HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 2/2/2021 Morton, Sherry
From: Nydia Ibarra <nibarra@aqmd.gov>
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 4:46 PM
To: Nydia Ibarra
Cc: Monika Kim; Cristina Lopez
Subject: Public Comment-South Coast A.Q.M.D
Attachments: wham-flyer.pdf; wham-brochure-2020-v2.pdf; 2021 Faith Based Event Save the Date
(003).pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of Cityof San Jacinto -- DO NOT CLICK on links or
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.]
Dear City Clerk,
If possible, I would like to kindly request to submit the following information as a public comment on the next available
agenda.
Sincerely,
Nydia Ibarra
• Please join the South Coast Air Quality Management District for a virtual event "A Clean
Air Conversation with Community Faith Leaders — Clean Air is a Matter of Life and Breath"
on Thursday, February 18, 2021 from 9:30 am to 10:30 am. We welcome leaders of all
faiths to join us for an open discussion on the impacts of air pollution in our communities.
Come to learn, discuss and share your thoughts on improving air quality. For more
information and/or to register, please contact communityleaders@agmd.gov or call (909)
396-2114.
• The South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) also has an
exciting opportunity for middle and high schools in Riverside County. South Coast
AQMD's air quality education program, the Why Healthy Air Matters (WHAM)
program, is currently being offered at no cost to eligible middle and high schools within
the South Coast AQMD's jurisdiction. The WHAM Program utilizes Kids Making
Sense®, a Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM)-based educational
curriculum that teaches students about air quality issues. Students have the opportunity to
conduct hands-on experiments, including measuring air quality with hand-held sensors.
The program accommodates distance learning. Virtual options include guest speakers
(via videoconference), video lectures, and PowerPoints for each unit. WHAM will also
be available for teachers in summer school. Spaces are limited. For more information,
please visit www.aqmd.gov/WHAM or contact Monika Kim at mkim(q agmd.gov.
1
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and
confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution,copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone(909-396-3086)or by
electronic mail(nibarra(c�agmd.gov), and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.
2
•
310;°17- tit
* ' Ili •
14.
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
00 Middle l High School
•
Air Quality Education
AUQnnao Program
Fully Funded
Free curriculum offered to qualified middle and high
schools within the South Coast AQMD's jurisdiction
(all of Orange County, and parts of Los Angeles,
Riverside and San Bernardino Counties).
Hands-on Experiments
Students can measure air quality and interpret
data of pollution in your community.
Accommodates Distance Learning
Virtual options include guest speakers,
PowerPoints, pre-recorded video lectures& more!
CLICK HERETO SIGN UP
For more information visit agmd.gov/WHAM or contact
Monika Kim at mkim@agmd.gov,909-396-2342.
WHAM Curriculum Roadmapealthy Air Matters South Coast Air Quality
0
Management District
1. Our Air and Middle School and High School
Pollution 2. Particle Pollution 9
South Coast
(50100min.) (50-100min.) Education Program
AQMD
3. Particle Sources 4. Health Effects of
(50min. or more) Particles ,:
(50-100min.)
5. Measuring Particles 6. Held ti.
(50min.) Measurements
(100min. or more) _
7. Interpret Your Data 8. Be Part of the 1
(50min.) Solution ,,
(50min. or more)
.t.
niva„
[KIDS MAKIM61
For more information H.
II
N.
about the program or to refer
a school for potential participation, tik, �!'' 4
please contact: Kids Making ��
Sense®Kit
Monika Kim
Phone: (909) 396-2342
Email: mkim@agmd.gov
Itiffilltel
0
South Coast Air Quality Stay connected with us
• Management District @SouthCoastAQMD Why Healthy Air Matters
South Coast www.aqmd.gov O
AQMD 1-800-CUT-SMOG Iri YouTube
What is South Coast Air Quality Management District's Does the program fit in with state standards?
WHAM Program? Curriculum
Workbook
T
KIDS MAKING South Coast AQMD's middle school The Kids Making Sense® curriculum is Kids Malting Sense
eENSIC, and high school education program, aligned with the California State Core Science "`+N'*
% 4,0
Why Healthy Air Matters (WHAM), Curriculum for middle school and high school. ` ,P
is an exciting Science, Technology, The curriculum unites STEM education and ,:
INMANEngineering and Math (STEM)-based Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) 4!. -Ai
education program that teaches students with hands-on experiential learning and F'�
Why Healthy Air Matters about air quality. The program utilizes introduces Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs)
r .\
Sonoma Technology, Inc.'s Kids Making through experiments that reinforce Science
a Sense® curriculum, developed by air and Engineering Practices (SEPs) and
�.atlr,G•d y.
d® quality scientists and educators and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs). -
thoroughly tested by teachers and
students around the world. What will each participating school receive?
, .1 • • t
AirBeam2 Air Monitor,AirCasting App Each participating school will receive a Kids ..
Making Sense® kit, which includes AirBeam2 lJ
portable air quality monitors, paired smartphones, n '
Why is the WHAM Program important? a teacher's guide, student workbooks and all r, 7 �.„4:
supplies and materials needed to successfully '
• . ...
South Coast AQMD's jurisdiction encompasses Orange County complete each experiment in the workbook.
air- 1
and the urban portions of Los Angeles, Riverside and San -
.
Bernardino counties, and is home to more than 17 million people—
'.-The WHAM program offers features and support
the second most populated urban area in the United States.This to provide teachers with maximum flexibility and
region suffers from some of the poorest air quality in the nation learning tools to accommodate their class and
and does not meet federal standards for both ozone student needs. If circumstances allow, we offer
(smog) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). in-person guest speakers to visit all participating classrooms.
Additionally, we offer the following flexible options to aid in
This program will increase awareness of air quality issues within the successful implementation of the program:
environmental justice communities in South Coast AQMD's • South Coast AQMD guest speaker via ZOOM;
jurisdiction. It utilizes a community-focused approach, designed • PowerPoint presentations for each unit;
to teach youth about the science of air quality, public policy and • Pre-recorded video lectures; and,
technology-based solutions. • Air quality related videos.
,/0 1
+ 1 - ,4 it.
South Coast rj ► 0 t�
AQMD l G, y �`,� �,� j
.� N.... . � _ . ,, . .`
. - South Coast Air Quality Management Distric �-
•
A Clean Air Conversation
Tith
Community
Clean Air is a Matter of Life and Breath
We welcome leaders of all faiths to join us for a virtual discussion on the impacts of air pollution in
our communities. Come to learn, discuss and share your thoughts on improving air quality.
Save the Date •
February 18, 2021 • 9:30 AM - 10:30 AM ID Virtual
For more information or to RSVP, please contact communityleaders@aqmd.gov or via phone at (909) 396-2114.
Morton. Sherry
From: Espinoza,Julia
Sent Tuesday, February 2,2021 6:49 PM
To: Morton,Sherry
Subject FW:public comment 2.2.21
'ii/,d aginCs2Ca
City of San Jacinto
Deputy City Clerk
P:(951)487-7330 ext. 754
#GoSanJacinto I #LifestyleWorthLiving
"CITY HALL IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC ONLY DUE TO THE COVID-19 VIRUS.STAFF IS WORKING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS WITH ALTERED SERVICES.PLEASE VISIT
THE CITY'S WEBSITE FOR MORE DETAILS**
• /Of sAN ,\\
sc
7.4
AC I N TO
From:Susan Larkin [mailto:valleyrestart.susanl@yahoo.com]
Sent:Tuesday, February 2,2021 6:46 PM
To: Espinoza,Julia<jespinoza@sanjacintoca.gov>
Subject:public comment 2.2.21
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of San Jacinto-- DO NOT CLICK on links or
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.]
Hello, I am Susan Larkin, the Grant Administrator for Valley Restart in Hemet. As you look to address
homelessness please include the Valley Restart Outreach team as well as the shelter employees, We
have a lot to offer. 951-766-7476
Susan Larkin
Grants Administrator
951-766-7476
1
951-487-5027 (cell)
www.valleyrestart.info
2
•
Morton, Sherry
From: TEACHER TEACHER <lpurposefamily@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 5:09 PM
To: Morton, Sherry
Subject: Re: Agenda - Feb 2, 2021 (Tue) - City Council
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of San Jacinto -- DO NOT CLICK on links or
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.]
PLEASE READ MY NOTE TO THE CITY COUNCIL. I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND.
We facilitate a bible study every Tuesday, and that makes it hard for me to log into the meetings sometimes. So
I will be sending my messages through email. I want to first start by saying we are always praying for the City
Council. We understand all the things you are responsible for and we appreciate your diligence to serve. I do
want to add that you also campaigned as a candidate, and made lots of promises. Please don't forget the
promises you've made. Don't get into those seats and get so comfortable you turn a blind eye to what's going on
in our city. We have had a large shift in demographics, and if things continue to be glossed over they are soon
enough going to be so out of control you won't be able to get things back on track. Please pay close attention to
the number of street vendors. It has grown exponentially(DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT BESIDE LIP
SERVICE - WHAT IS YOUR ACTION FOR THIS?). Please pay close attention to the number of street racers
who are present throughout the valley(DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT BESIDE LIP SERVICE -WHAT IS
YOUR ACTION FOR THIS?). Please pay close attention to the huge homeless population who are out in the
cold freezing(DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT BESIDE LIP SERVICE - WHAT IS YOUR ACTION FOR
THIS?). I could go on and on with this: dumping up, crime up, gang activity up, drug activity up, stray animals
up, littering up, weeds and overgrowth of trees and shrubs up, holding business responsible for keeping their
areas clean is down, monitoring the "every Saturday morning yard sales" is down, and bringing in businesses to
fill the empty buildings (I won't even mention the building on 5 corners which I am certain is just a tax right for
someone). I have called the city engineer to explain to them that there is something going on with State Street
between Ramona Park Expwy and Idyllwild Dr. I have lived 2 blocks away from there for 21 years and just
recently I can now tell you every time a large vehicle goes down State Street from the sound, and oftentimes
slight trimmers at my house. I guess we'll just have to wait for a huge sinkhole, and lots of lawsuits to occur, in
order to do something about it. Maintenance the last time I checked means to maintain- to sustain-to keep
constant. Is it possible for us to do that instead of waiting for things to be at their worst before we fix it. This is
a city and just like your homes, or your own cars there should be anticipation of what is coming versus waiting
for the storm to be upon us. Sorry to always complain,but believe me when I say I look forward to the day
when I can call and give positive shout outs. I know the day is coming, and I am earnestly looking forward to
it. Thank you for your time. Dei Blythe.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021, 2:57 PM Sherry Morton<NoReplv@igm2.com> wrote:
Please see the attached Agenda document for the following meeting:
City Council
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, February 2, 2021 6:30 PM
Virtual Meeting, San Jacinto, CA 92583
i
Download PDF Agenda I View Web Agenda
Document Modified: 128/202I 2:56 PM
If you no longer wish to be included in this distribution list you can remove yourself through the meeting web portal or reply to this message.
2
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL – REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2021
6:30 PM OPEN SESSION
PUBLIC TELECONFERENCE NUMBER
(951) 465-7684, Conference ID #:860 406 004#
LIVE STREAM LINK: https://bit.ly/2LNIVef
SAN JACINTO CITY HALL
595 S. SAN JACINTO AVE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92583
951-487-4330
City of San Jacinto Page 1 Updated 1/28/2021 2:42 PM
ALONSO LEDEZMA, MAYOR
CRYSTAL RUIZ, MAYOR PRO TEM
JOEL LOPEZ, COUNCILMEMBER
PHIL AYALA, COUNCILMEMBER
BRIAN HAWKINS, COUNCILMEMBER
IMPORTANT MESSAGE REGARDING FEBRUARY 2, 2021 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
***SPECIAL TELECONFERENCING MEETING PROCEDURES***
This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with
State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19
pandemic. The meeting may be joined telephonically by calling (951) 465-7684, Conference ID
#:860 406 004#.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the February
2, 2021, City Council meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the
meeting by the Deputy City Clerk. Email comments to Julia Espinoza at
jespinoza@sanjacintoca.gov. Please put “PUBLIC COMMENT” in the email subject line.
Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be received prior to the time the Mayor calls
the item for Public Comments. Email comments on the agenda items must be received prior to
the time the Mayor closes public comments on the agenda item. All email comments shall be
subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at the Council meeting.
Electronic comments on agenda items for the February 2, 2021, may only be submitted via
email. Comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.
Submission of Public Hearing Comments: Please put “COMMENT FOR PUBLIC
HEARING” in the subject line.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the
reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide,
consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted
shall become part of the record of the Council meeting.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office
of the City Clerk at 951-487-7339. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure
accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].
City of San Jacinto Page 2 Updated 1/28/2021 2:42 PM
1. ORGANIZATION
1.1. Roll Call
1.2. Invocation
1.3. Pledge of Allegiance
1.4. Mayor / Council Member Reports / Discussions
1.5. Late Items
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
3.A. Consent Calendar - City Council
3.A.1. Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading by Title Only
3.A.2. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of January 19, 2021
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the minutes of the January
19, 2021, regular City Council meeting.
Department: City Clerk
3.A.3. Treasurer’s Report at December 31, 2020
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Treasurer’s
Report for the month ending December 31, 2020.
Department: Finance
4. DISCUSSION ITEMS
4.1. Final Local Road Safety Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) for receipt and file.
Department: Engineering
4.2. Ramona Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for
the Ramona Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1; Award the construction
contract to Universal Construction and Engineering for $298,694.23; Allocate
10% of the bid amount for soft costs and 10% of the bid amount for construction
contingencies; reject all other bids; and authorize the City Manager to execute the
City of San Jacinto Page 3 Updated 1/28/2021 2:42 PM
construction contract.
Department: Engineering
5. FUTURE REQUESTS FROM CITY COUNCIL TO STAFF
6. ADJOURNMENT
DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS (SB343) - Any public record, relating to an
open session agenda item, that is distributed within 72 hours prior to the meeting is available for public
inspection at the public counter located in the Administration Building of City Hall, 595 S. San Jacinto
Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583.
I, Julia Espinoza, Deputy City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted
the foregoing agenda this 28th day of January, 2021 as requested by law.
Julia Espinoza, Deputy City Clerk
February 2, 2021
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Sherry Morton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Minutes of January 19, 2021 Regular Meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the minutes of the January 19, 2021, regular
City Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
1-19-21 Regular Meeting Minutes Draft
3.A.2
Packet Pg. 4
ACTION MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY – REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2021
6:30 PM OPEN SESSION – TELEPHONICALLY
(951) 465-7684, Conference ID #:920 995 200#
LIVE STREAM LINK: https://bit.ly/2LNIVef
SAN JACINTO CITY HALL
595 SAN JACINTO AVE.
SAN JACINTO, CA 92583
951-487-7330
1. ORGANIZATION
Mayor Alonzo Ledezma called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m.
1.1. Roll Call
Interim City Clerk Sherry Morton conducted the roll call:
Teleconferenced in: Mayor Alonso Ledezma, Mayor Pro Tem Crystal Ruiz,
Councilmember Phil Ayala, Councilmember Brian Hawkins, Councilmember Joel
Lopez
Absent: None
1.2. Invocation
Councilmember Hawkins gave the Invocation.
1.3. Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by City Treasurer Mike Van Der Linden.
1.4. Special Presentation(s)
There were no special presentations.
ALONSO LEDEZMA, MAYOR
CRYSTAL RUIZ, MAYOR PRO TEM
PHIL AYALA, COUNCILMEMBER
BRIAN HAWKINS, COUNCILMEMBER
JOEL LOPEZ, COUNCILMEMBER
3.A.2.a
Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: 1-19-21 Regular Meeting Minutes Draft (Minutes of January 19, 2021 Regular Meeting)
1.5. Mayor/Council Member Reports/Discussions
Councilmembers provided their reports.
1.5. Late Items
City Manager Rob Johnson introduced a late item regarding a request for a
Temporary Use Permit for an existing storage facility located at 1340 W. Ramona
Expressway to allow for the storage of COVID-related decedents.
The item will be moved to the end of the Discussion Calendar as Agenda Item No.
4.2.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
3. JOINT CONSENT CALENDAR
3.A Consent Calendar – City Council
3.A.1. Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading b y Title Onl y
3.A.2. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of January 5, 2021/City
Clerk/Approved
3.A.3. Warrants and Disbursements - November 2020/Finance/Approved
3.A.4. Treasurer’s Report as of November 2020/Finance/Approved
3.A.5. Approve ORDINANCE NO. 20-14, Levying a Special Tax within
Community Facilities District 2003-1, Including Annexation Territory
(Annexation No. 59)/Finance/Approved
3.A.6. FY 2019-20 Development Impact Fee Report/Finance/Approved
3.A.7. On-Call Professional Planning Services Consultant List through FY 2027 -
28/Community Development/Approved
3.B Consent Calendar – Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency
3.B.1. Confirming and Ratifying the Inclusion of Certain Enforceable Obligations
to San Jacinto Unified School District on the ROPS 21-
22/Finance/Approved
M/S/C (Ledezma/Lopez) moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4/0.
Ayes: Ayala, Ruiz, Lopez, Ledezma
Nays: None
Absent: Hawkins
Abstain: None
3.A.2.a
Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 1-19-21 Regular Meeting Minutes Draft (Minutes of January 19, 2021 Regular Meeting)
4. DISCUSSION ITEMS
4.1. Approval of Awarded Funding to Qualified Businesses for the San Jacinto
Small Business Emergency Grant Program
Economic Development and Special Projects Administrator Tara Magner, presented
the staff report.
M/S/C (Ruiz/Ayala) made a motion to approve the eligible businesses that applied for
the one-time San Jacinto Small Business Emergency Grant Program in the total
amount of $95,000 as listed in the staff report; authorize the City Manager to
administer the individual grants, and execute all necessary documents; and request
staff qualify additional businesses for the remaining San Jacinto Small Business
Emergency Grant Program funds. Motion carried 5/0.
Ayes: Hawkins, Ruiz, Ledezma, Ayala, Lopez
Nays: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
4.2. Late Item - Request for Temporary Use Permit - Storage Facility - 1340 W.
Ramona Expressway
City Attorney Maurer clarified the findings needed to add the item to the agenda (1) the
item arose after the posting of the agenda; and (2) would require immediate Council action.
Mayor Ledezma updated the City Council on the request from Assemblyman Chad Mayes
and Miller Jones Mortuary for a Temporary Use Permit for an existing storage facility
located at 1340 W. Ramona Expressway to allow for storage of COVID-related decedents.
M/S/C (Lopez/Hawkins) made a motion to add to the City Council Agenda the request
for a Temporary Use Permit for an existing storage facility located at 1340 W.
Ramona Expressway to be used for COVID-related decedents. Motion failed 2/3.
Ayes: Hawkins, Lopez
Nays: Ruiz, Ledezma, Ayala
Absent: None
Abstain: None
5. CITY MANAGER UPDATE
City Manager Robert A. Johnson provided updates on the following:
Community Development Department Overview
Planning Division Overview
Building and Safety Division
Code Enforcement Division
Department of Public Utilities – Streets Division
Department of Public Utilities – Parks Division
Department of Public Utilities – Storm Water Division
Department of Public Utilities – Water Division
3.A.2.a
Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 1-19-21 Regular Meeting Minutes Draft (Minutes of January 19, 2021 Regular Meeting)
Department of Public Utilities – Waste Water Division
City Manager’s Office Overview
6. FUTURE REQUESTS FROM CITY COUNCIL TO STAFF
Councilmember Ayala requested staff work with the previously disqualified applicants to
assist them with qualifying for the Small Business Emergency Grant Program and to
expand the Programs outreach.
Councilmember Hawkins requested staff look into allowing food trucks to operate within
the City.
7. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business before the City Council, Mayor Ledezma called for a moment of
silence in honor of former City Manager Jim Conner, and adjourned the Regular Meeting
of the City Council at 8:10 pm.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
________________________
Alonso Ledezma, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Sherry Morton, MMC
Interim City Clerk
Approved as read:
Approved as amended:
3.A.2.a
Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: 1-19-21 Regular Meeting Minutes Draft (Minutes of January 19, 2021 Regular Meeting)
February 2, 2021
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Tom Prill, Deputy City Manager
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Treasurer’s Report at December 31, 2020
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Treasurer’s Report for the month
ending December 31, 2020.
BACKGROUND:
The Treasurer’s Report is required to be presented to the governing body at least quarterly in
accordance with California Government Code Section 53600 et. seq.
DISCUSSION:
Total Cash and City Investments decreased 1.87% during the month. This includes cash, cash in
bank and cash with trustee.
The attached Treasurer’s report is a “snapshot” report of our cash position on the last day of the
month in all of our accounts. A section demonstrating compliance with the adopted Investment
Policy and a chart depicting historical interest rates for certain positions is also included.
Detailed statements of investments from Chandler Asset Management and Public Trust Advisors
have also been included.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature
3.A.3
Packet Pg. 9
3.A.3.aPacket Pg. 10Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
3.A.3.aPacket Pg. 11Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
- 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.0001/182/183/184/185/186/187/188/189/1810/1811/1812/181/192/193/194/195/196/197/198/199/1910/1911/1912/191/202/203/204/205/206/207/208/209/2010/2011/2012/20Interest Rates - 1/18 to 12/20LAIFLAMMA-BoHMMA-RaboPIMMA-RaboChandlerPTA3.A.3.aPacket Pg. 12Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
MONTHLY ACCOUNT STATEMENT
City of San Jacinto - Account #10167
DECEMBER 1, 2020 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2020
Information contained herein is confidential. We urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Please see Important Disclosures.
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT
chandlerasset.com
Chandler Team:
For questions about your account, please call (800) 317-4747,
or contact operations@chandlerasset.com
Custodian
US Bank
Christopher Isles
(503) 464-3685
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
ACCOUNT SUMMARY
Beg. Values
as of 11/30/20
End Values
as of 12/31/20
Market Value 11,287,567 11,307,197
Accrued Interest 54,330 49,411
Total Market Value 11,341,897 11,356,608
Income Earned 16,295 16,130
Cont/WD -1,049
Par 10,895,856 10,918,567
Book Value 10,952,545 10,974,552
Cost Value 10,948,633 10,971,532
TOP ISSUERS
Government of United States 28.7%
Federal National Mortgage Assoc 20.0%
Federal Home Loan Bank 19.0%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 9.0%
Apple Inc 1.9%
Honda ABS 1.8%
Oracle Corp 1.8%
Wal-Mart Stores 1.8%
Total 83.9%
PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
Average Modified Duration 2.56
Average Coupon 1.83%
Average Purchase YTM 1.72%
Average Market YTM 0.24%
Average S&P/Moody Rating AA+/Aa1
Average Final Maturity 2.72 yrs
Average Life 2.63 yrs
CREDIT QUALITY (S&P)MATURITY DISTRIBUTIONSECTOR ALLOCATION
Portfolio Summary
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Annualized
TOTAL RATE OF RETURN 1M 3M YTD 1YR 2YRS 3YRS 5YRS 10YRS 6/30/2012
City of San Jacinto 0.14%0.16%4.08%4.08%3.98%3.22%2.33%N/A 1.62%
City of San Jacinto 1-5 Year Govt Blended Index*0.07%0.03%3.28%3.28%3.41%2.80%1.94%N/A 1.35%
City of San Jacinto 1-5 Yr Corp/Gov AAA-A Blend**0.10%0.10%3.29%3.29%3.55%2.91%2.10%N/A 1.53%
*ICE BAML 1-3 Yr US Treasury Index to 3/31/2020; then ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency thereafter.
**ICE BAML 1-3 Yr US Corp/Govt Rated AAA-A Index to 3/31/2020; then ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Corp/Govt Rated AAA-A Index thereafter.
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 1
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Category Standard Comment
Municipal Securities "A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer Complies
Treasury Issues No Limitation Complies
Agency Issues No Limitation Complies
Supranationals
"AA" rated or better by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 10% max per issuer; U.S. dollar denominated senior unsecured
unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development ("IBRD"), the International Finance Corporation ("IFC") or the Inter-American Development Bank ("IADB")
Complies
Banker’s Acceptances "A-1" short term debt rated or higher by at least two NRSROs; and "A" long-term debt rated or higher by at least two
NRSROs; 40% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 180 days max maturity Complies
Commercial Paper
"A-1" short term debt rated or higher by at least two NRSROs; and "A" long-term debt rated or higher by at least two
NRSROs; 25% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 270 days max maturity; Issuer is a corporation organized and operating in the
U.S. with assets > $500 million
Complies
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit "A" long-term issuer rated category or higher by at least two NRSROs; and/or "A-1" short term rated or higher by at least two
NRSROs; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer Complies
Federally Insured Certificates of Deposit
(CDs)/ Time Deposit (TDs)
20% maximum (combined FDIC insured and collateralized TD/ CD); Amount per institution is limited to maximum covered
under federal insurance Complies
Collateralized Certificates of Deposit
(CDs)/Time Deposit (TDs)/
"A" long-term debt rated category or higher by at least two NRSROs; and/or "A-1" short term debt rated or higher by at least
two NRSROs; 20% maximum (combined FDIC and collateralized TD/ CD)Complies
Corporate Medium Term Notes "A" rated category or better by at least two NRSROs; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; Issued by corporations organized
and operating within the U.S. or by depository institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating within the U.S. Complies
Mutual Fund & Money Market Mutual
Fund
Highest rating or "AAA" rated by two NRSROs; SEC registered adviser with AUM >$500 million and experience > 5 years; 20%
maximum in Mutual Funds and Money Market Mutual Funds; 10% max per one Mutual Fund; 20% max in Money Market
Mutual Fund
Complies
Asset-Backed (ABS), Mortgage-Backed
Securities; Mortgage Pass-Throughs;
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
(CMOs)
"AA" rated category or better by at least two NRSROs; "A" issuer debt rated category or higher by at least two NRSROs; 20%
maximum; 5% max per issuer Complies
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)70% of the portfolio may be invested in LAIF, up to the maximum permitted balance; Not used by investment adviser Complies
Local Government Investment Pools and
Joint Powers Authority Pools
Riverside County Investment Fund- 70% max of the total portfolio
JPA Pools- 50% max of the total portfolio
Repurchase Agreements 102% collateralized; 1 year max maturity Complies
Prohibited Securities Inverse floaters; Ranges notes, Interest-only strips from mortgaged backed securities; Zero interest accrual securities; Margin
purchasing or selling; Reverse repurchase agreements; Foreign currency denominated securities Complies
Max Callables 20% maximum callable securities (does not include "make whole call" securities)Complies
Max Per Issuer 5% of portfolio per issuer (except U.S. Government, its Agencies and enterprises, Money Market Mutual Funds, Mutual
Funds, LAIF, LGIP, Supranationals, or unless otherwise specified in the investment policy)Complies
Maximum maturity 5 years Complies
City of San Jacinto
As of December 31, 2020
Assets managed by Chandler Asset Management are in full compliance with state law and with the City's investment policy.
