HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 2798-B �-- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 2798-B
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33420, A 200
RESIDENTIAL LOT, 1 RETENTION BASIN LOT, 1 PARK LOT, AND 1
COMMERCIAL LOT SUBDIVISION, LOCATED SOUTH OF
COTTONWOOD AVENUE BETWEEN CAWSTON AVENUE AND
SANDERSON AVENUE: FILE NO. TR 33420.
WHEREAS, Crossroads Properties filed an application on March 9, 2005, for
Tentative Tract Map No. 33420 to subdivide 73.74 gross acres into 200 single-family
lots, 1 retention basin lot, 1 park lot, and 1 commercial lot located south of Cottonwood
Avenue between Cawston Avenue and Sanderson Avenue, and more particularly
described in Exhibit 'B" ("Legal Description") of the Planning Commission staff report;
WHEREAS, the property affected by the Application is zoned R-1 (Single Family
Residential) with the approval of General Plan Amendment 3-05 and Zone Change 4-
05;
WHEREAS, the Application was reviewed, studied, and found to comply with the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") as more fully described below;
WHEREAS, on October 20, 2005, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto
("City Council') conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application, at which
time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Application were heard and the
Application was comprehensively reviewed; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the City Council, all written
and oral evidence presented to the City Council, and the findings set forth in this
Resolution, the City Council approves Tentative Tract Map No. 33420, subject to
the conditions of approval in Exhibit "D".
SECTION 2. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66410 et
sec., based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral
evidence presented to the City Council, the City Council finds as follows:
�'' Page 1 of 4