HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - 3949Resolution No. 3949
Page 1 of 8
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 3949
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND A
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT, CERTIFYING THE GENERAL PLAN
UPDATE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(SCH #2020120312), AND APPROVING THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto (the “City”) proposes the Envision San Jacinto
– General Plan 2040 Project (the “General Plan Update” or “Project”), a comprehensive
update to the City’s existing General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Project sets the overarching policy document that guides land use,
housing, transportation, open space, public safety, community services, and other policy
decisions throughout the City and the Sphere of Influence; and
WHEREAS, the City will implement the General Plan Update by requiring
development, infrastructure improvements, and other projects to be consistent with its
policies, and by implementing the actions included in the Project; and
WHEREAS, prior to the development of the Project, the City conducted extensive
public outreach including direct mailing to over 15,000 mailboxes within the City limits;
hosted three (3) public workshops in February and March 2019, hosted two (2) popup
workshops at the City sponsored Kool A ugust Nights Concert Series in August 2019,
conducted a 10 month online survey, hosted two (2) stakeholder focus group sessions in
August 2019, and held two public meetings for the Planning Commission and City Council
in September and October 2020 respectively to receive feedback on a draft land use
policy map; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, and section
15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), the City
of San Jacinto is the lead agency for the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City
determined that a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared
in order to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts that could potentially result
from the adoption and implementation of the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines section 15082, on
December 17, 2020, the City sent to the Office of Planning and Research and each
responsible and trustee agency a Notice of Preparation (“NOP”) stating that an
Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number #2020120312 would be
prepared; and
DocuSign Envelope ID: BCC13C27-71BE-4BE6-B03E-9202B943AAD3
Resolution No. 3949
Page 2 of 8
WHEREAS, ten (10) comment letters were received in response to the NOP; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.9 and State CEQA
Guidelines sections 15082(c) and 15083, the City held a duly noticed Scoping Meeting
on January 6, 2021, to solicit comments on the scope of the environmental review of the
proposed Project, however, no comments were received during the Scoping Meeting; and
WHEREAS, a Draft Programmatic EIR (“Draft EIR”) was prepared, incorporating
comments received in response to the NOP; and
WHEREAS, the Draft EIR concluded that the proposed Project would result in
significant and unavoidable impacts relating to: agricultural resources, air quality,
biological resources, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines section 15085, a Notice
of Completion was prepared and filed with the Office of Planning and Research on July
28, 2022; and
WHEREAS, as required by State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(a), the City
provided Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR to the public at the same time that the City
sent Notice of Completion to the Office of Planning and Research, on July 28, 2022; and
WHEREAS, during the public comment period, copies of the Draft EIR and
technical appendices were available for review and inspection at City Hall, on the City’s
website, and published in the Press Enterprise; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(e), the Draft EIR
was circulated for at least a 45-day public review and comment period from December
31, 2411 to September 12, 2022; and
WHEREAS, during the public review and comment period, the City consulted with
and requested comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory
agencies, and others pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15086; and
WHEREAS, the City received five (5) written comment letters on the Draft EIR;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21092.5, the City
provided copies of its responses to commenting public agencies at least ten (10) days
prior to the City’s consideration of the Final EIR on October 14, 2022; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2022, the City released the Final EIR (“Final EIR”),
which consists of the Draft EIR, all technical appendices prepared in support of the Draft
EIR, all written comment letters received on the Draft EIR, written responses to all written
comment letters received on the Draft EIR, and errata to the Draft EIR and technical
appendices; and
DocuSign Envelope ID: BCC13C27-71BE-4BE6-B03E-9202B943AAD3
Resolution No. 3949
Page 3 of 8
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted the public
hearing to consider the Draft EIR for the Project and solicited comments on the document.
After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, and the City’s consultant team,
the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-02 by a
unanimous (5-0) vote, recommending that the City Council certify the EIR for the Project;
and
WHEREAS, the “EIR” consists of the Final EIR and its attachments and
appendices, as well as the Draft EIR and its attachments and appendices (as modified by
the Final EIR); and
WHEREAS , all potentially significant adverse environmental impacts were
sufficiently analyzed in the EIR; and
WHEREAS, as contained herein, the City has endeavored in good faith to set forth
the basis for its decision on the Project; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements of the Public Resources Code and the State
CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City in connection with the preparation of
the EIR which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental
effects of the Project have been adequately evaluated; and
WHEREAS, the EIR prepared in connection with the Project sufficiently analyzes
the Project’s potentially significant environmental impacts and the EIR analyzes a range
of feasible alternatives capable of reducing th ese effects to an even lesser level of
significance; and
WHEREAS, the City has made certain findings of fact, as set forth in Exhibit “A”
to this Resolution, attached hereto and incorporated herein, based upon the oral and
written evidence presented to it as a whole and the entirety of the administrative record
for the Project, which are incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the City finds that environmental impacts that are identified in the EIR
as less than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section II of Exhibit
“A”; and
WHEREAS, the City finds that there are no environmental impacts that are
identified in the EIR that are less than significant with incorporation of mitigation measures
as described in Section III of Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, the City finds that even with the incorporation of all feasible mitigation
measures, the environmental impacts that are identified in the EIR that are significant and
unavoidable are described in Section IV of Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, the cumulative impacts of the Project identified in the EIR and set forth
herein, are described in Section V of Exhibit “A”; and
DocuSign Envelope ID: BCC13C27-71BE-4BE6-B03E-9202B943AAD3
Resolution No. 3949
Page 4 of 8
WHEREAS, the potential significant irreversible environmental changes that would
result from the proposed Project identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described
in Section VI of Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, the existence of any growth-inducing impacts resulting from the
proposed Project identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described in Section VII
of Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, alternatives to the proposed Project that might further reduce the
already less than significant environmental impacts are described in Section VIII of
Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, because the EIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts, the
City explains its reasoning for recommending the adoption of the Project despite those
impacts in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, as set forth in Section IX of
Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, prior to taking action, the City Council has heard, been presented with,
reviewed and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record,
including but not limited to the EIR, and all oral and written evidence presented to it during
all meetings and hearings; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the EIR reflects the independent judgment of
the City and is deemed adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the
Project; and
WHEREAS, no comments made in the public hearings conducted by the Planning
Commission and City Council and no additional information submitted to the City have
produced substantial new information requiring recirculation of the EIR or additional
environmental review of the Project under Public Resources Code section 21092.1 and
State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, the City Council conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on this Resolution, at which time all persons wishing to testify were heard
and the Project was fully considered; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by
reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds that it has been presented with the EIR
which it has reviewed and considered, and further finds that the EIR is an accurate and
objective statement that has been completed in full compliance with CEQA and the State
DocuSign Envelope ID: BCC13C27-71BE-4BE6-B03E-9202B943AAD3
Resolution No. 3949
Page 5 of 8
CEQA Guidelines. The City Council finds that the EIR reflects the independent judgment
and analysis of the City. The City Council declares that no evidence of new significant
impacts or any new information of “substantial importance” as defined by State CEQA
Guidelines section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Draft
EIR that would require recirculation. Therefore, the City Council certifies the EIR based
on the entirety of the record of proceedings.
SECTION 3. The City Council adopts the “CEQA Findings of Fact” where were
prepared in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines sections 15091 and which are
attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 4. Based upon the entire record before it, including the EIR, Findings of
Fact, and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council approves the proposed
Project.
SECTION 5. The documents and materials that constitute the record of
proceedings on which this Resolution has been based are located a t City Hall, 595 S.
San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583. The custodian for these records is Travis
Randel. This information is provided pursuant to Public Resources Code section
21081.6.
SECTION 6. The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare and file a Notice of
Determination with the County Clerk of the County of Riverside within five working days
of the execution of this Resolution and approval of the Project and with the Office of
Planning and Research.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November 2022, by the
following vote:
AYES: Heath, Ledezma, Ayala, Ruiz
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Hawkins
ABSTAIN: None
DocuSign Envelope ID: BCC13C27-71BE-4BE6-B03E-9202B943AAD3
Resolution No. 3949
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
_____________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP
__________________________________
Craig Hayes, Deputy City Attorney
DocuSign Envelope ID: BCC13C27-71BE-4BE6-B03E-9202B943AAD3
Resolution No. 3949
Page 7 of 8
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO)
CERTIFICATION
I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, CA, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 3949 was passed, approved, and adopted at the Regular
Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council held on the 15 th day of November, 2022.
AYES: Heath, Ledezma, Ayala, Ruiz
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Hawkins
ABSTAIN: None
WITNESS MY HAND AND THE SEAL on this 15th day of November 2022.
______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
DocuSign Envelope ID: BCC13C27-71BE-4BE6-B03E-9202B943AAD3
Resolution No. 3949
Page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT “A”
CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT
DocuSign Envelope ID: BCC13C27-71BE-4BE6-B03E-9202B943AAD3
-1-
EXHIBIT A
CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT
The California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)
(“CEQA”) requires that public agencies shall not approve or carry out a project for which an
environmental impact report (“EIR”) has been certified that identifies one or more significant
adverse environmental effects of a project unless the public agency makes one or more written
Findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale
for each Finding (State CEQA Guidelines [Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.], § 15091).
This document presents the CEQA Findings of Fact made by the City of San Jacinto, in its capacity
as the CEQA lead agency, regarding the Envision San Jacinto – General Plan 2040 (“General
Plan”), evaluated in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (“Draft EIR”) and Final
Environmental Impact Report (“Final EIR”) for the Project.
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
Public Resources Code section 21002 states that “public agencies should not approve
projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available
which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.]” Section
21002 further states that the procedures required by CEQA “are intended to assist public agencies
in systematically identifying both the significant effects of proposed projects and the feasible
alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such
significant effects.”
Pursuant to section 21081 of the Public Resources Code, a public agency may only approve
or carry out a project for which an EIR has been completed that identifies any significant
environmental effects if the agency makes one or more of the following written finding(s) for each
of those significant effects accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding:
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.
2. Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another
public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency.
3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including
considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained
workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the
environmental impact report.
As indicated above, section 21002 requires an agency to “avoid or substantially lessen”
significant adverse environmental impacts. Thus, mitigation measures that “substantially lessen”
significant environmental impacts, even if not completely avoided, satisfy section 21002’s
mandate. (Laurel Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City Council (1978) 83 Cal.App.3d 515, 521 [“CEQA
does not mandate the choice of the environmentally best feasible project if through the imposition
of feasible mitigation measures alone the appropriate public agency has reduced env ironmental
Findings
Page 2 of 266
damage from a project to an acceptable level”]; Las Virgenes Homeowners Fed., Inc. v. County of
Los Angeles (1986) 177 Cal. App. 3d 300, 309 [“[t]here is no requirement that adverse impacts of
a project be avoided completely or reduced to a level of insignificance . . . if such would render
the project unfeasible”].)
While CEQA requires that lead agencies adopt feasible mitigation measures or alternatives
to substantially lessen or avoid significant environmental impacts, an agency need not adopt
infeasible mitigation measures or alternatives. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21002.1(c) [if “economic,
social, or other conditions make it infeasible to mitigate one or more significant effects on the
environment of a project, the project may nonetheless be carried out or approved at the discretion
of a public agency”]; see also State CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.6(a) [an “EIR is not required to
consider alternatives which are infeasible”].) CEQA defines “feasible” to mean “capable of being
accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account
economic, environmental, social, and technological factors.” (Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1.)
The State CEQA Guidelines add “legal” considerations as another indicia of feasibility. (State
CEQA Guidelines, § 15364.) Project objectives also inform the determination of “feasibility.”
(Jones v. U.C. Regents (2010) 183 Cal. App. 4th 818, 828-829.) “‘[F]easibility’ under CEQA
encompasses ‘desirability’ to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the
relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors.” (City of Del Mar v. City of
San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 401, 417; see also Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of
Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.App.4th 704, 715.) “Broader considerations of policy thus come into play
when the decision making body is considering actual feasibility[.]” (Cal. Native Plant Soc’y v.
City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957, 1000 (“Native Plant”); see also Pub. Resources
Code, § 21081(a)(3) [“economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations” may justify
rejecting mitigation and alternatives as infeasible] (emphasis added).)
Environmental impacts that are less than significant do not require the imposition of
mitigation measures. (Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d
1337, 1347.)
The California Supreme Court has stated, “[t]he wisdom of approving . . . any development
project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound
discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The
law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore
balanced.” (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 576.) In
addition, perfection in a project or a project’s environmental alternatives is not required; rather,
the requirement is that sufficient information be produced “to permit a reasonable choice of
alternatives so far as environmental aspects are concerned.” Outside agencies (including courts)
are not to “impose unreasonable extremes or to interject [themselves] within the area of discretion
as to the choice of the action to be taken.” (Residents Ad Hoc Stadium Com. v. Board of Trustees
(1979) 89 Cal.App.3d 274, 287.)
Findings
Page 3 of 266
SECTION II
FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS NOT REQUIRING MITIGATION
The City Council hereby finds that the following potential environmental impacts of the
General Plan are less than significant and therefore do not require the imposition of Mitigation
Measures.
A. AESTHETICS
1. Scenic Vistas
Threshold: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AES-1, pages 5.1-8 through 5.1-
10)
Explanation: The Study Area is surrounded by mountain and hillside terrain that offer
scenic vistas, the view of which are available throughout the Study Area
and major roadways. Implementation of the Project would result in new
development and intensification of existing urban uses throughout the Study
Area that may detract from the existing scenic vistas. However, the General
Plan Update Land Use Map would maintain existing designated Open Space
areas in the San Jacinto Mountain foothills to the northeast and Lakeview
Mountains to the west. Further, the San Jacinto Development Code (SJDC)
would regulate maximum building height, building setbacks, building type
and intensity, and other development characteristics in place in each zoning
district to protect scenic vistas within the Study Area.
SJDC Chapter 17.630 provides for project-specific design review of future
development proposals within City limits, which would ensure that
development pursuant to the General Plan Update is attractive and cohesive
without diminishing the quality of the natural beauty of the general vicinity.
Design review would be required for the construction of any structure, or to
relocate, rebuild, or significantly enlarge or modify any existing structure
or site within the City. Criteria to be considered includes efficiency of site
layout and design, compatibility in scale and aesthetic treatment of
proposed structures with public areas, and consistency with design
guidelines/standards, the General Plan, or any other applicable specific
plan. Additionally, San Jacinto Municipal Code Chapter 15.28, Hillside
Development, regulates development of hillside areas by relating the
number and distribution of dwelling units and other buildings to the
topography to prevent disfigurement of the terrain through extensive cut and
fill. Accordingly, projects which may impact views of ridgelines would be
given particular attention. Future development within the City’s SOI that is
under the County’s land use control would be subject to the County’s
entitlement requirements, regulations, and design review process.
Findings
Page 4 of 266
Furthermore, the General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions are
intended to ensure that urbanization of the Study Area would not result in
substantial adverse effects on a scenic vista. For example, Policy LU-3.1
ensures the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and
the ability of new development to enhance the character of the surrounding
area. Policy LU-5.3 identifies and preserves the positive characteristics and
features of a site, such as viewsheds, heritage trees, and rock outcroppings,
during the design and development of new projects. Policy RM-1.1 supports
a balanced and integrated system of open space that reflects aesthetics and
community identity considerations. Policy RM-1.2 preserves scenic
resources in San Jacinto, including mature trees, rock outcroppings,
hillsides, ridgelines, and other prominent natural landforms. Policy RM-1.5
requires orderly development of hillside areas through compliance with the
City’s Hillside Development Ordinance. Action RM-1e retains the
significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s eastern and western
borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development on the
more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.
Action RM-1h directs the City to identify local scenic routes and vistas and
explore developing guidelines for development visible from these scenic
routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas. Therefore, implementation of
the General Plan Update impacts related to having a substantial adverse
effect on a scenic vista would be less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-2.2: Infill Development. Encourage new development to occur in infill
locations in a balanced and efficient pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves open space, and
creates convenient connections to other land uses and activity centers.
Policy LU-3.1: Surrounding Uses. Consider as part of the development review process
the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new
development to enhance the character of the surrounding area.
Policy LU-3.7: Hillside Development. Conserve hillsides by limiting development on
slopes greater than 25 percent and allowing unique planning techniques such as Specific
Plans, Planned Unit Developments, and clustered development to reduce grading.
Action LU-3b: Through the development review process, evaluate development proposals
for land use and transportation network compatibility with existing surrounding or abutting
development or neighborhoods.
Action LU-3c: Analyze land use compatibility through the development review process to
require adequate buffers and/or architectural enhancements that protect sensitive receptors
from intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances and health
risks.
Findings
Page 5 of 266
Action LU-3e: During both redevelopment and the development of new projects,
encourage the provision and maintenance of setbacks and buffers, such as roadways,
topographic features, and open space, to prevent incompatibilities between agricultural and
non-agricultural land uses.
Policy LU-5.1: Design Features. Enhance the City's identity with attractive high-quality
gateways, city entry signs and design features, cohesive street signs, and other design
features at public gathering spaces and other areas, where appropriate.
Policy LU-5.2: Standards and Guidelines. Develop and enforce development standards
and objective design guidelines that provide clear direction for achieving quality
community design in new development and redevelopment projects.
Policy LU-5.3: Site Planning. Identify and preserve, as feasible, the positive
characteristics and features of a site, such as viewsheds, heritage trees, and rock
outcroppings, during the design and development of new projects.
Policy LU-5.5: Sustainable Design. Support “green” and “sustainable” developments that
respect and conserve the region’s important resources.
Policy LU-5.7: Landscaping. Use landscaping for screening, solar control, parking lot
shade, and other beautification purposes throughout the City.
Policy LU-5.8: Streetscapes. Promote drought tolerant landscaping, tree planting, and tree
preservation along City streets as a means of improving aesthetics, making neighborhoods
more pedestrian-friendly, and providing environmental and economic benefits.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.2: Scenic Resources. Encourage the preservation of San Jacinto’s scenic
resources, including mature trees, rock outcroppings, hillsides, ridgelines, and other
prominent natural landforms, to the extent practical.
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Policy RM-1.5: Hillside Development. Require the orderly development of hillside areas
through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance.
Action RM-1e: For Hillside Development Projects, implement the City's Hillside
Development Standards to retain the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s
Findings
Page 6 of 266
eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development
on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.
Action RM-1h: Identify local scenic routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines
for development visible from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas.
Policy RM-3.5: Public Art. Promote the use of public art that celebrates the diverse and
culturally rich history of San Jacinto at key gateways, major projects, and public gathering
places.
Policy RM-7.9: Open Space in Nonresidential Development. Encourage outdoor
gathering spaces, such as mini-parks and plazas, be incorporated into nonresidential
development to encourage social interaction, create experience-oriented centers, and
enhance the visual character of the community.
2. Scenic Resources
Threshold: Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AES-2, page 5.1-11 through 5.1-
14)
Explanation: There are no officially designated State Scenic Highways that traverse San
Jacinto. Although the General Plan Update does not propose any changes
to the County’s designated scenic highways, future development could
occur adjacent to County eligible scenic highways. Future development
would be subject to conformance with applicable San Jacinto Municipal
Code requirements and be guided by relevant General Plan Update policies,
including Policy LU-3.1, which ensures the compatibility of new
development with surrounding uses and the ability of new development to
enhance the character of the surrounding area. Policy LU-5.3 identifies and
preserves the significant features of a site, such as viewsheds, heritage trees,
and rock outcroppings, during the design and development of new projects.
Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated system of open space that
reflects aesthetics and community identity considerations. Policy RM-1.2
preserves scenic resources in San Jacinto, including mature trees, rock
outcroppings, hillsides, ridgelines, and other prominent natural landforms.
Policy RM-1.5 requires orderly development of hillside areas through
compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance. Action RM-
1e retains the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s eastern
and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive
development on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and
western hillsides. Action RM-1h directs the City to identify local scenic
routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines for development visible
from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas.
Findings
Page 7 of 266
Special attention would be given to all development proposals that could
affect views of, or otherwise alter, ridgelines. Pursuant to SJDC Chapter
17.630, all development located on hillsides having a natural slope gradient
of 15 percent or greater is subject to Municipal Code Chapter 15.28, Hillside
Development, which regulates development of hillside areas by relating the
number and distribution of dwelling units and other buildings to the
topography to prevent disfigurement of the terrain through extensive cut and
fill. Historic buildings would be preserved as required by federal, State, and
local policies, including SJDC Chapter 17.510, which provides guidelines
to assist in the identification and preservation of historic and cultural
resources within the City. General Plan Update policies provide additional
protections for historic buildings, including Policy RM-3.1 which protects
areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic
resources. Policy RM-3.6 identifies, designates, and protects buildings,
districts, and sites of historic importance within San Jacinto. Action RM-3a
ensures that the City would continue to assess development proposals for
potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological
resources pursuant to CEQA. Action RM-3b requires that for structures that
potentially have historic significance, a study be conducted by a
professional archaeologist or historian to determine the actual significance
of the structure and potential impacts of the proposed development in
accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. Action RM-3o directs
the City to conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into
consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic,
architectural, or cultural significance.
Future development within the City’s SOI that is under the County’s land
use control would be subject to the County’s entitlement requirements,
regulations, and design review process. The General Plan Update goals,
policies, and actions described above and the SJDC are intended to ensure
that development within the Study Area would not result in substantial
damage to scenic resources. Therefore, implementation of the General Plan
Update would not significantly impact scenic resources within a State
scenic highway and impacts would be less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-2.2: Infill Development. Encourage new development to occur in infill
locations in a balanced and efficient pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves open space, and
creates convenient connections to other land uses and activity centers.
Policy LU-3.1: Surrounding Uses. Consider as part of the development review process
the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new
development to enhance the character of the surrounding area.
Findings
Page 8 of 266
Policy LU-3.7: Hillside Development. Conserve hillsides by limiting development on
slopes greater than 25 percent and allowing unique planning techniques such as Specific
Plans, Planned Unit Developments, and clustered development to reduce grading.
Action RM-3a: Continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to
sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Action LU-3b: Through the development review process, evaluate development proposals
for land use and transportation network compatibility with existing surrounding or abutting
development or neighborhoods.
Action LU-3c: Analyze land use compatibility through the development review process to
require adequate buffers and/or architectural enhancements that protect sensitive receptors
from intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances and health
risks.
Action LU-3e: During both redevelopment and the development of new projects,
encourage the provision and maintenance of setbacks and buffers, such as roadways,
topographic features, and open space, to prevent incompatibilities between agricultural and
non-agricultural land uses.
Policy LU-5.1: Design Features. Enhance the City's identity with attractive high-quality
gateways, city entry signs and design features, cohesive street signs, and other design
features at public gathering spaces and other areas, where appropriate.
Policy LU-5.2: Standards and Guidelines. Develop and enforce development standards
and objective design guidelines that provide clear direction for achieving quality
community design in new development and redevelopment projects.
Policy LU-5.3: Site Planning. Identify and preserve, as feasible, the significant features
of a site, such as viewsheds, heritage trees, and rock outcroppings, during the design and
development of new projects.
Policy LU-5.5: Sustainable Design. Support “green” and “sustainable” developments that
respect and conserve the region’s important resources.
Policy LU-5.7: Landscaping. Use landscaping for screening, solar control, parking lot
shade, and other beautification purposes throughout the City.
Policy LU-5.8: Streetscapes. Promote drought tolerant landscaping, tree planting, and tree
preservation along City streets as a means of improving aesthetics, making neighborhoods
more pedestrian-friendly, and providing environmental and economic benefits.
Findings
Page 9 of 266
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.2: Scenic Resources. Encourage the preservation of San Jacinto’s scenic
resources, including mature trees, rock outcroppings, hillsides, ridgelines, and other
prominent natural landforms, to the extent practical.
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multip le
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Policy RM-1.5: Hillside Development. Require the orderly development of hillside areas
through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance.
Action RM-1e: For Hillside Development Projects, implement the City's Hillside
Development Standards to retain the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s
eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development
on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.
Action RM-1h: Identify local scenic routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines
for development visible from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas.
Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic,
archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources
Code.
Policy RM-3.5: Public Art. Promote the use of public art that celebrates the diverse and
culturally rich history of San Jacinto at key gateways, major projects, and public gathering
places.
Policy RM-3.6: Historic Preservation. Identify, designate, and protect buildings,
districts, and sites of historic importance within San Jacinto.
Action RM-3b: For structures that potentially have historic significance, the City shall
require that a study be conducted by a professional archaeologist or historian to determine
the actual significance of the structure and potential impacts of the proposed development
in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The City may require modification
of the project and/or mitigation measures to avoid any impact to a historic structure, when
feasible, such as retaining or rehabilitating historic buildings pursuant to City of San
Jacinto guidelines or relocating the historic building as feasible.
Findings
Page 10 of 266
Action RM-3o: Conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration
buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural
significance.
Policy RM-7.9: Open Space in Nonresidential Development. Encourage outdoor
gathering spaces, such as mini-parks and plazas, be incorporated into nonresidential
development to encourage social interaction, create experience-oriented centers, and
enhance the visual character of the community.
3. Visual Character
Threshold: In non-urbanized areas, would the project substantially degrade the existing
visual character or quality of public view of the site and its surroundings?
If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AES-3, pages 5.1-15 through 5.1-
18)
Explanation: All construction activities related to the General Plan Update would be
temporary in nature and all construction equipment would ultimately be
removed from individual project sites following completion of construction
activities. Therefore, changes to local visual character and quality
associated with construction of future development would be temporary,
and impacts would be less than significant.
The General Plan Update would support additional development beyond
existing conditions. In general, the General Plan Update Land Use Element
proposes an increase in building density and intensity, in accordance with
State and regional housing and climate change goals. The General Plan
Update incorporates consistent and compatible development intensities that
would maintain and enhance the overall visual character/quality of the
Study Area. Specifically, the Land Use Element includes goals and policies,
maps, and diagrams to control and direct the general distribution, location,
and extent of land uses within the Study Area. For example, Policy LU-3.1
ensures the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and
the ability of new development to enhance the character of the surrounding
area. Policy LU-5.3 identifies and preserves the significant features of a site,
such as viewsheds, heritage trees, and rock outcroppings, during the design
and development of new projects. Policy RM-1.2 preserves scenic resources
in San Jacinto, including mature trees, rock outcroppings, hillsides,
ridgelines, and other prominent natural landforms. Policy RM-1.5 requires
orderly development of hillside areas through compliance with the City’s
Hillside Development Ordinance. Action RM-1h directs the City to identify
local scenic routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines for
development visible from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic
vistas. Future growth would largely occur in areas that are already
Findings
Page 11 of 266
developed, as described above. Additionally, the General Plan Update
would maintain existing designated Open Space areas in the San Jacinto
Mountain foothills to the northeast and Lakeview Mountains to the west.
Policy LU 2.2 would encourage new development to occur in infill locations
in a pattern that preserves open space. Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced
and integrated system of open space that reflects aesthetics and community
identity considerations. Action RM-1e retains the significant hillsides and
ridgelines on San Jacinto’s eastern and western borders as Open Space,
allowing areas of non-intensive development on the more gently sloped
areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides. Guiding future growth
and development based on the General Plan Update would ensure future
development complements and protects the quality of the existing
environment.
All future development would also be subject to conformance with
applicable SJDC requirements. SJDC Article 2, Zones, Allowable Land
Uses, and Zone-Specific Standards, would regulate maximum building
height, building setbacks, parking and garage/carport placement,
landscaping and screening requirements, and other development
characteristics in place in each zoning district to protect the City’s long-
term visual character. Pursuant to SJDC Chapter 17.630, future
development projects would be subject to project-specific design review to
ensure compatibility in scale and aesthetic treatment of proposed structures
with public areas, and consistency with design guidelines/standards, the
General Plan, or any other applicable specific plan (refer to Impact AES-2).
Pursuant to SJDC Section 17.600.090, Environmental Review, future land
use and development review applications would undergo environmental
review on a project-by-project basis prior to consideration by the decision-
making authority. If necessary, mitigation would be recommended to
reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.
The implementation of policies and actions contained in the General Plan
Update and compliance with the SJDC would ensure that new development
in the Study Area would be designed to enhance the visual quality of the
area and be visually compatible with existing development and open space
resources. Therefore, implementation of the General Plan Update would
not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public
views or conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing
scenic quality. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-2.2: Infill Development. Encourage new development to occur in infill
locations in a balanced and efficient pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves open space, and
creates convenient connections to other land uses and activity centers.
Findings
Page 12 of 266
Policy LU-3.1: Surrounding Uses. Consider as part of the development review process
the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new
development to enhance the character of the surrounding area.
Policy LU-3.7: Hillside Development. Conserve hillsides by limiting development on
slopes greater than 25 percent and allowing unique planning techniques such as Specific
Plans, Planned Unit Developments, and clustered development to reduce grading.
Action LU-3b: Through the development review process, evaluate development proposals
for land use and transportation network compatibility with existing surrounding or abutting
development or neighborhoods.
Action LU-3c: Analyze land use compatibility through the development review process to
require adequate buffers and/or architectural enhancements that protect sensitive receptors
from intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances and health
risks.
Action LU-3e: During both redevelopment and the development of new projects,
encourage the provision and maintenance of setbacks and buffers, such as roadways,
topographic features, and open space, to prevent incompatibilities between agricultural and
non-agricultural land uses.
Policy LU-5.1: Design Features. Enhance the City's identity with attractive high-quality
gateways, city entry signs and design features, cohesive street signs, and other design
features at public gathering spaces and other areas, where appropriate.
Policy LU-5.2: Standards and Guidelines. Develop and enforce development standards
and objective design guidelines that provide clear direction for achieving quality
community design in new development and redevelopment projects.
Policy LU-5.3: Site Planning. Identify and preserve, as feasible, the significant features
of a site, such as viewsheds, heritage trees, and rock outcroppings, during the design and
development of new projects.
Policy LU-5.5: Sustainable Design. Support “green” and “sustainable” developments that
respect and conserve the region’s important resources.
Policy LU-5.7: Landscaping. Use landscaping for screening, solar control, parking lot
shade, and other beautification purposes throughout the City.
Policy LU-5.8: Streetscapes. Promote drought tolerant landscaping, tree planting, and tree
preservation along City streets as a means of improving aesthetics, making neighborhoods
more pedestrian-friendly, and providing environmental and economic benefits.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
Findings
Page 13 of 266
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.2: Scenic Resources. Encourage the preservation of San Jacinto’s scenic
resources, including mature trees, rock outcroppings, hillsides, ridgelines, and other
prominent natural landforms, to the extent practical.
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Policy RM-1.5: Hillside Development. Require the orderly development of hillside areas
through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance.
Action RM-1e: For Hillside Development Projects, implement the City's Hillside
Development Standards to retain the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s
eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development
on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.
Action RM-1h: Identify local scenic routes and vistas and explore developing guidelines
for development visible from these scenic routes to minimize impacts to scenic vistas.
Policy RM-3.5: Public Art. Promote the use of public art that celebrates the diverse and
culturally rich history of San Jacinto at key gateways, major projects, and public gathering
places.
Policy RM-7.9: Open Space in Nonresidential Development. Encourage outdoor
gathering spaces, such as mini-parks and plazas, be incorporated into nonresidential
development to encourage social interaction, create experience-oriented centers, and
enhance the visual character of the community
4. Light and Glare
Threshold: Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AES-4, pages 5.1-19)
Explanation: Future development accommodated through implementation of the General
Plan Update could introduce new sources of light or glare with the potential
to adversely affect day or nighttime views. Light and glare impacts could
result from new light sources such as street lighting, interior and exterior
building lighting (including for safety purposes), vehicle headlights,
illuminated signage, traffic signals, and new glare sources such as reflective
building materials, roofing materials, and windows. All lighting installed in
future development projects as a result of the implementation of the General
Plan Update would be subject to conformance with applicable SJDC
Findings
Page 14 of 266
requirements and guided by General Plan Update Land Use Element Action
LU-3c, which would ensure sensitive receptors are protected from the
intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances
through the development review process. Pursuant to SJDC Section
17.300.080, Outdoor Light and Glare, all exterior lighting would be
shielded or modified, and located so as to eliminate spillover illumination
or glare beyond the property line or upward into the sky. SJDC Section
17.300.080 would also ensure lighting fixtures used to illuminate an outdoor
advertising display be directed downward. Further, SJDC Section
17.330.080, Parking Design and Development Standards, provides a
maximum height limit of 25 feet tall for parking lot light standards and
ensures illumination of parking lots does not exceed one-half foot-candle
along lot lines of a project. Pursuant to SJDC Section 17.600.090, all future
land use and development review applications would undergo
environmental review on a project-by-project basis prior to consideration
by the decision-making authority. If necessary, mitigation would be
recommended to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.
Therefore, implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in
adverse light and glare impacts. Impacts would be less than significant in
this regard
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Action LU-3c: Analyze land use compatibility through the development review process to
require adequate buffers and/or architectural enhancements that protect sensitive receptors
from intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances and health
risks.
B. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
1. Forestland Zoning and Loss of Forest Land
Threshold: Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of,
forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104(g), or result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
Finding: No Impact. (Draft EIR, page 5.2-7)
Explanation: There are no forest lands or timber lands located within the Study Area.
There are also no parcels that are currently zoned as forest land, timber, or
timber production. Therefore, implementation of the proposed General Plan
Update would have no impact on forest land, timber, or timber production.
Findings
Page 15 of 266
C. AIR QUALITY
1. Air Quality Plans
Threshold: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air quality plan?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AQ-1, pages 5.3-27 through 5.3-
32)
Explanation: The Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has
adopted a series of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) to lead the Air
Basin into compliance with several criteria air pollutant standards and other
federal requirements, while taking into account construction and
operational emissions associated with population and economic growth
projections provided by the Southern California Association of
Government’s (SCAG’s) 2020 RTP/SCS. CEQA requires that general plans
be evaluated for consistency with the AQMP. Indicators of consistency
include control strategies and growth projections.
Construction Emissions
Future development of individual projects under the General Plan Update
would be required to comply with CARB’s requirements to minimize short-
term emissions from on-road and off-road diesel equipment, including the
ATCM to limit heavy-duty diesel motor vehicle idling to no more than five
minutes at any given time, and with SCAQMD’s regulations such as Rule
403 for controlling fugitive dust and Rule 1113 for controlling VOC
emissions from architectural coatings. Furthermore, as applicable to the
type of growth, individual projects under the proposed General Plan Update
would comply with fleet rules to reduce on-road truck emissions (i.e., 13
CCR, Section 2025 (CARB Truck and Bus regulation)). Compliance with
these measures and requirements would be consistent with and meet or
exceed the AQMP requirements for control strategies intended to reduce
emissions from construction equipment and activities. Implementation of
the General Plan Update would result in an increase in short-term
employment compared to existing conditions. However, these jobs would
be temporary in nature. Therefore, the construction jobs generated by future
development accommodated by the General Plan Update would not conflict
with the long-term employment or population projections upon which the
AQMPs are based.
Operational Emissions
Future development under the General Plan Update would be required to
comply with CARB motor vehicle standards, SCAQMD regulations for
stationary sources and architectural coatings, Title 24 energy efficiency
standards, and, to the extent applicable, the 2020 RTP/SCS. Additionally,
Findings
Page 16 of 266
the location, design, and land uses of the growth anticipated by the General
Plan Update would implement land use and transportation strategies related
to reducing vehicle trips for residents and employees of the City by
increasing commercial and residential density near public transit with the
new land use designations such as Downtown Village and Mixed-Use. The
availability of public transportation and the focus on increasing density
relative to the existing public transportation, enables implementation of the
General Plan Update to potentially reduce vehicle trips, VMT, and
associated transportation-related emissions per capita, compared to the
existing conditions. Future development in the City of San Jacinto that is
consistent with the General Plan Update would increase vehicle trips and
VMT that would result in emissions of ozone precursors and particulate
matter. Individual projects under the General Plan Update would be
required to undergo subsequent environmental review pursuant to CEQA,
and would be required to demonstrate compliance with the AQMP.
The City of San Jacinto continues to coordinate with SCAQMD and SCAG
to ensure Citywide growth projections, land use planning efforts, and local
development patterns are accounted for in the regional planning and air
quality planning processes. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes
policies and actions to further minimize potential impacts to air quality in
support of the AQMP. Goal RM-4 of the General Plan Update Resources
Management Element addresses potential air quality impacts by supporting
projects, programs, policies and regulations that reduce impacts to air
quality by private and public construction projects. Also, Policy LU-1.1 of
the General Plan Update Land Use Element promotes a land use pattern that
would reduce pollution and air quality impacts. Therefore, the operation of
the proposed General Plan Update would not conflict with or obstruct the
implementation of the applicable air quality plan and impacts would be less
than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and
enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes
efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse
gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures
compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this
Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-4: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Improved air quality in San
Jacinto and the region through reductions in air pollutants and greenhouse gas (GHG
emissions).
Findings
Page 17 of 266
Policy RM-4.1: Regional Cooperation. Support regional efforts, including those
organized through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern California
Association of Governments, the Western Riverside Council of Governments, and the
California Air Resource Board (CARB) to implement the regional Air Quality
Management Plan.
Policy RM-4.2: Measurement and Enforcement. Coordinate with the California Air
Resources Board and South Coast Air Quality Management District to properly measure
air quality at emission sources and enforce the standards of the Clean Air Act.
Policy RM-4.4: Transportation Options. Promote alternative modes of transportation to
reduce vehicular emissions and improve air quality. (See Mobility Element)
Policy RM-4.5: Walkability. Encourage pedestrian-scale development and pedestrian-
friendly design features to reduce vehicle emissions. (See Mobility Element)
Policy RM-4.6: Sustainable Development. Encourage and incentivize higher density and
mixed-use development opportunities within designated areas of the City to lessen the
impacts of traffic congestion on local air quality. (See Land Use Element)
Policy RM-4.7: Sensitive Receptors. Insulate sensitive receptors from areas of heightened
air quality pollution, by utilizing land use planning to buffer and protect residential areas.
Policy RM-4.8: Mitigation. Require the implementation of relevant mitigation measures
for all future development upon identification of potential air quality impacts.
Policy RM-4.8: Public Engagement. Promote regional air quality programs in order to
inform the public on regional air quality concerns and encourage the engagement of all San
Jacinto residents in future planning decisions related to air quality.
Action RM-4b: Review all new industrial and commercial development projects for
potential air quality impacts to residences and other sensitive receptors. Ensure that
mitigation measures and best management practices are implemented to reduce significant
emissions of criteria pollutants.
Action RM-4c: Review development, infrastructure, and planning projects for consistency
with SCAQMD requirements during the CEQA review process. Require project applicants
to prepare air quality analyses to address SCAQMD and General Plan requirements, which
include analysis and identification of:
1. Air pollutant emissions associated with the project during construction, project
operation, and cumulative conditions.
2. Potential exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants.
3. Significant air quality impacts associated with the project for construction, project
operation, and cumulative conditions.
Findings
Page 18 of 266
4. Mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts to less than significant or the
maximum extent feasible where impacts cannot be mitigated to less than
significant.
Action RM-4d: Work with the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern
California Association of Governments, the Western Riverside Council of Governments,
and the California Air Resource Board (CARB) to implement programs aimed at
improving regional air quality.
Action RM-4n: Future development projects implemented under the General Plan will be
required to demonstrate consistency with SCAQMD construction emission thresholds.
Where emissions from individual projects exceed SCAQMD thresholds, the following
actions shall be incorporated as necessary to minimize impacts. These measures do not
exclude the use of other, equally effective mitigation measures.
Require all off-road diesel equipment greater than 50 horsepower (hp) used for this
Project to meet USEPA Tier 4 final off-road emission standards or equivalent. Such
equipment shall be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT)
devices including a California Air Resources Board Certified Level 3 Diesel
Particulate Filter (DPF) or equivalent. The DPF reduces diesel particulate matter
and NOx emissions during construction activities.
Require a minimum of 50 percent of construction debris be diverted for recycling.
Require building materials to contain a minimum 10 percent recycled content.
Require materials such as paints, primers, sealants, coatings, and glues to have a
low volatile organic compound concentration compared to conventional products.
If low VOC materials are not available, architectural coating phasing should be
extended sufficiently to reduce the daily emissions of VOCs.
Action RM-4o: Future development projects implemented under the General Plan will be
required to demonstrate consistency with SCAQMD’s operational emission thresholds. For
projects where operational emissions exceed regulatory thresholds, the following measures
may be used to reduce impacts. Note the following measures are not all inclusive and
developers have the option to add or substitute measures that are equally or more
appropriate for the scope of the project.
Develop a project specific TDM program for residents and/or employees that
provides opportunities for carpool/vanpools.
Provide onsite solar/renewable energy in excess of regulatory requirements.
Require that owners/tenants of non-residential or multi-family residential
developments use architectural coatings that are 10 grams per liter or less when
repainting/repairing properties.
Findings
Page 19 of 266
Require dripless irrigation and irrigation sensor units that prevent watering during
rain storms.
Ensure all parking areas are wired for capability of future EV charging and include
EV charging stations that exceed regulatory requirements.
2. Other Adverse Emissions
Threshold: Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors)
adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact AQ-4, pages 5.3-41 through 5.3-
42)
Explanation: According to the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, construction
equipment is not a typical source of odors. Odors from the combustion of
diesel fuel would be minimized by complying with the CARB ATCM that
limits diesel-fueled commercial vehicle idling to five minutes at any given
location, which was adopted in 2004. Future development accommodated
by the General Plan Update would also comply with SCAQMD Rule 402
(Nuisance), which prohibits the emissions of nuisance air contaminants or
odorous compounds. Through adherence with mandatory compliance with
SCAQMD Rules and State measures, construction activities and materials
would not create objectionable odors. Construction of future development
would not be expected to generate nuisance odors at nearby air quality
sensitive receptors. Therefore, impacts with respect to odors would be less
than significant.
According to the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses
associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses,
wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants,
composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding.
Compliance with the City’s Municipal Code, including Section 6.24.040
which prohibits animal premises from being a source of offensive odors,
and SCAQMD’s Rule 402 (Nuisance), which prohibits the emissions of
nuisance air contaminants or odorous compounds would reduce potential
impacts. The other potential source of odors would be new waste
receptacles within the Study Area. The receptacles would be stored in areas
and in containers, as required by the City (Municipal Code Chapter 8.32,
Garbage Collection and Disposal), and be emptied on a regular basis,
before potentially substantial odors have developed. Additionally, the
policies included as part of the General Plan Update would reduce mobile
and stationary source emissions and odors associated with diesel fuel by
focusing on land use patterns that improve air quality, reduce air pollution
from stationary sources, and encourage/enable increased transit behavior.
Consequently, implementation of the General Plan Update would not create
operational-related objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
Findings
Page 20 of 266
people within the City. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard.
D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
1. Wetlands
Threshold: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact BIO-3, pages 5.4-32 through 5.4-
35)
Explanation: The General Plan Update is a planning document that enables additional
development but does not include any specific development proposals;
therefore, adoption of the General Plan Update would not directly impact
the environment. However, the Project could have an indirect change on the
physical environment through subsequently approved projects that are
consistent with the buildout under the General Plan Update. the General
Plan Resource Management Element includes policies and actions intended
to protect sensitive natural communities, including wetlands, from adverse
effects associated with future development and improvement projects
within the Study Area. Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated
open space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including
resource conservation, recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.3 preserves and enhances biological communities that
contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive,
rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with State and
federal resource agency requirements. Policy RM-1.4 addresses regional
cooperation by recognizing areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to
open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinating
the City’s actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside
County to protect and maximize regional open space. Policy RM-1.6 would
conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally
native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where
appropriate. Action RM-1c directs the City to work closely with the
USACE, USFWS, and the CDFW during the discretionary project
permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result in the alteration
of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian
habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive
biological resources. Action RM-1d directs the City to cooperate with the
County to develop and manage preserve areas within the urban landscape.
During the review of development proposals, the City would use the
MSHCP to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation
requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the
Findings
Page 21 of 266
applicable terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment
of mitigation fees, narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and
other applicable surveys. Projects located within criteria cell areas shall be
reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as appropriate. Further,
Action RM-1i addresses potential resources outside of the MSHCP area,
including the requirement to identify the presence of state or federal
regulated wetlands or waters and to ensure compliance with the applicable
requirements of the regulatory agencies and application of any mitigation
determined through the agency permitting process. Policy RM-2.4
encourages development that avoids impacts to watershed areas, wetlands,
natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining these
resources in their natural condition if feasible. Action RM-2b directs the
City to cooperate with the RWQCB to develop a plan to assist agricultural
operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters. Such a
plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife
within the planning area as well as downstream. Compliance with federal,
State, and local regulations, and implementation of General Plan Update
policies and actions, and implementation would reduce potential impacts to
wetlands to a less than significant level.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural
resources.
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.3: Biological Resource Protection. Preserve and enhance biological
communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive,
rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with state and federal resource
agency requirements.
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riversid e Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible
and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects
where appropriate.
Action RM-1c: Work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish
Findings
Page 22 of 266
and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result
in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian
habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological
resources.
Action RM-1d: Cooperate with the County of Riverside to develop and manage preserve
areas within the urban landscape. During the review of development proposals, use the
Western Riverside County MSHCP Habitat Conservation Plan (particularly Section 3.2.13
San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation
requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable
terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow
endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located
within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as
appropriate.
Action RM-1i: During the development review process, require Applicants of
developments with the potential to reduce or eliminate habitat for native plant and wildlife
species or sensitive habitats not covered by the MSHCP, as determined by the City of San
Jacinto’s Community Development Department, to prepare a site-specific general
biological resources survey to identify the presence of any sensitive biological resources,
including any sensitive plant or wildlife species. The report shall identify the need for
focused presence/absence surveys and identify the presence of state or federal regulated
wetlands or waters. Required surveys shall be conducted by qualified biologists and/or
botanists in accordance with California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and/or
United States Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) survey protocols for target species. If
no sensitive species are observed during the field survey then no further mitigation will be
required. If sensitive species or habitats, including wetlands are documented on the project
site, the project applicant shall comply with the applicable requirements of the regulatory
agencies and shall apply mitigation determined through the agency permitting process.
Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to
watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining
these resources in their natural condition if feasible.
Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a
plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.
Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the
planning area as well as downstream.
2. Wildlife Movement
Threshold: Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
Findings
Page 23 of 266
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact BIO-4, pages 5.4-35 through 5.4-
38)
Explanation: Future development under the General Plan Update could result in creation
of new barriers to animal movement in the urbanizing portions of the City;
however, impacts to wildlife movement would be mitigated through the
establishment of corridors and linkages established by compliance with the
Western Riverside MSHCP. In accordance with SJDC Section 17.520.030,
development projects would be required to comply with the applicable
terms in the MSHCP, including, but not limited to, the payment of
mitigation fees, narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other
applicable surveys. Additionally, applicants for a discretionary permit for
property located in Criteria Area/Criteria Cell(s) as designated in Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan must submit a Habitat Evaluation and
Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS) application to the Riverside
County Environmental Programs Department and subsequently to the
Western Riverside Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) for Joint
Project Review (JPR). Compliance with the SJDC would prevent
substantial interference with wildlife movement and corridors.
In compliance with the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act, the
Western Riverside County MSHCP is required by federal and State
permitting authorities to provide for the movement of species, protect
wildlife corridors and facilitate genetic flow. The MSHCP protects native
wildlife nursery sites by conserving large blocks of representative native
habitats suitable for supporting species’ lifecycle requirements and the
essential ecological processes of species which depend on such habitats.
The EIR/EIS for the MSHCP concluded that the Plan provides for the
movement of species through established wildlife corridors and protects the
use of native wildlife nursery sites; therefore, compliance with the
conservation requirements for the Cores, Linkages, and Habitat Blocks in
the Study Area would ensure wildlife nursery sites are not adversely
impacted. In addition, the General Plan Resource Management Element
includes policies and actions intended to preserve ecological and biological
resources. Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated open space
system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource
conservation, recreation, aesthetics, and community identity. Policy RM-
1.3 preserves and enhances biological communities that contribute to the
region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered
plant and wildlife species in accordance with State and federal resource
agency requirements. Policy RM-1.4 addresses regional cooperation by
recognizing areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to open space and
biological resources, such as the MSHCP, and coordinating the City’s
actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County
to protect and maximize regional open space. Policy RM-1.6 would
conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally
Findings
Page 24 of 266
native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where
appropriate. Action RM-1c directs the City to work closely with the
USACE, USFWS, and the CDFW during the discretionary project
permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result in the alteration
of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian
habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive
biological resources. Action RM-1d directs the City to cooperate with the
County to develop and manage preserve areas within the urban landscape.
During the review of development proposals, the City would use the
MSHCP (particularly Section 3.2.13 San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help
assess potential project impacts and mitigation requirements. Development
in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable terms of the
MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees,
narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable
surveys. Projects located within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through
the MSHCP Joint Project Review as appropriate. Further, Action RM-1j
requires vegetation and tree removal that would occur during the bird
nesting season would be required to conduct surveys to determine whether
active bird nests are observed within the site or vicinity. If active nests are
identified, buffers would be required to be implemented and compliance
with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) would be required. Thus,
through the protections afforded by the MSHCP, the MBTA, and General
Plan Update goals, policies, and actions, future development under the
General Plan Update would have a less than significant impact associated
with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or the use of native wildlife nursery sites.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural
resources.
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.3: Biological Resource Protection. Preserve and enhance biological
communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive,
rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with state and federal resource
agency requirements.
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Findings
Page 25 of 266
Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible
and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects
where appropriate.
Action RM-1c: Work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result
in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian
habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological
resources.
Action RM-1d: Cooperate with the County of Riverside to develop and manage preserve
areas within the urban landscape. During the review of development proposals, use the
Western Riverside County MSHCP Habitat Conservation Plan (particularly Section 3.2.13
San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation
requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable
terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow
endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located
within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as
appropriate.
Action RM-1j: Where feasible, vegetation and tree removal should occur outside of the
bird nesting season (February 1 to August 31). If not feasible, the project applicant shall
retain a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey no more than three days prior
to the commencement of construction activities. The biologist conducting the clearance
survey shall document the negative results if no active bird nests are observed on the project
site or within the vicinity during the clearance survey with a brief letter report, submitted
to the City of San Jacinto Community Development Department prior to construction,
indicating that no impacts to active bird nests would occur before construction can proceed.
If an active avian nest is discovered during the pre-construction clearance survey,
construction activities shall stay outside a 300-foot buffer around the active nest. For listed
and raptor species, this buffer shall be 500 feet. A biological monitor shall be present to
delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest to ensure the
nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activity, pursuant to the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Prior to the commencement of construction activities
and the issuance of any permits, results of the pre-construction survey and any subsequent
monitoring shall be provided to the City of San Jacinto Community Development
Department, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and other appropriate
agencies.
3. Local Policies and Ordinances
Threshold: Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact BIO-5, page 5.4-38 through 5.4-
40)
Findings
Page 26 of 266
Explanation: Future development under the General Plan Update would be subject to all
applicable federal, State, regional, and local policies and regulations related
to the protection of biological resources. The City does not have a tree
preservation policy or ordinance; however, San Jacinto Municipal Code
Chapter 12.20 addresses the City’s tree planting and street improvement
plan and requires authorization for the removal of trees in public parks,
public grounds, public streets or parking places in the City. In addition, the
General Plan Resource Management Element includes policies and actions
intended to protect biological resources. Policy RM-1.3 preserves and
enhances biological communities that contribute to the region’s
biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered plant and
wildlife species in accordance with State and federal resource agency
requirements. Policy RM-1.4 addresses regional cooperation by
recognizing areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to open space and
biological resources, such as the MSHCP, and coordinating the City’s
actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County
to protect and maximize regional open space. Action RM-1c directs the City
to work closely with the USACE, USFWS, and the CDFW during the
discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may
result in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in
wetland and riparian habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or
otherwise impact sensitive biological resources. During the review of
development proposals, the City would use the MSHCP (particularly
Section 3.2.13 San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project
impacts and mitigation requirements. Development in the City shall be
required to comply with the applicable terms of the MSHCP including, but
not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow endemic surveys,
riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located
within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project
Review as appropriate. Future development projects would be assessed for
consistency with the San Jacinto Municipal Code and General Plan Update
goals, policies, and actions. Thus, the General Plan Update would not
conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
resources and impacts would be less than significant tin this regard.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural
resources.
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.3: Biological Resource Protection. Preserve and enhance biological
Findings
Page 27 of 266
communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive,
rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with state and federal resource
agency requirements.
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible
and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects
where appropriate.
Action RM-1c: Work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result
in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian
habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological
resources.
Action RM-1d: Cooperate with the County of Riverside to develop and manage preserve
areas within the urban landscape. During the review of development proposals, use the
Western Riverside County MSHCP Habitat Conservation Plan (particularly Section 3.2.13
San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation
requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable
terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow
endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located
within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as
appropriate.
4. Habitat Conservation Plans
Threshold: Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact BIO-6, pages 5.4-40 through 5.4-
42)
Explanation: There are two Habitat Conservation Plans/Natural Community
Conservation Plans within the Study Area: the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat
Habitat Conservation Plan and the Western Riverside County Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP).
The northeastern portion of the Study Area, within the City of San Jacinto’s
SOI, lies within the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Fee Area. The portion of the
Findings
Page 28 of 266
Study Area within the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Fee Area is located within
unincorporated Riverside County. The General Plan Update designates the
area within the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Fee Area as Open Space. The
General Plan Update is in conformance with the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat
Habitat Conservation Plan, as evidenced by the area remaining as Open
Space in the Potrero ACEC Reserve area, as designated by the Habitat
Conservation Plan.
The Study Area lies within the Western Riverside County MSHCP. The
General Plan Update has been designed to direct future development and
redevelopment to areas that are already developed or designated for
development, and would maintain 6,189 acres of existing Open Space areas
in the San Jacinto Mountain foothills in the northeast and Lakeview
Mountains in the western portion of the Study Area. Focusing development
and redevelopment within areas that consist primarily of developed and/or
disturbed land would minimize conflicts with the MSHCP. However, future
development and redevelopment may include future projects within
MSHCP Conserved Lands, Criteria Cells, and Public/Quasi Public Lands.
Such future development would be required to undergo project-specific
environmental and design review to determine whether the project would
be consistent with the MSHCP. Additionally, the General Plan Update
includes goals, policies, and actions that would maintain, protect, and
preserve biologically significant habitats where practical, which would
serve to maintain consistency with the MSHCP. Policy RM-1.3 preserves
and enhances biological communities that contribute to the region’s
biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered plant and
wildlife species in accordance with State and federal resource agency
requirements. Policy RM-1.4 addresses regional cooperation by
recognizing areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to open space and
biological resources, such as the MSHCP, and coordinating the City’s
actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County
to protect and maximize regional open space. Action RM-1c directs the City
to work closely with the USACE, USFWS, and the CDFW during the
discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may
result in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in
wetland and riparian habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or
otherwise impact sensitive biological resources. Action RM-1d directs City
to cooperate with the County to develop and manage preserve areas within
the urban landscape. During the review of development proposals, the City
would use the MSHCP (particularly Section 3.2.13 San Jacinto Valley Area
Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation requirements.
Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable
terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation
fees, narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable
surveys. Projects located within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through
the MSHCP Joint Project Review as appropriate. As such, implementation
Findings
Page 29 of 266
of the General Plan Update would not conflict with the provisions of the
Western Riverside County MSHCP, Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat
conservation plan and impacts would be less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural
resources.
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.3: Biological Resource Protection. Preserve and enhance biological
communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive,
rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with state and federal resource
agency requirements.
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible
and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects
where appropriate.
Action RM-1c: Work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result
in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian
habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological
resources.
Action RM-1d: Cooperate with the County of Riverside to develop and manage preserve
areas within the urban landscape. During the review of development proposals, use the
Western Riverside County MSHCP Habitat Conservation Plan (particularly Section 3.2.13
San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation
requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable
terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow
endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located
within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as
appropriate.
Findings
Page 30 of 266
E. CULTURAL RESOURCES
1. Historical Resources
Threshold: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, § 15064.5?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact CUL-1, pages 5.5-24 through 5.5-
26)
Explanation: There are 152 recorded historic built environment resources throughout the
Study Area. These historic resources are scattered throughout the Study
Area and vary in terms of type, architectural style, condition, and alteration
history. While the General Plan Update does not directly propose any
changes to any historic resources, future development allowed under the
General Plan Update could cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of known historical resources or unknown historical resources
which have not yet been identified. The General Plan Update Resource
Management Element includes goals, policies, and actions addressing
heritage resources, including historical resources. Policy RM-3.1 protects
areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic
resources, as defined by the California Public Resources Code. Policy RM-
3.6 identifies, designates, and protects buildings, districts, and sites of
historic importance within San Jacinto. Policy RM-3.7 identifies funding
programs to assist private property owners in the preservation of historic
resources. Action RM-3a ensures the City would continue to assess
development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic,
archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA. Action
RM-3b requires that, for structures that potentially have historic
significance, a study be conducted by a professional archaeologist or
historian to determine the actual significance of the structure and potential
impacts of the proposed development in accordance with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.5. The City may require modification of the project and/or
mitigation measures to avoid any impact to a historic structure, when
feasible, such as retaining or rehabilitating historic buildings pursuant to
City guidelines or relocating the historic building as feasible. Action RM-
3m directs the City to develop and implement architectural standards and
historical preservation guidelines for development and redevelopment in the
Downtown Village area of the community. Action RM-3n directs the City
to develop and implement programs and/or incentives to private property
owners to help preserve, restore, or reuse historic structures while
enhancing their historical significance and integrity. Action RM-3o directs
the City to conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into
consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic,
architectural, or cultural significance.
Findings
Page 31 of 266
As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the
City, each project would be evaluated for conformance with the City’s
General Plan, Municipal Code, and other applicable State and local
regulations relative to historic and potentially historic resources.
Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also be analyzed
for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of
CEQA, pursuant to the City’s entitlement review process. Per SJDC
Chapter 17.510, potential historic resources may be considered for a
Historic Resource designation by the City, and would require a permit to
restore, rehabilitate, alter, develop, construct, demolish, remove, or change
the appearance of. Further, for structures that potentially have historical
significance, the City would require preparation of a study by a qualified
professional archaeologist or historian to determine the significance of the
structure and potential impacts of the proposed development in compliance
with CEQA. Therefore, compliance with the General Plan Update policies
and actions and existing regulations, would not cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a historical resource and impacts would be less
than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-3: Heritage Resources. A community that celebrates and preserves its rich
culture and historic assets.
Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic,
archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources
Code.
Policy RM-3.2: Cultural Reminders. Seek to incorporate reminders of San Jacinto’s
culture in the built and natural environment through adaptive reuse, signage, markers, and
other reminders of San Jacinto’s heritage.