Statement of Compliance
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31, 2020)
BOOK VALUE RECONCILIATION
BEGINNING BOOK VALUE $10,952,545.26
Acquisition
+ Security Purchases $240,018.75
+ Money Market Fund Purchases $154,937.19
+ Money Market Contributions $0.00
+ Security Contributions $0.00
+ Security Transfers $0.00
Total Acquisitions $394,955.94
Dispositions
- Security Sales $201,750.00
- Money Market Fund Sales $38,132.49
- MMF Withdrawals $1,048.85
- Security Withdrawals $0.00
- Security Transfers $0.00
- Other Dispositions $0.00
- Maturites $0.00
- Calls $125,000.00
- Principal Paydowns $8,044.56
Total Dispositions $373,975.90
Amortization/Accretion
+/- Net Accretion ($980.38)
($980.38)
Gain/Loss on Dispositions
+/- Realized Gain/Loss $2,006.99
$2,006.99
ENDING BOOK VALUE $10,974,551.91
CASH TRANSACTION SUMMARY
BEGINNING BALANCE $39,349.53
Acquisition
Contributions $0.00
Security Sale Proceeds $201,750.00
Accrued Interest Received $175.82
Interest Received $20,668.46
Dividend Received $0.21
Principal on Maturities $0.00
Interest on Maturities $0.00
Calls/Redemption (Principal)$125,000.00
Interest from Calls/Redemption $1,223.96
Principal Paydown $8,044.56
Total Acquisitions $356,863.01
Dispositions
Withdrawals $1,048.85
Security Purchase $240,018.75
Accrued Interest Paid $39.56
Total Dispositions $241,107.16
ENDING BOOK VALUE $155,105.38
Reconciliation Summary
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto California
Account #10167
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 3
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Holdings Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
89238KAD4 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D
A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
11,870.95 10/17/2019
1.97%
11,868.17
11,869.65
100.19
0.19%
11,894.04
8.27
0.10%
24.39
Aaa / AAA
NR
1.05
0.11
43815HAC1 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3
A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
31,590.83 08/21/2018
2.98%
31,586.50
31,589.05
101.18
0.17%
31,965.02
25.89
0.28%
375.97
Aaa / NR
AAA
1.64
0.43
43815NAC8 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3
A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
80,000.00 08/20/2019
1.79%
79,999.34
79,999.63
101.63
0.30%
81,305.84
63.29
0.72%
1,306.21
Aaa / AAA
NR
2.62
1.09
477870AC3 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
40,000.00 07/16/2019
2.23%
39,991.51
39,994.30
101.93
0.17%
40,772.00
39.29
0.36%
777.70
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.96
0.94
65479JAD5 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C
A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
85,000.00 10/16/2019
1.94%
84,995.51
84,996.64
102.04
0.43%
86,733.58
72.91
0.76%
1,736.94
Aaa / AAA
NR
3.54
1.35
47789KAC7 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
60,000.00 03/04/2020
1.11%
59,996.33
59,997.00
101.25
0.30%
60,752.76
29.33
0.54%
755.76
Aaa / NR
AAA
3.62
1.56
89237VAB5 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C
A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
55,000.00 07/21/2020
0.44%
54,995.77
54,996.20
100.35
0.23%
55,192.94
10.76
0.49%
196.74
Aaa / AAA
NR
3.79
1.66
43813KAC6 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3
A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
90,000.00 09/22/2020
0.38%
89,986.78
89,987.87
100.17
0.29%
90,152.19
12.03
0.79%
164.32
NR / AAA
AAA
3.80
2.01
47787NAC3 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
25,000.00 07/14/2020
0.52%
24,996.19
24,996.68
100.32
0.34%
25,080.38
5.67
0.22%
83.70
Aaa / NR
AAA
3.88
1.87
89236XAC0 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
45,000.00 10/06/2020
0.36%
44,991.62
44,992.05
99.98
0.36%
44,992.05
7.00
0.40%
0.00
NR / AAA
AAA
4.04
1.94
Total ABS 523,461.78 1.28%
523,407.72
523,419.07 0.30%
528,840.80
274.44
4.66%
5,421.73
Aaa / AAA
AAA
3.32
1.44
AGENCY
3130A7CV5 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 2/18/2021
175,000.00 03/10/2016
1.61%
173,085.50
174,949.09
100.16
0.18%
175,273.53
888.98
1.55%
324.44
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.13
0.13
3135G0N82 FNMA Note
1.25% Due 8/17/2021
315,000.00 01/26/2017
2.02%
304,579.80
313,567.93
100.72
0.11%
317,255.40
1,465.63
2.81%
3,687.47
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.63
0.62
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 4
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Holdings Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
AGENCY
313378WG2 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 3/11/2022
300,000.00 03/13/2018
2.65%
298,323.00
299,500.81
102.83
0.13%
308,490.60
2,291.67
2.74%
8,989.79
Aaa / AA+
NR
1.19
1.18
313379Q69 FHLB Note
2.125% Due 6/10/2022
200,000.00 06/20/2017
1.87%
202,370.00
200,685.54
102.89
0.12%
205,772.40
247.92
1.81%
5,086.86
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.44
1.43
3135G0W33 FNMA Note
1.375% Due 9/6/2022
200,000.00 09/05/2019
1.49%
199,304.00
199,610.72
102.13
0.11%
204,255.80
878.47
1.81%
4,645.08
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.68
1.66
3130A3KM5 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 12/9/2022
100,000.00 09/10/2019
1.60%
102,813.00
101,681.14
104.54
0.15%
104,541.90
152.78
0.92%
2,860.76
Aaa / AA+
NR
1.94
1.90
3135G0T94 FNMA Note
2.375% Due 1/19/2023
290,000.00 10/17/2018
3.07%
281,993.10
286,143.49
104.58
0.14%
303,282.29
3,099.38
2.70%
17,138.80
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.05
1.99
3137EAEN5 FHLMC Note
2.75% Due 6/19/2023
200,000.00 11/13/2018
3.08%
197,176.00
198,487.02
106.32
0.18%
212,634.20
183.33
1.87%
14,147.18
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.47
2.40
313383YJ4 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 9/8/2023
200,000.00 12/27/2018
2.73%
205,630.00
203,217.14
108.55
0.18%
217,105.80
2,118.75
1.93%
13,888.66
Aaa / AA+
NR
2.69
2.57
3137EAEY1 FHLMC Note
0.125% Due 10/16/2023
180,000.00 10/22/2020
0.26%
179,253.00
179,301.06
99.93
0.15%
179,876.88
46.88
1.58%
575.82
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.79
2.78
3130A0F70 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 12/8/2023
220,000.00 01/30/2019
2.71%
226,593.40
223,985.06
109.25
0.21%
240,355.28
474.38
2.12%
16,370.22
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.94
2.82
3135G0V34 FNMA Note
2.5% Due 2/5/2024
375,000.00 03/24/2020
0.82%
398,835.00
394,074.75
107.11
0.20%
401,649.00
3,802.08
3.57%
7,574.25
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.10
2.97
3130A1XJ2 FHLB Note
2.875% Due 6/14/2024
210,000.00 Various
1.96%
219,055.20
216,258.68
109.16
0.21%
229,229.92
285.10
2.02%
12,971.24
Aaa / AA+
NR
3.45
3.31
3130A2UW4 FHLB Note
2.875% Due 9/13/2024
150,000.00 10/29/2019
1.76%
157,737.00
155,872.30
109.67
0.25%
164,502.45
1,293.75
1.46%
8,630.15
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.70
3.51
3130A3GE8 FHLB Note
2.75% Due 12/13/2024
250,000.00 12/16/2019
1.77%
261,672.50
259,232.99
109.52
0.32%
273,812.00
343.75
2.41%
14,579.01
Aaa / AA+
NR
3.95
3.77
3135G0X24 FNMA Note
1.625% Due 1/7/2025
225,000.00 01/16/2020
1.69%
224,298.00
224,433.22
105.38
0.28%
237,097.80
1,767.19
2.10%
12,664.58
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.02
3.87
3137EAEP0 FHLMC Note
1.5% Due 2/12/2025
245,000.00 02/13/2020
1.52%
244,811.35
244,844.64
104.90
0.30%
257,011.86
1,418.96
2.28%
12,167.22
Aaa / NR
AAA
4.12
3.98
3135G03U5 FNMA Note
0.625% Due 4/22/2025
310,000.00 Various
0.63%
309,949.40
309,964.15
101.18
0.35%
313,644.05
371.35
2.77%
3,679.90
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.31
4.25
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 5
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Holdings Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
AGENCY
3130AJKW8 FHLB Note
0.5% Due 6/13/2025
225,000.00 06/24/2020
0.52%
224,824.50
224,842.88
100.61
0.36%
226,364.85
56.25
1.99%
1,521.97
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.45
4.40
3137EAEU9 FHLMC Note
0.375% Due 7/21/2025
145,000.00 07/21/2020
0.48%
144,277.90
144,342.03
100.05
0.36%
145,076.56
238.65
1.28%
734.53
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.56
4.51
3135G05X7 FNMA Note
0.375% Due 8/25/2025
230,000.00 08/25/2020
0.47%
228,923.60
228,998.55
99.98
0.38%
229,949.63
297.08
2.03%
951.08
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.65
4.60
3137EAEX3 FHLMC Note
0.375% Due 9/23/2025
230,000.00 09/23/2020
0.44%
229,307.70
229,344.90
99.83
0.41%
229,617.28
230.00
2.02%
272.38
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.73
4.68
3135G06G3 FNMA Note
0.5% Due 11/7/2025
250,000.00 11/09/2020
0.57%
249,105.00
249,129.57
100.42
0.41%
251,045.75
170.14
2.21%
1,916.18
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.85
4.78
Total Agency 5,225,000.00 1.56%
5,263,917.95
5,262,467.66 0.24%
5,427,845.23
22,122.47
47.99%
165,377.57
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.04
2.96
CORPORATE
17275RBD3 Cisco Systems Note
2.2% Due 2/28/2021
150,000.00 09/20/2017
1.98%
151,108.50
150,051.23
100.31
0.27%
150,466.50
1,127.50
1.33%
415.27
A1 / AA-
NR
0.16
0.16
369550BE7 General Dynamics Corp Note
3% Due 5/11/2021
125,000.00 05/15/2018
3.25%
124,128.75
124,895.99
100.96
0.33%
126,204.13
520.83
1.12%
1,308.14
A2 / A
NR
0.36
0.36
808513AW5 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note
Cont 4/21/2021
3.25% Due 5/21/2021
150,000.00 05/30/2018
3.01%
151,011.00
150,105.41
100.90
0.31%
151,342.95
541.67
1.34%
1,237.54
A2 / A
A
0.39
0.31
931142EJ8 Wal-Mart Stores Note
3.125% Due 6/23/2021
200,000.00 Various
2.96%
200,929.00
200,148.79
101.37
0.25%
202,741.20
138.89
1.79%
2,592.41
Aa2 / AA
AA
0.48
0.48
68389XBK0 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont
8/15/2021
1.9% Due 9/15/2021
200,000.00 10/12/2017
2.11%
198,458.00
199,722.87
101.01
0.28%
202,014.00
1,118.89
1.79%
2,291.13
A3 / A
A-
0.71
0.62
89236TDP7 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note
2.6% Due 1/11/2022
130,000.00 01/28/2019
2.98%
128,629.80
129,522.91
102.36
0.30%
133,066.31
1,596.11
1.19%
3,543.40
A1 / A+
A+
1.03
1.01
06051GEU9 Bank of America Corp Note
3.3% Due 1/11/2023
130,000.00 01/28/2019
3.29%
130,059.80
130,030.69
106.02
0.32%
137,827.30
2,025.83
1.23%
7,796.61
A2 / A-
A+
2.03
1.95
06406RAE7 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Callable Note
Cont 12/29/2022
2.95% Due 1/29/2023
145,000.00 09/09/2019
1.97%
149,541.40
147,739.92
105.19
0.34%
152,520.57
1,806.06
1.36%
4,780.65
A1 / A
AA-
2.08
1.93
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 6
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Holdings Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
CORPORATE
084670BR8 Berkshire Hathaway Callable Note Cont
1/15/2023
2.75% Due 3/15/2023
150,000.00 08/26/2019
1.83%
154,525.50
152,724.09
105.02
0.28%
157,524.30
1,214.58
1.40%
4,800.21
Aa2 / AA
A+
2.20
1.98
037833AK6 Apple Inc Note
2.4% Due 5/3/2023
200,000.00 05/20/2019
2.63%
198,284.00
198,986.11
104.90
0.30%
209,792.80
773.33
1.85%
10,806.69
Aa1 / AA+
NR
2.34
2.28
24422EUR8 John Deere Capital Corp Note
3.45% Due 1/10/2024
150,000.00 03/14/2019
2.95%
153,322.50
152,085.30
109.05
0.44%
163,567.50
2,458.13
1.46%
11,482.20
A2 / A
A
3.03
2.86
46625HJX9 JP Morgan Chase Note
3.625% Due 5/13/2024
145,000.00 12/19/2019
2.20%
153,560.80
151,562.21
110.57
0.46%
160,321.43
700.83
1.42%
8,759.22
A2 / A-
AA-
3.37
3.19
Total Corporate 1,875,000.00 2.57%
1,893,559.05
1,887,575.52 0.32%
1,947,388.99
14,022.65
17.27%
59,813.47
A1 / A+
A+
1.53
1.44
MONEY MARKET FUND FI
31846V203 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
155,105.38 Various
0.01%
155,105.38
155,105.38
1.00
0.01%
155,105.38
0.00
1.37%
0.00
Aaa / AAA
AAA
0.00
0.00
Total Money Market Fund FI 155,105.38 0.01%
155,105.38
155,105.38 0.01%
155,105.38
0.00
1.37%
0.00
Aaa / AAA
AAA
0.00
0.00
US TREASURY
912828S76 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 7/31/2021
100,000.00 11/29/2017
1.98%
96,988.28
99,525.41
100.59
0.12%
100,585.90
470.79
0.89%
1,060.49
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.58
0.58
912828T34 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 9/30/2021
125,000.00 05/30/2018
2.59%
119,194.34
123,703.50
100.75
0.12%
125,942.38
359.29
1.11%
2,238.88
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.75
0.74
912828G53 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 11/30/2021
220,000.00 04/26/2017
1.81%
220,653.86
220,129.76
101.61
0.12%
223,532.10
362.64
1.97%
3,402.34
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.92
0.91
912828W89 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 3/31/2022
200,000.00 04/26/2018
2.75%
193,531.25
197,952.01
102.19
0.12%
204,375.00
958.10
1.81%
6,422.99
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.25
1.23
912828L24 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 8/31/2022
150,000.00 07/22/2019
1.77%
150,462.89
150,247.55
102.90
0.13%
154,347.60
955.63
1.37%
4,100.05
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.67
1.63
912828M80 US Treasury Note
2% Due 11/30/2022
200,000.00 04/11/2019
2.31%
197,851.56
198,868.22
103.58
0.13%
207,164.00
351.65
1.83%
8,295.78
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.92
1.88
9128284D9 US Treasury Note
2.5% Due 3/31/2023
210,000.00 Various
2.95%
206,053.12
208,033.79
105.30
0.14%
221,123.49
1,341.34
1.96%
13,089.70
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.25
2.19
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 7
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Holdings Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
US TREASURY
912828Y61 US Treasury Note
2.75% Due 7/31/2023
175,000.00 12/27/2018
2.59%
176,223.63
175,687.01
106.70
0.15%
186,716.78
2,013.93
1.66%
11,029.77
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.58
2.49
912828W71 US Treasury Note
2.125% Due 3/31/2024
210,000.00 12/05/2019
1.63%
214,331.25
213,254.62
106.25
0.19%
223,116.81
1,140.14
1.97%
9,862.19
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.25
3.14
912828Y87 US Treasury Note
1.75% Due 7/31/2024
220,000.00 01/17/2020
1.63%
221,160.16
220,917.32
105.48
0.22%
232,048.52
1,611.14
2.06%
11,131.20
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.58
3.47
9128282U3 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 8/31/2024
230,000.00 12/12/2019
1.76%
231,230.86
230,955.83
106.03
0.22%
243,871.76
1,465.30
2.16%
12,915.93
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.67
3.54
912828YV6 US Treasury Note
1.5% Due 11/30/2024
230,000.00 12/12/2019
1.74%
227,421.48
227,968.74
104.86
0.25%
241,185.59
303.30
2.13%
13,216.85
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.92
3.81
912828ZC7 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 2/28/2025
400,000.00 03/24/2020
0.51%
412,046.88
410,160.58
103.53
0.27%
414,109.20
1,529.01
3.66%
3,948.62
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.16
4.06
912828ZT0 US Treasury Note
0.25% Due 5/31/2025
230,000.00 06/04/2020
0.39%
228,373.83
228,561.36
99.81
0.29%
229,559.78
50.55
2.02%
998.42
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.42
4.39
91282CAZ4 US Treasury Note
0.375% Due 11/30/2025
240,000.00 12/15/2020
0.37%
240,018.75
240,018.58
100.14
0.35%
240,337.44
79.12
2.12%
318.86
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.92
4.86
Total US Treasury 3,140,000.00 1.64%
3,135,542.14
3,145,984.28 0.20%
3,248,016.35
12,991.93
28.71%
102,032.07
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.94
2.88
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 10,918,567.16 1.72%
10,971,532.24
10,974,551.91 0.24%
11,307,196.75
49,411.49
100.00%
332,644.84
Aa1 / AA+
AAA
2.72
2.56
TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUED 11,356,608.24
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 8
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Transaction Ledger
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp
Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 12/01/2020 31846V203 0.18 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%0.18 0.00 0.18 0.00
Purchase 12/08/2020 31846V203 3,712.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%3,712.50 0.00 3,712.50 0.00
Purchase 12/09/2020 31846V203 1,250.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 0.00
Purchase 12/10/2020 31846V203 2,125.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%2,125.00 0.00 2,125.00 0.00
Purchase 12/13/2020 31846V203 4,118.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%4,118.75 0.00 4,118.75 0.00
Purchase 12/14/2020 31846V203 3,018.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%3,018.75 0.00 3,018.75 0.00
Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 118.67 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%118.67 0.00 118.67 0.00
Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 73.67 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%73.67 0.00 73.67 0.00
Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 20.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%20.17 0.00 20.17 0.00
Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 13.13 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%13.13 0.00 13.13 0.00
Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 136.71 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%136.71 0.00 136.71 0.00
Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 55.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00
Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 10.63 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%10.63 0.00 10.63 0.00
Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 4,496.47 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%4,496.47 0.00 4,496.47 0.00
Purchase 12/16/2020 91282CAZ4 240,000.00 US Treasury Note
0.375% Due 11/30/2025
100.008 0.37%240,018.75 39.56 240,058.31 0.00
Purchase 12/18/2020 31846V203 27.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%27.75 0.00 27.75 0.00
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 9
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Transaction Ledger
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp
Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 12/19/2020 31846V203 2,750.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%2,750.00 0.00 2,750.00 0.00
Purchase 12/21/2020 31846V203 3,660.82 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%3,660.82 0.00 3,660.82 0.00
Purchase 12/23/2020 31846V203 3,125.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%3,125.00 0.00 3,125.00 0.00
Purchase 12/29/2020 31846V203 126,223.96 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%126,223.96 0.00 126,223.96 0.00
Purchase 12/29/2020 31846V203 0.03 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00
Subtotal 394,937.19 394,955.94 39.56 394,995.50 0.00
TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 394,937.19 394,955.94 39.56 394,995.50 0.00
DISPOSITIONS
Sale 12/16/2020 31846V203 38,132.49 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 0.01%38,132.49 0.00 38,132.49 0.00
Sale 12/16/2020 912828WN6 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
2% Due 5/31/2021
100.875 2.29%201,750.00 175.82 201,925.82 2,006.99
Subtotal 238,132.49 239,882.49 175.82 240,058.31 2,006.99
Call 12/29/2020 91159HHL7 125,000.00 US Bancorp Callable Note 1X
12/29/2020
2.35% Due 1/29/2021
100.000 2.12%125,000.00 1,223.96 126,223.96 0.00
Subtotal 125,000.00 125,000.00 1,223.96 126,223.96 0.00
Paydown 12/15/2020 43815NAC8 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3
A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
100.000 0.00 118.67 118.67 0.00
Paydown 12/15/2020 477870AC3 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
100.000 0.00 73.67 73.67 0.00
Paydown 12/15/2020 47787NAC3 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
100.000 0.00 10.63 10.63 0.00
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Transaction Ledger
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp
Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
DISPOSITIONS
Paydown 12/15/2020 47789KAC7 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
100.000 0.00 55.00 55.00 0.00
Paydown 12/15/2020 65479JAD5 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C
A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
100.000 0.00 136.71 136.71 0.00
Paydown 12/15/2020 89236XAC0 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
100.000 0.00 13.13 13.13 0.00
Paydown 12/15/2020 89237VAB5 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C
A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
100.000 0.00 20.17 20.17 0.00
Paydown 12/15/2020 89238KAD4 4,470.19 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D
A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
100.000 4,470.19 26.28 4,496.47 0.00
Paydown 12/18/2020 43813KAC6 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3
A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
100.000 0.00 27.75 27.75 0.00
Paydown 12/21/2020 43815HAC1 3,574.37 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3
A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
100.000 3,574.37 86.45 3,660.82 0.00
Subtotal 8,044.56 8,044.56 568.46 8,613.02 0.00
Security
Withdrawal
12/04/2020 31846V203 944.68 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 944.68 0.00 944.68 0.00
Security
Withdrawal
12/24/2020 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00
Subtotal 1,048.85 1,048.85 0.00 1,048.85 0.00
TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 372,225.90 373,975.90 1,968.24 375,944.14 2,006.99
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Interest 12/08/2020 3130A0F70 220,000.00 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 12/8/2023
0.000 3,712.50 0.00 3,712.50 0.00
Interest 12/09/2020 3130A3KM5 100,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 12/9/2022
0.000 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 0.00
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Transaction Ledger
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp
Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Interest 12/10/2020 313379Q69 200,000.00 FHLB Note
2.125% Due 6/10/2022
0.000 2,125.00 0.00 2,125.00 0.00
Interest 12/13/2020 3130A3GE8 250,000.00 FHLB Note
2.75% Due 12/13/2024
0.000 3,437.50 0.00 3,437.50 0.00
Interest 12/13/2020 3130AJKW8 225,000.00 FHLB Note
0.5% Due 6/13/2025
0.000 681.25 0.00 681.25 0.00
Interest 12/14/2020 3130A1XJ2 210,000.00 FHLB Note
2.875% Due 6/14/2024
0.000 3,018.75 0.00 3,018.75 0.00
Interest 12/19/2020 3137EAEN5 200,000.00 FHLMC Note
2.75% Due 6/19/2023
0.000 2,750.00 0.00 2,750.00 0.00
Interest 12/23/2020 931142EJ8 200,000.00 Wal-Mart Stores Note
3.125% Due 6/23/2021
0.000 3,125.00 0.00 3,125.00 0.00
Subtotal 1,605,000.00 20,100.00 0.00 20,100.00 0.00
Dividend 12/01/2020 31846V203 39,349.53 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
0.000 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.00
Dividend 12/29/2020 31846V203 28,881.39 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
0.000 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00
Subtotal 68,230.92 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.00
TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 1,673,230.92 20,100.21 0.00 20,100.21 0.00
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Income Earned
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
FIXED INCOME
037833AK6 Apple Inc
Note
2.4% Due 05/03/2023
05/20/2019
05/22/2019
200,000.00
198,949.22
0.00
0.00
198,986.11
373.33
0.00
773.33
400.00
36.89
0.00
36.89
436.89
436.89
06051GEU9 Bank of America Corp
Note
3.3% Due 01/11/2023
01/28/2019
01/30/2019
130,000.00
130,031.97
0.00
0.00
130,030.69
1,668.33
0.00
2,025.83
357.50
0.00
1.28
(1.28)
356.22
356.22
06406RAE7 Bank of NY Mellon Corp
Callable Note Cont 12/29/2022
2.95% Due 01/29/2023
09/09/2019
09/11/2019
145,000.00
147,856.75
0.00
0.00
147,739.92
1,449.60
0.00
1,806.06
356.46
0.00
116.83
(116.83)
239.63
239.63
084670BR8 Berkshire Hathaway
Callable Note Cont 1/15/2023
2.75% Due 03/15/2023
08/26/2019
08/28/2019
150,000.00
152,837.59
0.00
0.00
152,724.09
870.83
0.00
1,214.58
343.75
0.00
113.50
(113.50)
230.25
230.25
17275RBD3 Cisco Systems
Note
2.2% Due 02/28/2021
09/20/2017
09/22/2017
150,000.00
150,078.61
0.00
0.00
150,051.23
852.50
0.00
1,127.50
275.00
0.00
27.38
(27.38)
247.62
247.62
24422EUR8 John Deere Capital Corp
Note
3.45% Due 01/10/2024
03/14/2019
03/18/2019
150,000.00
152,143.85
0.00
0.00
152,085.30
2,026.88
0.00
2,458.13
431.25
0.00
58.55
(58.55)
372.70
372.70
3130A0F70 FHLB
Note
3.375% Due 12/08/2023
01/30/2019
01/31/2019
220,000.00
224,100.41
0.00
0.00
223,985.06
3,568.13
3,712.50
474.38
618.75
0.00
115.35
(115.35)
503.40
503.40
3130A1XJ2 FHLB
Note
2.875% Due 06/14/2024
Various
Various
210,000.00
216,412.66
0.00
0.00
216,258.68
2,800.72
3,018.75
285.10
503.13
0.00
153.98
(153.98)
349.15
349.15
3130A2UW4 FHLB
Note
2.875% Due 09/13/2024
10/29/2019
10/30/2019
150,000.00
156,007.04
0.00
0.00
155,872.30
934.38
0.00
1,293.75
359.37
0.00
134.74
(134.74)
224.63
224.63
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Income Earned
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
3130A3GE8 FHLB
Note
2.75% Due 12/13/2024
12/16/2019
12/17/2019
250,000.00
259,431.48
0.00
0.00
259,232.99
3,208.33
3,437.50
343.75
572.92
0.00
198.49
(198.49)
374.43
374.43
3130A3KM5 FHLB
Note
2.5% Due 12/09/2022
09/10/2019
09/13/2019
100,000.00
101,754.86
0.00
0.00
101,681.14
1,194.44
1,250.00
152.78
208.34
0.00
73.72
(73.72)
134.62
134.62
3130A7CV5 FHLB
Note
1.375% Due 02/18/2021
03/10/2016
03/11/2016
175,000.00
174,916.21
0.00
0.00
174,949.09
688.45
0.00
888.98
200.53
32.88
0.00
32.88
233.41
233.41
3130AJKW8 FHLB
Note
0.5% Due 06/13/2025
06/24/2020
06/25/2020
225,000.00
224,839.88
0.00
0.00
224,842.88
643.75
681.25
56.25
93.75
3.00
0.00
3.00
96.75
96.75
313378WG2 FHLB
Note
2.5% Due 03/11/2022
03/13/2018
03/14/2018
300,000.00
299,465.15
0.00
0.00
299,500.81
1,666.67
0.00
2,291.67
625.00
35.66
0.00
35.66
660.66
660.66
313379Q69 FHLB
Note
2.125% Due 06/10/2022
06/20/2017
06/21/2017
200,000.00
200,726.02
0.00
0.00
200,685.54
2,018.75
2,125.00
247.92
354.17
0.00
40.48
(40.48)
313.69
313.69
313383YJ4 FHLB
Note
3.375% Due 09/08/2023
12/27/2018
12/28/2018
200,000.00
203,318.91
0.00
0.00
203,217.14
1,556.25
0.00
2,118.75
562.50
0.00
101.77
(101.77)
460.73
460.73
3135G03U5 FNMA
Note
0.625% Due 04/22/2025
Various
Various
310,000.00
309,963.44
0.00
0.00
309,964.15
209.90
0.00
371.35
161.45
7.36
6.65
0.71
162.16
162.16
3135G05X7 FNMA
Note
0.375% Due 08/25/2025
08/25/2020
08/27/2020
230,000.00
228,980.25
0.00
0.00
228,998.55
225.21
0.00
297.08
71.87
18.30
0.00
18.30
90.17
90.17
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Income Earned
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
3135G06G3 FNMA
Note
0.5% Due 11/07/2025
11/09/2020
11/12/2020
250,000.00
249,114.34
0.00
0.00
249,129.57
65.97
0.00
170.14
104.17
15.23
0.00
15.23
119.40
119.40
3135G0N82 FNMA
Note
1.25% Due 08/17/2021
01/26/2017
01/31/2017
315,000.00
313,373.22
0.00
0.00
313,567.93
1,137.50
0.00
1,465.63
328.13
194.71
0.00
194.71
522.84
522.84
3135G0T94 FNMA
Note
2.375% Due 01/19/2023
10/17/2018
10/19/2018
290,000.00
285,983.66
0.00
0.00
286,143.49
2,525.42
0.00
3,099.38
573.96
159.83
0.00
159.83
733.79
733.79
3135G0V34 FNMA
Note
2.5% Due 02/05/2024
03/24/2020
03/25/2020
375,000.00
394,598.04
0.00
0.00
394,074.75
3,020.83
0.00
3,802.08
781.25
0.00
523.29
(523.29)
257.96
257.96
3135G0W33 FNMA
Note
1.375% Due 09/06/2022
09/05/2019
09/06/2019
200,000.00
199,591.04
0.00
0.00
199,610.72
649.31
0.00
878.47
229.16
19.68
0.00
19.68
248.84
248.84
3135G0X24 FNMA
Note
1.625% Due 01/07/2025
01/16/2020
01/17/2020
225,000.00
224,421.25
0.00
0.00
224,433.22
1,462.50
0.00
1,767.19
304.69
11.97
0.00
11.97
316.66
316.66
3137EAEN5 FHLMC
Note
2.75% Due 06/19/2023
11/13/2018
11/14/2018
200,000.00
198,434.85
0.00
0.00
198,487.02
2,475.00
2,750.00
183.33
458.33
52.17
0.00
52.17
510.50
510.50
3137EAEP0 FHLMC
Note
1.5% Due 02/12/2025
02/13/2020
02/14/2020
245,000.00
244,841.43
0.00
0.00
244,844.64
1,112.71
0.00
1,418.96
306.25
3.21
0.00
3.21
309.46
309.46
3137EAEU9 FHLMC
Note
0.375% Due 07/21/2025
07/21/2020
07/23/2020
145,000.00
144,329.76
0.00
0.00
144,342.03
193.33
0.00
238.65
45.32
12.27
0.00
12.27
57.59
57.59
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 15
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Income Earned
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
3137EAEX3 FHLMC
Note
0.375% Due 09/23/2025
09/23/2020
09/25/2020
230,000.00
229,333.13
0.00
0.00
229,344.90
158.13
0.00
230.00
71.87
11.77
0.00
11.77
83.64
83.64
3137EAEY1 FHLMC
Note
0.125% Due 10/16/2023
10/22/2020
10/23/2020
180,000.00
179,279.78
0.00
0.00
179,301.06
28.13
0.00
46.88
18.75
21.28
0.00
21.28
40.03
40.03
369550BE7 General Dynamics Corp
Note
3% Due 05/11/2021
05/15/2018
05/18/2018
125,000.00
124,871.19
0.00
0.00
124,895.99
208.33
0.00
520.83
312.50
24.80
0.00
24.80
337.30
337.30
43813KAC6 Honda Auto Receivables Trust
2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
09/22/2020
09/29/2020
90,000.00
89,987.51
0.00
0.00
89,987.87
12.03
27.75
12.03
27.75
0.36
0.00
0.36
28.11
28.11
43815HAC1 Honda Auto Receivables Trust
2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 08/22/2022
08/21/2018
08/28/2018
31,590.83
35,163.12
0.00
3,574.37
31,589.05
28.82
86.45
25.89
83.52
0.30
0.00
0.30
83.82
83.82
43815NAC8 Honda Auto Receivables Trust
2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 08/15/2023
08/20/2019
08/27/2019
80,000.00
79,999.61
0.00
0.00
79,999.63
63.29
118.67
63.29
118.67
0.02
0.00
0.02
118.69
118.69
46625HJX9 JP Morgan Chase
Note
3.625% Due 05/13/2024
12/19/2019
12/24/2019
145,000.00
151,727.87
0.00
0.00
151,562.21
262.81
0.00
700.83
438.02
0.00
165.66
(165.66)
272.36
272.36
477870AC3 John Deere Owner Trust
2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
07/16/2019
07/24/2019
40,000.00
39,994.13
0.00
0.00
39,994.30
39.29
73.67
39.29
73.67
0.17
0.00
0.17
73.84
73.84
47787NAC3 John Deere Owner Trust
2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
07/14/2020
07/22/2020
25,000.00
24,996.59
0.00
0.00
24,996.68
5.67
10.63
5.67
10.63
0.09
0.00
0.09
10.72
10.72
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 16
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Income Earned
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
47789KAC7 John Deere Owner Trust
2020-A A3
1.1% Due 08/15/2024
03/04/2020
03/11/2020
60,000.00
59,996.93
0.00
0.00
59,997.00
29.33
55.00
29.33
55.00
0.07
0.00
0.07
55.07
55.07
65479JAD5 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner
2019-C A3
1.93% Due 07/15/2024
10/16/2019
10/23/2019
85,000.00
84,996.56
0.00
0.00
84,996.64
72.91
136.71
72.91
136.71
0.08
0.00
0.08
136.79
136.79
68389XBK0 Oracle Corp
Callable Note Cont 8/15/2021
1.9% Due 09/15/2021
10/12/2017
10/16/2017
200,000.00
199,689.44
0.00
0.00
199,722.87
802.22
0.00
1,118.89
316.67
33.43
0.00
33.43
350.10
350.10
808513AW5 Charles Schwab Corp
Callable Note Cont 4/21/2021
3.25% Due 05/21/2021
05/30/2018
06/01/2018
150,000.00
150,135.12
0.00
0.00
150,105.41
135.42
0.00
541.67
406.25
0.00
29.71
(29.71)
376.54
376.54
89236TDP7 Toyota Motor Credit Corp
Note
2.6% Due 01/11/2022
01/28/2019
01/30/2019
130,000.00
129,483.47
0.00
0.00
129,522.91
1,314.44
0.00
1,596.11
281.67
39.44
0.00
39.44
321.11
321.11
89236XAC0 Toyota Auto Receivables
2020-D A3
0.35% Due 01/15/2025
10/06/2020
10/13/2020
45,000.00
44,991.88
0.00
0.00
44,992.05
7.00
13.13
7.00
13.13
0.17
0.00
0.17
13.30
13.30
89237VAB5 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust
2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
07/21/2020
07/27/2020
55,000.00
54,996.12
0.00
0.00
54,996.20
10.76
20.17
10.76
20.17
0.08
0.00
0.08
20.25
20.25
89238KAD4 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust
2017-D A3
1.93% Due 01/18/2022
10/17/2019
10/21/2019
11,870.95
16,339.21
0.00
4,470.19
11,869.65
11.39
26.28
8.27
23.16
0.63
0.00
0.63
23.79
23.79
91159HHL7 US Bancorp
Callable Note 1X 12/29/2020
Due 01/29/2021
05/02/2017
05/05/2017
0.00
125,021.25
0.00
125,000.00
0.00
995.49
1,223.96
0.00
228.47
0.00
21.25
(21.25)
207.22
207.22
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 17
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Income Earned
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
9128282U3 US Treasury
Note
1.875% Due 08/31/2024
12/12/2019
12/13/2019
230,000.00
230,977.97
0.00
0.00
230,955.83
1,095.99
0.00
1,465.30
369.31
0.00
22.14
(22.14)
347.17
347.17
9128284D9 US Treasury
Note
2.5% Due 03/31/2023
Various
Various
210,000.00
207,959.36
0.00
0.00
208,033.79
894.23
0.00
1,341.34
447.11
74.43
0.00
74.43
521.54
521.54
912828G53 US Treasury
Note
1.875% Due 11/30/2021
04/26/2017
04/27/2017
220,000.00
220,141.84
0.00
0.00
220,129.76
11.33
0.00
362.64
351.31
0.00
12.08
(12.08)
339.23
339.23
912828L24 US Treasury
Note
1.875% Due 08/31/2022
07/22/2019
07/23/2019
150,000.00
150,260.20
0.00
0.00
150,247.55
714.78
0.00
955.63
240.85
0.00
12.65
(12.65)
228.20
228.20
912828M80 US Treasury
Note
2% Due 11/30/2022
04/11/2019
04/15/2019
200,000.00
198,817.95
0.00
0.00
198,868.22
10.99
0.00
351.65
340.66
50.27
0.00
50.27
390.93
390.93
912828S76 US Treasury
Note
1.125% Due 07/31/2021
11/29/2017
11/30/2017
100,000.00
99,455.69
0.00
0.00
99,525.41
376.02
0.00
470.79
94.77
69.72
0.00
69.72
164.49
164.49
912828T34 US Treasury
Note
1.125% Due 09/30/2021
05/30/2018
05/31/2018
125,000.00
123,555.73
0.00
0.00
123,703.50
239.53
0.00
359.29
119.76
147.77
0.00
147.77
267.53
267.53
912828W71 US Treasury
Note
2.125% Due 03/31/2024
12/05/2019
12/06/2019
210,000.00
213,339.76
0.00
0.00
213,254.62
760.10
0.00
1,140.14
380.04
0.00
85.14
(85.14)
294.90
294.90
912828W89 US Treasury
Note
1.875% Due 03/31/2022
04/26/2018
04/27/2018
200,000.00
197,812.17
0.00
0.00
197,952.01
638.74
0.00
958.10
319.36
139.84
0.00
139.84
459.20
459.20
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 18
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Income Earned
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
912828WN6 US Treasury
Note
Due 05/31/2021
04/29/2019
04/30/2019
0.00
199,719.78
0.00
199,743.01
0.00
10.99
175.82
0.00
164.83
23.23
0.00
23.23
188.06
188.06
912828Y61 US Treasury
Note
2.75% Due 07/31/2023
12/27/2018
12/28/2018
175,000.00
175,709.65
0.00
0.00
175,687.01
1,608.53
0.00
2,013.93
405.40
0.00
22.64
(22.64)
382.76
382.76
912828Y87 US Treasury
Note
1.75% Due 07/31/2024
01/17/2020
01/21/2020
220,000.00
220,939.08
0.00
0.00
220,917.32
1,286.82
0.00
1,611.14
324.32
0.00
21.76
(21.76)
302.56
302.56
912828YV6 US Treasury
Note
1.5% Due 11/30/2024
12/12/2019
12/13/2019
230,000.00
227,924.68
0.00
0.00
227,968.74
9.48
0.00
303.30
293.82
44.06
0.00
44.06
337.88
337.88
912828ZC7 US Treasury
Note
1.125% Due 02/28/2025
03/24/2020
03/25/2020
400,000.00
410,367.94
0.00
0.00
410,160.58
1,143.65
0.00
1,529.01
385.36
0.00
207.36
(207.36)
178.00
178.00
912828ZT0 US Treasury
Note
0.25% Due 05/31/2025
06/04/2020
06/05/2020
230,000.00
228,533.68
0.00
0.00
228,561.36
1.58
0.00
50.55
48.97
27.68
0.00
27.68
76.65
76.65
91282CAZ4 US Treasury
Note
0.375% Due 11/30/2025
12/15/2020
12/16/2020
240,000.00
0.00
240,018.75
0.00
240,018.58
0.00
(39.56)
79.12
39.56
0.00
0.17
(0.17)
39.39
39.39
931142EJ8 Wal-Mart Stores
Note
3.125% Due 06/23/2021
Various
Various
200,000.00
200,175.45
0.00
0.00
200,148.79
2,743.05
3,125.00
138.89
520.84
0.00
26.66
(26.66)
494.18
494.18
Total Fixed Income 10,763,461.78
10,913,195.73
240,018.75
332,787.57
10,819,446.53
54,330.29
22,028.68
49,411.49
17,109.88
1,312.85
2,293.23
(980.38)
16,129.50 16,129.50
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 19
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Income Earned
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
CASH & EQUIVALENT
31846V203 First American
Govt Obligation Fund Class Y
Various
Various
155,105.38
39,349.53
154,937.19
39,181.34
155,105.38
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
Total Cash & Equivalent 155,105.38
39,349.53
154,937.19
39,181.34
155,105.38
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21 0.21
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 10,918,567.16
10,952,545.26
394,955.94
371,968.91
10,974,551.91
54,330.29
22,028.89
49,411.49
17,110.09
1,312.85
2,293.23
(980.38)
16,129.71 16,129.71
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 20
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
01/07/2021 Interest 3135G0X24 225,000.00 FNMA Note
1.625% Due 1/7/2025
0.00 1,828.13 1,828.13
01/10/2021 Interest 24422EUR8 150,000.00 John Deere Capital Corp Note
3.45% Due 1/10/2024
0.00 2,587.50 2,587.50
01/11/2021 Interest 06051GEU9 130,000.00 Bank of America Corp Note
3.3% Due 1/11/2023
0.00 2,145.00 2,145.00
01/11/2021 Interest 89236TDP7 130,000.00 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note
2.6% Due 1/11/2022
0.00 1,690.00 1,690.00
01/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,071.12 73.67 1,144.79
01/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
984.29 13.13 997.42
01/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
5,284.37 118.67 5,403.04
01/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
01/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,284.67 55.00 1,339.67
01/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,884.88 136.71 2,021.59
01/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
01/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
1,644.68 19.09 1,663.77
01/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
01/19/2021 Interest 3135G0T94 290,000.00 FNMA Note
2.375% Due 1/19/2023
0.00 3,443.75 3,443.75
01/21/2021 Interest 3137EAEU9 145,000.00 FHLMC Note
0.375% Due 7/21/2025
0.00 268.85 268.85
01/21/2021 Paydown 43815HAC1 31,590.83 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
6,574.76 77.66 6,652.42
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 21
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
01/29/2021 Interest 06406RAE7 145,000.00 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Callable Note Cont
12/29/2022
2.95% Due 1/29/2023
0.00 2,138.75 2,138.75
01/31/2021 Interest 912828S76 100,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 7/31/2021
0.00 562.50 562.50
01/31/2021 Interest 912828Y87 220,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.75% Due 7/31/2024
0.00 1,925.00 1,925.00
01/31/2021 Interest 912828Y61 175,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.75% Due 7/31/2023
0.00 2,406.25 2,406.25
JAN 2021 18,728.77 19,548.21 38,276.98
02/05/2021 Interest 3135G0V34 375,000.00 FNMA Note
2.5% Due 2/5/2024
0.00 4,687.50 4,687.50
02/12/2021 Interest 3137EAEP0 245,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.5% Due 2/12/2025
0.00 1,837.50 1,837.50
02/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,288.21 53.82 1,342.03
02/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
02/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
5,139.14 110.83 5,249.97
02/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,073.36 71.69 1,145.05
02/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
02/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,889.12 133.68 2,022.80
02/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
982.00 12.84 994.84
02/17/2021 Interest 3135G0N82 315,000.00 FNMA Note
1.25% Due 8/17/2021
0.00 1,968.75 1,968.75
02/18/2021 Maturity 3130A7CV5 175,000.00 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 2/18/2021
175,000.00 1,203.13 176,203.13
02/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 22
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
02/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
1,523.84 16.45 1,540.29
02/21/2021 Paydown 43815HAC1 31,590.83 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
6,079.49 61.50 6,140.99
02/25/2021 Interest 3135G05X7 230,000.00 FNMA Note
0.375% Due 8/25/2025
0.00 426.46 426.46
02/28/2021 Interest 9128282U3 230,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 8/31/2024
0.00 2,156.25 2,156.25
02/28/2021 Interest 912828ZC7 400,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 2/28/2025
0.00 2,250.00 2,250.00
02/28/2021 Interest 912828L24 150,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 8/31/2022
0.00 1,406.25 1,406.25
02/28/2021 Maturity 17275RBD3 150,000.00 Cisco Systems Note
2.2% Due 2/28/2021
150,000.00 1,650.00 151,650.00
FEB 2021 342,975.16 18,105.20 361,080.36
03/06/2021 Interest 3135G0W33 200,000.00 FNMA Note
1.375% Due 9/6/2022
0.00 1,375.00 1,375.00
03/08/2021 Interest 313383YJ4 200,000.00 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 9/8/2023
0.00 3,375.00 3,375.00
03/11/2021 Interest 313378WG2 300,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 3/11/2022
0.00 3,750.00 3,750.00
03/13/2021 Interest 3130A2UW4 150,000.00 FHLB Note
2.875% Due 9/13/2024
0.00 2,156.25 2,156.25
03/15/2021 Interest 084670BR8 150,000.00 Berkshire Hathaway Callable Note Cont 1/15/2023
2.75% Due 3/15/2023
0.00 2,062.50 2,062.50
03/15/2021 Interest 68389XBK0 200,000.00 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont 8/15/2021
1.9% Due 9/15/2021
0.00 1,900.00 1,900.00
03/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,893.37 130.64 2,024.01
03/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
979.67 12.55 992.22
03/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,075.59 69.72 1,145.31
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 23
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
03/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
03/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,291.75 52.64 1,344.39
03/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
03/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
4,993.55 103.21 5,096.76
03/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
1,402.70 14.00 1,416.70
03/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
03/21/2021 Paydown 43815HAC1 31,590.83 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
5,582.38 46.55 5,628.93
03/23/2021 Interest 3137EAEX3 230,000.00 FHLMC Note
0.375% Due 9/23/2025
0.00 426.46 426.46
03/31/2021 Interest 912828T34 125,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 9/30/2021
0.00 703.13 703.13
03/31/2021 Interest 9128284D9 210,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.5% Due 3/31/2023
0.00 2,625.00 2,625.00
03/31/2021 Interest 912828W71 210,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.125% Due 3/31/2024
0.00 2,231.25 2,231.25
03/31/2021 Interest 912828W89 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 3/31/2022
0.00 1,875.00 1,875.00
MAR 2021 17,219.01 22,967.45 40,186.46
04/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,295.30 51.46 1,346.76
04/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
04/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
04/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,897.64 127.59 2,025.23
