . 41i .*?#),i, . ;..,4, ,,, . 4..,.,• •.... , ,..,,,...• . s. ...., : • ,_,.., .. ... ..., .,*•." Ir-'r--21.10h,"....... ii4 , I ., '2. . 4',' ,i ' ,44N. . 1 c y _ r, .a 7 a il\ ' ,• .' ,d .10V. 1. tt .. f r ' ,r a r f 4 -TIT Ir ie.i., 1 _•Ff� '.: , S• r '.' crI �~ Y1 ie "YrR•.t . r- :. ',. • " ` _ - c ' ' � 6rA • w I ,s `'tit~ �•�X' S'�4 P i T' • • Irc tit ...,' om ,1j i 4 _ „ 'v: �.M10' I fl I!'J t : L . l {•,•r j l- r<- "t'rw517 '' • Q ` 1 J .4bI ,-,. I , ' .• . .4,40. . I c:• y,- ak Ji )+, 11 I fC• • -G•y ., ' I , • � '} 4• • 04, ,yam � . 7 � '„•> i �� 1� �x ' I ji .r. r .�; , "''4 ' t. am` . A •, • 4 Atet - Yp • �:I;'y� ', T ', ' �{ti:'d- u '+T-`i^ _ ,,,: •k' tic 7. -k. .Ir d d. ';'r `'•' ';�1.-. - 1 ipCjT _ e • 1 _ r' s •p.i+,�1 +� - 1'1 oak. ;/6; '" - I r 'rrn ,i ;1i ! I. l" �Y I ``�+,1, +1, � 19R,'.•-1. ' 1 .i, :i '• `;+,: 7 • gi , ,1 t1 lil'ill , .. - tills la ,, .. _ �, lli ., ' . 1. ,:>< I' :,r, �t. a r.. �° +: • �, c',' rr'11 II' +ill , it �� ;I. .1N' t is{ . TW r , pii. _ lr ll I. �� � ' 5rfi%1 ., � r' 7� h VI ' � '-_. A,�1. 11 r , .j r ` y ,y. 1 ;y nu ' h � � �KNX . }` }��y£'r T r a T l2 t11.J1 _•C r''"�+�'/'�' •y •_ '•� +'rf r ;£yV,� 1 L Fi1' f Y , fib' :�`' `S + nv, . " ••• a .+ +or l�Y' r T'; • .r.a 7 1r• r -Ali., Z♦ .�".: ~ L� �•.pr+ ..#� A. 110 v.g r t +� •,. •� ., .r' ? , t fir, E j' 'I c ', +ctit AGENDA ITEM 5 3 November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer SUBJECT: West San Jacinto Fire Station Bid Award — Project Number 05-122 RECOMMENDATION: By motion: 1) appropriate $740,300 loan from the City's General fund; 2) appropriate $500,000 from CFD 2003-1 operations; 3) award Public Works Contract to Erickson Hall in the sum of$2,673,000, plus 10% contingency for West San Jacinto Fire Station; 4) authorize the Mayor to execute the public works contract with Erickson Hall; and 5) direct the City Clerk to reject the other bids received. BACKGROUND: On October 6, 2005, Council approved the plans and specification for West San Jacinto Fire Station and authorized the City Clerk to proceed with call for bids for the construction of West San Jacinto Fire Station. Subsequently on November 7, 2005, six bids were received ranging from $2,673,000 to $3,034,000. Erickson Hall was the low responsive/responsible bidder ($2,673,000). References for Erickson Hall Construction were checked by the Tony Finaldi of STK Architecture, Inc., the City's Project Architect (see attached); results of the reference checks did not find anything negative that would prevent the city from awarding the public works contract to Erickson Hall Construction. The one lump sum cost of $2,673,000 for West San Jacinto Fire Station includes construction of a 5,680 sq. ft. fire station, 576 sq. ft. detached storage building, an attached 576 sq. ft. police substation, landscaping, and public works improvements. The building division in conjunction with the project architect will oversee the construction and perform construction management Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 The following is the estimated timeline for completion of the project: • Notice to Proceed December 15, 2005 • Project Completion August 15, 2006 (subject to weather conditions and other none anticipated issues) As discussed in the staff report to Council dated October 6, 2005, final project budget adjustments were anticipated at time of bid award. Based on the low responsive/responsible bidder of $2,673,000, plus approximately 10% contingency for change orders, architectural and the inspection costs, the anticipated project cost is $2,940,300. $1,525,000 is currently available in fiscal year 2005-06 for this project, and an additional $175,000 is available from TASIN grant funding. Therefore, an additional $1,240,300 is needed to offset the project budget shortfall. Staff's recommendations to offset the project budget shortfall include: 1 . Transfer $500,000 from CFD 2003-1 fire operations fund to CFD 2003- 1 capital improvement projects fund 2. Utilize general fund loan in the amount of $740,300, to be repaid with future fire mitigation fees JUSTIFICATION: Implement the construction of the West San Jacinto Fire Station to provide service to the developing western portion of the city. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Current available budget for new fire station $1,525,000 2005-06 TASIN grant funds $ 175,000 Transfer of CFD 2003-1 operations to CIP funds $ 500,000 General fund loan $ 740,300 Project Cost $2,940,300 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Bid Summary 2. Letter from Tony Finaldi, STK Architecture, Inc., dated November 9, 2005 3. Staff report dated October 6, 2005 Page2of2 West San Jacinto Fire Station Project# 05-122 Bid Opening 11/07/2005 @ 2:00 p.m. Company Name Bid Amount Compliance with Pre-Bid Conf Bid Bond Erickson-Hall Construction 2,673,000.00 Yes Yes Tovey/Shultz Const., Inc. 2,709,000.00 Yes Yes Gamut Construction Co., Inc. 2,750,000.00 Yes Yes Howard C. Edmiston Co.. Inc. 2,795,000.00 Yes Yes Murray Builders 2,896,000.00 Yes Yes PW Construction, Inc. 3.034.000.00 Yes Yes STK ARCHITEt:TURE,INC. November 9, 2005 Barry McClellan, City Manager CITY OF SAN JACINTO 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA. 92583 RE: WEST SAN JACINTO FIRE STATION Dear Mr. McClellan, I have reviewed the bids that were opened on November 7, 2005 and I have checked the license and the references of the apparent low bidder, Erickson-Hall Construction Co. I have found nothing negative that would prevent my recommendation of this contractor. Attached please find the bid results, Erickson-Hall qualifications, end state license research document. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, STK Architecture, Inc j41 Tony Finaldi Architect/Project Manager TF/kks Enc's: Bid Results, Qualifications, State License Research Document Cc: Grace Alvarez ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING 42095 7evo Drive,Suite A15,TertIcu.11a,California 92590-9780 Phone:95 /296 9110 Fax;951/296-6079 E-M,.H:stkfRstklnc.corri AGENDA ITEM � I October 6, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Barry McClellan, Interim City Manager SUBJECT: West San Jacinto Fire Station — Project Number 05-122 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion: 1) Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation Monitoring Program; 2) Approve plans and specifications for the fire station; 3) Authorize the City Clerk to proceed with call for bids for construction of West San Jacinto Fire Station. • BACKGROUND: The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed San Jacinto Fire Station were completed on behalf of the City by David Evans and Associates, Inc. The 20-day comment period started on September 7, 2005 and ended on September 27, 2005; no c received by the end of the comment period. Subsequently on September 22, 2005, the Planning Commission at its regular meeting reviewed and adopted the Mitigated ega lve c aration and found the document consistent with the citys general plan. The design of the architectural, engineering, and landscaping plans has been completed and approval of the plans has been obtained. West San Jacinto Fire Station will encompass a 5,680 sq. ft. fire station, 576 sq. ft. detached storage building, and an attached 576 sq. ft. police substation on a 1.62 acre parcel south side of Cottonwood Avenue, between Sanderson and Cawston Avenue. Approvals City Manager: 171kl Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 The project is ready for bid advertisement. The following is the estimated . timeline for completion of the project: • Bid Call October 6, 2005 • Bid Award November 17, 2005 • Notice to Proceed December 15, 2005 • Project Completion August 15, 2006 The current construction budget for fire station construction is $1,563,000.00. The architect's estimate of construction cost is now $2,897,027 (including $80,000 for offsite sewer extension). Final project budget adjustments will have to be made at time of bid award. Council was previously informed that, depending on bid results, more funds would need to be appropriated. Potential funding sources to offset the potential shortfall, based on the architect's opinion, of approximately $1.4 Million include: 1. Utilize 2005-06 TASIN grand funds — $175,000 2. Utilize CFD Fire operations in the amount of $500,000 3. Utilize general fund loan of balance needed to award ($800,000±) to be repaid with future fire mitigation fees JUSTIFICATION: • Implement the construction of the West San Jacinto Fire Station to provide service to the developing western portion of the city. BUDGETARY IMPACT: $1,563,000 is currently budgeted for construction of West San Jacinto Fire Station. However, the project architect probable cost opinion is $2,560,934. Adding a 10% contingency would bring up the project cost to $2,817,027, plus approximately $80,000 for the offsite sewer extension. Additional funding up to $1.4 million will be required at the time of bid award. Funding sources to offset the project shortfall are: 1) 2005-06 TASIN grant funds $175,000; 2) utilize CFD funds allocated in FY 2005-06 for operations at the new fire station - up to $500,000 available (these funds will be available because the station will open in next fiscal year); and 3) loan from the general fund to be repaid with future fire mitigation fees. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Architectural Rendering of West San Jacinto Fire Station • Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM 6-L1 November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer SUBJECT: Mitigation of Nuisance Flows, Hewitt St. between Park Ave and Commonwealth Ave RECOMMENDATION: By motion, 1) approve appropriation of $17,000 loan from the general fund, for construction of cross gutter and spandrel at intersection of Hewitt and Washington, to be paid back with future development agreement funds; 2) approve a re-appropriation in the amount of $35,000 from Main Street storm drain funds (project No. 06-133), to cover 50% cost share of improvements to intersection of Hewitt and Park, as well as Tract 29917 in-tract basin. BACKGROUND: Tract 29917, located at the corner of Hewitt and Park, is nearing completion. Currently, nuisance runoff from this tract flows to the corner of the intersection of Hewitt and Park, where there are no improvements to control the flows. As council knows, the City has recently received many concerns from residents regarding the nuisance water created by this tract, which flows in an unimproved ditch along the east side of Hewitt Street from Park down to Commonwealth. The tract does include a detention basin located near the intersection of Hewitt and Park; however, this basin does not control nuisance runoff because it is a flow-through basin with no dead storage or retention. Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 3 Following meetings between the developer (Osborne Development), the developer's engineer (Blaine Womer), and city staff, the decision was made to revise the approved plans for the tract in order to better control the nuisance runoff. The proposed improvements include: extension of the curb and gutter along Park Ave from its current ending point to the ADA ramp at Hewitt and Park; lowering of the detention basin to create dead storage, which will trap nuisance flows before they can exit the basin, and addition of a catch basin and storm drain pipe on Park Ave to pick up nuisance flows and direct them into the basin. Upon completion of the plan revisions, the developer circulated the plans to local contractors and received bids on the work. The lowest bid came in at approximately $70,000, which was considerably more than either the developer or city staff expected. To that end, and in light of the fact that the tract has been completed in conformance with the conditions of approval, the developer has requested that the city consider splitting the cost of these improvements. Staff believes that the improvements are necessary and in the public interest, and recommends that such a cost sharing arrangement be approved. Additionally, the intersection of Hewitt and Washington is receiving nuisance flows from Tract 29917, which it is ill-equipped to handle. There is currently no way for water to cross this intersection unless a large pond builds up at the southeast corner and then spills over across the crown of the road. The City Engineer's office has prepared a plan for construction of a cross gutter at this intersection to eliminate the pond which develops. A local contractor provided a bid to construct this improvement in the amount of $17,000. The improvements to the basin are a phased solution. During the upcoming fiscal year budget hearing, staff will submit funding request to the City Council for extension of existing drainage facilities along Hewitt Street between Park and Commonwealth Avenue. JUSTIFICATION: In the existing condition, nuisance runoff from Tract 29917 collects in the intersection of Hewitt with Park and Washington, as well as driveways of residents along Hewitt. This creates an undesirable and potentially unsafe situation. The developer has worked with the City to design improvements which go above and beyond the requirements placed upon the project in order to mitigate the nuisance