Policy RM-3.3: Public Education. Educate and actively involve the public in preserving
cultural assets, including techniques, incentives, and legal requirements for preservation.
Policy RM-3.6: Historic Preservation. Identify, designate, and protect buildings,
districts, and sites of historic importance within San Jacinto.
Policy RM-3.7: Funding. Identify funding programs to assist private property owners in
the preservation of historic resources.
Action RM-3a: Continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to
sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Findings
Page 32 of 266
Action RM-3b: For structures that potentially have historic significance, the City shall
require that a study be conducted by a professional archaeologist or historian to determine
the actual significance of the structure and potential impacts of the proposed development
in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The City may require modification
of the project and/or mitigation measures to avoid any impact to a historic structure, when
feasible, such as retaining or rehabilitating historic buildings pursuant to City of San
Jacinto guidelines or relocating the historic building as feasible.
Action RM-3k: Promote public awareness and encourage tourism in the City by actively
identifying and enhancing the community’s historic resources through the location of
historic landmark plaques and a Historic Tour Guide. Promote tours of these sites on the
City’s and other organization’s websites.
Action RM-3l: Continue to support the improvement and enhancement of the Estudillo
Mansion and expand opportunities for public access and use of the historic treasure.
Action RM-3m: Develop and implement architectural standards and historical
preservation guidelines for development and redevelopment in the Downtown Village area
of the community. Use housing and façade rehabilitation programs to support development
and redevelopment activities that preserve and complement historic structures and
resources in the downtown.
Action RM-3n: Develop and implement programs and/or incentives to private property
owners to help preserve, restore, or reuse historic structures while enhancing their historical
significance and integrity.
Action RM-3o: Conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration
buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural
significance.
2. Archeological Resources
Threshold: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact CUL-2, pages 5.5-26 through 5.5-
28)
Explanation: The EIC record search identified a total of 80 archaeological resources
within the Study Area, including 49 prehistoric archaeological sites, seven
prehistoric isolates, three multicomponent sites, 20 historic archaeological
sites, and one historic isolate. Effects on archaeological resources deemed
to be significant could be considered adverse if they involve physical
demolition, destruction, or alteration of the resource or its immediate
surroundings such that the significance of a resource would be materially
impaired. While the General Plan Update does not directly propose site-
specific development with the potential to directly impact archaeological
Findings
Page 33 of 266
resources, future development allowed under the General Plan Update could
cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of known or unknown
archaeological resources.
The General Plan Update Resource Management Element includes goals,
policies, and actions addressing heritage resources, including
archaeological resources. Policy RM-3.1 protects areas containing
significant historic, archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined
by the California Public Resources Code. Action RM-3a ensures the City
would continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to
sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to
CEQA. Action RM-3c requires, for all development proposals within areas
with the potential to contain prehistoric/historic resources, a study to be
conducted by a professional archaeologist. The objective of the study will
be to determine if significant archaeological resources are potentially
present and if the project will significantly impact these resources. If
significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be
modified to avoid the impacts, or require mitigation measures to mitigate
the impacts. Mitigation may involve archaeological investigation and
resources recovery. Action RM-3f directs the City to make provisions for
archeological resources accidentally discovered during construction for
projects where the City has approval authority over the project. These
provisions shall include an immediate evaluation of the find and
contingency funding and time allotment sufficient to allow for the recovery
of the archeological resource or implement measures to avoid disturbing the
resource if the archeological resource is determined to be unique. Action
RM-3o directs the City to conduct a historic properties inventory that takes
into consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic,
architectural, or cultural significance.
Archaeological resources are protected under federal, State, and local
regulations and implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions
would reduce potential adverse impacts to archaeological resources
associated with future development. Subsequent development and
infrastructure projects would be analyzed for potential environmental
impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to the City’s
entitlement review process. SJDC Chapter 17.500 is intended to protect
archaeological resources and requires a resource assessment be conducted
with specific areas having been identified as having the potential for
archaeological resources. SJDC Chapter 17.500 establishes the procedures
for the resource assessment, including the potential for a resource to be
impacted and requirements if significant impacts are identified. Compliance
with the General Plan Update policies and actions and existing regulations
would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource and impacts would be less than significant.
Findings
Page 34 of 266
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-3: Heritage Resources. A community that celebrates and preserves its rich
culture and historic assets.
Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic,
archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources
Code.
Policy RM-3.3: Public Education. Educate and actively involve the public in preserving
cultural assets, including techniques, incentives, and legal requirements for preservation.
Action RM-3a: Continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to
sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Action RM-3c: For all development proposals within areas with the potential to contain
prehistoric/historic resources, the City shall require a study to be conducted by a
professional archaeologist. The objective of the study will be to determine if significant
archaeological resources are potentially present and if the project will significantly impact
these resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be
modified to avoid the impacts, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts.
Mitigation may involve archaeological investigation and resources recovery.
Action RM-3f: The City shall make provisions for archeological resources accidentally
discovered during construction for projects where the City has approval authority over the
project. These provisions shall include an immediate evaluation of the find and
contingency funding and time allotment sufficient to allow for the recovery of the
archeological resource or implement measures to avoid disturbing the resource if the
archeological resource is determined to be unique.
Action RM-3o: Conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration
buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural
significance.
3. Human Remains
Threshold: Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of dedicated cemeteries?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact CUL-3, pages 5.5-28 through 5.5-
30)
Explanation: Future construction projects within the Study Area could have the potential
to disturb or destroy buried Native American human remains as well as
other human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries.
Findings
Page 35 of 266
As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the
City, each project would be evaluated for conformance with the City’s
General Plan, Municipal Code, and other applicable State and local
regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also
be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the
requirements of CEQA. The General Plan Update Resource Management
Element includes actions addressing the potential discovery of human
remains. Action RM-3a directs the City to continue to assess development
proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and
paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA. Action RM-3d establishes
that, in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any
location other than a dedicated cemetery, the City shall halt excavation or
disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie
adjacent human remains until the County Coroner has been informed and
has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the
remains are of Native American origin, there shall be no further excavation
or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie
adjacent human remains until the descendants from the deceased Native
Americans have made a recommendation to the landowner or the persons
responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of,
with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave
goods as provided in Public Resources Code section 5097.98, or the Native
American Heritage Commission was unable to identify a descendant or the
descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being
granted access to the site. Subsequent development and infrastructure
projects would be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent
with the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to the City’s entitlement review
process. SJDC Chapter 17.500 is intended to protect archaeological
resources and addresses the potential for inadvertent discovery of human
remains consistent with Public Resources Code 5097.98 Compliance with
the General Plan Update policies and actions and existing regulations,
including Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.5(e), and PRC Section 5097.98, would ensure that potential
impacts associated with the inadvertent discovery of human remains would
be reduced to less than significant
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-3: Heritage Resources. A community that celebrates and preserves its rich
culture and historic assets.
Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic,
archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources
Code.
Findings
Page 36 of 266
Action RM-3a: Continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to
sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Action RM-3d: For projects that involve ground disturbing activities on native soil, prior
to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall enter a Treatment and Disposition
Agreement (TDA) with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to address treatment and
disposition of archaeological/cultural resources and human remains associated with
Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians that may be uncovered or oth erwise discovered during
construction of the project. The TDA may establish provisions for tribal monitors.
Following execution of the TDA by the developer and Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians,
the TDA will be incorporated by reference into the grading permit.
Action RM-3g: In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any
location other than a dedicated cemetery, the City shall halt excavation or disturbance of
the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until
the County Coroner has been informed and has determined that no investigation of the
cause of death is required. If the remains are of Native American origin, there shall be no
further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to
overlie adjacent human remains until the descendants from the deceased Native Americans
have made a recommendation to the landowner or the persons responsible for the
excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human
remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code section
5097.98, or the Native American Heritage Commission was unable to identify a descendant
or the descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being granted
access to the site.
F. ENERGY
1. Energy
Threshold: Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due
to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or operation, or conflict with or obstruct a state
or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact EN-1 pages 5.6-8 through 5.6-14)
Explanation: Buildout of the General Plan Update would use energy resources for the
operation of buildings (electricity and natural gas), for on-road vehicle trips
(e.g., gasoline and diesel fuel), and from off-road construction activities
(e.g. diesel fuel) associated with 2040 buildout of the General Plan Update.
Each of these activities would require the use of energy resources.
Developers of individual projects within the Study Area would be
responsible for conserving energy, to the extent feasible, and would rely
heavily on reducing per capita energy consumption to achieve this goal,
including through Statewide and local measures. Buildout of the General
Findings
Page 37 of 266
Plan Update would be in compliance with all applicable federal, State, and
local regulations regulating energy usage. The General Plan Update would
not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing energy use or increasing the use of renewable energy.
This is a less than significant impact in this regard.
The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to support energy
conservation and renewable energy, as well as reducing energy use. Policy
MR-5.2 ensures compliance with all State requirements regarding
generation of power and encourages energy providers to investigate the use
or expansion of renewable sources of energy. Policy RM-5.3 promotes the
development and use of renewable energy resources to reduce dependency
on fossil fuels. Policy RM-5.4 promotes the use of energy-efficient
materials, equipment, and design in public and private facilities and
infrastructure. Policy RM-5.5 promotes energy conservation and recycling
by the public and private sectors. Policy RM-5.8 promotes public education
programs that advocate for reducing energy consumption, and promote
renewable sources of energy. Action RM-5b implements energy
conservation measures in public buildings by promoting energy efficient
buildings and site design for all new public buildings during the site
development permit process, as well as installing energy saving devices in
new public buildings and retrofitting existing public buildings. Action RM-
5c uses the development review process to encourage innovative building
design, layout, and orientation techniques to minimize energy use by taking
advantage of sun/shade patterns, prevailing winds, landscaping and building
materials that control energy usage, and solar design. Action RM-5e
continues to review development projects to ensure that all new public and
private development complies with the California Code of Regulations,
Title 24 standards as well as the energy efficiency standards established by
the General Plan and the Municipal Code. Action RM-5f promotes the CEC
Building Energy Benchmarking Program on the City’s website to help
benchmark and monitor energy use for participating businesses seeking to
increase energy efficiency and realize cost savings. Action RM-5g
encourages new development projects to install electrified space (HVAC)
and water heating systems in lieu of natural gas systems, above and beyond
the requirements of Title 24, before and during the building plan check
process. Furthermore, connections exist between the Study Area and nearby
pedestrian and bicycle pathways, and public transit access exists nearby,
reducing the need for local motor vehicle travel. Although improvements to
the City’s pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit systems would provide
further opportunities for alternative transit, the Study Area would be linked
closely with existing networks that, in large part, are sufficient for most
residents of the Study Area and neighboring communities.
As a result, the General Plan Update would not result in any significant
adverse impacts related to Project energy requirements, energy use
Findings
Page 38 of 266
inefficiencies, and/or the energy intensiveness of materials by amount and
fuel type for during General Plan Update buildout, including during
construction, operations, maintenance, and/or removal. The City of San
Jacinto would comply with all existing energy standards and would not
result in significant adverse impacts on energy resources. Buildout of the
General Plan Update would not be expected cause an inefficient, wasteful,
or unnecessary use of energy resources nor conflict with or obstruct a State
or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. This is a less than
significant impact.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-5: Energy and Mineral Resources. A community that safely manages its
energy and mineral resources
Policy RM-5.1: San Jacinto Power. Continue to make clean, modern, and cost-effective
energy options available to individuals who live and work in San Jacinto.
Policy RM-5.2: Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with all state requirements
regarding the generation of power and encourage energy providers to investigate the use
or expansion of renewable sources of energy.
Policy RM-5.3: Renewable Energy. Promote the development and use of renewable
energy resources to reduce dependency on fossil fuels.
Policy RM-5.4: Energy-Efficient Materials. Promote the use of energy-efficient
materials, equipment, and design in public and private facilities and infrastructure.
Policy RM-5.5: Energy Conservation. Promote energy conservation and recycling by the
public and private sectors.
Policy RM-5.6: Energy Needs. Collaborate with local service providers in determining
and meeting the needs of the community for energy in clean, modern, and cost-effective
ways.
Policy RM-5.7: Business Community. Support the decisions of the San Jacinto business
community as they select and implement the most appropriate, financially feasible, and
responsible energy source for their individual operations.
Policy RM-5.8: Public Education. Promote public education programs that advocate for
reducing energy consumption, and promote renewable sources of energy.
Policy RM-5.9: Promote Energy Conservation in Existing Building Stock. Promote
energy conservation by residents and businesses in existing structures, in close
coordination with other agencies and local energy providers, including the SCAQMD and
Southern California Edison.
Findings
Page 39 of 266
Action RM-5a: Continue to implement the City’s Community Choice Aggregation (CCA)
program; evaluate the effectiveness of the program every five years to identify
programmatic changes necessary to continue meeting the City’s objectives.
Action RM-5b: Implement energy conservation measures in public buildings through the
following actions:
Promote energy efficient buildings and site design for all new public buildings
during the site development permit process; and
Install energy saving devices in new public buildings and retrofit existing public
buildings.
Action RM-5c: During the development review process, encourage innovative building
design, layout, and orientation techniques to minimize energy use by taking advantage of
sun/shade patterns, prevailing winds, landscaping and building materials that control
energy usage, and solar design.
Action RM-5d: Promote retrofit programs by the City to reduce energy usage and
consequently reduce emissions from energy consumption. Encourage utility companies to
provide informational literature about available retrofit programs at public facilities such
as City Hall, the Community Center , and libraries.
Action RM-5e: Continue to review development projects to ensure that all new public and
private development complies with the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 standards
as well as the energy efficiency standards established by the General Plan and the
Municipal Code.
Action RM-5f: Promote the CEC Building Energy Benchmarking Program (AB 802) on
the City’s website to help benchmark and monitor energy use for participating businesses
seeking to increase energy efficiency and realize cost savings.
Action RM-5g: Encourage new development projects to install electrified space (HVAC)
and water heating systems in lieu of natural gas systems, above and beyond the
requirements of Title 24, before and during the building plan check process.
Action RM-5h: During the development review process, require that all new
developments adjacent to or near natural gas lines, coordinate with So Cal Gas to install
and connect to the lines, as feasible.
Action RM-5i: Advertise the San Jacinto Power PureGreen program and encourage San
Jacinto Power customers to enroll in the program and opt-up to 100 percent renewable
energy content.
Findings
Page 40 of 266
G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
1. Seismic Hazards
Threshold: Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a
known earthquake fault, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic-related
ground failure, including liquefaction, or landslides?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact GS-1 pages 5.7-20 through 5.7-
23)
Explanation: The Study Area is situated within a seismically active region, specifically
within the San Jacinto fault zone. The Alquist-Priolo fault zone runs two
parallel tracks through the City; one fault runs through the western portion
of the City, and one fault runs through the Sphere of Influence in the eastern
portion of the Study Area. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo fault
zone would be required to comply with regulatory requirements of the State
of California Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, which requires
any proposed development to prepare a geologic report to address the
potential for surface fault displacement within the Project site. Future
development projects would be required to comply with the provisions of
the California Building Standards Code (CBSC), which requires
development projects to: perform geotechnical investigations in accordance
with State law, engineer improvements to address potential seismic and
ground failure issues, and use earthquake-resistant construction techniques
to address potential earthquake loads when constructing buildings and
improvements. As future development and infrastructure projects are
considered by the City, each project will be evaluated for conformance with
the CBSC, General Plan, San Jacinto Municipal Code, and other
regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure would also be
analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the
requirements of CEQA. In addition to the requirements associated with the
CBSC and the Municipal Code, the General Plan includes policies and
actions in both the Public Safety Element and Resource Management
Element to address potential impacts associated with seismic activity. For
example, Policy PS-1 requires the maintenance of the City’s geologic and
seismic hazards map (Figure PS-1 in the Public Safety Element). Policy PS
1.2 requires the enforcement of the State’s seismic design guidelines and all
relevant building codes in order to reduce the risk of damage associated with
seismic activity. Policy PS-1.5 requires the assessment and mitigation of
hazards related to liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new
development projects or City improvement projects that are identified by
the City as susceptible to these hazards. The Resource Management
Element includes Action RM-1g, to ensure proper geotechnical and soil
management techniques are implemented during the development review
process.
Findings
Page 41 of 266
Development projects are reviewed to address seismic safety issues and
would be required to provide adequate mitigation for existing and potential
hazards identified. With the implementation of the policies and actions in
the General Plan, as well as applicable State and City codes, potential
impacts associated with a seismic event, including rupture of an earthquake
fault, seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, and landslides would be less
than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Seismic and Geologic Hazards: A community that is adequately prepared for
natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity.
Policy PS-1.1: Geologic Hazard Identification. Maintain the City’s geologic and seismic
hazards map (Figure PS-1) in concert with updates from the California Geologic Survey
and local surveys, and update as appropriate.
Policy PS-1.2: Earthquake Protection. Enforce State seismic design guidelines and all
relevant building codes to reduce the risk of damage associated with seismic activity.
Policy PS-1.3: Fault Zones. Encourage landscaped open space uses for areas within
identified fault zones and limit the development of new sensitive uses in these areas.
Policy PS-1.4: Liquefaction. Require site-specific studies in areas subject to liquefaction
to determine the nature and extent of potential liquefaction and to identify engineering and
development siting measures to permit development to occur safely.
Policy PS-1.5: Development. Require assessment and mitigation of hazards related to
liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new development projects or City improvement
projects that are identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards.
Policy PS-1.6: Impact Reduction. Reduce the risk of impacts from geologic and seismic
hazards by applying proper and up to date land use planning, development engineering,
building construction, and retrofitting requirements.
Policy PS-1.8: Critical Facilities. Require new critical infrastructure and facilities that
may be built in the City to incorporate site specific seismic structural design as required by
applicable building codes.
Action PS-1a: Review development proposals to ensure compliance with California
Health and Safety Code Section 19100 et seq. (Earthquake Protection Law), which requires
that buildings be designed to resist stresses produced by natural forces such as earthquakes
and wind.
Action PS-1b: Update building, zoning, and grading codes as needed to ensure adopted
standards mitigate potential seismic hazards and comply with the Alquist-Priolo Act and
Findings
Page 42 of 266
Unreinforced Masonry Law.
Action PS-1d: Reduce the risk to the community from hazards related to geologic
conditions, seismic activity, flooding, and wildfires by requiring feasible mitigation of such
impacts on development projects. Assess development proposals for potential hazards
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Require measures to mitigate all
identified significant public safety hazards.
Action PS-1e: Where the threat from natural hazards (such as fault rupture or flooding)
cannot be mitigated, use open space easements and other regulatory techniques to prohibit
development and avoid public safety hazards. Where feasible, permit the joint-use of
preserve areas and easements such as seismic faults and drainage basins for open space and
recreational uses.
Action PS-1f: To minimize damage from earthquakes and other geologic activity, adopt
and implement the most recent State seismic requirements for structural design of new
development and redevelopment.
Action PS-1g: During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals,
require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists
and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified,
require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained
within the geologic survey.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Action RM-1g: Where feasible, incorporate open space and passive recreational uses into
areas identified to have significant hazards related to flooding, geologic conditions, and
seismic events.
2. Soil Erosion
Threshold: Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact GS-2, pages 5.7-23 through 5.67-
24)
Explanation: Implementation of the General Plan Update would provide for development
and improvement projects that would involve some land clearing, mass
grading, and other ground-disturbing activities that could temporarily
increase soil erosion rates during and shortly after project construction.
Construction-related erosion could result in the loss of a substantial amount
of nonrenewable topsoil and could adversely affect water quality in nearby
surface waters. As future development and infrastructure projects are
considered by the City, each project would be evaluated for conformance
with the CBSC, General Plan, San Jacinto Municipal Code, and other
regulations. In compliance with NPDES Permit regulations, the State of
Findings
Page 43 of 266
California requires that any construction activity disturbing one acre or
more of soil comply with the Construction General Permit. The permit
requires development and implementation of a SWPPP and monitoring
plan, which must include erosion-control and sediment-control BMPs that
would meet or exceed measures required by the Construction General
Permit to control stormwater quality degradation due to potential
construction-related pollutants. The General Plan Update includes a range
of policies and actions related to best management practices, NPDES
requirements, and minimizing discharge of materials (including eroded
soils) into the storm drain system in the proposed Public Safety Element
and Resource Management Element. For example, Action PS-1g requires
that during the review of discretionary development and redevelopment
proposals, licensed soil and geologic conditions surveys are required by the
State, and when potential geologic impacts are identified, mitigation efforts
are required. Action RM-1f ensures proper geotechnical and soil
management techniques are implemented. Action RM-2a requires new
development and redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff
through implementation of BMPs. With the implementation of the policies
and actions in the General Plan Update, as well as applicable State and City
requirements, potential impacts associated with erosion and loss of topsoil
would be less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-1g: During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals,
require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists
and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified,
require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained
within the geologic survey.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and
soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or
Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State
licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential
geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the
recommendations contained within the survey.
Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively
and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water
conservation strategy.
Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new
development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through
Findings
Page 44 of 266
implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of
water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing
development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific
development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with
relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8-
2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).
3. Unstable Soils
Threshold: Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result
in on or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or
collapse?
Finding: Less than significant (Draft EIR, Impact GS-3, pages 5.7-24 through 5.7-
28)
Explanation: Future development anticipated by the General Plan Update could result in
the exposure of people and structures to conditions that have the potential
for adverse effects associated with ground instability or failure. Soils and
geologic conditions in the Study Area have the potential for landslides,
lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. The General Plan
Update Land Use, Public Safety and Resource Management elements
include policies and actions to address geologic conditions within the Study
Area. For example, Policy LU-3.4 limits development in areas subject to
severe natural hazards, such as landslides, ground subsidence, liquefaction,
and flooding. Policy PS-1 requires the maintenance of the City’s geologic
and seismic hazards map (Figure PS-1 in the Public Safety Element). Policy
PS 1.2 requires the enforcement of the State’s seismic design guidelines and
all relevant building codes in order to reduce the risk of damage associated
with seismic activity. Policy PS-1.5 requires the assessment and mitigation
of hazards related to liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new
development projects or City improvement projects that are identified by
the City as susceptible to these hazards. The Resource Management
Element includes Action RM-1g, to ensure proper geotechnical and soil
management techniques are implemented during the development review
process. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered
by the City of San Jacinto, each project would be evaluated for conformance
with the CBSC, the General Plan Update policies and actions, San Jacinto
Municipal Code, and other regulations. Subsequent development and
infrastructure projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental
impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. Future development
Findings
Page 45 of 266
and improvement projects would be required to prepare site-specific
geotechnical studies to identify geologic and soil conditions specific to the
site and provide design recommendations consistent with the requirements
of State and City codes. Implementation of CBSC and the Municipal Code
requirements related to seismic and geologic conditions and the General
Plan Update policies and actions would ensure that future development
projects are evaluated for potential geologic and seismic risks and that
potential risks are adequately addressed. With the implementation of the
policies and actions in the General Plan Update, as well as applicable State
and City codes, potential impacts associated with unstable geologic
conditions with the potential to result in landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse would be reduced to less than
significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal LU-3: Land Use Compatibility. A community that promotes high-quality
development and compatibility with surrounding land uses and major transportation
corridors.
Policy LU-3.4: Environmental Compatibility. Limit development in areas subject to
severe natural hazards, such as landslides, ground subsidence, liquefaction, and flooding.
Action LU-3a: Ensure all projects are reviewed and processed per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Seismic and Geologic Hazards. A community that is adequately prepared for
natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity.
Policy PS-1.1: Geologic Hazard Identification. Maintain the City’s geologic and seismic
hazards map (Figure PS-1) in concert with updates from the California Geologic Survey
and local surveys, and update as appropriate.
Policy PS-1.2: Earthquake Protection. Enforce State seismic design guidelines and all
relevant building codes to reduce the risk of damage associated with seismic activity.
Policy PS-1.3: Fault Zones. Encourage landscaped open space uses for areas within
identified fault zones and limit the development of new sensitive uses in these areas.
Policy PS-1.4: Liquefaction. Require site-specific studies in areas subject to liquefaction
to determine the nature and extent of potential liquefaction and to identify engineering and
development siting measures to permit development to occur safely.
Policy PS-1.5: Development. Require assessment and mitigation of hazards related to
Findings
Page 46 of 266
liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new development projects or City improvement
projects that are identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards.
Policy PS-1.6: Impact Reduction. Reduce the risk of impacts from geologic and seismic
hazards by applying proper and up to date land use planning, development engineering,
building construction, and retrofitting requirements.
Policy PS-1.7: Risk Inventories. Maintain an updated inventory of public buildings and
infrastructure within the City of San Jacinto at risk of seismic and geologic hazard impacts
and regularly evaluate potential mitigation projects to address risks, as financially feasible.
Policy PS-1.8: Critical Facilities. Require new critical infrastructure and facilities that
may be built in the City to incorporate site specific seismic structural design as required by
applicable building codes.
Action PS-1a: Review development proposals to ensure compliance with California
Health and Safety Code Section 19100 et seq. (Earthquake Protection Law), which requires
that buildings be designed to resist stresses produced by natural forces such as earthquakes
and wind.
Action PS-1b: Update building, zoning, and grading codes as needed to ensure adopted
standards mitigate potential seismic hazards and comply with the Alquist-Priolo Act and
Unreinforced Masonry Law
Action PS-1d: Reduce the risk to the community from hazards related to geologic
conditions, seismic activity, flooding, and wildfires by requiring feasible mitigation of such
impacts on development projects. Assess development proposals for potential hazards
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Require measures to mitigate all
identified significant public safety hazards.
Action PS-1e: Where the threat from natural hazards (such as fault rupture or flooding)
cannot be mitigated, use open space easements and other regulatory techniques to prohibit
development and avoid public safety hazards. Where feasible, permit the joint-use of
preserve areas and easements such as seismic faults and drainage basins for open space and
recreational uses.
Action PS-1f: To minimize damage from earthquakes and other geologic activity, adopt
and implement the most recent State seismic requirements for structural design of new
development and redevelopment.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and
soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or
Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State
licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential
geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the
Findings
Page 47 of 266
recommendations contained within the survey.
Action RM-1g: Where feasible, incorporate open space and passive recreational uses into
areas identified to have significant hazards related to flooding, geologic conditions, and
seismic events
Goal RM-2: Water Resources: A community that protects and conserves limited water
resources
Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new
development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through
implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of
water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing
development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific
development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with
relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8-
2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).
4. Expansive Soils
Threshold: Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Tables 18-1-
D of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or
indirect risks to life or property?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact GS-4, pages 5.7-28 through 5.7-
31)
Explanation: The majority of the Study Area has low expansive soils, including most of
the developed land. The areas with high expansive soils represent only a
very small portion of the Study Area and would require special design
considerations due to shrink-swell potentials. The Public Safety Element
and Resource Management Element of the General Plan Update includes
policies and actions that are designed to protect from geologic hazards,
including expansive soils. Goal PS-1, Seismic and Geologic Hazards and
Goal PS-3, Flood Hazards, contain policies and actions that limit potential
hazards created by expansive soils. Further, the Resource Management
Element goals, policies, and actions, pertaining to native vegetation and
water resource conservation; healthy soil and vegetation and water sources
help to prevent dangers originating from expansive soil situations. As future
development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each
project would be evaluated for conformance with the CBSC, General Plan
policies and actions, San Jacinto Municipal Code, and other applicable
Findings
Page 48 of 266
regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also
be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the
requirements of CEQA.
As required by the CBSC, a site-specific geotechnical investigation would
identify the potential for damage related to expansive soils and non-
uniformly compacted fill and engineered fill. If a risk is identified, design
criteria and specification options may include removal of the problematic
soils, and replacement, as needed, with properly conditioned and compacted
fill material that is designed to withstand the forces exerted during the
expected shrink-swell cycles and settlements.
Design criteria and specifications set forth in the design-level geotechnical
investigation would ensure impacts from problematic soils are minimized.
There are no additional significant adverse environmental impacts, apart
from those disclosed in the relevant chapters of this Draft EIR, that are
anticipated to occur associated with expansive soils. Therefore, this impact
is considered less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Seismic and Geologic Hazards: A community that is adequately prepared for
natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity
Policy PS-1.1: Geologic Hazard Identification. Maintain the City’s geologic and seismic
hazards map (Figure PS-1) in concert with updates from the California Geologic Survey
and local surveys, and update as appropriate
Policy PS-1.3: Fault Zones. Encourage landscaped open space uses for areas within
identified fault zones and limit the development of new sensitive uses in these areas
Policy PS-1.4: Liquefaction. Require site-specific studies in areas subject to liquefaction
to determine the nature and extent of potential liquefaction and to identify engineering and
development siting measures to permit development to occur safely.
Policy PS-1.5: Development. Require assessment and mitigation of hazards related to
liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new development projects or City improvement
projects that are identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards
Policy PS-1.6: Impact Reduction. Reduce the risk of impacts from geologic and seismic
hazards by applying proper and up to date land use planning, development engineering,
building construction, and retrofitting requirements.
Policy PS-1.7: Risk Inventories. Maintain an updated inventory of public buildings and
infrastructure within the City of San Jacinto at risk of seismic and geologic hazard impacts
and regularly evaluate potential mitigation projects to address risks, as financially feasible
Findings
Page 49 of 266
Policy PS-1.8: Critical Facilities. Require new critical infrastructure and facilities that
may be built in the City to incorporate site specific seismic structural design as required by
applicable building codes
Action PS-1a: Review development proposals to ensure compliance with California
Health and Safety Code Section 19100 et seq. (Earthquake Protection Law), which requires
that buildings be designed to resist stresses produced by natural forces such as earthquakes
and wind.
Action PS-1b: Update building, zoning, and grading codes as needed to ensure adopted
standards mitigate potential seismic hazards and comply with the Alquist-Priolo Act and
Unreinforced Masonry Law.
Action PS-1d: Reduce the risk to the community from hazards related to geologic
conditions, seismic activity, flooding, and wildfires by requiring feasible mitigation of such
impacts on development projects. Assess development proposals for potential hazards
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Require measures to mitigate all
identified significant public safety hazards.
Action PS-1e: Where the threat from natural hazards (such as fault rupture or flooding)
cannot be mitigated, use open space easements and other regulatory techniques to prohibit
development and avoid public safety hazards. Where feasible, permit the joint-use of
preserve areas and easements such as seismic faults and drainage basins for open space and
recreational uses.
Action PS-1f: To minimize damage from earthquakes and other geologic activity, adopt
and implement the most recent State seismic requirements for structural design of new
development and redevelopment.
Action PS-1a: Review development proposals to ensure compliance with California
Health and Safety Code Section 19100 et seq. (Earthquake Protection Law), which requires
that buildings be designed to resist stresses produced by natural forces such as earthquakes
and wind.
Goal PS-3: Flood Hazards. A community that is protected from flood hazards.
Policy PS-3.6: Building Codes. Adhere to the latest building, site, and design codes in the
California Building Code and FEMA flood control guidelines to avoid or minimize the risk
of flooding hazards in the community.
Policy PS-3.11: Mitigation. Require that all new development and redevelopment in areas
susceptible to flooding incorporate mitigation measures designed to reduce flood hazards.
Action PS-3b: Review projects for project-related flood control and stormwater
management impacts to ensure that all proposed development comply with the City’s MS4
permit.
Findings
Page 50 of 266
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural
resources
Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible
and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects
where appropriate.
Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and
soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or
Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State
licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential
geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the
recommendations contained within the survey.
Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water
resources
Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to
watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining
these resources in their natural condition if feasible.
Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively
and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water
conservation strategy.
Action RM-2f: Whenever feasible, incorporate improved open space and preservation
areas and quasi-active recreation facilities in areas used for ground water recharge and/or
drainage detention.
5. Septic Tanks
Threshold: Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are
not available for the disposal of waste water?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact GS-5, pages 5.7-31 through 5.7-
33)
Explanation: The City of San Jacinto sewer system service area covers the vast majority
of area within the City’s municipal boundaries. The areas within the Study
Area from which the City does not collect wastewater are served either by
septic systems, provided by Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), or
by the Lake Hemet Municipal Water District (LHMWD). Because of
varying soil characteristics and depths to groundwater throughout the Study
Area, some areas may have moderate to severe limitations on the use of
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. To the extent that
Findings
Page 51 of 266
future development under the General Plan Update would occur in such
areas, there is the potential for effects to soils that cannot adequately support
the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. However,
any individual project which would have a septic system would be required
to comply with the CSBC, which requires development projects to perform
geotechnical investigations in accordance with State law to determine that
on-site soil conditions are suitable for a septic system. Additionally, future
developments proposing a septic system must also comply with the
RWQCB Basin Plan and the Riverside County Department of Health
requirements. The Resource Management and Public Safety Elements of
the General Plan Update include Action RM-1f, and Action PS-1g, which
ensure that proper geotechnical and soil management surveys and
techniques are implemented in order to reduce the likelihood of soils that
are incapable of adequately supporting septic tanks be developed on.
Further, Policy RM-2.6 discourages the use of septic systems to reduce
potential negative impacts to groundwater.
As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the
City of San Jacinto, each project would be evaluated for conformance with
the CBSC, the General Plan policies and actions, San Jacinto Municipal
Code, and other regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure
projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts,
consistent with the requirements of CEQA. Future development and
improvement projects would be required to prepare a site-specific
geotechnical study to identify geologic and soil conditions specific to the
site and provide design recommendations consistent with the requirements
of State and City codes. Implementation of CBSC and the Municipal Code
requirements related to seismic and geologic conditions and General Plan
Update policies and actions would ensure that future development projects
are evaluated for potential geologic and seismic risks and that potential risks
are adequately addressed. With the implementation of the policies and
actions in the General Plan Update, as well as applicable State and City
codes, potential impacts associated with having soils incapable of
adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water
disposal systems would be less than significant
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Seismic and Geologic Hazards. A community that is adequately prepared for
natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity.
Action PS-1g: During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals,
require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists
and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified,
require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained
Findings
Page 52 of 266
within the geologic survey.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and
soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or
Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State
licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential
geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the
recommendations contained within the survey.
Policy RM-2.6: Septic Systems. Discourage the use of septic systems to reduce potential
negative impacts to groundwater.
Action RM-2e: Through the development review process, require that sufficient water
supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to
approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and Government Code
Section 66473.7.
Action RM-2h: Continue to encourage the conversion from existing septic systems to
sewer by limiting the replacement or expansion/repair of existing septic systems as
feasible.
6. Paleontological Resources
Threshold: Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact GS-6, pages 5.7-33 through 5.7-
35)
Explanation: Only qualified, trained paleontologists with specific expertise in the type of
fossils being evaluated can determine the scientific significance of
paleontological resources. No geologic units in the Study Area are assigned
a very high sensitivity. However, the following geologic units within the
Study Area are assigned a high sensitivity: Mount Eden Formation at
surface, Bautista Formation at surface, Older Surficial Sediments at surface,
and Surficial Sediments at depth. Further, paleontological resources have
been discovered within the Study Area. Therefore, it is possible that
undiscovered paleontological resources could be encountered during
ground-disturbing activities. The General Plan Update Resource
Management Element includes policies and actions to protect significant
paleontological resources within the Study Area. Policy RM-3.1 protects
areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and paleontological
resources, as defined by the California Public Resources Code. Action RM-
3a ensures the City would continue to assess development proposals for
potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological
Findings
Page 53 of 266
resources pursuant to CEQA. As future development occurs, project sites
located within areas identified as having high paleontological sensitivity
would be required to prepare a resource assessment. The objective of the
report is to determine if significant paleontological resources are potentially
present and if the project would significantly impact these resources for
measures to be implemented to avoid the resource; monitor soil disturbance
where there is high potential for resources; and implement mitigation
measure to mitigate impacts.
With implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions and
compliance with SJDC Section 17.500.020, potential impacts to
paleontological resources associated with future development anticipated
by the General Plan Update would be reduced to less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic,
archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources
Code.
Policy RM-3.3: Public Education. Educate and actively involve the public in preserving
cultural assets, including techniques, incentives, and legal requirements for preservation.
Policy RM-3.4: Tribal Consultation. Consult with Native American tribes that may be
impacted by proposed development, as necessary, and in accordance with state, local, and
tribal intergovernmental consultation requirements.
Policy RM-3.6: Historic Preservation. Identify, designate, and protect buildings,
districts, and sites of historic importance within San Jacinto.
Policy RM-3.7: Funding. Identify funding programs to assist private property owners in
the preservation of historic resources.
Action RM-3a: Continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to
sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Action RM-3c: For all development proposals within areas with the potential to contain
prehistoric/historic resources, the City shall require a study to be conducted by a
professional archaeologist. The objective of the study will be to determine if significant
archaeological resources are potentially present and if the project will significantly impact
these resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be
modified to avoid the impacts, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts.
Mitigation may involve archaeological investigation and resources recovery.
Action RM-3d: For projects that involve ground disturbing activities on native soil, prior
Findings
Page 54 of 266
to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall enter a Treatment and Disposition
Agreement (TDA) with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to address treatment and
disposition of archaeological/cultural resources and human remains associated with
Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians that may be uncovered or otherwise discovered during
construction of the project. The TDA may establish provisions for tribal monitors.
Following execution of the TDA by the developer and Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians,
the TDA will be incorporated by reference into the grading permit.
Action RM-3e: The City shall require an assessment of the potential for development
proposals to significantly impact paleontological resources pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. If the project involves earthworks, the City may
require a study conducted by a professional paleontologist to determine if paleontological
assets are present, and if the project will significantly impact the resources. If significant
impacts are identified, the City may require the pr oject to be modified to avoid impacting
the paleontological materials, require monitoring of rock units with high potential to
contain significant nonrenewable paleontologic resources, or require mitigation measures
to mitigate the impacts, such as recovering the paleontological resources for preservation.
Action RM-3f: The City shall make provisions for archeological resources accidentally
discovered during construction for projects where the City has approval authority over the
project. These provisions shall include an immediate evaluation of the find and contingency
funding and time allotment sufficient to allow for the recovery of the archeological
resource or implement measures to avoid disturbing the resource if the archeological
resource is determined to be unique.
Action RM-3o: Conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration
buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural
significance.
H. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
1. Transport, Use, and Disposal of Hazardous Materials
Threshold: Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-1, pages 5.9-15 through 5.9-
21)
Explanation: Implementation of the General Plan Update would accommodate the future
development of both residential and non-residential uses. Increased
development would result in an increase in the routine transport, use, and
storage of hazardous materials in the City, potentially resulting in accidental
releases. Exposure of persons to hazardous materials could also occur
through the operations of future developments associated with the improper
handling of hazardous materials/waste. The use, transportation, and
Findings
Page 55 of 266
disposal of hazardous materials is regulated and monitored by local fire
departments, CUPAs, Cal OSHA, and the DTSC consistent with the
requirements of federal, State, and local regulations and policies. Facilities
that store hazardous materials on-site are required to maintain a Hazardous
Materials Business Plan in accordance with State regulations. In addition to
the requirements associated with federal, State, and local regulations, the
General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address potential
impacts associated with hazardous materials among other issues. Policy PS-
4.1 would ensure that Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) enforces
the Uniform Fire Code relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure
that appropriate regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the
type and amount of hazard being created. Policy PS-4.2 requires that
developers coordinate with the Riverside County Department of Public
Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City
are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe.
Policy PS-4.4 promotes the routing of vehicles carrying potentially
hazardous materials to transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to
the public. Policy PS-4.6 requires appropriate environmental analysis to be
conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer,
in accordance with environmental review requirements. Action PS-4a
requires, as part of the development review process, projects that result in
significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to
address the risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level. Action PS-4b
requires the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials
manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and
proposed businesses and developments to RCFD. Action PS-4d protects the
community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and
ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be
incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address
safety impacts associated with those proposals. Action PS-4f minimizes
public health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage,
and disposal of hazardous materials. Actions PS-4g and PS-4h work to
inform the public about proper hazardous waste disposal and implements
collection services for hazardous waste. These General Plan Update policies
and actions would ensure that potential hazards are identified on a project
site, that development is located in areas where potential exposure to
hazards and hazardous materials can be mitigated to an acceptable level,
and that business operations comply with federal and State regulations
regarding the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.
The General Plan Update also includes policies and actions to ensure that
the City has adequate emergency response plans and measures to respond
in the event of an accidental release of a hazardous substance. Policy PS-
5.1 ensures the provision of sufficient levels of all emergency response
services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to
protect property in the City. Policy PS-5.2 supports the development of
local preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and
Findings
Page 56 of 266
communication agreements for emergency situations. Policy PS-5.5 directs
the City to participate in automatic and mutual aid agreements with adjacent
service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources, facilities, and
support services before, during, and after emergencies. Policy PS-5.7
directs the City to work with RCFD and the Riverside County Sheriff’s
Department (RCSD) to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency
access, protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their effectiveness under
a range of emergency scenarios. Action PS-5b ensures the City regularly
practices implementation of the EOP and updates it regularly. Action PS-5f
ensures the City annually reviews and updates the Emergency Preparedness
Plan under the provision of the State Emergency Management System
format to maximize the efforts of emergency service providers (e.g., fire,
medical, and law enforcement) and minimize human suffering and property
damage during disasters. It also supports high-level multi-jurisdictional
cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management.
Compliance with the requirements of federal, State, and local laws and
regulations regarding the use and storage of hazardous materials would
ensure that risks resulting from the routine transportation, use, storage, or
disposal of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes associated with
implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.4: Truck Routes. Maintain a truck route network that supports the efficient
movement of goods within and beyond the City, while minimizing noise and safety hazards
to the extent feasible.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-4: Hazardous Materials and Waste. A community that is protected from the
potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.
Policy PS-4.1: Regulations. Ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating
to the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and
precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created.
Policy PS-4.2: Cleanup Sites. Require that developers coordinate with the Riverside
County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located
within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public
safe.
Policy PS-4.3: County Plans. Utilize the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste
Management Plan to ensure that local regulation and practices are consistent with the
policy direction and action programs that the County recommends.
Findings
Page 57 of 266
Policy PS-4.4: Transportation. Promote the routing of vehicles carrying potentially
hazardous materials to transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public.
Policy PS-4.5: Household Hazardous Waste. Reduce the per capita production of
household hazardous waste in San Jacinto in concert with the County of Riverside plans
for reducing hazardous waste.
Policy PS-4.6: Proposed Facilities. Require appropriate environmental analysis to be
conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance
with environmental review requirements.
Policy PS-4.7: Emergency Response. Work with RCFD and other responding agencies to
ensure that emergency personnel respond safely and effectively to a hazardous materials
incident in the city.
Policy PS-4.8: Public Education. Coordinate with the City’s waste service provider(s)
and the County of Riverside to increase public awareness about proper disposal related to
household hazardous waste and inform the San Jacinto community regarding relevant
services and programs to address issues related to hazardous waste and materials.
Action PS-4a: As part of the development review process, require projects that result in
significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the
risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level.
Action PS-4b: Require the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials
manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses
and developments to RCFD.
Action PS-4c: Promote off-site hazardous materials and/or electronic waste drop-off.
Action PS-4d: Protect the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous
materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be
incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts
associated with those proposals.
Action PS-4e: Continue to monitor regulations governing the use of pesticides and work
with the County Agricultural Commissioner to promote the responsible use of pesticides.
Action PS-4f: Minimize public health risks and environmental risks from the use,
transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.
Action PS-4g: Continue to work with the County of Riverside Environmental Health
Department to implement and advertise the Household Hazardous Waste Collection
Program to protect residents from dangers resulting from the use, transport, and disposal
of hazardous materials used in the home. Provide informational materials at public
locations and links on the City’s website about the County’s Household Hazardous Waste
Collection program, the County’s Antifreeze, Batteries, Oil, and Paint (ABOP) program,
collection facilities, drop-off centers, and the 24-hour Household Hazardous Waste hotline.
Findings
Page 58 of 266
Action PS-4h: Continue to work with the County of Riverside’s Environmental Health
Department to implement the Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG)
program, which is a hazardous waste pick-up disposal service for eligible, businesses/non-
profit organizations in the County of Riverside. This program provides an affordable way
to legally dispose of this waste. Provide informational materials at public locations and
links on the City’s website about the County’s CESQG program.
Action PS-4i: Amend the Municipal Code to require that, prior to issuance of any grading
or building permit (whichever occurs first) for a project on a site identified on any list of
hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, a formal
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM
Standard Practice E 1527-05 or the Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiry
(AAI) and submitted to the City’s Community Development Department. The Phase I ESA
shall identify specific Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), which may require
further sampling/remedial activities by a qualified Hazardous Materials Specialist with
Phase II/site characterization experience prior to demolition, and/or construction. The
Hazardous Materials Specialist shall identify proper remedial activities appropriate to the
hazardous material(s) found (e.g., removal and disposal; bio-remediation; pump and treat;
soil vapor extraction, and in situ oxidation), as necessary.
Goal PS-5: Emergency Operations. A community that is highly prepared and equipped
to handle emergency situations, in order to minimize loss of life, injury, property damage,
and disruption of vital services.
Policy PS-5.1: Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency
response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect
property in the City.
Policy PS-5.2: Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local
preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements
for emergency situations.
Policy PS-5.3: Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to ensure the
resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of
critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery.
Policy PS-5.4: Local Coordination. Coordinate with local key stakeholders (officials,
schools, businesses, and organizations) within the community to make them aware of their
role in the emergency plan and the necessary requirements in case of emergency.
Policy PS-5.5: Automatic and Mutual Aid. Participate in automatic and mutual aid
agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources,
facilities, and support services before, during, and after emergencies.
Policy PS-5.6: Communications. Evaluate the potential to utilize a comprehensive
emergency communication system that allows for efficient connection in case of
emergency.
Findings
Page 59 of 266
Policy PS-5.7: Emergency Evacuation Routes and Access. Work with RCFD and RCSD
to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation
routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.
Policy PS-5.8: Emergency Shelters. Periodically coordinate with emergency shelter
providers to ensure that necessary equipment supplies are available in case of emergency.
Policy PS-5.9: Disaster Recovery. Work with emergency service providers to implement
post-disaster recovery plans to return public services to a state of normalcy, address
ongoing hazard-specific mitigations, and assist community members in recovering from
disasters.
Policy PS-5.11: Community Training Programs. Support community-based emergency
training programs as a valuable asset to the community.
Policy PS-5.12: Public Education. Educate residents and businesses through programs
and outreach materials on hazards pertaining to San Jacinto and appropriate actions to
safeguard life and property during and immediately after emergencies.
Policy PS-5.13: School Safety. Coordinate with local schools related to their programs
and practices regarding emergency preparedness.
Action PS-5a: Coordinate with the County of Riverside to keep the Multi-Jurisdictional
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan up to date.
Action PS-5b: Regularly practice implementation of the City’s Emergency Operations
Plan and update it regularly.
Action PS-5c: Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that
must be coordinated with City procedures.
Action PS-5f: Annually review and update the Emergency Preparedness Plan under the
provision of the State Emergency Management System format to maximize the efforts of
emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical, and law enforcement) and minimize
human suffering and property damage during disasters. Support high-level multi-
jurisdictional cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management.
Action PS-5g: Coordinate with local agencies and organizations to develop and distribute
informational brochures and give presentations to civic groups and local schools to educate
residents and businesses about appropriate actions to take during an emergency situation.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-6.1: Provision of Police and Fire Services. Encourage the Riverside County
Sheriff’s Department and the Riverside County Fire Department to maintain adequate staff
and equipment to provide efficient, high quality, and responsive public safety services to
the San Jacinto community.
Findings
Page 60 of 266
Action RM-6c: In cooperation with the school districts, police and fire departments, and
local, state, and federal emergency management agencies, implement an Emergency
Operation Center (EOC) to respond to and manage disasters. Provide annual training for
City staff in emergency management so that when they are called into action, they will be
able to distribute information and resources to the public effectively.
Policy RM-10.3: Hazardous Waste. Promote the proper disposal of hazardous waste,
including paint, tires, medications, medical sharps, infectious waste, asbestos waste,
construction waste, and electronic waste, through education, monitoring, and enforcement
of proper use, storage, handling, and disposal.
Action RM-10a: On an ongoing basis and in compliance with State law, ensure solid waste
collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and
construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and
recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are
consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan.
Action RM-10c: Encourage the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of
hazardous materials, including the following:
Increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside
recycling programs;
Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper,
cardboard, and plastics;
Reduce yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass
recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques; and
Encourage local businesses to provide electronic waste (e-waste) drop-off services
and encourage residents and businesses to properly dispose of, or recycle, e-waste.
2. Hazardous Materials Release
Threshold: Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-2, pages 5.9-21 through 5.9-
28)
Explanation: Short-Term Construction-Related Accidental Release of Hazardous
Materials
The General Plan Update would enable development of new residential,
commercial, industrial, and public uses. Construction activities associated
with new development could result in upset and/or accident conditions
Findings
Page 61 of 266
involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Future
development accommodated through implementation of the General Plan
Update could involve the demolition of existing structures and buildings as
areas within the City are redeveloped. The presence of lead-based paint,
asbestos-containing materials (ACM), and/or other contaminants are likely
present in some structures. All demolition that could result in the release of
ACMs or lead-based paint would be conducted according to federal and
State regulations. In accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403, if ACM
material is found, abatement of asbestos would be required prior to any
demolition activities. If paint is separated from building materials
(chemically or physically) during demolition of the structures, the paint
waste would be required to be evaluated independently from the building
material by a qualified Environmental Professional in accordance with
California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 1532.1. If lead-based paint
is found, abatement would be required to be completed by a qualified Lead
Specialist prior to any demolition activities. Compliance with existing
regulations related to ACM and lead-based paint would reduce potential
impacts to a less than significant level.
Future development accommodated through implementation of the General
Plan Update could involve grading and excavation activities which could
expose construction workers and the public to previously unknown
hazardous substances present in the soil or groundwater. The public could
also be exposed to hazardous materials if new development or
redevelopment were to be located on a current or historical hazardous
material site. Future development associated with implementation of the
General Plan Update would be reviewed at the project-level to determine
whether any development sites are listed on a hazardous materials site. Any
development activities that may occur on documented hazardous materials
sites would be required to undergo remediation and cleanup under the
supervision of the regulatory agencies, such as DTSC and the Santa Ana
RWQCB. In addition to the requirements associated with federal, State, and
local regulations, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to
address potential impacts associated with potentially contaminated sites.
Policy PS-4.1 would ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code
relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate
regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the type and amount
of hazard being created. Policy PS-4.2 requires that developers coordinate
with the Riverside County Department of Public Health to confirm that
hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City are remediated by the
property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe. Policy PS-4.4
promotes the routing of vehicles carrying potentially hazardous materials to
transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public. Policy PS-
4.6 requires appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted for any
proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance
with environmental review requirements. Action PS-4a requires, as part of
Findings
Page 62 of 266
the development review process, projects that result in significant risks
associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the risks
and reduce the risks to an acceptable level. Action PS-4f minimizes public
health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage, and
disposal of hazardous materials. Actions PS-4g and PS-4h work to inform
the public about proper hazardous waste disposal and implements collection
services for hazardous waste. Compliance with General Plan Update goals,
policies, and actions, and existing regulations would reduce potential
impacts involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment
as a result of on-site contamination to a less than significant level.
Long-Term Operations-Related Accidental Release of Hazardous Materials
Long-term operation activities associated with new development could
result in upset and/or accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment. The transport, storage, and handling of
hazardous materials by developers, contractors, business owners, and others
are required to comply with federal, State, and local regulations during
project construction and operation. Facilities that use hazardous materials
are required to obtain permits from the EPA under the RCRA, which gives
the EPA the authority to control the generation, transportation, treatment,
storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. Additionally, the hazardous
materials regulations included in federal law govern the transportation of
hazardous materials. Locally, the Riverside County Department of
Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Branch is the CUPA for
Riverside County and is responsible for consolidating, coordinating, and
making consistent the administrative requirements, permits, inspections,
and enforcement activities of state standards regarding the transportation,
use, and disposal of hazardous materials in Riverside County, including the
Study Area. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to
address potential accidental exposure of individuals as a consequence of
unknown existing environmental contaminants. Action PS-4b requires the
submittal of information regarding hazardous materials manufacturing,
storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses
and developments to RCFD. Action PS-4d protects the community from
hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and ground and air
transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be incorporated into new
development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts
associated with those proposals. Compliance with all applicable federal,
State, and local laws related to the transport, storage, and handling of
hazardous materials would reduce the likelihood and severity of accidents,
and impacts involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment would be less than significant.
Findings
Page 63 of 266
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.4: Truck Routes. Maintain a truck route network that supports the efficient
movement of goods within and beyond the City, while minimizing noise and safety hazards
to the extent feasible.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-4: Hazardous Materials and Waste. A community that is protected from the
potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.
Policy PS-4.1: Regulations. Ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to
the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and
precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created.
Policy PS-4.2: Cleanup Sites. Require that developers coordinate with the Riverside
County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located
within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that ke eps the public
safe.
Policy PS-4.3: County Plans. Utilize the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste
Management Plan to ensure that local regulation and practices are consistent with the
policy direction and action programs that the County recommends.
Policy PS-4.4: Transportation. Promote the routing of vehicles carrying potentially
hazardous materials to transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public.
Policy PS-4.5: Household Hazardous Waste. Reduce the per capita production of
household hazardous waste in San Jacinto in concert with the County of Riverside plans
for reducing hazardous waste.
Policy PS-4.6: Proposed Facilities. Require appropriate environmental analysis to be
conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance
with environmental review requirements.
Policy PS-4.8: Public Education. Coordinate with the City’s waste service provider(s) and
the County of Riverside to increase public awareness about proper disposal related to
household hazardous waste and inform the San Jacinto community regarding relevant
services and programs to address issues related to hazardous waste and materials.
Action PS-4a: As part of the development review process, require projects that result in
significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the
risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level.
Findings
Page 64 of 266
Action PS-4b: Require the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials
manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses
and developments to RCFD.
Action PS-4c: Promote off-site hazardous materials and/or electronic waste drop-off.
Action PS-4d: Protect the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous
materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be
incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts
associated with those proposals.
Action PS-4e: Continue to monitor regulations governing the use of pesticides and work
with the County Agricultural Commissioner to promote the responsible use of pesticides.
Action PS-4f: Minimize public health risks and environmental risks from the use,
transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.
Action PS-4g: Continue to work with the County of Riverside Environmental Health
Department to implement and advertise the Household Hazardous Waste Collection
Program to protect residents from dangers resulting from the use, transport, and disposal
of hazardous materials used in the home. Provide informational materials at public
locations and links on the City’s website about the County’s Household Hazardous Waste
Collection program, the County’s Antifreeze, Batteries, Oil, and Paint (ABOP) program,
collection facilities, drop-off centers, and the 24-hour Household Hazardous Waste hotline.
Action PS-4h: Continue to work with the County of Riverside’s Environmental Health
Department to implement the Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG)
program, which is a hazardous waste pick-up disposal service for eligible, businesses/non-
profit organizations in the County of Riverside. This program provides an affordable way
to legally dispose of this waste. Provide informational materials at public locations and
links on the City’s website about the County’s CESQG program.
Action PS-4i: Amend the Municipal Code to require that, prior to issuance of any grading
or building permit (whichever occurs first) for a project on a site identified on any list of
hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, a formal
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM
Standard Practice E 1527-05 or the Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiry
(AAI) and submitted to the City’s Community Development Department. The Phase I ESA
shall identify specific Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), which may require
further sampling/remedial activities by a qualified Hazardous Materials Specialist with
Phase II/site characterization experience prior to demolition, and/or construction. The
Hazardous Materials Specialist shall identify proper remedial activities appropriate to the
hazardous material(s) found (e.g., removal and disposal; bio-remediation; pump and treat;
soil vapor extraction, and in situ oxidation), as necessary.
Findings
Page 65 of 266
Goal PS-5: Emergency Operations. A community that is highly prepared and equipped
to handle emergency situations, in order to minimize loss of life, injury, property damage,
and disruption of vital services.
Policy PS-5.1: Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency
response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect
property in the City.
Policy PS-5.2: Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local
preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements
for emergency situations.
Policy PS-5.3: Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to ensure the
resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of
critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery.
Policy PS-5.4: Local Coordination. Coordinate with local key stakeholders (officials,
schools, businesses, and organizations) within the community to make them aware of their
role in the emergency plan and the necessary requirements in case of emergency.
Policy PS-5.5: Automatic and Mutual Aid. Participate in automatic and mutual aid
agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources,
facilities, and support services before, during, and after emergencies.
Policy PS-5.6: Communications. Evaluate the potential to utilize a comprehensive
emergency communication system that allows for efficient connection in case of
emergency.
Policy PS-5.7: Emergency Evacuation Routes and Access. Work with RCFD and RCSD
to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation
routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.
Policy PS-5.8: Emergency Shelters. Periodically coordinate with emergency shelter
providers to ensure that necessary equipment supplies are available in case of emergency.
Policy PS-5.9: Disaster Recovery. Work with emergency service providers to implement
post-disaster recovery plans to return public services to a state of normalcy, address
ongoing hazard-specific mitigations, and assist community members in recovering from
disasters.
Policy PS-5.11: Community Training Programs. Support community-based emergency
training programs as a valuable asset to the community.
Policy PS-5.12: Public Education. Educate residents and businesses through programs
and outreach materials on hazards pertaining to San Jacinto and appropriate actions to
safeguard life and property during and immediately after emergencies.
Findings
Page 66 of 266
Policy PS-5.13: School Safety. Coordinate with local schools related to their programs
and practices regarding emergency preparedness.
Action PS-5a: Coordinate with the County of Riverside to keep the Multi-Jurisdictional
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan up to date.
Action PS-5b: Regularly practice implementation of the City’s Emergency Operations
Plan and update it regularly.
Action PS-5c: Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that
must be coordinated with City procedures.
Action PS-5f: Annually review and update the Emergency Preparedness Plan under the
provision of the State Emergency Management System format to maximize the efforts of
emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical, and law enforcement) and minimize
human suffering and property damage during disasters. Support high-level multi-
jurisdictional cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management.
Action PS-5g: Coordinate with local agencies and organizations to develop and distribute
informational brochures and give presentations to civic groups and local schools to educate
residents and businesses about appropriate actions to take during an emergency situation.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-6.1: Provision of Police and Fire Services. Encourage the Riverside County
Sheriff’s Department and the Riverside County Fire Department to maintain adequate staff
and equipment to provide efficient, high quality, and responsive public safety services to
the San Jacinto community.
Action RM-6c: In cooperation with the school districts, police and fire departments, and
local, state, and federal emergency management agencies, implement an Emergency
Operation Center (EOC) to respond to and manage disasters. Provide annual training for
City staff in emergency management so that when they are called into action, they will be
able to distribute information and resources to the public effectively.