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 24
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
04/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
4,847.61 95.80 4,943.41
04/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,077.83 67.74 1,145.57
04/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
977.32 12.27 989.59
04/16/2021 Interest 3137EAEY1 180,000.00 FHLMC Note
0.125% Due 10/16/2023
0.00 112.50 112.50
04/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
04/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
1,281.27 11.74 1,293.01
04/21/2021 Call 808513AW5 150,000.00 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note Cont 4/21/2021
3.25% Due 5/21/2021
150,000.00 2,031.25 152,031.25
04/21/2021 Paydown 43815HAC1 31,590.83 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
5,083.44 32.83 5,116.27
04/22/2021 Interest 3135G03U5 310,000.00 FNMA Note
0.625% Due 4/22/2025
0.00 968.75 968.75
APR 2021 166,460.41 3,570.48 170,030.89
05/03/2021 Interest 037833AK6 200,000.00 Apple Inc Note
2.4% Due 5/3/2023
0.00 2,400.00 2,400.00
05/07/2021 Interest 3135G06G3 250,000.00 FNMA Note
0.5% Due 11/7/2025
0.00 607.64 607.64
05/11/2021 Maturity 369550BE7 125,000.00 General Dynamics Corp Note
3% Due 5/11/2021
125,000.00 1,875.00 126,875.00
05/13/2021 Interest 46625HJX9 145,000.00 JP Morgan Chase Note
3.625% Due 5/13/2024
0.00 2,628.13 2,628.13
05/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
05/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,298.86 50.27 1,349.13
05/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,901.90 124.54 2,026.44
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 25
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
05/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
05/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,080.08 65.75 1,145.83
05/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
974.94 11.98 986.92
05/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
4,701.32 88.61 4,789.93
05/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
1,159.55 9.68 1,169.23
05/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
05/21/2021 Paydown 43815HAC1 31,590.83 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
4,582.65 20.33 4,602.98
05/31/2021 Interest 912828G53 220,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 11/30/2021
0.00 2,062.50 2,062.50
05/31/2021 Interest 912828M80 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
2% Due 11/30/2022
0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
05/31/2021 Interest 912828ZT0 230,000.00 US Treasury Note
0.25% Due 5/31/2025
0.00 287.50 287.50
05/31/2021 Interest 912828YV6 230,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.5% Due 11/30/2024
0.00 1,725.00 1,725.00
05/31/2021 Interest 91282CAZ4 240,000.00 US Treasury Note
0.375% Due 11/30/2025
0.00 450.00 450.00
MAY 2021 140,699.30 14,465.48 155,164.78
06/08/2021 Interest 3130A0F70 220,000.00 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 12/8/2023
0.00 3,712.50 3,712.50
06/09/2021 Interest 3130A3KM5 100,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 12/9/2022
0.00 1,250.00 1,250.00
06/10/2021 Interest 313379Q69 200,000.00 FHLB Note
2.125% Due 6/10/2022
0.00 2,125.00 2,125.00
06/13/2021 Interest 3130A3GE8 250,000.00 FHLB Note
2.75% Due 12/13/2024
0.00 3,437.50 3,437.50
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 26
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
06/13/2021 Interest 3130AJKW8 225,000.00 FHLB Note
0.5% Due 6/13/2025
0.00 562.50 562.50
06/14/2021 Interest 3130A1XJ2 210,000.00 FHLB Note
2.875% Due 6/14/2024
0.00 3,018.76 3,018.76
06/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
4,554.68 81.63 4,636.31
06/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,082.33 63.76 1,146.09
06/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
06/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,906.19 121.48 2,027.67
06/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,302.43 49.08 1,351.51
06/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
972.54 11.70 984.24
06/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
06/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
1,037.54 7.81 1,045.35
06/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
06/19/2021 Interest 3137EAEN5 200,000.00 FHLMC Note
2.75% Due 6/19/2023
0.00 2,750.00 2,750.00
06/21/2021 Paydown 43815HAC1 31,590.83 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
3,688.11 9.07 3,697.18
06/23/2021 Maturity 931142EJ8 200,000.00 Wal-Mart Stores Note
3.125% Due 6/23/2021
200,000.00 3,125.00 203,125.00
JUN 2021 214,543.82 20,384.34 234,928.16
07/07/2021 Interest 3135G0X24 225,000.00 FNMA Note
1.625% Due 1/7/2025
0.00 1,828.13 1,828.13
07/10/2021 Interest 24422EUR8 150,000.00 John Deere Capital Corp Note
3.45% Due 1/10/2024
0.00 2,587.50 2,587.50
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 27
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
07/11/2021 Interest 06051GEU9 130,000.00 Bank of America Corp Note
3.3% Due 1/11/2023
0.00 2,145.00 2,145.00
07/11/2021 Interest 89236TDP7 130,000.00 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note
2.6% Due 1/11/2022
0.00 1,690.00 1,690.00
07/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,910.47 118.42 2,028.89
07/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
4,407.68 74.88 4,482.56
07/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
970.11 11.41 981.52
07/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,084.58 61.77 1,146.35
07/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
07/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,306.01 47.89 1,353.90
07/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
07/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
07/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
915.22 6.15 921.37
07/19/2021 Interest 3135G0T94 290,000.00 FNMA Note
2.375% Due 1/19/2023
0.00 3,443.75 3,443.75
07/21/2021 Interest 3137EAEU9 145,000.00 FHLMC Note
0.375% Due 7/21/2025
0.00 271.88 271.88
07/29/2021 Interest 06406RAE7 145,000.00 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Callable Note Cont
12/29/2022
2.95% Due 1/29/2023
0.00 2,138.75 2,138.75
07/31/2021 Interest 912828Y87 220,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.75% Due 7/31/2024
0.00 1,925.00 1,925.00
07/31/2021 Interest 912828Y61 175,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.75% Due 7/31/2023
0.00 2,406.25 2,406.25
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 28
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
07/31/2021 Maturity 912828S76 100,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 7/31/2021
100,000.00 562.50 100,562.50
JUL 2021 110,594.07 19,377.83 129,971.90
08/05/2021 Interest 3135G0V34 375,000.00 FNMA Note
2.5% Due 2/5/2024
0.00 4,687.50 4,687.50
08/12/2021 Interest 3137EAEP0 245,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.5% Due 2/12/2025
0.00 1,837.50 1,837.50
08/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
4,260.32 68.34 4,328.66
08/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,086.84 59.77 1,146.61
08/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,309.60 46.69 1,356.29
08/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
967.65 11.13 978.78
08/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
08/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
08/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,914.77 115.34 2,030.11
08/17/2021 Maturity 3135G0N82 315,000.00 FNMA Note
1.25% Due 8/17/2021
315,000.00 1,968.75 316,968.75
08/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
08/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
792.62 4.67 797.29
08/25/2021 Interest 3135G05X7 230,000.00 FNMA Note
0.375% Due 8/25/2025
0.00 431.25 431.25
08/31/2021 Interest 912828L24 150,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 8/31/2022
0.00 1,406.25 1,406.25
08/31/2021 Interest 912828ZC7 400,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 2/28/2025
0.00 2,250.00 2,250.00
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 29
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
08/31/2021 Interest 9128282U3 230,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 8/31/2024
0.00 2,156.25 2,156.25
AUG 2021 325,331.80 15,101.99 340,433.79
09/06/2021 Interest 3135G0W33 200,000.00 FNMA Note
1.375% Due 9/6/2022
0.00 1,375.00 1,375.00
09/08/2021 Interest 313383YJ4 200,000.00 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 9/8/2023
0.00 3,375.00 3,375.00
09/11/2021 Interest 313378WG2 300,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 3/11/2022
0.00 3,750.00 3,750.00
09/13/2021 Interest 3130A2UW4 150,000.00 FHLB Note
2.875% Due 9/13/2024
0.00 2,156.25 2,156.25
09/15/2021 Interest 084670BR8 150,000.00 Berkshire Hathaway Callable Note Cont 1/15/2023
2.75% Due 3/15/2023
0.00 2,062.50 2,062.50
09/15/2021 Maturity 68389XBK0 200,000.00 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont 8/15/2021
1.9% Due 9/15/2021
200,000.00 1,900.00 201,900.00
09/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
09/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
09/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,313.21 45.49 1,358.70
09/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,919.08 112.26 2,031.34
09/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
965.16 10.85 976.01
09/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
4,112.61 62.02 4,174.63
09/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,089.10 57.77 1,146.87
09/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
09/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
669.71 3.40 673.11
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 30
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
09/23/2021 Interest 3137EAEX3 230,000.00 FHLMC Note
0.375% Due 9/23/2025
0.00 431.25 431.25
09/30/2021 Interest 912828W89 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 3/31/2022
0.00 1,875.00 1,875.00
09/30/2021 Interest 912828W71 210,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.125% Due 3/31/2024
0.00 2,231.25 2,231.25
09/30/2021 Interest 9128284D9 210,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.5% Due 3/31/2023
0.00 2,625.00 2,625.00
09/30/2021 Maturity 912828T34 125,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 9/30/2021
125,000.00 703.13 125,703.13
SEP 2021 335,068.87 22,834.72 357,903.59
10/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
3,964.54 55.92 4,020.46
10/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,091.38 55.76 1,147.14
10/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
10/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,316.82 44.28 1,361.10
10/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
962.65 10.57 973.22
10/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
10/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,923.39 109.18 2,032.57
10/16/2021 Interest 3137EAEY1 180,000.00 FHLMC Note
0.125% Due 10/16/2023
0.00 112.50 112.50
10/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
10/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
546.51 2.32 548.83
10/22/2021 Interest 3135G03U5 310,000.00 FNMA Note
0.625% Due 4/22/2025
0.00 968.75 968.75
OCT 2021 9,805.29 1,417.83 11,223.12
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 31
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
11/03/2021 Interest 037833AK6 200,000.00 Apple Inc Note
2.4% Due 5/3/2023
0.00 2,400.00 2,400.00
11/07/2021 Interest 3135G06G3 250,000.00 FNMA Note
0.5% Due 11/7/2025
0.00 625.00 625.00
11/13/2021 Interest 46625HJX9 145,000.00 JP Morgan Chase Note
3.625% Due 5/13/2024
0.00 2,628.13 2,628.13
11/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,093.65 53.75 1,147.40
11/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
11/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
11/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,927.73 106.08 2,033.81
11/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
3,816.11 50.04 3,866.15
11/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,320.44 43.08 1,363.52
11/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
960.10 10.29 970.39
11/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
11/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
423.01 1.44 424.45
11/30/2021 Interest 912828YV6 230,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.5% Due 11/30/2024
0.00 1,725.00 1,725.00
11/30/2021 Interest 91282CAZ4 240,000.00 US Treasury Note
0.375% Due 11/30/2025
0.00 450.00 450.00
11/30/2021 Interest 912828M80 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
2% Due 11/30/2022
0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
11/30/2021 Interest 912828ZT0 230,000.00 US Treasury Note
0.25% Due 5/31/2025
0.00 287.50 287.50
11/30/2021 Maturity 912828G53 220,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 11/30/2021
220,000.00 2,062.50 222,062.50
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 32
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
NOV 2021 229,541.04 12,501.36 242,042.40
12/08/2021 Interest 3130A0F70 220,000.00 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 12/8/2023
0.00 3,712.50 3,712.50
12/09/2021 Interest 3130A3KM5 100,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 12/9/2022
0.00 1,250.00 1,250.00
12/10/2021 Interest 313379Q69 200,000.00 FHLB Note
2.125% Due 6/10/2022
0.00 2,125.00 2,125.00
12/13/2021 Interest 3130A3GE8 250,000.00 FHLB Note
2.75% Due 12/13/2024
0.00 3,437.50 3,437.50
12/13/2021 Interest 3130AJKW8 225,000.00 FHLB Note
0.5% Due 6/13/2025
0.00 562.50 562.50
12/14/2021 Interest 3130A1XJ2 210,000.00 FHLB Note
2.875% Due 6/14/2024
0.00 3,018.76 3,018.76
12/15/2021 Paydown 47787NAC3 25,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3
0.51% Due 11/15/2024
0.00 10.63 10.63
12/15/2021 Paydown 65479JAD5 85,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3
1.93% Due 7/15/2024
1,932.07 102.98 2,035.05
12/15/2021 Paydown 47789KAC7 60,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-A A3
1.1% Due 8/15/2024
1,324.07 41.87 1,365.94
12/15/2021 Paydown 89236XAC0 45,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.35% Due 1/15/2025
957.53 10.01 967.54
12/15/2021 Paydown 89237VAB5 55,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3
0.44% Due 10/15/2024
0.00 20.17 20.17
12/15/2021 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
3,667.32 44.38 3,711.70
12/15/2021 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
1,095.93 51.74 1,147.67
12/18/2021 Paydown 43813KAC6 90,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3
0.37% Due 10/18/2024
0.00 27.75 27.75
12/18/2021 Paydown 89238KAD4 11,870.95 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2017-D A3
1.93% Due 1/18/2022
299.21 0.76 299.97
12/19/2021 Interest 3137EAEN5 200,000.00 FHLMC Note
2.75% Due 6/19/2023
0.00 2,750.00 2,750.00
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 33
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Cash Flow Report
As of December 31, 2020
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
DEC 2021 9,276.13 17,166.55 26,442.68
TOTAL 1,920,243.67 187,441.44 2,107,685.11
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 34
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Important DisclosuresCity of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Chandler Asset Management, Inc. ;͞Chandler͟Ϳis an SEC registered investment adviser. For additional information about our firm, please see our current disclosures (Form ADV). To
obtain a copy of our current disclosures, you may contact your client service representative by calling the number on the front of this statement or you may visit our website at
www.chandlerasset.com.
Information contained in this monthly statement is confidential and is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment or legal advice. The
information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of this statement, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without
notice.
Custody: Your qualified custodian bank maintains control of all assets reflected in this statement and we urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified
custodian. Chandler does not have any authority to withdraw or deposit funds from/to the custodian account.
Valuation: Prices are provided by IDC, an independent pricing source. In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will
obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in
Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.
Performance: Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client ͛s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results
include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any
specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market
conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio.
Source ice Data Indices, LLC ("ICE"), used with permission. ICE PERMITS USE OF THE ICE INDICES AND RELATED DATA ON AN "AS IS" BASIS; ICE, ITS AFFILIATES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE
THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS AND/OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, INCLUDING THE INDICES, INDEX DATA AND ANY DATA INCLUDED IN, RELATED TO, OR DERIVED THEREFROM. NEITHER ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES OR
THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS GUARANTEE THE QUALITY, ADEQUACY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INDICES OR THE INDEX DATA OR ANY
COMPONENT THEREOF, AND THE INDICES AND INDEX DATA AND ALL COMPONENTS THEREOF ARE PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS AND LICENSEE'S USE IS AT LICENSEE'S OWN RISK. ICE
DATA, ITS AFFILIATES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY DO NOT SPONSOR, ENDORSE, OR RECOMMEND CHANDLER, OR ANY OF ITS PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.
Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial
charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest
directly in an index.
Ratings: Ratings information have been provided by Moody͛s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee
its accuracy.
Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities ;͞MBS͟Ϳreflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency
guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a AA+/Aaa/AAA by S&P, Moody ͛s and Fitch respectively.
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 35
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Benchmark Index & DisclosuresCity of San Jacinto California
Account #10167
Benchmark Index Disclosure
City of San Jacinto 1-5 Year Govt
Blended Index*
The ICE BAML 1-5 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US
agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody ͛s,
S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than five years remaining term to
final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for
sovereigns and $250 million for agencies. (Index: GVA0. Please visit www.mlindex.ml.com for more information)
The ICE BAML 1-3 Year US Treasury Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated sovereign debt publicly issued by the US
government in its domestic market. Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than three
years remaining term to final maturity, a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion. Qualifying securities must
have at least 18 months to final maturity at the time of issuance. (Index: G 1O2. Please visit www.mlindex.ml.com for more information)
City of San Jacinto 1-5 Yr Corp/Gov
AAA-A Blend*
Execution Time: 1/4/2021 6:51:28 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 36
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
City of San Jacinto Public Trust Advisors LLC
595 S. San Jacinto Ave.550 South Hope Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583 Suite 560
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Monthly Investment Report for Period Ended December 31, 2020
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Investment Management Portfolio Review Page
Investment Portfolio Summary Comparison 3
Total Return Performance Summary 4
Investment Portfolio Maturity Distribution 6
Investment Portfolio Maturity Distribution By Security Type 7
Investment Portfolio Rating Distribution 8
Investment Portfolio Security Distribution - Market Value 9
Investment Portfolio Security Distribution - Historical Cost 10
Investment Portfolio Compliance 11
Additional Disclosure 12
Portfolio Holdings Detail 13
City of San Jacinto Summary
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
City of San Jacinto
December 1, 2020
Beginning Balance
December 31, 2020
Ending Balance Portfolio Characteristic
December 1, 2020
Beginning Balance
December 31, 2020
Ending Balance
Historical Cost 11,078,815.42$ 11,103,012.55$ Book Yield Gross 1.26%1.21%
Book Value 11,067,908.38$ 11,087,613.81$ Market Yield Gross 0.25%0.22%
Accrued Interest 41,266.15 37,583.17 Weighted Average Coupon 1.48%1.44%
Book Value Plus Accrued 11,109,174.53$ 11,125,196.98$ Duration 2.58 Years 2.57 Years
Net Unrealized Gain/Loss 237,220.87 234,734.80 Weighted Effective Maturity 2.64 Years 2.62 Years
Market Value Plus Accrued(2)11,346,395.40$ 11,359,931.78$ Weighted Final Maturity 2.65 Years 2.64 Years
Net Pending Transactions 0.13 0.12
Market Value Plus Accrued Net(2)11,346,395.53$ 11,359,931.90$
City of San Jacinto
December 2020
Net Income Portfolio Compliance Compliant
Interest Income 13,210.28$ Security Distribution YES
Net Amortization/Accretion (2,040.72)Maturity Distribution YES
Net Realized Gain/Loss(3)4,957.05 Rating Distribution YES
Miscellaneous Income -
Net Income 16,126.61$
City of San Jacinto Summary Comparison for the period December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020
(1) Payables represent amounts due to settle security transactions that have been executed but have not settled as of period end. The funds used to settle these trades may come from a variety of sources including cash within the
portfolio, proceeds from future security transactions including maturities and sales, or other sources including money market funds. For reporting purposes, a payable is created for over-period settlements which are reflected in the
detailed holdings.
(2) Market Value Plus Accrued Net represents the market value of the portfolio net payables and recievables from transactions that settle in the following reporting period.
(3) MBS paydowns may result in negative realized losses rather than amortization in as a result of accounting method.
Page 3
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Trailing Month Trailing 3 Months Trailing 12 Months Year to Date
Total Return Performance Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic
City of San Jacinto 0.12%0.13%4.50%4.50%
Trailing 3 Years Trailing 5 Years Since Inception*
Total Return Performance Annualized Annualized Annualized
City of San Jacinto 3.26%2.23%1.61%
*Total return since inception date: December 1, 2012
Annualized total return performance presented for investment periods longer than one year. Return information obtained from Bloomberg.
City of San Jacinto Total Return December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020
0.12% 0.13%
4.50% 4.50%
3.26%
1.61%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
5.00%
Trailing Month Trailing 3 Months Trailing 12 Months Year to Date Trailing 3 Years Trailing 5 Years Since Inception*YieldTotal Return Performance
City of San Jacinto
Page 4
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Trailing Month Trailing 3 Months Trailing 12 Months Year to Date
Total Return Performance Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic
City of San Jacinto 0.12%0.13%NA NA
BofA ML 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury/Agency 0.07%0.03%NA NA
Since Inception*
Trailing 3 Years Trailing 5 Years February 1, 2020
Total Return Performance Annualized Annualized Annualized
City of San Jacinto NA NA NA
BofA ML 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury/Agency NA NA NA
*Original Total return since inception date: December 1, 2012. The BofA ML 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury/Agency benchmark established on February 1, 2020.
Annualized total return performance presented for investment periods longer than one year. Return information obtained from Bloomberg.
City of San Jacinto Total Return December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020
0.12% 0.13%
0.07%
0.03%
0.00%
0.25%
0.50%
Trailing Month Trailing 3 Months Trailing 12 Months Year to Date Trailing 3 Years Trailing 5 Years February 1, 2020YieldTotal Return Performance vs. Benchmark
City of San Jacinto BofA ML 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury/Agency
Page 5
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Maturity Distribution
December 1, 2020
Beginning Balance
December 31, 2020
Ending Balance Portfolio Allocation Distribution Change
0-3 Months 15,800.51$ 37,509.94$ 0.33%0.19%
3-6 Months - - 0.00%0.00%
6-9 Months - - 0.00%0.00%
9-12 Months 443,881.18 460,323.99 4.05%0.14%
1-2 Years 3,287,079.16 3,026,442.77 26.64%-2.33%
2-3 Years 3,562,676.78 3,863,860.86 34.01%2.61%
3-4 Years 2,296,574.16 1,994,789.19 17.56%-2.68%
4-5 Years 1,740,383.62 1,977,005.02 17.40%2.06%
5-6 Years - - 0.00%0.00%
6 Years +- - 0.00%0.00%
Total Portfolio 11,346,395.40$ 11,359,931.78$ 100.00%
City of San Jacinto Maturity Distribution Market Value Basis December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
$4,500,000
0-3 M 3-6 M 6-9 M 9-12 M 1-2 Yr 2-3 Yr 3-4 Yr 4-5 Yr 5-6 Yr 6 Yr +
Maturity Distribution Comparison
December 1, 2020 December 31, 2020
0-3 M
0.33%
9-12 M
4.05%
1-2 Yr
26.64%
2-3 Yr
34.01%
3-4 Yr
17.56%4-5 Yr
17.40%
Maturity Distribution
Page 6
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Security Distribution 0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 9-12 Months 1-2 Years 2-3 Years 3-4 Years 4-5 Years Total Portfolio
Cash -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Money Market Funds 37,510 - - - - - - - 37,510
Certificates of Deposit - - - - - - - - -
Commercial Paper - - - - - - - - -
U.S. Treasury Notes - - - 460,324 1,927,105 530,830 1,994,789 1,018,403 5,931,452
U.S. Agency Notes - - - - - - - - -
Federal Inst. (GSE)*- - - - 1,021,645 2,443,066 - 958,602 4,423,313
Corporate Notes - - - - 77,693 889,964 - - 967,657
Asset Backed (ABS)- - - - - - - - -
Municipal Bonds - - - - - - - - -
Total 37,510$ -$ -$ 460,324$ 3,026,443$ 3,863,861$ 1,994,789$ 1,977,005$ 11,359,932$
*Mortgage backed securities shown to effective maturity.
City of San Jacinto Maturity Distribution Market Value Basis as of December 31, 2020
$-
$5,000,000
0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 9-12 Months 1-2 Years 2-3 Years 3-4 Years 4-5 Years
Maturity Distribution By Type Municipal Bonds
Asset Backed (ABS)
Corporate Notes
Federal Inst. (GSE)*
U.S. Agency Notes
U.S. Treasury Notes
Commercial Paper
Certificates of Deposit
Money Market Funds
Cash
Page 7
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
S&P Rating Distribution
December 31, 2020
Ending Balance Portfolio Allocation
Short Term Rating Distribution
A-1+-$ 0.00%
A-1 - 0.00%
A-2 - 0.00%
Total Short Term Ratings -$ 0.00%
Long Term Rating Distribution
AAA Rating 585,706.32$ 5.16%
AA Rating 10,688,678.14 94.09%
A Rating 85,547.32 0.75%
Below A - 0.00%
Not Rated - 0.00%
Total Long Term Rating 11,359,931.78$ 100.00%
Total Portfolio 11,359,931.78$ 100.00%
Moody's Rating Distribution
December 31, 2020
Ending Balance Portfolio Allocation
Short Term Rating Distribution
P-1 -$ 0.00%
P-2 - 0.00%
Total Short Term Ratings -$ 0.00%
Long Term Rating Distribution
Aaa Rating 10,638,816.59$ 93.65%
Aa Rating 635,567.87 5.59%
A Rating 85,547.32 0.75%
Below A - 0.00%
Not Rated - 0.00%
Total Long Term Rating 11,359,931.78$ 100.00%
Total Portfolio 11,359,931.78$ 100.00%
City of San Jacinto Rating Distribution Market Value Basis as of December 31, 2020
AAA Rating
5.16%
AA Rating
94.09%
A Rating
0.75%
Portfolio Allocation By Standard and Poors' Rating
Aaa Rating
93.65%
Aa Rating
5.59%
A Rating
0.75%
Portfolio Allocation By Moody's Rating
Page 8
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Security Distribution
December 1, 2020
Beginning Balance
Portfolio
Allocation
December 31, 2020
Ending Balance Book Yield
Portfolio
Allocation
Change in
Allocation
Permitted by
Policy*Compliant
Cash -$ 0.00%-$ 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
LGIP - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
U.S. Treasury Notes 5,942,132.36 52.37%5,931,451.64 1.38%52.21%-0.16%NO
U.S. Agency Notes - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
FNMA 868,896.08 7.66%870,756.29 0.74%7.67%0.01%NO
FHLMC 2,121,973.33 18.70%2,124,137.13 1.34%18.70%0.00%NO
FFCB 891,679.08 7.86%892,404.07 0.38%7.86%0.00%NO
FHLB 535,372.31 4.72%536,015.68 1.08%4.72%0.00%NO
Fed Instrumentality Subtotal 4,417,920.80$ 38.94%4,423,313.17$ 1.00%38.94%0.00%NO
Asset Backed Securities - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Commercial Paper - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Corporate Notes 970,541.73 8.55%967,657.02 1.13%8.52%-0.04%NO
Bankers Acceptances - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Money Market Funds 15,800.51 0.14%37,509.94 0.01%0.33%0.19%YES
Municipal Bonds - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Intergovernmental Funds - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Certificates of Deposit - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Total Portfolio Market Value 11,346,395.40$ 100.00%11,359,931.78$ 1.21%100.00%
*Permitted allocation based on aggregate assets as defined within the investment policy.
City of San Jacinto Market Value Basis Security Distribution December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020
$-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
CashLGIPUSTAgencyFNMAFHLMCFFCBFHLBABSCPCorpBAMMFMuniInter GovCDAsset Balance By Security Type
(in millions)
December 1, 2020 December 31, 2020
UST
52.21%
FNMA
7.67%
FHLMC
18.70%
FFCB
7.86%
FHLB
4.72%
Corp
8.52%
MMF
0.33%
Ending Portfolio Allocation
Page 9
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Security Distribution
December 1, 2020
Beginning Balance
Portfolio
Allocation
December 31, 2020
Ending Balance Book Yield
Portfolio
Allocation
Change in
Allocation
Permitted by
Policy*Compliant
Cash -$ 0.00%-$ 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
U.S. Treasury Notes 5,763,933.59 52.03%5,766,421.29 1.38%51.94%-0.09%NO
U.S. Agency Notes - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
FNMA 862,599.40 7.79%862,599.40 0.74%7.77%-0.02%NO
FHLMC 2,070,796.02 18.69%2,070,796.02 1.34%18.65%-0.04%NO
FFCB 887,991.90 8.02%887,991.90 0.38%8.00%-0.02%NO
FHLB 523,332.00 4.72%523,332.00 1.08%4.71%-0.01%NO
Fed Instrumentality Subtotal 4,344,719.32$ 39.22%4,344,719.32$ 0.99%39.13%-0.09%NO
Asset Backed Securities - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Commercial Paper - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Corporate Notes 954,362.00 8.61%954,362.00 1.13%8.60%-0.02%NO
Bankers Acceptances - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Money Market Funds 15,800.51 0.14%37,509.94 0.01%0.34%0.20%YES
Municipal Bonds - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Intergovernmental Funds - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Certificates of Deposit - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Total Portfolio Historical Cost 11,078,815.42$ 100.00%11,103,012.55$ 1.21%100.00%
*Permitted allocation based on aggregate assets as defined within the investment policy.
City of San Jacinto Historical Cost Basis Security Distribution December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020
$-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
CashUSTAgencyFNMAFHLMCFFCBFHLBABSCPCorpBAMMFMuniInter GovCDAsset Balance By Security Type
(in millions)
December 1, 2020 December 31, 2020
UST
51.94%
FNMA
7.77%
FHLMC
18.65%
FFCB
8.00%
FHLB
4.71%
Corp
8.60%
MMF
0.34%
Ending Portfolio Allocation
Page 10
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Policy
Section Description Compliance Requirement Compliant
Policy
Section Description Compliance Requirement Compliant
IX. 1,2 Municipal Bonds Rated A or better by 1 NRSRO, 5% issuer limitation, 30% total portfolio limit,
5-year maturity limit Compliant IX. 14 Pass-Through
Securities
Issuer debt rated at least A by 2 NRSRO's; Must be rated in the AA category by
2 NRSRO's; 20% total portfolio limit, 5-year maturity limit Compliant
IX. 1 U.S. Treasury No limitations Compliant
IX. 2 Federal Agency No limitations Compliant
IX. 3 Bankers
Acceptances
Rated A1 or better and have long term debt rated A or better by 2 NRSRO's;
Maturity ≤ to 180 days, 40% total portfolio limit, 5% issuer limit Compliant
IX. 4 Federally Insured
Time Deposits
Limited to amounts covered under federal insurance; 20% total portfolio
limit in combination with IX.5; 5-year maturity limit Compliant IX. 17.b Money Market
Funds
Registered with SEC under 1940 Act, have highest ranking by 2 NRSRO's;
retained advisor registered (or exempt from registration) with 5-years
experience investing in securities authorized by CA 53601 and at least $500
million of assets; 20% total portfolio limit
Compliant
IX. 5 Time Deposits
Fully collateralized per CA law, 20% limit when combined with IX.4; Issuer
must have long-term debt rated A or higher and/or short-term debt rated
A1 or higher by 2 NRSRO's, 5-year maturity limit
Compliant IX. 18 Supranationals
US dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or
unconditionally guaranteed by IBRD, IFC, or IADB; rated AA or higher by 1
NRSRO; 30% total portfolio limit; 10% issuer limit; 5-year maturity limit
Compliant
IX. 6 CDARS 30% limit in combination of CD's (including CDARS); 5-year maturity limit Compliant X.A.1 Futures and Options Prohibited Compliant
IX. 7 Negotiable CD's
Issuer must have long-term debt rated A or higher and/or short-term debt
rated A1 or higher by 2 NRSRO's; Maturity ≤ to 5 years, 30% total portfolio
limit, 5% issuer limit
Compliant X.A.2
Inverse Floaters,
Range Notes, and
Mortgage Derived
IO Strips
Prohibited Compliant
IX. 8 Collateralized
Bank Deposits
Collateralized with pleged securities per CA Government Code Section
53651 Compliant X.A.3 Potential Zero
Accrual Securities Prohibited Compliant
X.A.5 Purchasing
Securities on Margin Prohibited Compliant
X.A.6 Reverse Repos or
other leverage Prohibited Compliant
X.A.7 Foreign Currency
Securities Prohibited Compliant
X.B.2 Single Issuer
Limitation
5% issuer limitation, except U.S. Government, its agencies & enterprises,
Money Market Mutual Funds, Mutual Funds, LAIF, LGIP's, and Supranationals Compliant
IX. 11 Local Agency
Investment Fund 70% total portfolio limit, up to the maximum permitted balance Compliant X.C.2 Callable Security
Limitation 20% of total portfolio (excluding Make Whole Call securities)Compliant
IX. 12 Local Government
Investment Pools
Riveride County Investment Fund limited to 70% of the portfolio; JPA Pools
limited to 50% of the portfolio Compliant X.C.3 Maximum Security
Maturity Individual security maturities limited to 5-years or less Compliant
IX. 13 Corporate Bonds
Corporations organized and operating in the U.S. or depository institutions
licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating in the U.S.; Rated in the A
category or better by 2 NRSRO's, 5-year maturity limit; 30% total portfolio
limit, 5% issuer limit
Compliant X.C.4 Portfolio Duration
Limitation
Average portfolio duration will be managed to be approximatly equal to the
Market Benchmark selected by the City (typically +/- 20 of benchmark
duration)
Compliant
IX. 9 Repurchase
Agreements
Collateralized at 102% in accordance with policy; 1-year maturity limit, no %
portfolio limit, collateral held by custodian bank; subject to master
repurchase agreement substantially in SIFMA's form
Compliant
IX. 10 Commercial Paper
Issuer is organized and operating in the U.S. with assets of at least $500
million; Issuer short-term ratings of A1 or higher and long-term ratings of A
or higher by 2 NRSRO's; Maturity ≤ 270 days; 25% total portfolio limit; 5%
issuer limit
Compliant
City of San Jacinto Portfolio Compliance December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020
IX. 17.e Mutual Funds
Invests in securities authorized by specified provisions in CA Government Code
Section 53601; have highest ranking by 2 NRSRO's; retained advisor registered
(or exempt from registration) with 5-years experience investing in securities
authorized by CA 53601 and at least $500 million of assets; 10% per fund limit;
20% limit when combined with IX.17.b
Compliant
Page 11
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Additional Disclosure
This information is for the sole purposes of the client and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations. Please review the contents of this information carefully. Should you have any
questions regarding the information presented, calculation methodology, investment portfolio, security detail, or any other facet of this information, please feel free to contact us.
Public Trust Advisors, LLC (Public Trust) statements and reports are intended to detail our investment advisory activity as well as the activity of certain client accounts managed by Public Trust. The
custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes and settles all investment transactions. The custodian statement is the official record of security and cash holdings transactions. Public
Trust recognizes that clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping; therefore, it is recommended that the client reconcile this information with their custodian bank statement. Many
custodians use a settlement date basis that may result in the need to reconcile due to a timing difference. The underlying market value, amortized cost, and accrued interest may differ between the
custodian and this statement or report. This can be attributed to differences in calculation methodologies and pricing sources used.
Public Trust does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian. Our clients retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies, implementing and enforcing
internal controls, and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions. The total market value represents prices obtained from various sources; it may be impacted by the frequency at
which prices are reported, and such prices are not guaranteed. Prices received from pricing vendors are generally based on current market quotes but when such quotes are not available, the pricing
vendors use a variety of techniques to estimate value. These estimates, particularly for fixed-income securities, may be based on certain minimum principal amounts (e.g. $1 million) and may not
reflect all the factors that affect the value of the security including liquidity risk. The prices provided are not firm bids or offers. Certain securities may reflect N/A or unavailable where the price for
such security is generally not available from a pricing source. The market value of a security, including those priced at par value, may differ from its purchase price and may not closely reflect the
value at which the security may be sold or purchased based on various market factors. The securities in this investment portfolio, including shares of mutual funds, are not guaranteed or otherwise
protected by Public Trust, the FDIC (except for certain non-negotiable certificates of deposit), or any government agency unless specifically stated otherwise.
Clients may be permitted to establish one or more unmanaged accounts for the purposes of client reporting. Clients may also be permitted to provide externally managed assets for the purposes of
client reporting. Public Trust defines unmanaged accounts or assets as one where the investment direction remains the sole responsibility of the client rather than the Investment Manager.
Unmanaged accounts or external assets do not receive ongoing supervision and monitoring services. The Investment Manager does not make any investment recommendations and may not charge a
fee for reporting on these accounts or assets. The primary purpose for this service is to include unmanaged accounts or assets owned by the client in the performance reports provided by the
Investment Manager. The Investment Manager assumes no liability for the underlying performance of any unmanaged accounts or assets, and it is the client’s sole responsibility for the accuracy or
correctness of any such performance.
Beginning and ending balances are based on market value plus accrued interest on a trade date basis. Statements and reports made available to the end user either from Public Trust or through the
online reporting platform may present information and portfolio analytics using various optional methods including, but not limited to, historical cost, amortized cost, and market value. All
information is assumed to be correct, but the accuracy has not been confirmed and therefore is not guaranteed to be correct. Information is obtained from third party sources that may or may not
be verified. The data in this report is unaudited and is only applicable for the date denoted on the report. Market values may change day-to-day based on numerous circumstances such as trading
volume, news released about the underlying issuer, issuer performance, etc. Underlying market values may be priced via numerous aspects as certain securities are short term in nature and not
readily traded. Performance results are shown net of all fees and expenses and reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings.
Many factors affect performance including changes in market conditions and interest rates and in response to other economic, political, or financial developments. Investment involves risk including
the possible loss of principal. No assurance can be given that the performance objectives of a given strategy will be achieved. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Any financial and/or
investment decision may incur losses.
The investment advisor providing these services is Public Trust Advisors, LLC, an investment adviser registered with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940, as amended. Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Public Trust is required to maintain a written disclosure brochure of our background and business
experience. If you would like to receive a copy of our current disclosure brochure, Privacy Policy, or Code of Ethics, or have any questions regarding your account please contact us.
