HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2473 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 2473
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY OF SAN JACINTO
LAND SECURED FINANCING POLICY
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 53312.7 of the California Government
Code, the City of San Jacinto ("City") is required to consider and adopt certain
goals and policies concerning the use of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities
District Act of 1982 (the "Act') prior to initiating proceedings to establish a district
pursuant to the Act; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 53312.7 of the California Government
Code, the City Council ("City Council") of the City has previously considered and
adopted such goals and policies; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now wishes to consider and adopt certain
amendments to said goals and policies; and
�.. WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED determined and ordered by the
City Council of the City of San Jacinto:
SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council hereby finds and
determines that the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct and are
hereby incorporated into this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. Section I, Item 1, Paragraph # 2
of the City of San Jacinto Land Secured Financing Policy, dated April, 2002 is
hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
2 The use of community facilities districts or assessment districts
will be permitted to finance public facilities whose useful life will
be equal to or greater than the term of the bonds, including fees
associated with such public facilities. Community facilities or
assessment districts will also be permitted to finance the
maintenance and operation of public facilities being financed by
community facilities district or assessment district. Facilities that
are, upon completion, owned, operated or maintained by public
agencies shall be considered public facilities. Limited
Page 1 of 4
exceptions will be made for facilities to be owned, operated or
maintained by private utilities. However, community facilities
districts or assessment districts may also be permitted to
finance: (i) the costs of services to be provided by the City for
the additional police protection services, including, but not
limited to, criminal justice services and additional fire protection
and suppression services that are necessary to meet increased
demands placed upon the City as a result of development; (ii)
the costs of maintenance of streets, roads and highways within
the City's boundaries; and (iii) the costs of maintenance of
parks, parkways and open space.
a. The City is concerned that the proposed project that is to be
financed is not premature for the area in which it is to be
located. The proposed project must be consistent with the
City's general plan.
Projects that require: (i) a General Plan amendment (ii) a
change of zone that increases the density or intensity of land
use; (iii) a specific plan, (iv) a specific plan amendment to
increase density or intensity of land use will require an
evaluation by the City as to whether the proposed project is
premature
SECTION 3. Adoption of Amendments_ Section 11, Item 2 of the City of
San Jacinto Land Secured Financing Policy, dated April, 2002 is hereby
amended by adding the following immediately following the second paragraph of
said section:
For annexations to existing districts, a deposit in an amount not
less than $11 ,500 for annexation into a community facilities district
and a deposit in an amount not less than $25,900 for annexation
into an assessment district shall be attached to the completed
application submitted; such deposit to be determined by the
Finance Director.
In order to adjust for the unique circumstances surrounding the
formation and subsequent annexations into the City's proposed fire
and police fire protection services community service district (the
"CFD") and 1892 Act road maintenance assessment district (the
"1982 District"), the deposit amounts for formation of such districts
and annexation into such districts shall be as follows:
Petitioning Parties. For those landowners petitioning for initial
inclusion (individually, a "Petitioning Party"), the Petitioning Party
NOW will be required to pay the full deposit amount for the formation of
Page 2 of 4
the CFD ($25,000) and, as applicable, the 1982 District ($15,000).
ti.. Once the number of such Petitioning Parties who will actually joins
the applicable district(s) is determined (as of the time of the final
vote required by the applicant(s)), the estimated cost of joining the
CFD and, as applicable, 1982 District (the "Estimated Cost of
Joining the CFD" or "Estimated Cost of Joining 1982 District"), as
set forth below, will be divided by that number of developers
actually joining, in order to arrive at a quotient (the "Quotient"). The
difference between the previously paid deposit and the Quotient will
be refunded to each landowner following the last required vote on
formation. The Total Estimated Cost is the sum of legal, consultant
and administrative staff time and costs, and is set at $56,000 for the
police and fire CFD and $51,400 for the 1982 District. Therefore,
based on those figures, the calculation would be as follows:
CFD Amount: Estimated Cost of Joining CFD
Number of Landowners Joining
1982 District Amount: Estimated Cost of Joining 1982 District
Number of Landowner Joining
Non-Petitioning Parties. For those landowners who are not
petitioning for inclusion in the initial formation (individually, a "Non-
Petitioning Party"), the amount that must be paid will be based on
the costs actually incurred by the City in excess of the Estimated
Cost of Joining the CFD and, as applicable, the 1982 District,
multiplied by a quotient that represents the number of lots within a
particular annexing project divided by the buildout number currently
within the City's development process, currently estimated to be
7,300. Based on that assumed buildout number, the calculation
would be as follows, depending on which of the two districts, or
both, a landowner annexes into:
CFD Amount= ((Actual Costs to City of Formation of
CFD — Estimated Cost of Joining CFD)
X N'/7,300) + CFD Annexation Cost
Estimate
1982 District Amount= ((Actual Costs to City of Formation of
1082 District - Estimated Cost of
Joining 1982 District) X N17,300) + 1982
District Annexation Cost Estimate3
' N =Number of lots within a particular annexing project.
%ftw 'CFD Annexation Cost Estimate is SI 1,500.
942 District Annexatiun Estimate is$25,900.
Page 3 of 4
4, In the event the actual costs to the City of annexing the project are
less than the CFD Annexation Cost Estimate component or 1982
District Annexation Cost Estimate, such amount shall be refunded
to the applicant following the final vote required for such
annexation.
SECTION 3. Remaininq Provisions. Except as specifically amended by
this Resolution, all other provisions of the City of San Jacinto Land Secured
Financing Policy, dated April, 2002 shall remain in full force and effect.
APPROVED and ADOPTED, this 2nd day of October, 2003, by the
following vote:
Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Conner, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres
Nays: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
City of San Jacinto
b im Ayre ayor
[ATTEST:
IT
orothy Ch V
inard, City Clerk
Page 4of4