Policy RM-10.3: Hazardous Waste. Promote the proper disposal of hazardous waste,
including paint, tires, medications, medical sharps, infectious waste, asbestos waste,
construction waste, and electronic waste, through education, monitoring, and enforcement
of proper use, storage, handling, and disposal.
Action RM-10a: On an ongoing basis and in compliance with State law, ensure solid waste
collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and
construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and
recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are
consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan.
Action RM-10c: Encourage the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of
hazardous materials, including the following:
Findings
Page 67 of 266
Increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside
recycling programs;
Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper,
cardboard, and plastics;
Reduce yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass
recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques; and
Encourage local businesses to provide electronic waste (e-waste) drop-off services
and encourage residents and businesses to properly dispose of, or recycle, e-waste.
3. Hazards Near Schools
Threshold: Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an
existing or proposed school?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-3, pages 5.9-28 through 5.9-
31)
Explanation: Future development within the Study Area could potentially emit or handle
hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school. In addition to the requirements associated with federal, State, and
local regulations, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to
address potential impacts associated with hazardous materials. Policy PS-
4.1 would ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to the
use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are
followed, and precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being
created. Policy PS-4.2 requires that developers coordinate with the
Riverside County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous
waste cleanup sites located within the City are remediated by the property
owner in a manner that keeps the public safe. Policy PS-4.4 promotes the
routing of vehicles carrying potentially hazardous materials to
transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public. Policy PS-
4.6 requires appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted for any
proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance
with environmental review requirements. Action PS-4a requires, as part of
the development review process, projects that result in significant risks
associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the risks
and reduce the risks to an acceptable level. Action PS-4b requires the
submittal of information regarding hazardous materials manufacturing,
storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses
and developments to RCFD. Action PS-4d protects the community from
hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and ground and air
transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be incorporated into new
development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts
Findings
Page 68 of 266
associated with those proposals. Action PS-4f minimizes public health risks
and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage, and disposal of
hazardous materials. Actions PS-4g and PS-4h work to inform the public
about proper hazardous waste disposal and implements collection services
for hazardous waste. Implementation of the safety procedures and
regulations mandated by applicable federal, State, and local laws and the
General Plan Update policies and actions would ensure that potential risks
resulting from the routine transportation, use, storage, or disposal of
hazardous materials or hazardous wastes in proximity to a school associated
with implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than
significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.4: Truck Routes. Maintain a truck route network that supports the efficient
movement of goods within and beyond the City, while minimizing noise and safety hazards
to the extent feasible.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-4: Hazardous Materials and Waste. A community that is protected from the
potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.
Policy PS-4.1: Regulations. Ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to
the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and
precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created.
Policy PS-4.2: Cleanup Sites. Require that developers coordinate with the Riverside
County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located
within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public
safe.
Policy PS-4.3: County Plans. Utilize the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste
Management Plan to ensure that local regulation and practices are consistent with the
policy direction and action programs that the County recommends.
Policy PS-4.4: Transportation. Promote the routing of vehicles carrying potentially
hazardous materials to transportation corridors posing the minimum risk to the public.
Policy PS-4.5: Household Hazardous Waste. Reduce the per capita production of
household hazardous waste in San Jacinto in concert with the County of Riverside plans
for reducing hazardous waste.
Policy PS-4.6: Proposed Facilities. Require appropriate environmental analysis to be
conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance
with environmental review requirements.
Findings
Page 69 of 266
Policy PS-4.8: Public Education. Coordinate with the City’s waste service provider(s) and
the County of Riverside to increase public awareness about proper disposal related to
household hazardous waste and inform the San Jacinto community regarding relevant
services and programs to address issues related to hazardous waste and materials.
Action PS-4a: As part of the development review process, require projects that result in
significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the
risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level.
Action PS-4b: Require the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials
manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses
and developments to RCFD.
Action PS-4c: Promote off-site hazardous materials and/or electronic waste drop-off.
Action PS-4d: Protect the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous
materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be
incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts
associated with those proposals.
Action PS-4e: Continue to monitor regulations governing the use of pesticides and work
with the County Agricultural Commissioner to promote the responsible use of pesticides.
Action PS-4f: Minimize public health risks and environmental risks from the use,
transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.
Action PS-4g: Continue to work with the County of Riverside Environmental Health
Department to implement and advertise the Household Hazardous Waste Collection
Program to protect residents from dangers resulting from the use, transport, and disposal
of hazardous materials used in the home. Provide informational materials at public
locations and links on the City’s website about the County’s Household Hazardous Waste
Collection program, the County’s Antifreeze, Batteries, Oil, and Paint (ABOP) program,
collection facilities, drop-off centers, and the 24-hour Household Hazardous Waste hotline.
Action PS-4h: Continue to work with the County of Riverside’s Environmental Health
Department to implement the Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG)
program, which is a hazardous waste pick-up disposal service for eligible, businesses/non-
profit organizations in the County of Riverside. This program provides an affordable way
to legally dispose of this waste. Provide informational materials at public locations and
links on the City’s website about the County’s CESQG program.
Action PS-4i: Amend the Municipal Code to require that, prior to issuance of any grading
or building permit (whichever occurs first) for a project on a site identified on any list of
hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, a formal
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM
Standard Practice E 1527-05 or the Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiry
(AAI) and submitted to the City’s Community Development Department. The Phase I ESA
Findings
Page 70 of 266
shall identify specific Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), which may require
further sampling/remedial activities by a qualified Hazardous Materials Specialist with
Phase II/site characterization experience prior to demolition, and/or construction. The
Hazardous Materials Specialist shall identify proper remedial activities appropriate to the
hazardous material(s) found (e.g., removal and disposal; bio-remediation; pump and treat;
soil vapor extraction, and in situ oxidation), as necessary.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-10.3: Hazardous Waste. Promote the proper disposal of hazardous waste,
including paint, tires, medications, medical sharps, infectious waste, asbestos waste,
construction waste, and electronic waste, through education, monitoring, and enforcement
of proper use, storage, handling, and disposal.
Action RM-10a: On an ongoing basis and in compliance with State law, ensure solid waste
collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and
construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and
recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are
consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan.
Action RM-10c: Encourage the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of
hazardous materials, including the following:
Increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside
recycling programs;
Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper,
cardboard, and plastics;
Reduce yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass
recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques; and
Encourage local businesses to provide electronic waste (e-waste) drop-off services
and encourage residents and businesses to properly dispose of, or recycle, e-waste.
4. Waste Sites
Threshold: Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-4, pages 5.9-32 through 5.9-
33)
Explanation: There are two site locations with a “certified” status listed on the Cortese
list, compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Future
Findings
Page 71 of 266
development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update
would be evaluated at the project-level to determine whether any
development sites are listed on a hazardous materials site. Any development
activities occurring on documented hazardous materials sites would be
required to undergo remediation and cleanup under the supervision of the
DTSC and the Santa Ana RWQCB prior to construction. The General Plan
Update includes policies and actions to address potential impacts associated
with hazardous materials. Policy PS-4.1 would ensure that RCFD enforces
the Uniform Fire Code relating to the use of hazardous materials and ensure
that appropriate regulations are followed, and precautions are taken for the
type and amount of hazard being created. Policy PS-4.2 requires that
developers coordinate with the Riverside County Department of Public
Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located within the City
are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public safe.
Policy PS-4.3 utilizes the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste
Management Plan to ensure that local regulation and practices are consistent
with the policy direction and action programs that the County recommends.
Policy PS-4.6 requires appropriate environmental analysis to be conducted
for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in
accordance with environmental review requirements. Action PS-4a
requires, as part of the development review process, projects that result in
significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to
address the risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level. Action PS-4b
requires the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials
manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and
proposed businesses and developments to RCFD. Action PS-4d protects the
community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous materials, and
ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be
incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address
safety impacts associated with those proposals. Action PS-4f minimizes
public health risks and environmental risks from the use, transport, storage,
and disposal of hazardous materials. Compliance with General Plan Update
goals, policies, and actions, and existing regulations would reduce potential
impacts involving the hazardous materials sites.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-4: Hazardous Materials and Waste. A community that is protected from the
potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.
Policy PS-4.1: Regulations. Ensure that RCFD enforces the Uniform Fire Code relating to
the use of hazardous materials and ensure that appropriate regulations are followed, and
precautions are taken for the type and amount of hazard being created.
Policy PS-4.2: Cleanup Sites. Require that developers coordinate with the Riverside
Findings
Page 72 of 266
County Department of Public Health to confirm that hazardous waste cleanup sites located
within the City are remediated by the property owner in a manner that keeps the public
safe.
Policy PS-4.3: County Plans. Utilize the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste
Management Plan to ensure that local regulation and practices are consistent with the
policy direction and action programs that the County recommends.
Policy PS-4.6: Proposed Facilities. Require appropriate environmental analysis to be
conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment or transfer, in accordance
with environmental review requirements.
Action PS-4a: As part of the development review process, require projects that result in
significant risks associated with hazardous materials to include measures to address the
risks and reduce the risks to an acceptable level.
Action PS-4b: Require the submittal of information regarding hazardous materials
manufacturing, storage, use, transport, and/or disposal by existing and proposed businesses
and developments to RCFD.
Action PS-4d: Protect the community from hazards related to air pollution, hazardous
materials, and ground and air transportation by requiring feasible mitigation to be
incorporated into new development and redevelopment proposals to address safety impacts
associated with those proposals.
Action PS-4f: Minimize public health risks and environmental risks from the use,
transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials.
Action PS-4i: Amend the Municipal Code to require that, prior to issuance of any grading
or building permit (whichever occurs first) for a project on a site identified on any list of
hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, a formal
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM
Standard Practice E 1527-05 or the Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiry
(AAI) and submitted to the City’s Community Development Department. The Phase I ESA
shall identify specific Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), which may require
further sampling/remedial activities by a qualified Hazardous Materials Specialist with
Phase II/site characterization experience prior to demolition, and/or construction. The
Hazardous Materials Specialist shall identify proper remedial activities appropriate to the
hazardous material(s) found (e.g., removal and disposal; bio-remediation; pump and treat;
soil vapor extraction, and in situ oxidation), as necessary.
5. Public Airports
Threshold: For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in the project area?
Findings
Page 73 of 266
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-5, pages 5.9-34)
Explanation: There are no airports within the Study Area. The closest airport to the Study
Area is the Hemet-Ryan Airport, located approximately seven miles south
of the City of San Jacinto. According to the ALUCP, San Jacinto is not
located within an Airport Influence Area. Because the Study Area is not
within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public use airport,
impacts with regard to safety hazards to people residing or working in the
Study Area would be less than significant.
6. Emergency Plans
Threshold: Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-6, pages 5.9-34 through 5.9-
38)
Explanation: The General Plan Update would allow a variety of new development,
including residential, commercial, industrial, and public projects, which
would result in increased jobs and population in the Study Area. Road and
infrastructure improvements would occur to accommodate the new growth.
Implementation of the General Plan Update would not impair or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan. The Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) provides
fire and emergency response service to the City of San Jacinto. The RCFD
Strategic Plan 2009-2029 outlines goals and strategies for fire protection
services throughout the Riverside County OA, including facility needs and
improvements, training requirements, and disaster preparedness. The City’s
EOP addresses the planned response to extraordinary situations associated
with natural disasters and/or human caused incidents. The EOP focuses on
coordinating mutual aid and provides an overview of the operational
concepts relating to various emergency situations, identifies components of
the emergency response, and describes the overall responsibilities of the
Riverside County OA for supporting OA Members in protecting life and
property. The EOP does not provide a specific evacuation route map, as
evacuation measures would be implemented based on the specific
emergency and area affected. The General Plan Update would not require
or result in revisions to the RCFD Strategic Plan or adopted EOP.
The City prepared an analysis consistent with SB 99 to identify residential
developments in hazard areas that do not have at least two emergency
evacuation routes. The analysis found that out of 4,990 unique land parcels
identified as residential and located within an identified hazard zone, the
vast majority (approximately 77 percent) of the parcels have multiple exit
points with access to multiple arterials, and another 13 percent of the parcels
have multiple exit points with access to a single arterial, a loop road.
Findings
Page 74 of 266
Approximately 10 percent of the developed parcels have one exit point with
access directly onto a single arterial. Parcels with one exit point with access
directly onto a single arterial are widespread throughout the Study Area, and
tend to be condominium, apartment, and mobile home communities, or
large rural residential parcels. There are no parcels in the Study Area
described as having “one exit point with some distance to a single arterial.”
The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address
emergency evacuation routes. Specifically, Policy PS-5.7 directs the City to
work with RCFD and RCSD to maintain, update, and regularly exercise
emergency access, protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their
effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.
The General Plan Update does not include any site-specific development.
However, future development would be designed, constructed, and
maintained in accordance with applicable standards, including vehicular
access to ensure that adequate emergency access and evacuation would be
maintained. Construction activities that may temporarily restrict vehicular
traffic would be required to implement appropriate measures to facilitate
the passage of persons and vehicles through/around any required road
closures. The General Plan Update identifies major arterials as the primary
routes for evacuation; however, evacuation routes would depend upon the
emergency event and area affected. The General Plan Update includes
policies and actions to address emergency response and evacuation. Action
PS-2a implements the EOP to ensure the most effective allocation of
resources for protection of people and property in time of an emergency,
and update it as needed. Policy PS-5.1 ensures the provision of sufficient
levels of all emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and
welfare of all persons and to protect property in the City. Policy PS-5.2
supports the development of local preparedness plans and multi-
jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements for emergency
situations. Policy PS-5.5 directs the City to participate in automatic and
mutual aid agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient
and adequate resources, facilities, and support services before, during, and
after emergencies. Policy PS-5.7 directs the City to work with RCFD and
RCSD to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access,
protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their effectiveness under a range
of emergency scenarios. Action PS-5b ensures the City regularly practices
implementation of the EOP and updates it regularly. Action PS-5f ensures
the City annually reviews and updates the Emergency Preparedness Plan
under the provision of the State Emergency Management System format to
maximize the efforts of emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical,
and law enforcement) and minimize human suffering and property damage
during disasters. It also supports high-level multi-jurisdictional cooperation
and communication for emergency planning and management. Action RM-
6c implements an Emergency Operation Center to respond to and manage
disasters in cooperation with the school districts, police and fire
Findings
Page 75 of 266
departments, and local, state, and federal emergency management agencies.
It would also provide annual training for City staff in emergency
management so that when they are called into action, they will be able to
distribute information and resources to the public effectively.
Primary access to all major roads would be maintained during construction
of future developments within the Study Area. As part of the site plan and
design review process (SJDC Chapter 17.630), future development projects
would be reviewed for adequate infrastructure and access as well as
consistency with adopted emergency and evacuation plans among many
other environmental issues in order to ensure the safety of City residents
and the physical environment. Therefore, impacts associated with adopted
emergency response or evacuation plans would be less than significant
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-2a: Implement the City’s Emergency Operations Plan to ensure the most
effective allocation of resources for protection of people and property in time of an
emergency, and update it as needed.
Goal PS-4: Hazardous Materials and Waste. A community that is protected from the
potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.
Policy PS-4.7: Emergency Response. Work with RCFD and other responding agencies to
ensure that emergency personnel respond safely and effectively to a hazardous materials
incident in the city.
Goal PS-5: Emergency Operations. A community that is highly prepared and equipped
to handle emergency situations, in order to minimize loss of life, injury, property damage,
and disruption of vital services.
Policy PS-5.1: Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency
response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect
property in the City.
Policy PS-5.2: Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local
preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements
for emergency situations.
Policy PS-5.3: Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to ensure the
resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of
critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery.
Policy PS-5.4: Local Coordination. Coordinate with local key stakeholders (officials,
schools, businesses, and organizations) within the community to make them aware of their
role in the emergency plan and the necessary requirements in case of emergency.
Findings
Page 76 of 266
Policy PS-5.5: Automatic and Mutual Aid. Participate in automatic and mutual aid
agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources,
facilities, and support services before, during, and after emergencies.
Policy PS-5.6: Communications. Evaluate the potential to utilize a comprehensive
emergency communication system that allows for efficient connection in case of
emergency.
Policy PS-5.7: Emergency Evacuation Routes and Access. Work with RCFD and RCSD
to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation
routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.
Policy PS-5.8: Emergency Shelters. Periodically coordinate with emergency shelter
providers to ensure that necessary equipment supplies are available in case of emergency.
Policy PS-5.9: Disaster Recovery. Work with emergency service providers to implement
post-disaster recovery plans to return public services to a state of normalcy, address
ongoing hazard-specific mitigations, and assist community members in recovering from
disasters.
Policy PS-5.11: Community Training Programs. Support community-based emergency
training programs as a valuable asset to the community.
Policy PS-5.12: Public Education. Educate residents and businesses through programs
and outreach materials on hazards pertaining to San Jacinto and appropriate actions to
safeguard life and property during and immediately after emergencies.
Policy PS-5.13: School Safety. Coordinate with local schools related to their programs
and practices regarding emergency preparedness.
Action PS-5a: Coordinate with the County of Riverside to keep the Multi-Jurisdictional
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan up to date.
Action PS-5b: Regularly practice implementation of the City’s Emergency Operations
Plan and update it regularly.
Action PS-5c: Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that
must be coordinated with City procedures.
Action PS-5f: Annually review and update the Emergency Preparedness Plan under the
provision of the State Emergency Management System format to maximize the efforts of
emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical, and law enforcement) and minimize
human suffering and property damage during disasters. Support high-level multi-
jurisdictional cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management.
Action PS-5g: Coordinate with local agencies and organizations to develop and distribute
informational brochures and give presentations to civic groups and local schools to educate
residents and businesses about appropriate actions to take during an emergency situation.
Findings
Page 77 of 266
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-6.1: Provision of Police and Fire Services. Encourage the Riverside County
Sheriff’s Department and the Riverside County Fire Department to maintain adequate staff
and equipment to provide efficient, high quality, and responsive public safety services to
the San Jacinto community.
Action RM-6c: In cooperation with the school districts, police and fire departments, and
local, state, and federal emergency management agencies, implement an Emergency
Operation Center (EOC) to respond to and manage disasters. Provide annual training for
City staff in emergency management so that when they are called into action, they will be
able to distribute information and resources to the public effectively.
7. Wildland Fires
Threshold: Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly,
to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HAZ-7, pages 5.9-38 through 5.9-
42)
Explanation: The Study Area and surrounding area contain designated Fire Hazard
Severity Zones (FHSZ) in both Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) and State
Responsibility Areas (SRA). The open space area on the western boundary
of the City is designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone
(VHFHSZ) under local responsibility. In addition, a mountainous
undeveloped area in the southeast portion of the City, known as Park Hill,
is also identified as a VHFHSZ under local responsibility. There are no SRA
found within City limits; however, there are SRA within the eastern portion
of the Study Area and pockets of SRA to the east and west of City limits.
Some of these areas are within the VHFHSZ in an SRA.
All new construction is required to adhere to standards and requirements set
forth in the San Jacinto Municipal Code, which incorporates the California
Fire Code. In accordance with SJDC Section 17.300.050, all development
located in or adjacent to wildfire prone areas would be required to prepare
a fire management plan, which would be reviewed by RCFD and may
include additional fire protection measures (e.g., landscape or open space
buffers), maintenance programs for weed and vegetation abatement,
installation of fire-resistant plants, and the use of noncombustible building
materials. Additionally, special attention would be given to development in
hillside areas in the City per Municipal Code Chapter 15.28. Further, the
General Plan Update Public Safety Element includes goals and policies to
reduce the risk of wildland hazards. Policy PS-2.1 requires that all buildings
and facilities within the City comply with local, State, and federal regulatory
standards such as the California Building and Fire Codes as well as other
applicable fire safety standards. Policy PS-2.2 reduces the risk of fire to the
Findings
Page 78 of 266
community by coordinating emergency preparedness with the RCFD.
Policy PS-2.3 directs the City to work with RCFD to maintain and regularly
update the City’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map for changes in fire hazard
severity zones consistent with changes in hazard designations by CAL
FIRE. Policy PS-2.10 protect communities from unreasonable risk of
wildfire within VHFHSZs through a variety of actions, including:
minimizing new residential development in VHFHSZs when possible;
requiring adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and
emergency vehicle access for new development in VHFHSZs; assessing site
constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to avoid
or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment;
requiring ongoing brush management, fuel management/modification,
defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other project design
features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high wildfire
risk; and working with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction
projects, including community fire breaks and private road and public road
clearance. Policy PS-2.11 considers fire safe design (i.e., fire-resistant
building and site design, materials, and landscaping) for development
within VHFHSZs as part of the development review process. Action PS-2b
mitigates, as feasible, existing non-conforming development to
contemporary fire safe standards where feasible, including road standards
and vegetative hazards. Action PS-2c requires that all new habitable
structures be designed in accordance with the most recent California
Building and Fire Code with local amendments adopted by the City,
including the use of fire sprinklers in residential structures.
Future development allowed under the General Plan Update would be
required to comply with the provisions of federal, State, and local
requirements related to wildland fire hazards, including State fire safety
regulations associated with wildland-urban interfaces, fire-safe building
standards, and defensible space requirements. As future development and
infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project would be
evaluated for potential impacts, specific to the project, associated with
wildland fire hazards as required under CEQA. Therefore, through
compliance with existing federal, State, and local laws and regulations
related to wildland fire hazards and implementation of the General Plan
Update goals, policies, and actions, impact regarding the exposure of people
or structures to significant loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires
would be less than significant
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-2: Fire Safety. A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire
emergencies.
Findings
Page 79 of 266
Policy PS-2.1: Building Fire Codes. Require that all buildings and facilities within San
Jacinto comply with local, state, and federal regulatory standards such as the California
Building and Fire Codes as well as other applicable fire safety standards.
Policy PS-2.2: Fire Protection Services. Reduce the risk of fire to the community by
coordinating emergency preparedness with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD).
Policy PS-2.3: Fire Hazard Identification. Work with RCFD to maintain and regularly
update the City’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map (Figure PS-2) for changes in fire hazard
severity zones consistent with changes in hazard designations by CAL FIRE.
Policy PS-2.5: Grant Funding. Seek grant funding, independently and in collaboration
with regional partners, to mitigate potential wildfire threats to the community and to
implement training workshops and projects related to defensible space and fuel reduction
practices.
Policy PS-2.6: Regional Coordination. Coordinate with the County of Riverside,
neighboring cities, and other fire protection agencies to reduce the potential for wildfire
hazards in the San Jacinto community.
Policy PS-2.7: Interagency Support. Participate in the mutual aid system and automatic
aid agreements to back up and supplement capabilities to respond to emergencies.
Policy PS-2.8: Public Education. Work with RCFD to disseminate educational programs
for residents on fire hazard risks and fire safety measures, such as defensible space and
evacuation routes, with a special focus on at-risk populations.
Policy PS-2.9: Post-fire Treatment. Work with CAL FIRE, United States Forest Service,
United States Geologic Service, and applicable nongovernmental agencies to create a plan
to address post-fire recovery activities and projects that allow burned areas to fully recover
and minimize repetitive losses and further damage.
Policy PS-2.10: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Protect communities from
unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones through the
following actions:
a. Minimize new residential development in very high fire hazard severity zones when
possible.
b. Require adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and emergency
vehicle access for new development in very high fire hazard severity zones.
c. Assess site constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to
avoid or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment.
d. Coordinate with RCFD to identify building and site design methods or other
methods to minimize damage if new structures are proposed to be in very high fire
hazard severity zones on undeveloped land and when rebuilding after a fire.
Findings
Page 80 of 266
e. As part of the RCFD review process, require ongoing brush management, fuel
management/modification, defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other
project design features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high
wildfire risk.
f. Coordinate with the applicable water district to ensure necessary water supply
systems and flow for structural fire suppression are provided and maintained.
g. Work with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction projects, including
community fire breaks and private road and public road clearance.
h. Coordinate with RCFD to define minimum standards for evacuation of residential
areas in very high fire hazard severity zones. If areas with inadequate
access/evacuation routes are identified, develop appropriate mitigation measures,
improvement plans, or education programs to ensure safe evacuation.
Policy PS-2.11: Fire Safe Design. Consider fire safe design (i.e., fire-resistant building
and site design, materials, and landscaping) for development within very high fire hazard
severity zones as part of the development review process.
a. Locate, design and construct development to provide adequate defensibility and
minimize the risk of structural loss from wildland fires.
b. Design development on hillsides and canyons to reduce the increased risk of fires
from topography features (i.e., steep slopes, ridge saddles).
c. Minimize flammable vegetation and implement brush management best practices
in accordance with the Development Code.
d. Install visible home and street addressing and signage.
Policy PS-2.12: Hazard Mitigation Plans. Coordinate with local, state, and federal
agencies to update emergency, evacuation, and hazard mitigation plans, as necessary.
Policy PS-2.13: Essential Public Facilities and Infrastructure. Locate, when feasible,
new essential public facilities and infrastructure outside of very high fire hazard severity
zones, including but not limited to, hospitals and health care facilities, emergency shelters,
emergency command centers, emergency communication facilities, and utilities or identify
construction methods or other methods to minimize damage if these facilities must be
located in very high fire hazard severity zones.
Action PS-2a: Implement the City’s Emergency Operations Plan to ensure the most
effective allocation of resources for protection of people and property in time of an
emergency, and update it as needed.
Action PS-2b: Mitigate, as feasible, existing non-conforming development to
contemporary fire safe standards where feasible, including road standards and vegetative
hazards.
Findings
Page 81 of 266
Action PS-2c: Require that all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the
most recent California Building and Fire Code with local amendments adopted by the City,
including the use of fire sprinklers in residential structures.
Action PS-2d: Participate in Mutual Aid Agreements with neighboring cities and the
Riverside County Operational Area, as required by RCFD.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-6.1: Provision of Police and Fire Services. Encourage the Riverside County
Sheriff’s Department and the Riverside County Fire Department to maintain adequate staff
and equipment to provide efficient, high quality, and responsive public safety services to
the San Jacinto community.
Policy RM-6.2: Department Consultation. Promote coordination between the City of
San Jacinto and public safety services during the review of new development applications
to ensure that adequate attention is being paid to fire and safety concerns during the design
and planning of a project.
Action RM-6f: In cooperation with the Riverside County Fire Department, adopt and
maintain level of service (e.g., response times, call handling) and staffing standards, as well
as a developer fee program for fire services. Review the level of services and funding levels
at budget time, adjusting when necessary to ensure that adequate levels of service and
facilities are provided and maintained. Future developers will contribute funds for fire
services through the adopted developer fees. During the budget and CIP process, reserve
future sites through purchase, eminent domain, dedication, donation, or a combination of
these procedures.
I. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
1. Water Quality Standards
Threshold: Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater
quality?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HWQ-1, pages 5.10-16 through
5.10-20)
Explanation: The General Plan Update sets policies and actions for build-out of the City,
but it does not envision or authorize any specific development project.
Because of this, the site-specific details of potential future development
projects are currently unknown and analysis of potential impacts of such
projects is not feasible and would be speculative. However, grading,
excavation, removal of vegetation cover, and loading activities associated
with future construction activities could temporarily increase runoff,
erosion, and sedimentation. Construction activities also could result in soil
Findings
Page 82 of 266
compaction and wind erosion impacts that could adversely affect soils and
reduce the revegetation potential at construction sites and staging areas.
each future project must include detailed project specific drainage plans that
control storm water runoff and erosion, both during and after construction.
The RWQCB would require a project-specific SWPPP to be prepared for
each future project that disturbs an area one acre or larger. The SWPPPs
would include project-specific best management measures that are designed
to control drainage and erosion.
Pursuant to the Riverside County MS4 NPDES Permit and SJDC Section
17.600.100, qualifying new development and redevelopment projects are
required by the City to prepare a WQMP or similar demonstration of post-
construction BMPs to mitigate downstream impacts to flooding and water
quality. BMPs identified in the WQMP would be required to address site
design, source controls, and treatment controls. Projects not requiring a
WQMP would be required to implement all of the minimum BMPs
approved by the City Engineer. All new development and redevelopment
projects must also be consistent with the Santa Ana River Region DAMP
and would also be required to fulfill any conditions and requirements
established by the City Engineer which are related to the reduction or
elimination of pollutants in stormwater and urban runoff from the project
site. Waters that are listed under Section 303(d) of the CWA are known as
“impaired.” The City does not contain any CWA Section 303(d)-listed
water bodies. The City manages local storm drain facilities and the
RCFCWCD is responsible for regional flood control planning within the
County. Provision of stormwater detention facilities as needed would
reduce runoff rates and peak flows.
General Plan Update Public Safety and Resource Management goals,
policies, and actions aim to enhance stormwater quality and infiltration as
well as ensure development projects are reviewed to identify potential
stormwater and drainage impacts and require development to include
measures to confirm off-site runoff is not increased beyond pre-
development levels. Goal RM-2 aims to protect the City’s water resources.
Policy RM-2.2 protects aquifers and encourages groundwater recharge
within the Basin. Policy RM-2.5 ensures cooperation with local water
agencies to manage stormwater runoff. Policy Action RM-1f would reduce
soil erosion and pollutants in stormwater runoff by ensuring proper
geotechnical and soil management techniques are implemented through the
development review process. Action RM-2a further reduces soil erosion and
pollutants in urban runoff by requiring new development and
redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff through
implementation of BMPs and requiring projects of one acre or more to
complete a SWPPP. Action RM-2b enhances water quality by cooperating
with the RWQCB to develop a plan to assist agricultural operations to
reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters. Actions RM-2g and
Findings
Page 83 of 266
RM-2h reduce potential impacts from septic systems on water sources by
regulating new septic systems and encouraging the conversion from
existing septic systems to sewer. Action RM-9e ensures cooperation with
the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage groundwater
resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable
federal, State and local regulations. Existing regulatory requirements that
manage water quality include requirements to obtain approval from the
RWQCB for NPDES permits, other discharge permits, WQMPs, SWPPPs,
and to implement BMPs. These regulatory requirements are intended to
ensure that water quality does not degrade to levels that would violate water
quality standards. Through implementation of the General Plan Update
policies and actions, implementation of the Municipal Code requirements
identified above, compliance with mandatory federal and State regulations,
and compliance with the existing regulations for the San Jacinto River
Watershed, future development projects associated with implementation of
the General Plan Update would not violate water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or
groundwater quality.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and
soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or
Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State
licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential
geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the
recommendations contained within the survey.
Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water
resources.
Policy RM-2.1: Regional Cooperation. Cooperate with federal, State, and county
governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and
quantity of local and regional groundwater resources.
Policy RM-2.2: Groundwater Management. Protect aquifers within the Basin and
encourage groundwater recharge.
Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively
and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water
conservation strategy.
Policy RM-2.6: Septic Systems. Discourage the use of septic systems to reduce potential
negative impacts to groundwater.
Findings
Page 84 of 266
Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new
development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through
implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of
water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing
development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific
development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with
relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8-
2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).
Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a
plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.
Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the
planning area as well as downstream.
Action RM-2g: During the development review process, the City shall allow new septic
systems only for low density projects if they have met the RWQCB’s minimum lot size
requirement of one-half acre per subsurface disposal system and where sewer connection
is infeasible.
Action RM-2h: Continue to encourage the conversion from existing septic systems to
sewer by limiting the replacement or expansion/repair of existing septic systems as
feasible.
Action RM-9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water
supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.
Specifically, the City should:
During the processing of development proposals, ensure the water districts are
consulted regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and
sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, require
proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the
application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during
construction and development.
Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any
new development.
Require water conservation devices and xeriscape water efficient landscaping in
new public and private development and redevelopment projects.
Action RM-9e: Cooperate with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage
groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable
Findings
Page 85 of 266
federal, State and local regulations.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-1g: During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals,
require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists
and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified,
require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained
within the geologic survey.
Policy PS-3.7: Stormwater Runoff. Encourage new developments that add impervious
surfaces to integrate low impact development best management practices to reduce
stormwater runoff.
Action PS-3b: Review projects for project-related flood control and stormwater
management impacts to ensure that all proposed development comply with the City’s MS4
permit.
2. Groundwater Supplies
Threshold: Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HWQ-2, pages 5.10-20 through
5.10-23)
Explanation: The Study Area is underlain by the San Jacinto Groundwater Basin of the
San Jacinto River Watershed. Groundwater Basin resources in the San
Jacinto River Watershed have been delineated into four separate
groundwater sub-basins or groundwater management zones, of which the
Study Area is within the Hemet/San Jacinto Groundwater Management
Area. The Hemet/San Jacinto Management Area is in the western portion
of Riverside County and includes the cities of San Jacinto and Hemet, and
the unincorporated areas of Winchester, Valle Vista, and Cactus Valley.
The Study Area is served by three water service providers: the City of San
Jacinto Water Department, the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD),
and the Lake Hemet Municipal Water District (LHMWD). The vast
majority of the Study Area is located within the City’s and EMWD’s service
area, while a small portion is located within the LHMWD service area. All
three water service providers have concluded in their respective Urban
Water Management Plans (UWMPs) that they will be able to meet projected
future water demand.
Subsequent development projects under the General Plan Update, such as
residential, commercial, industrial, and roadway projects, would result in
new impervious surfaces and could reduce rainwater infiltration and
Findings
Page 86 of 266
groundwater recharge. However, the majority of development anticipated
by the General Plan Update is within areas currently developed with urban
uses. The General Plan Land Use Map proposed under the General Plan
Update redesignates a minimal amount (97 acres or less than two percent of
the Study Area) of land currently designated for open spaces uses to urban
uses. The amount of new pavement and impervious surfaces, and the extent
to which they affect infiltration, depends on the site-specific features and
soil types of a given project site. Projects located in urban areas would have
less of an impact than projects converting open lands and spaces.
Additionally, natural recharge to the San Jacinto Basin is primarily from
percolation of flow in the San Jacinto River and its tributary stream. The
proposed General Plan Land Use Map does not redesignate any land within
the San Jacinto River; therefore, implementation under the General Plan
Update would not significantly impact natural rainwater infiltration and
groundwater recharge in the San Jacinto River beyond existing conditions.
Given that implementation and future buildout under the General Plan
Update would not appreciably add to the volume of imperious surfaces in
the Study Area, when compared to the overall size of the regional
groundwater basin recharge area, and that there are adequate water supplies
(including groundwater) to serve the projected buildout demand of the
General Plan, this potential impact would be less than significant, and no
additional mitigation is required. The General Plan Update Public Safety
Element and Resource Management Element includes policies that support
water conservation, groundwater management, and coordination with local
water districts when planning for adequate capacity to accommodate future
growth. Goal RM-2 aims to protect the City’s water resources. Policy RM-
2.1 directs cooperation with regional governments and other agencies with
regard to groundwater quality and quantity. Policy RM-2.2 protects aquifers
and encourages groundwater recharge within the Basin. Policy RM-2.3
promotes water conservation. Policy RM-2.4 promotes groundwater
recharge by avoiding development that would impact watershed areas and
natural drainage channels. Policy RM-2.5 ensures cooperation with local
water agencies to manage stormwater runoff. Policy RM-2.7 promotes the
expanded use of reclaimed water, and Action RM-2c directs participation
in programs that would expand the use of reclaimed water for urban and
agricultural irrigation. Action RM-2d encourages conservation techniques,
including aquifer and groundwater recharge programs, water conservation
education, requiring drought resistant plant species in landscaping for
public and private areas, expanding the use of reclaimed water, and
requiring water conservation devises in public and private development
projects. Action RM-2f incorporates open space and preservation areas in
areas used for ground water recharge and drainage detention. Action RM-
9a directs cooperation with water districts to ensure the provision and
maintenance of adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities
through analysis of impacts during the development proposal process,
Findings
Page 87 of 266
development impact fees, and requiring water conservation devices and
water efficient landscaping. Action RM-9e ensures cooperation with the
Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage groundwater
resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable
federal, State and local regulations. Implementation of the General Plan
policies, combined with continued management of the San Jacinto
Groundwater Basin, would further ensure that future development
anticipated by the General Plan Update would not substantially decrease
groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water
resources.
Policy RM-2.1: Regional Cooperation. Cooperate with federal, State, and county
governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and
quantity of local and regional groundwater resources.
Policy RM-2.2: Groundwater Management. Protect aquifers within the Basin and
encourage groundwater recharge.
Policy RM-2.3: Conservation. Promote residential, commercial, and institutional water
conservation strategies using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best
practices.
Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to
watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining
these resources in their natural condition if feasible.
Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively
and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water
conservation strategy.
Policy RM-2.7: Reclaimed Water. Promote the expanded use of reclaimed water, where
feasible.
Action RM-2c: In cooperation with the state, regional, and local water agencies and
suppliers, participate in programs that seek to expand the availability and use of recycled
water for irrigation where feasible and legally permitted. Specifically, support the
expansion of the use of recycled water for urban and agricultural irrigation. Cooperate with
Findings
Page 88 of 266
these agencies to establish standards and regulations for the use of recycled water in
development projects.
Action RM-2d: Work with the water districts and private developers to encourage water
conservation in the following ways:
Implementing aquifer and groundwater recharge programs
Participating in water conservation programs operated by the local and regional
water districts
Establishing water conservation education programs
Requiring the use of drought resistant plant species in landscaping for public and
private areas, including parks and recreational facilities, in accordance with the
Water Efficient Landscaping requirements.
Expanding the production and use of reclaimed water
Requiring the incorporation of water conservation devices, including low flush
toilets, flow restriction devices, and water conserving appliances in both new public
and private development projects and rehabilitation projects.
Action RM-2f: Whenever feasible, incorporate improved open space and preservation
areas and quasi-active recreation facilities in areas used for ground water recharge and/or
drainage detention.
Action RM-9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water
supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.
Specifically, the City should:
During the processing of development proposals, ensure the water districts are
consulted regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and
sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, require
proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the
application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during
construction and development.
Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any
new development.
Require water conservation devices and xeriscape water efficient landscaping in
new public and private development and redevelopment projects.
Action RM-9b: Cooperate with the water districts to update population projections, water
use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water
and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years.
Findings
Page 89 of 266
Action RM-9e: Cooperate with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage
groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable
federal, State and local regulations.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Policy PS-3.7: Stormwater Runoff. Encourage new developments that add impervious
surfaces to integrate low impact development best management practices to reduce
stormwater runoff.
3. Erosion, Siltation, Flooding, and Runoff
Threshold: Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; substantially increase
the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or offsite; create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or impede or
redirect flood flows?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HWQ-3, pages 5.10-24 through
5.10-28)
Explanation: Erosion and Siltation
Implementation under the General Plan Update would result in new
development projects, such as residential, commercial, industrial, and
roadway projects, which may increase the area of impervious surfaces
and/or result in alteration of existing drainage patterns. Future development
under the General Plan Update would be subject to NPDES permit
requirements that address the control of erosion and siltation. This includes
the Construction General Permit, which requires a SWPPP and the effective
implementation of erosion control measures for projects greater than one
acre in size (or part of a larger plan of development). The Santa Ana
RWQCB conducts inspections and enforces the Construction General
Permit at construction sites. Additionally, future development on hillside
areas would be subject to Municipal Code Chapter 15.28, Hillside
Development, which requires City approval of a development plan prior to
development on hillsides in the City. Approval of a hillside development
plan may require drainage and landscaping features to reduce water erosion
and provide for groundwater recharge, in accordance with the general
grading guidelines described in Municipal Code Section 15.28.050, Soils,
Grading, and Drainage.
Findings
Page 90 of 266
Development under the General Plan Update would also be subject to the
post-construction requirements of the MS4 NPDES permit. SJDC Section
17.600.100 requires as part of the permit application process preparation of
a project-specific WQMP and drainage study for review and approval by
the City prior to issuance of a grading permit(s). The WQMP ensures that
implementing project designs have incorporated current LID methods (or
adequately demonstrated why LID will not be feasible) for the effective
treatment of pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff from a design storm
event. Project-specific drainage studies would demonstrate the pre- and
post-construction hydrology and hydraulics of implementing projects, and
how the project and any incorporated elements, such as such detention
basins, would ensure that adverse downstream impacts to receiving waters
and/or receiving drainage facilities have been mitigated. Discharges that are
not authorized by a NPDES permit must be permitted by other means by
the Santa Ana RWQCB or SWRCB (e.g., filing a Report of Waste
Discharge, Water Quality Certification).
Further, the General Plan Update Public Safety Element and Resource
Management Element includes goals, policies, and actions that address
erosion and siltation from the addition of impervious surfaces and alteration
of existing drainage patterns. Policy PS-3.7 encourages new developments
that add impervious surfaces to integrate LID BMPs to reduce stormwater
runoff. Actions PS-1G and RM-1f require surveys of soil and geologic
conditions during review of discretionary development and redevelopment
proposals, where appropriate, and requires mitigation if potential impacts
are identified. Action PS-3b requires review of projects for project-related
flood control and stormwater management impacts to ensure that all
proposed development comply with the City’s MS4 permit. Action RM-2a
reduces erosion and siltation by requiring new development and
redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff through
implementation of BMPs and requiring projects of one acre or more to
complete a SWPPP. Action RM-2b enhances water quality by cooperating
with the RWQCB to develop a plan to assist agricultural operations to
reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters. Through
implementation of the General Plan Update policies and existing
regulations, erosion/siltation impacts from changes to the existing drainage
patterns and increasing impervious surfaces would be less than significant
and no mitigation is required
Surface Runoff
Future development under the General Plan Update has the potential to
result in changes to the existing drainage patterns and could exceed the
capacity of stormwater drainage systems and/or cause flooding on- or off-
site of a project. The RCFCWCD and the City operate and maintain a
network of flood control facilities within the Study Area. As specified in
Findings
Page 91 of 266
SJDC Section 17.600.100, WQMPs would be required for qualifying
projects to incorporate LID BMPs into the drainage system, slowing on-
and off-site flow rates and decreasing flooding. WQMPs would also
evaluate methods of on-site retention of runoff, such as cisterns, rain barrels,
and basins which allow for a metered release of flows, typically after the
rain event has passed, when capacity becomes available in the downstream
pipes and channels. The General Plan Update contains goals, policies, and
actions to provide adequate stormwater infrastructure for flood control and
to reduce run-off quantity. Policy PS-3.7 encourages new developments that
add impervious surfaces to integrate LID BMPs to reduce stormwater
runoff. Policy PS-3.10 ensures coordination with the RCDCD to consider
the expansion of flood control facilities based on changing flood conditions
associated with climate change and extreme weather. Policy PS-3.12 directs
the City to regularly assess and maintain local storm drainage infrastructure
to ensure that the system is functioning property. Action PS-3f ensures the
City regularly reviews county, State, and federal flood control best practices
and incorporates appropriate standards into the Municipal Code. Policy
RM-2.5 ensures cooperation with local water agencies to manage
stormwater runoff. Action RM-2a requires new development and
redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff through
implementation of BMPs and requiring projects of one acre or more to
complete a SWPPP. Through implementation of the General Plan Update
Plan goals, policies, and actions and existing federal, State, and local
regulations discussed above, runoff would not exceed the capacity of
drainage systems, provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff,
or cause flooding impacts from changes to the existing drainage patterns
and increased impervious surfaces. Therefore, impacts would be less than
significant and no mitigation is required.
Flood Flows
Several portions of the Study Area are subject to the 100-year flood and a
small portion of the City is located within a mapped portion of the 500-year
FEMA flood zone. Based on FEMA mapping, the northern portion of the
City, generally located along the San Jacinto River and the Colorado River
Aqueduct, is within a mapped portion of the 100-year FEMA flood zone.
The General Plan Update sets policies and actions for buildout of the City,
but does not envision or authorize any specific development project. Policy
PS-3.1 directs City coordination with local, state, and federal agencies to
ensure that the City’s regulations related to flood control are in compliance
with federal, state, and local standards. Policy PS-3.6 ensures the City
adheres to the latest building, site, and design codes in the California
Building Code and FEMA flood control guidelines to avoid or minimize the
risk of flooding hazards. Policy PS-3.8 protects the community from flood
hazards by providing and maintaining flood control facilities and limiting
development within the flood plain and flood way. Policy PS-3.11 requires
Findings
Page 92 of 266
all new development and redevelopment in areas susceptible to flooding to
incorporate mitigation measures designed to reduce flood hazards. Policy
PS-3.12 directs the City to regularly assess and maintain local storm
drainage infrastructure to ensure that the system is functioning property.
Policy RM-2.4 encourages development that avoids impacts to watershed
areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks,
retaining these resources in their natural condition if feasible. Action PS-3f
ensures the City regularly reviews county, State, and federal flood control
best practices and incorporates appropriate standards into the Municipal
Code. As described above, Municipal Code Chapter 15.40, Floodplain
Management, provides land use and development regulations to all land
within flood-prone, mudslide (i.e., mudflow), or flood-related erosion areas,
including City review of development permits to ensure adherence to
federal, State, and local flood-related regulations as well as additional
standards applicable to all areas of special flood hazards in the City. Future
development projects would be reviewed by the City to determine if a
project site is located within areas of special flood hazards and thus subject
to additional provisions set forth in Chapter 15.40. Additionally,
construction of storm drainage improvements would occur as part of an
overall development or infrastructure project, and would be considered in
the environmental review associated with the specific project being
proposed. With implementation of General Plan Update goals, policies, and
implementation and compliance with existing regulations, the General Plan
Update would not impede or redirect flood flows; impacts would be less
than significant and no mitigation is required.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-1g: During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals,
require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists
and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified,
require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained
within the geologic survey.
Policy PS-3.1: Regulatory Compliance. Coordinate with local, state, and federal agencies
to ensure that the City’s regulations related to flood control are in compliance with federal,
state, and local standards.
Policy PS-3.6: Building Codes. Adhere to the latest building, site, and design codes in the
California Building Code and FEMA flood control guidelines to avoid or minimize the risk
of flooding hazards in the community.
Policy PS-3.7: Stormwater Runoff. Encourage new developments that add impervious
surfaces to integrate low impact development best management practices to reduce
stormwater runoff.
Findings
Page 93 of 266
Policy PS-3.8: Development in the Flood Plain and Flood Way. Protect the community
from flooding hazards by providing and maintaining flood control facilities and limiting
development within the flood plain and flood way as necessary to protect public health and
safety.
Policy PS-3.9: Existing Flood Zones. Maintain dialogue with the RCFCD regarding
regional flood facilities.
Policy PS-3.10: Changing Conditions. Coordinate with the RCDCD to consider the need
to expand the capacity of flood control facilities based on changing flood conditions
associated with climate change and extreme weather.
Policy PS-3.11: Mitigation. Require that all new development and redevelopment in areas
susceptible to flooding incorporate mitigation measures designed to reduce flood hazards.
Policy PS-3.12: Adequate Infrastructure. Maintain and regularly assess the status of
local storm drainage infrastructure to ensure that the system is functioning property.
Action PS-3b: Review projects for project-related flood control and stormwater
management impacts to ensure that all proposed development comply with the City’s MS4
permit.
Action PS-3f: Periodically review county, state, and federal flood control best practices
and incorporate appropriate standards into the Municipal Code.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and
soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or
Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State
licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential
geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the
recommendations contained within the survey.
Policy RM-2.1: Regional Cooperation. Cooperate with federal, State, and county
governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and
quantity of local and regional groundwater resources.
Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to
watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining
these resources in their natural condition if feasible.
Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively
and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water
conservation strategy.
Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new
development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through
Findings
Page 94 of 266
implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of
water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing
development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific
development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with
relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8-
2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).
Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a
plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.
Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the
planning area as well as downstream.
4. Flood Hazard, Tsunami, and Seiche Zones
Threshold: In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of
pollutants due to project inundation?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HWQ-4, pages 5.10-28 through
5.10-32)
Explanation: Several portions of the Study Area are subject to the 100-year flood and a
small portion of the City is located within a mapped portion of the 500-year
FEMA flood zone. Based on FEMA mapping, the northern portion of the
City, generally located along the San Jacinto River and the Colorado River
Aqueduct, is within a mapped portion of the 100-year FEMA flood zone.
pursuant to the CWA, each subsequent development project or
improvement project that disturbs more than one acre would be required to
obtain NPDES coverage under the Construction General Permit, which
would require an approved SWPPP that includes BMPs for grading and
preservation of topsoil. SWPPPs are designed to control storm water quality
degradation to the extent practicable using BMPs during and after
construction. In addition, the regulations of San Jacinto Municipal Code
Chapter 15.40 restrict land uses that are dangerous to public health, safety,
and property due to water or erosion hazards and require land uses
vulnerable to flood, mudslide, or flood-related erosion be protected against
flood damage at the time of initial construction. Further, the General Plan
Update Safet y Element includes goals, policies, and actions to reduce the
risk of flooding and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Policy
PS-3.1 directs City coordination with local, state, and federal agencies to
ensure that the City’s regulations related to flood control are in compliance
with federal, state, and local standards. Policy PS-3.4 directs coordination
with FEMA to ensure that FIRMs correctly depict flood hazards in the City.
Findings
Page 95 of 266
Policy PS-3.5 reduces flood hazards and addresses flood-prone areas within
San Jacinto through implementation of the standards and requirements
defined in the Municipal Code. Policy PS-3.6 ensures the City adheres to
the latest building, site, and design codes in the California Building Code
and FEMA flood control guidelines to avoid or minimize the risk of
flooding hazards. Policy PS-3.8 protects the community from flood hazards
by providing and maintaining flood control facilities and limiting
development within the flood plain and flood way. Policy PS-3.10 ensures
coordination with the RCDCD to consider the expansion of flood control
facilities based on changing flood conditions associated with climate
change and extreme weather. Policy PS-3.11 requires all new development
and redevelopment in areas susceptible to flooding to incorporate mitigation
measures designed to reduce flood hazards. Policy PS-3.12 directs the City
to regularly assess and maintain local storm drainage infrastructure to
ensure that the system is functioning property. Action PS-3a monitors
changes in federal and State laws and regulations related to local flood
protection, including the NFIP and incorporates necessary changes into the
Municipal Code, the City's Emergency Operations Plan, and building codes
as required and ensures that the City’s regulations require that new
development within flood hazard zones is consistent with the Public Safety
Element and meets flood protection requirements of State law. Action PS-
3c disseminates information on flooding, flood control on private property,
floodplains, and flood preparedness to the public. Action PS-3e requires all
development located within a 100-year flood plain to be consistent with the
requirements of FEMA. Action PS-3f ensures the City regularly reviews
county, State, and federal flood control best practices and incorporates
appropriate standards into the Municipal Code. Action PS-3h ensures
continued City participation in the NFIP. Action PS-3i ensures continued
implementation of the Flood Plain Management program, and ensures
continued compliance with the rules and regulations for development in
areas of special flood hazards as determined by the FEMA and as illustrated
on the most recent FIRM.
The Study Area is located approximately 41 miles from the Pacific Ocean;
therefore, the Study Area is too far away from the nearest ocean to have any
meaningful tsunami risk.
Much of the western and eastern portions of San Jacinto have the potential
to be inundated during failure of one or more dams. However, as described
above, the dams potentially affecting the Study Area do not have a history
of dam failure, and monitoring and mitigation of dam failure is constantly
occurring at both the federal and State levels. Additionally, the General Plan
Update Safety Element includes goals, policies, and actions to reduce the
risks associated with dam inundation. Policy PS -3.2 ensures coordination
with the agencies responsible for dam operation and maintenance to reduce
the risk of dam inundation from the San Jacinto Reservoir, Diamond Valley
Findings
Page 96 of 266
Lake, Little Lake, and Hemet Lake dams. Policy PS-3.3 ensures
coordination with Reflection Lake staff to manage overflow and prevent
safety hazards on Warren Road and Cottonwood Avenue.
Therefore, with implementation of General Plan Update goals, policies, and
implementation and compliance with existing regulations, impacts
associated with the risk of pollutants from seiches and flooding that may
result from adoption and implementation of the General Plan Update would
be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-1g: During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals,
require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists
and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified,
require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained
within the geologic survey.
Policy PS-3.1: Regulatory Compliance. Coordinate with local, state, and federal agencies
to ensure that the City’s regulations related to flood control are in compliance with federal,
state, and local standards.
Policy PS-3.2: Dam Operation and Maintenance. Coordinate with the agencies
responsible for dam operation and maintenance to reduce the risk of dam inundation from
the San Jacinto Reservoir, Diamond Valley Lake, Little Lake, and Hemet Lake dams.
Policy PS-3.3: Reflection Lake Overflow. Coordinate with Reflection Lake staff to
manage overflow and prevent safety hazards on Warren Road and Cottonwood Avenue.
Policy PS-3.4: FEMA Coordination. Coordinate with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) to ensure that Federal Insurance Rate Maps correctly depict
flood hazards in the City.
Policy PS-3.5: Municipal Code. Implement the standards and requirements defined in the
Municipal Code to reduce flood hazards and address flood-prone areas within San Jacinto.
Policy PS-3.6: Building Codes. Adhere to the latest building, site, and design codes in the
California Building Code and FEMA flood control guidelines to avoid or minimize the risk
of flooding hazards in the community.
Policy PS-3.7: Stormwater Runoff. Encourage new developments that add impervious
surfaces to integrate low impact development best management practices to reduce
stormwater runoff.
Policy PS-3.8: Development in the Flood Plain and Flood Way. Protect the community
from flooding hazards by providing and maintaining flood control facilities and limiting
Findings
Page 97 of 266
development within the flood plain and flood way as necessary to protect public health and
safety.
Policy PS-3.9: Existing Flood Zones. Maintain dialogue with the RCFCD regarding
regional flood facilities.
Policy PS-3.10: Changing Conditions. Coordinate with the RCDCD to consider the need
to expand the capacity of flood control facilities based on changing flood conditions
associated with climate change and extreme weather.
Policy PS-3.11: Mitigation. Require that all new development and redevelopment in areas
susceptible to flooding incorporate mitigation measures designed to reduce flood hazards.
Policy PS-3.12: Adequate Infrastructure. Maintain and regularly assess the status of
local storm drainage infrastructure to ensure that the system is functioning property.
Action PS-3a: Monitor changes in Federal and State laws and regulations related to local
flood protection, including the National Flood Insurance Program and incorporate
necessary changes into the Municipal Code, the City's Emergency Operations Plan, and
building codes as required and ensure that the City’s regulations require that new
development within flood hazard zones is consistent with this Public Safety Element and
is required to meet the flood protection requirements of State law, including but not limited
to Government Code Sections 65007, 65865.5, 65962 and 66474.5.
Action PS-3b: Review projects for project-related flood control and stormwater
management impacts to ensure that all proposed development comply with the City’s MS4
permit.
Action PS-3c: Disseminate information on flooding, flood control on private property,
floodplains, and flood preparedness to the public.
Action PS-3d: Communicate with FEMA periodically regarding updates to Flood
Insurance Rate Maps and Letter of Map Revisions.
Action PS-3e: All development located within a 100-year flood plain shall be consistent
with the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Action PS-3f: Periodically review county, state, and federal flood control best practices
and incorporate appropriate standards into the Municipal Code.
Action PS-3g: Work with the RCFCD and Regulatory Federal, State and local agencies
and department to apply for grants that provide funding for local drainage controls.
FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant, Flood Mitigation Assistance Programs, and Pre-disaster
Mitigation Program, CalEPA and the CA State Water Resources Control Board offer grants
to municipalities throughout California.
Action PS-3h: Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
Findings
Page 98 of 266
Action PS-3i: Continue to implement the Flood Plain Management program, which
establishes rules and regulations for flood plain management. Continue to apply the rules
and regulations to development in areas of special flood hazards as determined by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and as illustrated on the most recent
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and
soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or
Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State
licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential
geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the
recommendations contained within the survey.
Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new
development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through
implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of
water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing
development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific
development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with
relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8-
2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).
Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a
plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.
Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the
planning area as well as downstream.
5. Water Quality Control Plan and Groundwater Management Plan
Threshold: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact HWQ-5, pages 5.10-32 through
5.10-36)
Explanation: The local water quality control plan (Basin Plan) is maintained by the Santa
Ana RWQCB. When permittees and projects comply with the provisions of
applicable NPDES permits and water quality permitting, they are consistent
with the Basin Plan. The General Plan Update includes policies to
implement NPDES requirements and enforcement of said regulations, such
Findings
Page 99 of 266
as: Action RM-2a, which requires new development and redevelopment
projects to control stormwater runoff through implementation of BMPs and
requiring projects of one acre or more to complete a SWPPP, pursuant to
California RWQCB Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s
MS4 permit; and Action PS-3b which requires review of projects for
project-related flood control and stormwater management impacts to ensure
that all proposed development complies with the City’s MS4 permit.
Through implementation of existing regulations and the General Plan
Update policies and actions, implementation of the General Plan Update
would not conflict or obstruct a water quality control plan. Therefore,
impacts in this regard will be less than significant.
The San Jacinto Basin was designated a high-priority basin in DWR’s 2019
SGMA Basin Prioritization report. The Groundwater Sustainability Plan for
the San Jacinto Groundwater Basin applies to the entirety of the non-
adjudicated portion of the Basin. The San Jacinto Basin Judgment and
Groundwater Sustainability Plan together provide for the legal and practical
means of ensuring that the waters of the Basin are put to maximum
beneficial use. The General Plan Update does not propose site-specific
development. New development and redevelopment projects
accommodated by the General Plan Update would be subject to the
Judgment and Groundwater Sustainability Plan. Subsequent development
projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts,
consistent with the requirements of CEQA. Therefore, the General Plan
Update would not conflict with implementation of a sustainable
groundwater management plan.
The General Plan Update includes policies to support the monitoring,
protection, and development of groundwater resources which is consistent
with the tasks of the Watermaster. Policy RM-2.1 directs cooperation with
regional governments and other agencies with regard to groundwater
quality and quantity. Policy RM-2.2 protects aquifers and encourages
groundwater recharge within the Basin. Policy RM-2.3 promotes water
conservation. Policy RM-2.4 promotes groundwater recharge by avoiding
development that would impact watershed areas and natural drainage
channels. Policy RM-2.5 ensures cooperation with local water agencies to
manage stormwater runoff. Action RM-2d encourages conservation
techniques, including aquifer and groundwater recharge programs, water
conservation education, requiring drought resistant plant species in
landscaping for public and private areas, expanding the use of reclaimed
water, and requiring water conservation devises in public and private
development projects. Actions RM-2g and RM-2h reduce potential impacts
from septic systems on water sources by regulating new septic systems and
encouraging the conversion from existing septic systems to sewer. Action
RM-9a directs cooperation with water districts to ensure the provision and
maintenance of adequate water supply and sewage treatment facilities
Findings
Page 100 of 266
through analysis of impacts during the development proposal process,
development impact fees, and requiring water conservation devices and
water efficient landscaping. Action RM-9b ensures cooperation with the
water districts to update population projections, water use and sewer
generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water
and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years. Action RM-9e ensures
cooperation with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively
manage groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment
and other applicable federal, State and local regulations. Thus, adoption and
implementation of the General Plan Update will not conflict or obstruct a
sustainable groundwater management plan and impacts would be less than
significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and
soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or
Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State
licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential
geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the i mpacts per the
recommendations contained within the survey.
Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water
resources.
Policy RM-2.1: Regional Cooperation. Cooperate with federal, State, and county
governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and
quantity of local and regional groundwater resources.
Policy RM-2.2: Groundwater Management. Protect aquifers within the Basin and
encourage groundwater recharge.
Policy RM-2.3: Conservation. Promote residential, commercial, and institutional water
conservation strategies using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best
practices.
Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to
watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining
these resources in their natural condition if feasible.
Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively
and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water
conservation strategy.
Policy RM-2.6: Septic Systems. Discourage the use of septic systems to reduce potential
Findings
Page 101 of 266
negative impacts to groundwater.
Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new
development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through
implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of
water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing
development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific
development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with
relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8-
2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).
Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a
plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.
Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the
planning area as well as downstream.
Action RM-2d: Work with the water districts and private developers to encourage water
conservation in the following ways:
Implementing aquifer and groundwater recharge programs
Participating in water conservation programs operated by the local and regional
water districts
Establishing water conservation education programs
Requiring the use of drought resistant plant species in landscaping for public and
private areas, including parks and recreational facilities, in accordance with the
Water Efficient Landscaping requirements.
Expanding the production and use of reclaimed water
Requiring the incorporation of water conservation devices, including low flush
toilets, flow restriction devices, and water conserving appliances in both new public
and private development projects and rehabilitation projects.
Action RM-2e: Through the development review process, require that sufficient water
supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to
approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and Government Code
Section 66473.7.
Action RM-2f: Whenever feasible, incorporate improved open space and preservation
Findings
Page 102 of 266
areas and quasi-active recreation facilities in areas used for ground water recharge and/or
drainage detention.
Action RM-2g: During the development review process, the City shall allow new septic
systems only for low density projects if they have met the RWQCB’s minimum lot size
requirement of one-half acre per subsurface disposal system and where sewer connection
is infeasible.
Action RM-2h: Continue to encourage the conversion from existing septic systems to
sewer by limiting the replacement or expansion/repair of existing septic systems as
feasible.
Action RM-9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water
supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.
Specifically, the City should:
During the processing of development proposals, ensure the water districts are
consulted regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and
sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, require
proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the
application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during
construction and development.
Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any
new development.
Require water conservation devices and xeriscape water efficient landscaping in
new public and private development and redevelopment projects.
Action RM-9b: Cooperate with the water districts to update population projections, water
use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water
and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years.
Action RM-9e: Cooperate with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage
groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable
federal, State and local regulations.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-1g: During review of discretionary development and redevelopment proposals,
require surveys of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering Geologists
and Civil Engineers where appropriate. When potential geologic impacts are identified,
require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the recommendations contained
within the geologic survey.
Policy PS-3.7: Stormwater Runoff. Encourage new developments that add impervious
surfaces to integrate low impact development best management practices to reduce
Findings
Page 103 of 266
stormwater runoff.
Action PS-3b: Review projects for project-related flood control and stormwater
management impacts to ensure that all proposed development comply with the City’s MS4
permit.
J. LAND USE AND PLANNING
1. Established Communities
Threshold: Would the project physically divide an established community?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact LU-1, pages 5.11-1 through 5.11-
12)
Explanation: The proposed General Plan Update establishes the City’s vision for future
growth and development. Goal LU-1 of the General Plan Update aims to
achieve “A community with a land use plan that accommodates a mix of
uses to meet current and future needs.” The land uses allowed under the
proposed General Plan provide opportunities for cohesive new growth at
infill locations within existing urbanized areas of the City, as well as new
growth adjacent to existing urbanized areas, but would not create physical
division within the community. The proposed General Plan Update does not
include any new areas designated for urbanization or new roadways,
infrastructure, or other features that would divide existing communities.
The General Plan Update Land Use Element includes policies and actions
to support cohesive development that would not physically divide an
established community. Specifically, Policy LU-2.6 would continue to
annex land within the City’s SOI to promote compatibility between new and
existing uses. Policy LU-3.1 considers as part of the development review
process the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and
the ability of new development to enhance the character of the surrounding
area. Action LU-3b, through the development review process, evaluates
development proposals for land use and transportation network
compatibility with existing surrounding or abutting development or
neighborhoods. The proposed General Plan would have a less than
significant impact associated with the physical division of an established
community.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and
enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes
efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse
gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures
Findings
Page 104 of 266
compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this
Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).
Policy LU-2.6: Annexation. Continue to annex land within the City’s Sphere of Influence
to promote compatibility between new and existing uses.
Policy LU-3.1: Surrounding Uses. Consider as part of the development review process
the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new
development to enhance the character of the surrounding area.
Policy LU-3.2: Residential Uses. Require that new residential development be designed
to protect residents from potential conflicts with adjacent land uses, and other features
including rail corridors, and high-volume roadways.
Action LU-3b: Through the development review process, evaluate development proposals
for land use and transportation network compatibility with existing surrounding or abutting
development or neighborhoods.
2. Conflicts With Plans
Threshold: Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict
with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact LU-2, pages 5.11-13 through 5.11-
29)
Explanation: The proposed General Plan Update was prepared in conformance with State
laws and regulations associated with the preparation of general plans,
including requirements for environmental protection. Discussion of the
proposed General Plan’s consistency with State regulations, plans, and
policies associated with specific environmental issues (e.g., air quality,
transportation, water quality, etc.) is provided in the relevant chapters of this
Draft EIR. The State would continue to have authority over any State-
owned lands in the vicinity of the City and the proposed General Plan
Update would not conflict with continued application of State land use
plans, policies, and regulations adopted to avoid or mitigate environmental
effects. The General Plan Update would be consistent with SCAG’s
regional planning efforts and a less than significant impact would occur in
this regard. As set forth by State law, the General Plan serves as the primary
planning document for the City and subordinate documents and plans would
be updated to be consistent with the General Plan. Similar to the existing
General Plan, the proposed General Plan Update focuses on a balanced land
use pattern, creating a community where new development blends with
existing neighborhoods, and promoting the City as a desirable place to live
and work. The proposed General Plan Update carries forward and enhances
policies and measures from the City’s existing General Plan that were
Findings
Page 105 of 266
intended for environmental protection, and would not remove or conflict
with City plans, policies, or regulations adopted for environmental
protection. The proposed General Plan Update would require modifications
to the City’s Development Code to provide consistency between the
General Plan and zoning; however, these modifications will not remove or
adversely alter portions of the San Jacinto Municipal Code that were
adopted to mitigate an environmental effect. Subsequent development and
infrastructure projects would be required to be consistent with all applicable
policies, standards, and regulations, including those land use plans, policies,
and regulations adopted to mitigate environmental effects by the City as
well as those adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over components of
future development projects. Any potential environmental impact
associated with conflicts with land use requirements would be less than
significant. The policies listed below would ensure that the General Plan
Update does not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and
enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes
efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse
gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures
compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this
Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).
Policy LU-2.2: Infill Development. Encourage new development to occur in infill
locations in a balanced and efficient pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves open space, and
creates convenient connections to other land uses and activity centers.
Policy LU-2.4: Agricultural Uses. Allow and support the continuation of agricultural
operations on lands within the City limits that are designated for develo pment uses, until
such time as new development is proposed for the land.
Action LU-2e: Give priority to redevelopment and infill projects that reduce development
pressure on agricultural lands and other sensitive resources.
Action LU-2f: Work with property owners and agricultural operations interested in
retaining agricultural land to identify feasible ways to maintain the land in agricultural
production. Apply agricultural conservation easements to land desired by the City and the
property owner to remain as agricultural land.
Policy LU-4.4 Pedestrian Design. Support pedestrian-friendly and pedestrian-scaled
development that encourages more social interaction and less automobile use, especially
in the Downtown Village.
Findings
Page 106 of 266
MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.1: Balanced Circulation System. Provide for a balanced circulation system
that promotes the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City
(Figure M-1).
Policy M-1.2: Access and Mobility. Strive to maintain sufficient access and mobility for
all modes of travel and users of the roadway network.
Policy M-1.3: Maintenance and Infrastructure. Support the circulation system with
consistent maintenance and necessary infrastructure improvements, such as flood control
and bridges, as funding is available.
Policy M-1.4: Truck Routes. Maintain a truck route network that supports the efficient
movement of goods within and beyond the City, while minimizing noise and safety hazards
to the extent feasible.
Policy M-1.5: Transportation Improvements for All Users. Encourage roadway,
sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway
system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety.
Policy M-1.6: ADA Accessibility. Manage and improve the City's transportation network
to be safe, accessible, and consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to
allow mobility-impaired users to safely travel within and beyond the City.
Policy M-1.8: Traffic Calming. Encourage programming and design strategies to
maintain safe vehicular speeds on roadways, including traffic calming measures, where
applicable.
Action M-1a Periodically review and assess the vehicular operating conditions along City
facilities to determine what, if any, improvements are warranted to maintain a safe and
efficient flow of traffic in the City. Improvements may be identified and included in the
City’s Capital Improvement Plan and/or required as part of project approval through the
development review process.
Action M-1b: As part of development review and specific plans, review any existing gaps
in active transportation infrastructure, including sidewalk gaps or trails previously
identified in the Trails Master Plan, that inhibit mobility. Improvements may be
recommended or required as part of projects to meet M-1 policies.
Action M-1d: Include ADA-accessible facilities as part of roadway infrastructure projects.
Goal M-2: Regional Circulation System. A circulation system that is integrated with
the larger regional transportation system to support the economic well-being of the
community.
Policy M-2.1: Regional Agency Coordination. Coordinate with regional transportation
agencies, including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Riverside
Findings
Page 107 of 266
County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) to
implement roadway improvements that encourage the safe and efficient flow of traffic
within and beyond the City—for example, State Route 79 (SR-79) and Mid County
Parkway (Figure M-2).
Policy M-2.2: Adjacent Jurisdictions. Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions regarding
the planning and construction of local nearby circulation improvements and public transit
systems.
Policy M-2.3: Regional Development. Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions to reduce
the impacts of proposed development projects outside the City on transportation facilities
and services within the City.
Policy M-2.4: Public Transit. Promote public transportation programs that effectively
serve the City's residents and workers by connecting users to local and regional
destinations, including jobs, recreation, retail, and other activity centers.
Action M-2a: Periodically coordinate with RCTC and Caltrans to inform the City’s long-
term mobility plans and priorities through regular communication and coordination.
Action M-2b: Participate in regional planning forums to bring the City’s concerns to the
regional level.
Action M-2c: Monitor land use, circulation planning, and the development review process
of neighboring jurisdictions, so that the City has an opportunity to recommend that impacts
to the City are considered by those jurisdictions.
Action M-2d: Periodically coordinate with RTA to actively engage on transit service
planning and operational needs.
Policy M-3.1: Complete Streets. Apply context-sensitive complete streets principles to
new roadways and to transportation improvements to serve all modes of travel and users
of all ages and abilities.
Policy M-3.2: Multimodal Facilities. Incorporate facilities and design features into
transportation improvement projects that support the use of public transit and active
transportation.
Action M-3a: When planning roadway facilities, incorporate the concept of complete
streets. Consider design elements for all modes and users that use streets in a context-
sensitive manner.
Goal M-4: Active Transportation. An extensive and regionally linked network of trails,
bicycle lanes, and sidewalk paths that encourage active transportation as viable for
transportation and recreation
Policy M-4.2: Active Transportation Network. Provide and maintain an extensive active
transportation and trail network that supports bicycles, pedestrians, and equestrians and is
Findings
Page 108 of 266
linked to regional facilities and facilities of adjacent jurisdictions (Figure M-2).
Policy M-4.5: Support Facilities. Encourage new developments to provide bicycle
parking, lockers, and other support facilities for bicyclists.
Action M-4a: Review and update the City’s Municipal Code, as necessary, to consider
bicycle and pedestrian access as part of the site plan review for new development projects.
Goal M-6: Transportation Management. Transportation management strategies that
comply with the County Congestion Management Plan and regional and statewide
greenhouse gas emissions targets.
Policy M-6.1: Vehicle Miles Traveled. Maintain vehicle miles traveled (VMT) thresholds
and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) mitigation requirements for the purpose
of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Policy M-6.2: Transportation Demand Management. Create and implement TDM and
congestion management mitigation measures in areas experiencing high levels of
congestion and VMT levels.
Policy M-6.3: Regional Plans. Review development proposals for compliance with
regional plans such as the RCTC Congestion Management Plan.
Policy M-6.4: New Development. Work with developers to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and minimize congestion related to new development through improvements to
the circulation system and on-site improvements that encourage non-vehicular modes of
travel.
Action M-6a: Review and update the City’s Municipal Code and related implementation
documents, as necessary, to reflect TDM best practices.
Action M-6b: Consider allowing for a reduction in parking standards for developments if
comprehensive TDM programs and/or parking strategies are provided.
Action M-6c: Require developments that are approved based on TDM plans to incorporate
monitoring and enforcement of TDM targets as part of those plans.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Policy PS-7.1 Community Preparedness. Promote a well-prepared City that can
effectively overcome natural disasters and scarcity of resources due to climate change.
Policy PS-7.2 Collaboration. Collaborate with local, regional, state and/or federal
jurisdictions and agencies on climate resiliency and adaptation strategies.
Policy PS-7.3 Ecological Recovery. Coordinate with federal, state, and local agencies to
establish ecological recovery programs.
Findings
Page 109 of 266
Policy PS-7.4: Air Pollution. Work with responsible federal, state, and county agencies to
decrease air pollution emissions occurring within the air basin to reduce the risk posed by
air pollution.
Policy PS-7.5: Energy Supply. Promote plans and programs that increase sustainable
energy sources.
Policy PS-7.6: Programs. Implement necessary actions and programs to improve drought
preparation and response for the most vulnerable community members.
Policy PS-7.7: Cooling Centers. Designate public buildings, specific private buildings, or
institutions with air conditioning as public cooling shelters; extend hours at air-conditioned
sites during periods of extreme heat or power outage (if the site is supported by a backup
generator).
Policy PS-7.8: Storms. Provide access to flood protection resources and services (signage,
sandbags, etc.) as feasible at designated public facilities during and after extreme weather
events.
Policy PS-7.9: Special Assistance. Address the needs of individuals with limited mobility
or limited access to transportation for access to safe and comfortable shelter during extreme
heat events or other severe weather events.
Policy PS-7.10: Leadership. Demonstrate leadership in local climate planning efforts
through a range of tangible actions and policies at the municipal operations level.
Policy PS-7.11: Greenhouse Gas Reductions. Reduce communitywide greenhouse gas
emissions locally by actively supporting regional efforts to reduce greenhouse gases
throughout the county.
Policy PS-7.12: Extreme Heat Vulnerabilities. Require that new developments, major
remodels, and redevelopments address urban heat island issues and reduce urban heat
island effects for the proposed project site and adjacent properties.
Policy PS-7.13: Urban Forestry Plan. Minimize damage associated with wind-related
hazards and address climate change and urban heat island effects through the development
of an urban forestry plan and proper landscaping planting and management techniques.
Policy PS-7.14: Ongoing Monitoring. Monitor climate change-related effects with local,
regional, state, and/or federal partners to provide information of effectiveness of existing
infrastructure and programs.
Action PS-7a: Provide information and resources to the public and businesses regarding
steps the City is taking to address the issue of climate change.
Action PS-7d: Evaluate the feasibility for government-constructed and/or -operated new
development to exceed the CalGreen Tier 1, or successor program, standards.
Findings
Page 110 of 266
Action PS-7e: Promote the use of sustainable and carbon-neutral energy sources in new
development.
Action PS-7f: Explore using renewable energy and clean generation technologies such as
solar, wind, biogas, or fuel cells to power City facilities where appropriate.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural
resources.
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.3: Biological Resource Protection. Preserve and enhance biological
communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive,
rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with state and federal resource
agency requirements.
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Goal RM-4: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Improved air quality in San
Jacinto and the region through reductions in air pollutants and greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions.
Policy RM-4.1: Regional Cooperation. Support regional efforts, including those
organized through the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), the
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the Western Riverside Council
of Governments (WRCOG), and the California Air Resource Board (CARB) to implement
the regional Air Quality Management Plan.
Policy RM-4.2: Measurement and Enforcement. Coordinate with the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) and South Coast Air Quality Management District to support
their ability to properly measure air quality at emission sources and enforce the standards
of the Clean Air Act.
Policy RM-4.4: Transportation Options. Promote alternative modes of transportation to
reduce vehicular emissions and improve air quality. (See Mobility Element)
Policy RM-4.5: Walkability. Encourage pedestrian-scale development and pedestrian-
friendly design features to reduce vehicle emissions. (See Mobility Element)
Policy RM-4.6: Sustainable Development. Encourage and incentivize higher density and
Findings
Page 111 of 266
mixed-use development opportunities within designated areas of the City to lessen the
impacts of traffic congestion on local air quality. (See Land Use Element)
Policy RM-4.7: Sensitive Receptors. Insulate sensitive receptors from areas of heightened
air quality pollution, by utilizing land use planning to buffer and protect residential areas.
Policy RM-4.8: Mitigation. Require the implementation of relevant mitigation measures
for all future development upon identification of potential air quality impacts.
Policy RM-4.9: Local Reduction Targets. The City of San Jacinto establishes the
following per capita GHG reduction targets, in order to meet the requirements established
by the state under AB 32 and SB 32, consistent with the CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan:
1.83 MTCO2e per service population (SP) by 2030; and
0.62 MTCO2e per service population (SP) by 2050
Policy RM-4.10: GHG Reduction. Consider and adopt new local policies and programs
that will help to provide energy efficient alternatives to fossil fuel use and reduce
consumption in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the local
measures identified in the Western Riverside County Subregional Climate Action Plan for
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-4.11: Carbon Reduction. Expand the number of parks and trees in San Jacinto
to provide a larger carbon sink or area containing natural sources that retain more carbon
than what those sources emit.
Action RM-4a: Implement the local GHG reduction measures identified in the Western
Riverside Council of Government’s Subregional Climate Action Plan (CAP) for San
Jacinto, participate in future updates of the CAP, and on an annual basis record the status
of each local measure and submit the results to WRCOG using the WRCOG Climate
Action Plan Tracking Tool.
Action RM-4b: As applicable, review new industrial and commercial development
projects during the CEQA process for potential air quality impacts to residences and other
sensitive receptors. Ensure that mitigation measures and best management practices are
implemented to reduce significant emissions of criteria pollutants.
Action RM-4c: Review development, infrastructure, and planning projects for consistency
with SCAQMD requirements during the CEQA review process. Require project applicants
to prepare air quality analyses to address SCAQMD and General Plan requirements, as
appropriate, which include analysis and identification of:
1. Air pollutant emissions associated with the project during construction, project
operation, and cumulative conditions.
2. Potential exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants.
Findings
Page 112 of 266
3. Significant air quality impacts associated with the project for construction, project
operation, and cumulative conditions.
4. Mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts to less than significant or the
maximum extent feasible where impacts cannot be mitigated to less than
significant.
Action RM-4d: Work with the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern
California Association of Governments, the Western Riverside Council of Governments,
and the California Air Resource Board to implement programs aimed at improving regional
air quality.
Action RM-4e: Continue to review development projects to ensure that all new public and
private development complies with the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24
standards as well as the energy efficiency standards established by the San Jacinto
Municipal Code.
Action RM-4f: Monitor GHG emissions generated by the community over time for
consistency with the established GHG reduction targets, and strive to update the City’s
community GHG Inventory every five years. In the event that the City determines that
ongoing efforts to reduce GHG emissions are not on track to meet the City’s adopted GHG
reduction targets, the City shall establish and adopt new and/or revised GHG reductions
measures that will effectively meet the established GHG reduction targets.
Action RM-4g: Provide the necessary facilities and infrastructure to facilitate the use of
City-owned low or zero-emission vehicles such as electric vehicle charging facilities at key
City facilities as operations necessitate and/or as funding becomes available.
Action RM-4h: Evaluate and consider multi-modal transportation benefits to all City
employees, such as free or low-cost monthly public transportation (bus) passes. Encourage
employer participation in similar programs. Encourage new transit/shuttle services and use.
Action RM-4i: Evaluate and consider the feasibility of allowing private bicycle rental
companies to operate in San Jacinto.
Action RM-4j: Encourage community car-sharing and carpooling.
Action RM-4k: Support the establishment and expansion of a regional network of electric
vehicle charging stations and encourage the expanded use of electric vehicles.
Action RM-4l: Establish and adopt standards and requirements for electric vehicle
parking, including minimum requirements for the installation of electric vehicle charging
stations in new multi-family residential and commercial, office, and light industrial
development.
Action RM-4m: Adopt a Green Building Program to promote the reduction of urban heat
islands through vegetation management and cool surfaces. Encourage multi -family
residential and non-residential development to increase the use of higher-albedo materials
Findings
Page 113 of 266
for surfaces including roofs, parking areas, driveways, roads, and sidewalks. Encourage
developments with parking lot areas to shade these areas with vegetation or solar panels
when appropriate. Support various programs to plant and maintain trees, which can also
contribute to a reduction of urban heat islands.
Action RM-4n: Future development projects will be required to demonstrate consistency
with SCAQMD construction emission thresholds. Where emissions from individual
projects exceed SCAQMD thresholds, the following actions should be incorporated as
necessary to minimize impacts. These measures do not exclude the use of other, equally
effective mitigation measures as determined by a project specific Air Quality Assessment.
Require all off-road diesel equipment greater than 50 horsepower (hp) used for this
Project to meet USEPA Tier 4 final off-road emission standards or equivalent. Such
equipment shall be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT)
devices including a California Air Resources Board Certified Level 3 Diesel
Particulate Filter (DPF) or equivalent. The DPF reduces diesel particulate matter
and NOx emissions during construction activities.
Require a minimum of 50 percent of construction debris be diverted for recycling.
Require building materials to contain a minimum 10 percent recycled content.
Require materials such as paints, primers, sealants, coatings, and glues to have a
low volatile organic compound concentration compared to conventional products.
If low VOC materials are not available, architectural coating phasing should be
extended sufficiently to reduce the daily emissions of VOCs.
Action RM-4o: Future development projects will be required to demonstrate consistency
with SCAQMD’s operational emission thresholds. For projects where operational
emissions exceed regulatory thresholds, the following measures may be used to reduce
impacts. Note the following measures are not all inclusive and developers have the option
to add or substitute measures that are equally or more appropriate for the scope of the
project.
Develop a project specific TDM program for residents and/or employees that
provides opportunities for carpool/vanpools.
Provide onsite solar/renewable energy in excess of regulatory requirements.
Require that owners/tenants of non-residential or multi-family residential
developments use architectural coatings that are 10 grams per liter or less when
repainting/repairing properties.
Require dripless irrigation and irrigation sensor units that prevent watering during
rain storms.
Ensure all parking areas are wired for capability of future EV charging and include
Findings
Page 114 of 266
EV charging stations that exceed regulatory requirements.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ELEMENT
Policy EJ-1.1: Emission Sources. Encourage existing sources of emissions to use feasible
measures to minimize air quality impacts in Environmental Justice Communities and avoid
new sources of significant emissions in these communities as feasible.
Policy EJ-1.2: Green Industry. Attract non-polluting industry and green technology
companies to the City.
Policy EJ-2.1: Convenient Access. Consider the ease of accessibility of public facilities in
relation to Environmental Justice Communities during the review and evaluation of public
facility expansion, replacement, and construction.
Policy EJ-2.2: Prioritize Resources. Apply resources to meet parks, recreation, and open
space needs in underserved areas of the City that have a demonstrably greater need for
these amenities.
Policy EJ-3.2: Access to Healthy Food. Strive to locate healthy food establishments so
that all residences are within walking distance (quarter to a half-mile) of a healthy food
store or a store with healthy options, where feasible and appropriate.
Policy EJ-3:4: Farmers Markets. Support existing farmers markets and support the
location of new farmers markets near Environmental Justice Communities wherever
feasible.
Policy EJ-5.1: Eliminate Barriers. Update the Development Code to eliminate any
barriers to facilitating the development of complete neighborhoods with access to retail
and recreation resources within walking distance of homes.
Policy EJ-5.2: Accessibility. Endeavour to provide parks that are easily accessible to the
surrounding neighborhood and beyond, and are as barrier-free as possible, particularly for
those with limited mobility.
K. MINERAL RESOURCES
1. Regional and Statewide Mineral Resources
Threshold: Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact MR-1, page 5.12-3)
Explanation: The City has no known or identified mineral resources of regional or
Statewide importance. The entire City of San Jacinto and a majority of the
Sphere of Influence are classified as MRZ-3, indicating that the significance
of the mineral deposits is undetermined. The eastern portion of the Sphere
Findings
Page 115 of 266
of Influence is classified as an MRZ-4, indicating unstudied areas or areas
with inadequate information. The General Plan Update Resource
Management Element includes policies and actions to protect mineral
resources associated with mining activities. Policy RM-5.10 ensures that
any future mining activities be in compliance with the State Mining
Reclamation Act, federal and State environmental regulations, and local
ordinances. There are no known mineral deposits or resources in the Study
Area that are of significant value to the region or the State. As such,
implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would have a less than
significant impact on this environmental topic, and no mitigation is
required.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-5: Energy and Mineral Resources. A community that safely manages its
energy and mineral resources.
Policy RM-5.10: Mineral Resources. Ensure that any future mining activities be in
compliance with the State Mining Reclamation Act, federal and state environmental
regulations, and local ordinances.
2. Locally-Important Mineral Resource
Threshold: Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact MR-2, page 5.12-3 through 5.12-
4)
Explanation: The Study Area does not contain any “locally important mineral resource
recovery sites.” The Study Area does not contain a locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan. The General Plan Update Resource
Management Element includes policies and actions to protect mineral
resources associated with mining activities. Policy RM-5.10 ensures that
any future mining activities be in compliance with the State Mining
Reclamation Act, federal and State environmental regulations, and local
ordinances. Implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in
the loss of a designated mineral recovery site and as such, no impact would
occur.
Findings
Page 116 of 266
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-5: Energy and Mineral Resources. A community that safely manages its
energy and mineral resources.
Policy RM-5.10 Mineral Resources. Ensure that any future mining activities be in
compliance with the State Mining Reclamation Act, federal and state environmental
regulations, and local ordinances.
L. NOISE
1. Groundborne Vibration and Groundborne Noise Levels
Threshold: Would the project result in the generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact NOI-2, pages 5.13-45 through
5.13-47)
Explanation: The main sources of vibration in the Study Area are related to vehicles and
construction. Typical roadway traffic, including heavy trucks, rarely
generates vibration amplitudes high enough to cause structural or cosmetic
damage. However, there have been cases in which heavy trucks traveling
over potholes or other discontinuities in the pavement have caused vibration
high enough to result in complaints from nearby residents. These types of
issues typically can be resolved by smoothing the roadway surface.
Construction activities that produce vibration that can be felt by adjacent
land uses include the use of vibratory equipment, large bulldozers, and pile
drivers. The primary sources of vibration during construction are usually
vibratory rollers and large bulldozers. Construction activities in the Study
Area have the potential to result in significant impacts related to
groundborne vibration associated with construction activities. This impact
would be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of the
General Plan Update Public Safety Element Action PS-6h, which limits
vibration levels to 0.08 in/sec PPV for historical buildings and 0.3 in/sec
PPV for contemporary buildings and requires vibration studies for new
development projects that have the potential to generate vibration impacts
which exceed the vibration limits. This would be less than the maximum
PPV levels that would potentially damage structure.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Policy PS-6.7: Construction Noise. Require construction activities to reduce noise
impacts on adjacent uses to the criteria identified in Tables PS-3 and PS-4, or, if the criteria
Findings
Page 117 of 266
cannot be met, to the maximum extent feasible complying with Chapter 8.40 of the San
Jacinto Municipal Code (Noise Control) and use best practices. Construction activities
outside of the permitted construction hours identified in the San Jacinto Municipal Code
may be approved on a case-by-case basis by the Community Development Director.
Action PS-6g: Require new residential projects located adjacent to railroad lines to follow
the FTA vibration screening distance criteria to ensure that residential uses are not exposed
to vibrations exceeding 72 VdB for frequent events (more than 70 events per day), 75 VdB
for occasional events (30-70 events per day), or 80 VdB for infrequent events (less than 30
events per day).
Action PS-6h: Require new development to minimize vibration impacts to adjacent uses
during demolition and construction. Require vibration studies for all new discretionary
projects, including those related to development and transportation, which have the
potential to generate vibration impacts which exceeds the vibration limits. This includes
projects requiring pile driving and/or construction on properties adjacent to historic
structures. For sensitive historic structures, a vibration limit of 0.08 in/sec PPV (peak
particle velocity) will be used to minimize the potential for cosmetic damage to the
building. A vibration limit of 0.30 in/sec PPV will be used to minimize the potential for
cosmetic damage at buildings of normal conventional construction.
2. Airport Noise
Threshold: For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise?
Finding: No Impact. (Draft EIR, Impact NOI-3, page 5.13-47)
Explanation: The City of San Jacinto is not located within any adopted airport land use
plan, there are no private airstrips in the vicinity of the City, and there are
no public airports located within two miles of the City. As such, there are
no impacts related to private airports, public airports, airstrips, or adopted
airport land use plans.
M. POPULATION AND HOUSING
1. Population Growth
Threshold: Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an
area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses)
or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact POP-1, pages 5.14-7 through 5.14-
10)
Findings
Page 118 of 266
Explanation: The proposed General Plan Update accommodates future growth in San
Jacinto, including new businesses, expansion of existing businesses, and
new residential uses. Infrastructure and services would need to be extended
to accommodate future growth. At 2040 buildout, the proposed General
Plan Update could accommodate approximately 16,252 new housing units
and 21,839,634 square feet of new non-residential building square footage
within the Study Area compared to existing conditions. This new growth
may increase the City’s population by approximately 54,280 residents and
19,674 jobs compared to the existing condition. Given the historical and
current population, housing, and employment trends, growth in the City, as
well as the entire state, is inevitable. The primary factors that account for
population growth are natural increase and net migration. Other factors that
affect growth include the cost of housing, the location of jobs, the economy,
the climate, and transportation. While these factors would likely result in
growth in San Jacinto during the planning period of the proposed General
Plan Update, growth would continue to occur based primarily on the
demand of the housing market and demand for new commercial, industrial,
and other non-residential uses.
Potential growth inducing impacts are also assessed based on a project’s
consistency with adopted plans that have addressed growth management
from a local and regional standpoint. SCAG is the responsible agency for
developing and adopted regional housing, population, and employment
growth forecasts for local Riverside County governments, among other
counties. SCAG provides household, population, and employment
projection estimates in five-year increments through 2045. SCAG projects
that the City’s population will reach 69,900 persons by 2045. The General
Plan Update is projected to result in a population of approximately 107,152
persons (2040). The City’s projected population would be approximately
53.3 percent greater than SCAG’s forecast. Similarly, the City’s projected
housing stock and employment would be approximately 16.6 percent and
106 percent greater than SCAG forecasts, respectively. The General Plan
Update growth projections would exceed SCAG’s 2045 population,
housing stock, and employment projections for the City of San Jacinto.
General Plan Update growth projections form the basis of SCAG’s planning
and policy documents, including regional growth forecasts. Thus, the
growth anticipated with the General Plan Update would be considered in
SCAG’s updated growth forecasts for the City.
The proposed General Plan Update is intended to accommodate the City’s
fair share of statewide housing needs, which are allocated by the SCAG,
based on regional numbers provided by the California Department of
Housing and Community Development on a regular basis (every five to
eight years). The City of San Jacinto 2021-2029 Housing Element was
adopted February 1, 2022 and accommodates San Jacinto’s share of the
regional housing need for the 2021-2029 RHNA period of 3,392 units.
Findings
Page 119 of 266
SCAG’s growth forecasts through 2045 do not take into account the
regional housing need for the 2021-2029 period.
The proposed General Plan Update includes policies and actions that
mitigate environmental impacts associated with growth, such as air quality,
noise, traffic, water supply, and water quality effects. Further, the General
Plan Update accounts for the proposed Project’s anticipated population
growth and establishes goals, policies, and actions to accommodate such
growth. The proposed Land Use Element Goal LU-2 seeks to manage and
direct growth so that the community and its neighborhoods are protected
and enhanced. Policy LU-2.1 ensures that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities
and that new development funds and constructs its fair share of
improvements. With implementation of General Plan Update policies and
actions intended to guide growth to appropriate areas and provide services
necessary to accommodate growth, the land uses allowed under the
proposed General Plan Update, the infrastructure anticipated to
accommodate proposed land uses, and the goal and policy framework
would not induce growth that would exceed adopted thresholds, beyond
those disclosed and analyzed throughout this EIR. Therefore, population
and housing growth associated with the proposed General Plan Update
would result a less than significant impact, as there are no additional
potential environmental impacts, beyond those analyzed and disclosed in
this EIR, that would result from growth accommodated by the proposed
project. No additional mitigation is required.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and
enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes
efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse
gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures
compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this
Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).
Policy LU-1.3: Balancing Jobs and Housing. Balance levels of employment and housing
within the community to provide more opportunities for San Jacinto Valley residents to
work locally, cut commute times, and improve air quality.
Goal LU-2: Managed Growth. A City that manages and directs growth so that the
community and its neighborhoods are protected and enhanced.
Policy LU-2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City
Findings
Page 120 of 266
requirements.
Policy LU-2.6: Annexation. Continue to annex land within the City’s Sphere of Influence
to promote compatibility between new and existing uses.
Policy LU-3.1: Surrounding Uses. Consider as part of the development review process
the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new
development to enhance the character of the surrounding area.
Action LU-3c: Analyze land use compatibility through the development review process to
require adequate buffers and/or architectural enhancements that protect sensitive receptors
from intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances and health
risks.
2. Displacement of Housing
Threshold: Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact POP-2, pages 5.14-10 through
5.14-11)
Explanation: The proposed General Plan Update would accommodate a mix of new
residential and non-residential development in more dense and sustainable
patterns. The General Plan Land Use Map was developed to support new
higher-density residential and mixed-use development in key areas of the
City. Due to the amount of vacant land in the City, it is anticipated that
future develop would occur on vacant land and would not displace
substantial number of existing housing units. Throughout the Study Area,
the General Plan Update is projected to increase the overall number of
dwelling units and provide housing to serve the diverse needs of the
community at various socioeconomic levels.
The General Plan Update establishes goals, policies, and actions to ensure
the compatibility of new and existing development, including housing. The
proposed Land Use Element Goal LU-2 seeks to manage and direct growth
so that the community and its neighborhoods are protected and enhanced.
Goal LU-3 promotes high-quality development and compatibility with
surrounding land uses. Policy LU-3.1 ensures the City considers the
compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of
new development to enhance the character of the surrounding area.
Therefore, impacts of the proposed General Plan Update on the
displacement of people or housing are considered less than significant and
no mitigation is required. The policies listed below would further ensure
that a range of housing types are provided in the City, and that housing
conditions are evaluated as the housing supply ages.
Findings
Page 121 of 266
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and
enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes
efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse
gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures
compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this
Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).
Goal LU-2: Managed Growth. A City that manages and directs growth so that the
community and its neighborhoods are protected and enhanced.
Policy LU-2.2: Infill Development. Encourage new development to occur in infill
locations in a balanced and efficient pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves open space, and
creates convenient connections to other land uses and activity centers.
Goal LU-3: Land Use Compatibility. A community that promotes high-quality
development and compatibility with surrounding land uses and major transportation
corridors.
Policy LU-3.1: Surrounding Uses. Consider as part of the development review process
the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new
development to enhance the character of the surrounding area.
Policy LU-3.2: Residential Uses. Require that new residential development be designed
to protect residents from potential conflicts with adjacent land uses, and other features
including rail corridors, and high-volume roadways.
Action LU-3b: Through the development review process, evaluate development proposals
for land use and transportation network compatibility with existing surrounding or abutting
development or neighborhoods.
Action LU-3c: Analyze land use compatibility through the development review process to
require adequate buffers and/or architectural enhancements that protect sensitive receptors
from intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances and health
risks.
N. PUBLIC SERVICES
1. Fire Protection
Threshold: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain
Findings
Page 122 of 266
acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives
for any of the public services: Fire Protection and Emergency Services?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact PS-1, pages 5.15-15 through 5.15-
20)
Explanation: Development accommodated under the General Plan Update would result
in additional residents and businesses in the City. 2040 buildout under the
General Plan Update could yield a net change over existing conditions of
an additional 16,252 housing units, an additional population of 54,280
people, an additional 21,839,634 square feet of non-residential building
square footage, and an additional 19,674 jobs within the Study Area. Future
development projected in the General Plan Update may result in the need
for additional Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) resources (i.e.,
additional staffing, equipment, expanded/new facilities). At this time, it is
unknown whether RCFD would need to expand or construct new facilities
to meet the demand of future development in the Study Area. Future
development is assumed to occur over time through 2040; thus, any increase
in demand for fire protection services would occur gradually as additional
development and associated population growth is added to the City. The
General Plan Update includes a range of policies and actions to ensure that
fire protection and emergency services are provided in a timely fashion, are
adequately funded, are coordinated between the City and the RCFD, and
that new development funds its fair share of services. Policy LU-1.5 ensures
the City maintains appropriate sites for institutional and public facility uses
that can accommodate the infrastructure and facilities needed to serve the
community. Policy LU-2.1 ensures that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities
and that new development funds and constructs its fair share of
improvements. Policy PS-2.1 requires that all buildings and facilities within
San Jacinto comply with local, State, and federal regulatory standards such
as the California Building and Fire Codes as well as other applicable fire
safety standards. Policy PS-2.2 reduces the risk of fire to the community by
coordinating emergency preparedness with the RCFD. Policy PS -2.4
ensures cooperation with RCFD to maintain an ongoing fire inspection
program to reduce fire hazards associated with multifamily development,
critical facilities, public assembly facilities, industrial buildings, and
nonresidential buildings. Policy PS-2.10 protects communities from
unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones by
requiring adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and
emergency vehicle access for new development in very high fire hazard
severity zones, and coordinating with RCFD to define minimum standards
for evacuation of residential areas in very high fire hazard severity zones.
Policy PS-5.1 ensures the provision of sufficient levels of all emergency
response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons
and to protect property in the City. Policy RM 6.1 encourages the RCFD to
Findings
Page 123 of 266
maintain adequate staff and equipment to provide efficient, high quality,
and responsive public safety services to the San Jacinto community. Policy
RM-9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in
collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to
ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to
identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement
improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Policy RM-
9.2 maintains and finances the capital improvement program to ensure the
timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the timely
provision of public facility and municipal improvements. Policy RM-9.3
ensures that all new development provides for and funds its fair share of the
costs for the expansion of public infrastructure, services, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.5 ensures collaboration with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan
for new development. Action RM-6c ensures cooperation with fire
departments, and local, State, and federal emergency management agencies,
to implement an Emergency Operation Center to respond to and manage
disasters. Action RM-6f directs the City, in cooperation with the RCFD, to
adopt and maintain level of service (e.g., response times, call handling) and
staffing standards, as well as a developer fee program for fire services.
Action RM-6f also ensures future developers will contribute funds for fire
services through the adopted developer fees. RCFD would continue to
regularly monitor fire department resources to ensure that adequate
facilities, staffing, and equipment are available to serve existing and future
development and population increases. Further, as development occurs, a
proportional increase in property tax, charges for RCFD services, and other
funding sources would increase and offset impacts of new development on
RCFD’s existing resources in the City. San Jacinto Municipal Code Chapter
15.08, Building Permits, requires any construction or alteration requiring a
building permit and meeting specific conditions to pay certain fees prior to
issuance of the building permit. For any new residential or non-residential
project meeting certain conditions, the owner would be required to annex
the property into the city’s Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 or into
a separate new CFD, which would provide financing for fire protection
services.
Additionally, new development projected in the General Plan Update would
be required to comply with all applicable California Fire Code requirements
for construction, access, water mains, fire flows, and hydrants. Individual
project development plans would be reviewed by RCFD to determine
specific fire requirements (e.g., fire flow capacities, emergency access, fuel
modification plans) applicable to the specific development and to ensure
compliance with these requirements.
The environmental effect of providing the fire protection and emergency
services is associated with the physical impacts of providing new and
Findings
Page 124 of 266
expanded facilities. The specific impacts of providing new and expanded
facilities cannot be determined at this time, as the General Plan Update does
not propose or authorize development nor does it designate specific sites for
new or expanded public facilities. However, the facilities would be
primarily provided on sites with land use designations that allow such uses
and the environmental impacts of constructing and operating the facilities
would likely be similar to those associated with new development,
redevelopment, and infrastructure projects under the General Plan Update.
Any future development under the General Plan Update would be required
to comply with regulations, policies, and standards included in the General
Plan Update, and would be subject to CEQA review as appropriate.
Therefore, impacts related to the provision of fire protection and emergency
services are less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.5: Public Services for Quality of Life. Maintain appropriate sites for
institutional and public facility uses that can accommodate the infrastructure and facilities
needed to serve the community.
Policy LU-2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-2: Fire Safety. A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire
emergencies.
Policy PS-2.1: Building Fire Codes. Require that all buildings and facilities within San
Jacinto comply with local, state, and federal regulatory standards such as the California
Building and Fire Codes as well as other applicable fire safety standards.
Policy PS-2.2: Fire Protection Services. Reduce the risk of fire to the community by
coordinating emergency preparedness with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD).
Policy PS-2.4: Urban Fire Risks. Work with RCFD to maintain an ongoing fire inspection
program to reduce fire hazards associated with multifamily development, critical facilities,
public assembly facilities, industrial buildings, and nonresidential buildings.
Policy PS-2.5 Grant Funding. Seek grant funding, independently and in collaboration
with regional partners, to mitigate potential wildfire threats to the community and to
implement training workshops and projects related to defensible space and fuel reduction
practices.
Policy PS-2.10: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Protect communities from
Findings
Page 125 of 266
unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones through the
following actions:
a. Minimize new residential development in very high fire hazard severity zones when
possible.
b. Require adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and emergency
vehicle access for new development in very high fire hazard severity zones.
c. Assess site constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to
avoid or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment.
d. Coordinate with RCFD to identify building and site design methods or other
methods to minimize damage if new structures are proposed to be in very high fire
hazard severity zones on undeveloped land and when rebuilding after a fire.
e. As part of the RCFD review process, require ongoing brush management, fuel
management/modification, defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other
project design features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high
wildfire risk.
f. Coordinate with the applicable water district to ensure necessary water supply
systems and flow for structural fire suppression are provided and maintained.
g. Work with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction projects, including
community fire breaks and private road and public road clearance.
h. Coordinate with RCFD to define minimum standards for evacuation of residential
areas in very high fire hazard severity zones. If areas with inadequate
access/evacuation routes are identified, develop appropriate mitigation measures,
improvement plans, or education programs to ensure safe evacuation.
Policy PS-2.11: Fire Safe Design. Consider fire safe design (i.e., fire-resistant building
and site design, materials, and landscaping) for development within very high fire hazard
severity zones as part of the development review process.
a. Locate, design and construct development to provide adequate defensibility and
minimize the risk of structural loss from wildland fires.
b. Design development on hillsides and canyons to reduce the increased risk of fires
from topography features (i.e., steep slopes, ridge saddles).
c. Minimize flammable vegetation and implement brush management best practices
in accordance with the Development Code.
d. Install visible home and street addressing and signage.
Policy PS-5.1: Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency
Findings
Page 126 of 266
response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect
property in the City.
Action PS-2c: Require that all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the
most recent California Building and Fire Code with local amendments adopted by the City,
including the use of fire sprinklers in residential structures.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-6: Public Safety Resources. A community that safeguards persons and property
through the provision of high-quality public safety services and crime prevention measures.
Goal RM-9: Infrastructure Planning. A community that provides adequate, reliable
infrastructure and facilities to support existing and future development.
Policy RM-6.1: Provision of Police and Fire Services. Encourage the Riverside County
Sheriff’s Department and the Riverside County Fire Department to maintain adequate staff
and equipment to provide efficient, high quality, and responsive public safety services to
the San Jacinto community.
Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the
timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.
Policy RM-9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its
fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational
amenities, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas
targeted for near-term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities
through the orderly extension of infrastructure.
Policy RM-9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new
development.
Action RM-6c: In cooperation with the school districts, police and fire departments, and
local, state, and federal emergency management agencies, implement an Emergency
Operation Center (EOC) to respond to and manage disasters. Provide annual training for
City staff in emergency management so that when they are called into action, they will be
able to distribute information and resources to the public effectively.
Findings
Page 127 of 266
Action RM-6f: In cooperation with the Riverside County Fire Department, adopt and
maintain level of service (e.g., response times, call handling) and staffing standards, as well
as a developer fee program for fire services. Review the level of services and funding levels
at budget time, adjusting when necessary to ensure that adequate levels of service and
facilities are provided and maintained. Future developers will contribute funds for fire
services through the adopted developer fees. During the budget and CIP process, reserve
future sites through purchase, eminent domain, dedication, donation, or a combination of
these procedures.
2. Police Protection
Threshold: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives
for any of the public services: Law Enforcement Services?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact PS-2, pages 5.15-20 through 5.15-
23)
Explanation: Development accommodated under the General Plan Update would result
in additional residents and businesses in the City, which would increase
demand for police protection services provided by RCSD. Additional
facilities, personnel, and equipment may be required to maintain adequate
levels of police protection within the City. Development assumed by the
General Plan Update is expected to occur gradually over time through 2040;
thus, any increase in demand for police protection services would similarly
occur gradually as additional development and associated population
growth is added to the City, which also depends on the economic market
demands. As individual projects are proposed within the City, Riverside
County Sheriff Department service levels and staffing requirements would
be evaluated on an annual basis to determine if additional staffing and/or
facilities would be required. If the General Plan Update is adopted, the
Riverside County Sheriff Department would be able to utilize the projected
growth in population, dwelling units, and nonresidential development to
effectively plan for increases in population and police protection service
demand. The General Plan Update includes a range of policies and actions,
to ensure that adequate police protection services are provided to serve
growth associated with implementation of the General Plan Update. Policy
LU-1.5 ensures the City maintains appropriate sites for institutional and
public facility uses that can accommodate the infrastructure and facilities
needed to serve the community. Policy LU-2.1 ensures that new
development corresponds to the provision of infrastructure, public services,
and community facilities and that new development funds and constructs its
fair share of improvements. Policy RM 6.1 encourages the Riverside
County Sheriff’s Department to maintain adequate staff and equipment to
Findings
Page 128 of 266
provide efficient, high quality, and responsive public safety services to the
San Jacinto community. Policy RM-9.1 maintains and implements public
facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service
providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional,
State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources,
and implement improvements for public facilities and services in San
Jacinto. Policy RM-9.2 maintains and finances the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the
adequate and the timely provision of public facility and municipal
improvements. Policy RM-9.3 ensures that all new development provides
for and funds its fair share of the costs for the expansion of public
infrastructure, services, and facilities. Policy RM-9.5 ensures collaboration
with the various regional facility and service providers to deliver high levels
of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new development. Actions PS-5d
and Action RM-6a adopt a level of service standard (e.g., response times,
call handling) and staffing standards as well as a developer fee program for
the Police Department, and directs the City to review the level of service
standard during the annual budget and CIP process and revise as
appropriate. Action RM-6a also ensures future developers will contribute
funds for police services through the adopted developer fees. Action RM-
6e directs the City to work with the RCSD to promote the establishment and
operation of Neighborhood Watch programs throughout the City. San
Jacinto Municipal Code Chapter 15.08, Building Permits, requires any
construction or alteration requiring a building permit and meeting specific
conditions to pay certain fees prior to issuance of the building permit. For
any new residential or non-residential project meeting certain conditions,
the owner would be required to annex the propert y into the city’s
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 or into a separate new CFD,
which would provide financing for police protection services.
The environmental effect of providing police protection services is
associated with the physical impacts of providing new and expanded
facilities. The specific impacts of providing new and expanded facilities
cannot be determined at this time, as the General Plan Update does not
propose or authorize development nor does it designate specific sites for
new or expanded public facilities. If new police facilities are needed to serve
growth associated with future development anticipated by the General Plan
Update, the facilities would most likely be provided on sites with land use
designations that allow such uses and the environmental impacts of
constructing and operating the facilities would likely be similar to those
associated with new development, redevelopment, and infrastructure
projects under the General Plan Update. Any future development under the
General Plan Update would be required to comply with regulations,
policies, and standards included in the General Plan Update, and would be
subject to CEQA review as appropriate. Therefore, impacts related to the
provision of police protection services are less than significant.
Findings
Page 129 of 266
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.5: Public Services for Quality of Life. Maintain appropriate sites for
institutional and public facility uses that can accommodate the infrastructure and facilities
needed to serve the community.
Policy LU-2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City
requirements.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Action PS-5d: Adopt a level of service standard for police protection. Protect residents
and businesses from criminal activity by providing the adopted level of service and
educating the public about methods to reduce criminal activity. During the annual budget
and CIP process, review the level of service standard and revise as appropriate.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-6: Public Safety Resources. A community that safeguards persons and property
through the provision of high-quality public safety services and crime prevention measures.
Goal RM-9: Infrastructure Planning. A community that provides adequate, reliable
infrastructure and facilities to support existing and future development.
Policy RM-6.1: Provision of Police and Fire Services. Encourage the Riverside County
Sheriff’s Department and the Riverside County Fire Department to maintain adequate staff
and equipment to provide efficient, high quality, and responsive public safety services to
the San Jacinto community.
Policy RM-6.5: Crime Prevention. Promote and support community-based crime
prevention programs, such as community policing, public education, youth crime
prevention, and outreach programs, as an important tool to the provision of professional
police services.
Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the
timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.
Findings
Page 130 of 266
Policy RM-9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its
fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreatio nal
amenities, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas
targeted for near-term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities
through the orderly extension of infrastructure.
Policy RM-9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new
development.
Action RM-6a: Adopt and maintain level of service (e.g., response times, call handling)
and staffing standards as well as a developer fee program for the Police Department.
Review the level of services and funding levels at budget time, adjusting when necessary
to ensure that adequate levels of service and facilities are provided and maintained based
on short-term and long-term growth projections. Future developers will contribute funds
for police services through the adopted developer fees.
Action RM-6b: Continue to work with the school districts to provide School Resource
Officers (SROs) to assist the school districts with safety and security concerns. Review the
success of the program and funding/staffing levels on an annual basis, adjusting when
necessary to ensure that adequate levels of service are provided and maintained.
Action RM-6d: During the development review process, require design features that
reduce the potential for crime. New projects should:
a. Provide well-lighted and visible streets and street names, building entrances and
addresses, common areas, and parking facilities.
b. Limit access into and between buildings to reduce escape routes and to make
undetected entry difficult.
c. Provide landscaping that permits the natural surveillance of open areas and
entryways, and avoids creating places for concealment.
d. Be designed to permit emergency vehicle access to all sides of buildings located in
multi-family and non-residential developments.
e. Be designed to allow for defensible space.
Action RM-6e: Work with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department to promote the
establishment and operation of Neighborhood Watch programs throughout the City.
Consider assigning a police officer or volunteer patrol person to each Neighborhood Watch
group for assistance in launching and maintaining a successful program.
Findings
Page 131 of 266
3. Schools
Threshold: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives
for any of the public services: Schools?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact PS-3, pages 5.15-24 through 5.15-
28)
Explanation: Implementation of the General Plan Update could result in the development
of up to 16,252 dwelling units (estimated reduction of 519 single-family
units and an increase of 16,771 multi-family units) over existing conditions.
Assuming all new development anticipated under the proposed General
Plan Update occurs within SJUSD’s school boundary, the Project would
generate approximately 10,895 students (5,463 elementary school students,
2,613 middle school students, and 2,818 high school students). SJUSD does
not currently have excess capacity at the elementary or middle school levels,
or have excess capacity overall. The high schools have an excess capacity
of 382 seats, but as shown, that capacity is not sufficient for future growth
assumed under the General Plan Update. As such, based on the conservative
assumption that all 16,252 residential units would be constructed within
SJUSD’s school boundary, SJUSD would not be able to adequately
accommodate the increase in student population. Therefore, new facilities
would need to be created, or existing facilities would need to be expanded,
to accommodate for future population growth. It is likely that some portion
of the proposed residential units would fall under the jurisdiction of Hemet
Unified School District (HUSD) or Nuview Union School District (NUSD).
The HUSD and NUSD Fee Justification Studies provide a framework to
expand school facilities to accommodate future growth within the Districts.
The exact location of future development and associated student generation
is currently unknown. However, future development projected within the
General Plan Update is anticipated to occur gradually through 2040 and
would be largely based on market demand. Thus, any increase in demand
for school services would occur gradually as additional development occurs
in the Study Area. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions,
to ensure that adequate services are provided to serve growth associated
with implementation of the General Plan Update. Policy LU-1.5 ensures the
City maintains appropriate sites for institutional and public facility uses that
can accommodate the infrastructure and facilities needed to serve the
community. Policy RM-8.2 directs the City to work with developers and the
school district to ensure the payment of fees, construction, and expansion
of school facilities to address expected increases in school-age population.
Policy RM-9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in
Findings
Page 132 of 266
collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to
ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to
identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement
improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Policy RM-
9.3 ensures that all new development provides for and funds its fair share of
the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure, services, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.5 ensures collaboration with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan
for new development. Action RM-8a ensures the City will continue to work
with school districts to ensure adequate school facilities are provided and
maintained in the community, including the requirement for development
projects to mitigate school impacts.
School districts assess development impact fees against residential and non-
residential development to mitigate impacts resulting from the increase in
demand for school related services. Individual development projects in
accordance with the General Plan Update would be required to pay the
statutory fees, so that school facilities can be constructed/expanded, if
necessary, at the nearest sites to accommodate the impact of project-
generated students, reducing impacts to a less than significant level.
The environmental effect of providing school services is associated with the
physical impacts of providing new and expanded facilities. The specific
impacts of providing new and expanded facilities cannot be determined at
this time, as the General Plan Update does not propose or authorize
development of new or expanded school facilities. If the school districts
serving the City determine that new school facilities are needed to serve
growth associated with future development anticipated by the General Plan
Update, the schools would most likely be provided on sites with land use
designations that allow such uses and the environmental impacts of
constructing and operating the facilities would likely be similar to those
associated with new development, redevelopment, and infrastructure
projects under the General Plan Update. Any future development under the
General Plan Update would be required to comply with regulations,
policies, and standards included in the General Plan Update, and
development of school facilities would be subject to CEQA review as
appropriate. Therefore, impacts related to the provision of schools are less
than significant. Overall, increased cooperation and coordination between
the City and school districts would ensure high-quality school and
community facilities throughout San Jacinto and would not result in
significant impacts to school facilities. As such, the General Plan Update
would result in a less than significant impact on school services and
facilities.
Findings
Page 133 of 266
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.5: Public Services for Quality of Life. Maintain appropriate sites for
institutional and public facility uses that can accommodate the infrastructure and facilities
needed to serve the community.
Policy LU-2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City
requirements.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-8: Educational Resources. A community that supports the continued lifelong
learning of all its residents with high-quality educational facilities and opportunities.
Goal RM-9: Infrastructure Planning. A community that provides adequate, reliable
infrastructure and facilities to support existing and future development.
Policy RM-6.4: School Safety. Collaborate with San Jacinto schools to support the
community’s youth through high quality after-school/summer programs, psychological
counseling, and education about online safety.
Policy RM-8.2: School Facilities. Work with developers and the school district to ensure
the payment of fees, construction, and expansion of school facilities to address expected
increases in school-age population.
Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the
timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.
Policy RM-9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its
fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational
amenities, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas
targeted for near-term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities
through the orderly extension of infrastructure.
Findings
Page 134 of 266
Policy RM-9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new
development.
Action RM-8a: Continue to work with the school districts to ensure adequate school
facilities are provided and maintained in the community. Specifically, the City should:
During the processing of residential and non-residential development proposals,
ensure the school districts are consulted regarding the potential impact of the
project on educational services and facilities. When proposed developments cannot
be served by existing facilities and services, the City shall work with the developer
and the school district in exploring options for service provision and facility
funding.
Prior to approving a project that is likely to generate students, require the applicant
to mitigate school impacts to the full extent permitted by State law through land
dedications, payment of fees, participation in a special assessment district, or any
combination of the above.
Cooperate with school districts to update population projections, student generation
formulas, potential school sites, and facilities improvement plans in their Long
Range Facility and Master Plans.
Work with school districts to expedite the construction of new schools, when
necessary.
Cooperate with school districts and recommend appropriate sites for new school
development as proposals for new school facilities come forward.
4. Libraries
Threshold: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives
for any of the public services: Library Facilities?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact PS-4, pages 5.15-28 through 5.15-
30)
Explanation: Development accommodated under the General Plan Update would result
in additional residents and businesses in the City. An increase in population
residents and businesses would increase the demand for public services,
including library services. The San Jacinto Library is owned and operated
by the Riverside County Library System (RCLS). Future development
projected in the General Plan Update may result in the need for additional
RCLS resources (i.e., additional staffing, equipment, expanded/new
facilities). At this time, it is unknown whether RCLS would need to expand
Findings
Page 135 of 266
or construct new facilities to meet the demand of future development in the
Study Area. Future development is assumed to occur over time through
2040; thus, any increase in demand for library services would occur
gradually as additional development and associated population growth is
added to the City. The County’s library system would continue receiving
support for library facilities and resources through the General Plan Update
policies and actions. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions
to ensure that library services are adequately funded, are coordinated
between the City and the RCLS, and that new development funds its fair
share of services. Policy LU-1.5 ensures the City maintains appropriate
sites for institutional and public facility uses that can accommodate the
infrastructure and facilities needed to serve the community. Policy LU-2.1
ensures that new development corresponds to the provision of
infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements. Policy
RM-8.6 ensures the City will work closely with the Riverside County
Library System to provide library facilities and services necessary to meet
the needs of all segments of the community. Policy RM-9.1 maintains and
implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate
outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with
appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities
and services in San Jacinto. Policy RM-9.3 ensures that all new
development provides for and funds its fair share of the costs for the
expansion of public infrastructure, services, and facilities. Policy RM-9.5
ensures collaboration with the various regional facility and service
providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for
new development. Action RM-8c ensures that library development keeps
pace with overall City development and population growth and, as part of
the development review process, ensures developers pay all required library
fees prior to occupancy of their projects.