Public Trust Advisors
717 17th Street, Suite 1850
Denver, CO 80202
Page 12
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Portfolio Holdings
Portfolio Income
Portfolio Transactions
Issuer Concentration
Security Concentration
Portfolio Activity Summary
City of San Jacinto Detail
Page 13
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Month End Report Trade Date copySan Jacinto, City of (66779)Month End (M12 Y2020)12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020Dated: 01/11/2021Locked Down3.A.3.aPacket Pg. 63Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Holdings Report Trade Date (San Jacinto, City of (66779))1Income Detail Report Trade Date (San Jacinto, City of (66779))4Transactions Realized Gain Loss Report (San Jacinto, City of (66779))6Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade Date (San Jacinto, City of(66779))7Security Type GASB 40 Trade Date (San Jacinto, City of (66779))12Portfolio Activity Summary (San Jacinto, City of (66779))16Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/20213.A.3.aPacket Pg. 64Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Description,Identifier,Security Type,CouponEffective Maturity,Final Maturity,Callable,Next Call DateOriginal Cost,Current Units,Market PriceTrade Date,Settle DateMoodysRating,S&P Rating,Fitch RatingBook Value,Book Value + AccruedAccrued Balance,Net Unrealized Gain/LossMarket Value,Market Value + AccruedFEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION3135G0U92AGCY BOND2.62501/11/202201/11/2022N---129,906.40130,000.00102.562301/09/201901/11/2019AaaAA+---129,967.12131,578.581,611.463,363.92133,331.04134,942.50FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP3137EAEP0AGCY BOND1.50002/12/202502/12/2025N---299,769.00300,000.00104.902802/13/202002/14/2020AaaAA+---299,808.40301,545.901,737.5014,899.86314,708.26316,445.76FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS3130AJ7E3AGCY BOND1.37502/17/202302/17/2023N---299,448.00300,000.00102.589702/20/202002/21/2020AaaAA+---299,604.58301,139.991,535.428,164.46307,769.04309,304.45FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP3133ELWD2AGCY BOND0.37504/08/202204/08/2022N---334,504.20335,000.00100.328104/03/202004/08/2020AaaAA+---334,685.56334,975.19289.641,413.65336,099.20336,388.84FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS3130AJHU6AGCY BOND0.50004/14/202504/14/2025N---223,884.00225,000.00100.653604/15/202004/16/2020AaaAA+---224,040.98224,281.60240.632,429.63226,470.60226,711.23FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP3137EAEQ8AGCY BOND0.37504/20/202304/20/2023N---334,162.50335,000.00100.505504/17/202004/20/2020AaaAA+---334,357.08334,604.84247.762,336.28336,693.36336,941.12FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP3137EAER6AGCY BOND0.37505/05/202305/05/2023N---334,859.30335,000.00100.513405/05/202005/07/2020AaaAA+---334,890.07335,085.48195.421,829.79336,719.86336,915.28FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP3133ELG81AGCY BOND0.30006/08/202306/08/2023N---333,907.90335,000.00100.292706/05/202006/09/2020AaaAA+---334,112.10334,176.3164.211,868.30335,980.40336,044.61FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP3137EAEV7AGCY BOND0.25008/24/202308/24/2023N---234,760.30235,000.00100.197108/19/202008/21/2020AaaAA+---234,789.01235,001.16212.15674.27235,463.27235,675.43FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION3135G05X7AGCY BOND0.37508/25/202508/25/2025N---413,057.80415,000.0099.978108/25/202008/27/2020AaaAA+---413,190.55413,726.59536.041,718.50414,909.05415,445.09FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP3133EMGX4AGCY BOND0.12511/23/202211/23/2022N---219,579.80220,000.0099.973511/16/202011/23/2020AaaAA+---219,602.40219,631.4329.03339.19219,941.59219,970.62FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION3135G06H1AGCY BOND0.25011/27/202311/27/2023N---319,635.20320,000.00100.090211/23/202011/25/2020AaaAA+---319,647.56319,727.5680.00641.14320,288.70320,368.70EXXON MOBIL CORP30231GBB7CORP1.90208/16/202208/16/2022N---75,000.0075,000.00102.877108/13/201908/16/2019Aa1AA---75,000.0075,534.94534.942,157.8277,157.8277,692.76APPLE INC037833DE7CORP2.40012/13/202201/13/2023Y12/13/2022304,260.00300,000.00104.257212/10/201912/12/2019Aa1AA+---302,795.26306,155.263,360.009,976.30312,771.56316,131.56MICROSOFT CORP594918AT1CORP2.37502/01/202305/01/2023Y02/01/2023246,484.45235,000.00104.515604/28/202004/30/2020AaaAAA---243,700.41244,630.62930.211,911.22245,611.63246,541.84WALMART INC931142EK5CORP3.40005/26/202306/26/2023Y05/26/2023243,666.00225,000.00107.394404/29/202005/01/2020Aa2AA---239,629.52239,735.77106.252,007.79241,637.31241,743.56Holdings Report Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/202113.A.3.aPacket Pg. 65Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Description,Identifier,Security Type,CouponEffective Maturity,Final Maturity,Callable,Next Call DateOriginal Cost,Current Units,Market PriceTrade Date,Settle DateMoodysRating,S&P Rating,Fitch RatingBook Value,Book Value + AccruedAccrued Balance,Net Unrealized Gain/LossMarket Value,Market Value + AccruedPEPSICO INC713448FB9CORP0.40010/07/202310/07/2023N---84,951.5585,000.00100.550610/06/202010/07/2020A1A+---84,955.3585,034.6879.33512.6485,467.9885,547.32FHMS K-033 A23137B4WB8FHLMC3.06006/08/202307/25/2023Y---258,544.92250,000.00106.209912/12/201912/17/2019AaaAA+---255,905.03256,542.53637.509,619.70265,524.72266,162.22FHMS K-725 A2US3137BWWD24FHLMC3.00212/25/202301/25/2024Y---289,012.50280,000.00107.483612/12/201912/17/2019AaaAAA---286,617.47287,317.94700.4714,336.61300,954.08301,654.55FHMS K-024 A23137AXHP1FHLMC CMO2.57308/16/202209/25/2022Y---319,687.50320,000.00103.017705/02/201905/07/2019AaaAA+---319,571.60320,257.74686.1310,085.04329,656.64330,342.77FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y31846V203MMFUND0.01012/31/202012/31/2020N---37,509.9437,509.941.0000------AaaAAAm---37,509.9437,509.940.000.0037,509.9437,509.94UNITED STATES TREASURY912828XG0US GOV2.12506/30/202206/30/2022N---148,089.85150,000.00102.992202/13/201902/15/2019AaaAA+---149,133.00149,141.818.815,355.30154,488.30154,497.11UNITED STATES TREASURY912828W55US GOV1.87502/28/202202/28/2022N---98,101.56100,000.00102.031202/13/201902/15/2019AaaAA+---99,257.9299,895.01637.092,773.28102,031.20102,668.29UNITED STATES TREASURY912828V72US GOV1.87501/31/202201/31/2022N---313,621.88315,000.00101.890605/29/201905/31/2019AaaAA+---314,433.99316,905.632,471.646,521.40320,955.39323,427.03UNITED STATES TREASURY912828SF8US GOV2.00002/15/202202/15/2022N---314,778.52315,000.00102.097705/29/201905/31/2019AaaAA+---314,908.47317,288.092,379.626,699.28321,607.76323,987.37UNITED STATES TREASURY912828L57US GOV1.75009/30/202209/30/2022N---174,890.63175,000.00102.824206/26/201906/27/2019AaaAA+---174,941.61175,724.07782.455,000.74179,942.35180,724.80UNITED STATES TREASURY912828J76US GOV1.75003/31/202203/31/2022N---179,374.22180,000.00102.031207/09/201907/11/2019AaaAA+---179,710.84180,515.64804.813,945.32183,656.16184,460.97UNITED STATES TREASURY9128287C8US GOV1.75007/15/202207/15/2022N---370,925.00370,000.00102.500010/29/201910/30/2019AaaAA+---370,532.00373,523.172,991.178,718.00379,250.00382,241.17UNITED STATES TREASURY912828Y87US GOV1.75007/31/202407/31/2024N---351,162.11350,000.00105.476612/06/201912/10/2019AaaAA+---350,906.57353,469.752,563.1818,261.53369,168.10371,731.28UNITED STATES TREASURY912828YE4US GOV1.25008/31/202408/31/2024N---294,257.81300,000.00103.734412/06/201912/10/2019AaaAA+---295,512.43296,786.601,274.1715,690.77311,203.20312,477.37UNITED STATES TREASURY9128286Z8US GOV1.75006/30/202406/30/2024N---351,121.09350,000.00105.390612/06/201912/10/2019AaaAA+---350,868.92350,885.8416.9217,998.18368,867.10368,884.02UNITED STATES TREASURY912828W71US GOV2.12503/31/202403/31/2024N---340,404.49335,000.00106.246112/12/201912/17/2019AaaAA+---339,129.10340,947.901,818.8016,795.34355,924.43357,743.24Holdings Report Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/202123.A.3.aPacket Pg. 66Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
* Filtered By: Description ¹ "Payable" and Description ¹ "Receivable". * Weighted by: Market Value + Accrued.Description,Identifier,Security Type,CouponEffective Maturity,Final Maturity,Callable,Next Call DateOriginal Cost,Current Units,Market PriceTrade Date,Settle DateMoodysRating,S&P Rating,Fitch RatingBook Value,Book Value + AccruedAccrued Balance,Net Unrealized Gain/LossMarket Value,Market Value + AccruedUNITED STATES TREASURY912828V80US GOV2.25001/31/202401/31/2024N---188,837.30185,000.00106.390612/12/201912/17/2019AaaAA+---187,894.98189,636.891,741.928,927.63196,822.61198,564.53UNITED STATES TREASURY912828YE4US GOV1.25008/31/202408/31/2024N---376,012.50370,000.00103.734403/02/202003/04/2020AaaAA+---374,919.84376,491.321,571.488,897.44383,817.28385,388.76UNITED STATES TREASURY912828YY0US GOV1.75012/31/202412/31/2024N---166,500.00160,000.00105.933603/02/202003/04/2020AaaAA+---165,406.01165,413.757.734,087.75169,493.76169,501.49UNITED STATES TREASURY912828T91US GOV1.62510/31/202310/31/2023N---266,146.29255,000.00104.175806/05/202006/09/2020AaaAA+---264,305.75265,015.46709.701,342.54265,648.29266,357.99UNITED STATES TREASURY912828T26US GOV1.37509/30/202309/30/2023N---263,835.35255,000.00103.363306/05/202006/09/2020AaaAA+---262,335.30263,231.13895.831,241.11263,576.41264,472.24UNITED STATES TREASURY912828ZC7US GOV1.12502/28/202502/28/2025N---226,943.75220,000.00103.527306/05/202006/09/2020AaaAA+---226,120.92226,961.87840.951,639.14227,760.06228,601.01UNITED STATES TREASURY912828F21US GOV2.12509/30/202109/30/2021N---197,007.81200,000.00101.492212/17/201812/20/2018AaaAA+---199,177.93200,263.781,085.853,806.47202,984.40204,070.25UNITED STATES TREASURY91282CAN1US GOV0.12509/30/202209/30/2022N---274,914.06275,000.00100.003910/13/202010/14/2020AaaAA+---274,923.56275,011.3987.8387.16275,010.72275,098.55UNITED STATES TREASURY912828Z52US GOV1.37501/31/202501/31/2025N---130,966.80125,000.00104.500010/13/202010/14/2020AaaAA+---130,670.27131,389.53719.26-45.27130,625.00131,344.26UNITED STATES TREASURY912828ZW3US GOV0.25006/30/202506/30/2025N---253,894.34255,000.0099.746111/02/202011/04/2020AaaAA+---253,931.56253,933.321.76421.00254,352.55254,354.32UNITED STATES TREASURY912828ZT0US GOV0.25005/31/202505/31/2025N---233,971.88235,000.0099.808612/03/202012/04/2020AaaAA+---233,989.38234,041.0251.65560.83234,550.21234,601.86UNITED STATES TREASURY9128285R7US GOV2.62512/15/202112/15/2021N---250,664.06250,000.00102.378901/10/201901/15/2019AaaAA+---250,223.47250,529.96306.495,723.78255,947.25256,253.74------------08/16/202308/22/2023------11,103,012.5511,017,509.94---------AaaAA+---11,087,613.8111,125,196.9837,583.17234,734.8011,322,348.6111,359,931.78Holdings Report Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/202133.A.3.aPacket Pg. 67Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Identifier,DescriptionFinal MaturityEnding Current UnitsEarned InterestIncomeRealized Gain,Realized LossAccretion IncomeAmortization ExpenseMisc IncomeNet Earned IncomeInterest PaymentReceived,Ending Interest Due3135G05X7FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION08/25/2025415,000.00129.690.000.0032.400.000.00162.090.000.00912828ZW3UNITED STATES TREASURY06/30/2025255,000.0053.730.000.0019.900.000.0073.63318.750.00912828ZT0UNITED STATES TREASURY05/31/2025235,000.0045.190.000.0017.500.000.0062.680.000.003130AJHU6FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS04/14/2025225,000.0093.750.000.0018.830.000.00112.580.000.00912828ZC7UNITED STATES TREASURY02/28/2025220,000.00211.950.000.000.00-124.780.0087.170.000.003137EAEP0FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP02/12/2025300,000.00375.000.000.003.790.000.00378.800.000.00912828Z52UNITED STATES TREASURY01/31/2025125,000.00144.790.000.000.00-116.360.0028.430.000.00912828YY0UNITED STATES TREASURY12/31/2024160,000.00236.000.000.000.00-111.750.00124.251,400.000.00912828YE4UNITED STATES TREASURY08/31/2024300,000.00321.130.000.00101.680.000.00422.820.000.00912828YE4UNITED STATES TREASURY08/31/2024370,000.00396.060.000.000.00-113.180.00282.880.000.00912828Y87UNITED STATES TREASURY07/31/2024350,000.00515.960.000.000.00-20.640.00495.330.000.009128286Z8UNITED STATES TREASURY06/30/2024350,000.00516.240.000.000.00-20.260.00495.983,062.500.00912828W71UNITED STATES TREASURY03/31/2024335,000.00606.270.000.000.00-105.390.00500.880.000.00912828V80UNITED STATES TREASURY01/31/2024185,000.00350.650.000.000.00-76.850.00273.800.000.00US3137BWWD24FHMS K-725 A201/25/2024280,000.00700.470.000.000.00-198.200.00502.27700.470.003135G06H1FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION11/27/2023320,000.0066.670.000.0010.360.000.0077.020.000.00912828T91UNITED STATES TREASURY10/31/2023255,000.00354.850.000.000.00-280.500.0074.360.000.00713448FB9PEPSICO INC10/07/202385,000.0028.330.000.001.370.000.0029.700.000.00912828T26UNITED STATES TREASURY09/30/2023255,000.00298.610.000.000.00-226.620.0071.980.000.003137EAEV7FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP08/24/2023235,000.0048.960.000.006.690.000.0055.650.000.003137B4WB8FHMS K-033 A207/25/2023250,000.00637.500.000.000.00-215.640.00421.86637.500.00931142EK5WALMART INC06/26/2023225,000.00637.500.000.000.00-512.100.00125.403,825.000.003133ELG81FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP06/08/2023335,000.0083.750.000.0030.880.000.00114.63502.500.003137EAER6FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP05/05/2023335,000.00104.690.000.003.990.000.00108.680.000.00594918AT1MICROSOFT CORP05/01/2023235,000.00465.100.000.000.00-355.940.00109.170.000.003137EAEQ8FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP04/20/2023335,000.00104.690.000.0023.690.000.00128.380.000.003130AJ7E3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS02/17/2023300,000.00343.750.000.0015.390.000.00359.140.000.00037833DE7APPLE INC01/13/2023300,000.00600.000.000.000.00-117.990.00482.010.000.003133EMGX4FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP11/23/2022220,000.0022.920.000.0017.960.000.0040.880.000.00912828L57UNITED STATES TREASURY09/30/2022175,000.00260.820.000.002.810.000.00263.620.000.00Income Detail Report Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/202143.A.3.aPacket Pg. 68Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
* Filtered By: Description ¹ "Payable" and Description ¹ "Receivable". * Weighted by: Ending Market Value + Accrued.Identifier,DescriptionFinal MaturityEnding Current UnitsEarned InterestIncomeRealized Gain,Realized LossAccretion IncomeAmortization ExpenseMisc IncomeNet Earned IncomeInterest PaymentReceived,Ending Interest Due91282CAN1UNITED STATES TREASURY09/30/2022275,000.0029.280.000.003.730.000.0033.000.000.003137AXHP1FHMS K-024 A209/25/2022320,000.00686.130.000.00-6.010.000.00680.12686.130.0030231GBB7EXXON MOBIL CORP08/16/202275,000.00118.880.000.000.000.000.00118.880.000.009128287C8UNITED STATES TREASURY07/15/2022370,000.00545.450.000.000.00-28.670.00516.780.000.00912828XG0UNITED STATES TREASURY06/30/2022150,000.00268.660.000.0047.610.000.00316.271,593.750.003133ELWD2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP04/08/2022335,000.00104.690.000.0021.090.000.00125.780.000.00912828J76UNITED STATES TREASURY03/31/2022180,000.00268.270.000.0019.570.000.00287.830.000.00912828W55UNITED STATES TREASURY02/28/2022100,000.00160.570.000.0053.890.000.00214.450.000.00912828SF8UNITED STATES TREASURY02/15/2022315,000.00530.710.000.006.780.000.00537.480.000.00912828V72UNITED STATES TREASURY01/31/2022315,000.00497.540.000.0043.470.000.00541.000.000.003135G0U92FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION01/11/2022130,000.00284.380.000.002.650.000.00287.020.000.009128285R7UNITED STATES TREASURY12/15/2021250,000.00557.510.000.000.00-19.670.00537.843,281.250.00912828F21UNITED STATES TREASURY09/30/2021200,000.00403.114,957.030.00103.790.000.005,463.930.000.0031846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y12/31/202037,509.940.130.020.000.000.000.000.150.140.12------08/22/202311,017,509.9413,210.284,957.050.00603.81-2,644.530.0016,126.6116,007.990.12Income Detail Report Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/202153.A.3.aPacket Pg. 69Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
* Does not Lock Down. * Filtered By: Type = Buy or Type = Sell or Type = Call Redemption or Type = Put Redemption or Type = Corporate Action Sell or Type = Cash Transfer or Type = Maturity or Type = Coupon or Type = Principal Paydown or Type = Money Market Funds. * Weighted by: AbsoluteValue of Principal. * MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on the website have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity,due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for booking journal entries or reconciliation.IdentifierDescriptionCurrent UnitsTypeSettle DatePricePrincipalRealized Gain/LossAmount31846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y0.00Money Market Funds11/30/2020---0.000.000.133137AXHP1FHMS K-024 A20.00Coupon12/01/2020---0.000.00686.133137B4WB8FHMS K-033 A20.00Coupon12/01/2020---0.000.00637.50US3137BWWD24FHMS K-725 A20.00Coupon12/01/2020---0.000.00700.4731846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y0.13Buy12/02/20201.0000.130.00-0.1331846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y5,805.59Buy12/04/20201.0005,805.590.00-5,805.59912828F21UNITED STATES TREASURY-235,000.00Sell12/04/2020101.656-238,892.194,957.03239,783.93912828ZT0UNITED STATES TREASURY235,000.00Buy12/04/202099.563233,971.880.00-233,978.3431846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y502.50Buy12/08/20201.000502.500.00-502.503133ELG81FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP0.00Coupon12/08/2020---0.000.00502.5031846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y3,281.25Buy12/15/20201.0003,281.250.00-3,281.259128285R7UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon12/15/2020---0.000.003,281.25CCYUSDUS DOLLAR0.00Cash Transfer12/24/2020---0.000.00-104.1731846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y-104.17Sell12/24/20201.000-104.170.00104.17931142EK5WALMART INC0.00Coupon12/26/2020---0.000.003,825.0031846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y686.13Buy12/28/20201.000686.130.00-686.1331846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y5,162.97Buy12/28/20201.0005,162.970.00-5,162.9731846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y0.00Money Market Funds12/29/2020---0.000.000.0131846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y0.01Buy12/29/20201.0000.010.00-0.0131846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y0.02Buy12/30/20201.0000.020.00-0.0231846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y6,375.00Buy12/31/20201.0006,375.000.00-6,375.0031846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y0.00Money Market Funds12/31/2020---0.000.000.12912828XG0UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon12/31/2020---0.000.001,593.759128286Z8UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon12/31/2020---0.000.003,062.50912828YY0UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon12/31/2020---0.000.001,400.00912828ZW3UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon12/31/2020---0.000.00318.75------21,709.43---------16,789.124,957.030.10Transactions Realized Gain Loss ReportSan Jacinto, City of (66779)12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/202163.A.3.aPacket Pg. 70Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Apple Inc.Exxon Mobil CorporationFarm Credit SystemIdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue037833DE7CORPAPPLE INCApple Inc.300,000.00FixedY1.8961.9110.21112/13/202201/13/20233,360.00302,795.26306,155.26312,771.56316,131.562.762%037833DE7CORPAPPLE INCApple Inc.300,000.00FixedY1.8961.9110.21112/13/202201/13/20233,360.00302,795.26306,155.26312,771.56316,131.562.762%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue30231GBB7CORPEXXON MOBIL CORPExxon Mobil Corporation75,000.00FixedN1.5961.9020.12908/16/202208/16/2022534.9475,000.0075,534.9477,157.8277,692.760.681%30231GBB7CORPEXXON MOBIL CORPExxon Mobil Corporation75,000.00FixedN1.5961.9020.12908/16/202208/16/2022534.9475,000.0075,534.9477,157.8277,692.760.681%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue3133ELWD2AGCY BONDFEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPFarm Credit System335,000.00FixedN1.2660.4490.11604/08/202204/08/2022289.64334,685.56334,975.19336,099.20336,388.842.968%Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/202173.A.3.aPacket Pg. 71Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Federal Home Loan BanksFederal National Mortgage AssociationFreddie MacIdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue3133ELG81AGCY BONDFEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPFarm Credit System335,000.00FixedN2.4260.4100.18006/08/202306/08/202364.21334,112.10334,176.31335,980.40336,044.612.967%3133EMGX4AGCY BONDFEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPFarm Credit System220,000.00FixedN1.8910.2210.13911/23/202211/23/202229.03219,602.40219,631.43219,941.59219,970.621.943%---AGCY BONDFEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPFarm Credit System890,000.00FixedN1.8570.3780.14611/11/202211/11/2022382.87888,400.06888,782.93892,021.20892,404.077.878%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue3130AJ7E3AGCY BONDFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSFederal Home Loan Banks300,000.00FixedN2.0931.4380.15502/17/202302/17/20231,535.42299,604.58301,139.99307,769.04309,304.452.718%3130AJHU6AGCY BONDFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSFederal Home Loan Banks225,000.00FixedN4.2340.6010.34604/14/202504/14/2025240.63224,040.98224,281.60226,470.60226,711.232.000%---AGCY BONDFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSFederal Home Loan Banks525,000.00FixedN2.9991.0810.23601/16/202401/16/20241,776.04523,645.55525,421.59534,239.64536,015.684.718%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue3135G0U92AGCY BONDFEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONFederal National Mortgage Association130,000.00FixedN1.0082.6500.12901/11/202201/11/20221,611.46129,967.12131,578.58133,331.04134,942.501.178%3135G05X7AGCY BONDFEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONFederal National Mortgage Association415,000.00FixedN4.5990.4700.38008/25/202508/25/2025536.04413,190.55413,726.59414,909.05415,445.093.665%3135G06H1AGCY BONDFEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONFederal National Mortgage Association320,000.00FixedN2.8930.2880.21911/27/202311/27/202380.00319,647.56319,727.56320,288.70320,368.702.829%---AGCY BONDFEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONFederal National Mortgage Association865,000.00FixedN3.4150.7340.28206/12/202406/12/20242,227.50862,805.24865,032.74868,528.79870,756.297.671%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue3137AXHP1FHLMC CMOFHMS K-024 A2Freddie Mac320,000.00FixedY1.5932.5630.60208/16/202209/25/2022686.13319,571.60320,257.74329,656.64330,342.772.912%3137B4WB8FHLMCFHMS K-033 A2Freddie Mac250,000.00VariableY2.3531.9890.41606/08/202307/25/2023637.50255,905.03256,542.53265,524.72266,162.222.345%US3137BWWD24FHLMCFHMS K-725 A2Freddie Mac280,000.00VariableY2.8592.1240.41012/25/202301/25/2024700.47286,617.47287,317.94300,954.08301,654.552.658%3137EAEP0AGCY BONDFEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPFreddie Mac300,000.00FixedN3.9801.5160.30002/12/202502/12/20251,737.50299,808.40301,545.90314,708.26316,445.762.780%3137EAEQ8AGCY BONDFEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPFreddie Mac335,000.00FixedN2.2920.4590.15504/20/202304/20/2023247.76334,357.08334,604.84336,693.36336,941.122.974%Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/202183.A.3.aPacket Pg. 72Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Microsoft CorporationPepsiCo, Inc.U.S. BancorpUnited StatesIdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue3137EAER6AGCY BONDFEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPFreddie Mac335,000.00FixedN2.3330.3890.15605/05/202305/05/2023195.42334,890.07335,085.48336,719.86336,915.282.974%3137EAEV7AGCY BONDFEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPFreddie Mac235,000.00FixedN2.6360.2840.17508/24/202308/24/2023212.15234,789.01235,001.16235,463.27235,675.432.080%---------Freddie Mac2,055,000.00------2.5681.3280.31708/16/202309/02/20234,416.932,065,938.662,070,355.592,119,720.202,124,137.1318.722%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue594918AT1CORPMICROSOFT CORPMicrosoft Corporation235,000.00FixedY2.0410.5830.20202/01/202305/01/2023930.21243,700.41244,630.62245,611.63246,541.842.169%594918AT1CORPMICROSOFT CORPMicrosoft Corporation235,000.00FixedY2.0410.5830.20202/01/202305/01/2023930.21243,700.41244,630.62245,611.63246,541.842.169%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue713448FB9CORPPEPSICO INCPepsiCo, Inc.85,000.00FixedN2.7490.4190.20010/07/202310/07/202379.3384,955.3585,034.6885,467.9885,547.320.755%713448FB9CORPPEPSICO INCPepsiCo, Inc.85,000.00FixedN2.7490.4190.20010/07/202310/07/202379.3384,955.3585,034.6885,467.9885,547.320.755%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue31846V203MMFUNDFIRST AMER:GVT OBLG YU.S. Bancorp37,509.94FixedN0.0000.0100.01012/31/202012/31/20200.0037,509.9437,509.9437,509.9437,509.940.331%31846V203MMFUNDFIRST AMER:GVT OBLG YU.S. Bancorp37,509.94FixedN0.0000.0100.01012/31/202012/31/20200.0037,509.9437,509.9437,509.9437,509.940.331%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue912828XG0US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States150,000.00FixedN1.4842.5210.12806/30/202206/30/20228.81149,133.00149,141.81154,488.30154,497.111.364%912828W55US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States100,000.00FixedN1.1492.5280.12702/28/202202/28/2022637.0999,257.9299,895.01102,031.20102,668.290.901%912828V72US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States315,000.00FixedN1.0702.0440.12901/31/202201/31/20222,471.64314,433.99316,905.63320,955.39323,427.032.835%912828SF8US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States315,000.00FixedN1.1102.0260.13302/15/202202/15/20222,379.62314,908.47317,288.09321,607.76323,987.372.840%912828L57US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States175,000.00FixedN1.7211.7700.13109/30/202209/30/2022782.45174,941.61175,724.07179,942.35180,724.801.589%Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/202193.A.3.aPacket Pg. 73Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Walmart Inc.SummaryIdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue912828J76US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States180,000.00FixedN1.2341.8810.12003/31/202203/31/2022804.81179,710.84180,515.64183,656.16184,460.971.622%9128287C8US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States370,000.00FixedN1.5141.6550.12507/15/202207/15/20222,991.17370,532.00373,523.17379,250.00382,241.173.350%912828Y87US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States350,000.00FixedN3.4651.6750.21507/31/202407/31/20242,563.18350,906.57353,469.75369,168.10371,731.283.261%912828YE4US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States300,000.00FixedN3.5751.6730.22608/31/202408/31/20241,274.17295,512.43296,786.60311,203.20312,477.372.749%9128286Z8US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States350,000.00FixedN3.4101.6770.20406/30/202406/30/202416.92350,868.92350,885.84368,867.10368,884.023.258%912828W71US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States335,000.00FixedN3.1401.7330.19403/31/202403/31/20241,818.80339,129.10340,947.90355,924.43357,743.243.144%912828V80US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States185,000.00FixedN2.9721.7260.17201/31/202401/31/20241,741.92187,894.98189,636.89196,822.61198,564.531.738%912828YE4US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States370,000.00FixedN3.5750.8800.22608/31/202408/31/20241,571.48374,919.84376,491.32383,817.28385,388.763.390%912828YY0US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States160,000.00FixedN3.8800.8880.25812/31/202412/31/20247.73165,406.01165,413.75169,493.76169,501.491.497%912828T91US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States255,000.00FixedN2.7710.3280.14710/31/202310/31/2023709.70264,305.75265,015.46265,648.29266,357.992.346%912828T26US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States255,000.00FixedN2.6960.3210.14809/30/202309/30/2023895.83262,335.30263,231.13263,576.41264,472.242.328%912828ZC7US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States220,000.00FixedN4.0600.4490.27202/28/202502/28/2025840.95226,120.92226,961.87227,760.06228,601.012.012%912828F21US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States200,000.00FixedN0.7422.6870.12609/30/202109/30/20211,085.85199,177.93200,263.78202,984.40204,070.251.793%91282CAN1US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States275,000.00FixedN1.7440.1410.12309/30/202209/30/202287.83274,923.56275,011.39275,010.72275,098.552.429%912828Z52US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States125,000.00FixedN3.9620.2570.26601/31/202501/31/2025719.26130,670.27131,389.53130,625.00131,344.261.154%912828ZW3US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States255,000.00FixedN4.4710.3440.30706/30/202506/30/20251.76253,931.56253,933.32254,352.55254,354.322.246%912828ZT0US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States235,000.00FixedN4.3860.3480.29405/31/202505/31/202551.65233,989.38234,041.02234,550.21234,601.862.072%9128285R7US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States250,000.00FixedN0.9492.5290.13412/15/202112/15/2021306.49250,223.47250,529.96255,947.25256,253.742.261%---US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States5,725,000.00FixedN2.6171.3730.18309/03/202309/03/202323,769.105,763,233.845,787,002.945,907,682.545,931,451.6452.177%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue931142EK5CORPWALMART INCWalmart Inc.225,000.00FixedY2.3220.6650.30905/26/202306/26/2023106.25239,629.52239,735.77241,637.31241,743.562.134%931142EK5CORPWALMART INCWalmart Inc.225,000.00FixedY2.3220.6650.30905/26/202306/26/2023106.25239,629.52239,735.77241,637.31241,743.562.134%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue------------11,017,509.94------2.5741.1960.21908/16/202308/22/202337,583.1711,087,613.8111,125,196.9811,322,348.6111,359,931.78100.000%Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/2021103.A.3.aPacket Pg. 74Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
* Grouped by: Issuer Concentration. * Groups Sorted by: Issuer Concentration. * Filtered By: Description ¹ "Payable" and Description ¹ "Receivable". * Weighted by: Ending Market Value + Accrued, except Book Yield by Base Book Value + Accrued.Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/2021113.A.3.aPacket Pg. 75Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
AGCY BONDIdentifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued3135G0U92FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONAGCY BOND1.188%FixedN1.008AA+Aaa130,000.0001/11/202201/11/20222.6500.1291,611.46129,906.40129,967.12131,578.58133,331.04134,942.503133ELWD2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORPAGCY BOND2.961%FixedN1.266AA+Aaa335,000.0004/08/202204/08/20220.4490.116289.64334,504.20334,685.56334,975.19336,099.20336,388.843133EMGX4FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORPAGCY BOND1.936%FixedN1.891AA+Aaa220,000.0011/23/202211/23/20220.2210.13929.03219,579.80219,602.40219,631.43219,941.59219,970.623130AJ7E3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND2.723%FixedN2.093AA+Aaa300,000.0002/17/202302/17/20231.4380.1551,535.42299,448.00299,604.58301,139.99307,769.04309,304.453137EAEQ8FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPAGCY BOND2.966%FixedN2.292AA+Aaa335,000.0004/20/202304/20/20230.4590.155247.76334,162.50334,357.08334,604.84336,693.36336,941.123137EAER6FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPAGCY BOND2.966%FixedN2.333AA+Aaa335,000.0005/05/202305/05/20230.3890.156195.42334,859.30334,890.07335,085.48336,719.86336,915.283133ELG81FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORPAGCY BOND2.958%FixedN2.426AA+Aaa335,000.0006/08/202306/08/20230.4100.18064.21333,907.90334,112.10334,176.31335,980.40336,044.61Security Type GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/2021123.A.3.aPacket Pg. 76Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
CORPFHLMCIdentifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued3137EAEV7FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPAGCY BOND2.075%FixedN2.636AA+Aaa235,000.0008/24/202308/24/20230.2840.175212.15234,760.30234,789.01235,001.16235,463.27235,675.433135G06H1FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONAGCY BOND2.820%FixedN2.893AA+Aaa320,000.0011/27/202311/27/20230.2880.21980.00319,635.20319,647.56319,727.56320,288.70320,368.703137EAEP0FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPAGCY BOND2.786%FixedN3.980AA+Aaa300,000.0002/12/202502/12/20251.5160.3001,737.50299,769.00299,808.40301,545.90314,708.26316,445.763130AJHU6FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND1.996%FixedN4.234AA+Aaa225,000.0004/14/202504/14/20250.6010.346240.63223,884.00224,040.98224,281.60226,470.60226,711.233135G05X7FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONAGCY BOND3.657%FixedN4.599AA+Aaa415,000.0008/25/202508/25/20250.4700.380536.04413,057.80413,190.55413,726.59414,909.05415,445.09------AGCY BOND31.031%FixedN2.745AA+Aaa3,485,000.0010/11/202310/11/20230.6730.2116,779.243,477,474.403,478,695.393,485,474.643,518,374.393,525,153.63Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued30231GBB7EXXON MOBIL CORPCORP0.684%FixedN1.596AAAa175,000.0008/16/202208/16/20221.9020.129534.9475,000.0075,000.0075,534.9477,157.8277,692.76037833DE7APPLE INCCORP2.783%FixedY1.896AA+Aa1300,000.0012/13/202201/13/20231.9110.2113,360.00304,260.00302,795.26306,155.26312,771.56316,131.56594918AT1MICROSOFT CORPCORP2.170%FixedY2.041AAAAaa235,000.0002/01/202305/01/20230.5830.202930.21246,484.45243,700.41244,630.62245,611.63246,541.84931142EK5WALMART INCCORP2.128%FixedY2.322AAAa2225,000.0005/26/202306/26/20230.6650.309106.25243,666.00239,629.52239,735.77241,637.31241,743.56713448FB9PEPSICO INCCORP0.753%FixedN2.749A+A185,000.0010/07/202310/07/20230.4190.20079.3384,951.5584,955.3585,034.6885,467.9885,547.32------CORP8.518%Fixed---2.091AAAa2920,000.0002/22/202304/03/20231.1210.2265,010.73954,362.00946,080.53951,091.26962,646.29967,657.02Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued3137B4WB8FHMS K-033 A2FHLMC2.343%VariableY2.353AA+Aaa250,000.0006/08/202307/25/20231.9890.416637.50258,544.92255,905.03256,542.53265,524.72266,162.22US3137BWWD24FHMS K-725 A2FHLMC2.655%VariableY2.859AAAAaa280,000.0012/25/202301/25/20242.1240.410700.47289,012.50286,617.47287,317.94300,954.08301,654.55------FHLMC4.998%VariableY2.622AAAAaa530,000.0009/22/202310/31/20232.0600.4131,337.97547,557.42542,522.50543,860.47566,478.81567,816.77Security Type GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/2021133.A.3.aPacket Pg. 77Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
FHLMC CMOMMFUNDUS GOVIdentifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued3137AXHP1FHMS K-024 A2FHLMC CMO2.908%FixedY1.593AA+Aaa320,000.0008/16/202209/25/20222.5630.602686.13319,687.50319,571.60320,257.74329,656.64330,342.773137AXHP1FHMS K-024 A2FHLMC CMO2.908%FixedY1.593AA+Aaa320,000.0008/16/202209/25/20222.5630.602686.13319,687.50319,571.60320,257.74329,656.64330,342.77Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued31846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG YMMFUND0.330%FixedN0.000AAAmAaa37,509.9412/31/202012/31/20200.0100.0100.0037,509.9437,509.9437,509.9437,509.9437,509.9431846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG YMMFUND0.330%FixedN0.000AAAmAaa37,509.9412/31/202012/31/20200.0100.0100.0037,509.9437,509.9437,509.9437,509.9437,509.94Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued912828F21UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1.796%FixedN0.742AA+Aaa200,000.0009/30/202109/30/20212.6870.1261,085.85197,007.81199,177.93200,263.78202,984.40204,070.259128285R7UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.256%FixedN0.949AA+Aaa250,000.0012/15/202112/15/20212.5290.134306.49250,664.06250,223.47250,529.96255,947.25256,253.74912828V72UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.847%FixedN1.070AA+Aaa315,000.0001/31/202201/31/20222.0440.1292,471.64313,621.88314,433.99316,905.63320,955.39323,427.03912828SF8UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.852%FixedN1.110AA+Aaa315,000.0002/15/202202/15/20222.0260.1332,379.62314,778.52314,908.47317,288.09321,607.76323,987.37912828W55UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.904%FixedN1.149AA+Aaa100,000.0002/28/202202/28/20222.5280.127637.0998,101.5699,257.9299,895.01102,031.20102,668.29912828J76UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1.624%FixedN1.234AA+Aaa180,000.0003/31/202203/31/20221.8810.120804.81179,374.22179,710.84180,515.64183,656.16184,460.97912828XG0UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1.360%FixedN1.484AA+Aaa150,000.0006/30/202206/30/20222.5210.1288.81148,089.85149,133.00149,141.81154,488.30154,497.119128287C8UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3.365%FixedN1.514AA+Aaa370,000.0007/15/202207/15/20221.6550.1252,991.17370,925.00370,532.00373,523.17379,250.00382,241.17912828L57UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1.591%FixedN1.721AA+Aaa175,000.0009/30/202209/30/20221.7700.131782.45174,890.63174,941.61175,724.07179,942.35180,724.8091282CAN1UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.422%FixedN1.744AA+Aaa275,000.0009/30/202209/30/20220.1410.12387.83274,914.06274,923.56275,011.39275,010.72275,098.55912828T26UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.328%FixedN2.696AA+Aaa255,000.0009/30/202309/30/20230.3210.148895.83263,835.35262,335.30263,231.13263,576.41264,472.24Security Type GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/2021143.A.3.aPacket Pg. 78Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Summary * Grouped by: Security Type. * Groups Sorted by: Security Type. * Filtered By: Description ¹ "Payable" and Description ¹ "Receivable". * Weighted by: Ending Market Value + Accrued, except Book Yield by Base Book Value + Accrued.Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued912828T91UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.345%FixedN2.771AA+Aaa255,000.0010/31/202310/31/20230.3280.147709.70266,146.29264,305.75265,015.46265,648.29266,357.99912828V80UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1.748%FixedN2.972AA+Aaa185,000.0001/31/202401/31/20241.7260.1721,741.92188,837.30187,894.98189,636.89196,822.61198,564.53912828W71UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3.149%FixedN3.140AA+Aaa335,000.0003/31/202403/31/20241.7330.1941,818.80340,404.49339,129.10340,947.90355,924.43357,743.249128286Z8UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3.247%FixedN3.410AA+Aaa350,000.0006/30/202406/30/20241.6770.20416.92351,121.09350,868.92350,885.84368,867.10368,884.02912828Y87UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3.272%FixedN3.465AA+Aaa350,000.0007/31/202407/31/20241.6750.2152,563.18351,162.11350,906.57353,469.75369,168.10371,731.28912828YE4UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.751%FixedN3.575AA+Aaa300,000.0008/31/202408/31/20241.6730.2261,274.17294,257.81295,512.43296,786.60311,203.20312,477.37912828YE4UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3.393%FixedN3.575AA+Aaa370,000.0008/31/202408/31/20240.8800.2261,571.48376,012.50374,919.84376,491.32383,817.28385,388.76912828YY0UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1.492%FixedN3.880AA+Aaa160,000.0012/31/202412/31/20240.8880.2587.73166,500.00165,406.01165,413.75169,493.76169,501.49912828Z52UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1.156%FixedN3.962AA+Aaa125,000.0001/31/202501/31/20250.2570.266719.26130,966.80130,670.27131,389.53130,625.00131,344.26912828ZC7UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.012%FixedN4.060AA+Aaa220,000.0002/28/202502/28/20250.4490.272840.95226,943.75226,120.92226,961.87227,760.06228,601.01912828ZT0UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.065%FixedN4.386AA+Aaa235,000.0005/31/202505/31/20250.3480.29451.65233,971.88233,989.38234,041.02234,550.21234,601.86912828ZW3UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.239%FixedN4.471AA+Aaa255,000.0006/30/202506/30/20250.3440.3071.76253,894.34253,931.56253,933.32254,352.55254,354.32---UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV52.214%FixedN2.617AA+Aaa5,725,000.0009/03/202309/03/20231.3730.18323,769.105,766,421.295,763,233.845,787,002.945,907,682.545,931,451.64Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued---------100.000%------2.574AA+Aaa11,017,509.9408/16/202308/22/20231.1960.21937,583.1711,103,012.5511,087,613.8111,125,196.9811,322,348.6111,359,931.78Security Type GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/2021153.A.3.aPacket Pg. 79Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Identifier,Description,Security TypeInterest/DividendReceivedTransfers In/OutPurchasesPurchasedAccruedIncomeSalesDisposed AccruedMaturities andRedemptionsPaydownsNet RealizedGain/LossBeginning OriginalCost,Ending Original CostBeginning MarketValue,Ending Market Value31846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG YMMFUND0.140.0021,813.600.00-104.170.000.000.000.0215,800.5137,509.9415,800.5137,509.94CCYUSDReceivableCASH0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.130.120.130.12CCYUSDCashCASH0.00-104.170.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.003135G0U92FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00129,906.40129,906.40133,595.80133,331.049128285R7UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3,281.250.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00250,664.06250,664.06256,474.50255,947.25912828XG0UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1,593.750.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00148,089.85148,089.85154,705.05154,488.30912828W55UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0098,101.5698,101.56102,175.80102,031.203137AXHP1FHMS K-024 A2FHLMC CMO686.130.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00319,687.50319,687.50330,245.95329,656.64912828V72UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00313,621.88313,621.88321,447.73320,955.39912828SF8UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00314,778.52314,778.52322,222.95321,607.76912828L57UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00174,890.63174,890.63180,154.27179,942.35912828J76UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00179,374.22179,374.22183,867.12183,656.1630231GBB7EXXON MOBIL CORPCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0075,000.0075,000.0077,179.8877,157.829128287C8UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00370,925.00370,925.00379,611.49379,250.00912828Y87UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00351,162.11351,162.11369,250.00369,168.10912828YE4UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00294,257.81294,257.81311,156.40311,203.209128286Z8UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3,062.500.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00351,121.09351,121.09368,921.70368,867.10037833DE7APPLE INCCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00304,260.00304,260.00312,942.47312,771.56912828W71UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00340,404.49340,404.49356,225.27355,924.433137B4WB8FHMS K-033 A2FHLMC637.500.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00258,544.92258,544.92265,442.55265,524.72US3137BWWD24FHMS K-725 A2FHLMC700.470.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00289,012.50289,012.50300,265.45300,954.08Portfolio Activity SummarySan Jacinto, City of (66779)12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/2021163.A.3.aPacket Pg. 80Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Identifier,Description,Security TypeInterest/DividendReceivedTransfers In/OutPurchasesPurchasedAccruedIncomeSalesDisposed AccruedMaturities andRedemptionsPaydownsNet RealizedGain/LossBeginning OriginalCost,Ending Original CostBeginning MarketValue,Ending Market Value912828V80UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00188,837.30188,837.30196,952.67196,822.613137EAEP0FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00299,769.00299,769.00314,052.03314,708.263130AJ7E3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00299,448.00299,448.00307,769.59307,769.04912828YE4UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00376,012.50376,012.50383,759.56383,817.28912828YY0UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1,400.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00166,500.00166,500.00169,524.96169,493.763133ELWD2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00334,504.20334,504.20335,907.04336,099.203130AJHU6FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00223,884.00223,884.00226,264.18226,470.603137EAEQ8FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00334,162.50334,162.50336,493.03336,693.36594918AT1MICROSOFT CORPCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00246,484.45246,484.45246,073.08245,611.63931142EK5WALMART INCCORP3,825.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00243,666.00243,666.00242,067.53241,637.313137EAER6FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00334,859.30334,859.30336,618.89336,719.86912828T91UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00266,146.29266,146.29265,727.85265,648.293133ELG81FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPAGCY BOND502.500.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00333,907.90333,907.90335,367.10335,980.40912828T26UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00263,835.35263,835.35263,626.14263,576.41912828ZC7UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00226,943.75226,943.75227,691.42227,760.063137EAEV7FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00234,760.30234,760.30235,071.84235,463.273135G05X7FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00413,057.80413,057.80413,614.02414,909.05912828F21UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.00-238,892.19-891.740.000.004,957.03428,491.99197,007.81442,306.70202,984.40713448FB9PEPSICO INCCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0084,951.5584,951.5585,292.8485,467.98Portfolio Activity SummarySan Jacinto, City of (66779)12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/2021173.A.3.aPacket Pg. 81Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