runoff. In the interest of public health and safety, the City Engineer recommends funding of the improvements both within Tract 29917 and at the intersection of Hewitt and Washington. Page 2 of 3 BUDGETARY IMPACT: There are two appropriations requested: 1) $17,000 loan from the general fund, for construction of cross gutter and spandrel at intersection of Hewitt and Washington, to be paid back with future development agreement funds; and 2) $35,000 re-appropriation from Main Street storm drain funds (project No. 06- 133), to cover 50% cost share of improvements to intersection of Hewitt and Park, as well as Tract 29917 in-tract basin for the improvements within Tract 29917 (50% share with developer). Main Street storm drain improvements (project No. 06-133), currently has a balance of $400,000 for extension of storm drain along Main Street. This project will more than likely be funded jointly by the city and a developer. Therefore, the total city's obligation will be less than the total allocation in this budget. The $17,000 loan from the general fund should be repaid with future development agreement funds. However, the $35,000 allocation is a re- appropriation of drainage expenditures (project # 06-133). ATTACHMENTS: None Page 3 of 3 AGENDA ITEM 6.1 November 17, 2005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk SUBJECT: Committee and/or Agency Agendas RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: Information per Council's request. JUSTIFICATION: None BUDGETARY IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Library— RCTC — RTA - VEDC WROG — Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:00 a.m. Wednesday, November 9, 2005 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Items not listed on the agenda) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 12, 2005 6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 9, 2005 Page 2 7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 7A. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended September 30, 2005. 7B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the first quarter ended September 30, 2005. 7C. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the lnterfund Loan Activity Report for the month ended September 30, 2005. 7D. 2005 TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Allocate Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds as presented in the Technical Advisory Committee funding recommendations listing; and, 2) Submit proposed TE funding recommendations to Caltrans Headquarters. 7E. DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT DATABASE Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 9, 2005 Page 3 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the development and implementation of a Project Management Database to be funded by Local Transportation Funds; and, 2) Issue a Request for Proposal for the development and implementation of a Project Management Database. 7F. TUMF REGIONAL ARTERIAL PRIORITY PROJECT RECOMMENDATION FOR THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1 ) Approve the City of Riverside's Van Buren Boulevard widening project from Andrew to Garfield Streets as eligible for TUMF Regional funding pursuant to the Commission's call for projects; and, 2) Program $905,000 in TUMF Regional funds for construction of the project in FY 2006 plus up to 10% in construction contingency costs ($90,500) pursuant to the TUMF Nexus Study. 7G. EXPANSION OF COMMUTESMART.INFO TRAFFIC MAP Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file this report on the real time traffic information map expansion project as hosted on the regional rideshare website, www.CommuteSmart.info. 7H. FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AMENDMENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY - TRANSIT CENTERS Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 9, 2005 Page 4 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Amend the FY 2005-06 Short Range Transit Plan for the Riverside Transit Agency to include the Program of Projects for the continued development of transit centers located in Riverside County; 2) Direct staff to program funding in the amount of $1,963,097 in Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees administered through Western Riverside Council of Governments and $96,140 in Federal Transit Administration's Section 5309 funds; and, 3) Include the projects in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program. 