The environmental effect of providing library services is associated with the
physical impacts of providing new and expanded facilities. The specific
impacts of providing new and expanded facilities cannot be determined at
this time, as the General Plan Update does not propose or authorize
development nor does it designate specific sites for new or expanded public
facilities. However, the facilities would be primarily provided on sites with
land use designations that allow such uses and the environmental impacts
of constructing and operating the facilities would likely be similar to those
associated with new development, redevelopment, and infrastructure
projects under the General Plan Update. Any future development under the
General Plan Update would be required to comply with regulations,
policies, and standards included in the General Plan Update, and would be
subject to CEQA review as appropriate. Therefore, impacts related to the
provision of library services are less than significant.
Findings
Page 136 of 266
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.5: Public Services for Quality of Life. Maintain appropriate sites for
institutional and public facility uses that can accommodate the infrastructure and facilities
needed to serve the community.
Policy LU-2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City
requirements.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-9: Infrastructure Planning. A community that provides adequate, reliable
infrastructure and facilities to support existing and future development.
Policy RM-8.6: Libraries. Work closely with the Riverside County Library System to
provide library facilities and services necessary to meet the needs of all segments of the
community.
Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the
timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.
Policy RM-9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its
fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational
amenities, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas
targeted for near-term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities
through the orderly extension of infrastructure.
Policy RM-9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new
development.
Action RM-8c: Continue to work with the Riverside County Library System to ensure that
library development keeps pace with overall City development and population growth. As
part of the development review process, ensure developers pay all required library fees
prior to occupancy of their projects.
Findings
Page 137 of 266
5. Parks
Threshold: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives
for any of the public services: Parks?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact PS-5, page 5.15-30)
Explanation: Refer to Recreation below.
O. RECREATION
1. Increased Use of Parks/Recreation Facilities
Threshold: Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact REC-1, pages 5.16-7 through
5.16-13)
Explanation: 2040 buildout under the General Plan Update could yield a net change over
existing conditions of an additional 16,252 housing units, an additional
population of 54,280 people, an additional 21,839,634 square feet of non-
residential building square footage, and an additional 19,674 jobs within the
Study Area. These new residents are expected to use park and recreational
facilities, and this additional use may result in greater demands on parks and
recreational facilities in the Study Area such that deterioration of these
facilities could occur or be accelerated. The additional demand on existing
parks and recreational facilities would increase the need for maintenance
and improvements. These improvements could have environmental
impacts, although the exact impacts cannot be determined since the
potential improvements are currently unknown.
The provision of new parks and recreation facilities would reduce the
potential for adverse impacts and physical deterioration of existing parks
and recreation facilities, by providing additional facilities to accommodate
the demand for parks and recreation facilities. These new facilities would
be provided at a pace and in locations appropriate to serve new
development, as required to maintain the City adopted standard for park
space acreage at five acres for every 1,000 residents.
Development under the General Plan would indirectly lead to the
construction of new parks and recreation facilities to serve new growth and
Findings
Page 138 of 266
to meet existing parks and recreation needs. The General Plan Update
supports the creation of new parks and recreation facilities, including new
parks and trails, to accommodate a wide range of activities for all age
groups. Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated open space
system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource
conservation, recreation, aesthetics, and community identity. Policy RM-
7.1 directs the City to collaborate with the Valley-Wide Recreation and Park
District and other organizations to provide parks, recreational, and open
space facilities that meet the needs and preferences of all segments of the
community. Policy RM-7.2 ensures parks and recreational facilities are
distributed throughout the community so that most residents are within
walking distance (one-half mile) of a public open space and prioritizes the
development of new public spaces in areas outside of this service radius.
Policy RM-7.3 encourage the use of less developable or undevelopable
lands such as utility corridors, fault zones, flood control facilities, channels,
and easements for recreational uses, when feasible. Policy RM-7.4 requires
future private development to incorporate parkland, open space, or green
space to expand recreational opportunities in the community in accordance
with standards set by the San Jacinto Municipal Code. Policy RM-7.8
ensures collaboration with school districts and other agencies to develop
cooperative programs where the joint use of facilities would lead to
enhanced and more efficient facility utilization. Policy RM-7.9 encourage
outdoor gathering spaces, such as mini-parks and plazas, to be incorporated
into nonresidential development. Policy RM-7.10 directs the City to
actively pursue financing for parkland acquisition and maintenance, and
allocate sufficient funding to park development to support the community’s
recreational needs. Policy RM-9.3 ensures that all new development
provides for and funds its fair share of the costs for the expansion of public
infrastructure and services, recreational amenities, and facilities. Action
RM-7a ensures the City will review development proposals for their
potential demand for and impact on parks and recreational facilities in the
community, requiring developers of residential projects to provide adequate
parkland equal to five acres per 1,000 residents and developers of non-
residential development to provide parkland equal to 2.5 acres per 1,000
employees, or pay an in-lieu fee prior to occupancy of the project. Action
RM-7b encourages projects located along the river levees or fault zones, or
that include drainage courses, utility easements, and/or flood control
facilities, to provide easements to the appropriate agency for the provision
of linear parks, pathways, horseback riding trails, and/or hiking and biking
trails within these areas. Action RM-7g maintains an up-to-date inventory
of developed and proposed public park land and residences outside of one-
half mile of a public park so that new park development can be directed to
those areas. These new parks and recreation facilities would be distributed
throughout areas proximate to new development in and around existing
neighborhoods. Neighborhood and community parks and trails would
Findings
Page 139 of 266
generally be accommodated in the Open Space and Park land use
designations.
The City currently provides approximately 3.39 acres of parkland for every
1,000 people. The existing deficit in park land is currently being offset with
the recreational opportunities available in two golf courses, the San Jacinto
River Park, the Diamond Valley Lake recreational area, and other nearby
regional parks. Based on the City’s adopted standard of five acres per 1,000
residents, the increase in population due to implementation of the General
Plan Update would require approximately 271.4 acres of additional
parkland, for a total of 535.76 acres of parkland, assuming a population of
107,152. It should be noted that new development would be required to fund
its fair share for required parkland but would not make up for existing
system deficiencies.
The General Plan Update includes 176 acres of the Park land use
designation and 6,188 acres of the Open Space land use designation. The
Open Space land use designation allows for hiking, biking and equestrian
trails; and outdoor recreational facilities, it also allows for passive and
active recreation sites operated by the City and regional agencies.
In addition to ensuring that new and expanded parks and recreation facilities
are provided to accommodate new growth, the General Plan Update
includes policies and actions to ensure that parks and recreation facilities
are adequately maintained and improved to serve both existing and planned
growth. Policy LU-2.1 ensures that new development corresponds to the
provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and
that new development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements.
Policy LU-1.6 supports the provision of outdoor gathering places such as
plazas, green space, and squares. Policy RM-7.5 requires that parks and
recreational facilities be well-maintained by the responsible agency. Policy
RM-7.10 directs the City to actively pursue financing for parkland
acquisition and maintenance, and allocate sufficient funding to park
development to support the community’s recreational needs. Policy RM-9.1
maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with
appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance
with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify
infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for
public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Policy RM-9.2 maintains and
finances the capital improvement program to ensure the timely
implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the timely
provision of public facility and municipal improvements. Policy RM-9.5
ensures collaboration with the various regional facility and service
providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for
new development. Action RM-7d directs the City to pursue available
resources to fund recreation facilities and parkland acquisition,
Findings
Page 140 of 266
development, and maintenance, including but not limited to, State and
federal grants, special districts, private donations, gifts, and endowments.
Although implementation of the General Plan Update would cause an
incremental increase in demand for parks in the future, this increase could
be further reduced to a less than significant level by the provision of public
parkland and private on-site recreational amenities and through the payment
of park fees, as established in Municipal Code Chapter 15.36, Park and
Open Space Development Fees. Compliance with and the implementation
of applicable General Plan Update policies and actions and compliance with
the City Municipal Code would ensure parks and recreational facilities
would not be overused to the point of substantial deterioration.
The General Plan Update does not propose or approve the construction or
expansion of parks or recreational facilities. Any new parks or recreational
facilities that may be constructed in the future would be primarily provided
on sites with land use designations that allow such uses and the
environmental impacts of constructing and operating the parks and
recreational facilities would likely be similar to those associated with new
development, redevelopment, and infrastructure projects under the General
Plan. Any future development under the General Plan Update would be
required to comply with regulations, policies, and standards included in the
General Plan Update, and would be subject to CEQA review as appropriate.
Therefore, impacts to parks and recreational facilities associated with
implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.5: Public Services for Quality of Life. Maintain appropriate sites for
institutional and public facility uses that can accommodate the infrastructure and facilities
needed to serve the community.
Policy LU-1.6: Gathering Spaces. Support the provision of attractive outdoor gathering
places such as plazas, green space, and squares to strengthen social engagement and
provide visual relief in developed areas.
Policy LU-2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City
requirements.
Policy LU-5.4: Gathering Places. Encourage the provision of both formal and informal
public gathering spaces through pedestrian-oriented street design; sidewalk furniture and
pedestrian-oriented development; well-designed, multi-use public spaces of different sizes
including pocket parks, plazas, and monuments; and community events.
Findings
Page 141 of 266
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-7: Parks and Recreational Resources. An integrated system of parks,
recreational, and open space facilities that meet the community’s needs and preferences.
Goal RM-9: Infrastructure Planning. A community that provides adequate, reliable
infrastructure and facilities to support existing and future development.
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-7.1: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the Valley-Wide Recreation and
Park District and other organizations to provide parks, recreational, and open space
facilities that meet the needs and preferences of all segments of the community.
Policy RM-7.2: Service Area. Locate and distribute parks and recreational facilities
throughout the community so that most residents are within walking distance (one-half
mile) of a public open space and prioritize the development of new public spaces in areas
outside of this service radius.
Policy RM-7.3: New Facilities. Encourage the use of less developable or undevelopable
lands such as utility corridors, fault zones, flood control facilities, channels, and easements
for recreational uses, when feasible.
Policy RM-7.4: Parkland Dedication. Require future private development to incorporate
parkland, open space, or green space to expand recreational opportunities in the community
in accordance with standards set by the San Jacinto Municipal Code.
Policy RM-7.5: Maintenance. Require that parks and recreational facilities be well-
maintained by the responsible agency.
Policy RM-7.6: Safety. Enhance park safety through playground design, crime prevention
technology, night lighting, natural surveillance, unobtrusive landscaping, and increased
public safety patrols.
Policy RM-7.7: Accessible Facilities. Require that new park facility construction and
existing facility retrofits meet accessibility standards defined by the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and playground safety requirements (Senate Bill 2733).
Policy RM-7.8: Joint Use Facilities. Collaborate with school districts and other agencies
to develop cooperative programs where the joint use of facilities would lead to enhanced
and more efficient facility utilization.
Policy RM-7.9: Open Space in Nonresidential Development. Encourage outdoor
gathering spaces, such as mini-parks and plazas, be incorporated into nonresidential
development to encourage social interaction, create experience-oriented centers, and
enhance the visual character of the community.
Findings
Page 142 of 266
Policy RM-7.10: Parkland Funding. Actively pursue financing for parkland acquisition
and maintenance, and allocate sufficient funding to park development to support the
community’s recreational needs.
Policy RM-7.11: Community Support. Collaborate with residents to ensure the City’s
park and recreation facilities and programs reflect community preferences
Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the
timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.
Policy RM-9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its
fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational
amenities, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas
targeted for near-term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities
through the orderly extension of infrastructure.
Policy RM-9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new
development.
Action RM-1a: Work with public and private agencies to explore the joint venture use and
management of open space areas.
Action RM-7a: Review development proposals for their potential demand for and impact
on parks and recreational facilities in the community by:
• Requiring developers of residential projects to provide adequate parkland equal to
five acres per 1,000 residents (0.005 acre per resident), or pay an in-lieu fee prior
to occupancy of the project.
• Requiring non-residential development to provide parkland equal to 2.5 acres per
1,000 employees (0.0025 acre per employee), or pay an in lieu fee prior to
occupancy of the project.
• Work with developers to identify the appropriate park type(s), size(s), facilities, and
location(s) for required park facilities.
• Ensure parkland facilities conform with City standards.
Findings
Page 143 of 266
Action RM-7b: For projects located along the river levees or fault zones, or that include
drainage courses, utility easements, and/or flood control facilities, encourage the project to
provide easements to the appropriate agency (the City of San Jacinto, homeowners
association, Valleywide or other agency) for the provision of linear parks, pathways,
horseback riding trails, and/or hiking and biking trails within these areas, linking to the
regional park and trail system where possible.
Action RM-7c: Cooperate with joint power authorities, special districts, and regional,
State, and federal agencies to explore the development of a regional park that includes
facilities such as hiking trails, camping, and fishing opportunities.
Action RM-7d: Pursue available resources to fund recreation facilities and parkland
acquisition, development, and maintenance, including but not limited to, State and federal
grants, special districts, private donations, gifts, and endowments.
Action RM-7e: Cooperate with the Valley-Wide Recreation and Park District, Mount San
Jacinto Community College, and other public and private service providers to identify
additional needed senior and youth programs and services in the community. Work with
these organizations to develop programs and expand access to and participation in senior
and youth programs without duplicating efforts. Encourage the use of public transit and
alternative modes of travel to these facilities and programs.
Action RM-7f: As more schools are built within the City, maximize the joint use of
facilities by the City and the local school districts, including joint school/park sites, joint
use of athletic fields, community meeting facilities, and provision of child and senior care
facilities, where feasible.
Action RM-7g: Maintain an up-to-date inventory of developed and proposed public park
land and residences outside of one-half mile of a public park so that new park development
can be directed to those areas.
2. Construction and Expansion of Parks/Recreation Facilities
Threshold: Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact REC-2, pages 5.16-7 through
5.16-13)
Explanation: The General Plan Update designates a total of 175 acres as Parks and 6,188
acres as Open Space. No site-specific projects are proposed under the
General Plan Update. Based on the anticipated 2040 buildout population of
107,152, which results in an increase of approximately 54,280 people, a
total need of 535.76 acres of parkland will be needed to comply with the
City’s park standard of five acres per 1,000 people. Construction of these
future parks could result in environmental impacts, including disturbances
Findings
Page 144 of 266
or conversion of habitat, water pollution during construction, increased
noise levels, and an increase in impermeable surfaces. At the time future
parks are proposed, they would require a separate environmental review and
compliance with regulations in existence at that time would address
potential environmental impacts related to the construction and operation of
new parks. Furthermore, these future parks would be subject to General Plan
Update policies and actions intended to protect the environment and the
programmatic mitigation framework established in this EIR. Policy LU-2.1
ensures that new development corresponds to the provision of
infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements. Policy
LU-1.6 supports the provision of outdoor gathering places such as plazas,
green space, and squares. Policy RM-7.4 requires future private
development to incorporate parkland, open space, or green space to expand
recreational opportunities in the community in accordance with standards
set by the San Jacinto Municipal Code. Action RM-7a ensures the City will
review development proposals for their potential demand for and impact on
parks and recreational facilities in the community, requiring developers of
residential projects to provide adequate parkland equal to five acres per
1,000 residents and developers of non-residential development to provide
parkland equal to 2.5 acres per 1,000 employees, or pay an in-lieu fee prior
to occupancy of the project. Therefore, with compliance to environmental
regulations established at the time of future park and recreational projects
are proposed, and adherence to General Plan Update policies and actions,
the environmental impacts associated with the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities would less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.5: Public Services for Quality of Life. Maintain appropriate sites for
institutional and public facility uses that can accommodate the infrastructure and facilities
needed to serve the community.
Policy LU-1.6: Gathering Spaces. Support the provision of attractive outdoor gathering
places such as plazas, green space, and squares to strengthen social engagement and
provide visual relief in developed areas.
Policy LU-2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City
requirements.
Policy LU-5.4: Gathering Places. Encourage the provision of both formal and informal
public gathering spaces through pedestrian-oriented street design; sidewalk furniture and
pedestrian-oriented development; well-designed, multi-use public spaces of different sizes
Findings
Page 145 of 266
including pocket parks, plazas, and monuments; and community events.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-7: Parks and Recreational Resources. An integrated system of parks,
recreational, and open space facilities that meet the community’s needs and preferences.
Goal RM-9: Infrastructure Planning. A community that provides adequate, reliable
infrastructure and facilities to support existing and future development.
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-7.1: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the Valley-Wide Recreation and
Park District and other organizations to provide parks, recreational, and open space
facilities that meet the needs and preferences of all segments of the community.
Policy RM-7.2: Service Area. Locate and distribute parks and recreational facilities
throughout the community so that most residents are within walking distance (one-half
mile) of a public open space and prioritize the development of new public spaces in areas
outside of this service radius.
Policy RM-7.3: New Facilities. Encourage the use of less developable or undevelopable
lands such as utility corridors, fault zones, flood control facilities, channels, and easements
for recreational uses, when feasible.
Policy RM-7.4: Parkland Dedication. Require future private development to incorporate
parkland, open space, or green space to expand recreational opportunities in the community
in accordance with standards set by the San Jacinto Municipal Code.
Policy RM-7.6: Safety. Enhance park safety through playground design, crime prevention
technology, night lighting, natural surveillance, unobtrusive landscaping, and increased
public safety patrols.
Policy RM-7.7: Accessible Facilities. Require that new park facility construction and
existing facility retrofits meet accessibility standards defined by the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and playground safety requirements (Senate Bill 2733).
Policy RM-7.8: Joint Use Facilities. Collaborate with school districts and other agencies
to develop cooperative programs where the joint use of facilities would lead to enhanced
and more efficient facility utilization.
Policy RM-7.9: Open Space in Nonresidential Development. Encourage outdoor
gathering spaces, such as mini-parks and plazas, be incorporated into nonresidential
development to encourage social interaction, create experience-oriented centers, and
enhance the visual character of the community.
Findings
Page 146 of 266
Policy RM-7.10: Parkland Funding. Actively pursue financing for parkland acquisition
and maintenance, and allocate sufficient funding to park development to support the
community’s recreational needs.
Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the
timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.
Policy RM-9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its
fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational
amenities, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas
targeted for near-term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities
through the orderly extension of infrastructure.
Policy RM-9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new
development.
Action RM-1a: Work with public and private agencies to explore the joint venture use and
management of open space areas.
Action RM-7a: Review development proposals for their potential demand for and impact
on parks and recreational facilities in the community by:
• Requiring developers of residential projects to provide adequate parkland equal to
five acres per 1,000 residents (0.005 acre per resident), or pay an in-lieu fee prior
to occupancy of the project.
• Requiring non-residential development to provide parkland equal to 2.5 acres per
1,000 employees (0.0025 acre per employee), or pay an in lieu fee prior to
occupancy of the project.
• Work with developers to identify the appropriate park type(s), size(s), facilities, and
location(s) for required park facilities.
• Ensure parkland facilities conform with City standards.
Action RM-7b: For projects located along the river levees or fault zones, or that include
drainage courses, utility easements, and/or flood control facilities, encourage the project to
provide easements to the appropriate agency (the City of San Jacinto, homeowners
Findings
Page 147 of 266
association, Valleywide or other agency) for the provision of linear parks, pathways,
horseback riding trails, and/or hiking and biking trails within these areas, linking to the
regional park and trail system where possible.
Action RM-7c: Cooperate with joint power authorities, special districts, and regional,
State, and federal agencies to explore the development of a regional park that includes
facilities such as hiking trails, camping, and fishing opportunities.
Action RM-7d: Pursue available resources to fund recreation facilities and parkland
acquisition, development, and maintenance, including but not limited to, State and federal
grants, special districts, private donations, gifts, and endowments.
Action RM-7e: Cooperate with the Valley-Wide Recreation and Park District, Mount San
Jacinto Community College, and other public and private service providers to identify
additional needed senior and youth programs and services in the community. Work with
these organizations to develop programs and expand access to and participation in senior
and youth programs without duplicating efforts. Encourage the use of public transit and
alternative modes of travel to these facilities and programs.
Action RM-7g: Maintain an up-to-date inventory of developed and proposed public park
land and residences outside of one-half mile of a public park so that new park development
can be directed to those areas.
P. TRANSPORTATION
1. Circulation System Conflicts
Threshold: Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadways, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact TR-1, pages 5.17-17 through 5.17-
21)
Explanation: Circulation System
The Project includes adoption of a new Circulation map that redefines and
consolidates the City’s roadway classifications. As a result, some roadways
are reclassified to better describe their intended function related to access
and mobility. The Land Use, Economic Development, and Mobility
Elements developed as part of the General Plan Update contain several
policies that support access to and the performance of transit, bicycle, and
pedestrian facilities. Specifically, proposed Mobility Element Policy M-1.5
encourages roadway, sidewalk, and median improvements that promotes
pedestrian and bicycle safety. Proposed Mobility Element Goal M-3
encourages the planning and design of complete streets with policies that
promote consideration for all users within all facility types. Policy M-3.2
Findings
Page 148 of 266
promotes the incorporation of facilities and design features into
transportation improvement projects that support the use of public transit
and active transportation, such as walking and biking. The proposed Land
Use Element includes Policy LU-1.1 which promotes an appropriate land
use plan that promotes efficient development and multiple transportation
options. Policy LU-2.2 encourages new development to occur in infill
locations in a balanced and efficient pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves
open space, and creates convenient connections to other land uses and
activity centers. Policy LU-4.4 supports pedestrian-friendly and pedestrian-
scaled development that encourages more social interaction and less
automobile use, especially in the Downtown Village. Proposed Economic
Development Element Policy ED-3.1 encourages higher density housing
and higher intensity employment space to locate in mixed-use formats along
the City’s commercial corridors, near transit nodes, and in areas well-served
by the City’s multimodal transportation network. As a result,
implementation of the General Plan Update would not conflict with
applicable plans, polices, or ordinances related to vehicle circulation, and
its impact is considered less than significant.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation
The City of San Jacinto does not have an adopted bicycle or pedestrian
master plan or defined measures of effectiveness for bicycle and pedestrian
circulation. Proposed updated roadway classifications include descriptions
of appropriate design features for people biking and walking in line with
multimodal City goals. The updated Mobility Element includes
recommended improvements from the Trails Master Plan, which if
incorporated would improve bicycle and pedestrian circulation Citywide.
The recommended trails and bicycle facilities are proposed as part of the
proposed General Plan Update and are identified in the Trails Master Plan.
Additionally, the Mobility Element developed as part of the plan update
contains several policies that support access to and the performance bicycle
and pedestrian facilities. The proposed Mobility Element contains Goal M-
4 which supports an extensive and regionally linked network of trails,
bicycle lanes, and sidewalk paths that encourage active transportation, such
as walking and bicycling, as viable for transportation and recreation.
Mobility Element Policy M-4.3 encourages the use of open space and utility
easements for bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian trails. Policy M-4.5
encourages new development in the City to provide bicycle parking,
lockers, and other support facilities for bicyclists. Therefore, the Project’s
impact is considered less than significant.
Public Transit System
The City does not have defined measures of effectiveness for public transit
service and circulation. The proposed General Plan Update would be
expected to increase demand for travel given the proposed development and
Findings
Page 149 of 266
expected increase in residents and employees. This population and job
growth within the City could increase the demand for public transit but also
resulting in increased levels of vehicular traffic which could slow transit
operations and impact transit reliability. The Mobility Element developed
as part of the General Plan Update includes policies to support and enhance
transit service. Specifically, Mobility Element Policy M-2.4 promotes
public transportation programs that effectively serve the City’s residents
and workers by connecting users to local and regional destinations,
including jobs, recreation, retail and other activity centers. Therefore, the
General Plan Update’s impact is considered less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and
enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes
efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse
gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures
compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this
Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).
Policy LU-2.2: Infill Development. Encourage new development to occur in infill
locations in a balanced and efficient pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves open space, and
creates convenient connections to other land uses and activity centers.
Policy LU-4.4: Pedestrian Design. Support pedestrian-friendly and pedestrian-scaled
development that encourages more social interaction and less automobile use, especially
in the Downtown Village.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT
Policy ED-3.2: Higher Intensity Development. Encourage higher density housing and
higher intensity employment space to locate in mixed-use formats along the City’s
commercial corridors, near transit nodes, and in areas well-served by the City’s multimodal
transportation network.
Policy ED-3.3: Regional Coordination. Coordinate local infrastructure investments and
initiatives with regional transportation improvements that enhance major corridors and
nodes.
Policy ED-4.3: Mixed-Use. Encourage the development and integration of a mix of uses
in a “main street” setting that includes retail anchored stores, entertainment, office, retail,
residential at various densities, and transit-oriented development and/or mix uses that
provide regional draw.
Findings
Page 150 of 266
MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.1: Balanced Circulation System: Provide for a balanced circulation system
that promotes the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City.
Policy M-1.2: Access and Mobility: Strive to maintain sufficient access and mobility for
all modes of travel and users of the roadway network.
Policy M-1.5: Transportation Improvements for All Users: Encourage roadway,
sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway
system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety.
Action M-1a: Periodically review and assess the vehicular operating conditions along City
facilities to determine what, if any, improvements are warranted to maintain a safe and
efficient flow of traffic in the City. Improvements may be identified and included in the
City’s Capital Improvement Plan and/or required as part of project approval through the
development review process.
Policy M-2.4: Public Transit: Promote public transportation programs that effectively
serve the City's residents and workers by connecting users to local and regional
destinations, including jobs, recreation, retail, and other activity centers.
Goal M-3: Complete Streets. A multi-modal transportation network that provides
sufficient vehicular, pedestrian, bike and transit facilities.
Policy M-3.1: Complete Streets: Apply context-sensitive complete streets principles to
new roadways and to transportation improvements to serve all modes of travel and users
of all ages and abilities.
Policy M-3.2: Multimodal Facilities: Incorporate facilities and design features into
transportation improvement projects that support the use of public transit and active
transportation.
Policy M-3.3: Multimodal Connectivity: Link commercial development, employment
centers, public facilities, and community parks and open spaces to transit and active
transportation facilities and trails, wherever feasible.
Policy M-3.6: Park and Ride Facilities: Encourage the provision of regional public
transportation services and support facilities such as park and ride lots.
Goal M-4: Active Transportation. An extensive and regionally linked network of trails,
bicycle lanes, and sidewalk paths that encourage active transportation as viable for
transportation and recreation.
Policy M-4.1: Trails Master Plan: Implement applicable goals, policies, and projects
from the Trails Master Plan to provide trails and multimodal facilities that support active
transportation within and beyond the City.
Findings
Page 151 of 266
Policy M-4.2: Active Transportation Network: Provide and maintain an extensive active
transportation and trail network that supports bicycles, pedestrians, and equestrians and is
linked to regional facilities and facilities of adjacent jurisdictions.
Policy M-4.3: Trail Development: Encourage the use of open space and utility easements
for bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian trails, where feasible.
Policy M-4.4: Trail Connectivity: Encourage Specific Plans and Planned Developments
to include well-developed and designed trails that connect neighborhoods to parks, schools,
jobs, and adjacent existing or planned local and/or regional trails.
Policy M-4.5: Support Facilities: Encourage new developments to provide bicycle
parking, lockers, and other support facilities for bicyclists.
2. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)
Threshold: Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact TR-2, pages 5.17-21 through 5.17-
25)
Explanation: The General Plan Update is not expected to increase VMT per person above
the current General Plan/No Project conditions. Total VMT per service
population is expected to decrease almost 12 percent under the General Plan
Update in comparison to No Project conditions. The Land Use and Mobility
elements developed as part of the General Plan Update includes policies to
support the reduction of VMT, including increasing the balanced mix of
residential and employment opportunities within the City with the proposed
land uses. Specifically, the proposed Land Use Element includes Policy LU-
1.1 which promotes an appropriate land use plan that promotes efficient
development and multiple transportation options. Policy LU-2.2 encourages
new development to occur in infill locations in a balanced and efficient
pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves open space, and creates convenient
connections to other land uses and activity centers. Policy LU-4.4 supports
pedestrian-friendly and pedestrian-scaled development that encourages
more social interaction and less automobile use, especially in the
Downtown Village. The proposed Mobility Element includes Goal M-6
which promotes transportation management strategies that comply with the
County Congestion Management Plan and regional and Statewide
greenhouse gas emissions targets. Mobility Element Policy M-6.1 supports
maintaining VMT thresholds and TDM mitigation requirements for the
purposes of environmental review under CEQA. Policy M-6.2 encourages
the creation and implementation of TDM and congestion management
mitigation measures in areas experiencing high levels of congestion and
VMT levels. Additionally, Mobility Element Policy M-6.4 promotes
working with developers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and minimize
Findings
Page 152 of 266
congestion related to new development through improvements to the
circulation system and on-site improvements that encourage non-vehicular
modes of travel. Therefore, the VMT-related impacts of the General Plan
Update would be considered less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and
enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes
efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse
gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures
compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this
Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).
Policy LU-2.2: Infill Development. Encourage new development to occur in infill
locations in a balanced and efficient pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves open space, and
creates convenient connections to other land uses and activity centers.
Policy LU-4.4: Pedestrian Design. Support pedestrian-friendly and pedestrian-scaled
development that encourages more social interaction and less automobile use, especially
in the Downtown Village.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT
Policy ED-3.2: Higher Intensity Development. Encourage higher density housing and
higher intensity employment space to locate in mixed-use formats along the City’s
commercial corridors, near transit nodes, and in areas well-served by the City’s multimodal
transportation network.
Policy ED-3.3: Regional Coordination. Coordinate local infrastructure investments and
initiatives with regional transportation improvements that enhance major corridors and
nodes.
Policy ED-4.3: Mixed-Use. Encourage the development and integration of a mix of uses
in a “main street” setting that includes retail anchored stores, entertainment, office, retail,
residential at various densities, and transit-oriented development and/or mix uses that
provide regional draw.
MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.1: Balanced Circulation System: Provide for a balanced circulation system
that promotes the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City.
Policy M-1.2: Access and Mobility: Strive to maintain sufficient access and mobility for
all modes of travel and users of the roadway network.
Findings
Page 153 of 266
Policy M-1.5: Transportation Improvements for All Users: Encourage roadway,
sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway
system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety.
Policy M-2.4: Public Transit: Promote public transportation programs that effectively
serve the City's residents and workers by connecting users to local and regional
destinations, including jobs, recreation, retail, and other activity centers.
Policy M-3.1: Complete Streets: Apply context-sensitive complete streets principles to
new roadways and to transportation improvements to serve all modes of travel and users
of all ages and abilities.
Policy M-3.2: Multimodal Facilities: Incorporate facilities and design features into
transportation improvement projects that support the use of public transit and active
transportation.
Policy M-3.3: Multimodal Connectivity: Link commercial development, employment
centers, public facilities, and community parks and open spaces to transit and active
transportation facilities and trails, wherever feasible.
Policy M-3.4: New Development: Encourage Specific Plans and Planned Developments
to include well-developed and funded multimodal transportation facilities.
Policy M-3.6: Park and Ride Facilities: Encourage the provision of regional public
transportation services and support facilities such as park and ride lots.
Policy M-4.1: Trails Master Plan: Implement applicable goals, policies, and projects
from the Trails Master Plan to provide trails and multimodal facilities that support active
transportation within and beyond the City.
Policy M-4.2: Active Transportation Network: Provide and maintain an extensive active
transportation and trail network that supports bicycles, pedestrians, and equestrians and is
linked to regional facilities and facilities of adjacent jurisdictions.
Policy M-4.3: Trail Development: Encourage the use of open space and utility easements
for bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian trails, where feasible.
Policy M-4.4: Trail Connectivity: Encourage Specific Plans and Planned Developments
to include well-developed and designed trails that connect neighborhoods to parks, schools,
jobs, and adjacent existing or planned local and/or regional trails.
Policy M-4.5: Support Facilities: Encourage new developments to provide bicycle
parking, lockers, and other support facilities for bicyclists.
Goal M-6: Transportation Management. Transportation management strategies that
comply with the County Congestion Management Plan and regional and statewide
greenhouse gas emissions targets.
Findings
Page 154 of 266
Policy M-6.1: Vehicle Miles Traveled: Maintain vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
thresholds and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) mitigation requirements for
the purpose of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA).
Policy M-6.2: Transportation Demand Management: Create and implement TDM and
congestion management mitigation measures in areas experiencing high levels of
congestion and VMT levels.
Policy M-6.4: New Development: Work with developers to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and minimize congestion related to new development through improvements to
the circulation system and on-site improvements that encourage non-vehicular modes of
transportation.
Action M-6c: Require developments that are approved based on TDM plans to incorporate
monitoring and enforcement of TDM targets as part of those plans.
3. Design Features
Threshold: Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact TR-3, pages 5.17-25 through 5.17-
27)
Explanation: The City of San Jacinto maintains improvement standards that guide the
construction of new transportation facilities to minimize design hazards for
all users of the system. The types of uses included as part of the General
Plan Update are generally similar to existing and surrounding uses and
thereby are compatible with the existing uses in the Study Area and in the
surrounding area. In addition, the Mobility Element developed as part of the
General Plan Update contains policies in support of roadway network safety
and reducing design hazards. This includes proposed Mobility Element
Policy M-1.6 and Action M-1d which promotes managing and improving
the City’s transportation network to be save, accessible and consistent with
the ADA and to include ADA accessible features as part of roadway
infrastructure projects. Proposed Mobility Element M-1.8 encourages
roadway design to include traffic calming measures to maintain safe
vehicular speeds. Proposed Land Use Element Policy LU-3.1 considers the
compatibility of new development with surrounding uses when reviewing
development proposals. Therefore, the impact of the Project with respect to
design and incompatible use hazards would be considered less than
significant.
Findings
Page 155 of 266
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and
enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes
efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse
gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures
compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this
Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).
Goal LU-3: Land Use Compatibility. A community that promotes high-quality
development and compatibility with surrounding land uses and major transportation
corridors.
Policy LU-3.1: Surrounding Uses. Consider as part of the development review process
the compatibility of new development with surrounding uses and the ability of new
development to enhance the character of the surrounding area.
Policy LU-3.2: Residential Uses. Require that new residential development be designed
to protect residents from potential conflicts with adjacent land uses, and other features
including rail corridors, and high-volume roadways.
Action LU-3b: Through the development review process, evaluate development proposals
for land use and transportation network compatibility with existing surrounding or abutting
development or neighborhoods.
MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.1: Balanced Circulation System. Provide for a balanced circulation system
that promotes the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City.
Policy M-1.5: Transportation Improvements for All Users: Encourage roadway,
sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway
system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety.
Policy M-1.6: ADA Accessibility: Manage and improve the City's transportation network
to be safe, accessible, and consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to
allow mobility-impaired users to safely travel within and beyond the City.
Policy M-1.7: Safe Routes to Schools: Work with the San Jacinto Unified School District
and Hemet Unified School District in the City to maintain Safe Routes to School and
encourage parents and children to walk or bike to schools.
Policy M-1.8: Traffic Calming: Encourage programming and design strategies to
maintain safe vehicular speeds on roadways, including traffic calming measures, where
applicable.
Findings
Page 156 of 266
Action M-1a: Periodically review and assess the vehicular operating conditions along City
facilities to determine what, if any, improvements are warranted to maintain a safe and
efficient flow of traffic in the City. Improvements may be identified and included in the
City’s Capital Improvement Plan and/or required as part of project approval through the
development review process.
Action M-1c: Consider roundabouts or other emerging design solutions when
improvement needs are identified.
Action M-1d: Include ADA-accessible facilities as part of roadway infrastructure projects.
Policy M-3.1: Complete Streets: Apply context-sensitive complete streets principles to
new roadways and to transportation improvements to serve all modes of travel and users
of all ages and abilities.
4. Emergency Access
Threshold: Would the project result in inadequate emergency access?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact 5.17-27, page 5.17-28)
Explanation: Implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would result in
increased development which would result in new roadways and would
increase the number of users on the City’s transportation system. There will
be a need to ensure that adequate emergency access provisions are made to
accommodate increased population and growth.
The General Plan Update is a programmatic level document; emergency
accessibility is typically assessed at the project level. At a programmatic
level, the General Plan Update does not include any downgrading of
facilities that would impede or obstruct emergency vehicle access along any
roadways that currently provide existing emergency vehicle access. As part
of the General Plan Update, the City prepared an analysis consistent with
SB 99 to identify residential developments in hazard areas that do not have
at least two emergency evacuation routes. The analysis found that out of
4,990 unique land parcels identified as residential and located within an
identified hazard zone, the vast majority (approximately 77 percent) of the
parcels have multiple exit points with access to multiple arterials, and
another 13 percent of the parcels have multiple exit points with access to a
single arterial, a loop road. Approximately 10 percent of the developed
parcels have one exit point with access directly onto a single arterial. Parcels
with one exit point with access directly onto a single arterial are widespread
throughout the Study Area, and tend to be condominium, apartment, and
mobile home communities, or large rural residential parcels. There are no
parcels in the Study Area described as having “one exit point with some
distance to a single arterial.” The General Plan Update includes policies and
actions to address emergency evacuation routes. Specifically, Policy PS-5.7
Findings
Page 157 of 266
directs the City to work with RCFD and RCSD to maintain, update, and
regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation routes to
assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.
The General Plan Update does not include any site-specific development.
Construction activities that may temporarily restrict vehicular traffic would
be required to implement appropriate measures to facilitate the passage of
persons and vehicles through/around any required road closures. The
General Plan Update identifies major arterials as the primary routes for
evacuation; however, evacuation routes would depend upon the emergency
event and area affected. Adequacy of emergency access associated with
future development projects would be analyzed and evaluated in detail
through the environmental review process. Future development would be
designed, constructed, and maintained in accordance with applicable
standards, including vehicular access to ensure that adequate emergency
access and evacuation would be maintained. Construction activities that
may temporarily restrict vehicular traffic would be required to implement
appropriate measures to facilitate the passage of persons and vehicles
through/around any required road closures. As part of the site plan and
design review process (SJDC Chapter 17.630), future development projects
would be reviewed for adequate access as well as consistency with adopted
emergency and evacuation plans among many other environmental issues
in order to ensure the safety of City residents and the physical environment.
In addition, the Public Safety and Mobility Elements developed as part of
the General Plan Update contains policies in support of emergency access
along local roads. The proposed Mobility Element Policy M-1.2 promotes
striving to maintain sufficient access and mobility for all modes of travel
and users of the roadway network. The proposed Public Safety Element
Policy PS-5.7 ensures the City works with the Riverside County Fire
Department (RCFD) and Riverside County Sheriff’s Department (RCSD)
to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols,
and evacuation routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of
emergency scenarios. Further, Policy PS-5.2 supports the development of
local preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and
communication agreements for emergency situations. Therefore, the impact
of the General Plan Update with respect to emergency access would be
considered less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.2: Access and Mobility: Strive to maintain sufficient access and mobility for
all modes of travel and users of the roadway network.
Policy M-2.1: Regional Agency Coordination: Coordinate with regional transportation
agencies, including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Riverside
Findings
Page 158 of 266
County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) to
implement roadway improvements that encourage the safe and efficient flow of traffic
within and beyond the City—for example, State Route 79 (SR-79) and Mid County
Parkway (Figure M-2).
Policy M-2.5: Freeway Coordination: Work with regional and State transportation
agencies to minimize the impacts of regional roadways construction (e.g., SR 79) on local
businesses and employment centers.
SAFETY ELEMENT
Policy PS-5.2: Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local
preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements
for emergency situations.
Policy PS-5.7: Emergency Evacuation Routes and Access. Work with RCFD and RCSD
to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation
routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.
Q. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
1. Tribal Cultural Resources
Threshold: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074
as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or
object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American tribe.
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impacts TCR-1 and TCR-2, pages 5.18-
11 through 5.18-14)
Explanation: One tribal cultural resource (P-33-017364) has been identified within the
Study Area. The City of San Jacinto is located within the traditional territory
of the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians. Information provided in the
Cultural Resources Study, including the records search and documented
Findings
Page 159 of 266
history of the area, as well as consultation with the Soboba Band of Luiseño
Indians, indicates the Study Area may contain tribal cultural resources.
Grading of original in situ soils could expose buried tribal cultural resources
and features including sacred sites. While the General Plan Update does not
directly propose site-specific development with the potential to directly
impact a tribal cultural resource, future development allowed under the
General Plan Update could cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource.
The General Plan Update Resource Management Element includes goals,
policies, and actions addressing tribal cultural resources. Policy RM-3.1
protects areas containing significant historic, archaeological, and
paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources
Code. Policy RM-3.4 requires consultation with Native American tribes that
may be impacted by proposed development, as necessary, and in accordance
with State, local, and tribal intergovernmental consultation requirements.
Action RM-3a directs the City to continue to assess development proposals
for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and
paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA. Action RM-3d establishes
that, in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any
location other than a dedicated cemetery, the City shall halt excavation or
disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie
adjacent human remains until the County Coroner has been informed and
has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the
remains are of Native American origin, there shall be no further excavation
or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie
adjacent human remains until the descendants from the deceased Native
Americans have made a recommendation to the landowner or the persons
responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of,
with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave
goods as provided in Public Resources Code section 5097.98, or the Native
American Heritage Commission was unable to identify a descendant or the
descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being
notified by the Commission. Action RM-3h requires, prior to adopting any
general plan, specific plan, or any amendment thereto, the City to notify
appropriate tribes of the opportunity for consultation for the purpose of
preserving, or mitigating impacts to, cultural places located on land within
the City’s jurisdiction that may be affected by the proposed plan or
amendment. Action RM-3i ensures that, prior to the adoption or substantial
amendment of a general plan or specific plan, the City shall refer the
proposed action to those tribes that are on the NAHC contact list and have
traditional lands located within the City’s jurisdiction for a 45 day comment
period. Action RM-3j requires that, prior to designating open space, the City
consult with tribes if the affected land contains a cultural place and if the
affected tribe has requested public notice under Government Code section
65092. Action RM-3j ensures that, prior to designating open space, the City
Findings
Page 160 of 266
shall consult with tribes if the affected land contains a cultural place and if
the affected tribe has requested public notice under Government Code
section 65092.
Potential impacts to tribal cultural resources associated with future
development would be reduced through implementation of General Plan
Update policies and actions. Subsequent development and infrastructure
projects would be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent
with the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to the City’s entitlement review
process. Subsequent projects implemented in accordance with the project
would be subject to the provisions of AB 52 and may require tribal
consultation with California Native American tribes that are traditionally
and culturally affiliated with the Planning Area. Future AB 52 consultation
may identify tribal cultural resources not yet found and formally recorded
that could be impacted by subsequent projects. Additionally, SJDC Chapter
17.500 is intended to protect cultural resources, including tribal cultural
resources. As conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permits and
Subdivision Maps, a developer would be required to enter into a Treatment
and Disposition Agreement (TDA) with the Soboba Band of Luiseño
Indians to address treatment and disposition of archaeological/cultural
resources and human remains associated with Soboba Band of Luiseño
Indians that may be uncovered or otherwise discovered during construction
of the project. The TDA may establish provisions for tribal monitors. If an
archeological/cultural assessment demonstrates the potential for
archeological/cultural resources to occur on the project site, tribal monitors,
including the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians may be allowed to monitor
all grading, excavation, ground-disturbing activities, including further
survey. Following the agreement of the developer, the designated
archeologist, tribal monitor, and any applicable responsible or trustee
agencies, grading, excavation, ground-disturbing activities would be
stopped temporarily and redirected in the event that any
archeological/cultural resources are discovered in order to evaluate the
significance of any archeological/cultural resource discovered on the
property. Compliance with the General Plan Update policies and actions
and existing regulations would not cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource and impacts would be less than
significant
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-3: Heritage Resources. A community that celebrates and preserves its rich
culture and historic assets.
Policy RM-3.1: Preservation. Protect areas containing significant historic,
archaeological, and paleontologic resources, as defined by the California Public Resources
Findings
Page 161 of 266
Code.
Policy RM-3.4: Tribal Consultation. Consult with Native American tribes that may be
impacted by proposed development, as necessary, and in accordance with state, local, and
tribal intergovernmental consultation requirements.
Action RM-3a: Continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to
sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Action RM-3c: For all development proposals within areas with the potential to contain
prehistoric/historic resources, the City shall require a study to be conducted by a
professional archaeologist. The objective of the study will be to determine if significant
archaeological resources are potentially present and if the project will significantly impact
these resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be
modified to avoid the impacts, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts.
Mitigation may involve archaeological investigation and resources recovery.
Action RM-3d: For projects that involve ground disturbing activities on native soil, prior
to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall enter a Treatment and Disposition
Agreement (TDA) with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to address treatment and
disposition of archaeological/cultural resources and human remains associated with
Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians that may be uncovered or otherwise discovered during
construction of the project. The TDA may establish provisions for tribal monitors.
Following execution of the TDA by the developer and Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians,
the TDA will be incorporated by reference into the grading permit.
Action RM-3g: In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any
location other than a dedicated cemetery, the City shall halt excavation or disturbance of
the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until
the County Coroner has been informed and has determined that no investigation of the
cause of death is required. If the remains are of Native American origin, there shall be no
further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to
overlie adjacent human remains until the descendants from the deceased Native Americans
have made a recommendation to the landowner or the persons responsible for the
excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human
remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code section
5097.98, or the Native American Heritage Commission was unable to identify a descendant
or the descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being granted
access to the site.
Action RM-3h: Prior to adopting any general plan, specific plan, or any amendment
thereto, the City shall notify appropriate tribes of the opportunity for consultation for the
purpose of preserving, or mitigating impacts to, cultural places located on land within the
City’s jurisdiction that may be affected by the proposed plan or amendment.
Action RM-3i: Prior to the adoption or substantial amendment of a general plan or specific
Findings
Page 162 of 266
plan, the City shall refer the proposed action to those tribes that are on the NAHC contact
list and have traditional lands located within the City’s jurisdiction for a 45 day comment
period.
Action RM-3j: Prior to designating open space, the City shall consult with tribes if the
affected land contains a cultural place and if the affected tribe has requested public notice
under Government Code section 65092.
R. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
1. Utilities and Service Systems
Threshold: Would the Project require or result in the relocation or construction of new
or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric
power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact USS-1, pages 5.19-35 through
5.19-42)
Explanation: Water
In regard to water facilities, the General Plan Update is expected to result
in population and employment growth within the Study Area, and thus, an
overall increase in demand on water supply, which would necessitate
construction of future water supply infrastructure. Buildout under the
General Plan Update could yield a net change over existing conditions of
an additional 16,252 housing units, an additional population of 54,280
people, an additional 21,839,634 square feet of non-residential building
square footage, and an additional 19,674 jobs within the Study Area. This
increased demand for water infrastructure would primarily be located
within areas that are already developed and serviced by the City of San
Jacinto Water Department and EMWD. Since no specific development
projects are proposed as part of the General Plan Update, the environmental
effects from constructing or expanding facilities are unknown at this time.
All water infrastructure construction activities associated with future
development would be subject to compliance with existing local, State, and
federal laws, ordinances, and regulations, which would ensure impacts are
reduced to less than significant levels. The City would continue to
coordinate with EMWD to ensure adequate water distribution facilities are
available to serve future development. Furthermore, these future water
facilities would be subject to General Plan Update policies and actions
intended to protect the environment. Policy RM-2.1 directs the City to
cooperate with federal, State, and county governments, and other agencies
on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and quantity of local
and regional groundwater resources. Policy RM-2.2 protect aquifers within
the Basin and encourages groundwater recharge. Policy RM-2.3 promotes
Findings
Page 163 of 266
residential, commercial, and institutional water conservation strategies
using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best practices.
Action RM-2e requires, through the development review process, that
sufficient water supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to
serve the development prior to approval of the project, pursuant to Water
Code Section 10910 and Government Code Section 66473.7. Policy RM-
9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration
with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify
infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for
public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Action RM-9a directs the City
to continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water
supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the
community. This would specifically involve, during the processing of
development proposals, consultation with the water districts regarding the
potential impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment
facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, it would also
require proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part
of the application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures
during construction and development. Action RM-9b directs cooperation
with the water districts to update population projections, water use and
sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the
Water and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years. Action RM-9e
directs cooperation with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively
manage groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment
and other applicable federal, State and local regulations. The
implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update policies
and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water facilities to a level that is less than
significant.
Wastewater
In regard to wastewater, the General Plan Update is expected to result in
increased population and employment growth within the Study Area, and
thus, an overall increase in demand on the existing sewer system associated
with increased sewage flows. Buildout under the General Plan Update
would accommodate a population of 107,152. Therefore, using the
wastewater generation rate of 43 gpcd, as calculated in the 2018 Sewer
Master Plan, the City’s total wastewater flow for 2040 under the General
Plan Update would be 4.6 MGD. This is approximately 0.6 MGD less than
the 5.2 MGD projected 2040 wastewater flow in the 2018 Sewer Master
Plan Update. Therefore, the sewer system under the 2018 Sewer Master
Plan accommodates the projected population growth of implementation of
the General Plan Update. The ultimate capacity of the San Jacinto Valley
RWRF, where San Jacinto sewer water is treated and/or disposed of, would
Findings
Page 164 of 266
be able to meet the project wastewater production from the City of San
Jacinto. The General Plan Update does not include specific development
proposals; therefore, the environmental effects of future wastewater
collection systems are unknown at this time. Future developments would be
reviewed by the City, during site plan review in order to determine if
sufficient local and trunk sewer capacity exists to serve the specific
development, in accordance with SJDC Chapter 17.630, Site Plan and
Design Review. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes policies,
and actions to ensure adequate wastewater services and facilities and that
potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of new
or expanded infrastructure would be reduced. Policy RM-9.1 maintains and
implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate
outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with
appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities
and services in San Jacinto. Action RM-9a directs the City to continue to
cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water supply and
sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.
This would specifically involve, during the processing of development
proposals, consultation with the water districts regarding the potential
impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment facilities.
When requested by the district or City Engineer, it would also require
proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the
application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during
construction and development. Action RM-9b directs cooperation with the
water districts to update population projections, water use and sewer
generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water
and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years. Action RM-9c directs the
City to work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and
expansion of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary.
The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update
policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or
construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities to a level that is less
than significant.
Stormwater
Development under the proposed General Plan Update would result in
increased areas of impervious surfaces throughout the Study Area, resulting
in the need for additional or expanded stormwater drainage, conveyance and
retention infrastructure. As described above, RCFCWCD provides flood
control services within the Study Area, and is responsible for the regional
drainage facilities, while the City controls the local facilities. The
infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve new growth would involve
development of some facilities on-site within new development projects,
some facilities off-site on appropriately designated land, and may also
Findings
Page 165 of 266
involve improvements to existing facilities and disturbance of existing
rights-of-way. The specific impacts of providing new and expanded
drainage facilities cannot be determined at this time, as the General Plan
Update does not propose or approve any specific development project nor
does it designate specific sites for new or expanded public facilities.
Stormwater drainage and conveyance facilities would be evaluated at the
project-level in association with subsequent development projects.
However, the facilities would be primarily provided on sites with land use
designations that allow such uses and the environmental impacts of
constructing and operating the facilities would likely be similar to those
associated with new development, redevelopment, and infrastructure
projects under the General Plan. As future development and infrastructure
projects are considered by the City, each project will be evaluated for
conformance with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and other applicable
regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also
be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the
requirements of CEQA. As such, this is a less than significant impact and
no additional mitigation is required.
The General Plan Update policies and actions would further ensure that
there is adequate stormwater drainage and flood control infrastructure to
serve future development under the General Plan Update, and would ensure
that future drainage and flood control infrastructure projects do not result in
adverse environmental impacts. Policy RM-2.5 directs the City to work
cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively and efficiently
manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water
conservation strategy. Action RM-2a requires new development and
redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff through
implementation of BMPs. It also requires existing development to control
stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that
would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Policy RM-9.1
maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with
appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance
with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify
infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for
public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Action RM-9f ensures the City
refers to the Master Drainage Plan during the annual budget and capital
improvement program process to identify the resources needed to designate,
preserve, and acquire land for necessary flood control and drainage
facilities. The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan
Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the
relocation or construction of new or expanded stormwater facilities to a
level that is less than significant.
Findings
Page 166 of 266
Electrical, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications
In regard to electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication services, the
Study Area is within the service areas of SJP and SCE, SoCalGas, and
various telecommunication providers. New growth anticipated by the
General Plan Update would require increased electrical, natural gas, and
telecommunications services, potentially resulting in the new construction
or relocation of facilities. The environmental effects of future expansions of
electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication facilities would be evaluated
with each development proposal and would require a separate
environmental review related to the construction and operation of new
electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure. Future
implementing projects under the General Plan Update would have to
coordinate with each utility provider to establish service, provide any
necessary extensions of facilities, and comply with regulations in existence
at that time. As future development and infrastructure projects are
considered by the City, each project will be evaluated for conformance with
the General Plan, Municipal Code, and other applicable regulations.
Furthermore, these future facilities would be subject to General Plan Update
goals and policies intended to protect the environment. Policy RM-5.4
promotes the use of energy-efficient materials, equipment, and design in
public and private facilities and infrastructure. Policy RM-5.5 promotes
energy conservation and recycling by the public and private sectors. Policy
RM-5.6 directs the City to collaborate with local service providers in
determining and meeting the needs of the community for energy in clean,
modern, and cost-effective ways. Policy RM-9.1 maintains and implements
public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside
service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate
regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure needs,
funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and
services in San Jacinto. The implementation of existing regulations and
General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated
with the relocation or construction of new or expanded electrical, natural
gas, and telecommunications facilities to a level that is less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City
requirements.
Action LU-2a: Cooperate with LAFCo and the County of Riverside to direct growth
outside the City limits on lands that are served, or planned to be served, with a full range
of urban services, such as public water and sewer, an extensive road network, public transit,
Findings
Page 167 of 266
safety and emergency response services, parks, trails, and open space.
Policy LU-3.8: Public Utilities. Ensure land uses and development are compatible with
existing and proposed utility facilities including the San Jacinto Wastewater Treatment
Facility.
Action LU-3a: Ensure all projects are reviewed and processed per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water
resources.
Policy RM-2.1: Regional Cooperation. Cooperate with federal, State, and county
governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and
quantity of local and regional groundwater resources.
Policy RM-2.2: Groundwater Management. Protect aquifers within the Basin and
encourage groundwater recharge.
Policy RM-2.3: Conservation. Promote residential, commercial, and institutional water
conservation strategies using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best
practices.
Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to
watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining
these resources in their natural condition if feasible.
Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively
and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water
conservation strategy.
Policy RM-2.6: Septic Systems. Discourage the use of septic systems to reduce potential
negative impacts to groundwater.
Policy RM-2.7: Reclaimed Water. Promote the expanded use of reclaimed water, where
feasible.
Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new
development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through
implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of
water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing
development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific
development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with
relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game
Findings
Page 168 of 266
(CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Co ntrol Board
(RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8-
2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).
Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a
plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.
Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the
planning area as well as downstream.
Action RM-2c: In cooperation with the state, regional, and local water agencies and
suppliers, participate in programs that seek to expand the availability and use of recycled
water for irrigation where feasible and legally permitted. Specifically, support the
expansion of the use of recycled water for urban and agricultural irrigation. Cooperate with
these agencies to establish standards and regulations for the use of recycled water in
development projects.
Action RM-2d: Work with the water districts and private developers to encourage water
conservation in the following ways:
Implementing aquifer and groundwater recharge programs
Participating in water conservation programs operated by the local and regional
water districts
Establishing water conservation education programs
Requiring the use of drought resistant plant species in landscaping for public and
private areas, including parks and recreational facilities, in accordance with the
Water Efficient Landscaping requirements.
Expanding the production and use of reclaimed water
Requiring the incorporation of water conservation devices, including low flush
toilets, flow restriction devices, and water conserving appliances in both new public
and private development projects and rehabilitation projects.
Action RM-2e: Through the development review process, require that sufficient water
supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to
approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and Government Code
Section 66473.7.
Action RM-2f: Whenever feasible, incorporate improved open space and preservation
areas and quasi-active recreation facilities in areas used for ground water recharge and/or
drainage detention.
Action RM-2g: During the development review process, the City shall allow new septic
Findings
Page 169 of 266
systems only for low density projects if they have met the RWQCB’s minimum lot size
requirement of one-half acre per subsurface disposal system and where sewer connection
is infeasible.
Action RM-2h: Continue to encourage the conversion from existing septic systems to
sewer by limiting the replacement or expansion/repair of existing septic systems as
feasible.
Policy RM-5.4: Energy-Efficient Materials. Promote the use of energy-efficient
materials, equipment, and design in public and private facilities and infrastructure.
Policy RM-5.5: Energy Conservation. Promote energy conservation and recycling by the
public and private sectors.
Policy RM-5.6: Energy Needs. Collaborate with local service providers in determining
and meeting the needs of the community for energy in clean, modern, and cost-effective
ways.
Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the
timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.
Policy RM-9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its
fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational
amenities, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas
targeted for near-term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities
through the orderly extension of infrastructure.
Policy RM-9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new
development.
Policy RM-9.6: Telecommunications. Encourage service providers to make available the
highest level of telecommunications infrastructure, along with a wide range of modern
telecommunications services for San Jacinto’s residences, businesses, and institutions.
Action RM-9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water
supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.
Specifically, the City should:
Findings
Page 170 of 266
During the processing of development proposals, ensure the water districts are
consulted regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and
sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, require
proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the
application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during
construction and development.
Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any
new development.
Require water conservation devices and xeriscape water efficient landscaping in
new public and private development and redevelopment projects.
Action RM-9b: Cooperate with the water districts to update population projections, water
use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water
and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years.
Action RM-9c: Work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and expansion
of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary.
Action RM-9d: Whenever feasible, require the installation and use of reclaimed water
systems for irrigation purposes in new developments.
Action RM-9e: Cooperate with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage
groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable
federal, State and local regulations.
Action RM-9f: During the annual budget and CIP process, refer to the Master Drainage
Plan to identify the resources needed to designate, preserve, and acquire land for necessary
flood control and drainage facilities.