* Weighted by: Ending Market Value + Accrued. * Holdings Displayed by: Lot.Identifier,Description,Security TypeInterest/DividendReceivedTransfers In/OutPurchasesPurchasedAccruedIncomeSalesDisposed AccruedMaturities andRedemptionsPaydownsNet RealizedGain/LossBeginning OriginalCost,Ending Original CostBeginning MarketValue,Ending Market Value91282CAN1UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00274,914.06274,914.06274,914.20275,010.72912828Z52UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00130,966.80130,966.80130,595.75130,625.00912828ZW3UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV318.750.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00253,894.34253,894.34254,083.53254,352.553133EMGX4FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00219,579.80219,579.80219,730.92219,941.593135G06H1FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00319,635.20319,635.20319,939.48320,288.70912828ZT0UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.00233,971.88-6.460.000.000.000.000.000.00233,971.880.00234,550.21---------16,007.99-104.17255,785.48-6.46-238,996.36-891.740.000.004,957.0511,078,815.5511,103,012.6711,305,129.3811,322,348.73Portfolio Activity SummarySan Jacinto, City of (66779)12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/2021183.A.3.aPacket Pg. 82Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
Additional Disclosure:This information is for the sole purposes of the client and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations. Please review the contents of this information carefully. Should you have any questions regarding theinformation presented, calculation methodology, investment portfolio, security detail, or any other facet of this information, please feel free to contact us.Public Trust Advisors, LLC (Public Trust) statements and reports are intended to detail our investment advisory activity as well as the activity of certain client accounts managed by Public Trust. The custodian bank maintainsthe control of assets and executes and settles all investment transactions. The custodian statement is the official record of security and cash holdings transactions. Public Trust recognizes that clients may use these reports tofacilitate record keeping; therefore, it is recommended that the client reconcile this information with their custodian bank statement. Many custodians use a settlement date basis that may result in the need to reconcile due to atiming difference. The underlying market value, amortized cost, and accrued interest may differ between the custodian and this statement or report. This can be attributed to differences in calculation methodologies and pricingsources used.Public Trust does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian. Our clients retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies, implementing and enforcing internal controls, andgenerating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions. The total market value represents prices obtained from various sources; it may be impacted by the frequency at which prices are reported, and such prices are notguaranteed. Prices received from pricing vendors are generally based on current market quotes but when such quotes are not available, the pricing vendors use a variety of techniques to estimate value. These estimates,particularly for fixed-income securities, may be based on certain minimum principal amounts (e.g. $1 million) and may not reflect all the factors that affect the value of the security including liquidity risk. The prices provided arenot firm bids or offers. Certain securities may reflect N/A or unavailable where the price for such security is generally not available from a pricing source. The market value of a security, including those priced at par value, maydiffer from its purchase price and may not closely reflect the value at which the security may be sold or purchased based on various market factors. The securities in this investment portfolio, including shares of mutual funds,are not guaranteed or otherwise protected by Public Trust, the FDIC (except for certain non-negotiable certificates of deposit), or any government agency unless specifically stated otherwise.Clients may be permitted to establish one or more unmanaged accounts for the purposes of client reporting. Clients may also be permitted to provide externally managed assets for the purposes of client reporting. Public Trustdefines unmanaged accounts or assets as one where the investment direction remains the sole responsibility of the client rather than the Investment Manager. Unmanaged accounts or external assets do not receive ongoingsupervision and monitoring services. The Investment Manager does not make any investment recommendations and may not charge a fee for reporting on these accounts or assets. The primary purpose for this service is toinclude unmanaged accounts or assets owned by the client in the performance reports provided by the Investment Manager. The Investment Manager assumes no liability for the underlying performance of any unmanagedaccounts or assets, and it is the client’s sole responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of any such performance.Beginning and ending balances are based on market value plus accrued interest on a trade date basis. Statements and reports made available to the end user either from Public Trust or through the online reporting platformmay present information and portfolio analytics using various optional methods including, but not limited to, historical cost, amortized cost, and market value. All information is assumed to be correct, but the accuracy has notbeen confirmed and therefore is not guaranteed to be correct. Information is obtained from third party sources that may or may not be verified. The data in this report is unaudited and is only applicable for the date denoted onthe report. Market values may change day-to-day based on numerous circumstances such as trading volume, news released about the underlying issuer, issuer performance, etc. Underlying market values may be priced vianumerous aspects as certain securities are short term in nature and not readily traded. Performance results are shown net of all fees and expenses and reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings.Many factors affect performance including changes in market conditions and interest rates and in response to other economic, political, or financial developments. Investment involves risk including the possible loss ofprincipal. No assurance can be given that the performance objectives of a given strategy will be achieved. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Any financial and/or investment decision may incur losses.The investment advisor providing these services is Public Trust Advisors, LLC, an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, asamended. Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Public Trust is required to maintain a written disclosure brochure of our background and business experience. If you would like to receive acopy of our current disclosure brochure, Privacy Policy, or Code of Ethics, or have any questions regarding your account please contact us.Public Trust Advisors717 17th St. Suite 1850Denver, CO 802023.A.3.aPacket Pg. 83Attachment: 2020-21 December Treasurers Report with signature (Treasurer’s Report at December 31,
February 2, 2021
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Stuart McKibbin, City Engineer
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Final Local Road Safety Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Local Road Safety Plan (LR SP) for receipt
and file.
DISCUSSION:
The City has been exploring ways to enhance access and safety for all modes of travel. For
example, in 2019, the Complete Streets Safety Assessment was completed with the goal of
recommending future projects at select locations and citywide policies that increase safety for all
modes of travel. The objectives of the LRSP creates a framework to systematically identify and
analyze safety problems and recommend safety improvements citywide. Funding for this
program was provided by a grant that the Engineering Department applied to from Caltrans.
In 2022, the LRSP will be required for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle
11. While not required for the current HSIP Cycle 10 application, the LRSP would improve the
competitiveness of the City’s projects. The LRSP supplies the City with a ready list to select
projects for other local, state, and federal grant applications. The LRSP also creates several
policy recommendations for implementation.
The final report consists of a safety analysis, countermeasure toolbox, emphasis area and
strategies, and an evaluation and implementation section that identifies areas in the City for street
improvements and policies that can be implemented. After a citywide evaluation from Fehr &
Peers, the following hot spot locations and collision types were selected as the top priorities for
the City using the Transportation Injury Mapping System data provided from UC Berkeley.
1. San Jacinto Avenue – Menlo Avenue to 7th Street
2. State Street – DeAnza Drive to 9th Street
3. Ramona Expressway – Lyon Avenue to Eagle Road
4. East Esplanade Avenue – Hewitt Street to Meridian Street
5. Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue
6. Nighttime Collisions involving Bicyclists and Pedestrians
7. Collisions involving alcohol
8. Broadside Collisions at Major Unsignalized Intersections
9. Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions near Schools
10. Collisions involving Pedestrians in Roadway
4.1
Packet Pg. 84
During the accompanying presentation, Fehr & Peers will present in detail the issues surrounding
the hot spot locations and collision types. Fehr & Peers will also share the other sections of the
report and be available for any questions during the presentation.
The Local Road Safety Plan will serve as guidance for selection of future Capital Imp rovement
Projects. The plan will also assist City staff with how to implement best practices in traffic
safety. The Local Road Safety Plan will be updated every 3-5 years to ensure that the plan keeps
up with the best practices in traffic safety and to reevaluate hot spot locations in the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no additional fiscal impact from adopting the final report.
ATTACHMENTS:
21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint Presentation)
21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report)
4.1
Packet Pg. 85
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (PowerPoint
LOCAL
ROAD
SAFETY
PLAN
January 2021
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
2 Engineer's Seal & Acknowledgments
SECTION 148 OF TITLE 23, UNITED STATES CODE
REPORTS DISCOVERY AND ADMISSION INTO EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN REPORTS, SURVEYS, AND INFORMATION —
Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose
relating to this section, shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or
considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at the location identified or addressed in the
reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.
Statement of Protection of Data from Discovery
and Admissions
This study applies a systemic safety approach that identifies certain features on particular roadways that are correlated with specific collision
types and frequencies. This broad approach is necessitated by the inherent nature of covering an entire agency’s facilities in one study and the
limited scope/budget available to prepare LRSPs. Limited time is available to perform field observations throughout the study area to contextualize
the data, and therefore, it is beyond the scope of work to perform in-depth “hot spot” evaluations at all locations.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 3
Acknowledgments
The 2020 City of San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety
Plan was funded through a Local Roadway Safety Plan
(LRSP) grant provided by the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans). Input was sought from an
advisory group consisting of staff from the City of San
Jacinto and partner public agencies. Fehr & Peers assisted
the City of San Jacinto in preparing the plan.
CALTRANS LRSP GRANT ID: LRSP071, LRSPL-5075(022)
ADVISORY
GROUP MEMBERS
Bernadette Reynolds
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
Brian Herritt
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
Gail Carlson
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
Kristin Warsinski
Riverside Transit Agency
Mauricio Alvarez
Riverside Transit Agency
Michael Castello
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
Michael Collins
San Jacinto Unified School District
Sergeant Michael Heath
San Jacinto Sheriff Department
Seth Heeren
San Jacinto Unified School District
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Stuart McKibbin
Tim Hamlin
Grace Alvarez
Bob Brady
FEHR & PEERS TEAM
Steve Brown, TE, RSP
Emily Finkel
Rachel Om
Claude Strayer, PE
Kendra Rowley, PE
Lee Reis
Saima Musharrat
Melody Wu
Erika Kulpa
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
4 Glossary & Table of Contents
Glossary
(A)ADT (annual) average daily traffic
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
AHSC Affordable Housing and
Sustainable Communities
ATP Active Transportation Program
AV Autonomous Vehicle
B/C Benefit/Cost
BTA Bicycle Transportation Account
BUILD Better Utilizing Investments to
Leverage Development
CDBG Community Development Block
Grant
CIP Capital Improvement Plan
CRF Crash Reduction Factor
CSSA Complete Streets Safety
Assessment
CVC California Vehicle Code
DOT Department of Transportation
DUI Driving Under the Influence
EMS Emergency Medical Services
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
GIS Geographic Information System
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement
Program
ITE Institute of Transportation
Engineers
KSI Killed or Severely Injured
LED Light-emitting Diode
LPI Leading Pedestrian Interval
LPP Local Partnership Program
LRSM Local Roadway Safety Manual
LRSP Local Road Safety Plan
LSRP Local Streets and Roads Program
LTF Local Transportation Fund
MUT Median U-Turn
MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices
OTS Office of Traffic Safety
PCF Primary Collision Factor
PHB Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
RCTC Riverside County Transportation
Commission
RCUT Restricted Crossing U-Turn
RRFB Rectangular Rapid Flashing
Beacon
RTA Riverside Transit Agency
SCAG Southern California Association of
Goverments
SGC Strategic Growth Council
SCCP Solution for Congested Corridors
Program
SJUSD San Jacinto Unified School District
SR2S/SRTS Safe Routes to School
STIP State Transportation Improvement
Program
SWITRS Statewide Integrated Traffic
Records System
TCC Transportation Climate
Communities
TDA Transit Development Act
TIGER Transportation Investment
Generating Economic Recovery
TIMS Transportation Injury Mapping
System
TMP Trails Master Plan
TNC Transportation Network Company
TUMF Transportation Uniform Mitigation
Fee
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
WRCOG Western Riverside Council of
Governments
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 5
6 Countermeasure Toolbox
7 Emphasis Areas and Strategies
8 Evaluation and Implementation
Table of Contents
7
11
13
17
21
37
71
95
1 Introduction
2 Vision and Goals
Overview of Safe System Approach and
Project Background
Summary of Safety Partners
Summary of Safety Vision and Goals for San Jacinto
Summary of the City's Safety Efforts
Summary of Safety Countermeasures Covering
Engineering, Education, Enforcement, Emergency Services
and Emerging Technology
Summary of 10 Priority Location Project
Recommendations
3 Safety Partners
Summary of Safety Analysis Results, including the Historic
Collision Landscape, Hot Spot Identification, and Development
of Crash Types through Systemic Analysis
4 Existing Efforts
5 Safety Analysis
3Acknowledgments
PAGE
Funding Opportunities, and Considerations for Implementation
and Evaluation of Safety Projects
State Street between
Sagecrest Drive and
Quandt Ranch Road
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Introduction
Chapter 1
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 7
The City of San Jacinto is committed
to prioritizing safety and decreasing/
eliminating the amount of traffic
related deaths and serious injuries on
City streets. This Local Road Safety
Plan (LRSP) proactively evaluates hot
spots throughout the City to identify
the proven countermeasures that can
be implemented through the current
and future Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP). This section defines the Safe
Systems approach, an idea which
underlies this LRSP, and provides
background on safety work in San
Jacinto.
What is the Safe System approach?
Each day, people are killed and seriously
injured on our roads. Crashes can
irreversibly change the course of human
lives, touching victims, their families and
loved ones, and society as a whole. Through
collective action on the part of all roadway
system stakeholders—from system
operators and vehicle manufacturers, to
law enforcement and everyday users—we
can move to a Safe System approach that
anticipates human mistakes, with the goal
of eliminating fatal & serious injuries for all
road users.
A Safe System acknowledges the
vulnerability of the human body – in terms
of the amount of kinetic energy transfer
a body can withstand – when designing
and operating a transportation network to
minimize serious consequences of crashes. Figure 01: The Safe System Approach
Source: Fehr & Peers for FHWA
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 18
According to the World Health Organization,
the goal of a Safe System is to ensure that if
crashes occur, they “do not result in serious
human injury.”1 A Safe System approach
addresses the five elements of a safe
transportation system – safe road users,
safe vehicles, safe speeds, safe roads, and
post-crash care – in an integrated manner,
through a wide range of interventions
(see Figure 1).
The Safe System approach to road safety
started internationally as part of the Vision
Zero proclamation that, from an ethical
standpoint, no one should be killed or
seriously injured on the road system.2,3 It is
founded on the principle that people make
mistakes, and that the road system should
be adapted to anticipate and accommodate
human mistakes and the physiological
and psychological limitations of humans.4
Countries that have adopted the Safe
System approach have had significant
success reducing highway fatalities, with
reductions in fatalities between
50 and 70%.5
The Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) and the Road to Zero Coalition’s
Safe Systems Explanation and Framework
articulate that to anticipate human mistakes,
a Safe System seeks to:
›Separate users in a physical space (e.g.,
sidewalks, dedicated bicycle facilities)
›Separate users in time (e.g., pedestrian
scramble, dedicated turn phases)
›Alert users to potential hazards
›Accommodate human injury tolerance
through interventions that reduce speed
or impact force
Creating a Safe System means shifting
a major share of the responsibility from
road users to those who design the road
transport system. “Individual road users
have the responsibility to abide by laws
and regulations”6 and do so by exhibiting
due care and proper behavior on the
transportation system. While road users are
responsible for their own behavior, this is a
shared responsibility with those who design,
operate, and maintain the transportation
network: including the automotive industry,
law enforcement, elected officials, and
government bodies.7 In a Safe System,
roadway system designers and operators
take on the highest level of ethical
responsibility.
Background
This will be the first comprehensive
safety plan for the City of San Jacinto.
The Complete Streets Safety Assessment
(CSSA) was completed in 2019, covering
four areas in the City. This LRSP builds on
the CSSA and provides the City and its
major stakeholders with a blueprint for a
safe and more accessible community. This
LRSP will assist the City when it applies
for safety infrastructure funding sources.
For example, the Cycle 11 Highway Safety
Improvement Program (HSIP) funding cycle
anticipated in 2022 will require an LRSP for
an agency to be eligible to apply for funds.
About San Jacinto
The City of San Jacinto, located in Riverside
County, is home to approximately 49,200
people.8 San Jacinto’s population is 54%
Latino, 32% non-Latino white, 6% Black,
4% Asian, 3% two or more races, and
1% non-Latino Native American. 43% of
residents speak a language other than
English at home. Approximately 18% of
San Jacinto residents are living in poverty,
with a citywide median household income
of $50,500.9 Some of the census tracts
within the City fall within the State of
California’s definition of Disadvantaged
Communities, based on health, economic
and environmental factors. Several of the
City’s census tracts are also in the lowest
quartile for healthcare access according
to the California Healthy Places Index,
including one tract in the 6th percentile.10
ITE Safe System
Framework: Focus on Safe
Speeds
The ITE Safe System framework
provides important context
for the focus on safe speeds
within a Safe System approach.
For vulnerable users speed
is a determining factor in
survivability – a human’s chance
of surviving being struck by a
vehicle increases from 20% at
40 miles per hour to 60% at
30 miles per hour to 90% at 20
miles per hour. Reducing speed
in the presence of vulnerable
users is a key Safe System
strategy. Approaches include:
• Physical roadway designs
(width, horizontal alignment)
to limit free flow speeds,
• Traffic calming treatments
that induce slower speeds,
• Traffic signal timing that
minimizes high speed flow,
• Traditional or automated
enforcement that discourages
speeding.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
9
Endnotes
1. World Health Organization (2011). Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/
roadsafety/decade_of_action/plan/plan_en.pdf, p. 9.
2. Johansson, R. (2009). Vision Zero - Implementing a policy for traffic safety. Safety Science, 47, 826-831.
3. Tingvall, C., & Haworth, N. (1999). An Ethical Approach to Safety and Mobility. Paper presented at the 6th ITE International
Conference Road Safety and Traffic Enforcement. 6-7 September 1999, Melbourne, Australia.
4. Belin, M.-Å., Tillgren, P., & Vedung, E. (2012). Vision Zero - a road safety policy innovation. International Journal of Injury
Control and Safety Promotion, 19, 171-179.
5. World Resources Institute (2018). Sustainable and Safe: A Vision and Guidance for Zero Road Deaths. Retrieved from https://
www.wri.org/publication/sustainable-and-safe-vision-and-guidance-zero-road-deaths
6. World Health Organization (2011). Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/
roadsafety/decade_of_action/plan/plan_en.pdf, p. 9.
7. World Health Organization (2011). Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/
roadsafety/decade_of_action/plan/plan_en.pdf
8. Census 2019 Population estimates
9. American Community Survey 2014-2018
10. https://map.healthyplacesindex.org/
Carroll Drive & Burns Lane
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Vision &
Goals
Chapter 2
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 11
SAN JACINTO SAFETY
VISION STATEMENT
Strive to eliminate
fatalities and serious
injuries on San
Jacinto’s streets by
making travel safer
for all modes of
transportation.
The San Jacinto vision statement was
developed at the first stakeholder meeting.
Stakeholders acknowledged that eliminating
all fatalities and serious injuries was a
challenging and aspirational vision but to
work towards anything less (e.g. reduce
fatalities and serious injuries) did not feel
acceptable because even one fatality or
serious injury was unacceptable. Therefore,
the stakeholder group suggested that noting
the City is striving to eliminate fatalities and
serious injuries would create a strong vision
to shift roadway safety culture in the city,
while also acknowledging the challenging
nature of achieving the vision. The vision
statement also calls out the importance
of safety for all modes of transportation
to foster a multi-modal transportation
system where investments are made for all
modes and the responsibility for safe and
responsible behavior is on all road users.
The City’s vision statement sets a concise
yet comprehensive goal to guide the City’s
investments in infrastructure, education,
emergency services, and enforcement.
The following goals were identified to support and guide the City’s efforts
in achieving its vision:
GOAL 1
Reduce the number of collisions involving people walking and biking, with
separated bike and pedestrian facilities and increased driver awareness of
people walking and biking.
GOAL 2
Improve the visibility of people walking, biking, and driving at night.
GOAL 3
Encourage people to drive at lower speeds with roadway design and
signage.
GOAL 4
Increase motorists’ awareness of curves along the roadway.
GOAL 5
Discourage people from driving under the influence through educational
and enforcement programs, and decrease the severity of DUI collisions
through roadway infrastructure enhancements.
GOAL 6
Foster a citywide culture of safety where all road users have shared
responsibility.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Safety
Partners
Chapter 3
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 13
The City is excited to have engaged
stakeholders representing the four E’s
(engineering, enforcement, education,
and emergency medical services) and
tribal governments to address the
unique traffic safety concerns in the
San Jacinto Valley.
›Soboba Tribal Administration, Soboba
Band of Luiseño Indians – The Soboba
people inhabited the area that includes
San Jacinto prior to Mexican and American
settlement, and the Soboba Indian
Reservation is adjacent to the City.
The Soboba Tribal Administration has
multiple departments that are related to
transportation safety, including Public
Works, Public Safety, and Parks and
Recreation. The Tribal Administration also
recently received an Active Transportation
Program (ATP) planning grant from
the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG).
›San Jacinto Unified School District
(SJUSD) – Transportation habits
are informed by our experiences as
children, and schools are important
partners in cultivating positive and safe
transportation experiences for young
people and families. Schools are also
areas of concentrated activity during
arrival and dismissal times, so including
schools in safety conversations can lead to
recommendations for improvements near
schools.
›San Jacinto Sheriff’s Department –
Law enforcement is the core partner
representing the E of enforcement. Sworn
officers provide valuable input into current
behavior that they observe on the roads,
and are important partners in safety
conversations so that jurisdictions can
focus enforcement time on behaviors that
are most closely associated with injuries
and fatalities.
San Jacinto Avenue,
south of Midway Street
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 314
›Riverside Transit Agency – Transit
agencies expand mobility options for
residents and provide a transportation
option with professional drivers who
are almost always safer than individuals
driving cars. Transit agencies also bring a
perspective to safety conversations based
on their vehicles driving many miles on
local streets. The Riverside Transit Agency
provides transit service in San Jacinto,
with four routes within the City.
›Riverside County Public Health
Department – public health departments
often run or are involved in safety
programs that are directly related to
transportation. The Riverside County
Public Health Department has partnered
with city and county public works
departments to secure more than
$2.5 million in infrastructure and non-
infrastructure Safe Routes to School
(SRTS) funding. It was also a partner
for the Envision San Jacinto program
described in the Existing Efforts chapter.
FIRST STAKEHOLDER MEETING
At the first stakeholder meeting on August
27, 2020, the group discussed the safety
vision, priorities, and existing conditions in
San Jacinto. As shown in Figure 1, roadway
safety near schools was indicated as the
top priority for two thirds of respondents,
which was the most popular response.
Relatedly, meeting attendees requested
that this report includes an analysis by age.
Five categories tied for the second-most
popular safety priority with votes from half
of respondents: Bicyclists, Crosswalks,
Impaired Driving, Pedestrians, and Speed.
Representatives from the Soboba Band
of Luiseño Indians noted concerns about
lighting, blind curves, and sidewalks on
Soboba Road near the Soboba Reservation
and casino.
SECOND STAKEHOLDER MEETING
At the second stakeholder meeting on
November 3, 2020, the group discussed the
proposed safety countermeasure toolbox
for both engineering and non-engineering
strategies, as well as the proposed emphasis
areas and next steps for the project.
Feedback from this group included:
›Median barriers could be helpful at
schools to prevent parents from dropping
off students across the street.
›The City has a process to upgrade/update
intersection pavement markings, on an
as-needed basis and whenever the City is
rehabbing a street.
›The use of high-visibility crosswalks is
supported by the schools and transit
agencies.
›For raised crosswalks, working with
emergency services is recommended to
identify appropriate locations.
TOTAL VOTES
NearSchools
Bicyclists Impaired DrivingCrosswalks Pedestrians Speed
Lighting
Near Parks
Red light or stop sign running Sidewalks
Enforcement Near Shops OlderPeople Younger People
Traveling at Night
Other
Figure 02: Initial Stakeholder Meeting Priorities
Source: Fehr & Peers
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 15
State Street & Ramona Boulevard
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Existing
Efforts
Chapter 4
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 17
In recent years, the City’s efforts
to improve safety have been most
visible through a range of plans and
programs. In 2019, the City finished a
Complete Streets Safety Assessment,
which included a benchmarking
analysis of programs, policies, and
practices for pedestrian and bicyclist
safety. That plan highlighted some
key strengths described in this
section.
Trails Master Plan
The City published an updated Trails
Master Plan (TMP) in 2018 detailing existing
walking, biking, and multi-use paths within
San Jacinto’s streets and open spaces. The
TMP includes existing conditions for areas
demographics, land use, activity centers,
transit, health and more. The analysis of
pedestrian and bicycle collisions found
that they both had peaks in 2016 (the most
recent data available at that time), and that
29% of those collisions resulted in severe
or fatal injuries. The health and equity
index summary found that San Jacinto has
a higher pollution burden compared to
Riverside County and the State of California.
The TMP provides 38 improvements ranked
using various inputs, recommendations on
how to successfully implement and maintain
the proposed corridor improvements, and
potential infrastructure funding sources to
finance enhancements.
Safe Routes to School
San Jacinto embarked on a citywide Safe
Routes to School (SRTS) Plan in 2016. The
plan aims to create safer and enjoyable
options for walking and bicycling to and
from school within the city. SRTS plans
contain both infrastructure and program-
bases recommendations that the city,
local organizations, the school district,
and other community members can
use to improve the school’s surrounding
environment. The San Jacinto SRTS contains
designated Safe Routes to School corridors
that are optimized with infrastructure
improvements. These routes may connect
City of
SAN JACINTO
Demonstration Project
Envision San Jacinto brought the community together
to experience a temporary pedestrian plaza on
Main Street and test out safety improvements. The
event featured improvements including nine creative
crosswalks designed by San Jacinto Unified School
District (SJUSD) students, a parklet by Riverside
University Health System-Public Health, interactive
chalk art by Mount San Jacinto College Art Club, curb
extensions, placemaking and play features. The event
also included a mural by SJUSD, a bike rodeo, and
exercise demonstrations from local studios.
September 29, 2018
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 418
one or more schools and provide students
and families options for multi-modal travel
to and from their schools. The City offered
pedestrian and bicycle safety education
through SRTS, including youth safety
projects in schools funded through Office of
Transportation Safety (OTS) grants. Youth
were provided with bicycle helmets and
instructed in safe methods for
crossing streets.
Engagement
The City conducted outreach as part of
the Active Transportation Program and the
General Plan update process. For the TMP,
in addition to hosting meetings at schools
and other public venues, an online feedback
portal allowed members of the public to
submit feedback digitally.
In September 2018, the City partnered
with SCAG and a Community Advisory
Committee for an event called Envision San
Jacinto, part of SCAG’s Go Human Active
Transportation Safety and Encouragement
Campaign. This demonstration project
featured nine creative crosswalks designed
by SJUSD students, a parklet by Riverside
University Health System-Public Health,
interactive chalk art by Mount San
Jacinto College Art Club, curb extensions,
placemaking, and play features. It also
included a mural by SJUSD, a bike rodeo, and
exercise demonstrations from local studios.
The event attracted over 1,000 attendees
and collected over 200 surveys that showed
support for many of the demonstration
elements, along with a desire for well
maintained and clean sidewalks, sidewalk
lighting, more bike lanes, and separated and
protected bike lanes.
Enforcement
For the last five years, the City has used
OTS grants to patrol for pedestrian
violations by drivers, bicyclists, and
pedestrians, finding that violations are fairly
evenly distributed throughout the City.
In 2019, the City conducted a speed survey
to update speed limits on 44 roadway
segments in San Jacinto. As a result of this
survey, speed limits were increased at 13
locations and decreased at five locations,
and no change to the remaining 26 locations.
Since the speed limit is primarily based
on the current speeds of drivers under
California law, it is common for speed limits
to increase after speed surveys when there
have been limited roadway changes.
Infrastructure
The following existing infrastructure
conditions and recent projects support
safety within the City:
›In San Jacinto, a majority of intersections
have pedestrian curb ramps.
›Safety improvements along Sanderson
Avenue between Ramona Expressway
and Cottonwood Avenue, including:
rumble strips, speed radar signs, crush
attenuators around power poles, and
shoulder improvements. Construction of
these improvements is underway
as of 2020.
›The San Jacinto Valley Connect project,
funded by ATP Cycle 2 and completed
in 2020 provided for sidewalks and
new bicycle facilities on Chase Street,
Sagecrest Drive, College entrance,
Community College Drive, Eagle Drive,
Idyllwild Drive, Young Street, and Palm
Avenue.
›Pedestrian upgrades and pedestrian push-
button installation throughout the City
utilizing HSIP Cycle 5 and 6 funding.
›Upgrading approximately 2,000
streetlights to light emitting diodes (LEDs)
to improve night visibility in 2019.