71. FISCAL YEAR 2006-2010 MEASURE "A" FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITIES OF BEAUMONT AND INDIO Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 2006-10 Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the Cities of Beaumont and Indio. 7J. AMENDMENT TO MEASURE "A" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITIES OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS AND PALM SPRINGS Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the amendment to the: 1) FY 2005 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Desert Hot Springs; and, 2) FY 2006 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Palm Springs. 7K. FUND TRANSFER AGREEMENT NO. 06-45-550 FOR OPERATION OF A FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Overview Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 9, 2005 Page 5 This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the Fund Transfer Agreement No. 06-45-550 with the State of California Department of Transportation for the Riverside County Freeway Service Patrol program in the amount of $1 ,175,933 in State funding for FY 2005-06; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission. 7L. REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF BANNING TO REPROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FUNDS Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the request from the City of Banning to reprogram FY 2004-05 SB 821 funds. 7M. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. 7N. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1 ) Approve the following change in state bill position: SB 1024 (Perata D-Oakland) - Change from OPPOSE to SUPPORT WITH AMENDMENTS; and, 2) Receive and file the State and Federal Legislative Update as an information item. 8. PRESENTATION - INLAND EMPIRE TRANSPORTATION COALITION Overview This item is for the Commission to receive a presentation on the Inland Empire Transportation Coalition from Bob Wolf. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 9, 2005 Page 6 9. 2009 MEASURE "A" WESTERN COUNTY HIGHWAY PROGRAM TEN-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND NEGOTIATION OF BECHTEL INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRACT AMENDMENT Overview This item is for the Commission to authorize staff to negotiate a contract amendment to Agreement No. 05-31-561 with Bechtel Infrastructure to provide a scope, schedule and cost to support the Commission's effort to develop a 2009 Measure "A" Western County Highway Ten-Year Strategic Plan including: a) An assessment on the status and issues of completing delivery of the Western County Highway Program for the 1989 Measure "A"; and, b) An objective based assessment of the Western County 2009 Measure "A" Highway Program (including the Mid County Parkway) as generally described in the agenda item. 10. STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ADVISOR REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the release of a request for qualifications (RFQ) and request for proposals (RFP), if necessary, for Strategic Partnership Advisor services. 11. MID COUNTY PARKWAY PROJECT — APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 06-72-555 WITH JACOBS CIVIL INC. TO REVISE THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PROJECT REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 9, 2005 Page 7 1 ) Approve Agreement No. 06-72-555, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 04-31-018 to Jacobs Civil Inc. for incorporation of the three new alternatives identified during the Value Analysis Study process for the Mid County Parkway (MCP) project for an amount of $4,845,385; 2) Authorize the use of $4,845,385 of commercial paper until such time as additional TUMF funding is approved for the MCP project, at which time the TUMF funding will replace commercial paper to the extent that it is available; and, 3) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file the draft Commuter Rail Feasibility Final Report; and, 2) Advance Scenario 3 (Perris Valley Line/Commuter/San Jacinto) and Scenario 7 (I-215/Commuter/Temecula) as optimal commuter rail routes warranting future study for inclusion in the next RTP update. 13. PRESENTATION — TUMF UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to receive a TUMF Update from Rick Bishop, WRCOG Executive Director. 14. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 15. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. Boards/Committees/Conferences • 91 Toll Road Advisory Committee Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 9, 2005 Page 8 • Major Investment Study (MIS) Committee • Mobile Source Review Committee (MSRC) • Regional Transportation Agencies Coalition (RTAC) • SCAG Regional Council • SCAG Transportation and Communications Committee • Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) 16. CLOSED SESSION ITEM A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 54956.9 Case Nos. RIC 386647 and C-05-01525 JSW B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Government Code Section 54956.9 C. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Item APN Property Owners► 571-170-002 1 571-270-006 Cordova Property 571-320-008 580-080-012 580-090-001 580-090-005 580-090-006 581-100-066 2 581-130-001 Jalem Productions 581-130-002 581-140-001 581-140-003 581-140-005 581-140-008 17. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, December 14, 2005, Board Room, County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. - - I RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DUE TO LACK OF SUBSTANTIVE AGENDA ITEMS, THE COMMISSION'S EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 9T" , AT 8:00 A.M. IS CANCELLED. Riverside Transit Agency, Riverside, CA Page 1 of 3 Home(Site Mat RIDING PROGRAMS FARES& MARKETING ABO whrowst.M Thom"Agdoory THE BUS &EVENTS PASSES &MEDIA RTA Site Search y a� Quick Links «Previous Page Hemp>About_The.RTA>Boa! Route Schedules Emplpym.e..nt Rules And Policies Board Agenda 12005 Meetings Meeting No.2005-09A(October 27,2005 1 2:00 p.m.11825 Third Street I Riverside,CA Transportation NOW PLEASE NOTE: Trip Planner Passes$TIcicets Online Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to partic Transit Links this meeting should contact the RTA Clerk of the Board,telephone number(951)565-5044, than two business days prior to the meeting to enable RTA to make reasonable arrangemer assure accessibility to this meeting. Contact Information The Board Chairman kindly requests that cell phones be turned off during the meeting. ►Email Us I.Comments Form NOTE:These documents are in PDF format.You must have a recent version of the Acrobs software installed on your computer.Get the Acrobat.Reader Kfftware. Customer Information Center: 1-800-800-7821 or (951)565-5002 BOARD AGENDA MEETING-10/27/05 Meeting 1825 Third Street AGENDA P.O.Box 59968 Riverside,CA 92517-1968 (951)565-5000 ITEM I RECOMMENDATION 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.SELF-INTRODUCTIONS 3.FLAG SALUTE 4.PUBLIC COMMENTS—NON-AGENDA ITEMS RECEIVE COMMENTS Members of the public may address the Board regarding any item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board:however,no action may be taken on off-agenda items unless authc law.Comments shall be limited to matters not listed on the agenda. Members of the public r comment on any matter listed on the agenda at the time that the Board considers that matte person's presentation is limited to a maximum of three(3)minutes 5.COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS(CNG)RIBBON CUTTING CEREMONY http://www.riversidetransit.com/BoardAgendas/ba 05-09A.html 11/9/2005 Riverside Transit Agency, Riverside, CA Page 2 of 3 6.UPDATE FROM LEGISLATIVE LOBBYIST,DAVID TURCH RECEIVE UPDATE Any Person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to partic this meeting should contact the RTA Clerk of the Board.telephone number(951)565-5044, than two business days prior to this meeting to enable RTA to make reasonable arrangemer assure accessibility to this meeting. 7.PRESENTATIONS:-RETIREMENT PLAQUE TO PREVIOUS COACH OPERATOR,JOt WHITE-TROPHY TO COACH OPERATOR,RON DICKEY,FOR WINNING REGIONAL Bt ROADEO AND FOR HIS PARTICIPATION IN INTERNATIONAL BUS ROADEO-CERTIFI( OF APPRECIATION TO COACH OPERATORS.ART GUERRERO,LISA COLORES.ORLI GUTIERREZ,AND LOLO REVELES FOR ASSISTING IN FUNDRAISING FOR HURRICAI\ KATRINA VICTIMS MAKE PRESENTATIONS 8.APPROVALQF MINUTES-SEPTEMBER 22.2005,BOARD MEETING(P.5)APPROI 9.CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the Consent Calendar will be approved by one motion and there will be no disc( individual items unless a Board member or member of the public requests a specific item be from the calendar for separate discussion A.RTA Financial Profile-September 2005(P. 12)RECEIVE AND FILE B.Ridership Report-September 2005(P.24)RECEIVE AND FILE C.Personnel Report-September 2005(P.29)RECEIVE AND FILE D.Transportation Center Report-September 2005(P.34)RECEIVE AND FILE E.On-Time Performance Report-September 2005(P.39)RECEIVE AND FILE F.Boa-rd Budget and Finance Committee Meeting-9/7/05 Minutes(P.45)RECEIVE AN[ G.Tra...ns_.portation NOW Meeting Attendees--July-September 2005(P.48)RECEIVE At, H.Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE)Policy Statement(P.51)RECEIVE AND Fl I.Agency..C.redit C.arct_Stetement.forSeptember(P.52)RECEIVE AND FILE J.Cash..Flow Protections(P.54)RECEIVE AND FILE Board Budget and Finance Committee Reviewed and Recommended(10/12/05 Meeting) K.Quarterly Performance Standards Report-Period Ending 9/30/05(P.55)RECEIVE AI` L.Fareb.Qx_Reggvery__Ratiq RepQ_rs-Period Ending 9/30/05(P.57)RECEIVE AND FILE M..Investment_ReoQ1 Period Ending 9/30/05(P.70)RECEIVE AND FILE N.Authorization to Award aContract To Creative Bus Sales.Inc.,for Thirty-one(31)Replac and Three(3)Expansion Paratransit Vehicles:Twelve(12)of which are Cal Trans Type(II), Passenger Paratransit Vans and Twenty-two(22)Cal Trans Type(IV),Accessible Minivans APPROVE Board Budget and Finance Committee Reviewed and Recommended(10/12/05 Meeting) http://www.riversidetransit.com/BoardAgendas/ba 05-09A.html 11/9/2005 Riverside Transit Agency, Riverside, CA Page 3 of 3 0.Authorization to Award a Contract to Mercury Technology Group jMTG)to Provide Oracl, Managed Service Support/Hosting Services for Oracle E-Business Suite.Databases,and R Servers(P.74)APPROVE Board Budget and Finance Committee Reviewed and Recommended(10/12/05 Meeting) P.Discuss Modifying the Agency's Policy for Transferring Title of Retired Paratransit Vehicle Include Service Trucks(P.77)APPROVE 10.ANNUAL REPORT FOR PUBLIC AGENCIES SELF-INSURED FOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS(P.81)RECEIVE AND FILE Board Budget and Finance Committees Reviewed and Recommended(10/12/05 Meeting) 11.CAPITAL PROJEQT.U.PDATE(P.84)RECEIVE AND FILE Board Budget and Finance Committee Reviewed and Recommended(10/12/05 Meeting) 12.FUEL PRICE ANALYSIS(P.90)REVIEW/DISCUSS Board Budget and Finance Committee Reviewed and Recommended(10/12/05 Meeting) 13.BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS AND REMARKS 14.ANNOUNCEMENTS 15.NEXT MEETING Regular Meeting of the RTA Board of Directors Thursday,November 17,2005 2:00 p.m. RTA Conference Room 1825 Third Street Riverside,CA 92507-3484 16.CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT 54956.9(c) 17.ADJOURNMENT Riding The Bus I Programs&Events(Fares&Passes I Marketing&Media I About R Copyright©1998-2005 by the Riverside Transit Agency.All rights reserved. Site Designed and Maintained by Zhapoo Studios. http://www.riversidetransit.com/BoardAgendas/ba 05-09A.html 11/9/2005 VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION HEMET • SAN JACINTO • RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Wednesday, November 2, 2005, 7:45 a.m. Riverside County, Workforce Development Center 1075 N State Street, Hemet, CA AGENDA CALL TO ORDER & INTRODUCTIONS: Chair Gosch APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES ACTION ITEMS 1. Approval of budget for Bus Tour for Dec. 7, 2005 (5 minutes) Eric 2. Nominating Committee — approval of Nominations & Ballot Eric 3. Approval of 2006 VEDC Budget DISCUSSION EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT (5 minutes) Diane CORRESPONDENCE (1 minute) Secretary Christie FINANCIAL REPORT (2 minutes) Treasurer Torres COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. E2B2(5 minutes) Phil Pendley 2. Marketing (3 minutes) Lori Van Arsdale 3. Membership (2 minutes) Diane 4. Strategic Planning (5 minutes) Patricia Williams OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS IMPORTANT 4 Next meeting: Wednesday, December 7, 2005 at 2:15 p.m., Soboba Springs Country Club, 1020 Soboba Road, San Jacinto, CA (after bus tour lunch meeting) VERY IMPORTANT MEETING, ELECTION OF OFFICERS WILL BE HELD ADJOURNMENT Valley Economic Development Corporation 800 E. Florida Ave., Ste A, Hemet,CA 92543 951.652.7688/951.652.7618(fax)/www.vedc.com WRCOG Western Riverside Council Of Governments Executive Committee AGENDA Monday, November 7, 2005 2:00 p.m. County of Riverside Administrative Center 1st Floor, Board Room 1. CALL TO ORDER (Chair Jeff Miller) 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time members of the public can address the Executive Committee regarding any items with the subject matter jurisdiction of the Committee that are not separately listed on this agenda. Members of the public will have an opportunity to speak on agendized items at the time the item is called for discussion. No action may be taken on items not listed on the agenda unless authorized by law. Whenever possible,lengthy testimony should be presented to the Committee in writing and only pertinent points presented orally. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and may be enacted by one motion. Prior to the motion to consider any action by the Agency,any public comments on any of the Consent Items will be heard. There will be no separate action unless members of the Agency request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar. A. Minutes from the October 3, 2005 Executive Committee meeting are available for consideration. (Minutes will be provided under separate cover) Requested Action: 1. Approve minutes. B. Solid Waste Program Activities Update Barbara Spoonhour P. 1 Requested Action: 1. Receive and file. C. Legislative Report Danielle Maxson P.3 Requested Actions: 1. Receive and file. 2. Endorse The Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act of 2006, Jessica's Law. D. Financial Report for October 2005 Scott Higginbotham P. 19 Requested Action: 1. Receive and file. E. Amendment to terminate Administrative/ Rick Bishop P.23 Personnel Services Contract between WRCOG and RCA Requested Action: 1. Authorize Executive Committee Chair to execute Amendment to waive six-month termination clause for WRCOG provision of AdministrativelPersonnel Services Agreement to the Regional Conservation Authority. F. Outreach for Counties Proposed Rick Bishop P.27 Anti-graffiti Ordinance Requested Action: 1. Receive and file. G. Clean Cities Program Activities Update Barbara Spoonhour P.35 Requested Action: 1. Receive and file. 6. REPORTS/DISCUSSION A. Southern California Association Mark Pisano P.37 Of Governments 40th Anniversary Requested Action: 1. Receive report. B. Choice Works Dialogue Report Heidi Gantwerk P.39 Requested Action: 1. Receive report. C. Report from League of California Cities Dave Willmon P. 137 Regional Representative Requested Action: 1. Receive report. D. TUMF Program Activities Update Ruthanne Taylor Berger P. 139 Requested Actions: 1. Receive report. 2. Authorize the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the County of Riverside for the Limonite Ave. widening project between Hamner Ave. and Etiwanda Ave. from two to four lanes. 3. Authorize the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the County of Riverside for the Limonite Ave. widening project between Etiwanda Ave. and Van Buren Blvd. from two to four lanes. 4. Authorize the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the County of Riverside for the Newport Rd. 1-215 Interchange modifications. 5. Authorize the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the County of Riverside for the Bundy Canyon/Scott Rd. widening project between 1-15 and 1-215 from two to four lanes. 6. Authorize the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the County of Riverside for the Wood Rd. widening project between Cajalco Rd. and Krameria Ave. from two to four lanes. 7. Approve the amended TIP for the Northwest Zone and obligate the projects funding. 8. Approve the amended RTA TIP and obligate the projects funding. 9. Direct staff to seek input and recommendations from WRCOG TAC and TUMF Policy Committee regarding the 2-year Comprehensive Update in November and return to Executive Committee in December with recommendations on how to proceed. E. Draft TUMF June 2005 Annual Review Ruthanne Taylor Berger P.253 for the Northwest Zone Requested Action: 1. Approve the staff recommended adjustments to the Northwest Zone 2005 TUMF 5-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). 7. ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS Members Members are invited to suggest additional items to be brought forward for discussion at future Executive Committee meetings. 8. GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS MemberslGuests Members/Guests are invited to announce items/activities which may be of general interest to the Executive Committee. 9. NEXT MEETING: The next Executive Committee is scheduled for December 5,2005, 2:00 p.m.,County Administrative Center, 1"Floor,Board Room. 10. ADJOURNMENT