2. Water Supplies
Threshold: Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry
and multiple dry years?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact USS-2, pages 3.19-42 through
5.19-47)
Explanation: The General Plan Update is expected to result in increased population and
employment growth within the Study Area, and a corresponding increase in
the demand for additional water supplies. Buildout under the General Plan
could yield a total of 32,081 housing units, a population of 107,152 people,
24,413,227 square feet of non-residential building square footage, and
26,989 jobs within the Study Area. This represents development growth
over existing conditions of up to 16,252 new housing units, 54,280 people,
Findings
Page 171 of 266
21,839,634 square feet of new non-residential building square footage, and
19,674 new jobs. Water service is provided in the vast majority of the Study
Area by City of San Jacinto Water Department and EMWD, while
LHMWD provides water services to only a small portion of the City. All
three service providers have concluded in their respective UWMPs that they
would be able to meet projected future water demands under normal, dry,
and multiple dry water years. For future qualifying projects, a Water Supply
Assessment would be required pursuant to SB 610 for inclusion in the
project’s CEQA analysis. The Water Supply Assessment discerns whether
the expected demand from the development being proposed has been
accounted for in the forecasted demands in the most recent UWMP. A
Written Verification of Supply per SB 221 is prepared as a condition of
approval for a subdivision map of 500 units or more. Considered a fail-safe
mechanism to provide sufficient evidence that adequate water supplies are
available before construction begins, the Written Verification of Supply is
also prepared/adopted by the water supplier and approved by the land use
authority. Depending on the project, one or both of these analyses may be
required. Development proposals that may not warrant a Water Supply
Assessment and/or Written Verification of Supply, but meet the definition
of a project under CEQA, would still require an analysis of sufficient water
supplies in the CEQA process. Additionally, the General Plan Update
includes goals, policies, and actions to ensure that adequate water supply,
treatment, and distribution capacity is available to meet the needs of the
proposed development without negatively impacting the existing
community. Policy RM-2.1 directs the City to cooperate with federal, State,
and county governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and
improvement of the quality and quantity of local and regional groundwater
resources. Policy RM-2.2 protect aquifers within the Basin and encourages
groundwater recharge. Policy RM-2.3 promotes residential, commercial,
and institutional water conservation strategies using multiple innovative
strategies and contemporary best practices. Action RM-2e requires, through
the development review process, that sufficient water supply and water
infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to
approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and
Government Code Section 66473.7. Policy RM-9.1 maintains and
implements public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate
outside service providers and agencies, to ensure compliance with
appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities
and services in San Jacinto. Action RM-9a directs the City to continue to
cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water suppl y and
sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.
This would specifically involve, during the processing of development
proposals, consultation with the water districts regarding the potential
impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment facilities.
When requested by the district or City Engineer, it would also require
Findings
Page 172 of 266
proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the
application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during
construction and development. Action RM-9b directs cooperation with the
water districts to update population projections, water use and sewer
generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water
and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years. Action RM-9c directs the
City to work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and
expansion of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary.
Action RM-9d requires, whenever feasible, the installation and use of
reclaimed water systems for irrigation purposes in new developments.
Action RM-9e directs cooperation with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster
to proactively manage groundwater resources and comply with the
Stipulated Judgment and other applicable federal, State and local
regulations. Through implementation of existing federal, State, and local
regulations and the General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions, the
environmental impacts to water supplies would be less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City
requirements.
Action LU-2a: Cooperate with LAFCo and the County of Riverside to direct growth
outside the City limits on lands that are served, or planned to be served, with a full range
of urban services, such as public water and sewer, an extensive road network, public transit,
safety and emergency response services, parks, trails, and open space.
Policy LU-3.8: Public Utilities. Ensure land uses and development are compatible with
existing and proposed utility facilities including the San Jacinto Wastewater Treatment
Facility.
Action LU-3a: Ensure all projects are reviewed and processed per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water
resources.
Policy RM-2.1: Regional Cooperation. Cooperate with federal, State, and county
governments, and other agencies on the maintenance and improvement of the quality and
quantity of local and regional groundwater resources.
Findings
Page 173 of 266
Policy RM-2.2: Groundwater Management. Protect aquifers within the Basin and
encourage groundwater recharge.
Policy RM-2.3: Conservation. Promote residential, commercial, and institutional water
conservation strategies using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best
practices.
Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to
watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retainin g
these resources in their natural condition if feasible.
Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively
and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water
conservation strategy.
Policy RM-2.6: Septic Systems. Discourage the use of septic systems to reduce potential
negative impacts to groundwater.
Policy RM-2.7: Reclaimed Water. Promote the expanded use of reclaimed water, where
feasible.
Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new
development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through
implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of
water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing
development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific
development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with
relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8-
2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).
Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a
plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.
Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the
planning area as well as downstream.
Action RM-2c: In cooperation with the state, regional, and local water agencies and
suppliers, participate in programs that seek to expand the availability and use of recycled
water for irrigation where feasible and legally permitted. Specifically, support the
expansion of the use of recycled water for urban and agricultural irrigation. Cooperate with
these agencies to establish standards and regulations for the use of recycled water in
development projects.
Findings
Page 174 of 266
Action RM-2d: Work with the water districts and private developers to encourage water
conservation in the following ways:
Implementing aquifer and groundwater recharge programs
Participating in water conservation programs operated by the local and regional
water districts
Establishing water conservation education programs
Requiring the use of drought resistant plant species in landscaping for public and
private areas, including parks and recreational facilities, in accordance with the
Water Efficient Landscaping requirements.
Expanding the production and use of reclaimed water
Requiring the incorporation of water conservation devices, including low flush
toilets, flow restriction devices, and water conserving appliances in both new public
and private development projects and rehabilitation projects.
Action RM-2e: Through the development review process, require that sufficient water
supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to
approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and Government Code
Section 66473.7.
Action RM-2f: Whenever feasible, incorporate improved open space and preservation
areas and quasi-active recreation facilities in areas used for ground water recharge and/or
drainage detention.
Action RM-2g: During the development review process, the City shall allow new septic
systems only for low density projects if they have met the RWQCB’s minimum lot size
requirement of one-half acre per subsurface disposal system and where sewer connection
is infeasible.
Action RM-2h: Continue to encourage the conversion from existing septic systems to
sewer by limiting the replacement or expansion/repair of existing septic systems as
feasible.
Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the
timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.
Findings
Page 175 of 266
Policy RM-9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its
fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational
amenities, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas
targeted for near-term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities
through the orderly extension of infrastructure.
Policy RM-9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new
development.
Action RM-9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water
supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.
Specifically, the City should:
During the processing of development proposals, ensure the water districts are
consulted regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and
sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, require
proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the
application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during
construction and development.
Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any
new development.
Require water conservation devices and xeriscape water efficient landscaping in
new public and private development and redevelopment projects.
Action RM-9b: Cooperate with the water districts to update population projections, water
use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water
and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years.
Action RM-9c: Work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and expansion
of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary.
Action RM-9d: Whenever feasible, require the installation and use of reclaimed water
systems for irrigation purposes in new developments.
Action RM-9e: Cooperate with the Hemet-San Jacinto Watermaster to proactively manage
groundwater resources and comply with the Stipulated Judgment and other applicable
federal, State and local regulations.
3. Wastewater Capacity
Threshold: Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity
Findings
Page 176 of 266
to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact USS-3, pages 5.19-47 through
5.19-49)
Explanation: The total amount of projected wastewater flow to EMWD’s San Jacinto
Valley RWRF, where San Jacinto sewer water is treated and/or disposed of,
for the year 2040 would be approximately 16.4 MGD. The current capacity
for the San Jacinto Valley RWRF is 14 MGD and the maximum capacity
for the treatment facility is 27 MGD. Therefore, the ultimate capacity of the
facility would be able to meet the projected wastewater production from the
City of San Jacinto. As noted above, the General Plan Update enables
additional development but does not include specific development
proposals. At the time future projects are proposed, they would require a
separate environmental review and compliance with regulations in
existence at that time to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity
exists. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and
actions to ensure adequate wastewater facilities capacity to serve the
Project’s projected demand. Policy LU-2.1 ensures that new development
corresponds to the provision of infrastructure, public services, and
community facilities and that new development funds and constructs its fair
share of improvements in accordance with City requirements. Policy RM-
9.1 maintains and implements public facility master plans, in collaboration
with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify
infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for
public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Action RM-9a directs the City
to continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water
supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the
community. This would specifically involve, during the processing of
development proposals, consultation with the water districts regarding the
potential impact of the project on water supplies and sewage treatment
facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, it would also
require proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part
of the application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures
during construction and development. Action RM-9b directs cooperation
with the water districts to update population projections, water use and
sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the
Water and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years. Action RM-9c
directs the City to work with the water districts to expedite the improvement
and expansion of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when
necessary. The implementation of existing federal, State, and local
regulations and the General Plan Update policies and actions would ensure
adequate wastewater treatment capacity and impacts would be less than
significant.
Findings
Page 177 of 266
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-2.1: Plan for New Development. Ensure that new development corresponds to
the provision of infrastructure, public services, and community facilities and that new
development funds and constructs its fair share of improvements in accordance with City
requirements.
Action LU-2a: Cooperate with LAFCo and the County of Riverside to direct growth
outside the City limits on lands that are served, or planned to be served, with a full range
of urban services, such as public water and sewer, an extensive road network, public transit,
safety and emergency response services, parks, trails, and open space.
Policy LU-3.8: Public Utilities. Ensure land uses and development are compatible with
existing and proposed utility facilities including the San Jacinto Wastewater Treatment
Facility.
Action LU-3a: Ensure all projects are reviewed and processed per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the
timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.
Policy RM-9.3: Fair Share. Ensure that all new development provides for and funds its
fair share of the costs for the expansion of public infrastructure and services, recreational
amenities, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.4: Prioritization. Prioritize the placement of new infrastructure in areas
targeted for near-term development and in areas designated as disadvantaged communities
through the orderly extension of infrastructure.
Policy RM-9.5: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan for new
development.
Action RM-9a: Continue to cooperate with the water districts to ensure adequate water
supply and sewage treatment facilities are provided and maintained in the community.
Specifically, the City should:
Findings
Page 178 of 266
During the processing of development proposals, ensure the water districts are
consulted regarding the potential impact of the project on water supplies and
sewage treatment facilities. When requested by the district or City Engineer, require
proposed developments to include a water quality assessment as part of the
application materials, and implement identified mitigation measures during
construction and development.
Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any
new development.
Require water conservation devices and xeriscape water efficient landscaping in
new public and private development and redevelopment projects.
Action RM-9b: Cooperate with the water districts to update population projections, water
use and sewer generation formulas, needed improvements, and programs within the Water
and Sewer Master Plans at least every five years.
Action RM-9c: Work with the water districts to expedite the improvement and expansion
of water, reclaimed water, and sewer facilities, when necessary.
4. Solid Waste Generation
Threshold: Would the Project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards,
or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact USS-4, page 5.19-49 through
5.19-52)
Explanation: Future development of projects as contemplated under the General Plan
Update may increase the population within the Study Area by an additional
54,280 people. The City of San Jacinto has achieved a disposal rate of 3.8
PPD per resident in 2019. Assuming these disposal rates remain constant
throughout the life of the General Plan Update, the new growth under
General Plan buildout would result in a net increase of approximately
206,264 PPD of solid waste over existing conditions, which equals 103.1
net TPD or 37,631.5 net tons of solid waste per year. The vast majority (95
percent) of solid waste disposed from the City of San Jacinto in 2019 went
to two waste disposal facilities: Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill (69
percent) and El Sobrante Landfill (26 percent). The City’s projected
increase in solid waste generation associated with 2040 buildout under the
General Plan Update is within the permitted capacity of both the Lamb
Canyon Sanitary Landfill and El Sobrante Landfill. Further, it is more likely
that future solid waste would be distributed to the other landfills serving the
City.
All future development would be required to comply with the mandatory
Findings
Page 179 of 266
commercial and multifamily recycling requirements of AB 341, thus
reducing the amount of landfill waste. Furthermore, the General Plan
Update goals, policies, and actions that would reduce the demand for solid
waste disposal. Policy RM-10.1 ensures compliance with local, regional and
State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling,
and composting. Policy RM-10.2 provides adequate waste disposal,
recycling, and refuse services for present and future residents and
businesses, including programs that improve public access to solid waste
collection and recycling facilities. Policy RM-10.4 ensures participation in
source reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid
waste sent to landfills and ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region.
Policy RM-10.5 directs the City to work with appropriate service providers
to collect and compost greenwaste, including landscaping, Christmas trees,
composting and mulch, and other sources of organic waste, to distribute for
use in parks, medians, and other municipal areas. Policy RM-10.7 promotes
citywide educational programs to inform citizens of the benefits of
recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations. Action RM-10a
ensures solid waste collection activities completed by franchise solid waste
haulers, facility siting and construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities,
operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household
hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the
County Solid Waste Management Plan. Action RM-10b includes standard
language in requests for services and in City agreements requiring
contractors to use best management practices to maximize diversion of
waste from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates.
Action RM-10c encourages the expansion of recycling, reuse, and
appropriate disposal of hazardous materials, including: increased
participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside recycling
programs; increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling
programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics; and reduced yard and
landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling,
and using resource efficient landscaping techniques. Through the
implementation of existing regulations and the General Plan Update
policies and actions, this is a less than significant impact.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-10.1: Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with local, regional and
State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting.
Policy RM-10.2: Solid Waste Collection. Provide adequate waste disposal, recycling, and
refuse services for present and future residents and businesses, including programs that
improve public access to solid waste collection and recycling facilities.
Findings
Page 180 of 266
Policy RM-10.4: Source Reduction and Recycling Efforts. Participate in source
reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and
ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region
Policy RM-10.5: Organic Waste. Work with appropriate service providers to collect and
compost greenwaste, including landscaping, Christmas trees, composting and mulch, and
other sources of organic waste, to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal
areas.
Policy RM-10.6: Fees and Funding. Work with appropriate service providers to
periodically review collection, recycling, and disposal fees to achieve state and federal
mandates, meet community expectations, and reflect cost efficiencies or increases for
service delivery.
Policy RM-10.7: Public Education. Promote citywide educational programs to inform
citizens of the benefits of recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations.
Action RM-10a: On an ongoing basis and in compliance with State law, ensure solid waste
collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and
construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and
recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are
consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan.
Action RM-10b: Include standard language in requests for services and in City agreements
requiring contractors to use best management practices to maximize diversion of waste
from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates.
Action RM-10c: Encourage the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of
hazardous materials, including the following:
Increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside
recycling programs;
Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper,
cardboard, and plastics;
Reduce yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass
recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques; and
Encourage local businesses to provide electronic waste (e-waste) drop-off services
and encourage residents and businesses to properly dispose of, or recycle, e-waste.
5. Solid Waste Regulations
Threshold: Would the Project comply with federal, state, and local management and
reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Findings
Page 181 of 266
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact USS-5, pages 5.19-52 through
5.19-54)
Explanation: Chapter 8.32 of the Municipal Code establishes mandatory solid waste and
recycling collection to comply with the requirements of AB 939 and AB
341. The City has also established disposal and mandatory recycling
requirements for commercial facilities, single family residential and
multifamily residential premises to comply with State law diversion
requirements. As permitted by AB 939, the City authorizes a private solid
waste franchisee (i.e., CR&R) to handle the City’s solid waste and requires
CR&R to cooperate in the preparation of solid waste disposal
characterization studies and the preparation of waste stream audits. CR&R
and the City work together to submit information to meet the reporting
requirements of AB 939, or any other law or regulation, to reach the solid
waste and recycling goals mandated by the AB 939.
The General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions would reduce the
demand for solid waste disposal. Policy RM-10.1 ensures compliance with
local, regional and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source
reduction, recycling, and composting. Policy RM -10.2 provides adequate
waste disposal, recycling, and refuse services for present and future
residents and businesses, including programs that improve public access to
solid waste collection and recycling facilities. Policy RM-10.4 ensures
participation in source reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the
amount of solid waste sent to landfills and ensure adequate landfill capacity
in the region. Policy RM-10.5 directs the City to work with appropriate
service providers to collect and compost greenwaste, including landscaping,
Christmas trees, composting and mulch, and other sources of organic waste,
to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal areas. Policy
RM-10.7 promotes citywide educational programs to inform citizens of the
benefits of recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations.
Action RM-10a ensures solid waste collection activities completed by
franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and construction of transfer
and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and recycling
programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs
are consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan. Action RM-
10b includes standard language in requests for services and in City
agreements requiring contractors to use best management practices to
maximize diversion of waste from the landfill in order to meet the City’s
specified diversion rates. Action RM-10c encourages the expansion of
recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials, including:
increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside
recycling programs; increased participation in commercial and industrial
recycling programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics; and reduced yard and
landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling,
and using resource efficient landscaping techniques. Through the
Findings
Page 182 of 266
implementation of existing regulations and the General Plan Update
policies and actions, future development implemented by the General Plan
Update would continue to comply with management and reduction statutes
and regulations related to solid waste and impacts would be less than
significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-10.1: Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with local, regional and
State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting.
Policy RM-10.2: Solid Waste Collection. Provide adequate waste disposal, recycling, and
refuse services for present and future residents and businesses, including programs that
improve public access to solid waste collection and recycling facilities.
Policy RM-10.4: Source Reduction and Recycling Efforts. Participate in source
reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and
ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region
Policy RM-10.5: Organic Waste. Work with appropriate service providers to collect and
compost greenwaste, including landscaping, Christmas trees, composting and mulch, and
other sources of organic waste, to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal
areas.
Policy RM-10.6: Fees and Funding. Work with appropriate service providers to
periodically review collection, recycling, and disposal fees to achieve state and federal
mandates, meet community expectations, and reflect cost efficiencies or increases for
service delivery.
Policy RM-10.7: Public Education. Promote citywide educational programs to inform
citizens of the benefits of recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations.
Action RM-10a: On an ongoing basis and in compliance with State law, ensure solid waste
collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and
construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and
recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are
consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan.
Action RM-10b: Include standard language in requests for services and in City agreements
requiring contractors to use best management practices to maximize diversion of waste
from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates.
Action RM-10c: Encourage the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of
hazardous materials, including the following:
Increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside
Findings
Page 183 of 266
recycling programs;
Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper,
cardboard, and plastics;
Reduce yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass
recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques; and
Encourage local businesses to provide electronic waste (e-waste) drop-off services
and encourage residents and businesses to properly dispose of, or recycle, e-waste.
S. WILDFIRE
1. Response Plans
Threshold: If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high
fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact WR-1, pages 5.20-10 through
5.20-14)
Explanation: The Study Area contains both SRAs and LRAs that are classified as
VHFHSZs (with SRAs also containing moderate to high FHSZs). The
General Plan Update would allow a variety of new development, including
residential, commercial, industrial, and public service uses, which would
result in increased jobs and population in the Study Area. Implementation
of the General Plan Update would not impair or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. the
Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) provides fire and emergency
response service to the City of San Jacinto. The RCFD Strategic Plan 2009-
2029 outlines goals and strategies for fire protection services throughout the
Riverside County Operational Area, including facility needs and
improvements, training requirements, and disaster preparedness. The City’s
EOP addresses the planned response to extraordinary situations associated
with natural disasters and/or human caused incidents, including wildfires.
The EOP focuses on coordinating mutual aid and provides an overview of
the operational concepts relating to various emergency situations, identifies
components of the emergency response, and describes the overall
responsibilities of the Riverside County Operational Area for supporting
Operational Area Members in protecting life and property. The EOP does
not provide a specific evacuation route map, as evacuation measures would
be implemented based on the specific emergency and area affected. The
General Plan Update would not require or result in revisions to the RCFD
Strategic Plan or adopted EOP.
The General Plan Update does not include any site-specific development.
Findings
Page 184 of 266
However, future development would be designed, constructed, and
maintained in accordance with applicable standards, including vehicular
access to ensure that adequate emergency access and evacuation would be
maintained. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 8.16, Fire Code,
construction activities that may temporarily restrict fire apparatus access
would be required to implement appropriate measures to facilitate the
passage of fire apparatus and emergency vehicles through/around any
effected roadways, as part of the building permit process. The General Plan
Update identifies major arterials as the primary routes for evacuation;
however, evacuation routes would depend upon the emergency event and
area affected.
As part of the General Plan Update, the City prepared an analysis consistent
with Senate Bill 99 to identify residential developments in hazard areas that
do not have at least two emergency evacuation routes. The analysis found
that out of 4,990 unique land parcels identified as residential and located
within an identified hazard zone, the vast majority (approximately 77
percent) of the parcels have multiple exit points with access to multiple
arterials, and another 13 percent of the parcels have multiple exit points with
access to a single arterial, a loop road. Approximately 10 percent of the
developed parcels have one exit point with access directly onto a single
arterial. Parcels with one exit point with access directly onto a single arterial
are widespread throughout the Study Area, and tend to be condominium,
apartment, and mobile home communities, or large rural residential parcels.
There are no parcels in the Study Area described as having “one exit point
with some distance to a single arterial.”
The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address
emergency evacuation routes. Specifically, Policy PS-5.7 directs the City to
work with RCFD and RCSD to maintain, update, and regularly exercise
emergency access, protocols, and evacuation routes to assess their
effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios. Action PS-2a
implements the EOP to ensure the most effective allocation of resources for
protection of people and property in time of an emergency, and update it as
needed. Policy PS-5.1 ensures the provision of sufficient levels of all
emergency response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all
persons and to protect property in the City. In addition, Policy PS-5.2
supports the development of local preparedness plans and multi-
jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements for emergency
situations. Action RM-6c implements an Emergency Operation Center to
respond to and manage disasters in cooperation with the school districts,
police and fire departments, and local, state, and federal emergency
management agencies. It would also provide annual training for City staff
in emergency management so that when they are called into action, they
will be able to distribute information and resources to the public effectively.
Findings
Page 185 of 266
Primary access to all major roads would be maintained during construction
of future developments within the Study Area. As part of the site plan and
design review process (SJDC Chapter 17.630), future development projects
would be reviewed for adequate infrastructure and access as well as
consistency with adopted emergency and evacuation plans among many
other environmental issues in order to ensure the safety of City residents
and the physical environment. Therefore, the General Plan Update would
not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan and impacts would be less than significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-2: Fire Safety: A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire
emergencies.
Policy PS-2.2: Fire Protection Services. Reduce the risk of fire to the community by
coordinating emergency preparedness with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD).
Policy PS-2.3: Fire Hazard Identification. Work with RCFD to maintain and regularly
update the City’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map (Figure PS-2) for changes in fire hazard
severity zones consistent with changes in hazard designations by CAL FIRE.
Policy PS-2.7: Interagency Support. Participate in the mutual aid system and automatic
aid agreements to back up and supplement capabilities to respond to emergencies
Policy PS-2.10: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Protect communities from
unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones through the
following actions:
a. Minimize new residential development in very high fire hazard severity zones when
possible.
b. Require adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and emergency
vehicle access for new development in very high fire hazard severity zones.
c. Assess site constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to
avoid or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment.
d. Coordinate with RCFD to identify building and site design methods or other
methods to minimize damage if new structures are proposed to be in very high fire
hazard severity zones on undeveloped land and when rebuilding after a fire.
e. As part of the RCFD review process, require ongoing brush management, fuel
management/modification, defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other
project design features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high
wildfire risk.
Findings
Page 186 of 266
f. Coordinate with the applicable water district to ensure necessary water supply
systems and flow for structural fire suppression are provided and maintained.
g. Work with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction projects, including
community fire breaks and private road and public road clearance.
h. Coordinate with RCFD to define minimum standards for evacuation of residential
areas in very high fire hazard severity zones. If areas with inadequate
access/evacuation routes are identified, develop appropriate mitigation measures,
improvement plans, or education programs to ensure safe evacuation.
Policy PS-2.12: Hazard Mitigation Plans. Coordinate with local, state, and federal
agencies to update emergency, evacuation, and hazard mitigation plans, as necessary.
Policy PS-2.13: Essential Public Facilities and Infrastructure. Locate, when feasible,
new essential public facilities and infrastructure outside of very high fire hazard severity
zones, including but not limited to, hospitals and health care facilities, emergency shelters,
emergency command centers, emergency communication facilities, and utilities or identify
construction methods or other methods to minimize damage if these facilities must be
located in very high fire hazard severity zones.
Action PS-2a: Implement the City’s Emergency Operations Plan to ensure the most
effective allocation of resources for protection of people and property in time of an
emergency, and update it as needed
Goal PS-5: Emergency Operations. A community that is highly prepared and equipped
to handle emergency situations, in order to minimize loss of life, injury, property damage,
and disruption of vital services.
Policy PS-5.1: Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency
response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect
property in the City.
Policy PS-5.2: Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local
preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements
for emergency situations
Policy PS-5.3: Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to ensure the
resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of
critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery
Policy PS-5.4: Local Coordination. Coordinate with local key stakeholders (officials,
schools, businesses, and organizations) within the community to make them aware of their
role in the emergency plan and the necessary requirements in case of emergency.
Policy PS-5.5: Automatic and Mutual Aid. Participate in automatic and mutual aid
agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources,
facilities, and support services before, during, and after emergencies.
Findings
Page 187 of 266
Policy PS-5.6: Communications. Evaluate the potential to utilize a comprehensive
emergency communication system that allows for efficient connection in case of
emergency.
Policy PS-5.7: Emergency Evacuation Routes and Access. Work with RCFD and RCSD
to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation
routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.
Policy PS-5.8: Emergency Shelters. Periodically coordinate with emergency shelter
providers to ensure that necessary equipment supplies are available in case of emergency.
Policy PS-5.9: Disaster Recovery. Work with emergency service providers to implement
post-disaster recovery plans to return public services to a state of normalcy, address
ongoing hazard-specific mitigations, and assist community members in recovering from
disasters.
Policy PS-5.13: School Safety. Coordinate with local schools related to their programs
and practices regarding emergency preparedness.
Action PS-5b: Regularly practice implementation of the City’s Emergency Operations
Plan and update it regularly.
Action PS-5c: Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that
must be coordinated with City procedures.
Action PS-5f: Annually review and update the Emergency Preparedness Plan under the
provision of the State Emergency Management System format to maximize the efforts of
emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical, and law enforcement) and minimize
human suffering and property damage during disasters. Support high-level multi-
jurisdictional cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management.
Action PS-5g: Coordinate with local agencies and organizations to develop and distribute
informational brochures and give presentations to civic groups and local schools to educate
residents and businesses about appropriate actions to take during an emergency situation.
Goal PS-7: Climate Change and Resiliency Planning: A resilient, sustainable, and
equitable community where risks to life, property, the economy, and the environment
resulting from climate change, including extreme weather events, are minimized
Policy PS-7.1: Community Preparedness. Promote a well-prepared City that can
effectively overcome natural disasters and scarcity of resources due to climate change.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-6: Public Safety Resources. A community that safeguards persons and property
through the provision of high-quality public safety services and crime prevention measures.
Policy RM-6.1: Provision of Police and Fire Services. Encourage the Riverside County
Findings
Page 188 of 266
Sheriff’s Department and the Riverside County Fire Department to maintain adequate staff
and equipment to provide efficient, high quality, and responsive public safety services to
the San Jacinto community.
Action RM-6c: In cooperation with the school districts, police and fire departments, and
local, state, and federal emergency management agencies, implement an Emergency
Operation Center (EOC) to respond to and manage disasters. Provide annual training for
City staff in emergency management so that when they are called into action, they will be
able to distribute information and resources to the public effectively.
2. Pollutant Concentrations
Threshold: Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, would the project
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact WF-2, pages 5.20-14 through
5.20-17)
Explanation: The Study Area contains both SRAs and LRAs that are classified as
VHFHSZs (with SRAs also containing moderate to high FHSZs). The
Study Area also contains areas that are considered between low to extreme
fire threats to people. The General Plan Update land uses located within
these SRA VHFHSZs are largely designated Open Space, which would
preclude new development. Some portions of the Study Area within a FHSZ
are currently designated Specific Plan and rural, low- and medium density
residential. However, the General Plan Update does not propose changes to
the types of land uses that could occur within these areas when compared to
the existing General Plan. There are areas in the northwestern portion of the
City, outside of, but in proximity to FHSZs, that would allow for medium
density residential development under the proposed General Plan Update.
Future development of medium density residential uses would introduce
additional structures and people in proximity to open space areas identified
as a VHFHSZ. However, these areas are not identified as having a fire
threat.
Implementation of the General Plan Update would not substantially alter
the slope, prevailing winds, or other factors that would increase exposure to
San Jacinto residents, employees or visitors to increased pollutant
concentrations from wildfire or result in the uncontrollable spread of a
wildfire. Depending upon the specific site and associated geographical
conditions, future development within a FHSZ could exacerbate wildfire
risks. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address
wildfire hazards. For example, Policy RM-1.5 of the Resource Management
Element, and Policy LU-3.7 of the Land Use Element regulate hillside
development. Policy PS-2.1 protects communities from unreasonable risk
of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones. Any future projects
Findings
Page 189 of 266
contemplated under the General Plan Update would be required to comply
with the provisions of federal, State, and local requirements related to
wildland fire hazards, including State fire safety regulations associated with
wildland-urban interfaces, fire-safe building standards, and defensible
space requirements as part of the project’s approval process. As future
development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each
project would be evaluated for potential impacts, specific to that project,
associated with wildland fire hazards as required under CEQA. Potential
development within or near FHSZs, would be required to comply with
design and development standards set forth by the SJDC and Municipal
Code, including SJDC Chapter 17.300.050, which addresses development
of hillsides and requires preparation of fire management plans. Therefore,
with implementation of the applicable General Plan goals, policies,
implementation plans, and compliance to development and fire codes,
impacts are considered less than significant in this regard.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU 3.7: Hillside Development. Conserve hillsides by limiting development on
slopes greater than 25 percent and allowing unique planning techniques such as Specific
Plans, Planned Unit Developments, and clustered development to reduce grading
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-2: Fire Safety. A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire
emergencies.
Policy PS-2.4: Urban Fire Risks. Work with RCFD to maintain an ongoing fire inspection
program to reduce fire hazards associated with multifamily development, critical facilities,
public assembly facilities, industrial buildings, and nonresidential buildings.
Policy PS-2.10: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Protect communities from
unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones through the
following actions:
a. Minimize new residential development in very high fire hazard severity zones when
possible.
b. Require adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and emergency
vehicle access for new development in very high fire hazard severity zones.
c. Assess site constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to
avoid or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment.
d. Coordinate with RCFD to identify building and site design methods or other
methods to minimize damage if new structures are proposed to be in very high fire
Findings
Page 190 of 266
hazard severity zones on undeveloped land and when rebuilding after a fire.
e. As part of the RCFD review process, require ongoing brush management, fuel
management/modification, defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other
project design features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high
wildfire risk.
f. Coordinate with the applicable water district to ensure necessary water supply
systems and flow for structural fire suppression are provided and maintained.
g. Work with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction projects, including
community fire breaks and private road and public road clearance.
h. Coordinate with RCFD to define minimum standards for evacuation of residential
areas in very high fire hazard severity zones. If areas with inadequate
access/evacuation routes are identified, develop appropriate mitigation measures,
improvement plans, or education programs to ensure safe evacuation.
Policy PS-2.11: Fire Safe Design. Consider fire safe design (i.e., fire-resistant building
and site design, materials, and landscaping) for development within very high fire hazard
severity zones as part of the development review process.
a. Locate, design and construct development to provide adequate defensibility and
minimize the risk of structural loss from wildland fires.
b. Design development on hillsides and canyons to reduce the increased risk of fires
from topography features (i.e., steep slopes, ridge saddles).
c. Minimize flammable vegetation and implement brush management best practices
in accordance with the Development Code.
d. Install visible home and street addressing and signage.
Action PS-2b: Mitigate, as feasible, existing non-conforming development to
contemporary fire safe standards where feasible, including road standards and vegetative
hazards.
Action PS-2c: Require that all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the
most recent California Building and Fire Code with local amendments adopted by the City,
including the use of fire sprinklers in residential structures.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.5: Hillside Development. Require the orderly development of hillside areas
through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance.
Action RM-1e: For Hillside Development Projects, implement the City's Hillside
Development Standards to retain the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s
Findings
Page 191 of 266
eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development
on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.
Policy RM-4.7: Sensitive Receptors. Insulate sensitive receptors from areas of heightened
air quality pollution, by utilizing land use planning to buffer and protect residential areas.
Policy RM-4.8: Mitigation. Require the implementation of relevant mitigation measures
for all future development upon identification of potential air quality impacts.
Policy RM-4.10: GHG Reduction. Consider and adopt new local policies and programs
that will help to provide energy efficient alternatives to fossil fuel use and reduce
consumption in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the local
measures identified in the Western Riverside County Subregional Climate Action Plan for
San Jacinto.
Action RM-4b: As applicable, review new industrial and commercial development
projects during the CEQA process for potential air quality impacts to residences and other
sensitive receptors. Ensure that mitigation measures and best management practices are
implemented to reduce significant emissions of criteria pollutants.
3. Infrastructure Risks
Threshold: Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power
lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact WF-3, pages 5.20-17 through
5.20-21)
Explanation: Future development anticipated by the General Plan Update would require
the construction and installation of infrastructure, including roads water and
sewer and power lines to serve increased growth and development. The
General Plan Update land uses located within these SRA VHFHSZs are
largely designated Open Space, which would preclude new development.
The General Plan Update does not propose changes to the types of land uses
that could occur within areas identified as FHSZ when compared to the
existing General Plan. Development of infrastructure to serve new
development would primarily occur outside of areas identified as FHSZs.
The General Plan Update includes requirements for adequate water supply
and water flow availability, emergency access, fire protection services, fire
safe design site standards, and ensuring public awareness regarding fire
safety. Policy PS-2.1 protects communities from unreasonable risk of
wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones. Policy PS-5.1 ensures
the provision of sufficient levels of all emergency response services to
protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect property
in the City. Policy RM-9.1 maintains and implements public facility master
Findings
Page 192 of 266
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and
agencies, to ensure compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal
laws and to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement
improvements for public facilities and services in San Jacinto. Policy RM-
9.2 maintains and finances the capital improvement program to ensure the
timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the timely
provision of public facility and municipal improvements. Policy RM-9.3
ensures that all new development provides for and funds its fair share of the
costs for the expansion of public infrastructure, services, and facilities.
Policy RM-9.5 ensures collaboration with the various regional facility and
service providers to deliver high levels of service to San Jacinto, and to plan
for new development.
All future development projects would be required to be consistent with the
City’s municipal code standards related to development in high fire hazard
areas. Future development of utility infrastructure would be subject to the
requirements established in Public Resources Code Section 4292, which
requires clearing of flammable fuels for a minimum 10-foot radius from the
outer circumference of poles and towers; and Section 4293, which sets basic
requirements for clearances around electrical conductors. Furthermore,
future development would be required to meet vegetation clearance
requirements outlined in Title 14, Section 1104.1(d) of the California Code
of Regulations for single overhead facilities. Maintenance of existing
infrastructure and the potential installation of new infrastructure for future
projects in the Study Area would be required to comply with Fire Code
requirements found in the Municipal Code and SJDC for new development
projects. Proposed development would be reviewed by the RCFD to
determine the specific fire requirements applicable to ensure compliance
with the Fire Code. The potential for future projects to impact
environmental resources to meet compliance with fire development
standards such (as fuel breaks and clearance requirements) would require
site specific environmental evaluation under CEQA to identify any site-
specific impacts. In addition, any development in the City would need to
comply with the California Building Code, Public Resource Code, and the
City Municipal Code to ensure that new developments have access to
necessary utilities, and any additional utility construction complies with all
code requirements. Municipal Code Chapter 12.16, Underground utility
district, defines the process for which utility infrastructure can be erected or
removed in the City. Further, Chapter 15.32, Utility installations,
establishes the requirement of complying with the California Public
Utilities Commission Rules and Regulations. As demonstrated throughout
this EIR, implementation of the various policies and actions contained in
the General Plan Update would reduce potential impacts associated with the
construction and expansion of infrastructure. Implementation of the General
Plan Update policies and actions, combined with local and State
requirements, as discussed previously, would ensure that potential wildland
Findings
Page 193 of 266
fire hazards would not be exacerbated by local infrastructure, and this
impact would be reduced to a less than significant level.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-2: Fire Safety. A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire
emergencies.
Policy PS-2.10: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Protect communities from
unreasonable risk of wildfire within very high fire hazard severity zones through the
following actions:
a. Minimize new residential development in very high fire hazard severity zones when
possible.
b. Require adequate fire protection services, fire protection plans, and emergency
vehicle access for new development in very high fire hazard severity zones.
c. Assess site constraints when considering land use designations near wildlands to
avoid or minimize wildfire hazards as part of a land use update or amendment.
d. Coordinate with RCFD to identify building and site design methods or other
methods to minimize damage if new structures are proposed to be in very high fire
hazard severity zones on undeveloped land and when rebuilding after a fire.
e. As part of the RCFD review process, require ongoing brush management, fuel
management/modification, defensible space, fire retardant landscaping, and other
project design features for new development located in areas of or adjacent to high
wildfire risk.
f. Coordinate with the applicable water district to ensure necessary water supply
systems and flow for structural fire suppression are provided and maintained.
g. Work with RCFD to identify and maintain fire hazard reduction projects, including
community fire breaks and private road and public road clearance.
h. Coordinate with RCFD to define minimum standards for evacuation of residential
areas in very high fire hazard severity zones. If areas with inadequate
access/evacuation routes are identified, develop appropriate mitigation measures,
improvement plans, or education programs to ensure safe evacuation.
Goal PS-5: Emergency Operations. A community that is highly prepared and equipped
to handle emergency situations, in order to minimize loss of life, injury, property damage,
and disruption of vital services.
Policy PS-5.1: Emergency Response Services. Provide sufficient levels of all emergency
Findings
Page 194 of 266
response services to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all persons and to protect
property in the City.
Policy PS-5.2: Emergency Preparedness Plans. Support the development of local
preparedness plans and multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication agreements
for emergency situations
Policy PS-5.3: Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to ensure the
resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of
critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery
Policy PS-5.4: Local Coordination. Coordinate with local key stakeholders (officials,
schools, businesses, and organizations) within the community to make them aware of their
role in the emergency plan and the necessary requirements in case of emergency.
Policy PS-5.5: Automatic and Mutual Aid. Participate in automatic and mutual aid
agreements with adjacent service providers to ensure efficient and adequate resources,
facilities, and support services before, during, and after emergencies.
Policy PS-5.6: Communications. Evaluate the potential to utilize a comprehensive
emergency communication system that allows for efficient connection in case of
emergency.
Policy PS-5.7: Emergency Evacuation Routes and Access. Work with RCFD and RCSD
to maintain, update, and regularly exercise emergency access, protocols, and evacuation
routes to assess their effectiveness under a range of emergency scenarios.
Policy PS-5.8: Emergency Shelters. Periodically coordinate with emergency shelter
providers to ensure that necessary equipment supplies are available in case of emergency.
Policy PS-5.9: Disaster Recovery. Work with emergency service providers to implement
post-disaster recovery plans to return public services to a state of normalcy, address
ongoing hazard-specific mitigations, and assist community members in recovering from
disasters.
Policy PS-5.13: School Safety. Coordinate with local schools related to their programs
and practices regarding emergency preparedness.
Action PS-5b: Regularly practice implementation of the City’s Emergency Operations
Plan and update it regularly.
Action PS-5c: Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that
must be coordinated with City procedures.
Action PS-5f: Annually review and update the Emergency Preparedness Plan under the
provision of the State Emergency Management System form at to maximize the efforts of
emergency service providers (e.g., fire, medical, and law enforcement) and minimize
human suffering and property damage during disasters. Support high-level multi-
Findings
Page 195 of 266
jurisdictional cooperation and communication for emergency planning and management.
Action PS-5g: Coordinate with local agencies and organizations to develop and distribute
informational brochures and give presentations to civic groups and local schools to educate
residents and businesses about appropriate actions to take during an emergency situation.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-9: Infrastructure Planning. A community that provides adequate, reliable
infrastructure and facilities to support existing and future development.
Policy RM-9.1: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master
plans, in collaboration with appropriate outside service providers and agencies, to ensure
compliance with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws and to identify infrastructure
needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in
San Jacinto.
Policy RM-9.2: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement
program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and the
timely provision of public facility and municipal improvements.
4. Runoff Risks
Threshold: Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including
downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-
fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact WF-4, pages 5.20-21 through
5.20-25)
Explanation: The General Plan Update would allow development and improvement
projects that would involve some land clearing, grading, and other ground-
disturbing activities that could temporarily increase soil erosion rates during
and shortly after project construction. All future developments located in or
adjacent to wildfire prone areas (i.e., naturally vegetated hillsides) would be
required to prepare a fire management plan pursuant to SJDC Section
17.300.050. The fire management plan is subject to the review and approval
of the RCFD. The RCFD may require fire protection measures (e.g.,
landscape or open space buffers), maintenance programs for weed and
vegetation abatement, installation of fire-resistant plants, and the use of
noncombustible building materials, including roofing. Areas with slopes
correspond with the areas identified as having greater landslide risk and
correspond with areas that are designated as FHSZs. Within the Study Area,
these include Park Hill, the western edge of the Study Area along Lakeview
Mountains, and the eastern portion of the Sphere of Influence along the San
Jacinto Mountains.
Findings
Page 196 of 266
Chapter 15.28 of the Municipal Code regulates development of hillside
areas by relating the number and distribution of dwelling units and other
buildings to the topography to prevent disfigurement of the terrain through
extensive cut and fill. These regulations are also designed to minimize
danger to life and property due to the hazards of fire, flood, soil erosion,
seepage and destruction of natural topography and plant material.
Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also be analyzed
for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of
CEQA. With adherence to the Municipal and Development Codes, future
development on sloped terrain prone to flooding, landslides, and instability
will not have adverse effects on the environment.
Future development resulting from implementation of the General Plan
Update could increase the potential for flooding in a number of ways: new
development and redevelopment could increase storm water velocity
leading to off-site flooding; new development and redevelopment could
impede or redirect flood flows; and the placement of new or redevelopment
projects could create or contribute to runoff which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. However,
future development and redevelopment projects would be required to
comply with applicable federal, State, regional, and local plans, policies,
and regulations to address site-specific drainage and potential flooding
risks. Specifically, future site-specific development would be required to
comply with Municipal Code Chapter 15.40, Floodplain Management,
which provides land use and development regulations to all land within
flood prone, mudslide (i.e., mudflow), or flood-related erosion areas,
including City review of development permits to ensure adherence to
federal, State, and local flood-related regulations as well as additional
standards applicable to all areas of special flood hazards in the City. Future
development projects would be reviewed by the City to determine if a
project site is located within areas of special flood hazards and thus subject
to additional provisions set forth in Chapter 15.40. Additionally,
construction of storm drainage improvements would occur as part of an
overall development or infrastructure project, and would be considered in
the environmental review associated with the specific project being
proposed.
The General Plan Update Public Safety Element and Resource Management
Element’s goals, policies, and actions would limit exposure between people
and structures with wildfire risks. Policy PS-1.5 requires the assessment
and mitigation of hazards related to liquefaction, landslides, and flooding
for new development projects or City improvement projects that are
identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards. Goal RM-2, Water
Resources is intended to hinder potential threats related to flooding, runoff,
and drainage. Through compliance with local, State, and federal
regulations, and compliance with General Plan Update goals and policies,
Findings
Page 197 of 266
potential exposure of people or structures to significant risks resulting from
runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes would be less than
significant.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Seismic and Geologic Hazards. A community that is adequately prepared for
natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity.
Policy PS-1.5: Development. Require assessment and mitigation of hazards related to
liquefaction, landslides, and flooding for new development projects or City improvement
projects that are identified by the City as susceptible to these hazards.
Action PS-1d: Reduce the risk to the community from hazards related to geologic
conditions, seismic activity, flooding, and wildfires by requiring feasible mitigation of such
impacts on development projects. Assess development proposals for potential hazards
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Require measures to mitigate all
identified significant public safety hazards.
Goal PS-2: Fire Safety. A City that is safe and adequately prepared for urban and wildfire
emergencies.
Policy PS-2.11: Fire Safe Design. Consider fire safe design (i.e., fire-resistant building
and site design, materials, and landscaping) for development within very high fire hazard
severity zones as part of the development review process.
a. Locate, design and construct development to provide adequate defensibility and
minimize the risk of structural loss from wildland fires.
b. Design development on hillsides and canyons to reduce the increased risk of fires
from topography features (i.e., steep slopes, ridge saddles).
c. Minimize flammable vegetation and implement brush management best practices
in accordance with the Development Code.
d. Install visible home and street addressing and signage.
Goal PS-3: Flood Hazards. A community that is protected from flood hazards.
Policy PS-3.7: Stormwater Runoff. Encourage new developments that add impervious
surfaces to integrate low impact development best management practices to reduce
stormwater runoff.
Policy PS-3.8: Development in the Flood Plain and Flood Way. Protect the community
from flooding hazards by providing and maintaining flood control facilities and limiting
development within the flood plain and flood way as necessary to protect public health and
Findings
Page 198 of 266
safety.
Policy PS-3.10: Changing Conditions. Coordinate with the RCDCD to consider the need
to expand the capacity of flood control facilities based on changing flood conditions
associated with climate change and extreme weather.
Policy PS-3.11: Mitigation. Require that all new development and redevelopment in areas
susceptible to flooding incorporate mitigation measures designed to reduce flood hazards.
Policy PS-3.12: Adequate Infrastructure. Maintain and regularly assess the status of
local storm drainage infrastructure to ensure that the system is functioning property.
Action PS-3i: Continue to implement the Flood Plain Management program, which
establishes rules and regulations for flood plain management. Continue to apply the rules
and regulations to development in areas of special flood hazards as determined by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and as illustrated on the most recent
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural
resources.
Policy RM-1.5: Hillside Development. Require the orderly development of hillside areas
through compliance with the City’s Hillside Development Ordinance.
Action RM-1c: Work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result
in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian
habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological
resources.
Action RM-1e: For Hillside Development Projects, implement the City's Hillside
Development Standards to retain the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s
eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development
on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.
Action RM-1f: During the development review process, ensure proper geotechnical and
soil management techniques are implemented. To enforce this, the City Engineer or
Director may request the completion of a survey of soil and geologic conditions by a State
licensed Engineering Geologist and Civil Engineer, where appropriate. When potential
geologic impacts are identified, require project applicants to mitigate the impacts per the
recommendations contained within the survey.
Action RM-1g: Where feasible, incorporate open space and passive recreational uses into
areas identified to have significant hazards related to flooding, geologic conditions, and
seismic events.
Findings
Page 199 of 266
Goal RM-2: Water Resources. A community that protects and conserves limited water
resources.
Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to
watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining
these resources in their natural condition if feasible.
Policy RM-2.5: Stormwater. Work cooperatively with local water agencies to effectively
and efficiently manage stormwater runoff as part of the City’s multipronged water
conservation strategy.
Action RM-2a: To reduce soil erosion and pollutants in urban runoff, require new
development and redevelopment projects control stormwater runoff through
implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent any deterioration of
water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. Existing
development shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. As specific
development projects are implemented, project proponents will be required to consult with
relevant agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG). Also, ensure that projects of one acre or more complete a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to California Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) Santa Ana Region – Order No. 00-65 and the City’s MS4 permit (order no. R8-
2002-0011 (NPDES No. CAS 618033).
Findings
Page 200 of 266
SECTION III
IMPACTS THAT ARE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION
INCORPORATED
There are no impacts that require mitigation above and beyond implementation of the
policies and actions included in the General Plan.
SECTION IV
IMPACTS THAN CANNOT BE FULLY MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN
SIGNIFICANT LEVEL
The City Council hereby finds that, despite the incorporation of General Plan goals,
policies, and actions identified in the EIR and in these Findings, the following environmental
impacts cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level and a Statement of Overriding
Considerations is therefore included herein:
A. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
1. Farmland Conversion
Threshold: Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact AG-1, pages 5.2-7 through
5.2-9)
Explanation: There are approximately 3,309 acres of Important Farmlands located within
the Study Area, including approximately 413 acres of Prime Farmland,
1,758 acres of Statewide Importance, and 1,138 acres of Unique Farmland.
However, not all land designated as Important Farmlands (Prime, Statewide
Importance, and Unique) are currently being utilized for agricultural uses.
Some of the agricultural lands in use or identified as Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance by the FMMP are
within adopted Specific Plan areas (The Villages of San Jacinto, The Trails,
and The Esplanade). These Specific Plan areas have been identified for
development and the conversion of farmlands to non-agricultural use were
previously contemplated and analyzed as part of the environmental review
for each Specific Plan area. Implementation of the proposed General Plan
Update would not result in new or increased impacts to Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance within the
Villages of San Jacinto, The Trails or The Esplanade Specific Plan areas.
Future development associated with the implementation of the General Plan
Update and changes in the economy would likely result in the conversion
of many of these areas for urban uses. Because there are no exclusive
Findings
Page 201 of 266
agricultural land use designations included as part of the General Plan
Update, future development could convert existing agricultural resources
and Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide
Importance to non-agricultural uses. It is assumed that as development
occurs, the agricultural viability of the Important Farmlands within the
Study Area would be reduced. However, it is anticipated that some
agricultural uses would continue to operate during the 20-year life of the
General Plan and the General Plan Update Land Use Element includes
policies and actions to support continued agricultural activities. For
example, Policy LU-2.4 which allows and supports for the continuation of
agricultural operations on lands within the City limits that are designated
for development uses. Action LU-2e gives priority to redevelopment and
infill projects that reduce development pressure on agricultural lands.
Action LU-2f directs the City to work with property owners and agricultural
operations interested in retaining agricultural lands.
Adoption of the proposed General Plan Update would not lead to the direct
conversion of designated Important Farmland, but rather, would continue
the existing land use pattern in San Jacinto that calls for ongoing infill
development and urbanization within the City. However, since the General
Plan Update does not require the preservation of designated farmland,
implementation of the General Plan Update could result in the conversion
of farmland to non-agricultural uses. Any additional mitigation measures,
such as the preservation of designated farmland, are not feasible and conflict
with the other objectives of the General Plan Update, specifically to
“proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a
responsible manner” and “attract and retain businesses and industries that
provide jobs for local residents”, and would potentially discourage future
development envisioned in the General Plan Update.
Although the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to support
continued agricultural use within the Study Area, the potential for the
conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland and Farmland of
Statewide Importance as identified by the FMMP to non-agricultural use
would be a significant unavoidable impact.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-2.4: Agricultural Uses Allow and support the continuation of agricultural
operations on lands within the City limits that are designated for development uses, until
such time as new development is proposed for the land.
Action LU-2e: Give priority to redevelopment and infill projects that reduce development
pressure on agricultural lands and other sensitive resources.
Findings
Page 202 of 266
Action LU-2f: Work with property owners and agricultural operations interested in
retaining agricultural land to identify feasible ways to maintain the land in agricultural
production. Apply agricultural conservation easements to land desired by the City and the
property owner to remain as agricultural land.
2. Williamson Act Lands
Threshold: Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact AG-2, pages 5.2-9 through
5.2-10)
Explanation: Although the General Plan Update does not include any zone changes at
this time, a future zoning update is anticipated to bring zoning into
compliance with the General Plan Update. However, since the City does not
have any zoning districts exclusive to agriculture uses, the General Plan
Update, and subsequent zoning code update, would not conflict with
existing zoning for agricultural use.
Future development projects resulting from implementation of the General
Plan Update could potentially conflict with parcels assessed as
agriculturally preserved. 18 parcels totaling 514 acres located within the
western portion of the Study Area, and within a pocket area towards the
northern perimeter of the City limits, are currently assessed by the Riverside
County Assessor as agriculturally preserved. The General Plan Update land
use designations for these parcels allow for non-agricultural uses including
mixed-use and residential. Additionally, lands within the surrounding area
are identified for urban development. Because there are no exclusive
agricultural land use designations included as part of the General Plan
Update, it is possible that future development associated with the
implementation of the General Plan Update and changes in the economy
would result in the conversion of preserved agricultural properties to urban
uses. The General Plan Update Land Use Element includes policies and
actions to support continued agricultural activities, including Policy LU-2.4
which allows and supports the continuation of agricultural operations on
lands within the City limits that are designated for development uses, until
such time as new development is proposed for the land. Action LU-2f
directs the City to work with property owners and agricultural operations
interested in retaining agricultural land to identify ways to maintain
agricultural production; agricultural conservation easements may be applied
to land desired to remain as agricultural land.
Adoption of the proposed General Plan Update would not lead to the direct
conversion of preserved agricultural lands, but rather, would continue the
existing land use pattern in San Jacinto that calls for ongoing infill
development and urbanization within the City. Since the General Plan
Findings
Page 203 of 266
Update does not require the preservation of agricultural land,
implementation of the General Plan Update could result in the conversion
of agriculturally-utilized properties to non-agricultural uses as future
development occurs. Development of land surrounding preserved parcels
may indirectly cause these parcels to transition to non-agricultural use in the
future. Any additional mitigation measures, such as the preservation of
designated farmland, are not feasible and conflict with the other objectives
of the General Plan Update, specifically to “proactively plan for and
accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner” and
“attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs for local
residents”, and would potentially discourage future development envisioned
in the General Plan Update. Although the General Plan Update includes
policies and actions to support continued agricultural use within the Study
Area, the potential for future development to conflict with a preserved or
Williamson Act contract would be a significant unavoidable impact.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-2.4: Agricultural Uses. Allow and support the continuation of agricultural
operations on lands within the City limits that are designated for development uses, until
such time as new development is proposed for the land.
Action LU-2f: Work with property owners and agricultural operations interested in
retaining agricultural land to identify feasible ways to maintain the land in agricultural
production. Apply agricultural conservation easements to land desired by the City and the
property owner to remain as agricultural land.
3. Other Changes
Threshold: Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to
non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact AG-3, pages 5.2-10
through 5.2-11)
Explanation: There are no forest lands within the Study Area, nor are there suitable
environmental conditions for forest land to be developed; therefore,
implementation of the proposed Project will not result in the conversion of
forest land to non-forest use.
The General Plan Update does not designate any lands specifically for
agricultural use, nor does it propose the direct conversion of existing
Farmland to non-agricultural use. Nonetheless, implementation of the
General Plan Update could intensify uses within the Study Area in a manner
Findings
Page 204 of 266
that would further reduce the feasibility of agricultural production.
Therefore, implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would
result in other changes in the existing environment which, due to location
or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use.
The General Plan Update Land Use Element includes policies and actions
to support continued agricultural activities. For example, Policy LU-3.6
ensures that new urban uses proposed adjacent to lands designated for
agricultural uses include adequate buffers to reduce potential land use
conflicts and nuisance impacts to sensitive receptors. Action LU-3e states
that during both redevelopment and new development projects, the
provision and maintenance of setbacks an buffers, such as roadways, and
topographic features is to be encouraged to prevent incompatibilities
between agricultural and non-agricultural use. Additionally, SJDC Section
17.305.040, Agriculture Preservation (Right-to-Farm) provides the
declared policy of the City to preserve, protect, and encourage development
of its agricultural land consistent with Civil Code Section 3482.5. Section
3482.5 provides that no agricultural activity, operation, or facility, or
appurtenances, conducted or maintained for commercial purposes, and in a
manner consistent with proper and accepted customs and standards, as
established and followed by similar agricultural operations in the same
locality, shall be or become a nuisance, private or public, due to any
changed condition in or about the locality, after it has been in operation for
more than three years if it was not a nuisance at the time it began. Any
additional mitigation measures, such as the preservation of designated
farmland, are not feasible and conflict with the other objectives of the
General Plan Update, specifically to “proactively plan for and accommodate
local and regional growth in a responsible manner” and “attract and retain
businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents”, and would
potentially discourage future development envisioned in the General Plan
Update. Although implementation of the General Plan Update policies and
actions and the SJDC would assist in reducing the potential for some
existing Farmland to convert to non-agricultural uses, it is anticipated that
changes in the existing environment associated with future development
anticipated by the General Plan Update would result in the conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use and impacts would be significant and
unavoidable.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-3.6: Agricultural Compatibility. Ensure that new urban uses that are proposed
adjacent to lands designated for agricultural uses include adequate buffers to reduce
potential land use conflicts and nuisance impacts to sensitive receptors.
Action LU-3e: During both redevelopment and the development of new projects,
encourage the provision and maintenance of setbacks and buffers, such as roadways,
Findings
Page 205 of 266
topographic features, and open space, to prevent incompatibilities between agricultural and
non-agricultural land uses.
B. AIR QUALITY
1. Cumulatively Considerable Pollutant Emissions
Threshold: Would the project result in cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under the
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact AQ-2, pages 5.3-32
through 5.3-38)
Explanation: The SCAQMD has established numerical significance thresholds for
regional emissions during construction and operation. Daily emissions were
estimated for the construction of the land uses provided in the General Plan
Update. The calculations used to develop construction emissions
incorporate compliance with applicable dust control measures required to
be implemented during each phase of construction by SCAQMD Rule 403
(Control of Fugitive Dust), and fugitive VOC control measures required to
be implemented by architectural coating emission factors based on
SCAQMD Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings); however, the construction-
related daily emissions would exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds
for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Therefore, short-term regional
construction emissions would be potentially significant. Additionally,
operation of future development accommodated by the General Plan Update
would generate criteria air pollutant emissions from project-generated
vehicle trips traveling within the City, energy sources such as natural gas
combustion, and area sources such as landscaping equipment and consumer
products usage. Operational emissions for future development
accommodated by the General Plan Update would exceed regulatory
thresholds for VOC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. While these thresholds are
the only thresholds available for numerically determining significance, it
should be noted that these thresholds were specifically developed for use in
determining significance for individual projects and not for program-level
documents, such as the General Plan Update. However, as emissions for
VOC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 exceed regulatory thresholds, the regional
operational emissions would be potentially significant. With respect to
operational emissions, future development under the General Plan Update
would be required to comply with AQMP, SIP, CARB, SCAQMD
regulations, Title 24 energy efficiency standards, and the General Plan
Update’s policies and actions. Policy RM-4.2 of the General Plan Update
Resources Management Element requires the City to coordinate with
CARB and SCAQMD to enforce the standards of the Clean Air Act. Policy
RM-4.6 encourages and incentivizes higher density and mixed-use
development opportunities to lessen the impacts of traffic congestion on
Findings
Page 206 of 266
local air quality. Policy RM-4.8 requires the implementation of relevant
mitigation measures for all future development upon identification of
potential air quality impacts. Action RM-5e provides for the continue
review of development projects to ensure that all new public and private
development complies with Title 24 energy standards, as well as the energy
efficiency standards established by the General Plan Update and the
Municipal Code. However, as there is no way to determine the effectiveness
of such regulations, policies, and actions for individual projects, it is
impossible to determine if potential impacts would be reduced to below
regulatory thresholds. There are no feasible criteria air pollutant reduction
measures beyond those identified in the General Plan Update that would
reduce impacts. While implementation of these policies and actions would
reduce criteria pollutant emissions, the extent to which the impacts would
need to be determined on a project-by-project basis, as necessary.
Therefore, this impact is significant and unavoidable.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and
enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes
efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse
gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures
compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this
Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-4: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Improved air quality in San
Jacinto and the region through reductions in air pollutants and greenhouse gas (GHG
emissions).
Policy RM-4.1: Regional Cooperation. Support regional efforts, including those
organized through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern California
Association of Governments, the Western Riverside Council of Governments, and the
California Air Resource Board (CARB) to implement the regional Air Quality
Management Plan.
Policy RM-4.2: Measurement and Enforcement. Coordinate with the California Air
Resources Board and South Coast Air Quality Management District to properly measure
air quality at emission sources and enforce the standards of the Clean Air Act.