›Construction of a raised two-way Class
IV Cycle Track on Young Street adjacent
to the De Anza Elementary School and
Mountain View High School
a few years ago.
›A new traffic signal and intersection
improvements at the Ramona Boulevard &
Sanderson Avenue intersection in 2017.
›Various pedestrian improvements along
Main Street more than two decades ago.
These improvements included angled
parking, pedestrian bulb-outs for shorter
pedestrian crossings, and additional
lighting.
›Narrowing of the pedestrian crossing
distance on North Ramona Boulevard
between Monte Vista Avenue and South
Grand Army Avenue with a concrete
sidewalk extension near the Monte Vista
Middle School and San Jacinto Elementary
School, about a decade ago.
There are also several planned
infrastructure projects that support safety
within the City as part of the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP), including:
›Citywide Traffic Signal Upgrades,
Phase 1: upgrading outdated traffic
control devices and installing new signal
equipment, including battery back-ups.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 19
›Citywide Traffic Signal Upgrades, Phase
2: traffic signal timing updates, as well
as electrical wiring upgrades at State
Street & Seventh Street, State Street &
Esplanade Avenue, and Hewitt Street &
Esplanade Avenue.
›A new traffic signal at San Jacinto Avenue
& Shaver Street: funded through a
Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP) grant.
›Cottonwood Widening and Sidewalk:
of installing approximately 4,100 linear
feet of sidewalk, and a potential new
pedestrian signal at Center Grove Way.
›Lyon Avenue Improvements: enhanced
access to the proposed adjacent school
site.
›Artesia Street Corridor Rehabilitation:
pavement rehabilitation, sidewalk
installation, and curb and gutter
improvements.
›San Jacinto Avenue Safety
Improvements: sidewalk installation,
lighting improvements, and mid-block
crossing enhancement.
›Hewitt Street Rehab: will include the
addition of a bike lane.
The City is currently in the planning stage
for interconnecting and coordinating existing
traffic signals at the following locations:
›San Jacinto Avenue & 7th Street
›San Jacinto Avenue & Shaver Street
›San Jacinto Avenue & Esplanade
The Complete Streets Safety Assessment
(CSSA) completed in 2019 noted
infrastructure recommendations at the
following locations:
›San Jacinto Avenue & Midway Street:
sidewalk installation, sidewalk widening,
and roadway lighting on approaches;
consider signalizing the intersection and
installing high visibility crosswalks; and
installing Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons to
the north and south of the intersection
to reduce the distance between marked
crossings.
›San Jacinto Avenue between Esplanade
Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue:
restriping to narrow curb lanes; installing
sidewalks to fill gaps; various intersection
improvements at San Jacinto Avenue
& Commonwealth Avenue to improve
pedestrian visibility; and installing a
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon to the north of
Commonwealth Avenue.
›San Jacinto Avenue & 7th Street:
centerline hardening; upgrading
crosswalks; reducing curb radii and
installing dual curb ramps; and installing
a bicycle facility along 7th Street. This
project will be completed with the
installation of the signal at San Jacinto &
Shaver.
›Megan Cope Elementary School: widening
sidewalks; installing new sidewalks; and
various reconfigurations for curbside
parking and loading.
State Street & Ramona Boulevard
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Safety
Analysis
Chapter 5
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 21
Chapter 2 of Caltrans’ Local Roadway
Safety Manual (LRSM) instructs
safety practitioners to “consider a
wide range of data sources to get an
overall picture of the safety needs.”
Crash data and contextual data were
collected and analyzed as part of
this plan, as well as anecdotal input
from City staff and community
stakeholders.
This section summarizes the results
of a broad collision analysis for
the City of San Jacinto, which will
inform the project prioritization and
countermeasures for the City. This
analysis considers injury collisions
from 2015 through 2019 available
through the Transportation Injury
Mapping System (TIMS) as of
August 4, 2020.
TIMS reports injury collisions from the
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records
System (SWITRS). Collision databases have
been found to have certain reporting biases,
including:
›Collision involving people walking, on
bicycles, or on motorcycles are less likely
to be reported than collisions with people
driving
›Property damage collision are less likely
to be reported compared to more severe
collisions
›Younger victims are less likely to report
collisions
›Alcohol-involved collisions may be under-
reported
Race, income, immigration status, and
English proficiency may also impact
reporting, but there is limited research on
these factors.
With those caveats in mind, this analysis
identified several collision trends and risk
factors in San Jacinto, including:
›People walking and biking are more likely
to be fatally or severely injured.
›Drugs or alcohol increase the likelihood
that a collision will be more severe
›A large share of injuries to people walking
occur when people are crossing not in a
crosswalk or walking in the road
›A much larger share of KSI collisions occur
at night where there are no streetlights
Table 01 provides a summary of collisions by
mode and severity within the 5-year dataset.
Caltrans’ Local Roadway
Safety Manual (LRSM)
Chapter 2 of Caltrans’ LRSM
states that safety practitioners
should “consider a wide range
of data sources to get an overall
picture of the safety needs”
(p. 14).
Both collision data and
contextual data were collected
and analyzed as part of this plan.
Note: Collision data for 2018 and
2019 was considered provisional
and subject to change at the time
this analysis was conducted.
Collisions
Vehicle Bike Ped Total
Total 849 66 60 975
Fatal or Severe 75 7 28 110
Table 01: Collision Summary
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 52222
Collisions by Year by Mode
From 2015 to 2019, there were 975 total
injury collisions, and 110 collisions where
victims were killed or severely injured (KSI).
On average, seven people are killed each
year in San Jacinto by traffic violence. The
number of collisions for each year by mode
in the figure to the right.
Collisions by Mode
People walking and biking are involved in 13
percent of total collisions but 31 percent of
KSI collisions, as shown in the figure to the
right. People walking are particularly over-
represented in KSI collisions, as they are
involved in only 6 percent of all collisions but
25 percent of KSI collisions.
Figure 03: Collisions by Year by Mode, 2015-2019
Figure 04: Collisions by Mode, 2015-2019
Killed or Severely Injured
in a Collision
Severe injuries resulting from
a traffic collision can result in a
number of catastrophic impacts,
including permanent disability,
lost productivity and wages, and
ongoing healthcare costs. These
injuries can include:
• Broken or fractured bones
• Dislocated or distorted limbs
• Severe lacerations
• Severe burns
• Skull, spinal, chest or
abdominal injuries
• Unconsciousness at or when
taken from the collision scene
Throughout this plan, the
acronym KSI is used to denote
collisions where someone was
killed or severely injured.
NUMBER OF COLLISIONS
Pedestrian Bicycle Vehicle
%
%
%%%
%
Pedestrian
Bicycle
ALL COLLISIONS KSI COLLISIONS
Vehicle
Pedestrian collisions
in San Jacinto
disproportionately
result in a fatality or
severe injury.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 23San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 23
Collision Type
The three most common collision types
in San Jacinto are Broadside (36%), Rear
End (30%), and Hit Object (9%), shown in
the figure to the right. For KSI collisions,
Broadside collisions and Vehicle/Pedestrian
collisions are tied for most common (25%),
with Hit Object collisions again the third-
most common (17%). This further illustrates
the disproportionate share pedestrians
make of KSI collisions in the City. It also
shows that Hit Object collisions are more
likely, compared to other collision types, to
result in a KSI.
Driving Under the Influence
Drugs or alcohol increase the likelihood that
a collision will be more severe in San Jacinto.
While 11 percent of all collisions involve
drugs or alcohol, 27 percent of KSI collisions
involve drugs or alcohol.
Figure 05: Collisions by Collision Type, 2015-2019
Figure 06: Collisions by Driving Under the Influence, 2015-2019
% OF COLLISIONS
Broadside Read End Hit Object Head-On Sideswipe OtherVehicle/Pedestrian
All Collisions KSI Collisions
Drivers in
All Collisions
Drivers in
KSI collisions
11%
were under the influencewere under the influence
27%
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 524 24
Primary Collision factor
In San Jacinto, the most common PCFs
are Unsafe Speed (29%), Vehicle Right of
Way Violation (18%), Improper Turning
(14%), and Traffic Signals and Signs (14%),
as shown in the figure. For KSI collisions,
the most common PCFs are Pedestrian
Violation (19%), Improper Turning (18%),
and Driving/Bicycling Under the Influence
(13%). The Pedestrian Violation PCF
indicates that the pedestrian violated a rule
of the road, such as crossing outside of a
crosswalk, as opposed to the Pedestrian
Right of Way Violation PCF (4%), where
the vehicle violates the pedestrian’s right
of way. The Pedestrian Violation category
overrepresentation in the data may be
reflective of lack of clear information related
to collision circumstances.
Pedestrian Location
A large share of injuries to people walking
occur when people are crossing not in a
crosswalk or walking in the road. Collisions
with people walking most frequency involved
pedestrian crossing not in a crosswalk
(37%), followed by pedestrians in the road,
including the shoulder (35%), as shown in
the figure. For KSI collisions, pedestrians
crossing not in a crosswalk are an even
higher percentage (43%), again followed
by pedestrians in the road, including the
shoulder (32%). People crossing the street
outside of crosswalks and walking in the
road may indicate that there are unmet
pedestrian desire lines, and could be
evaluated to identify potential locations for
new crosswalks and sidewalks.
Figure 07: Collisions by Primary Collision Factor, 2015-2019
Figure 08: Pedestrian Action Preceding Collision, 2015-2019
% OF COLLISIONS
Unsafe Speed
Vehicle Right of Way Violation
Improper Turning
Trac Signals & Signs
Pedestrian Violation
Wrong Side of Road
Unknown
Unsafe Lane Change
Other Than Driver (or Pedestrian)
Pedestrian Right of Way Violation
Unsafet Starting or Backing
Improper Passing
Driving/Bicycling Under the Influence
All Collisions KSI Collisions
% OF COLLISIONS
Crossing in Crosswalk
At Intersection
Crossing
Not in Crosswalk
In Road,
including Shoudler
Not in Road
All Collisions KSI Collisions
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 25San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 25
Lighting Conditions
Time of Day
A much larger share of KSI collisions occur
at night where there are no streetlights.
Collisions between 6 PM and 6 AM are 32
percent of all collisions but 58 percent of KSI
collisions, as shown in the figure.
Street Lighting
Areas noted without streetlights represent
25 percent of all overnight collisions but 40
percent of KSI collisions, shown in the figure.
Crashes overnight disproportionately affect
people walking, with 48 percent of people
walking injured overnight.
Figure 09: Collisions by Time of Day, 2015-2019
Figure 10: Collisions in the Dark by Lighting, 2015-2019
% OF COLLISIONS
–am –6am 6–am am–pm –pm –6pm 6–pm pm–am
All Collisions KSI Collisions
% OF COLLISIONS
With Street Lights No Street Lights
All Collisions KSI Collisions
Nighttime collisions
in San Jacinto are
more likely than
daytime collisions to
result in a fatality or
severe injury.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 526 26
Victim Profile
Vulnerable age groups have not experienced
a disproportionate share of crashes in San
Jacinto. People under the age of 15 are
32 percent of the City’s population but
represent less than 10 percent of all injury
and KSI injury crashes. People 65 years and
older are 14 percent of the City’s population
but represent 10 percent of all injury crashes
and 12 percent of KSI crashes.
People identified as Black, white, and other
race are over-represented in crashes, as
shown in the figure, although it is important
to note that race is determined at the
discretion of the reporting office and
is only reported at the party level. This
means that if people of multiple races are
present in a vehicle, only the driver’s race
will be reported. People identified as Black
represent 11 percent of victims, but only
6 percent of the population of San Jacinto.
People identified as “Other” for race by the
reporting officer represent 6 percent of
victims, but only 4 percent of the population
of San Jacinto. And people identified as
White represent 34 percent of victims, but
only 32 percent of the population of San
Jacinto. As noted at the beginning of this
section, race, income, immigration status,
and English proficiency may impact collision
reporting, but there is limited research
on these factors. In San Jacinto, 21% of
residents are foreign-born and 90%
are citizens.
Figure 11: Parties and Victims by Race compared to Census Data, 2015-2019
Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey (ACS) 2018 5-year estimate.
% OF COLLISIONS
Asian Black Hispanic White Other Not Stated
CensusAll VictimsParties
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 27San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 27
.Miles
All Injury Collisions (2015 - 2019)
Fatal Collisions (32)
Severe Injury Collisions (78)
Other Injury Collisions (865)
Idyllwild Dr
7th St
Washington Ave
1st StSanderson AveLyons AveState StSan Jacinto AveSanta Fe AveHewitt StMain St
De Anza Dr
N Warren RdRamona Blvd
Ramona Ex
p
y
Cottonwood Ave
W Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
7th St
Ra
mo
n
a
Ex
py
S
o
boba RdPark Ave
79
E Es
p
l
anade Ave
ALL INJURY COLLISION LOCATIONS2015-2019
Figure 12
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 52828
Systemic Analysis
Systemic analysis is a proactive
safety approach that focuses on
evaluating an entire roadway
network using a defined set of
criteria. It looks at collision history
on an aggregate basis to identify
high-risk roadway characteristics
in addition to looking at high
collision locations.
By merging adjacent road and
intersection features with
collision data, relationships can
be uncovered between contextual
factors and the risk of frequent
and severe collisions. This systemic
process relied on a twofold
approach to identify key safety
issues and locations to prioritize hot
spot analysis and development of
collision types.
Collision Typing
In developing systemic analysis, it is
important to understand the relationship
between collision characteristics and
the contextual characteristics of the
collision location. A systemic matrix
illustrating the number of collisions at the
intersection of a collision characteristic
(e.g. location of pedestrian) and a
contextual characteristic (e.g. posted
speed of roadway) was identified. Each
combination of a collision characteristic
and a contextual characteristic
represents a collision type. The highest
occurring collision types and collision
types with the largest share of severe
collisions were mapped and considered
for further study. This process evaluates
risk across the entire roadway system,
rather than only managing risk at certain
locations where collisions have occurred.
Hot Spot Analysis
Following conventional collision mapping
processes, the top intersections
and corridors that account for a
disproportionate share of collisions
were identified. The location of fatal
and severe injury (KSI) collisions were
overlaid to see where the most severe
collisions occurred and if there was
overlap with the collision hotspots.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 29
Key Issues
The hotspot identification, collision typing,
and stakeholder feedback informed the
development of key issues that are divided
into violations, crash types, and locations.
The key issues are listed below by category
with an explanation of what makes each
violation, crash type, or location a key safety
issue.
Violations
›Unsafe Speeding is the top violation for
citywide collisions.
›Improper Turning is the top violation for
citywide KSI vehicle-only collisions.
›Many collisions where someone is Driving
Under the Influence result in a fatality or
severe injury.
›Pedestrian Crossing Outside Crosswalk
is a top violation for pedestrian collisions.
›Pedestrian in Road accounts for a high
share of citywide KSI pedestrian collisions.
›Wrong Side of Road (Bicycle) is a top
violation for bicycle collisions.
Crash Types
›Broadside collisions account for the
highest number of total collisions.
›Many collisions involving a Hit Object
result in a fatality or severe injury.
›Nighttime collisions account for a high
share of citywide KSI collisions, especially
involving someone walking or biking.
›Driver at Fault Proceeding Straight is the
top movement for the driver at fault in
citywide and KSI collisions.
›Victims Under 19 are a key demographic
identified through the stakeholder
meetings for collisions occurring around
schools.
Locations
›Nearly a third of total and KSI collisions
occur on 4 or 5 Lane Roads with 40+ MPH
Speed Limit.
›Many nighttime collisions occurred in an
area with No Streetlights.
›Curves were identified as a risk factor in
the stakeholder meetings.
›A third of total collisions and a quarter
of KSI collisions occurred at Signalized
Intersection.
›A third of total collisions and a quarter of
KSI collisions occur at Major Unsignalized
Intersections.
›Nearly half of KSI collisions occurred
midblock, or between intersections.
›Commercial Areas and Schools were
identified as priority locations in the
stakeholder meetings.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 530
Collisions
Option East/West Street North/South Street Intersection Type Total KSI Bike Ped
1 Ramona Boulevard Sanderson Avenue Signal 14 7 0 0
2 Ramona Expressway Sanderson Avenue Signal 33 4 1 0
3 7th Street State Street Signal 22 2 1 3
4 Midway Street San Jacinto Avenue Two-Way Stop Control 17 2 1 2
5 Ramona Expressway State Street Signal 17 2 1 0
6 Ramona Expressway Eagle Drive Signal 11 2 1 1
7 Lyon Avenue Cottonwood Avenue All-Way Stop Control 8 2 1 0
Collisions
Option Segment North/East Extent South/West Extent Total KSI Bike Ped
1 Sanderson Avenue Ramona Boulevard Cottonwood Avenue 32 7 0 1
2 San Jacinto Avenue Midway Street East Menlo Avenue 24 7 5 4
3 Sanderson Avenue Ramona Expressway Ramona Boulevard 14 6 0 0
4*Sanderson Avenue Gilman Springs Road Ramona Expressway 37 6 1 0
5 Ramona Expressway State Street Chase Street 17 5 4 1
6 Ramona Expressway Lake Park Drive San Jacinto Avenue 26 4 0 1
SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS
Hot Spot Analysis
To summarize the total number of collisions
by intersection, a set of non-overlapping areas
of influence were generated based on a 50-
foot radius around minor intersections and a
250-foot radius around major intersections.
Major intersections are defined here as all
intersections larger than where a two-lane road
meets a two-lane road.To summarize the total
number of collisions by roadway, collisions were
matched to roadways based on the primary
road name and a 50-foot search area. Not all
collisions are associated with an intersection,
but all collisions are associated with a roadway.
The map on the following page identifies
intersections and corridors with a concentration
of fatal and severe injury (KSI) collisions. The top
intersection and segment locations are listed on
corresponding tables.
Systemic Matrices
Collision data was paired with geographic
roadway and other contextual data to develop
collision types using a series of systemic
matrices. Outputs from the collision analysis
were used to populate a set of matrices that
allow us to look at crosstabs (collision data
in rows and geographic data in columns) for
collisions across the entire roadway network.
The matrices allowed for identification of the
combinations of factors that contributed to a
high number of all collisions, and combinations
that led to a high number of fatal and severe
collisions. Matrices were created for each mode,
as well as for the most severe collisions. From
these matrices, we identified a set of collision
types that represent the most frequent and
most severe collision types across a broad range
off roadway and land use contexts within San
Jacinto.
Table 02: KSI Hot Spot Locations, Intersections
Table 03: KSI Hot Spot Locations, Segments
The following matrices show the number of collisions for each cross-tab of factors. Factors related to collision data
are displayed in rows and roadway or other contextual factors are displayed in columns. By combining the collision and
roadway/conextual factors, we are able to start developing key collision types. Cells with a high number of collisions
within each column grouping are highlighted. Note that most collisions fall into multiple categories, so rows and
columns do not sum to 100% See appendix for matrices by mode.
*Under Caltrans jurisdiction
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 31
.Miles
(2015 - 2019)
KSI Collisions per Intersection
1 - 2
3-5
6-7
KSI Collisions per Mile
1 - 5
5 - 10
10 - 20
20 - 35
Idyllwild Dr
7th St
Washington Ave
1st StSanderson AveLyons AveState StSan Jacinto AveSanta Fe AveHewitt StMain St
De Anza Dr
N Warren RdRamona Blvd
Ramona Ex
p
y
Cottonwood Ave
W Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
7th St
Ra
mo
n
a
Ex
py
S
o
boba RdPark Ave
79
E Es
p
l
anade Ave
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 31
KSI HOT SPOT LOCATIONS2015-2019
Figure 13
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 532
Roadway Type Location Type
No Street LightNear SchoolNear ParkNear RetailNear TransitIn Disadvantaged CommunityIn Low-Income CommunityTOTALLanes 3 Lanes or Less 4 or 5 Lanes 6
Lanes
Signal
Unsignalized
Intersection Mid-
blockSpeed (mph)15-
25
30-
35
40-
45
50-
60
30-
35
40-
45
50-
60
50-
60 Major Minor
ViolationDriving Under Influence 10 7 20 6 0 18 19 1 30 22 7 22 53 18 36 45 24 28 41 81
Unsafe Speed 16 21 42 36 2 88 56 21 114 56 4 108 209 55 79 191 93 102 167 282
Improper Turning 22 13 26 18 0 33 18 7 33 37 4 63 94 32 59 74 44 48 71 137
Automobile Right of Way 24 15 54 8 0 54 14 2 39 81 16 36 64 55 82 125 68 59 116 172
Traffic Signs and Signals 6 11 31 9 0 41 26 12 86 38 2 10 90 35 53 98 58 38 87 136
TypeHead-On 8 5 16 5 0 19 15 0 27 16 2 23 46 19 24 43 25 23 42 68
Sideswipe 6 6 8 3 1 24 10 3 19 16 4 22 41 18 22 40 23 19 36 61
Rear End 13 23 47 37 2 91 58 23 124 57 2 111 222 60 87 198 97 106 168 294
Broadside 44 30 98 18 0 99 48 16 133 135 24 62 180 97 152 250 137 114 220 354
Hit Object 12 7 18 12 0 16 15 4 14 30 3 37 57 19 36 45 22 27 42 84
Time of Day12 am -3 am 2 2 5 1 0 2 11 4 7 5 0 15 22 4 6 11 6 11 9 27
3 am - 6 am 1 1 7 5 0 9 12 7 9 9 0 25 29 5 14 22 11 18 13 43
6 am - 9 am 17 13 23 17 2 18 14 8 32 38 10 32 68 24 53 64 34 31 58 112
9 am - 12 pm 8 8 26 17 0 37 20 6 50 30 2 40 83 31 48 78 41 46 78 122
12 pm - 3 pm 23 15 40 10 1 67 29 7 63 62 10 57 112 60 67 128 78 58 116 192
3 pm - 6 pm 30 17 50 18 0 79 29 10 79 63 10 81 146 66 90 167 84 71 145 233
6 pm - 9 pm 19 15 33 11 0 42 25 6 58 44 7 42 102 36 58 102 58 57 92 151
9 pm - 12 am 6 8 19 1 0 33 25 3 41 27 4 23 61 22 28 70 37 33 55 95
Driver at Fault Proceeding Straight 44 35 93 51 1 125 90 24 174 117 17 156 308 106 169 302 146 163 276 464
Making Right Turn 6 3 10 5 0 15 4 4 24 14 1 8 33 12 25 31 25 19 27 47
Making Left Turn 14 4 29 7 0 41 11 3 31 36 10 32 55 32 44 76 49 31 68 109
AgeUnder 19 31 18 40 7 0 39 28 5 56 55 17 40 93 49 80 110 62 57 100 168
60+5 7 27 11 0 45 30 11 54 38 2 42 95 22 46 92 50 42 85 136
DUIYes 14 13 21 5 0 34 20 5 42 30 8 32 73 31 47 70 39 33 62 112
TOTAL 106 79 203 80 3 287 165 51 339 278 43 315 623 248 364 642 349 325 566
Table 04: Systemic Matrix for All Collisions, 2015-2019
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 33San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 33
Roadway Type Location Type
No Street LightNear SchoolNear ParkNear RetailNear TransitIn Disadvantaged CommunityIn Low-Income CommunityTOTALLanes 3 Lanes or Less 4 or 5 Lanes 6
Lanes
Signal
Unsignalized
Intersection Mid-
blockSpeed (mph)15-
25
30-
35
40-
45
50-
60
30-
35
40-
45
50-
60
50-
60 Major Minor
ViolationDriving Under Influence 2 1 6 0 0 1 4 0 2 5 2 5 7 3 6 8 2 6 3 14
Unsafe Speed 1 0 0 0 0 3 5 3 7 2 0 3 9 2 2 7 2 4 6 12
Improper Turning 1 0 4 2 0 4 6 3 6 4 0 10 14 2 4 11 4 8 4 20
Automobile Right of Way 1 1 2 0 0 5 3 1 5 4 1 3 7 2 7 12 6 6 6 13
Traffic Signs and Signals 0 0 1 1 0 3 2 1 6 2 0 0 5 3 1 6 3 3 6 8
TypeHead-On 0 1 1 0 0 3 7 0 5 2 0 5 11 3 2 7 5 4 6 12
Sideswipe 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 3 0 3 2 5
Rear End 1 0 1 0 0 2 5 3 5 1 0 6 9 4 0 11 2 4 1 12
Broadside 3 2 6 1 0 8 4 3 10 10 3 4 13 5 13 20 11 11 15 27
Hit Object 0 0 5 2 0 4 6 2 5 4 0 10 13 3 4 9 1 8 3 19
Time of Day12 am -3 am 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 1 1 2 0 5 6 0 2 3 0 4 2 8
3 am - 6 am 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 3 2 1 0 8 9 2 1 7 4 3 3 11
6 am - 9 am 1 0 0 1 0 5 5 2 6 2 1 5 9 2 6 8 4 6 4 14
9 am - 12 pm 0 1 0 2 0 3 2 0 4 2 0 2 4 1 3 5 2 4 5 8
12 pm - 3 pm 1 0 2 0 0 1 3 1 4 1 1 2 7 0 2 4 2 3 3 8
3 pm - 6 pm 1 0 3 0 0 9 3 1 5 2 0 10 14 9 0 13 6 3 10 17
6 pm - 9 pm 4 3 5 0 0 4 4 1 5 6 2 8 15 4 11 17 6 10 11 21
9 pm - 12 am 1 2 6 0 0 7 6 1 6 6 0 11 13 5 5 17 9 6 9 23
Driver at Fault Proceeding Straight 5 0 6 2 0 8 15 2 16 7 2 13 24 11 9 20 7 16 15 38
Making Right Turn 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 3 1 0 1 4 0 2 5 2 2 1 5
Making Left Turn 1 0 4 1 0 2 2 2 4 2 1 5 8 1 5 8 5 4 5 12
AgeUnder 19 4 1 3 0 0 2 10 0 7 6 3 4 10 3 9 11 3 9 7 20
60+0 1 2 1 0 7 4 1 7 3 0 6 12 3 4 11 6 6 9 16
DUIYes 3 3 7 0 0 5 7 2 7 8 2 10 18 6 11 19 7 10 12 27
TOTAL 9 6 19 3 0 33 30 10 33 22 4 51 77 23 30 74 33 39 47
Table 05: Systemic Matrix for KSI Collisions, 2015-2019
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 534
0 10.5 Miles
Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions (2015 - 2019)
KSI Bicycle Collisions (7)
Other Injury Bicycle Collisions (59)
KSI Pedestrian Collisions (28)
Other Injury Pedestrian Collisions (32)
Idyllwild Dr
7th St
Washington Ave
1st StSanderson AveLyons AveState StSan Jacinto AveSanta Fe AveHewitt StMain St
De Anza Dr
N Warren RdRamona Blvd
Ramona Ex
p
y
Cottonwood Ave
W Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
7th St
Ra
mo
n
a
Ex
py
S
o
boba RdPark Ave
79
E Es
p
l
anade Ave
Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions 2015-2019
Figure 14
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 35
Meridian Street & Faulkner Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Countermeasure
Toolbox
Chapter 6
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 37
This toolbox presents safety
countermeasures covering
engineering, education, enforcement,
emergency services, and emerging
technology. Considerations for
equitable implementation of these
countermeasures are also noted
throughout the chapter.
The safety strategies in this chapter also
cover the five elements of a Safe System,
as shown in the figure below. California is
in the process of adopting the Safe System
approach and a focus on equity as part of its
Strategic Highway Safety Plan.
5 E's of Traffic Safety
The following toolbox presents
countermeasures that cover
the 5 E's of traffic safety:
Engineering, Education,
Enforcement, Emergency
Services, and Emerging
Technology.
WYOHERE ARE
ONTHE
SAFE SUYSTEMJOURNEY?
Implementing the Safe System approach is our shared responsibility,
and we all have a role. It requires shifting how we think about
transportation safety and how we prioritize our transportation
investments. Consider applying a Safe System lens to upcoming
projects and plans in your community: put safety at the forefront and
design to accommodate human mistakes and injury tolerances. Visit
safety.fhwa.dot.gov/zerodeaths to learn more.
Making a commitment to zero deaths means addressing every aspect of crash risks through the five
elements of a Safe System, shown below. These layers of protection and shared responsibility promote a holistic
approach to safety across the entire transportation system. The key focus of the Safe System approach is to
reduce death and serious injuries through design that accommodates human mistakes and injury tolerances.
The Safe System
approach addresses
the safety of all road
users, including
those who walk,
bike, drive, ride
transit, and travel by
other modes.
Vehicles are
designed and
regulated to
minimize the
occurrence and
severity of collisions
using safety
measures that
incorporate the
latest technology.
Humans are unlikely
to survive high-speed
crashes. Reducing
speeds can
accommodate human
injury tolerances in
three ways: reducing
impact forces,
providing additional
time for drivers to
stop, and improving
visibility.
Designing to
accommodate human
mistakes and injury
tolerances can greatly
reduce the severity of
crashes that do occur.
Examples include
physically separating
people traveling at
different speeds,
providing dedicated
times for different
users to move through
a space, and alerting
users to hazards and
other road users.
When a person is
injured in a collision,
they rely on
emergency first
responders to quickly
locate them, stabilize
their injury, and
transport them to
medical facilities.
Post-crash care also
includes forensic
analysis at the crash
site, traffic incident
management, and
other activities.
Safe Road
Users
Safe
Vehicles
Safe
Speeds
Safe
Roads
Post-Crash
Care
THE SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH VS. TRADITIONAL ROAD SAFETY PRACTICES
Traditional
Prevent crashes
Safe System
Prevent deaths and serious injuries
Improve human behavior Design for human mistakes/limitations
Control speeding Reduce system kinetic energy
Individuals are responsible Share responsibility
React based on crash history Proactively identify and address risks
Whereas traditional road safety
strives to modify human behavior
and prevent all crashes, the Safe
System approach also refocuses
transportation system design and
operation on anticipating human
mistakes and lessening impact
forces to reduce crash severity
and save lives.
SAFE SYSTEM ELEMENTS
Figure 15
Safe System Elements
Source: Fehr & Peers for FHWA
This plan's focus on the E's of traffic safety,
as well as the Safe System approach and
an emphasis on equity helps to provide
alignment with current LRSP guidelines,
but also sets the City of San Jacinto up for
success in recognition of emerging safety
best practices.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 638
GEOMETRIC MODIFICATIONS
Directional Median Opening
to Restrict Left Turns
Intersection Reconstruction
Lane Narrowing
Median Barrier
Raised Median/Access Control and Turn
Restrictions
Right Turn Slip Lane
Road Diet
Widen Shoulder
SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS
Advance Dilemma Zone Detection
Extend Yellow and All Red Time
Flashing Beacon as Advance Warning
Improve Signal Timing
Protected Left Turns
Retroreflective Borders on Signals
Shorten Cycle Length
Signal interconnectivity and Coordination
Supplemental Signal Heads
CONTROL
All-Way Stop Control
Install Roundabout
Install Signal
LIGHTING
Intersection Lighting
Segment Lighting
Summary of Countermeasures
Local Road Safety Manual (LRSM) Countermeasure
ENGINEERING
REMOVE/SHIELD OBJECTS
Guardrail
Impact Attenuators
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 39
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
Advance Stop Bar
Curb Extensions
Green Conflict Striping
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Leading Pedestrian Interval
and Pedestrian Recall
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
Raised Crosswalk
Raised Median/Refuge Island
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
Separated Bike Lanes
Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossings with
Enhanced Safety Features
OPERATION/WARNING
Centerline Hardening
Curve Advance Warning Sign
Chevron Signs on Horizontal Curves
Daylight Intersection
Delineators
Also: Reflectors, Object Markers
Dynamic Speed
Warning Signs (Curves)
Edgeline Rumble Strips/Stripes
Painted Centerline
and Raised Pavement Markers
Speed Feedback Sign
Speed Legends on Pavement
at Neighborhood Entries
Striping through Intersection
Red Light Camera
Update Markings on Speed Humps
Upgrade Intersection
Pavement Markings
Upgrade to Larger or
Install Additional Warning Signs
Summary of Countermeasures
Local Road Safety Manual (LRSM) Countermeasure
ENGINEERING ENGINEERING
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 640
What You'll See in This Toolbox
Countermeasure
Details
LRSM Countermeasure Code
LRSM CountermeasureCountermeasure Title
Countermeasure Icon
Countermeasure
Description
Crash Reduction Factor
Mode(s) this Countermeasure
Affects
Indicates Reductions in
Nighttime Crashes
Applicable to
LRSM Countermeasures
NIGHT
Key Issues in San
Jacinto Most Relevant
to Countermeasure
Local Roadway Safety
Manual
Many of these countermeasures
are recommended for the
10 emphasis areas included
in this report. Most of the
countermeasures are included
in the 2020 Caltrans Local
Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM)
and can be advantageous for
use in Caltrans Highway Safety
Improvement Program (HSIP)
grant funding applications. The
toolbox identifies a Caltrans-
approved Crash Reduction
Factor (CRF), the expected
life of the project, the federal
funding eligibility, the systemic
opportunity for countermeasure
implementation, and applicable
collision type (e.g., all modes,
bicycle and pedestrian collisions
only, etc.) as outlined in the
LRSM. The higher the CRF, the
greater the expected reduction
in collisions. There are many
effective safety countermeasures
beyond those listed in the LRSM,
and several are included in this
toolbox.
Intersection Lighting
Adding Intersection Lighting at the
intersection and on its approaches,
improves the safety of an intersection
during nighttime conditions by (1) making
drivers more aware of the surroundings at
an intersection, which improves drivers'
perception-reaction times, (2) enhancing
drivers' available sight distances, and
(3) improving the visibility of non-motorists.
Intersection lighting is of particular benefit
to non-motorized users as lighting not only
helps them navigate the intersection, but
also helps drivers see them better.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
CRF 40%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID S01/NS01
NIGHT
NIGHTTIME NO STREETLIGHTS
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Midway Street &
San Jacinto Avenue
Hot Spot Sample
Locations show
applcability of some
countermeasures
at select KSI Hot
Spots identified on
pg 30
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 41
LIGHTING
Intersection Lighting Segment Lighting
Adding Intersection Lighting at the
intersection and on its approaches,
improves the safety of an intersection
during nighttime conditions by (1) making
drivers more aware of the surroundings at
an intersection, which improves drivers'
perception-reaction times, (2) enhancing
drivers' available sight distances, and
(3) improving the visibility of non-motorists.
Intersection lighting is of particular benefit
to non-motorized users as lighting not only
helps them navigate the intersection, but
also helps drivers see them better.
Providing segment lighting improves safety
during nighttime conditions by making
drivers more aware of the surroundings,
which improves drivers' perception-reaction
times; enhancing drivers' available sight
distances to perceive roadway characteristic
in advance of the change; and improving
non-motorist's visibility and navigation.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
CRF 40%
CRASH
TYPE
CRF 35%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID S01/NS01 LRSM ID R01
NIGHT NIGHT
Figure 16
Guidance for
Lighting on Curves
Source: FHWA
Figure 17
Guidance for Lighting
at Midblock Crosswalks
Source: FHWA
NIGHTTIME NO STREETLIGHTS NIGHTTIME NO STREETLIGHTS
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Midway Street &
San Jacinto Avenue
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway b/t
Lake Park Drive &
San Jacinto Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 642
CONTROL
All-Way Stop Control
An all-way stop-controlled intersection
requires all vehicles to stop before crossing
the intersection. An all-way stop-controlled
intersection improves safety by removing
the need for motorists, bicyclists, and
pedestrians on a side-street stop-controlled
intersection to cross free-flowing lanes of
traffic, which reduces the risk of collision.
An "All-Way Stop" sign should be placed
under stop signs at all-way stop-controlled
intersections as required by the California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD).
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity High
LRSM ID NS02
CRF 50%
CRASH
TYPE LEFT-TURN ANGLE
BROADSIDE
Install Signal Install Roundabout
Traffic signals at intersections control
the flow of traffic. Traffic signals have the
potential to reduce the most severe type
crashes but will likely cause an increase in
rear-end collisions. A reduction in overall
injury severity is likely the largest benefit of
traffic signal installation.
A roundabout is a type of circular intersection
in which road traffic is permitted to flow in
one direction around a central island, and
priority is typically given to traffic already
in the junction. The types of conflicts that
occur at roundabouts are different from
those occurring at conventional intersections;
namely, conflicts from crossing and left-turn
movements are not present in a roundabout.
The geometry of a roundabout keeps the
range of vehicle speed narrow, which helps
reduce the severity of crashes when they do
occur. Pedestrians only have to cross one
direction of traffic at a time at roundabouts,
thus reducing their potential for conflicts. See
CA MUTCD Chapter 3C for details.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Low
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Low
LRSM ID NS03 LRSM ID S16/NS04/NS05
CRF 30%
CRASH
TYPE
CRF VARIES
CRASH
TYPE
MAJOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
BROADSIDE
MAJOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
BROADSIDE
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Lyon Avenue &
Cottonwood Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 43
REMOVE/ SHIELD
OBSTACLES
Impact Attenuators Guardrail
Impact attenuators bring an errant vehicle
to a more-controlled stop or redirect the
vehicle away from a rigid object. Impact
attenuators are typically used to shield rigid
roadside objects such as concrete barrier
ends, steel guardrail ends and bridge pillars
from oncoming automobiles. Attenuators
should only be installed where it is
impractical for the objects to be removed.