Policy RM-4.4: Transportation Options. Promote alternative modes of transportation to
reduce vehicular emissions and improve air quality. (See Mobility Element)
Policy RM-4.5: Walkability. Encourage pedestrian-scale development and pedestrian-
Findings
Page 207 of 266
friendly design features to reduce vehicle emissions. (See Mobility Element)
Policy RM-4.6: Sustainable Development. Encourage and incentivize higher density and
mixed-use development opportunities within designated areas of the City to lessen the
impacts of traffic congestion on local air quality. (See Land Use Element)
Policy RM-4.7: Sensitive Receptors. Insulate sensitive receptors from areas of heightened
air quality pollution, by utilizing land use planning to buffer and protect residential areas.
Policy RM-4.8: Mitigation. Require the implementation of relevant mitigation measures
for all future development upon identification of potential air quality impacts.
Policy RM-4.8: Public Engagement. Promote regional air quality programs in order to
inform the public on regional air quality concerns and encourage the engagement of all San
Jacinto residents in future planning decisions related to air quality.
Action RM-4b: Review all new industrial and commercial development projects for
potential air quality impacts to residences and other sensitive receptors. Ensure that
mitigation measures and best management practices are implemented to reduce significant
emissions of criteria pollutants.
Action RM-4c: Review development, infrastructure, and planning projects for consistency
with SCAQMD requirements during the CEQA review process. Require project applicants
to prepare air quality analyses to address SCAQMD and General Plan requirements, which
include analysis and identification of:
1. Air pollutant emissions associated with the project during construction, project
operation, and cumulative conditions.
2. Potential exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants.
3. Significant air quality impacts associated with the project for construction, project
operation, and cumulative conditions.
4. Mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts to less than significant or the
maximum extent feasible where impacts cannot be mitigated to less than
significant.
Action RM-4d: Work with the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern
California Association of Governments, the Western Riverside Council of Governments,
and the California Air Resource Board (CARB) to implement programs aimed at
improving regional air quality.
Action RM-4n: Future development projects implemented under the General Plan will be
required to demonstrate consistency with SCAQMD construction emission thresholds.
Where emissions from individual projects exceed SCAQMD thresholds, the following
actions shall be incorporated as necessary to minimize impacts. These measures do not
exclude the use of other, equally effective mitigation measures.
Findings
Page 208 of 266
Require all off-road diesel equipment greater than 50 horsepower (hp) used for this
Project to meet USEPA Tier 4 final off-road emission standards or equivalent. Such
equipment shall be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT)
devices including a California Air Resources Board Certified Level 3 Diesel
Particulate Filter (DPF) or equivalent. The DPF reduces diesel particulate matter
and NOx emissions during construction activities.
Require a minimum of 50 percent of construction debris be diverted for recycling.
Require building materials to contain a minimum 10 percent recycled content.
Require materials such as paints, primers, sealants, coatings, and glues to have a
low volatile organic compound concentration compared to conventional products.
If low VOC materials are not available, architectural coating phasing should be
extended sufficiently to reduce the daily emissions of VOCs.
Action RM-4o: Future development projects implemented under the General Plan will be
required to demonstrate consistency with SCAQMD’s operational emission thresholds. For
projects where operational emissions exceed regulatory thresholds, the following measures
may be used to reduce impacts. Note the following measures are not all inclusive and
developers have the option to add or substitute measures that are equally or more
appropriate for the scope of the project.
Develop a project specific TDM program for residents and/or employees that
provides opportunities for carpool/vanpools.
Provide onsite solar/renewable energy in excess of regulatory requirements.
Require that owners/tenants of non-residential or multi-family residential
developments use architectural coatings that are 10 grams per liter or less when
repainting/repairing properties.
Require dripless irrigation and irrigation sensor units that prevent watering during
rain storms.
Ensure all parking areas are wired for capability of future EV charging and include
EV charging stations that exceed regulatory requirements.
Goal RM-5: Energy and Mineral Resources. A community that safely manages its
energy and mineral resources.
Policy RM-5.1: San Jacinto Power. Continue to make clean, modern, and cost-effective
energy options available to individuals who live and work in San Jacinto.
Policy RM-5.2: Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with all state requirements
regarding the generation of power and encourage energy providers to investigate the use
or expansion of renewable sources of energy.
Findings
Page 209 of 266
Policy RM-5.3: Renewable Energy. Promote the development and use of renewable
energy resources to reduce dependency on fossil fuels.
Policy RM-5.4: Energy-Efficient Materials. Promote the use of energy-efficient
materials, equipment, and design in public and private facilities and infrastructure.
Policy RM-5.9: Promote Energy Conservation in Existing Building Stock. Promote
energy conservation by residents and businesses in existing structures, through the City’s
newsletter, flyers, and website, in close coordination with other agencies and local energy
providers, including the SCAQMD and Southern California Edison.
2. Sensitive Receptors
Threshold: Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact 3.3-3, pages 3.3-35
through 3.3-37)
Explanation: Criteria air pollutant emissions have the potential to result in health impacts
on sensitive receptors located near new development within the Study Area.
Based on the nature and extent of new development, nearby sensitive
receptors could be exposed to levels of toxic air contaminants that could
result in a potential increase in cancer, acute, and/or chronic risk. Because
the exact nature, location, and operation of the future developments are
unknown, and because health risk impacts from TACs are cumulative over
the life of the nearby receptors, quantification of potential health risks
would be speculative. However, as construction and operation of these
future developments would occur within close proximity to sensitive
receptors, there is the potential for risk to exceed regulatory levels.
Additionally, without knowing the exact specifications for all projects that
may be developed under the General Plan Update, there is no way to
accurately calculate the potential for health impacts from the overall
General Plan Update. Individual projects would be required to provide their
own environmental assessments to determine health impacts from the
construction and operation of their projects. The proposed policies of the
General Plan Update would potentially reduce emissions, which could
potentially reduce impacts related to conflicts with an applicable air quality
plan. Goal RM-4 of the General Plan Update Resources Management
Element addresses potential air quality impacts by supporting projects,
programs, policies and regulations that reduce impacts to air quality by
private and public construction projects. Specifically, Policy RM-4.7
addresses potential air quality impacts to sensitive receptors. Policy LU-1.1
of the General Plan Update Land Use Element promotes a land use pattern
that would reduce pollution and air quality impacts. With respect to local
air quality emissions, toxic air contaminant emissions, and health impacts,
future development under the General Plan Update would be required to
Findings
Page 210 of 266
comply with AQMP, SIP, CARB, SCAQMD regulations, Title 24 energy
efficiency standards, and the proposed General Plan Update policies and
actions. However, the exact location, type, nature, and size of future projects
that may expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations cannot be
calculated at this time, as the details of potential future projects are not
currently known. As such, there is no way to determine the extent to which
these regulations will be, or need to be, implemented, and it is impossible
to determine if potential impacts would be reduced to below regulatory
thresholds. Additionally, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond
the policies and actions listed in the General Plan Update. Therefore,
localized operational impacts, construction and operational health and toxic
air impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.
C. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
1. Candidate, Sensitive, or Special Status Species
Threshold: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact BIO-1, pages 5.4-24
through 5.4-28)
Explanation: Future development associated with the General Plan Update would
increase urbanization throughout the City with the potential to result in
direct or indirect impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special-status species.
Pursuant to the special-status species search, 45 special-status plant species
and 59 special-status wildlife species are located within a 12-quad search of
San Jacinto and are considered candidate, sensitive, or special status under
FESA, CESA and/or CNPS/CRPR designation. There are seven sensitive
natural communities within the 12-quad search area. The implementation of
the MSHCP for future implementing projects consistent with the General
Plan Update at a project-specific level would minimize direct, indirect, and
cumulative biological impacts. The MSHCP was prepared to provide for the
take and mitigation of the 146 species covered under the MSHCP pursuant
to the FESA, which includes most of the species identified in the special-
status species search. The MSHCP allows for the issuance of take at the
local level, by MSHCP Permittees including the City, thereby streamlining
the take authorization process on a project by-project basis. Any open space
set aside on a site or conserved elsewhere (for example, as part of MSHCP
requirements) would provide protected habitat for the benefit of the
common species as well as sensitive and protected species. As required by
the MSHCP Implementing Agreement (Section 8.5), payment of the Local
Development Mitigation Fee and compliance with all applicable
Findings
Page 211 of 266
requirements of the MSHCP provides full mitigation under CEQA, NEPA,
FESA, and CESA for all direct, indirect and cumulative impacts to MSHCP
covered species and habitats. The MSHCP also addresses indirect impacts
through defined sub-areas consisting of habitats of appropriate size,
configuration, and vegetation characteristics that specific covered species
may live in or move through, as well as MSHCP fees. Furthermore, for
MSHCP covered species, the Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) (State Clearinghouse No. 2001101108, CEQ
Number 020463, ERP Number SFW-K99032-CA) prepared for the
MSHCP was a project-specific EIR/EIS and found that with a combination
of impact reduction features incorporated into the MSHCP, including
reserve configuration, adaptive management and monitoring, and species
survey and avoidance/minimization policies, development consistent with
the MSHCP would have less than significant impacts to covered species.
Subsequent development under the proposed General Plan Update could
result in direct impacts to certain species found present on an individual
project site, particularly those not covered by the MSHCP. Future
development projects would be required to adhere to applicable federal,
State, and local regulations that provide for sensitive species as part of the
discretionary approval process for site-specific development projects.
Compliance with applicable regulations at the time of future development
would minimize adverse impacts to sensitive species. Additionally, the
General Plan Update Resource Management Element includes policies and
actions to preserve and protect biological resources within the Study Area.
Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated open space system that
reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity. Policy RM-1.3 preserve and
enhances biological communities that contribute to the region’s
biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered plant and
wildlife species in accordance with State and federal resource agency
requirements. Policy RM-1.4 addresses regional cooperation by
recognizing areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to open space and
biological resources, such as the County MSHCP, and coordinating the
City’s actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside
County to protect and maximize regional open space. Policy RM-1.6 would
conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally
native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where
appropriate. Action RM-1c directs the City to work closely with the
USACE, USFWS, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife
(CDFW) during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of
any project that may result in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the
removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian habitats, disturb Waters of
the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological resources. Action
RM-1d directs the City to cooperate with the County to develop and manage
preserve areas within the urban landscape. During the review of
Findings
Page 212 of 266
development proposals, the City would use the MSHCP (particularly
Section 3.2.13 San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project
impacts and mitigation requirements. Development in the City shall be
required to comply with the applicable terms of the MSHCP including, but
not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow endemic surveys,
riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located
within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project
Review as appropriate. Further, Action RM-1i addresses potential resources
outside of the MSHCP area to ensure they are identified and addressed as
part of the development review process. Action RM-1j would ensure that
surveys are conducted if vegetation and tree removal is proposed to occur
during the nesting bird season and to provide for buffers if active nests are
confirmed. Adherence to these policies and actions during the discretionary
review of future development projects would serve to minimize impacts to
sensitive species. Although numerous regulations including
implementation of the MSHCP and General Plan Update policies and
actions would minimize impacts to sensitive species, at a program level of
review, it cannot be ensured that all impacts could be reduced to less than
significant at the site-specific level. Therefore, potential impacts to
candidate, sensitive, or special status species would be considered
significant and unavoidable.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural
resources.
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.3: Biological Resource Protection. Preserve and enhance biological
communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive,
rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with state and federal resource
agency requirements.
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible
and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects
where appropriate.
Findings
Page 213 of 266
Action RM-1c: Work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result
in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian
habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological
resources.
Action RM-1d: Cooperate with the County of Riverside to develop and manage preserve
areas within the urban landscape. During the review of development proposals, use the
Western Riverside County MSHCP Habitat Conservation Plan (particularly Section 3.2.13
San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation
requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable
terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow
endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located
within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as
appropriate.
Action RM-1i: During the development review process, require Applicants of
developments with the potential to reduce or eliminate habitat for native plant and wildlife
species or sensitive habitats not covered by the MSHCP, as determined by the City of San
Jacinto’s Community Development Department, to prepare a site-specific general
biological resources survey to identify the presence of any sensitive biological resources,
including any sensitive plant or wildlife species. The report shall identify the need for
focused presence/absence surveys and identify the presence of state or federal regulated
wetlands or waters. Required surveys shall be conducted by qualified biologists and/or
botanists in accordance with California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and/or
United States Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) survey protocols for target species. If
no sensitive species are observed during the field survey then no further mitigation will be
required. If sensitive species or habitats, including wetlands are documented on the project
site, the project applicant shall comply with the applicable requirements of the regulatory
agencies and shall apply mitigation determined through the agency permitting process.
Action RM-1j: Where feasible, vegetation and tree removal should occur outside of the
bird nesting season (February 1 to August 31). If not feasible, the project applicant shall
retain a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey no more than three days prior
to the commencement of construction activities. The biologist conducting the clearance
survey shall document the negative results if no active bird nests are observed on the project
site or within the vicinity during the clearance survey with a brief letter report, submitted
to the City of San Jacinto Community Development Department prior to construction,
indicating that no impacts to active bird nests would occur before construction can proceed.
If an active avian nest is discovered during the pre-construction clearance survey,
construction activities shall stay outside a 300-foot buffer around the active nest. For listed
and raptor species, this buffer shall be 500 feet. A biological monitor shall be present to
delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest to ensure the
nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activity, pursuant to the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Prior to the commencement of construction activities
Findings
Page 214 of 266
and the issuance of any permits, results of the pre-construction survey and any subsequent
monitoring shall be provided to the City of San Jacinto Community Development
Department, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and other appropriate
agencies.
2. Riparian Habitat
Threshold: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or
US Fish and Wildlife Service?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact BIO-2, pages 5.4-28
through 5.4-31)
Explanation: The Study Area contains numerous aquatic habitats that qualify as sensitive
habitat. Subsequent development under the proposed General Plan Update
could result in impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community. This is considered a potentially significant impact.
Potential impacts would need to be assessed on a project-specific basis once
site-specific development is proposed. Under the MSHCP, any proposed
Project would require an assessment for impacts to riparian habitat to
determine the presence/absence of such habitat and the measures necessary
to mitigate potential direct and indirect impacts associated with the specific
development. The General Plan Update Resource Management Element
also includes policies and actions intended to protect sensitive natural
communities, including riparian habitat, from adverse effects associated
with future development and improvement projects within the Study Area.
Policy RM-1.1 supports a balanced and integrated open space system that
reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity. Policy RM-1.3 preserves
and enhances biological communities that contribute to the region’s
biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive, rare, or endangered plant and
wildlife species in accordance with State and federal resource agency
requirements. Policy RM-1.4 addresses regional cooperation by
recognizing areas of overlapping jurisdiction with respect to open space and
biological resources, such as the MSHCP, and coordinating the City’s
actions with efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County
to protect and maximize regional open space. Policy RM-1.6 would
conserve existing native vegetation where possible and integrate regionally
native plant species into development and infrastructure projects where
appropriate. Action RM-1c directs the City to work closely with the
USACE, USFWS, and the CDFW during the discretionary project
permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result in the alteration
of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian
habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive
Findings
Page 215 of 266
biological resources. Action RM-1d directs the City to cooperate with the
County to develop and manage preserve areas within the urban landscape.
During the review of development proposals, the City would use the
MSHCP (particularly Section 3.2.13 San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help
assess potential project impacts and mitigation requirements. Development
in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable terms of the
MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees,
narrow endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable
surveys. Projects located within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through
the MSHCP Joint Project Review as appropriate. Further, Action RM-1i
addresses potential resources outside of the MSHCP area to ensure they are
identified and addressed as part of the development review process. Action
RM-1j would ensure that vegetation and tree removal occurring during the
nesting bird season conduct surveys prior to the commencement of
construction activities and to provide for buffers if active nests are
confirmed. Policy RM-2.4 encourages development that avoids impacts to
watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and
creeks, retaining these resources in their natural condition if feasible. Action
RM-2b directs the City to cooperate with the RWQCB to develop a plan to
assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface
waters. Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants
and wildlife within the planning area as well as downstream. Future
development projects would be required to comply with the General Plan
Update and adopted federal, State, and local regulations for the protection
of sensitive natural communities, including riparian habitat. Although
numerous regulations including implementation of the MSHCP and General
Plan Update policies and actions would minimize impacts to sensitive
riparian habitat, at a program level of review, it cannot be ensured that all
impacts could be reduced to less than significant at the site-specific level.
Therefore, potential impacts to riparian habitat and other sensitive natural
communities would be considered significant and unavoidable.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-1: Natural Resources. A community that conserves and protects its natural
resources.
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.3: Biological Resource Protection. Preserve and enhance biological
communities that contribute to the region’s biodiversity, with a special focus on sensitive,
rare, or endangered plant and wildlife species in accordance with state and federal resource
agency requirements.
Findings
Page 216 of 266
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Policy RM-1.6: Native Vegetation. Conserve existing native vegetation where possible
and integrate regionally native plant species into development and infrastructure projects
where appropriate.
Action RM-1c: Work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG)
during the discretionary project permitting and CEQA review of any project that may result
in the alteration of a stream bed, involve the removal of vegetation in wetland and riparian
habitats, disturb Waters of the United States or otherwise impact sensitive biological
resources.
Action RM-1d: Cooperate with the County of Riverside to develop and manage preserve
areas within the urban landscape. During the review of development proposals, use the
Western Riverside County MSHCP Habitat Conservation Plan (particularly Section 3.2.13
San Jacinto Valley Area Plan) to help assess potential project impacts and mitigation
requirements. Development in the City shall be required to comply with the applicable
terms of the MSHCP including, but not limited to, the payment of mitigation fees, narrow
endemic surveys, riparian/riverine policy, and other applicable surveys. Projects located
within criteria cell areas shall be reviewed through the MSHCP Joint Project Review as
appropriate.
Action RM-1i: During the development review process, require Applicants of
developments with the potential to reduce or eliminate habitat for native plant and wildlife
species or sensitive habitats not covered by the MSHCP, as determined by the City of San
Jacinto’s Community Development Department, to prepare a site-specific general
biological resources survey to identify the presence of any sensitive biological resources,
including any sensitive plant or wildlife species. The report shall identify the need for
focused presence/absence surveys and identify the presence of state or federal regulated
wetlands or waters. Required surveys shall be conducted by qualified biologists and/or
botanists in accordance with California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and/or
United States Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) survey protocols for target species. If
no sensitive species are observed during the field survey then no further mitigation will be
required. If sensitive species or habitats, including wetlands are documented on the project
site, the project applicant shall comply with the applicable requirements of the regulatory
agencies and shall apply mitigation determined through the agency permitting process.
Action RM-1j: Where feasible, vegetation and tree removal should occur outside of the
bird nesting season (February 1 to August 31). If not feasible, the project applicant shall
retain a qualified biologist to conduct a nesting bird survey no more than three days prior
to the commencement of construction activities. The biologist conducting the clearance
survey shall document the negative results if no active bird nests are observed on the project
Findings
Page 217 of 266
site or within the vicinity during the clearance survey with a brief letter report, submitted
to the City of San Jacinto Community Development Department prior to construction,
indicating that no impacts to active bird nests would occur before construction can proceed.
If an active avian nest is discovered during the pre-construction clearance survey,
construction activities shall stay outside a 300-foot buffer around the active nest. For listed
and raptor species, this buffer shall be 500 feet. A biological monitor shall be present to
delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest to ensure the
nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activity, pursuant to the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Prior to the commencement of construction activities
and the issuance of any permits, results of the pre-construction survey and any subsequent
monitoring shall be provided to the City of San Jacinto Community Development
Department, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and other appropriate
agencies.
Policy RM-2.4: Natural Conditions. Encourage development that avoids impacts to
watershed areas, wetlands, natural drainage channels, riparian areas, and creeks, retaining
these resources in their natural condition if feasible.
Action RM-2b: Cooperate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a
plan to assist agricultural operations to reduce nitrate and sediment input to surface waters.
Such a plan will enhance water quality and benefit aquatic plants and wildlife within the
planning area as well as downstream.
D. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
1. Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Threshold: Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact GHG-1, pages 5.8-18
through 5.8-37)
Explanation: Implementation of the proposed Project would contribute to increases of
GHG emissions that are associated with global climate change. Estimated
GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily
associated with increases of CO2 and other GHG pollutants, such as
methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), from mobile sources and utility
usage. WRCOG has developed a subregional CAP with the participation of
the City of San Jacinto, as well as other jurisdictions in the subregion, to
achieve local GHG emissions levels that would be consistent with the
Statewide reduction targets established by AB 32, SB 32, and CARB’s 2017
Scoping Plan. Additionally, the City of San Jacinto has set a target to reduce
community-wide emissions to 1.83 MTCO2e per service population (SP) by
the year 2030, consistent with the method used to establish the WRCOG
Subregion’s 2030 target, as described in the WRCOG Subregional CAP, to
achieve the target of 40 percent below 1990 GHG emission levels by 2030
Findings
Page 218 of 266
as encapsulated by SB 32. This equates to total annual emissions target of
147,932 MTCO2e per year by the year 2030, based on the City’s population
and jobs forecasts. The City also set a longer-range goal of 0.62 MTCO2e
per SP by 2050, consistent with the State’s goal to achieve 80 percent below
1990 levels by 2050. Reductions associated with the City’s waste diversion
efforts are accounted for by State measure SR-1 (Recycling and Waste
Diversion Mandates), while reductions resulting from local water
conservation and reuse are accounted for by State Measure SW -1 (Water
Conservation Mandates). The City is also supporting statewide efforts to
reduce emissions from agriculture through its support for local farms and
community gardens. These measures implemented together result in an
estimated 191,700 MTCO2e in community emissions for 2030, or 3.3
MTCO2e per capita, which is an approximate 6 percent reduction compared
to the 2017 levels, but above the 2030 target of 147,932 MTCO2e by 43,768
MTCO2e. The City also set a longer-range goal of 0.62 MTCO2e per SP by
2050, consistent with the State’s goal to achieve 80 percent below 1990
levels by 2050. The reduction of GHG emissions puts the City on the path
to achieve its 2050 emissions targets. However, the City would need
additional actions to keep the City on a path that aligns with the State of
California’s longer-term goal for 2050.
The General Plan Update would not conflict with the implementation of the
CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan. General Plan Update policies and actions that
support the implementation of the Scoping Plan would improve air quality,
reduce GHG emissions, encourage alternative modes of transportation, such
as walking, biking, and public transportation, and divert waste from
landfills. Specifically, the proposed General Plan Update Land Use Element
includes Policy LU-1.1 which promotes a land use plan that supports
efficient development and multiple transportation options. Policy LU-2.2
encourages new development to occur in infill locations that reduces
sprawl, preserves open space, and creates convenient connections to other
land uses and activity centers. Proposed Economic Development Element
Policy ED-3.1 encourages higher density housing and higher intensity
employment space to locate in mixed-use formats along the City’s
commercial corridors, near transit nodes, and in areas well-served by the
City’s multimodal transportation network. The General Plan Update
Resources Management Element includes Policy RM-4.3 to align the City’s
local GHG reduction targets with the statewide GHG reduction targets of
AB 32, and aligns the City’s GHG reduction goal with the statewide GHG
reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. Policy RM-4.5 encourages
pedestrian-scale development and pedestrian-friendly design features to
reduce vehicle emissions. Policy RM-4.9 establishes the City’s per capita
GHG reduction targets for 2030 and 2050. Policy RM-4.10 encourages the
adoption of local policies and programs consistent with the local measures
identified in the WRCOG Subregional CAP for the City to reduce GHG
emissions. Policy RM-4.11 expands the number of parks and trees in the
Findings
Page 219 of 266
City to provide a larger carbon sink. The proposed Mobility Element
includes goals and policies to encourage the reduction of VMT to lower
GHG emissions. This includes Goal M-3, which supports a multi-modal
transportation network that provides sufficient vehicular, pedestrian, bike
and transit facilities. Policy M-3.2 incorporates facilities and design features
into transportation improvement projects that support the use of public
transit and active transportation. Policy M-3.3 links commercial
development, employment centers, public facilities, and community parks
and open spaces to transit and active transportation facilities and trails,
wherever feasible. Overall, General Plan Update impacts related to
consistency with the 2017 Scoping Plan would be less than significant. The
General Plan Update would also not conflict with the implementation of
2022 Scoping Plan and its future programs.
The proposed Project does not conflict with the implementation of the 2017
Scoping Plan; however, the Project does not meet the 2030 community
emissions target and would therefore have a significant and unavoidable
impact. WRCOG recommends additional reduction measures in the City’s
CAP, including encouraging residents and businesses to enroll in SCE’s
Green Rate program (currently offering 50 percent and 100 percent
renewable options), and adopting a local building code beyond Title 24 that
incentivizes electrification or limits the use of fossil natural gas in new
buildings and major retrofits. The General Plan Update Resource
Management Element Action RM-5j encourages SCE customers to
participate in SCE’s 100% Green Tier. The City is not planning on adopting
the additional measure recommended in the WRCOG Subregional CAP for
the City to adopt a local building code beyond Title 24, since the measure
is not feasible and conflicts with the other objectives of the General Plan
Update, specifically to “attract and retain businesses and industries that
provide jobs for local residents”, and would potentially discourage future
development envisioned in the General Plan Update. The City will continue
to participate in the regional efforts of the CAP and implement feasible
measures, as specified in the General Plan Update Resource Management
Element Policy RM-4.10 and Action RM-4a, which commits the City to
continue participating with WRCOG’s Subregional CAP updates.
In order to further reduce GHG emissions associated with buildout of the
General Plan Update, the City has included numerous policies and actions
aimed at reducing GHG emissions and promoting sustainability in San
Jacinto. The General Plan Update proposes policies and actions that are
specifically relevant to climate change and GHG emissions and energy
consumption within the Study Area. Specifically, the General Plan Update
Resources Management Element includes Policy RM-4.1, which supports
regional efforts, including those organized through the SCAQMD, SCAG,
the WRCOG, and CARB to implement the regional AQMP. Policy RM-4.3
aligns the City’s local GHG reduction targets with the statewide GHG
Findings
Page 220 of 266
reduction targets of AB 32, and aligns the City’s GHG reduction goal with
the statewide GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. Policy RM-
49 establishes the per capita GHG reduction targets to meet the
requirements established by the state under AB 32 and SB 32, consistent
with the CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan. Policy RM-4.11 expands the number
of parks and trees in San Jacinto to provide a larger carbon sink or area
containing natural sources that retain more carbon than what those sources
emit. Action RM-4a implements the local GHG reduction measures
identified in the WRCOG’s Subregional CAP for San Jacinto, directs the
City to participate in future updates of the CAP, and on an annual basis
record the status of each local measure and submit the results to WRCOG
using the WRCOG Climate Action Plan Tracking Tool. Action RM-5e
provides for the continue review of development projects to ensure that all
new public and private development complies with Title 24 energy
standards, as well as the energy efficiency standards established by the
General Plan Update and the Municipal code.
Numerous policies and programs in the General Plan Update address
sustainable development, which influence operational mobile, energy, and
area-source emissions in the Study Area. Resource Management Element
Policy RM-4.6 encourages and incentivizes higher density and mixed-use
development opportunities within designated areas of the City to lessen the
impacts of traffic congestion on local air quality. Additional policies and
actions throughout the Land Use and Mobility Elements promote reductions
in VMT through the mix and density of land uses, walkable neighborhood
design, bicycle facilities and infrastructure, the expansion of trail networks,
and public transportation facilities and infrastructure. Specifically, the
proposed Land Use Element includes Policy LU-1.1 which promotes an
appropriate land use plan that promotes efficient development and multiple
transportation options. Policy LU-2.2 encourages new development to
occur in infill locations to reduce sprawl, preserve open space, and create
convenient connections to other land uses and activity centers. Policy LU-
4.4 supports pedestrian-friendly and pedestrian-scaled development that
encourages more social interaction and less automobile use, especially in
the Downtown Village. The proposed Mobility Element contains Policy M-
2.4 which promotes public transportation programs that effectively serve
the City’s residents and workers by connecting users to local and regional
destinations, including jobs, recreation, retail and other activity centers.
Policy M-3.2 incorporates facilities and design features into transportation
improvement projects that support the use of public transit and active
transportation. Policy M-3.3 links commercial development, employment
centers, public facilities, and community parks and open spaces to transit
and active transportation facilities and trails, wherever feasible. Mobility
Element Policy M-4.3 encourages the use of open space and utility
easements for bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian trails. Policy M-6.2
encourages the creation and implementation of TDM and congestion
Findings
Page 221 of 266
management mitigation measures in areas experiencing high levels of
congestion and VMT levels. Additionally, Policy M-6.4 promotes working
with developers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and minimize
congestion related to new development through improvements to the
circulation system and on-site improvements that encourage non-vehicular
modes of travel. Additionally, policies in the Resource Management
Element promote conservation of open space. Policy RM-1.1 supports a
balanced and integrated open space system that reflects a variety of
considerations, including resource conservation, recreation, aesthetics, and
community identity. While these policies and actions would further assist
the City is reducing GHG emissions, the associated reduction of GHG
emissions are not quantifiable. Because of this, the City cannot state with
certainty whether implementation of the General Plan Update would meet
the 2030 and 2050 community emissions targets.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Pattern. Promote an appropriate land use plan that fosters and
enhances community livability and public health; sustains economic vitality; promotes
efficient development and multiple transportation options; reduces pollution, greenhouse
gas emissions, and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and ensures
compatibility between uses consistent with the land use designations identified in this
Element and Land Use Map (LU-2).
Policy LU-2.2: Infill Development. Encourage new development to occur in infill
locations in a balanced and efficient pattern that reduces sprawl, preserves open space, and
creates convenient connections to other land uses and activity centers.
Policy LU-4.4: Pedestrian Design. Support pedestrian-friendly and pedestrian-scaled
development that encourages more social interaction and less automobile use, especially
in the Downtown Village.
Policy LU-5.5: Sustainable Design. Support “green” and “sustainable” developments that
respect and conserve the region’s important resources.
MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.1: Balanced Circulation System: Provide for a balanced circulation system
that promotes the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City.
Policy M-1.2: Access and Mobility: Strive to maintain sufficient access and mobility for
all modes of travel and users of the roadway network.
Policy M-1.5: Transportation Improvements for All Users: Encourage roadway,
sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway
Findings
Page 222 of 266
system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety.
Action M-1a: Periodically review and assess the vehicular operating conditions along City
facilities to determine what, if any, improvements are warranted to maintain a safe and
efficient flow of traffic in the City. Improvements may be identified and included in the
City’s Capital Improvement Plan and/or required as part of project approval through the
development review process.
Policy M-2.4: Public Transit: Promote public transportation programs that effectively
serve the City’s residents and workers by connecting users to local and regional
destinations, including jobs, recreation, retail, and other activity centers.
Goal M-3: Complete Streets. A multi-modal transportation network that provides
sufficient vehicular, pedestrian, bike and transit facilities.
Policy M-3.1: Complete Streets: Apply context-sensitive complete streets principles to
new roadways and to transportation improvements to serve all modes of travel and users
of all ages and abilities.
Policy M-3.2: Multimodal Facilities: Incorporate facilities and design features into
transportation improvement projects that support the use of public transit and active
transportation.
Policy M-3.3: Multimodal Connectivity: Link commercial development, employment
centers, public facilities, and community parks and open spaces to t ransit and active
transportation facilities and trails, wherever feasible.
Policy M-3.6: Park and Ride Facilities: Encourage the provision of regional public
transportation services and support facilities such as park and ride lots.
Goal M-4: Active Transportation. An extensive and regionally linked network of trails,
bicycle lanes, and sidewalk paths that encourage active transportation as viable for
transportation and recreation.
Policy M-4.1: Trails Master Plan: Implement applicable goals, policies, and projects
from the Trails Master Plan to provide trails and multimodal facilities that support active
transportation within and beyond the City.
Policy M-4.2: Active Transportation Network: Provide and maintain an extensive active
transportation and trail network that supports bicycles, pedestrians, and equestrians and is
linked to regional facilities and facilities of adjacent jurisdictions.
Policy M-4.3: Trail Development: Encourage the use of open space and utility easements
for bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian trails, where feasible.
Policy M-4.4: Trail Connectivity: Encourage Specific Plans and Planned Developments
to include well-developed and designed trails that connect neighborhoods to parks, schools,
jobs, and adjacent existing or planned local and/or regional trails.
Findings
Page 223 of 266
Policy M-4.5: Support Facilities: Encourage new developments to provide bicycle
parking, lockers, and other support facilities for bicyclists.
Goal M-6: Transportation Management. Transportation management strategies that
comply with the County Congestion Management Plan and regional and statewide
greenhouse gas emissions targets.
Policy M-6.1: Vehicle Miles Traveled: Maintain vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
thresholds and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) mitigation requirements for
the purpose of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA).
Policy M-6.2: Transportation Demand Management: Create and implement TDM and
congestion management mitigation measures in areas experiencing high levels of
congestion and VMT levels.
Policy M-6.4: New Development: Work with developers to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and minimize congestion related to new development through improvements to
the circulation system and on-site improvements that encourage non-vehicular modes of
transportation.
Action M-6c: Require developments that are approved based on TDM plans to incorporate
monitoring and enforcement of TDM targets as part of those plans.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Policy PS-7.5: Energy Supply. Promote plans and programs that increase sustainable
energy sources.
Policy PS-7.11: Greenhouse Gas Reductions. Reduce communitywide greenhouse gas
emissions locally by actively supporting regional efforts to reduce greenhouse gases
throughout the county.
Action PS-7b: Expand the use of energy-efficient lighting, such as LEDs, for City-owned
light facilities.
Action PS-7c: Consider purchasing only electric or alternative-energy vehicles for the City
vehicle fleet, as appropriate, based on the intended use of the vehicle.
Action PS-7d: Evaluate the feasibility for government-constructed and/or -operated new
development to exceed the CalGreen Tier 1, or successor program, standards.
Action PS-7e: Promote the use of sustainable and carbon-neutral energy sources in new
development.
Action PS-7f: Explore using renewable energy and clean generation technologies such as
solar, wind, biogas, or fuel cells to power City facilities where appropriate.
Findings
Page 224 of 266
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.1: Balanced Open Space System. Support a balanced and integrated open
space system that reflects a variety of considerations, including resource conservation,
recreation, aesthetics, and community identity.
Policy RM-1.4: Regional Cooperation. Recognize areas of overlapping jurisdiction with
respect to open space and biological resources, such as the County of Riverside Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and coordinate the City’s actions with
efforts of surrounding cities, agencies, and Riverside County to protect and maximize
regional open space.
Action RM-1e: For Hillside Development Projects, implement the City’s Hillside
Development Standards to retain the significant hillsides and ridgelines on San Jacinto’s
eastern and western borders as Open Space, allowing areas of non-intensive development
on the more gently sloped areas at the base of the eastern and western hillsides.
Goal RM-4: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Improved air quality in San
Jacinto and the region through reductions in air pollutants and greenhouse gas (GHG
emissions).
Policy RM-4.1: Regional Cooperation. Support regional efforts, including those
organized through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern California
Association of Governments, the Western Riverside Council of Governments, and the
California Air Resource Board (CARB) to implement the regional Air Quality
Management Plan.
Policy RM-4.2: Measurement and Enforcement. Coordinate with the California Air
Resources Board and South Coast Air Quality Management District to properly measure
air quality at emission sources and enforce the standards of the Clean Air Act.
Policy RM-4.4: Transportation Options. Promote alternative modes of transportation to
reduce vehicular emissions and improve air quality. (See Mobility Element)
Policy RM-4.5: Walkability. Encourage pedestrian-scale development and pedestrian-
friendly design features to reduce vehicle emissions. (See Mobility Element)
Policy RM-4.6: Sustainable Development. Encourage and incentivize higher density and
mixed-use development opportunities within designated areas of the City to lessen the
impacts of traffic congestion on local air quality. (See Land Use Element)
Policy RM-4.7: Sensitive Receptors. Insulate sensitive receptors from areas of heightened
air quality pollution, by utilizing land use planning to buffer and protect residential areas.
Policy RM-4.8: Mitigation. Require the implementation of relevant mitigation measures
for all future development upon identification of potential air quality impacts.
Policy RM-4.12: Public Engagement. Promote regional air quality programs in order to
Findings
Page 225 of 266
inform the public on regional air quality concerns and encourage the engagement of all San
Jacinto residents in future planning decisions related to air quality.
Action RM-4b: Review all new industrial and commercial development projects for
potential air quality impacts to residences and other sensitive receptors. Ensure that
mitigation measures and best management practices are implemented to reduce significant
emissions of criteria pollutants.
Action RM-4c: Review development, infrastructure, and planning projects for consistency
with SCAQMD requirements during the CEQA review process. Require project applicants
to prepare air quality analyses to address SCAQMD and General Plan requirements, which
include analysis and identification of:
1. Air pollutant emissions associated with the project during construction, project
operation, and cumulative conditions.
2. Potential exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants.
3. Significant air quality impacts associated with the project for construction, project
operation, and cumulative conditions.
4. Mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts to less than significant or the
maximum extent feasible where impacts cannot be mitigated to less than
significant.
Action RM-4d: Work with the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern
California Association of Governments, the Western Riverside Council of Governments,
and the California Air Resource Board (CARB) to implement programs aimed at
improving regional air quality.
Action RM-4g: Provide the necessary facilities and infrastructure to facilitate the use of
City-owned low or zero-emission vehicles such as electric vehicle charging facilities at key
City facilities as operations necessitate and/or as funding becomes available.
Action RM-4k: Support the establishment and expansion of a regional network of electric
vehicle charging stations and encourage the expanded use of electric vehicles.
Action RM-4l: Establish and adopt standards and requirements for electric vehicle
parking, including minimum requirements for the installation of electric vehicle charging
stations in new multi-family residential and commercial, office, and light industrial
development.
Action RM-4n: Future development projects implemented under the General Plan will be
required to demonstrate consistency with SCAQMD construction emission thresholds.
Where emissions from individual projects exceed SCAQMD thresholds, the following
actions shall be incorporated as necessary to minimize impacts. These measures do not
exclude the use of other, equally effective mitigation measures.
Findings
Page 226 of 266
Require all off-road diesel equipment greater than 50 horsepower (hp) used for this
Project to meet USEPA Tier 4 final off-road emission standards or equivalent. Such
equipment shall be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT)
devices including a California Air Resources Board Certified Level 3 Diesel
Particulate Filter (DPF) or equivalent. The DPF reduces diesel particulate matter
and NOx emissions during construction activities.
Require a minimum of 50 percent of construction debris be diverted for recycling.
Require building materials to contain a minimum 10 percent recycled content.
Require materials such as paints, primers, sealants, coatings, and glues to have a
low volatile organic compound concentration compared to conventional products.
If low VOC materials are not available, architectural coating phasing should be
extended sufficiently to reduce the daily emissions of VOCs.
Action RM-4o: Future development projects will be required to demonstrate consistency
with SCAQMD’s operational emission thresholds. For projects where operational
emissions exceed regulatory thresholds, the following measu res may be used to reduce
impacts. Note the following measures are not all inclusive and developers have the option
to add or substitute measures that are equally or more appropriate for the scope of the
project.
Develop a project specific TDM program for residents and/or employees that
provides opportunities for carpool/vanpools.
Provide onsite solar/renewable energy in excess of regulatory requirements.
Require that owners/tenants of non-residential or multi-family residential
developments use architectural coatings that are 10 grams per liter or less when
repainting/repairing properties.
Require dripless irrigation and irrigation sensor units that prevent watering during
rain storms.
Ensure all parking areas are wired for capability of future EV charging and include
EV charging stations that exceed regulatory requirements.
Goal RM-5: Energy and Mineral Resources. A community that safely manages its
energy and mineral resources
Policy RM-5.1: San Jacinto Power. Continue to make clean, modern, and cost-effective
energy options available to individuals who live and work in San Jacinto.
Policy RM-5.2: Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with all state requirements
regarding the generation of power and encourage energy providers to investigate the use
or expansion of renewable sources of energy.
Findings
Page 227 of 266
Policy RM-5.3: Renewable Energy. Promote the development and use of renewable
energy resources to reduce dependency on fossil fuels.
Policy RM-5.4: Energy-Efficient Materials. Promote the use of energy-efficient
materials, equipment, and design in public and private facilities and infrastructure.
Policy RM-5.5: Energy Conservation. Promote energy conservation and recycling by the
public and private sectors.
Policy RM-5.6: Energy Needs. Collaborate with local service providers in determining
and meeting the needs of the community for energy in clean, modern, and cost-effective
ways.
Policy RM-5.7: Business Community. Support the decisions of the San Jacinto business
community as they select and implement the most appropriate, financially feasible, and
responsible energy source for their individual operations.
Policy RM-5.8: Public Education. Promote public education programs that advocate for
reducing energy consumption, and promote renewable sources of energy.
Policy RM-5.9: Promote Energy Conservation in Existing Building Stock. Promote
energy conservation by residents and businesses in existing structures, in close
coordination with other agencies and local energy providers, including the SCAQMD and
Southern California Edison.
Action RM-5a: Continue to implement the City’s Community Choice Aggregation (CCA)
program; evaluate the effectiveness of the program every five years to identify
programmatic changes necessary to continue meeting the City’s objectives.
Action RM-5b: Implement energy conservation measures in public buildings through the
following actions:
Promote energy efficient buildings and site design for all new public buildings
during the site development permit process; and
Install energy saving devices in new public buildings and retrofit existing public
buildings.
Action RM-5c: During the development review process, encourage innovative building
design, layout, and orientation techniques to minimize energy use by taking advantage of
sun/shade patterns, prevailing winds, landscaping and building materials that control
energy usage, and solar design.
Action RM-5d: Promote retrofit programs by the City to reduce energy usage and
consequently reduce emissions from energy consumption. Encourage utility companies to
provide informational literature about available retrofit programs at public facilities such
as City Hall, the Community Center , and libraries.
Findings
Page 228 of 266
Action RM-5e: Continue to review development projects to ensure that all new public and
private development complies with the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 standards
as well as the energy efficiency standards established by the General Plan and the
Municipal Code.
Action RM-5f: Promote the CEC Building Energy Benchmarking Program (AB 802) on
the City’s website to help benchmark and monitor energy use for participating businesses
seeking to increase energy efficiency and realize cost savings.
Action RM-5g: Encourage new development projects to install electrified space (HVAC)
and water heating systems in lieu of natural gas systems, above and beyond the
requirements of Title 24, before and during the building plan check process.
Action RM-5h: During the development review process, require that all new
developments adjacent to or near natural gas lines, coordinate with So Cal Gas to install
and connect to the lines, as feasible.
Action RM-5i: Advertise the San Jacinto Power PureGreen program and encourage San
Jacinto Power customers to enroll in the program and opt-up to 100 percent renewable
energy content.
Action RM-5j: Encourage Southern California Edison (SCE) customers to participate in
SCE’s 100% Green tier.
Policy RM-7.1: Regional Cooperation. Collaborate with the Valley-Wide Recreation and
Park District and other organizations to provide parks, recreational, and open space
facilities that meet the needs and preferences of all segments of the community.
Policy RM-7.9: Open Space in Nonresidential Development. Encourage outdoor
gathering spaces, such as mini-parks and plazas, be incorporated into nonresidential
development to encourage social interaction, create experience-oriented centers, and
enhance the visual character of the community.
Policy RM-7.10: Parkland Funding. Actively pursue financing for parkland acquisition
and maintenance, and allocate sufficient funding to park development to support the
community’s recreational needs.
Action RM-7a: Review development proposals for their potential demand for and impact
on parks and recreational facilities in the community by:
Requiring developers of residential projects to provide adequate parkland equal to
five acres per 1,000 residents (0.005 acre per resident), or pay an in-lieu fee prior
to occupancy of the project.
Requiring non-residential development to provide parkland equal to 2.5 acres per
1,000 employees (0.0025 acre per employee), or pay an in lieu fee prior to
occupancy of the project.
Findings
Page 229 of 266
Work with developers to identify the appropriate park type(s), size(s), facilities, and
location(s) for required park facilities.
Ensure parkland facilities conform with City standards.
Policy RM-10.1: Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with local, regional and
State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting.
Policy RM-10.2: Solid Waste Collection. Provide adequate waste disposal, recycling, and
refuse services for present and future residents and businesses, including programs that
improve public access to solid waste collection and recycling facilities.
Policy RM-10.4: Source Reduction and Recycling Efforts. Participate in source
reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and
ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region
Policy RM-10.5: Organic Waste. Work with appropriate service providers to collect and
compost greenwaste, including landscaping, Christmas trees, composting and mulch, and
other sources of organic waste, to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal
areas.
Policy RM-10.6: Fees and Funding. Work with appropriate service providers to
periodically review collection, recycling, and disposal fees to achieve state and federal
mandates, meet community expectations, and reflect cost efficiencies or increases for
service delivery.
Policy RM-10.7: Public Education. Promote citywide educational programs to inform
citizens of the benefits of recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations.
Action RM-10a: On an ongoing basis and in compliance with State law, ensure solid waste
collection activities completed by franchise solid waste haulers, facility siting and
construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and
recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are
consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan.
Action RM-10b: Include standard language in requests for services and in City agreements
requiring contractors to use best management practices to maximize diversion of waste
from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates.
Action RM-10c: Encourage the expansion of recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of
hazardous materials, including the following:
Increased participation in single family and multifamily residential curbside
recycling programs;
Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper,
cardboard, and plastics;
Findings
Page 230 of 266
Reduce yard and landscaping waste through methods such as composting, grass
recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques; and
Encourage local businesses to provide electronic waste (e-waste) drop-off services
and encourage residents and businesses to properly dispose of, or recycle, e-waste.
2. Conflict with Greenhouse Gas Regulations
Threshold: Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact 3.8-6, pages 3.8-26
through 3.8-28)
Explanation: The General Plan Update would not satisfy the GHG reduction
requirements established by SB 32 and AB 32. The GHG reduction targets
developed for the proposed General Plan Update are consistent with the
GHG reduction targets provided in the CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan, which
were developed by the CARB to ensure compliance with AB 32, SB 32, and
consistent with Executive Order S-03-05. The proposed Project does not
conflict with the implementation of the 2017 Scoping Plan; however, the
Project does not meet the 2030 or 2050 community emissions target. The
Project would not reduce emissions to below the community wide
thresholds through buildout of the General Plan Update (i.e. for years 2030
and 2040), which ensures that the proposed Project is consistent with all
GHG reduction targets established for the State. Therefore, the proposed
Project would conflict with the State of California’s GHG reduction goals
and targets. While the General Plan Update policies and actions would
further assist the City in reducing GHG emissions, the associated reduction
of GHG emissions are not quantifiable. Because of this, the City cannot
state with certainty whether implementation of the General Plan Update
would meet the 2030 and 2050 community emissions targets.
At the regional level, the 2020 RTP/SCS is an applicable plan adopted for
the purpose of reducing GHGs. The Project would be consistent with the
2020 RTP/SCS through various polices. The General Plan Update policies
would support development that is encouraged by the RTP/SCS to reduce
VMT and expand multi-modal transportation options in order for the region
to achieve GHG reductions from the land use and transportation sectors
required by SB 375, which, in turn, advances the State’s long-term climate
policies. By furthering implementation of SB 375, the General Plan Update
supports regional land use and transportation GHG reductions consistent
with State regulatory requirements. Therefore, the Project would be
consistent with the GHG reduction-related actions and strategies contained
in the 2020 RTP/SCS. While the proposed Project is consistent with the
CARB 2017 Scoping Plan and the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS, the proposed
Project would not meet the established reduction targets of SB 32, and AB
Findings
Page 231 of 266
32. There would be a significant and unavoidable impact relative to this
topic. The City of San Jacinto will be implementing the additional GHG
reductions strategies shown in the Draft EIR Response GHG-1 in order to
further reduce emissions.
E. NOISE
1. Ambient Noise Levels
Threshold: Would the project result in the generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in
excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact NOI-1, pages 5.13-27
through 5.13-44)
Explanation: Transportation Noise Impacts
The City of San Jacinto is proposing an updated General Plan Land Use
Map and an updated Roadway Classification Map in anticipation of the
expected growth in the City. The primary noise source in the Study Area
would continue to be vehicle traffic. By the year 2040, existing land uses
adjacent to the studied roadways would be exposed to noise levels that
exceed the City’s exterior standards presented in the proposed General Plan
Update Table PS-1. Compared to existing traffic noise levels, future (2040)
traffic volumes are expected to be up to 11.9 dBA CNEL louder than
existing ambient noise levels at existing land uses and would result in
substantial increases in ambient noise along many of the studied road
segments. Implementation of the proposed 2040 General Plan Update Land
Use Plan and Roadway Classifications Map would result in substantial
permanent increases in existing noise levels at existing and future sensitive
receptors.
Implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would result in
significant impacts related to exceedances of the land use compatibility
criteria and substantial increases in ambient noise levels. Where existing
land uses would be impacted, the impact would be significant and
unavoidable as setback distances of existing sensitive receptors are already
established. In order to reduce these impacts, the use of sound walls or quiet
pavements could be employed; however, use of new sound walls, or
modifying sound walls is not considered to be practical or feasible as a
mitigation strategy. Many of the noise impacts could potentially be reduced
through the use of quiet pavement. However, not all of the impacted
roadway segments could be mitigated through use of quiet pavements due
to the magnitude of the traffic noise increases. Additionall y, widespread
repaving of city streets with quiet pavements would be expensive and
Findings
Page 232 of 266
impractical. General Plan Policies PS-6.1 through PS-6.10, and Actions
PS-6a through PS-6i, identified below, are intended to minimize exposure
to excessive noise, including noise associated with traffic. Specifically,
Policies PS-6.1 and PS-6.2 support noise-compatible land uses in the
vicinity of traffic noise sources and require that new development and
infrastructure projects be reviewed for consistency with the noise standards
established in Tables PS-1 and PS-2. The proposed General Plan Update
standards required under Policy PS-6.1, for exposure to traffic noise meet
or exceed the noise level standards shown in General Plan Update Public
Safety Element Tables PS-1 and PS-2. Policy PS-6.2 and Actions PS-6b
would ensure that new development mitigates potential noise impacts
through incorporating the noise control treatments necessary to achieve
acceptable noise levels. Policy PS-6.3 sets criteria for evaluating future
increases in traffic noise levels. Action PS-6a would ensure that the San
Jacinto Municipal Code, including the updated noise ordinance, is
consistent with the noise standards established in the General Plan Update.
Implementation of the proposed policies and actions of the General Plan
Update would reduce noise and land use compatibility impacts from
vehicular traffic noise sources and would ensure that new development is
designed to include noise-attenuating features. However, the traffic noise
increases associated with the proposed General Plan Update exceed the
applicable noise exposure criteria. Therefore, the proposed General Plan
would have a significant and unavoidable impact relative to traffic noise on
existing noise-sensitive uses in the City.
Stationary Noise Sources
Implementation of the General Plan could result in the future development
of land uses that generate noise levels in excess of applicable City noise
standards for non-transportation noise sources. Such land uses may include
commercial area loading docks, industrial uses, HVAC equipment, car
washes, daycare facilities, auto repair, and recreational uses. While the
General Plan does not specifically propose any new noise generating uses,
the Land Use Map includes industrial land use designations, which may
result in new noise sources. Specific development projects and the details
of future noise generating land uses that may be located in the City in the
future are not known at this time. While no specific projects are proposed
under the General Plan Update, changes in land use may allow for more
intensive noise-generating uses in closer proximity to noise-sensitive uses.
Where this occurs, detailed noise studies would be required to ensure that
noise control measures are implemented into the project design. Such
measures could include redesign of industrial buildings away from sensitive
uses, construction of sound walls or berms between noise generating uses
and sensitive uses, using buildings to create additional buffer distance and
screening, or other site design measures to ensure that non-transportation
(stationary) noise sources do not cause exterior noise levels to exceed
Findings
Page 233 of 266
allowable standards at sensitive receptors. The General Plan Update
includes policies and actions that are intended to reduce noise associated
with stationary sources. Specifically, Policies PS-6.1 through PS-6.3 and
PS-6.6 through PS-6.10 and Actions PS-6b, PS-6c and PS-6d would reduce
noise associated with stationary sources. Policy PS-6.2 and Action PS-6b
require new development to mitigate excessive noise to the standards
indicated in Tables PS-1, PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4 through best practices,
including building location and orientation, building design features,
placement of noise-generating equipment away from sensitive receptors,
shielding of noise-generating equipment, placement of noise-tolerant
features between noise sources and sensitive receptors, and use of noise-
minimizing materials. Implementation of the proposed policies and actions
of the General Plan Update would reduce noise impacts from stationary
noise sources to a less than significant level.
Construction Noise and Vibration
Implementation of the proposed General Plan Land Use and Mobility
Elements would result in short-term noise impacts associated with
construction activities, both on- and off-site. Construction crew commute
and the transport of construction equipment and materials to the site for the
proposed project would incrementally increase noise levels on access roads
leading to the site. Short-term construction-related impacts associated with
worker commute and equipment transport on local streets leading to the
project site would result in a less than significant impact on noise-sensitive
receptors along the access routes. No mitigation is required. The site
preparation phase of on-site construction activities, which includes grading
and paving, tends to generate the highest noise levels since the noisiest
construction equipment is earthmoving equipment. Site-specific
construction activities associated with future development is expected to
require the use of scrapers, bulldozers, motor graders, and water and pickup
trucks. Noise reduction potential would be project and site-specific.
Implementation of General Plan Update Public Safety Element Policy PS-
6.7, which requires construction activities to reduce noise impacts on
adjacent uses to comply with the requirements of Chapter 8.40 of the San
Jacinto Municipal Code and Action PS-6e which requires all construction
activity to comply with the limits established in the City’ noise regulation
would result in less than significant construction noise impacts.
General Plan Public Safety Element Table PS-1, Land Use Compatibility
for Community Noise Exposure, presents a land use compatibility chart for
community noise derived from a similar table originally prepared by the
California Office of Noise Control (2017). This table is proposed to be
included in the 2040 General Plan Update Public Safety Element. The table
identifies “normally acceptable,” “conditionally acceptable,” “normally
unacceptable,” and “clearly unacceptable” exterior noise levels for various
Findings
Page 234 of 266
land uses. A “conditionally acceptable” designation implies new
construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed
analysis of the noise reduction requirements for each land use is made and
needed noise insulation features are incorporated in the design. By
comparison, a “normally acceptable” designation indicates that standard
construction can occur with no special noise reduction requirements. While
this land use compatibility chart is based on a 24-hour value, the City is
aware that some land uses are not occupied on a 24-hour basis, and a
descriptor (such as Ldn or CNEL) may be overly restrictive in siting these
types of sensitive land uses. Such uses may include but are not limited to,
schools, libraries, and churches. In these cases, a more appropriate standard
would consider the time of occupancy of the land use. Here, the City
recommends the use of a 65 dBA, 12-hour Leq (Leq(12)) that includes those
hours of actual use. (If a facility is to be used in excess of 12 hours per day,
the CNEL standard should be used.)
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Noise. A comfortable community environment that is free from excessive noise
pollution.
Policy PS-6.1: Noise Exposure. Consider the noise compatibility of existing and future
development when making land use planning decisions. Require development and
infrastructure projects to be consistent with the land use compatibility standards contained
in Tables PS-1, PS-2, PS-3 and PS-4 to ensure acceptable noise exposure levels for existing
and future development.
Policy PS-6.2: Noise Mitigation. Require new development to mitigate excessive noise to
the standards indicated in Tables PS-1, PS-2, PS-3 and PS-4 to the extent feasible through
best practices, including building location and orientation, building design features,
placement of noise-generating equipment away from sensitive receptors, shielding of
noise-generating equipment, placement of noise-tolerant features between noise sources
and sensitive receptors, and use of noise-minimizing materials.
Policy PS-6.3: Acoustical Studies. Require acoustical studies for new discretionary
developments and transportation improvements that have the potential to affect existing
noise-sensitive uses such as schools, hospitals, libraries, care facilities, and residential
areas, and for projects that would introduce new noise-sensitive uses into an area where
existing noise levels may exceed the thresholds identified in this element. For projects that
are required to prepare an acoustical study, the following mobile and stationary noise
source criteria shall be used to determine the significance of those impacts.
A. Mobile Noise Sources:
Where existing traffic noise levels are within or below the “normally acceptable”
Findings
Page 235 of 266
noise criteria at the affected land use (see Table PS-1), a readily perceptible 5 dBA
CNEL or greater increase in roadway noise will be considered significant;
Where existing traffic noise levels falls within the “conditionally acceptable” noise
criteria at the sensitive land use, a +3 dBA CNEL or greater increase in roadway
noise levels will be considered significant; and
Where existing traffic noise levels exceed the “conditionally acceptable” noise
criteria at the sensitive land use, a + 1.5 dBA CNEL or greater increase in roadway
noise levels will be considered significant.
B. Stationary and Non-Transportation Noise Sources
A significant impact will occur if the project results in an exceedance of the noise
level standards contained in this element, or the project will result in an increase in
ambient noise levels by more than 3 dB, whichever is greater.
Policy PS-6.4: Roadway Noise. Encourage nonmotorized transportation alternatives for
local trips and the implementation of noise sensitivity measures in the public realm,
including traffic-calming road design, lateral separation, natural buffers, and setbacks to
decrease excessive motor vehicle noise.
Policy PS-6.5: Vehicular Traffic. Monitor and enforce existing speed limits and motor
vehicle codes requiring adequate mufflers on all types of vehicles traveling through the
city.
Policy PS-6.6: Commercial Noise. Require the use of noise attenuation measures,
including screening and buffering techniques, for all new commercial development
expected to produce excessive noise; in existing cases where the City’s noise standards are
exceeded, work with Code Enforcement to require compliance.
Policy PS-6.7: Construction Noise. Require construction activities to reduce noise
impacts on adjacent uses to the criteria identified in Tables PS-3 and PS-4, or, if the criteria
cannot be met, to the maximum extent feasible complying with Chapter 8.40 of the San
Jacinto Municipal Code (Noise Control) and use best practices. Construction activities
outside of the permitted construction hours identified in the San Jacinto Municipal Code
may be approved on a case-by-case basis by the Community Development Director.
Policy PS-6.8: Temporary Special Events. Temporary special events including, but not
limited to, festivals, concerts, parades, and other similar activities may be allowed to
exceed the noise standards established in this General Plan and the standards established
by Chapter 8.40 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code (Noise Control) through issuance of a
temporary use permit (see Section 17.640 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code (Temporary
Use Permits).
Policy PS-6.9: Temporary Emergency Operations and Emergency Equipment Usage.
Temporary emergency operations or emergency equipment usage is exempt from noise
Findings
Page 236 of 266
standard criteria set by this element.
Policy PS-6.10: Interjurisdictional Coordination. Coordinate with neighboring cities to
minimize noise conflicts between land uses along the City's boundaries.