Guardrail redirects a vehicle away from
embankment slopes or fixed objects and
dissipates the energy of an errant vehicle.
Guardrail is installed to reduce the severity
of lane departure crashes. However,
guardrail can reduce crash severity only
for those conditions where striking the
guardrail is less severe than going down an
embankment or striking a fixed object.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity High
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity High
CRF 25%
CRASH
TYPE
CRF 25%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID R05LRSM ID R04
FIXED
OBJECT
FIXED
OBJECT
RUN-OFF
ROAD
RUN-OFF
ROAD
HIT OBJECT HIT OBJECT
Figure 18
Examples Markings for
One-Lane Roundabouts
Source: CA MUTCD
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway b/t
Lake Park Drive &
San Jacinto Avenue
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Sanderson Avenue b/t
Ramona Boulevard
& Cottonwood Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 644
Lane Narrowing
Lane narrowing reduces lane widths to
encourage motorists to travel at slower
speeds. Lane Narrowing improves safety
by lowering the risk of collision among
bicyclists, pedestrians, and other motorists.
GEOMETRIC
MODIFICATIONS
UNSAFE SPEED
Directional Median Opening to Restrict Left Turns
A directional median opening restricts
specific turning movements, such as
allowing a left-turn from a major street
but not from a minor street. A directional
median opening to restrict left turns
improves safety by reducing the number of
conflict points.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 90%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
LRSM ID S14/NS15
CRF 50%
CRASH
TYPE
IMPROPER TURNING BROADSIDE
MAJOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Intersection Reconstruction
Irregular intersections can be overbuilt and
confusing, presenting safety hazards to all
users. "Squaring up" an intersection as
close to 90 degrees as possible involves
major intersection reconstruction to provide
better visibility for all road users, reducing
high speed turns and reducing pedestrian
crossing length.
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
San Jacinto Avenue
b/t Midway Street
& Menlo Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 45
Median Barrier
This strategy is designed to prevent head-
on collisions by providing a barrier between
opposing lanes of traffic. The variety of
median barriers available makes it easier
to choose a site-specific solution. The main
advantage is the reduction of the severity
of the crashes. Median Barriers can also be
used at locations to discourage pedestrian
crossings where a safe crossing cannot be
provided.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%/90%
Systemic Opportunity Medium/Low
CRF 25%/35%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID R03/S13PB
HEAD-ON
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OUTSIDE CROSSWALK
Right Turn Slip Lane
A right turn slip lane is a traffic lane
provided at an intersection to allow vehicles
to turn right without actually entering it and
interfering with through traffic. Where the
main intersection is controlled by traffic
signals, a slip lane is often controlled by yield
or stop sign. Slip lanes should be designed
with safe speeds and pedestrian safety in
mind, providing high-visibility crosswalks
and enhanced pedestrian crossing signage,
ensuring pedestrian visibility to drivers
through crosswalk placement, and reducing
turning radii to support safe turning speeds.
Raised Median/Access Control and Turn Restrictions
Access control and turn restrictions
balances traffic safety and efficiency with
reasonable property access. Installing
a raised median can restrict turning
movements and reduce head-on collisions
by number of vehicles that cross the
centerline.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 90%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
LRSM ID R08
CRF 25%
CRASH
TYPE
IMPROPER TURNING BROADSIDE
MAJOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
GEOMETRIC
MODIFICATIONS
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway
& State Street
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
San Jacinto Avenue
b/t Midway Street
& Menlo Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 646
GEOMETRIC
MODIFICATIONS
Widen Shoulder
Widened and paved shoulders, which may
also include flattening the slopes along the
sides of the roadway, create a separated
space for bicyclists and also provide motor
vehicle safety benefits, such as space for
inoperable vehicles to pull out of the travel
lane.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 90%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
CRF 30%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID R15
FIXED
OBJECT
RUN-OFF
ROAD
SIDE-
SWIPE
PEDESTRIAN IN ROAD
Road Diet
A road diet reduces roadway space
dedicated to vehicle travel lanes to create
room for bicycle facilities, wider sidewalks,
or center turn lanes. A Road Diet improves
safety by reducing vehicle speeds and
creating designated space for all road users.
FHWA advises that streets with 20,000
ADT or less may be good candidates for
road diets, though road diets have been
implemented successfully on roadways with
higher traffic volumes in urban settings.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 90%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
CRF 30%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID R14
UNSAFE SPEED
ES2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
local economies, such as property values or business
revenues. In other words, while there are myriad
voices linking road diets to both positive and negative
economic outcomes, there is very little concrete
evidence to support either claim. York Boulevard: The
Economics of a Road Diet explores this relationship
through case research in the Highland Park
neighborhood of northeast Los Angeles, California.
The backbone of a low- to moderate-density,
mixed residential and commercial neighborhood,
York Boulevard is an ideal corridor for studying the
economic effects of road diets because it creates
a natural experiment. Land uses, socioeconomic
characteristics, and the quantity and types of
businesses remain fairly comparable over the entire
the study corridor, but half of the corridor has a road
diet and bicycle lanes and the other half does not.
As Figure ES2 illustrates, the western portion of the
corridor—between Eagle Rock Boulevard and Avenue
55—received a road diet in 2006 and bike lanes in
2010. The eastern half of the York Boulevard corridor,
from Avenue 55 to Figueroa Street, retains its original,
Pre-Road Diet
Two auto lanes in each direction, shared with bicycles
Post-Road DietOne auto lane and one bike lane in each direction, plus a center turn laneFigureTypical road diet conversionES1Figure 19
Typical Road Diet
Configuration
Source: Fehr & Peers
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
San Jacinto Avenue
b/t Midway Street
& Menlo Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 47San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 47
Advance Dilemma-Zone Detection Extend Yellow and All Red Time Flashing Beacon as Advance Warning
An advanced dilemma-zone detection
system minimizes the number of vehicles
the intersection traffic control signal system
exposes to an intersection-approach
dilemma zone. This is accomplished by
adjusting the start time of the yellow-
signal phase either earlier or later, based on
observed vehicle locations and speeds.
Extending yellow and all red time increases
the time allotted for the yellow and red
lights during a signal phase. Extending
yellow and red time improves safety by
allowing drivers and bicyclists to safely cross
through a signalized intersection before
conflicting traffic movements are permitted
to enter the intersection. See CA MUTCD
Section 4D.26 for more detail.
A flashing beacon as advance warning
is a blinking light with signage to notify
motorists of an upcoming intersection or
crosswalk. A Flashing Beacon improves
safety by providing motorists more time
to be aware of and slow down for an
intersection or yield to pedestrians crossing
a crosswalk.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity High
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 50%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
SIGNAL
MODIFICATIONS
CRF 40%
CRASH
TYPE
CRF 15%
CRASH
TYPE
CRF 30%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID S04 LRSM ID S03 LRSM ID S10
REAR-END ANGLE
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION BROADSIDE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION BROADSIDE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway
& State Street
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway
& State Street
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 648
Improve Signal Timing Protected Left Turns
Certain timing, phasing, and control
strategies can produce multiple safety
benefits. Signalization improvements
may include adding phases, lengthening
clearance intervals, eliminating or restricting
higher-risk movements, and coordinating
signals at multiple locations.
A protected left turn can be implemented
at signalized intersections s (with existing
left turns pockets) that currently have
a permissive left-turn or no left-turn
protection that have a high frequency
of angle crashes involving left turning,
opposing through vehicles, and non-
motorized road users. Left turns are widely
recognized as the highest-risk movements at
signalized intersections. Providing protected
left-turn phases for signalized intersections
significantly improve the safety for left-
turn maneuvers by removing the need for
the drivers to navigate through gaps in
oncoming/opposing through vehicles.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 50%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity High
CRF 15%
CRASH
TYPE
CRF 30%
CRASH
TYPE
SIGNAL
MODIFICATIONS
LRSM ID S03 LRSM ID S07
Retroreflective Borders on Signals
Retroreflective borders enhance the
visibility of traffic signals for aging and
color vision impaired drivers enabling them
to understand which signal indication is
illuminated. Retroreflective borders may
also alert drivers to signalized intersections
during periods of power outages when the
signals would otherwise be dark, and non–
reflective signal heads and backplates would
not be visible.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
CRF 15%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID S02
REAR-END ANGLE
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION BROADSIDE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION BROADSIDE
NIGHTTIME
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway
& State Street
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
7th Street &
State Street
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 49San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 49
Shorten Cycle Length
Traffic signal cycle lengths have a significant
impact on the quality of the urban realm
and consequently, the opportunities for
bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit vehicles
to operate safely along a corridor. Long
signal cycles, compounded over multiple
intersections, can make crossing a street
or walking even a short distance prohibitive
and frustrating. Short cycle lengths of
60–90 seconds are ideal for urban areas.
SIGNAL
MODIFICATIONS
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
Signal Interconnectivity and Coordination
Certain timing, phasing, and control
strategies can produce multiple safety
benefits. Sometimes capacity improvements
come along with the safety improvements
and other times adverse effects on delay or
capacity occur. The emphasis of improving
signal coordination for this countermeasure
is to provide an opportunity for slow speed
signal coordination.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 50%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
CRF 15%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID S03
REAR-END ANGLE
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION UNSAFE SPEED
Supplemental Signal Heads
Additional signal heads allow drivers to
anticipate signal changes farther away
from intersections. Supplemental traffic
signals may be placed on the near side of an
intersection, far-left, far-right, or very high.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
CRF 15%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID S02
REAR-END ANGLE
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway
& Eagle Drive
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway
& Sanderson Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 650
OPERATION / WARNING
Chevron Signs on Horizontal Curves
Post-mounted chevrons are intended to
warn drivers of an approaching curve and
provide tracking information and guidance
to the drivers. They can be beneficial on
roadways that have an unacceptable level
of crashes on relatively sharp curves during
periods of light and darkness.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
CRF 40%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID R23
RUN-OFF ROAD
CURVES
Curve Advance Warning Sign
A curve advance warning sign notifies
drivers of an approaching curve and may
include an advisory speed limit as drivers
navigate around the curve. This warning sign
is ideally combined with other infrastructure
that alerts drivers of the curve, such as
chevron signs, delineators, and flashing
beacons. A curve advance warning sign
improves safety by giving drivers additional
time to slow down for the curve.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
CRF 25%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID R24
RUN-OFF ROAD
CURVES
Centerline Hardening
Centerline hardening is a technique to make
intersections safer by encouraging drivers
to make left turns at slower speeds and
encourage safe turning behavior. Bollards
and rubber curbs are used to block the
diagonal path through the intersection,
modifying the turning angle of the vehicle,
and increasing visibility of pedestrians in the
crosswalk for drivers.
IMPROPER TURNING
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway b/t
Lake Park Drive &
San Jacinto Avenue
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway b/t
Lake Park Drive &
San Jacinto Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 51
OPERATION / WARNING
Delineators
Also: Reflectors, Object Markers
Delineators, reflectors and object
markers are intended to warn drivers
of an approaching curve or fixed object
that cannot easily be removed. They are
generally less costly than Chevron Signs as
they don't require posts to place along the
roadside, avoiding an additional object with
which an errant vehicle can crash into. See
CA MUTCD Section 3F for more details.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
LRSM ID R27
CRF 15%
CRASH
TYPE
HIT OBJECT CURVES
NIGHTTIME
Dynamic Speed Warning Signs (Curves)
A dynamic speed warning sign notifies
drivers of their current speed, usually
followed by a reminder of the posted
speed limit. A Speed Feedback Sign
improves safety by providing a cue for
drivers to check their speed and slow
down, if necessary. This countermeasure
is applicable on curvilinear roadways that
have an unacceptable level of crashes due to
excessive speeds on relatively sharp curves.
This countermeasure does not apply to
Radar Speed Feedback Signs, which do not
have a nationally accepted crash
reduction factor.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity High
CRF 30%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID R26
CURVES
Daylight Intersection
To “daylight” an intersection is to clear
sight lines between pedestrian crossings
and oncoming cars, usually by creating
no-parking zones at the curbs in front of
crosswalks at that intersection. By removing
sight distance restrictions (e.g., vegetation,
parked vehicles, signs, buildings) from the
sight triangles at stop or yield-controlled
intersection approaches, drivers will be
able see approaching vehicles on the main
line, without obstruction and therefore
make better decisions about entering the
intersection safely
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 90%
Systemic Opportunity High
LRSM ID NS11
CRF 20%
CRASH
TYPE
BROADSIDE VICTIMS UNDER 19
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway b/t
Lake Park Drive &
San Jacinto Avenue
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Sanderson Avenue b/t
Ramona Boulevard &
Cottonwood Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 652
OPERATION / WARNING
Speed Feedback Sign
A speed feedback sign notifies drivers of
their current speed, usually followed by a
reminder of the posted speed limit. A Speed
Feedback Sign improves safety by providing
a cue for drivers to check their speed and
slow down, if necessary.
UNSAFE SPEED
Painted Centerline and Raised Pavement Markers
A raised pavement marker is a small
device attached to the road and used as a
positioning guide for drivers. These markers,
along with painted centerlines can assist
drivers in understanding the limits of travel
lanes and he roadway. New pavement
marking products tend to be more durable,
are allweather, more visible, and have a
higher retroreflectivity than traditional
pavement markings. See CA MUTCD
Section 3B.01 and 3B.11-14 for additional
detail.
NIGHTTIME
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
LRSM ID R28
CRF 25%
CRASH
TYPE RUN-OFF ROAD HEAD-ON
Edgeline Rumble Strips
Rumble strips can be installed along the
edge line or center line to address roadway
departure and head-on crashes caused by
distracted, drowsy, or otherwise inattentive
drivers who drift from their lane. See CA
MUTCD Section 3J for more details.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity High
LRSM ID R31
CRF 15%
CRASH
TYPE RUN-OFF ROAD
HIT OBJECT NIGHTTIME
UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Sanderson Avenue b/t
Ramona Boulevard &
Cottonwood Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 53
Striping through Intersection
Adding clear striping through the
intersection can guide motorists through
complex intersections. Intersections
where the lane designations are not clearly
visible to approaching motorists and/
or intersections noted as being complex
and experiencing crashes that could be
attributed to a driver’s unsuccessful attempt
to navigate the intersection can benefit from
this treatment.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
CRF 10%
CRASH
TYPE
OPERATION / WARNING
LRSM ID S09
NIGHT WET
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
Speed Legends on Pavementat Neighborhood Entries
Speed legends are numerals painted on the
roadway indicating the current speed limit in
miles per hour. They are usually placed near
speed limit signposts.
Red Light Camera
A red light camera enforces traffic signal
compliance by capturing the image of a
vehicle that has entered an intersection in
spite of the traffic signal indicating red. The
automatic photographic evidence is used by
authorities to enforce traffic laws and issue
traffic violation tickets.
UNSAFE SPEED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION BROADSIDE
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway
& Sanderson Avenue
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Ramona Expressway
& Sanderson Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 654
OPERATION / WARNING
Update Markings on Speed Humps
Speed humps are the common name for
traffic calming devices that use vertical
deflection to slow motor-vehicle traffic
in order to improve safety conditions.
Refreshed markings on speed humps can
help to bring drivers' awareness to their
location. See Section 3B.25 of the CA
MUTCD for more information.
Figure 20
Pavement Markings for
Speed Humps without
Crosswalks
Source: CA MUTCD
Upgrade Intersection Pavement Markings
Upgrading intersection pavement markings
can include "Stop Ahead" markings and
the addition of centerlines and stop bars.
Upgrading intersection pavement markings
improve safety by increasing the visibility of
intersections for drivers approaching and at
the intersection.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
CRF 25%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID NS07
BROADSIDE
MAJOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Upgrade to Larger or Install Additional Warning Signs
Upgrading to larger warning signs replaces
existing signs with physically larger signs
with larger warning information. Installing
additional warning signs can help bring
awareness to an intersection. These
enhancements improve safety by increasing
visibility of the information provided.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
CRF 15%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID NS06
BROADSIDE
MAJOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
UNSAFE SPEED
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Midway Street &
San Jacinto Avenue
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
Midway Street &
San Jacinto Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 55
PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE
Advance Stop Bar
An advance stop bar is a horizontal
stripe painted ahead of the crosswalk at
stop signs and signals to indicate where
drivers should stop. An advanced stop bar
improves safety by reducing instances of
vehicles encroaching on the crosswalk.
Creating a wider stop bar or setting the
stop bar further back may be appropriate
for locations with known crosswalk
encroachment issues. See CA MUTCD
Section 3B.16 for more information.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Very High
CRF 15%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID S20PB
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
Green Conflict Striping
Green conflict striping is green markings
painted in a dashed pattern on bike lanes
approaching an intersection and/or going
through an intersection. Green conflict
striping improves safety by increasing the
visibility bicyclists and identifying potential
conflict points so bicyclists and motorists
use caution when traveling toward and
through an intersection.
BROADSIDE
Curb Extensions
A curb extension is a traffic calming
measure which widens the sidewalk for a
short distance to enhance the pedestrian
crossing. This reduces the crossing distance
and allowing pedestrians and drivers to
see each other when parked vehicles would
otherwise block visibility.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
CRF 35%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID S20PB
PEDESTRIANS CROSSING OUTSIDE CROSSWALK
UNSAFE SPEED SCHOOLS VICTIMS UNDER 19
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
7th Street &
State Street
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 656
PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE
Install Sidewalk
Installing Sidewalks provides a separated
and continuous facility for people to walk
along the roadway. Adding sidewalks
improves safety by minimizing collisions
with pedestrians walking in the road.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 90%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
CRF 80%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID R34PB
Leading Pedestrian Interval andPedestrian Recall
At intersection locations that have a high
volume of turning vehicle and have high
pedestrian vs. vehicle crashes, a leading
pedestrian interval gives pedestrians the
opportunity to enter an intersection 3 - 7
seconds before vehicles are given a green
indication. With this head start, pedestrians
can better establish their presence in the
crosswalk before vehicles have priority
to turn left or right. Pedestrian recall
timing automatically provides a pedestrian
crossing phase, without having to press the
pedestrian call button.
Expected Life (Years)10
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity High
LRSM ID S21PB
CRF 60%
CRASH
TYPE
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
High-Visibility Crosswalk
A high-visibility crosswalk has a striped
pattern with markings made of high-
visibility material, such as thermoplastic
tape, instead of paint. A high-visibility
crosswalk improves safety with a clearly
marked pedestrian crossing so motorists
exercise caution and yield to pedestrians.
The crash reduction factor noted here
only applies to locations currently without
a marked crosswalk, but High-Visibility
Crosswalk upgrades can be implemented
globally at existing marked crosswalks. See
further information on crosswalks later in
this document, and Section 3B.18 of the CA
MUTCD for more detail.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity High
CRF 25%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID S18PB
PEDESTRIANS CROSSING OUTSIDE CROSSWALK PEDESTRIAN IN ROAD
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
7th Street &
State Street
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
San Jacinto Avenue
b/t Midway Street
& Menlo Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 57
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
Pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB), also
known as a HAWK, is a flashing light that is
activated by a pedestrian pushing a button
or some other form of detection. A PHB
is used at unsignalized intersections or
mid-block crosswalks to notify oncoming
motorists to stop with a series of red and
yellow lights. Unlike a traffic signal, the PHB
rests in dark until a pedestrian activates it
via pushbutton or other form of detection.
See CA MUTCD Section 4F for more detail.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Low
CRF 55%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID NS23PB
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OUTSIDE CROSSWALK
MIDBLOCK MAJOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
Raised Crosswalk
Raised crosswalks are ramped speed tables
spanning the entire width of the roadway,
often placed at midblock crossing locations.
The crosswalk is demarcated with paint
and/or special paving materials. These
crosswalks act as traffic-calming measures
that allow the pedestrian to cross at grade
with the sidewalk. A Raised Crosswalk
improves safety by increasing crosswalk
and pedestrian visibility and slowing down
motorists.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 90%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
CRF 35%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID R36PB
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OUTSIDE CROSSWALK
SCHOOLS VICTIMS UNDER 19
Raised Median/Refuge Island
A raised median/refuge island, is raised
curb in the center of the roadway that can
restrict certain turning movements and
provide a place for pedestrians to wait
if they are unable to finish crossing the
intersection. A Raised Median improves
safety by reducing the number of potential
conflict points with designated zones for
vehicles to turn, and a pedestrian refuge
island improves safety by reducing the
exposure time for pedestrians crossing the
intersection.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 90%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
CRF 45%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID NS19PB
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OUTSIDE CROSSWALK
4-5 LANE ROADS WITH 40+ MPH SPEEDS
PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
San Jacinto Avenue
b/t Midway Street
& Menlo Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 658
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
A rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB)
is a pedestrian-activated flashing light with
additional signage to alert motorists of a
pedestrian crossing. An RRFB improves
safety by increasing the visibility of marked
crosswalks and provides motorists a cue to
slow down and yield to pedestrians.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 100%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
CRF 35%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID NS22PB
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OUTSIDE CROSSWALK
SCHOOLS
Separated Bike Lanes
A separated bike lane provides dedicated
street space, typically adjacent to outer
vehicle travel lanes, with separation from
vehicle traffic, designated lane markings,
pavement legends, and signage. Bike
lanes improve safety by reducing conflicts
between bicycles and vehicles on the road
and by creating a road-narrowing effect
with buffers or vertical barriers, which may
reduce vehicle speeds.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 90%
Systemic Opportunity High
LRSM ID R33PB
CRF 45%
CRASH
TYPE
Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossings with Enhanced Safety Features
An uncontrolled pedestrian crossing at
an intersection or on a segment provides a
formalized location for people to cross the
street, reducing the risk of people crossing
outside crosswalks where drivers are not
expecting them. Crosswalk striping, signs,
and other enhanced safety features alert
drivers that there may be a pedestrian
crossing. See further information on
crosswalks later in this document for more
detail.
Expected Life (Years)20
Federal Funding Eligibility 90%
Systemic Opportunity Medium
CRF 35%
CRASH
TYPE
LRSM ID R35PB
PEDESTRIANS CROSSING OUTSIDE CROSSWALK
SCHOOLS COMMERCIAL AREAS
PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE
WRONG SIDE OF ROAD (BICYCLE)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 59
Raised Crosswalk
Curb Extension
COMMERCIAL AREAS
Widen Sidewalk
Widening sidewalks provides a more
comfortable space for pedestrians,
particularly in locations with high volumes
of pedestrians, and provides space to
accommodate people in wheelchairs.
Widening sidewalks improves safety by
minimizing collisions with pedestrians
walking in the road.
PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE
PEDESTRIAN IN ROAD
Hot Spot
Sample
Location
San Jacinto Avenue
b/t Midway Street
& Menlo Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 660
ENGINEERING
CROSSWALK POLICY BEST PRACTICES
Uncontrolled pedestrian crossings occur
where sidewalks or designated walkways
intersect a roadway at a location where no
traffic control (e.g., traffic signal or stop
sign) exists. This crossing type occurs
at intersections (marked or unmarked)
and at mid-block locations (where
they must be marked). Research has
demonstrated the importance of marking
uncontrolled crossings to facilitate access
to key destinations while ensuring that
additional safety treatments are applied
at these locations if they have higher
traffic speeds and volumes. The FHWA
Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at
Uncontrolled Crossing Locations proposes
Figure 21
Application of
Pedestrian Crash
Countermeasures by
Roadway Features
Source: FHWA
countermeasures based on road conditions,
crash causes, and pedestrian safety issues.
Figure 21 summarizes recommendations
from the guide, includes a comprehensive
matrix and list of FHWA-approved
pedestrian crash countermeasures
suggested for application at uncontrolled
crossing locations per roadway and
traffic features.
POSTED SPEED LIMIT AND AADT
Vehicle AADT <9,000 Vehicle AADT 9,000-15,000 Vehicle AADT >15,000
Roadway Configuration ≤30 mph 35mph ≥40mph ≤30 mph 35mph ≥40mph ≤30 mph 35mph ≥40mph
2 lanes
1 lane in each direction
1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 5 6 5 6 5 6 4 5 6 5 6 5 6 4 5 6 5 6 5 6
7 9 7 9 7 9 7 9 7 9 7 9 9
3 lanes
WITH RAISED MEDIAN
1 lane in each direction
1 2 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3
4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
7 9 7 9 7 9 7 9 7 9 7 9 7 9 9
3 lanes
WITHOUT RAISED MEDIAN
1 lane in each direction with a
two-way left-turn lane
1 2 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3
4 5 6 5 6 5 6 4 5 6 4 5 6 5 6 4 5 6 5 6 5 6
7 9 7 9 9 7 9 7 9 9 7 9 9 9
4+ lanes
WITH RAISED MEDIAN
2 or more lanes in each
direction
1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
7 8 9 7 8 9 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9 8 9 7 8 9 8 9 8 9
4+ lanes
WITHOUT RAISED MEDIAN
2 or more lanes in each
direction
1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3
5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6
7 8 9 7 8 9 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9 8 9 7 8 9 8 9 8 9
Signifies that crosswalk visibility enhancements should always
occur in conjunction with other identified countermeasures
Signifies that the countermeasure is a candidate treatment at a
marked uncontrolled crossing location
Signifies that the countermeasure should always be considered,
but not mandated or required, based upon engineering judgment
at a marked uncontrolled crossing locationThe absence of a number (#) signifies that the countermeasure
is generally not an appropriate treatment, but exceptions may be
considered following engineering judgment.
#
*It should be noted that
the PHB and RRFB are not
both installed at the same
crossing location
High-visibility
crosswalk markings,
parking restrictions on
crosswalk approach,
adequate nighttime
lighting levels, and
crossing warning signs
Raised crosswalk
Advance “Yield Here
To (Stop Here For)
Pedestrians” sign and
yield (stop) line
In-street pedestrian
crossing sign
Curb extension
Pedestrian refuge
island
Rectangular rapid-
flashing beacon
(RRFB)*
Road diet
Pedestrian hybrid
beacon (PHB)*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
KEY
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 61
DEMAND CONSIDERATIONS FOR
CROSSWALKS
Uncontrolled and mid-block crossings
should be identified as a candidate for
marking if there is a demonstrated need for
a crosswalk. Figure 22 provides a protocol
for deciding if a crosswalk is appropriate.
Engineering judgment should ultimately
be used to select locations appropriate
for a marked, uncontrolled crossing.
Enhanced treatments beyond basic striping
and signing should be considered for
uncontrolled locations, as shown on the
facing page.
OR
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
FEASIBLE
OR
25
20 pedestrians per
hour cross (in any two
hours, not necessarily
consecutive)
Location connects two
pedestrian generators
such as a school, park,
bus stop, hospital,
neighborhood serving
commercial center, or
multi-family residential
Insucient need to
justify marked
crossing
Nearest appropriately
marked or protected
crosswalk is at least
300 ft or more away
Low speed (posted or
prima facie 25 MPH),
2-lane roadway
Direct pedestrians to
the nearest marked or
protected crossing
Pedestrians can be
easily seen from a
feasible stopping
sight distance
It is feasible to
remove sight
obstruction or lower
the speed limit
Consider installing a
stop sign, signal, or
grade separation
Use Crossing
Guidance to
determine treatment
options
Should a crosswalk be installed?
Figure 22
Samples of Decision Tree
for Marking Crosswalks
Source: Fehr & Peers
ENGINEERING
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 662
CROSSWALK MARKINGS
Crosswalk markings help driver know where
to expect pedestrians, and provide guidance
for pedestrians crossing the roadway
by defining and delineating paths on
approaches to uncontrolled and mid-block
locations. The use of high visibility striping
is appropriate at both uncontrolled crossing
locations, and signalized locations as traffic
volumes, speeds, and vehicle-pedestrian
conflicts require. There are several
treatments for high visibility markings,
including the continental and triple-four
(also called double continental) markings,
shown in Figure 23. San Jacinto should
choose a preferred style to use, so it is
consistently applied. San Jacinto may also
want to adopt a policy of using high visibility
Figure 23
Crosswalk Marking
Examples
• Triple-four markings
include two dashed lines
on the outside with a clear
space in the center to
direct pedestrian traffic,
and are often enhanced
with outer rows of raised
pavement markers. They
may be less costly to install
and maintain as they
require less paint than a
standard high visibility
crosswalk.
Triple-FourContinentalStandard
markings at all marked crosswalks, when
intersection upgrades occur.
Continental striping is often chosen to
communicate sensitive pedestrian crossing
areas as the designated high
visibility tool. Research shows that
continental crosswalk markings are more
visible to drivers at night than parallel line
markings (1). Crosswalks with longitudinal
lines parallel to traffic flow allow drivers to
see the marked crosswalk from a greater
distance, when compared with standard
markings. This increased visibility distance
gives drivers more time to safely stop for a
pedestrian waiting to cross.
Additional resources:
(1) Fitzpatrick, K., S. Chrysler, V. Iragavarapu, and E.S.
Park. Detection Distances to Crosswalk Markings:
Transverse Lines, Continental Markings, and Bar Pairs.
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the
Transportation Research Board, No. 2250.
Transportation Research Board of the National
Academies, Washington, DC, 2011.
ENGINEERING
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 63San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 63
EDUCATION
Traffic safety education plays an important
role in shaping and shifting behavior.
Many cities, such as Seattle, Oakland, and
Los Angeles, are including community
engagement and education to make streets
safer for all. Education on traffic safety
requires a collaborative process among
many stakeholders to achieve the goal of
increased safety. Targeted education can
be directed at vulnerable populations, with
the help of local partners, and at certain
behaviors of drivers, pedestrian, and
bicyclists to deter specific collision types.
Such programs can be structured
classes, such as road school for cyclists
or outreach campaigns such as signs that
discourage distracted driving. There are
existing regional and statewide programs
that San Jacinto can deploy locally, such
as the Southern California Association
of Governments (SCAG) and Caltrans
campaigns listed below.
›SCAG Go Human is an outreach and
advertising campaign that aims to reduce
crashes and promote walking and biking.
Individual cities can participate in this
effort by working with SCAG to deploy
co-branded signs, banners and postcards
within their jurisdiction. SCAG also makes
available a media kit and radio ads for
local use. As discussed in Chapter 5, San
Jacinto developed the Envision San Jacinto
event in September 2018 in partnership
with the Go Human campaign.
›The California Office of Traffic Safety has
developed educational materials for local
use as part of their Go Safely California
campaign.
Public Education Media Campaign
A public education media campaign focused
on discouraging drinking and driving and/
or speeding, along with encouraging
increased awareness of pedestrians
and bicyclists at night and appropriate
crosswalk behaviors can help promote
behavior change. Messages about safe
and responsible driving, moving over for
EMS vehicles, awareness of bicyclists and
pedestrians, and increasing visibility at night
can help promote behaviors that prevent
fatal and severe collisions. As an example,
collaborating with local radio stations can
help spread the message to drivers.
San Jacinto can develop targeted outreach
education campaigns that focus on the
common violations that lead to fatalities
and severe injuries in San Jacinto. Based
on common crash types over the past five
years in San Jacinto, education and outreach
campaigns may include the programs listed
here.
For drivers this may include:
›Education campaign around driving under
the influence, as 27 percent of KSI crashes
involve drugs or alcohol.
›Education campaign that emphasizes
that speeding is deadly because unsafe
speeding caused 29 percent of crashes
and 11 percent of KSI crashes.
›Education campaign reinforcing which
road user has the right-of-way in different
scenarios because vehicle right-of-way
violation caused 18 percent and improper
turning caused 14 percent of total
crashes.
›Education campaign encouraging drivers
to be aware of pedestrians in the road
because during the analysis period, 35
percent of pedestrian crashes involved
someone in the road, including on the
shoulder.
For people biking:
›Classes that teach bicyclists how to use
on-street bike facilities, especially for
those facility types that are new
to the City.
For people walking:
›Education campaign encouraging crossing
in crosswalks because during the analysis
period, 22 pedestrian crashes occurred
when a pedestrian was crossing not in a
crosswalk. However, other approaches
are also needed to mitigate pedestrian
crashes because as many pedestrian
crashes occurred when a pedestrian was
crossing in a crosswalk.
Partner with Local Schools on
Traffic Safety
Local schools can be partners in promoting
safe driver behavior during school pick-up
and drop offs. Education campaigns can
involve students promoting safer driving to
their parents, such as holding signs during
pick-up and drop offs that encourage safer
driving. Educational campaigns that involve
both students and parents can be more
impactful as they involve parents, who are
actually driving, and students, who may not
only remind their parents but also retain
safe driving behavior if they eventually drive.
Community
Engagement
Examples
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 664
EDUCATION
Culturally Relevant Engagement
Community engagement is not a
one-size-fits-all model as different
communities have different needs. By
developing culturally relevant engagement
strategies, all participants are invited into
conversations about safety. Culturally
relevant engagement strategies can help
education and programming around traffic
safety reach a larger audience and be more
impactful. For example, including cultural
markers of a local community, such as
contracting with popular local food vendors
to cater engagement activities, can be a
creative and welcoming way of engaging
residents. Meeting people "where they are"
to gather input on safety issues at local
parks can more effectively engage parents
and children rather than expecting families
to attend a meeting at a government
building.
Developing Education Materials Related to
Roadway Design Changes
Temporary demonstrations, like pop-up
installations, can physically showcase
proposed safety infrastructure to the public
and emergency response in a tangible way.
Lastly, preparing materials and videos
focused on new types of roadway design
and San Jacinto’s major violation issues (e.g.
speed, pedestrian crossings and nighttime
driving) can direct community conversations
for meaningful outcomes.
Partner with Community Experts
Local partners can serve as community
liaisons between the City and the public.
Working with community partners and
public institutions, such as the San Jacinto
Public Library, that have relationships with
residents strengthens the engagement
process by building trust and engaging an
established base of stakeholders. Local
partners can help tailor the engagement
process or help incorporate engagement
into existing programs and resources to
educate people more effectively about
roadway safety.
Education Program Efficacy
NHTSA has compiled a comprehensive
report on efficacy for programmatic safety
countermeasures in their Countermeasures
that Work (2017) report. This report
includes many education strategies, such as:
›Education regarding medication
›Driver education for younger and older
drivers
›Driver training for pedestrian and bicyclist
safety
›Bicycle safety education for children and
adults
However, research on the efficacy of
education programs is limited, and each of
these education countermeasures is rated
in the report as having still undetermined
effectiveness or limited/no high-quality
evaluation evidence.
LADOT Pop-Up
Installation
Enforcement
SFMTA Vision Zero
Informational Signs
City of Sacramento
Education Videos
Sources: LA Streetsblog
Vision Zero SF
City of Sacramento
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 65San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 65
Automated Speed Enforcement
Source: Traffic Technology Today
ENFORCEMENT
Equity Considerations
Enforcement of traffic laws is a common
strategy to increase street safety, but
historical enforcement techniques and
strategies have raised concerns about racial
profiling, police violence, and the impacts
of policing on communities of color. A 2020
study conducted by the California Racial
Identity Profiling Advisory Board using data
from the largest law enforcement agencies
in the State, including Riverside County
Sheriff, highlights the following:
›Traffic stops are the most frequent point
of contact between law enforcement and
the community. 79% of Riverside County
Sheriff stops are for a traffic violation.
›When compared to the overall share of
population, Black people account for a
disproportionate share of police stops by
Riverside County Sheriffs.
According to the US Department of Justice,
Black and Hispanic people are more likely
than white people to experience use of force
when they are stopped by police. To ensure
that efforts to improve safety recognize
that all people have the right to move about
their communities safely, cities have shifted
to equity-based strategies that target
specific reckless behaviors that pose the
highest safety risk while working to mitigate
potential inequities in enforcement. In 2020,
the Safe Routes to School Partnership
removed enforcement as part of its 6 E’s for
Safe Routes to School and replaced it with
engagement as a strategy for encouraging
safe travel to school. Also this year, the
Governor's Highway Safety Association
made recommendations to invest in social
programs to alleviate enforcement burdens
and prevent recidivism, along with training
for officers on topics of racism, bias, and
de-escalation.
Equity considerations can be considered in a
range of enforcement strategies, including:
›Progressive traffic fine structures, such
as a sliding scale for traffic fines based
on a driver’s income, developing payment
plans, or giving first offenders the
opportunity to take a safety class focuses
enforcement on behavior change.
›Analyzing available demographic data in
traffic citations can help the City of San
Jacinto understand if traffic enforcement
is being implemented universally or if
specific communities are experiencing
disparities in enforcement.
›Since enforcement practices, like traffic
stops, require the discretion of police
officers, it is possible for implicit bias to
affect how and to whom officers issue
traffic citations. Assessing traffic citation
demographic and geographic data can
help uncover inequities in policing and the
enforcement of traffic safety.