Action PS-6a: Review Chapter 8.40 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code and update as
necessary to ensure that the noise standards are consistent with this General Plan, including
Tables PS-1, PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4 and to require new residential, mixed-use with a
residential component, and other noise-sensitive development to be designed to minimize
noise exposure to noise sensitive uses through incorporation of site planning and
architectural techniques. The update shall also include noise standards for residential uses
within a mixed-use development, which may differ from other adopted residential noise
standards.
Action PS-6b: Review new development projects for compliance with the noise
requirements established in this General Plan, including the standards established in Tables
PS-1, PS-2, PS-3 and PS-4. Where necessary, require new development to mitigate
excessive noise through best practices, including building location and orientation,
building design features, placement of noise-generating equipment away from sensitive
receptors, shielding of noise-generating equipment, placement of noise-tolerant features
between noise sources and sensitive receptors, and use of noise-minimizing materials such
as rubberized asphalt.
Action PS-6c: Require acoustical studies for all new discretionary projects, including those
related to development and transportation, which have the potential to generate noise
impacts which exceed the standards identified in this General Plan. The studies shall
include representative noise measurements, estimates of existing and projected noise
levels, and mitigation measures necessary to ensure compliance with this element.
Action PS-6d: Review the locations of proposed projects with the potential to generate
stationary noise in relation to sensitive receptors through the discretionary project review
process. Limit delivery or service hours for stores and businesses with loading areas, docks,
or trash bins that front, side, border, or gain access on driveways next to residential and
other noise sensitive areas. Only approve exceptions if full compliance with the nighttime
limits of the noise regulations is achieved.
Action PS-6e: Require all construction activity to comply with the limits (maximum noise
levels, hours and days of allowed activity) established in the City noise regulations (Title
24 California Code of Regulations, Noise Ordinance) in order to reduce impacts associated
with temporary construction noise to the extent feasible. Trucks associated with
construction activities shall follow the designated truck routes described in the Mobility
Element.
Action PS-6f: Actively enforce the standards identified within the City's Noise Ordinance
and Noise Plan in order to reduce impacts to the extent feasible. Update and amend the
Noise Ordinance and Plan as appropriate. Provide a link on the City's website for those to
file complaints against activities and uses that may be violating the Noise Ordinance.
Findings
Page 237 of 266
Action PS-6g: Require new residential projects located adjacent to railroad lines to follow
the FTA vibration screening distance criteria to ensure that residential uses are not exposed
to vibrations exceeding 72 VdB for frequent events (more than 70 events per day), 75 VdB
for occasional events (30-70 events per day), or 80 VdB for infrequent events (less than 30
events per day).
Action PS-6h: Require new development to minimize vibration impacts to adjacent uses
during demolition and construction. Require vibration studies for all new discretionary
projects, including those related to development and transportation, which have the
potential to generate vibration impacts which exceeds the vibration limits. This includes
projects requiring pile driving and/or construction on properties adjacent to historic
structures. For sensitive historic structures, a vibration limit of 0.08 in/sec PPV (peak
particle velocity) will be used to minimize the potential for cosmetic damage to the
building. A vibration limit of 0.30 in/sec PPV will be used to minimize the potential for
cosmetic damage at buildings of normal conventional construction.
Action PS-6i: During subsequent updates to Section 8.40 of the Municipal Code, review
and update Section 8.40.090, Construction Activity Noise Regulations, as needed in order
to allow provisions for emergency repairs, exceptional circumstances, and reasonable
Sunday construction and maintenance activities, while continuing to achieve the objectives
of providing a nuisance-free noise environment.
Findings
Page 238 of 266
SECTION V
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Regarding the General Plan’s potential to result in cumulative impacts, the City hereby
finds as follows:
A. AESTHETICS
Threshold: Would future development associated with implementation of the General
Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable aesthetic and light/glare
impacts?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.1.6, pages 5.1-
19 through 5.1-20)
Explanation: The General Plan Update would support additional development beyond
existing conditions and could increase residential densities and non-
residential land use intensities in specific areas within the Study Area. This
new development may result in changes to the skyline throughout the Study
Area, which may obstruct or interfere with views of surrounding visual
features. Furthermore, 2040 buildout under the proposed General Plan
Update has the potential to result in new and expanded development along
highway corridors with high scenic values, even though these corridors are
not officially designated as State Scenic Highways. Additionally, expanded
development could occur alongside County Eligible Scenic Highways
within the Study Area designated by the Riverside County General Plan.
Regional growth has and will continue to result in a cumulative aesthetic
effect by converting undeveloped land into developed and occupied areas,
and increasing overall levels of nighttime lighting. In general, the General
Plan Update Land Use Element proposes an increase in building density and
intensity, which could increase the number and distribution of dwelling
units and other buildings, as well as supporting infrastructure. This is
considered a potentially significant cumulative impact. Subsequent projects
implemented under the General Plan Update would be required to be
consistent with the General Plan Update policies and actions and adopted
regulations pertaining to aesthetics and lighting in San Jacinto. With
implementation of the adopted policies and regulations described above, the
proposed General Plan Update would not considerably contribute to
permanent changes in visual character, such as obstruction of scenic views,
conversion of existing visual character, and increased lighting resulting in a
substantial degradation. The polices and actions included within the General
Plan Update and compliance with the SJDC would reduce the cumulative
effect of the General Plan Update on visual character to a less-than-
significant level. Therefore, the General Plan Update’s incremental
contribution to aesthetic impacts would be less than cumulatively
considerable.
Findings
Page 239 of 266
B. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to agricultural resources?
Finding: Considerable Contribution and Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR,
Section 5.2.5, page 5.2-12)
Explanation: The City does not have any zoning classifications for forestland, timberland,
or timberland production zones, nor does the Study Area include any
forestland; therefore, the General Plan Update would not contribute to a
significant impact relative to forestland, timberland or timberland
production zones. There are approximately 3,309 acres of Important
Farmlands located within the Study Area, including approximately 413
acres of Prime Farmland, 1,758 acres of Statewide Importance, and 1,138
acres of Unique Farmland. As shown on the General Plan Update Land Use
Map, all of the land within the Study Area is planned for urban
development, with the exception of areas designated as Open Space, Park,
or Water. While some agricultural uses would continue to operate, future
development associated with the implementation of the General Plan
Update and changes in the economy would likely result in the conversion
of many of these areas for urban uses, including lands under a Williamson
Act contract. Further, it is assumed that as development occurs, the
agricultural viability of lands within the Study Area would be reduced. The
General Plan Update includes policies and actions that support the
continuance of agricultural activities within the Study Area. Although the
General Plan Update would not result in the direct conversion of designated
Important Farmland or agricultural land under a Williamson Act contract,
the General Plan Update does not require the preservation of agricultural
land. Additionally, any additional mitigation measures, such as the
preservation of designated farmland, are not feasible and conflict with the
other objectives of the General Plan Update, specifically to “proactively
plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible
manner” and “attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs
for local residents”, and would potentially discourage future development
envisioned in the General Plan Update. Therefore, implementation of the
General Plan Update could result in the permanent loss of agricultural
resources within the Study Area, resulting in a significant unavoidable
cumulative impact.
C. AIR QUALITY
Threshold: Would development of the General Plan Update and related projects result
in cumulatively considerable inconsistencies with the applicable air quality
plan?
Findings
Page 240 of 266
Finding: Considerable Contribution and Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR,
Section 5.3.6, pages 5.3-42 through 5.3-43)
Explanation: Construction of the growth anticipated by the General Plan Update has the
potential to temporarily emit criteria air pollutant emissions through the use
of heavy-duty construction equipment, and through vehicle trips generated
by workers and haul trucks. In addition, fugitive dust emissions would result
from demolition and various soil-handling activities. Mobile source
emissions, primarily NOx and PM emissions (i.e., PM10 and PM2.5), would
result from the use of diesel-powered on- and off-road vehicles and
equipment. Construction emissions can vary substantially from day-to-day,
depending on the level of activity and the specific type of construction
activity. As shown in Table 5.3-4 in Section 5.3 of the Draft EIR,
construction-related daily emissions would exceed the SCAQMD
significance thresholds for VOCs. Additionally, as shown in Table 5.3-5 in
Section 5.3 of the Draft EIR, potential operational emissions for the
proposed Project would also exceed regulatory thresholds (for VOC, NOx,
CO, PM10, and PM2.5). Feasible mitigation measures are incorporated into
the policies and actions included within the General Plan Update. However,
there are no feasible criteria air pollutant reduction measures beyond those
identified within the policies and actions identified, that would reduce
impacts. While implementation of these policies and actions would reduce
criteria pollutant emissions, the extent to which the impacts would be
generated by future development and infrastructure projects have to be
determined on a project-by-project basis, as necessary.
Moreover, with respect to local air quality emissions, toxic air contaminant
emissions, and health impacts, future development under the General Plan
Update would be required to comply with AQMP, SIP, CARB, SCAQMD
regulations, Title 24 energy efficiency standards, and the proposed General
Plan Update policies and actions. Implementation of the policies and actions
listed above would mitigate and reduce such emissions. However, as there
is no way to determine the extent to which these regulations would be, or
need to be, implemented, it is impossible to determine if potential impacts
would be reduced to below regulatory thresholds because the details and
potential emissions levels of future development projects is not known at
this time, as there are no specific development projects proposed as part of
the General Plan Update. Additionally, there are no feasible mitigation
measures beyond the policies and actions listed above. Therefore, localized
operational impacts, construction and operational health and toxic air
impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.
Lastly, with respect to other emissions, future development under the
General Plan Update would be required to comply with AQMP, SIP,
CARB, SCAQMD regulations, Title 24 energy efficiency standards, and the
proposed General Plan Update policies and actions. However, as there is no
Findings
Page 241 of 266
way to determine the extent to which these regulations would be, or need to
be, implemented, it is impossible to determine if potential impacts would be
reduced to below regulatory thresholds. There are no feasible mitigation
measures except for those listed in above. Based on these impacts, the
General Plan Update would contribute to a cumulative impact with regard
to air quality in the region and within the air basin (i.e. the South Coast Air
Basin) as a whole. Therefore, this impact is considered a cumulatively
considerable and significant and unavoidable impact.
D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to biological resources?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.4.6, pages 5.4-
42 through 5.4-43)
Explanation: Cumulative development anticipated throughout Riverside County would
result in impacts to biological resources, including the permanent loss of
habitat for special status species, corridor fragmentation, direct and indirect
impacts to special status species, and reduction and degradation of sensitive
habitat. Biological resources are a limited resource and the cumulative loss
is considered significant. Subsequent projects implemented under the
General Plan Update would be required to be consistent with the proposed
General Plan policies and actions. The implementation of an individual
project would require site-specific review to determine the presence or
absence of movement corridors, special-status species, and sensitive habitat
on a given project site. If movement corridors, special-status species, or
sensitive habitat are present and disturbance is required, federal and State
laws require measures to reduce, avoid, or compensate for impacts to these
resources. Additionally, the implementation of the Western Riverside
County MSHCP for future implementing projects consistent with the
General Plan Update at a project-specific level would minimize direct,
indirect, and cumulative biological impacts. Compliance with the
provisions of the MSHCP fully mitigate impacts to covered species and
habitats. An impact is not considered cumulatively considerable if a project
is required to implement or fund its fair share of mitigation measures
designed to alleviate a cumulative impact (CEQA Guidelines Section 15130
(a)(3)). Compliance with the MSHCP, as well as the polices and mitigation
measures identified in Section 5.4.3 of the Draft EIR and State and federal
regulations governing biological resources, will result in less than
cumulatively considerable impacts. Therefore, the General Plan Update’s
incremental contribution to this cumulative impact would be less than
cumulatively considerable.
Findings
Page 242 of 266
E. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to cultural resources?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.5.6, pages 5.5-
30 through 5.5-31)
Explanation: Construction of individual development projects allowed under the land use
designations of General Plan Update may result in the discovery and
removal of cultural resources, including historic and archaeological
resources, as well as the inadvertent discovery of human remains. The
General Plan Update policies and actions, as well as federal, State, and local
regulations, would reduce the risk to resources in the region. Adherence to
the General Plan Update policies and actions, and existing federal, State,
and local regulations would avoid and/or minimize a cumulative loss of
these important resources if they are identified during project-specific
surveys or construction activities. Therefore, the General Plan Update’s
incremental contribution to cumulative cultural resource impacts would be
less than cumulatively considerable.
F. ENERGY
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to energy?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.6.6, page 5.6-
14)
Explanation: As future development projects are received and reviewed by the City in
subsequent years, those projects would be reviewed for consistency with the
General Plan Update and all relevant State-level programs and
requirements. All future projects must implement the most current version
of the Title 24 energy efficiency requirements, as required by State law.
Consistency with the General Plan Update and other mandatory State-level
programs would ensure that future project-level contributions to inefficient,
wasteful or unnecessary energy use would be less than significant.
Moreover, buildout of the General Plan Update would not be expected cause
an inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy resources nor conflict
with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or ener gy
efficiency. As a result, the proposed General Plan Update’s incremental
contribution to cumulative energy impacts would be less than cumulatively
considerable.
Findings
Page 243 of 266
G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to geologic resources?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.7.6, pages 5.7-
35 through 5.7-36)
Explanation: Seismic, geologic, and soil conditions within the City of San Jacinto would
vary by location and site-specific suitability for development would not be
uniform. Geologic and seismic hazards would be reduced to less than
significant levels following conformance with the established regulatory
framework (i.e., CBC and Municipal Code requirements). If determined
necessary, project-specific mitigation would be incorporated to reduce
cumulative seismic, geologic, and soil impacts to a less than significant
level. If a specific site were determined to create a significant impact that
could not be feasibly mitigated, the site would not be appropriate for
development. These processes, along with compliance with federal and
State laws, local building codes, and public safety standards, would result
in less than significant cumulative impacts related to potential seismic,
geologic, and soil hazards. As a result, implementation of the General Plan
Update would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts involving
seismic and geologic hazards
H. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and
cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts
related to greenhouse gas emissions?
Finding: Considerable Contribution and Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR,
Section 5.8.6, page 5.8-41)
Explanation: The topic of GHG emissions is inherently a cumulative impact. Though
significance thresholds can be developed by air districts, as well as State
and federal regulatory agencies, these thresholds and their related goals are
ultimately designed to effect change at a global level. As demonstrated in
the analysis in Section 5.8.5 of the Draft EIR, the proposed Project is not
consistent with WRCOG’s plan to reduce GHG emissions below a specific
threshold and would therefore have a significant and unavoidable impact
even with the implementation of General Plan Update goals, policies and
actions.
I. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to hazardous materials?
Findings
Page 244 of 266
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.9.6, page 5.9-
42)
Explanation: Construction of individual development projects allowed under the land use
designations of the General Plan Update may involve the transportation,
use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials, which may involve the use of
equipment that contains hazardous materials (e.g., solvents and fuels or
diesel-fueled equipment), or the transportation of excavated soil and/or
groundwater containing contaminants from areas that are identified as being
contaminated. Furthermore, because of the regional nature of the General
Plan Update, some future land uses could transport or use hazardous
materials within one-quarter mile of a school, or other sensitive receptors
such as hospitals and residences. As with specific projects resulting from
implementation of the General Plan Update, cumulative development
would be required to evaluate individual hazards and hazardous materials
impacts at the project-level. While some cumulative impacts would
potentially occur in the region as individual projects are constructed, the
General Plan Update policies and actions, as well as local, State, and federal
regulations would reduce the risk to people associated with hazards and
hazardous materials in the region. Considering the protection granted by
local, State, and federal agencies and their requirements for the use of
hazardous materials and other potential hazards in the region, as described
above, the overall cumulative impact for hazards impacts would not be
significant. As a result, the General Plan Update’s incremental contribution
to cumulative hazards and hazardous materials impacts would be less than
cumulatively considerable.
J. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and
cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts
related to hydrologic resources?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.10-6, pages
5.10-36 through 5.10-37)
Explanation: The General Plan Update does not propose site-specific development and
would not significantly impact drainage courses and hydrologic flows
throughout the City. Construction of the individual development projects
allowed under the land use designations of the proposed General Plan
Update has the potential to result in construction-related water quality
impacts and operational-related impacts to groundwater recharge, and cause
flooding, erosion, or siltation from the alteration of drainage patterns.
Individual projects would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis to
ensure compliance with the General Plan Update policies and actions, as
well as federal, State, and local regulations to reduce hydrology and water
quality impacts. Subsequent development projects under the General Plan
Findings
Page 245 of 266
Update would result in new impervious surfaces and could reduce rainwater
infiltration and groundwater recharge; however, the General Plan Update
would not appreciably add to the volume of imperious surfaces in the Study
Area. As individual projects are constructed, the General Plan Update
policies and actions, as well as federal, State, and local regulations, would
substantially reduce potential cumulative impacts. Considering the
protection granted by local, State, and federal agencies and their permit and
monitoring requirements, as discussed above, and with implementation of
the policies and actions included within the General Plan Update, the overall
cumulative impact would not be significant. As a result, the General Plan
Update's incremental contribution to cumulative hydrology impacts would
be less than cumulatively considerable.
K. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and
cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts
related to land use and population?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.11.5, pages
5.11-29 through 5.11-30)
Explanation: Development of cumulative projects in the City of San Jacinto would be
required to mitigate land use impacts on a project-by-project basis. Each
project would be evaluated for consistency with the project site’s General
Plan land use designation and zoning, adopted General Plan goals, policies,
and actions, and other applicable regional land use plans, such as SCAG’s
RTP/SCS. As analyzed in Section 5.11.4 of the Draft EIR, the proposed
General Plan Update would result in less than significant impact related to
land use and relevant planning. Therefore, the incremental impact of the
proposed Project, when considered in combination with development
within the City and region, would not result in cumulatively considerable
land use impacts.
The land uses allowed under the proposed General Plan Update provide
opportunities for cohesive new growth at infill locations within existing
urbanized areas, as well as new growth adjacent to existing urbanized areas
within the Study Area, but would not create physical division within
existing communities. New development and redevelopment projects would
be designed to complement the character of existing neighborhoods and
provide connectivity between existing development and new development
within the cumulative analysis area. The proposed General Plan Update
does not include any new roadways, infrastructure, or other features that
would divide existing communities. Moreover, with implementation of
General Plan Update policies and actions intended to guide growth to
appropriate areas and provide services necessary to accommodate growth,
the land uses allowed under the proposed General Plan Update, the
Findings
Page 246 of 266
infrastructure anticipated to accommodate proposed land uses, and the goal
and policy framework would not induce growth that would exceed adopted
thresholds. Therefore, the proposed General Plan Update's incremental
contribution to cumulative land use and population impacts would be less
than cumulatively considerable.
L. MINERAL RESOURCES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to mineral resources?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.12.5, page
5.12-4)
Explanation: The majority of land within the Study Area is designated as MRZ-3, land
for which the significance of mineral resources cannot be determined, or
MRZ-4, areas where available information is inadequate for assignment to
any other MRZ classification. Neither of these MRZ categories are
considered significant mineral resources. The Study Area does not possess
any mineral resource recovery sites. Therefore, implementation of the
General Plan Update would not contribute to a cumulative impact related to
mineral resources.
M. NOISE
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to noise?
Finding: Considerable Contribution and Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR,
Section 5.13.6, pages 5.13-47 through 5.13-49)
Explanation: Table 5.13-14 in the Draft EIR shows that cumulative conditions would
contribute to an exceedance of the City’s transportation noise standards and
would result in significant increases in traffic noise levels at existing
sensitive receptors. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions
to minimized exposure to excessive noise, including noise associated with
traffic. General Plan Policies PS-6.1 through PS-6.10, and Actions PS-6a
through PS-6i, are intended to minimize exposure to excessive noise,
including noise associated with traffic. Specifically, Policies PS-6.1 and PS-
6.2 support noise-compatible land uses in the vicinity of traffic noise
sources and require that new development and infrastructure projects be
reviewed for consistency with the noise standards established in Tables PS-
1 and PS-2. Policy PS-6.2 and Actions PS-6b would ensure that new
development mitigates potential noise impacts through incorporating the
noise control treatments necessary to achieve acceptable noise levels. Policy
PS-6.3 sets criteria for evaluating future increases in traffic noise levels.
However, growth and development anticipated by the General Plan Update
Findings
Page 247 of 266
would result in increased traffic on roadways within the Study Area, which
would cause an increase in traffic noise when compared to existing
conditions. The associated increase in traffic noise would impact existing
uses that occur within the Study Area. Even with the implementation of
General Plan Update policies and actions, the proposed General Plan would
have a cumulatively considerable impact relative to traffic noise.
Implementation of land use planning and policies and actions can minimize
cumulative noise impacts related to stationary sources by avoiding the
placement of noise generating equipment near noise-sensitive land uses and
where unavoidable, include design measures to the degree practicable to
avoid violating the noise criteria presented in the General Plan Update
Public Safety Element Tables PS-3 and PS-4. The General Plan Update also
includes policies and actions that are intended to reduce noise associated
with stationary sources. Policy PS-6.2 and Action PS-6b require new
development to mitigate excessive noise to the standards indicated in Tables
PS-1, PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4 through best practices, including building
location and orientation, building design features, placement of noise-
generating equipment away from sensitive receptors, shielding of noise-
generating equipment, placement of noise-tolerant features between noise
sources and sensitive receptors, and use of noise-minimizing materials.
Implementation of the proposed policies and actions of the General Plan
Update would reduce cumulative noise impacts from stationary noise
sources to a less than significant level.
Short-term construction noise and vibration is a localized activity and would
affect only land uses that are immediately adjacent to a specific project site.
Each construction project would have to comply with the local noise
ordinance and General Plan Update policies and actions, including Action
PS-6e which requires all construction activity to reduce impacts associated
with temporary construction noise to the extent feasible and Action PS-6h,
which requires vibration studies for projects that have the potential to
generate vibration impacts which exceeds the vibration limits. Additionally,
projects would comply with mitigation measures that may be prescribed
pursuant to CEQA provisions that require significant impacts to be reduced
to the extent feasible. In addition, it is unlikely that all construction projects
would occur simultaneously within the City. Thus, a less than significant
impact would occur.
N. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to population and housing?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.14.6, pages
5.14-11 through 5.14-12)
Findings
Page 248 of 266
Explanation: The land uses allowed under the proposed General Plan Update provide
opportunities for cohesive new growth in key locations in the Study Area,
but would not create physical division within existing communities. New
development and redevelopment projects would be designed to complement
the character of existing neighborhoods and provide connectivity between
existing development and new development within the cumulative analysis
area. The proposed General Plan Update does not include any new
roadways, infrastructure, or other features that would divide existing
communities. Moreover, with implementation of General Plan Update
policies and actions intended to guide growth to appropriate areas and
provide services necessary to accommodate growth, the land uses allowed
under the proposed General Plan Update, the infrastructure anticipated to
accommodate proposed land uses, and the goal and policy framework
would not induce growth that would exceed adopted thresholds. Lastly,
General Plan Update implementation would not displace substantial
numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere Therefore, the proposed General Plan
Update's incremental contribution to cumulative land use and population
impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.
O. PUBLIC SERVICES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to public services?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.15.5, pages
5.15-30 through 5.15-31)
Explanation: 2040 buildout under the General Plan Update could yield a net change over
existing conditions of an additional 16,252 housing units, an additional
population of 54,280 people, an additional 21,839,634 square feet of non-
residential building square footage, and an additional 19,674 jobs within the
Study Area. Development and growth facilitated by the General Plan
Update would result in increased demand for public services, including fire
protection, law enforcement, schools, parks, libraries, and other public and
governmental services. As the demand for public services and recreation
increases throughout the 2040 buildout, there will likely be a need to address
acceptable service ratios, response times, and other performance standards.
New or expanded service structures (e.g., offices, maintenance and
administrative buildings, schools, parks, fire facilities, libraries, etc.) may
be needed to provide for adequate staffing, equipment, and appropriate
facilities to serve growth within the cumulative analysis area. The General
Plan Update includes a range of policies and actions that would ensure that
public services are provided in a timely fashion, are adequately funded and
staffed, are coordinated between the City and appropriate service agency,
and that new development funds its fair share of services. The General Plan
Update includes policies to ensure that fire protection and law enforcement
Findings
Page 249 of 266
services keep pace with new development and that school, library, and
governmental services are adequately planned and provided. Payment of
applicable impact fees, and ongoing revenues that would come from
property taxes, sales taxes, and other revenues generated by the future
projects, would ensure that the City maintains acceptable service ratios. The
proposed General Plan Update's incremental contribution to cumulative
public services and recreation impacts would be less than significant.
P. RECREATION
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and
cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts
related to recreation?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.16.5, page
5.16-17)
Explanation: As discussed in Section 5.16.4 of the Draft EIR, the total parkland demand
associated with future development is 535.76 acres. The General Plan
Update proposes a total of 175 acres designated as Parks and 6,188 acres
designated as Open Space to accommodate for the population increase. The
General Plan Update includes policies and actions to ensure that public
services are provided at acceptable levels and to ensure that development
and growth does not outpace the provision of public services. With
adherence to and compliance with the General Plan Update policies and
actions, in addition to adherence to local and environmental regulations, the
impact to recreational and park facilities is considered less than significant.
The significance of impacts to recreational and park facilities resulting from
specific future development would be evaluated on a project-by-project
basis. If future project-level impacts are identified, specific mitigation
measures may be required by CEQA. Therefore, adverse physical impacts
to the environment as a result of newly constructed parks and recreational
facilities associated with implementation of the General Plan Update is
considered to be less than significant.
Q. TRANSPORTATION
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and
cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts
related to transportation?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.17.6, page
5.17-29
Explanation: As described in the Draft EIR, Section 5.17.5, Impact TR-1, the Mobility
Element developed as part of the General Plan Update contains several
policies that support access to and the performance of transit, bicycle, and
Findings
Page 250 of 266
pedestrian facilities. The proposed Mobility Element contains Goal M-4
which supports an extensive and regionally linked network of trails, bicycle
lanes, and sidewalk paths that encourage active transportation, such as
walking and bicycling, as viable for transportation and recreation. The
Mobility Element Policy M-2.4 promotes public transportation programs
that effectively serve the City’s residents and workers by connecting users
to local and regional destinations, including jobs, recreation, retail and other
activity centers.
As described in the Draft EIR, Section 5.17.5, Impact TR-2, the residential
and commuter VMT under the previous General Plan and the proposed
General Plan Update for the City of San Jacinto are shown in Table 5.17-3.
As shown in Table 5.17-3, the General Plan Update is not expected to
increase VMT per person above the current General Plan/No Project
conditions. In fact, home-based VMT per resident, work-based VMT per
employee, and total VMT per service population are expected to under the
proposed General Plan Update. Part of this reduction could be attributed to
the increasingly balanced mix of residential and employment opportunities
within the City. The Land Use and Mobility elements developed as part of
the General Plan Update includes policies to support the reduction of VMT,
including increasing the balanced mix of residential and employment
opportunities within the City with the proposed land uses. Therefore, the
proposed General Plan Update is not expected to increase VMT per person
above No Project conditions. Therefore, the VMT-related impacts of the
General Plan Update would be considered less than significant.
As described in the Draft EIR, Section 5.17.5, Impact TR-3, the types of
uses included as part of the General Plan Update are generally similar to
existing and surrounding uses and thereby are compatible with the existing
uses in the Study Area and in the surrounding area. In addition, the Mobility
Element developed as part of the General Plan Update contains policies in
support of roadway network safety and reducing design hazards.
Additionally, as described under Impact TR-4, as part of the site plan and
design review process (SJDC Chapter 17.630), future development projects
would be reviewed for adequate access as well as consistency with adopted
emergency and evacuation plans among many other environmental issues
in order to ensure the safety of City residents and the physical environment.
In addition, the Safety and Mobility Elements developed as part of the
General Plan Update contains policies in support of emergency access along
local roads.
Overall, implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in
cumulatively considerable transportation impacts with implementation of
the proposed General Plan Update goals and policies. Impacts would be less
than significant in this regard.
Findings
Page 251 of 266
R. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and
cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts
related to tribal cultural resources?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.18.6, page
5.18-14)
Explanation: Construction of the individual development projects allowed under the land
use designations of General Plan Update may result in the discovery and
removal of tribal cultural resources. The General Plan Update policies and
actions, as well as federal, State, and local regulations, would reduce the
risk to tribal cultural resources in the region. As discussed above, site-
specific development with the potential to impact tribal cultural resources
would require a resource assessment and coordination with the tribes to
determine the potential for tribal cultural resources and identification of
mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the
proposed development. Adherence to the General Plan Update policies and
actions, and existing federal, State and local regulations would avoid and/or
minimize a cumulative loss of tribal cultural resources. Therefore, the
General Plan Update’s incremental contribution to cumulative tribal
cultural resource impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.
S. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and
cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts
related to utilities and service systems?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.19.6, pages
5.19-54 through 5.19-56)
Explanation: Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative
projects would increase demand for water, wastewater, stormwater, solid
waste, electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications services within the
Study Area.
Water
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative
projects would increase demand for water services within the City of San
Jacinto Water District, EMWD, and/or LHMWD service area. All three
water service providers in the Study Area have concluded in their respective
UWMPs that they would be able to meet projected future water demands
under normal, dry, and multiple dry water years. Future development
projects accommodated through implementation of the General Plan Update
Findings
Page 252 of 266
would be evaluated by the City on a project-by-project basis to determine
potential impacts to water supplies and infrastructure. The continued
assessment of individual projects for impacts to the water supply system
would assure projects would only be approved if adequate water supplies
exist at the time of their implementation. All future development would be
subject to all applicable federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, and
regulations in place for water supply and infrastructure. Further, new
development would be required to pay all applicable connection fees and
ongoing user fees related to the provision of water services. Therefore,
implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in
cumulatively considerable water supply and infrastructure impacts.
Wastewater
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative
projects would increase demand for wastewater services within the sewer
service area. As discussed above, the total amount of projected wastewater
flow to EMWD’s San Jacinto Valley RWRF, where San Jacinto sewer water
is treated and/or disposed of, for the year 2040 would be approximately 16.4
MGD. The current capacity for the San Jacinto Valley RWRF is 14 MGD
and the maximum capacity for the treatment facility is 27 MGD. Therefore,
the ultimate capacity of the facility would be able to meet the projected
wastewater production from the City of San Jacinto. The General Plan
Update does not include specific development proposals; individual
development projects would be required to verify that existing capacity
exists to convey and treat the potential wastewater generated with the new
development. At the time future wastewater facilities are proposed, they
would require a separate environmental review and compliance with
regulations in existence at that time would address potential environmental
impacts related to the construction and operation of new wastewater
facilities. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies,
and actions to ensure adequate wastewater services and facilities. Therefore,
cumulative impacts to wastewater services and facilities would be less than
significant.
Stormwater
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative
projects would increase demand for stormwater services within the Study
Area. As discussed above, the General Plan Update does not include
specific development proposals; therefore, the environmental effects of
future storm water drainage facilities are unknown at this time. At the time
future stormwater facilities are proposed, they would require a separate
environmental review and compliance with regulations in existence at that
time would address potential environmental impacts related to the
construction and operation of new stormwater facilities. Additionally, the
General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions to ensure adequate
Findings
Page 253 of 266
stormwater service and facilities. Therefore, cumulative impacts to
stormwater services and facilities would be less than significant.
Solid Waste
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative
projects would increase demand for solid waste collection and disposal
services. San Jacinto, along with cities and County lands in the surrounding
area, would continue to use common landfill resources, thereby gradually
reducing the capacity of local landfills. The General Plan Update does not
include specific development proposals; however, the increase in solid
waste generation due to future individual and cumulative development
projects together could significantly impact solid waste resources.
Individual development projects and related cumulative projects would be
required to meet current recycling goals, reducing the amount of solid waste
requiring disposal at landfills. Future developments would be reviewed on
a project-by-project basis and solid waste impacts would be evaluated based
on existing and planned disposal facilities and capacities available at that
time. In addition, all future development would be required to comply with
the mandatory commercial and multifamily recycling requirements of AB
341, thus reducing the amount of landfill waste. Furthermore, the General
Plan Update goals, policies, and actions would reduce the demand for solid
waste disposal. Therefore, the contribution of the General Plan Update to
cumulative impacts associated with increased solid waste would be less than
significant.
Electric Power, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative
projects would increase demand for electrical, natural gas, and
telecommunications services within the Study Area. As noted above, the
General Plan Update does not include specific development proposals;
individual development projects would be required to verify that electric
power, natural gas, and telecommunications usage generated with the new
development would not create significant environmental impacts.
Therefore, the contribution of the General Plan Update to cumulative
impacts associated with increased electric power, natural gas, and
telecommunications would be less than significant.
T. WILDFIRE
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result
in cumulatively considerable impacts related to wildfire?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.20.5, page
5.20-25 through 5.20-26)
Findings
Page 254 of 266
Explanation: The General Plan Update ensures that the City’s emergency access routes
and public information regarding designated emergency facilities and routes
are regularly reviewed to ensure that up to date information is available to
the City and the public in the event of an emergency. Important new and
expanded critical facilities would also be located in a way to ensure
resiliency and functionality in the event of a natural disaster.
Implementation of the General Plan Update would have a less than
significant impact with regard to this issue. No specific aspect as a result of
implementation of the General Plan Update will substantially alter the
slope, prevailing winds, or other factors that would increase exposure to San
Jacinto residents, employees or visitors to increased pollutant
concentrations from wildfire or result in the uncontrollable spread of a
wildfire. General Plan Update implementation would not exacerbate
wildfire risks in VHFHSZs; therefore, these impacts would be less than
significant. The General Plan Update is a long-range policy document that
does not include site-specific designs or plans, and does not propose any
entitlements for specific developments. However, future development may
require extension and development of infrastructure such as roads, water
and sewer utilities, and fuel breaks into areas designated as FHSZs. The
potential for future projects to impact environmental resources are mitigated
through compliance with fire development standards (such as fuel breaks
and clearance requirements) and would require site-specific environmental
analysis as required under CEQA. As demonstrated throughout this EIR,
implementation of the various policies and actions contained in the General
Plan Update would reduce potential impacts associated with the
construction and expansion of infrastructure. Implementation of the General
Plan Update policies and actions combined with local and State
requirements, as detailed previously, would ensure that potential wildland
fire hazards would not be exacerbated by new local infrastructure, and this
impact would be considered less than significant. While the General Plan
Update cannot state with certainty that future risks associated with post-fire
flooding and debris flow would not occur in the Study Area, implementation
of the General Plan Update would not exacerbate this risk. Implementation
of General Plan Update policies and actions, as well as compliance with the
City’s Municipal Code, would reduce this risk to the greatest extent feasible,
resulting in an impact that is less than significant as a result of adoption and
implementation of the proposed General Plan Update. Implementation of
the goals and policies provided would ensure that the proposed General Plan
Update’s incremental contribution to cumulative wildfire impacts would be
less than cumulatively considerable.
Findings
Page 255 of 266
SECTION VI
FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL
CHANGES
Sections 15126(c) and 15126.2(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, require that an EIR
address any significant irreversible environmental changes that would occur should the project be
implemented. Generally, a project would result in significant irreversible environmental changes
if any of the following would occur:
The project would involve a large commitment of non-renewable resources;
The primary and secondary impacts of the project would generally commit future
generations to similar uses;
The project involves uses in which irreversible damage could result from any
potential environmental accidents; or
The proposed consumption of resources is not justified.
Consumption of Nonrenewable Resources
Future development would consume limited, slowly renewable and non-renewable
resources. This consumption would occur during each individual project’s construction phase and
would continue throughout its operational lifetime. Future development would require a
commitment of resources that would include: (1) building materials; (2) fuel and operational
materials/resources; and (3) the transportation of goods and persons to and from individual
development sites. Construction would require the consumption of resources that are not
renewable or which may renew so slowly as to be considered non-renewable. These resources
would include the following construction supplies: lumber and other forest products; aggregate
materials used in concrete and asphalt; metals; and water. Fossil fuels such as gasoline and oil
would also be consumed to power construction vehicles and equipment.
Development accommodated through implementation of the General Plan Update would
consume resources which would be similar to those currently consumed within the City (i.e.,
energy resources such as electricity and natural gas, petroleum-based fuels required for vehicle-
trips, fossil fuels, and water). Fossil fuels would represent the primary energy source associated
with both construction and ongoing operation, and the existing, finite supplies of these natural
resources would be incrementally reduced. Future development operations would occur in
accordance with California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6, which sets forth
conservation practices that would limit energy consumption. Nonetheless, t he proposed Project’s
energy requirements would represent a long-term commitment of essentially non-renewable
resources.
Construction activities associated with implementation of the General Plan Update could
release hazardous materials into the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions; refer to Section 5.9 in the Draft EIR. All potential demolition, grading, and
excavation activities would be subject to the established regulatory framework to ensure that
Findings
Page 256 of 266
hazardous materials are not released into the environment. Compliance with the established
regulatory framework and mitigation measures would protect against a significant and irreversible
environmental change resulting from the accidental release of hazardous materials. In addition,
there is the potential that individual future development projects would use and store limited
amounts of potentially hazardous materials typical. All future development activities requiring the
routine use, storage, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials would be subject to all applicable
Federal, State, and local regulations and standards in place for hazardous materials. Compliance
with these regulations and standards would protect against significant and irreversible
environmental changes due to the accidental release of hazardous materials.
In conclusion, future construction and operations would result in the irretrievable
commitment of limited, slowly renewable, and nonrenewable resources, which would limit the
availability of these resource quantities for future generations or for other uses during the life of
the individual developments. It is noted that the continued use of such resources would be on a
relatively small scale in a regional context.
Irretrievable Commitments/Irreversible Physical Changes
Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in a commitment of land uses
designated for the foreseeable future. Land use and development consistent with the General Plan
Update would result in irretrievable commitments by introducing development onto sites that are
presently undeveloped. The conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses would result in an
irretrievable loss of agricultural land, wildlife habitat, and open space. Additionally, development
would physically change the environment in terms of aesthetics, air emission, noise, traffic, open
space, and natural resources. These physical changes are irreversible after development occurs.
Therefore, the General Plan Update would result in changes in land use within the Study Area that
would commit future generations to these uses.
In summary, the General Plan Update includes an extensive policy framework that is
designed to address land use and environmental issues to the greatest extent feasible, while
allowing growth and economic prosperity for the City. However, even with the policies and actions
that would serve to reduce potential significant impacts, future development associated with
implementation of the General Plan Update would result in significant irreversible changes. This
impact is considered a significant and unavoidable impact under CEQA.
Findings
Page 257 of 266
SECTION VII
GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS
Section 15126.2(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines requires a Draft EIR to discuss the ways
the Project could foster economic or population growth or the construction of additional housing,
directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15126.2(d), a Project would be considered to have a growth-inducing effect if it would:
Directly or indirectly foster economic or population growth, or the construction of
additional housing in the surrounding environment;
Remove obstacles to population growth (e.g., construction of an infrastructure
expansion to allow for more construction in service areas);
Tax existing community service facilities, requiring the construction of new facilities
that could cause significant environmental effects; or
Encourage and facilitate other activities that could significantly affect the environment,
either individually or cumulatively.
In addition, CEQA Guidelines state that growth inducement must not be assumed.
The General Plan Update accommodates future growth in San Jacinto, including new
businesses, expansion of existing businesses, and new residential uses. Infrastructure and services
would need to accommodate future growth. The General Plan Update is oriented toward the
economic growth of the City, with emphasis given to encouraging development of a broader array
of businesses, increasing local emplo yment opportunities, and providing residential development
as necessary to serve economic growth. The cumulative development scenario addressed in this
Draft EIR assumes a 20-year planning horizon (the level of development that could reasonably be
expected by the year 2040), while the year 2060 is assumed to be the full buildout year of the
General Plan (the point at which all parcels in the City are developed according to their General
Plan land use designation). The 20-year planning horizon (2040) represents approximately 50
percent of total buildout; this expected pace of growth is based on historical development patterns
in and around San Jacinto and development trends projected for Western Riverside County.
As shown in Table 3-5 of the Draft EIR, buildout of the General Plan Update through 2040
could yield up to 16,252 new housing units and 21,839,634 square feet of new non -residential
building square footage within the Study Area.
With implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions intended to guide growth
to appropriate areas and provide services necessary to accommodate growth, the land uses allowed
under the General Plan Update, the infrastructure anticipated to accommodate proposed land uses,
and the goal and policy framework would not induce growth that would exceed adopted thresholds.
Therefore, population and housing growth associated with the General Plan Update would result
a less than significant impact.
Findings
Page 258 of 266
SECTION VIII
ALTERNATIVES
A. BACKGROUND
The Draft EIR analyzed three alternatives to the Project as proposed and evaluated these
alternatives for their ability to avoid or reduce the Project’s significant environmental effects while
also meeting the majority of the Project’s objectives. The City finds that it has considered and
rejected as infeasible two of the three alternatives identified in the EIR and described below. This
section sets forth the potential alternatives to the Project analyzed in the EIR and evaluates them
in light of the Project objectives, as required by CEQA.
Where significant impacts are identified, section 15126.6 of the State CEQA Guidelines
requires EIRs to consider and discuss alternatives to the proposed actions. Subsection (a) states:
(a) An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to
the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic
objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the
significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the
alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a
project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible
alternatives that will foster informed decision-making and public
participation. An EIR is not required to consider alternatives which are
infeasible. The lead agency is responsible for selecting a range of project
alternatives for examination and must publicly disclose its reasoning for
selecting those alternatives. There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or
scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason.
Subsection 15126.6(b) states the purpose of the alternatives analysis:
(b) Because an EIR must identify ways to mitigate or avoid the significant effects
that a project may have on the environment (Public Resources Code Section
21002.1), the discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the
project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening
any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede
to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more
costly.
In subsection 15126.6(c), the State CEQA Guidelines describe the selection process for a
range of reasonable alternatives:
(c) The range of potential alternatives to the proposed project shall include those
that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic objectives of the Project and
could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects. The
EIR should briefly describe the rationale for selecting the alternatives to be
discussed. The EIR should also identify any alternatives that were considered
by the lead agency but were rejected as infeasible during the scoping process
Findings
Page 259 of 266
and briefly explain the reasons underlying the lead agency’s determination.
Additional information explaining the choice of alternatives may be included
in the administrative record. Among the factors that may be used to eliminate
alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (i) failure to meet most
of the basic project objectives, (ii) infeasibility, or (iii) inability to avoid
significant environmental impacts.
The range of alternatives required is governed by a “rule of reason” that requires the EIR
to set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice. The EIR shall include
sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and
comparison with the proposed Project. Alternatives are limited to ones that would avoid or
substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the Project. Of those alternatives, the EIR need
examine in detail only the ones that the lead agency determines could feasibly attain most of the
basic objectives of the Project.
B. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The following objectives have been established for the Project (Draft EIR, page 3-4):
1. Reflect the current goals and vision expressed by city residents, businesses, decision-
makers, and other stakeholders;
2. Protect and enhance San Jacinto’s unique history and character;
3. Promote San Jacinto as a safe, vibrant, and family-friendly community;
4. Proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner;
5. Encourage the revitalization of San Jacinto’s Main Street and other community activity
centers;
6. Allow for a range of housing options;
7. Attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents;
8. Create a more balanced jobs-housing ratio within the community;
9. Continue to maintain and improve multimodal transportation opportunities;
10. Maintain strong fiscal sustainability and continue to provide efficient and adequate public
services;
11. Address new requirements of State law; and
12. Address emerging transportation, housing, and employment trends.
C. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT REJECTED FROM DETAILED
ANALYSIS
Section 15126.6(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines specifies that an EIR should (1) identify
alternatives that were considered by the lead agency but were eliminated from detailed
consideration because they were determined to be infeasible during the scoping process; and (2)
briefly explain the reasons underlying the lead agency’s determination. Among the factors that
may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (i) failure to meet
most of the basic project objectives; (ii) infeasibility; and/or (iii) inability to avoid significant
environmental impacts.
There were no alternatives considered but rejected from detailed analysis in the EIR.
Findings
Page 260 of 266
D. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES SELECTED FOR ANALYSIS
The alternatives selected for further detailed review within the EIR focus on alternatives
that could potentially reduce the Project’s significant environmental impacts, while still meeting
most of the basic Project objectives. Those alternatives include:
Alternative 1: No Project Alternative (Draft EIR, pages 7-6 through 7-15)
Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative (Draft EIR, pages 7-15 through 7-
23)
Alternative 3: Employment Focused Alternative (Draft EIR, pages 7-23 through
7-32)
1. Alternative 1: No Project Alternative
Description: Under Alternative 1, the City would continue to implement the existing
General Plan and no changes would be made to address updated OPR General Plan
Guidelines, or the requirements of State law. Since adoption of the existing General Plan,
State legislation has been passed requiring the City to address new safety and circulation
requirements in the General Plan and to further address greenhouse gas emissions.
Additionally, the City recently updated its Housing Element (adopted in February 2022),
and the existing General Plan does not conform to State requirements regarding planning
for future housing growth. The General Plan goals, policies, and actions, as well as the
Land Use Map, would not be updated to address the vision and concerns of the City’s
residents, property owners, decision-makers, and other stakeholders that actively
participated in the visioning and goal and policy development process.
Alternative 1 would result in the continuation of existing conditions and development
levels. New growth would be allowed as envisioned under the existing General Plan, with
land uses required to be consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use Map.
Alternative 1 (No Project Alternative) would result in significantly less development within
the City compared to the proposed Project. Under Alternative 1, the existing General Plan
policy framework would still be in effect, which would constitute a status quo approach to
land use regulation in the City. The Proposed Land Use Map, along with the policy
framework proposed by the General Plan Update, encourages and aims to achieve a
community with a balanced land use pattern that meets the City’s long-term housing,
employment, and civic needs. The land uses allowed under the General Plan Update would
provide opportunities for cohesive new growth at in-fill locations within existing urbanized
areas of the City, as well as new growth adjacent to existing urbanized areas and along
transportation corridors. A mix and balance of uses to provide an improved ratio of local
jobs to population, would ensure that development pays its fair-share of necessary
roadway, public service, and other infrastructure improvements, and that increased
protection of natural resources would occur. The proposed General Plan Update was
prepared in conformance with State laws and regulations associated with the preparation
of general plans, including requirements for environmental protection.
Alternative 1 would not include updated policies, particularly those related to housing,
Findings
Page 261 of 266
greenhouse gases, hazards, complete streets, and environmental justice to address
environmental health concerns for disadvantaged communities, as required by State law.
This alternative would not include policies proposed in the General Plan Update to ensure
protection of environmental resources, both at a project level and under cumulative
conditions, consistent with the objectives of CEQA.
Impacts: As shown in Draft EIR Table 7-5, Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts
as the proposed project for the environmental issues of: Agricultural Resources, Hydrology
and Water Quality, and Mineral Resources. Alternative 1 would result in reduced impacts
to Air Quality, Energy, Noise, Public Services and Recreation, Utilities and Servic e
Systems, and Irreversible Effects. Alternative 1 would result in increased impacts to
Aesthetics, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas
Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Land Use and Planning, Population and
Housing, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Wildfire. This alternative would
fail to reduce any significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level.
Additionally, this alternative would have a new significant and unavoidable impact in
regards to Population and Housing, since it would not allow the City to meet its RHNA
obligations and would preclude certification of the City’s Housing Element.
Attainment of Project Objectives: This alternative would not meet most of the
project objectives, including the following: reflect the current goals and vision expressed
by City residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders; proactively plan for
and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner; encourage the
revitalization of San Jacinto’s Main Street and other community activity centers; allow for
a range of housing options; attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs
for local residents; continue to maintain and improve multimodal transportation
opportunities; address new requirements of State law; and address emerging transportation,
housing, and employment trends.
Finding: The City Council rejects Alternative 1: No Project Alternative, on the following
ground, which provides sufficient justification for rejection of this alternative: (1) the
alternative fails to meet most of the Project objectives; (2) the alternative fails to avoid or
reduce the Project’s significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level;
and (3) this alternative would have a new significand and unavoidable impact in regards to
Population and Housing since it would not allow the City to meet its RHNA obligations
and would preclude certification of the City’s Housing Element.
2. Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative
Description: Alternative 2 (Reduced Growth Alternative) continues to allow for new
development in single-use and mixed-use formats, like those included in the proposed
Project, but at lower densities and intensities that are more consistent with those allowed
under the current General Plan. The goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan Update
would apply to subsequent development, planning, and infrastructure projects under this
alternative. This Alternative is defined by three major changes from the proposed General
Plan Update:
Findings
Page 262 of 266
1. Reduction in the maximum density and intensity associated with the Mixed-Use
(MU) land use designation; in Alternative 2, the maximum density for residential
development in areas designated for MU is reduced from 36 du/ac to 22 du/ac
(consistent with the maximum density proposed for the High Density Residential
land use designation) and the maximum intensity for nonresidential development is
reduced from 1.0 FAR to 0.50 FAR (consistent with the maximum intensity
proposed for the Commercial land use designation).
2. Elimination of the Downtown Village (DV) land use designation; in Alternative 2,
areas previously designated for DV are designated for High Density Residential
(HDR).
3. Elimination of the Very High Density Residential (VHDR) land use designation; in
Alternative 2, areas previously designated for VHDR are designated for High
Density Residential (HDR).
This alternative continues to allow for mixed-use opportunities with less
development potential, and in more limited areas, than allowed under the General Plan
Update. It also reflects a maximum residential density of 22 du/ac, consistent with the
maximum residential density allowed under the current General Plan.
Alternative 2 would result in approximately 4,339 fewer housing units and 14,493 fewer
residents within San Jacinto when compared to the proposed General Plan Land Use Map.
Nonresidential development potential would be reduced by 788,524 square feet and
employment opportunities would be decreased under this alternative, with approximately
3,044 fewer jobs created within the City limits when compared to the proposed General
Plan Update.
Impacts: As shown in Draft EIR Table 7-5, Alternative 2 would result in the same impacts
as the proposed project for the environmental issues of: Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources,
Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous
Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing,
Tribal Cultural Resources, and Wildfire. Alternative 2 would result in reduced impacts to
Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use and Planning, Noise, Public
Services and Recreation, Utilities and Service Systems, and Irreversible Effects.
Alternative 2 would result in increased impacts to Transportation. This alternative would
fail to reduce any significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level.
Attainment of Project Objectives: Alternative 2 meets most of the project objectives. Like
the proposed project, Alternative 2 reflects the current goals and vision expressed by city
residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders; protects and enhances San
Jacinto’s unique history and character; promotes San Jacinto as a safe, vibrant, and family-
friendly community; proactively plans for and accommodates local and regional growth in
a responsible manner; encourages the revitalization of San Jacinto’s Main Street and other
community activity centers; allows for a range of housing options, although not to the same
extent as the proposed Project; attracts and retains businesses and industries that provide
jobs for local residents; creates a more balanced jobs-housing ratio within the community;
Findings
Page 263 of 266
continues to maintain and improve multimodal transportation opportunities; maintains
strong fiscal sustainability and continues to provide efficient and adequate public services;
and addresses emerging transportation, housing, and employment trends. Although
Alternative 2 would address new requirements of State law, it would not allow the City to
meet its RHNA obligations and would preclude certification of the City’s Housing
Element.
Finding: The City Council rejects Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative, on the
following ground, which provides sufficient justification for rejection of this alternative:
(1) the alternative fails to meet all of the Project objectives; (2) the alternative fails to avoid
or reduce the Project’s significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level;
and (3) the alternative would have a new significant and unavoidable impact in regards to
Population and Housing since it would not allow the City to meet its RHNA obligations
and would preclude certification of the City’s Housing Element.
3. Alternative 3: Employment Focused Alternative
Description: Alternative 3 (Employment Focused Alternative) reflects a land use pattern
designed to promote nonresidential development and employment opportunities.
Alternative 3 modifies the uses allowed within the Mixed-Use land use designation to only
allow for a mix of nonresidential (commercial, industrial, and business park) land uses
while precluding residential development. Alternative 3 also eliminates the Downtown
Village (DV) land use; for parcels designated as DV in the proposed Project, Alternative 3
designates these parcels for Commercial development. The goals, policies, and actions of
the General Plan Update would apply to subsequent development, planning, and
infrastructure projects under this alternative.
Alternative 3 would result in approximately 12,649 fewer housing units and 42,250 fewer
residents within San Jacinto when compared to the proposed General Plan Land Use Map.
Nonresidential square feet would be reduced by 4,087,964 square feet and employment
opportunities would be decreased under this alternative, with approximately 6,347 fewer
jobs created within the City limits when compared to the proposed General Plan.
Impacts: As shown in Draft EIR Table 7-5, Alternative 3 would result in the same impacts
as the proposed project for the environmental issues of: Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources,
Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous
Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources,
Tribal Cultural Resources, and Wildfire. Alternative 3 would result in reduced impacts to
Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, Public Services and Recreation,
Utilities and Service Systems, and Irreversible Effects. Alternative 3 would result in
increased impacts to Population and Housing and Transportation. This alternative would
fail to reduce an y significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level.
Additionally, this alternative would have a new significant and unavoidable impact in
regards to Population and Housing, since it would not allow the City to meet its RHNA
obligations and would preclude certification of the City’s Housing Element.
Attainment of Project Objectives: Alternative 3 meets most of the project objectives, but
Findings
Page 264 of 266
not to the same extent as the Project. Like the proposed Project, Alternative 3 reflects the
current goals and vision expressed by city residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other
stakeholders; protects and enhances San Jacinto’s unique history and character; promotes
San Jacinto as a safe, vibrant, and family-friendly communit y; proactively plans for and
accommodates local and regional growth in a responsible manner; encourages the
revitalization of San Jacinto’s Main Street and other community activity centers; allows
for a range of housing options, although not to the same extent as the proposed Project;
attracts and retains businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents; creates a
more balanced jobs-housing ratio within the community; continues to maintain and
improve multimodal transportation opportunities; maintains strong fiscal sustainability and
continues to provide efficient and adequate public services; and addresses emerging
transportation, housing, and employment trends. Although Alternative 3 would address
new requirements of State law, it would not allow the City to meet its RHNA obligations
and would preclude certification of the City’s Housing Element.
Finding: The City Council rejects Alternative 3: Employment Focused Alternative, on the
following ground, which provides sufficient justification for rejection of this alternative:
(1) the alternative fails to meet all of the Project objectives; (2) the alternative fails to avoid
or reduce the Project’s significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level;
(3) the alternative would have a new significant and unavoidable impact in regards to
Population and Housing since it would not allow the City to meet its RHNA obligations
and would preclude certification of the City’s Housing Element.
E. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE
Section 15126.6(e)(2) of the State CEQA Guidelines indicates that an analysis of
alternatives to a proposed Project shall identify an environmentally superior alternative among the
alternatives evaluated in an EIR. Based on the alternatives analysis contained within the Draft EIR,
Alternative 2 (Reduced Growth Alternative) is identified as the Environmentally Superior
Alternative.
Alternative 2 (Reduced Growth Alternative) is the environmentally superior alternative as
it is the most effective in terms of overall reductions of impacts compared to the proposed General
Plan Update and all other alternatives. Alternative 2 meets most of the project objectives. Like the
proposed project, Alternative 2 reflects the current goals and vision expressed by city residents,
businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders; protects and enhances San Jacinto’s unique
history and character; promotes San Jacinto as a safe, vibrant, and family-friendly community;
proactively plans for and accommodates local and regional growth in a responsible manner;
encourages the revitalization of San Jacinto’s Main Street and other community activity centers;
allows for a range of housing options, although not to the same extent as the proposed Project;
attracts and retains businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents; creates a more
balanced jobs-housing ratio within the community; continues to maintain and improve multimodal
transportation opportunities; maintains strong fiscal sustainability and continues to provide
efficient and adequate public services; and addresses emerging transportation, housing, and
employment trends. Although Alternative 2 would address new requirements of State law, it would
not allow the City to meet its RHNA obligations and would preclude certification of the City’s
Housing Element. Therefore, City Council rejects the environmentally superior alternative.
Findings
Page 265 of 266
SECTION IX
ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093(a), the City Council must balance, as
applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project against its
unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the Project. If the specific
benefits of the Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, those
environmental effects may be considered acceptable.
Having reduced the adverse significant environmental effects of the Project to the extent
feasible through the implementation of the General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions;
having considered the entire administrative record on the Project; the City Council has weighed
the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable adverse impacts after mitigation in regards to
agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise.
While recognizing that the unavoidable adverse impacts are significant under CEQA thresholds,
the City Council nonetheless finds that the unavoidable adverse impacts that will result from the
Project are acceptable and outweighed by specific social, economic and other benefits of the
Project.
In making this determination, the factors and public benefits specified below were
considered. Any one of these reasons is sufficient to justify approval of the Project. Thus, even if
a court were to conclude that not every reason is supported by substantial evidence, the City
Council would be able to stand by its determination that each individual reason is sufficient. The
substantial evidence supporting the various benefits can be found in the preceding findings, which
are incorporated by reference into this section, and in the documents found in the Records of
Proceeding.
The City Council therefore finds that for each of the significant impacts which are subject
to a finding under CEQA Section 21081(a)(3), that each of the following social, economic, and
environmental benefits of the Project, independent of the other benefits, outweigh the potential
significant unavoidable adverse impacts and render acceptable each and every one of these
unavoidable adverse environmental impacts:
1. The General Plan Update promotes more compact, environmentally-sustainable, and
equitable development through goals, policies, and actions that balance the need for
adequate infrastructure, housing, economic vitality, and environmental justice with the
need for resource management, environmental protection, and preservation of quality of
life for San Jacinto residents.
2. The General Plan Update implements principles of sustainable growth by concentrating
new urban development around existing urban development, and along key commercial
and transportation corridors; thereby minimizing land consumption while maintaining
open space, habitat, and recreation uses throughout the Study Area.
Findings
Page 266 of 266
3. The General Plan Update provides a land use map that accounts for existing development,
physical constraints, economic development, hazards, and incompatible uses and assigns
densities and use types accordingly to enhance the safety, livability, and economic vitality
of San Jacinto.
4. The General Plan Update improves mobility options through the development of a multi-
modal transportation network that enhances connectivity, supports community
development patterns, limits traffic congestion, promotes public and alternative
transportation methods, and supports the goals of adopted regional transportation plans.
5. The General Plan Update directs the preservation and environmental stewardship of the
vast array of natural, cultural and historic resources that uniquely define the character and
ecological importance of the City and greater region.
6. The General Plan Update addresses adverse environmental effects associated with global
climate change by facilitating sustainable development, promoting energy efficiency, and
promoting development that reduces greenhouse gas emissions.
7. The General Plan Update enhances the local economy and provides opportunities for future
jobs and business development commensurate with forecasted growth by planning for
commercial and industrial development near existing urbanized areas and transportation
corridors.
8. The General Plan Update is the product of a comprehensive public planning effort driven
by members of the public, city stakeholders, the Planning Commission and the City
Council through a series of public meetings, hearings and workshops that resulted in a
thoughtful balance of community, economic, social, and environmental interests.