High Visibility Enforcement
High visibility enforcement is a multifaceted
approach to enforcement that involves
garnering public attention to traffic safety
laws through highly visibly patrols, such as
checkpoints: saturation patrols, or message
boards. Across several topic areas, high-
visibility enforcement is often the most
effective form of enforcement, in terms
of safety outcomes, according to NHTSA
research.
The goal of high visibility enforcement is
to promote voluntary compliance with
traffic laws. High visibility enforcement
can target specific traffic violations for a
short period of time to encourage drivers
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 666
to stop engaging in a traffic violation. For
example, speeding can be targeted in an
area so that the public is aware that speed
limits are enforced in the area. Another high
visibility enforcement strategy is publicized
sobriety checkpoints which are used to
deter impaired driving on national holidays
or weekends where more people are likely to
drink and drive.
Automated Enforcement
Automated enforcement, such as red-
light cameras or speed cameras, target
the specific drivers who are behaving
dangerously. A strictly data-driven approach
to automated enforcement might place
red-light or speed cameras in locations with
the highest number of collisions. California
is currently considering legislation to allow
automated speed enforcement.
Automated speed enforcement is highly
effective. According to a 2010 study on the
effectiveness of automated enforcement,
all 28 case-studies found a lower number
of crashes in the speed camera areas after
implementation of the program. Studies of
longer duration showed that these positive
trends were either maintained or improved
with time. Seattle saw the average number
of traffic violations decrease by 64% in a
two-year period after installation of speed
cameras. 90% of offenders in Seattle did not
receive another citation after being cited one
time for speeding.
Speed Limit Setting
The California Zero Traffic Fatalities Task
Force conducted a year-long study to
assess the existing speed limit setting
methodology in California. The Task Force
found that the existing methodology, which
sets speed limits as the 85th percentile of
speed and traffic surveys, is not flexible
enough to meet the needs of urban areas,
and recommends the development of a new
context-sensitive approach that sets speed
limits to prioritize safety for all users. Lower
maximum speed limits reduce crashes and
fatalities. While lower posted speeds can
help reduce crashes, they are more effective
at encouraging driving at desired speeds
when implemented through comprehensive
efforts including installation of road safety
improvements or enforcement. While no
statewide change to the 85th percentile
has been made yet, there is a near-term
opportunity for San Jacinto to conduct
speed surveys after safety-related roadway
improvements have been implemented,
which may result in an opportunity for
setting lower posted speeds.
Beyond Traditional Enforcement
Alternatives to law enforcement involve
investing in cross-sector partnerships to
promote traffic safety. Alternatives include:
›Community partners can be hired as
Street Safety Ambassadors and canvas
along corridors where there are severe
traffic fatalities or where communities
are experiencing the most traffic
stops or tickets for traffic violations.
Hiring community members as Street
Safety Ambassadors also serves as
an opportunity to build trust between
government agencies and the public since
community partners typically have pre-
existing relationships in the community.
›Hiring Social Workers, Mental Health
Counselors, Addiction Specialists, and
other unarmed specifically trained
professionals can serve as a supplement
to traffic enforcement.
›Partnering with local departments of
mental health and public health can de-
escalate traffic enforcement by treating
traffic safety violations as a public safety
issue.
›De-escalating traffic enforcement through
government partnerships with public-
facing agencies can also work to foster
trust with the public during moments
where there are national discussions on
public safety regarding the police. For
example, the City of Oakland partners
with parking enforcement to enforce
traffic laws in a deliberate effort to disarm
the enforcement of traffic violations. This
approach shifts traffic safety to non-
sworn officers while still enforcing traffic
laws.
Lower Speed Limits in
School Zone
Source: Tim Berger/
Burbank Leader
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 67
Enforcement Efficacy
NHTSA has compiled a comprehensive
report on efficacy for enforcement safety
countermeasures in their Countermeasures
that Work (2017) report. This report
includes many enforcement strategies, and
those with the highest safety efficacy rating
are listed below:
›Publicized sobriety checkpoints
›High-visibility DUI patrols
›High-Visibility seat belt laws enforcement
›Communications and outreach supporting
enforcement efforts
›High-visibility child restraint laws
enforcement
›Automated speed enforcement
›Speed limits
›High-visibility cell phone laws
enforcement
›Learner's permit and intermediate driver
license restrictions, including nighttime
and passengers
›License screening, testing and restrictions
for older drivers
›Pedestrian Safety Zones, pairing
enforcement and education with
engineering countermeasures at a specific
location
State Street & 7th Street
Strategies for DUI Collisions
Driving under the influence is a major factor in
fatal and severe collisions that is most effectively
addressed through enforcement and related
strategies. Three types of policy instruments have
been used to reduce rates of driving under the
influence:
›deterrence
›prevention
›limited access
Deterrence policies focus on raising the actual and
perceived risk of detection of driving under the
influence. These policies should be highly visible to
increase awareness of the risks of driving under the
influence. Publicized sobriety checkpoints, saturation
patrol, and other forms of high visibility enforcement
are effective for safety outcomes.
Prevention and education policies focus on
mobilizing and educating the community, and
intervening before driving under the influence
takes place. According to NHTSA research, alcohol
problem assessment and treatment programs, as
well as alcohol intervention in settings such as a
doctor's office, are highly effective strategies for
improving safety outcomes. Partnerships with
healthcare providers in San Jacinto can be an
important piece of combating DUIs.
Other opportunities include partnering with TNCs
(e.g. Lyft or Uber) to reduce drinking and driving can
help promote safety on the road and prevent fatal
and severe collisions.
Limited access policies focus on making underage
access to alcohol and drugs more difficult and
limiting excessive alcohol consumption.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 668
Trauma Care
Effective emergency trauma care can
increase crash survival rates by as much
as 25 percent, and an effective county-
wide trauma care coordination system
can reduce fatalities by 50 percent. Key
factors that influence the survivability of
crashes are: proximity to care (how near
is an appropriate trauma care center),
response time, equipment, technology, and
EMS training. The faster a traumatic injury
victim receives medical care, the higher the
chances are of preventing death.
Recommended strategies to improve
trauma care include providing funding for
appropriate first responder equipment (e.g.
hydraulic and pneumatic extrication tools),
research and adoption of technology aimed
at reducing triage time (e.g. automatic
vehicle reporting of severe crashes to EMS,
EMS vehicle collision avoidance systems,
and geolocation of nearest appropriate EMS
vehicles), and promotion of federal and
state-certified training programs. Expanded
access to and number of trauma care
facilities is another major factor in improving
outcomes for crash victims (Riverside
Community Hospital is now a Level 1 trauma
center). Enhanced partnership between the
City and Riverside County along with the
development of public education campaigns
(regarding the “move over” law) can ensure
greater safety for victims, first responders
and other road users.
Data Sharing
Sharing data regarding on-scene time,
patient destination and patient outcomes
(as allowable by privacy law) would
allow San Jacinto to effectively monitor
triage performance and EMS system
effectiveness. Issuing annual research
regarding the findings could assist with
increasing transparency and accountability
to the public. Other strategies for improving
data sharing could include comparing and
merging EMS and hospital data with police
and other relevant agency records to better
inform policies, projects, programs and
needed data quality improvements. Equity
variables could be evaluated to document
potential inequities related to homelessness,
race/ethnicity, language, income, and
immigration status to guide policy for
addressing disproportionate trauma
and fatalities.
Fatal Crash Response Team
In the event of a traffic fatality, analysis
and evaluation is a key towards addressing
the burden of traffic mortality and tracking
progress towards eliminating fatalities
on San Jacinto’s roads. One strategy is to
establish a cross-agency fatal crash team of
EMS, police, transportation, public health,
and City officials to convene at the crash site
after a fatal crash. This would assist with
accurate investigation and documentation
of potentially relevant infrastructural
and environmental crash factors, while
identifying other additional response factors
that may have contributed to the fatal
crash outcome.
EMERGENCY SERVICES
Traffic collision victims have a higher
chance of survival if they can quickly
receive medical care. In many cases, law
enforcement officers and fire department
staff are the first responders to arrive at a
collision location. In addition to equipping
all first responders with the appropriate
training, improving response times for
Emergency Medical Services will help
improve collision victims’ chances of
survival. Traffic crashes can also put first
responders’ and other road users’ lives at
risk due to increased congestion, which may
lead to secondary crashes.
Strategies to improve response time
and safety for EMS include designing
emergency vehicles to be highly visible
(e.g. retroreflective striping and chevrons,
high-visibility paint, and built-in passive
light) and implementing emergency vehicle
signal preemption, which allows emergency
vehicles to break a normal signal cycle and
proceed through an intersection.
Lastly, emergency responders can use data
collected on historical medical care in the
City to improve care and use
best practices.
An Additional E: Epidemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has
deeply impacted travel behavior,
with more people traveling less
frequently and/or changing
transportation modes in order
to follow social distancing
mandates. What this means
for traffic safety is currently
being examined by public health
and transportation experts—
preliminary reports state that
while the overall number of
crashes are down due to less
driving, overall crash rates per
vehicle miles traveled (VMT) are
higher. In California, the number
of severe and fatal crash rates
is estimated to have gone up by
14.6%.
One suggested strategy to curb
dangerous driving behaviors and
provide safe space for physically-
distant walking and biking
include implementing a program
like Oakland’s and Los Angeles’s
Slow Streets (soft street closures
on local streets). To ensure that
residents have safe access to
essential services, as part of its
Slow Streets program, Oakland
has also temporarily improved
pedestrian crossings at key
destinations (e.g. grocery stores
and COVID-19 testing sites) in
high-priority neighborhoods
selected using equity indicators
such as race and income. Public
education campaigns focused
on discouraging speeding and
drinking and driving can also
aid in changing travel behaviors
formed as a result of COVID-19.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 69
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
Recent advancements in transportation
technology have not only introduced new
transportation modes and travel patterns,
but have also presented opportunities to
better understand travel behavior and
encourage safe behavior. The proliferation
of new mobility devices, services and
technologies (e.g. ridehailing services) have
presented numerous needs and options
for addressing road safety. Among these
new technologies, artificial intelligence
allows for more detailed data collection
and the proliferation of autonomous vehicle
(AV) usage. AVs have potential to reduce
human error and improve street safety,
but AVs also incur different challenges. The
following represent a summary of emerging
technology trends related to safety.
Near Miss Data
Near misses have historically been difficult
to study in practical safety applications due
to an overall lack of reported information.
In the absence of sufficient crash data,
near miss data is an important indicator for
guiding crash prevention. There are several
technologies detailed below that are closing
the gap and providing key safety insights
regarding near misses:
Video Data
›Video machine learning is an effective
means of classifying collisions and
collecting near miss data. The City
should consider investing in these
technologies (e.g. along key roadways and
intersections) to proactively enact safety
countermeasures.
Incidence Data from Connected Vehicles
›With the capability of vehicles to capture
and transmit real-time data on driver
behavior wirelessly, these data are
increasingly becoming an integral part of
reporting near misses especially given the
introduction of AVs on public roadways.
Public Crowdsourcing
›Online web crowdsourcing platforms,
like UC Berkeley’s SafeTREC Street Story
tool, allow anyone to anecdotally report
incidents of near misses. These data
are available publicly for analysis and
contain important contextual information
based on geographic location (e.g. road
conditions, street lighting and travel
mode). Utilizing a platform like Street
Story could also advance community
education and engagement around
road safety.
Data Collection and Management
Up-to-date data on transportation
infrastructure, including roadway
characteristics, intersection characteristics,
and signs, is valuable for planning and
implementing future improvements. Service
providers that can assist with this work
include:
›Mapillary, uses crowdsourced or privately
provided street level imagery to extract
and map signs, street lamps, sidewalks,
signals, and other objects. https://www.
mapillary.com/
›EcopiaTech uses satellite imagery to
extract features such as road centerlines,
roadway cross-sections, sidewalks, and
more. https://www.ecopiatech.com/
Smart Signal Technology
As part of its strategy to bolster road safety,
San Jacinto could explore the feasibility
of deploying smart signal technology
on its roads. Smart signal technology
enables cities to collect data along multiple
intersections, providing high-resolution data
on how people are using the roadway in real
time. Connected vehicles are another part of
this system. They wirelessly communicate
with other vehicles and infrastructure (like
signals) to provide data for instantaneous
decision-making (e.g. reporting driver
speed or collisions). Data from signals in
combination with data from vehicles can
allow for real time speed-related signal
operations, allowing for enhanced safety
through adaptable systems.
AV Readiness Planning
Having strategies prepared to meet and
address the oncoming challenges posed by
AV technology will be crucial in advancing
road safety in San Jacinto. Fully automated
vehicles have the potential to transform
travel behavior and safety outcomes given
that AVs are ultimately designed to operate
without any human intervention. Some
strategies for preparation include educating
the public on current and future safety
features and limitations, developing signing
and striping standards, and conducting
reviews of equity implications. Without
appropriate research and guidance, AVs
could widen accessibility and safety gaps for
vulnerable communities.
AV technology is still
developing, and there will
be an adoption period
where people will need
time to grow accustomed
to interacting with AVs.
Cities will be faced with
making decisions if AVs
will be allowed to operate
on local streets and will
need to create policies
and programs to respond
to the proliferation
of AVs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Emphasis Areas & Strategies
Chapter 7
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 71
The following ten emphasis areas are a
combination of five priority locations and
five collision types that were selected based
on the number of total collisions, number
of fatal and severe injury (KSI) collisions,
and stakeholder input. Each emphasis area
is presented on a cutsheet that includes a
collision summary, location summary, safety
goals, strategies to help the City achieve
the identified goals, and relevant grant
opportunities.
1. San Jacinto Ave | Menlo Ave to 7th St
2. State St | De Anza Dr to 9th St
3. Ramona Expwy | Lyon Ave to Eagle Rd
4. E Esplanade Ave | Hewitt St to Merdian St
5. Ramona Expwy & Sanderson Ave
6. Nighttme Collisions Involving Bicyclists or Pedestrians
7. Collisons Involving Alcohol
8. Broadside Collisons at Major Unsignalized Intersections
9. Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions Near Schools
10. Collisions Involving Pedestrians In Road
The location summary for each emphasis
area includes the violations and collision
types that account for the most severe
or highest number of collisions, which are
included in the key issues in Chapter 5.
The strategies, which were selected
to address the collision types and
violations and contribute to achieving
the safety-related goals, are separated
into primary countermeasures and
secondary countermeasures. Primary
countermeasures correspond to the factors
identified in the location summary and are
best suited for competitive HSIP grant
applications. Secondary countermeasures
are additional recommended strategies
based on the existing infrastructure, field
observations, and stakeholder input.
Each emphasis area also indicates if the
collisions are located in or near a school,
retail, park or a census tract that is
categorized as a Disadvantaged Community,
defined by Senate Bill 535 and Assembly Bill
1550. Proximity to schools, parks and retail
was defined as within a 1,000 ft radius.
Unit cost estimates represent general unit
costs based on prior Southern California or
statewide projects, and are not specific to
the location. High-level benefit estimates
assume a crash cost-based benefit related
to all relevant (e.g. bike/ped or nighttime)
collisions for a location or collision type, to
allow for an apples-to-apples comparison
of countermeasures. More information on
benefit calculations can be found in the
LRSM, page A-55. Further engineering
studies will be required to develop more
detailed estimates and designs.
CONSIDERATIONS FOR SANDERSON
Sanderson Avenue, from Cottonwood
Avenue to Ramona Expressway, was
under consideration as a corridor hotspot
emphasis area due to the high number of
total collisions (55) and KSI collisions (15).
This corridor was ultimately not included as
one of the ten emphasis areas because the
City is in the process of implementing safety
improvements that address the top collision
types along this corridor, which include
collisions with a hit object, overturned
vehicle, and occurring at night. The City is
installing rumble strips, speed radar signs,
crash attenuators around power poles, and
shoulder improvements. The City upgraded
approximately 2,000 streetlights throughout
the city, including along Sanderson Avenue,
to LED in 2019. The City also installed a
traffic signal at the Ramona Boulevard &
Sanderson Avenue intersection in late 2017.
13 of the 14 collisions at this intersection
occurred prior to the signal installation.
The City may consider installing additional
object markers along Sanderson, to further
denote culvert headwall locations for driver
awareness.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 772
NEAR SCHOOL
San Jacinto Avenue Menlo Avenue to 7th Street
COLLISION SUMMARY LOCATION SUMMARY
PRIMARY COUNTERMEASURES
RELEVANT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES
VIOLATIONS
HSIP ATPIN DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
SECONDARY COUNTERMEASURES
GOALS
TYPE OF EMPHASIS AREA
CORRIDOR HOT SPOT
NEAR RETAIL
OF CITYWIDE
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN KSI COLLISIONS
31%
KSI COLLISIONS11
TOTAL COLLISIONS25
›Advanced Stop Bar
›High-Visibility Crosswalks
›Pedestrian Refuge Island
›Refresh pavement markings
›Widen sidewalks
›Speed feedback signs
›Signal interconnectivity and
coordination
›Green conflict striping at intersections
COUNTERMEASURE ISSUE AREA TIME FRAME UNIT COST BENEFIT
Install Additional Warning Signs To Address Broadside Short $350 each $7.4m
Add Lighting To Address Nighttime, Gaps in Lighting Medium $10,000 each $18.6m
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon To Address Pedestrian Crossing
Outside Crosswalk Medium $200,000 per
location $54.3m
Road Diet To Address Unsafe Speed Long $80,000 per mile $29.6m
Separated Bike Lanes To Address Wrong Side of the Road (Bicycle)Long $1,250,000 per
mile $44.5m
Install Sidewalk To Address Pedestrian in Road Long $45 per sf $79m
Turn Restrictions/Medians To Address Improper Turning Long $60 per sf $49.4m
›Reduce the number of collisions
involving pedestrians and bicyclists.
›Improve pedestrian safety with
infrastructure improvements that fill
pedestrian network gaps and enhance
visibility between people who are
driving and people who are walking.
›Improve pedestrian and bicyclist
visibility at night.
›Encourage lower vehicle speeds with
roadway design and signage.ROADWAY AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS
›4 travel lanes
›45 mph speed limit
›Gaps in lighting
›Broadside
›Nighttime
COLLISION TYPES
›Unsafe speed
›Improper turning
›Pedestrian crossing outside of crosswalk
›Pedestrian in road
›Wrong side of the road (bicycle)
COLLISIONS INVOLVING SOMEONE WALKING OR BIKING
SB821NEAR PARK
See pg 71 for source and limitations of data, including costs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 14.1.b
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 774
COLLISION SUMMARY LOCATION SUMMARY
PRIMARY COUNTERMEASURES
RELEVANT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES
VIOLATIONS
HSIP IN DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
SECONDARY COUNTERMEASURES
GOALS
TYPE OF EMPHASIS AREA
CORRIDOR HOT SPOT
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIANCOLLISIONS 10
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
KSI COLLISIONS4
KSI COLLISIONS9
TOTAL COLLISIONS53
COUNTERMEASURE ISSUE AREA TIME FRAME UNIT COST BENEFIT
Extend Yellow/All Red Time To Address Broadside, Signal and Sign Violations Short $500 per location $7.1m
Leading Pedestrian Interval and
Pedestrian Recall To Address Pedestrian Crossing in Crosswalk,
Pedestrian Crossing Outside Crosswalk Short $500 per location $10.9m
Speed Feedback Signs To Address Unsafe Speed Short $22,500 each N/A
Retroreflective Tape on Signals To Address Broadside, Signal and Sign Violations Short $150 per signal head $7.2m
Advance Stop Bar To Address Pedestrian Crossing in Crosswalk Short $200 each $2.7m
High Visibility Crosswalk
(+ straighten crosswalks)To Address Pedestrian Crossing in Crosswalk,
Pedestrian Crossing Outside Crosswalk Short $35 per lf $9.1m
Protected Left Turns To Address Broadside Medium $150,000 per approach $28.6m
Turn Restrictions/Medians To Address Broadside, Improper Turning Medium $60 per sf $47.7m
Lighting To Address Nighttime Medium $10,000 each $16.4m
›Consider Major Intersection
Reconstruction to Provide Two Squared
Up Intersections
›Extended Striping Through Intersection
›Install Slip Lanes for Right Turns
›Consider New Pedestrian Crossing with
Enhanced Safety Features
›Centerline Hardening
›Install Sidewalks
›Signal Interconnectivity and
Coordination
›Improve visibility, particularly at skewed
intersections.
›Increase convenience and comfort for
pedestrians crossing at intersections.
›Decrease prevelance of red light
running and improper turning violations.
NEAR SCHOOL
›45 mph
›4-5 lanes
ROADWAY AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS
›Broadside
›Nighttime
COLLISION TYPES
›Unsafe Speeds
›Improper Turning
›Pedestrian Crossing (both in crosswalk and
outside of crosswalk)
›Note: High level of “traffic signal and sign”
violations (not a top citywide violation)
State Street De Anza Drive to 9th Street
OTS ATPNEAR PARKNEAR RETAIL SB821
See pg 71 for source and limitations of data, including costs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 24.1.b
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 776
COLLISION SUMMARY LOCATION SUMMARY
PRIMARY COUNTERMEASURES
RELEVANT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES
VIOLATIONS
HSIP ATPNEAR PARK
SECONDARY COUNTERMEASURES
GOALS
TYPE OF EMPHASIS AREA
CORRIDOR HOT SPOT
ROADWAY AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS
KSI COLLISIONS11
TOTAL COLLISIONS56
›Narrow Lanes
›Separated Bike Lanes
›High-Visibility Crosswalks
›Speed feedback signs
›Advanced Stop Bar
›Pedestrian Refuge Island
›Signal interconnectivity and
coordination
›Install delineators, reflectors and/or
object markers
COUNTERMEASURE ISSUE AREA TIME FRAME UNIT COST BENEFIT
Shorten Signal Cycle Length
and Pedestrian Recall To Address Pedestrian Crossing
Outside Crosswalk Short $500 per location $8.4m
Green Conflict Striping To Address Broadside (Bicycle)Short $9 per sf N/A
Extend Yellow and Red Timing To Address Broadside Short $500 per location $8.4m
Lighting To Address Nighttime, Hit Object Medium $10,000 each $23.3m
Retroreflective Tape on Signals To Address Unsafe Speed Medium $150 per signal head $8.4m
Dynamic Speed Warning Sign To Address Curves Medium $22,500 each $16.9m
Median Barrier To Address Pedestrian Crossing
Outside Crosswalk Long $75 per lf $28.2m
›Improve bicycle visibility at
intersections.
›Decrease speeding and increase driver
awareness as the roadway transitions
between a more rural and residential/
commercial context.
›Increase driver awareness of curves.
NEAR RETAILNEAR SCHOOL IN DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
COLLISION TYPES
›6 travel lanes
›55 mph speed limit
›Curves
›Gaps in lighting
›Broadside (incl. Bicycle)
›Hit Object
›Nighttime
›Driver at Fault Proceeding Straight
›Unsafe Speed
›Improper Turning
›Crossing Outside Crosswalk (Ped)
›Wrong Side of the Road (Bicycle)
Ramona Expressway Lyon Avenue to Eagle Road
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIANCOLLISIONS 7
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
KSI COLLISIONS 3
SB821
See pg 71 for source and limitations of data, including costs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 34.1.b
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 778
COLLISION SUMMARY LOCATION SUMMARY
PRIMARY COUNTERMEASURES
RELEVANT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES
VIOLATIONS
NEAR RETAIL HSIP ATPNEAR PARK IN DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
SECONDARY COUNTERMEASURES
GOALS
TYPE OF EMPHASIS AREA
CORRIDOR HOT SPOT
KSI COLLISIONS3
TOTAL COLLISIONS28
COLLISION TYPES
ROADWAY AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS
COUNTERMEASURE ISSUE AREA TIME FRAME UNIT COST BENEFIT
Speed Feedback Sign To Address Unsafe Speeding Short $22,500 each N/A
Flashing Beacons as Advanced Warning To Address Broadside, Curves Medium $20,000 each $2.7m
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon To Address Pedestrian Crossing
Outside Crosswalk Medium $40,000 per
crossing $3.7m
Install Additional Warning Signs To Address Broadside Medium $350 each $2.7m
Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing with
Enhanced Safety Features To Address Pedestrian Crossing Outside
Crosswalk Medium $35 lf + add'l
elements $3.7m
Turn Restrictions/Medians To Address Broadside Medium $60 per sf $18.2m
All-Way Stop Control To Address Broadside, Pedestrian Crossing
Outside Crosswalk Medium $800 per location $9.1m
Road Diet To Address Unsafe Speed Long $80,000 per mile $10.9m
›Raised Pedestrian Crossing
›Pedestrian Refuge Island
›Curb Extensions
›Separated Bike Lanes
›Increase pedestrian visibility with
enhanced striping and signage,
especially near schools and parks.
›Identify locations with high pedestrian
activity without marked crossing
opportunities.
›Encourage multi-modal transportation
with multi-modal infrastructure and
lower vehicle speeds.
›Increase driver awareness of curves.
›4 Lanes
›40 mph speed limit
›Curves
›Major unsignalized intersections
›Broadside
›Victims Under 19
›Unsafe speed
›Pedestrian Crossing Outside Crosswalk
East Esplanade Avenue Hewitt Street to Meridian Street
NEAR SCHOOL
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIANCOLLISIONS 6
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
KSI COLLISIONS 1
SB821
See pg 71 for source and limitations of data, including costs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 44.1.b
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 780
NEAR SCHOOL
COLLISION SUMMARY LOCATION SUMMARY
PRIMARY COUNTERMEASURES
RELEVANT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES
HSIP IN DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
SECONDARY COUNTERMEASURES
GOALS
NEAR RETAIL
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN COLLISION (NON-KSI) 1
KSI COLLISIONS4
TOTAL COLLISIONS33
COUNTERMEASURE ISSUE AREA TIME FRAME UNIT COST BENEFIT
Retroreflective Tape on Signals To Address Unsafe Speed, Broadside Short $150 per signal head $3.5m
Extend Yellow and All Red Time To Address Broadside Short $500 per location $3.5m
Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection To Address Unsafe Speed, Broadside Short $50,000 per location $9.3m
Lighting To Address Nighttime Medium $10,000 each $9.4m
Supplemental Signal Heads To Address Unsafe Speed, Broadside Long $1,095 each $3.5m
›Install lane line extensions at
intersection for left-turning vehicles
›Flashing beacon to alert vehicles
traveling eastbound on Ramona
Expressway of the upcoming
intersection
›Signal Interconnectivity and
Coordination
›Remove 1 Left-Turn Lane NB and SB
›Red Light Camera
›Reduce frequency of intersection
conflicts using traffic control and
intersection enhancements.
›Increase driver awareness of
intersection and signal controls
with advance warning signs and by
enhancing signal visibility.
NEAR PARK
ROADWAY AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS
›4 lanes
›55+ mph speed limit
COLLISION TYPES
›Broadside
›Nighttime
›Driver at fault proceeding straight
VIOLATIONS
›Unsafe Speed
TYPE OF EMPHASIS AREA
INTERSECTION HOT SPOT
Ramona Expressway & Sanderson Avenue
See pg 71 for source and limitations of data, including costs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 54.1.b
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 782
COLLISION SUMMARY LOCATION SUMMARY
PRIMARY COUNTERMEASURES
COLLISION TYPES
VIOLATIONS
NEAR PARK IN DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
›Unsafe Speed
›Wrong Side of Road (Bicycle)
›Crossing Outside of Crosswalk (Ped)
›Pedestrian In Road
SECONDARY COUNTERMEASURES
GOALS
OF CITYWIDE
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN KSI COLLISIONS
74%
KSI COLLISIONS26
TOTAL COLLISIONS57
At existing crossings, enhance with:
›Advanced Stop Bar
›High-Visibility Crosswalks
COUNTERMEASURE ISSUE AREA TIME FRAME UNIT COST BENEFIT
Green-Conflict Striping at Intersection To Address Broadside Short $9 per sf N/A
Reflectors Along Shoulder in Rural Areas To Address Nighttime and Pedestrian in Road Short $40 each $17.4m
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon To Address Pedestrian Crossing
Outside of Crosswalk
Medium $40,000 per
crossing
$81.4m
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon To Address Pedestrian Crossing
Outside of Crosswalk
Long $200,000 per
crossing
$127.9m
Road Diet To Address Unsafe Speed Long $80,000 per mile $69.8m
Add Lighting To Address Nighttime Long $10,000 each $81.4m
Separated Bike Lanes To Address Wrong Side of Road (Bicycle)Long $1,250,000 per
mile
$104.6m
Add Sidewalks To Address Pedestrian in Road Long $45 per sf $186.1m
›Provide separate and protected
facilities for people who walk and bike.
›Increase visibility for people who drive,
walk, and bike at night with intersection,
roadway, and pedestrian lighting.
›Improve visibility of bicyclists and
pedestrians at intersections.ROADWAY AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS
›Unsignalized intersections and midblock
›Primarily along roads with 4+ travel lanes and a few in residential neighborhoods (2 lanes)
›Primarily 40+ mph speed limit
›Gaps in Lighting or Missing Lighting
›Broadside
›Nighttime
Nighttime Collisions Involving Bicyclists or Pedestrians
6PM TO 6AM
TYPE OF EMPHASIS AREA
COLLISION TYPE
RELEVANT GRANTS OPPORTUNITIES
NEAR RETAILNEAR SCHOOL HSIP ATP SB821
See pg 71 for source and limitations of data, including costs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 83
RECOMMENDATIONS
Install Sidewalks, Pedestrian Hybrid
Beacons, Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
to provide safer pedestrian facilities and
additional crossing opportunities.
Consider installing Separated Bike Lanes and
Green Conflicting Striping at Intersection to
provide separated space for bikes and reduce
conflicts at intersections. Reference the Trails
Master Plan for more guidance on design and
proposed facility locations.
Install Intersection Lighting and Segment
Lighting where gaps currently exist.
Consider Road Diet where ADT allows.
Idyllwild Dr
7th St
Washington Ave
1st StSanderson AveLyons AveState StSan Jacinto AveSanta Fe AveHewitt StMain St
De Anza Dr
N Warren RdRamona Blvd
Ramona Ex
p
y
Cottonwood Ave
W Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
7th St
R
a
mona ExpyS
o
boba RdPark Ave
79
E Es
p
l
anade Ave
.Miles
Nighttime Collisions Involving Bicyclists
Fatal and Severe Collisions (4)
All Other Collisions (21)
Nighttime Collisions Involving Pedestrians
Fatal and Severe Collisions (22)
All Other Collisions (10)
As an interim measure, consider installing
Reflectors Along Shoulder in Rural Areas to
mark separation of bicycle and pedestrian
spaces when sidewalk or bike facilities are
not available.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 784
COLLISION SUMMARY LOCATION SUMMARY
PRIMARY COUNTERMEASURES
RELEVANT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES
VIOLATIONS
NEAR RETAIL HSIP NEAR PARK IN DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
SECONDARY COUNTERMEASURES
GOALS
OF CITYWIDE KSI COLLISIONS 27%
KSI COLLISIONS30
TOTAL COLLISIONS126
›Publicized Sobriety Checkpoints and
Patrols
›Alcohol Penalty Policies (e.g. License
Suspension)
›Public Health Partnerships (e.g. Alcohol
Screening and Intervention)
COUNTERMEASURE ISSUE AREA TIME FRAME UNIT COST BENEFIT
Extend Yellow and All Red Time To Address Broadside Short $500 per location $22.1m
Impact Attenuators To Address Hit Object Medium $50,000 each $36.9m
Median Barrier To Address Under the Influence Medium $75 per lf $73.8m
Guard Rails To Address Hit Object Medium $50 per lf $73.8m
Edgeline Rumble Strips To Address Hit Object Medium $1 per lf $22.1m
Add Lighting To Address Nighttime Long $10,000 each $79m
OTS
›Reduce severity of collisions caused
by driving under the influence with
roadway design.
›Reduce Driving Under the Influence
with Enforcement and Partnerships.
ROADWAY AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS:
COLLISION TYPES
›Primarily on roads with 4+ travel lanes
›Primarily at Major intersections and midblock
›Broadside
›Hit Object
›Nighttime
›Under the Influence
›Unsafe Speed
TYPE OF EMPHASIS AREA
COLLISION TYPE
Collisions Involving Alcohol
NEAR SCHOOL
See pg 71 for source and limitations of data, including costs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 85
Install Edgleline Rumble Strips to help
drivers correct for lane departures before a
collision occurs.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Install Guard Rails, Impact Attenuators and
Median Barriers to help mitigate severity of
lane departure collisions.
Consider Extending Yellow and All Red Time
to mitigate potential conflicts at signals.
Installing Intersection Lighting and Segment
Lighting to support visibility at night.Idyllwild Dr
7th St
Washington Ave
1st StSanderson AveLyons AveState StSan Jacinto AveSanta Fe AveHewitt StMain St
De Anza Dr
N Warren RdRamona Blvd
Ramona Ex
p
y
Cottonwood Ave
W Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
7th St
R
a
mona ExpyS
o
boba RdPark Ave
79
E Es
p
l
anade Ave
.Miles
Collisions Involving Alcohol
Fatal and Severe Collisions (30)
All Other Collisions (96)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 786
COLLISION SUMMARY LOCATION SUMMARY
PRIMARY COUNTERMEASURES
RELEVANT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES
NEAR RETAIL HSIP NEAR PARK IN DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
SECONDARY COUNTERMEASURES
GOALS
OF CITYWIDEKSI COLLISIONS9%
KSI COLLISIONS10
TOTAL COLLISIONS135
COUNTERMEASURE ISSUE AREA TIME FRAME UNIT COST BENEFIT
Upgrade to Larger or Install Additional Warning Signs To Address Broadside Short $350 each $10.5m
Upgrade Intersection Pavement Markings To Address Broadside Short $4 per sf $17.5m
Turn Restrictions/Medians To Address Broadside Medium $60 per sf $70m
Directional Median Opening To Address Broadside Medium $60 per sf $70m
Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections To Address Broadside Long $60 per sf $70m
Install Signal To Address Broadside Long $350,000 per
location $42m
Roundabout To Address Broadside Long $400,000 each Varies
COLLISION TYPES
ROADWAY AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS:
›Major Unsignalized Intersections
›Broadside (31% of collisions involved
a vehicle making a left turn)
TYPE OF EMPHASIS AREA
COLLISION TYPE
Broadside Collisions at Major Unsignalized Intersections
NEAR SCHOOL
›Reduce number and severity
of broadside collisions at major
unsignalized intersections.
›Reduce number and severity of left-
turn collisions at major unsignalized
intersections.
›Improve sightlines at major unsignalized
intersections through vegetation
management program
See pg 71 for source and limitations of data, including costs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 87
Consider installing New Signals or
Roundabouts ,where warranted, to provide
additional control for opposing movements
at intersections. Consider roundabout size -
one-lane roundabouts may offer more safety
benefit than multi-lane. Roundabouts and
signals should be designed with enhanced
bicycle and pedestrian safety features
to mitigate conflict issues and provide
comfortable crossings.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Upgrade Intersection Pavement Markings
and upgrade to Larger or Install Additional
Warning Signs to bring driver awareness to
two-way stop controlled intersections.
Consider installing Directional Median
Openings and Turn Restrictions to mitigate
left-turn broadside collisions at driveways
and two-way stop controlled intersections.
Consider installing Reduced Left-Turn
Conflict Intersections to mitigate left-turn
conflicts at driveways and minor roadways.
Idyllwild Dr
7th St
Washington Ave
1st StSanderson AveLyons AveState StSan Jacinto AveSanta Fe AveHewitt StMain St
De Anza Dr
N Warren RdRamona Blvd
Ramona Ex
p
y
Cottonwood Ave
W Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
7th St
R
a
mona ExpyS
o
boba RdPark Ave
79
E Es
p
l
anade Ave
.Miles
Broadside Collisions at Major Unsignalized Intersections
Fatal and Severe Collisions (10)
All Other Collisions (125)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 788
COLLISION SUMMARY LOCATION SUMMARY
PRIMARY COUNTERMEASURES
RELEVANT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES
COLLISION TYPES
VIOLATIONS
RISK FACTORS
NEAR RETAIL HSIP NEAR PARK IN DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
SECONDARY COUNTERMEASURES
GOALS
For higher pedestrian volume locations or
larger roadways:
›Pedestrian Refuge Island
›Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
›Widen Sidewalk
COUNTERMEASURE ISSUE AREA TIME FRAME UNIT COST BENEFIT
Green Conflict Striping To Address Broadside (Bicycle)Short $9 per sf N/A
Daylight Intersection To Address Victims Under 19 Short $2 per lf $1.7m
Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing with Enhanced Safety Features To Address Pedestrian Crossing Outside Crosswalk Short $35 lf + add'l
elements $6.1m
Curb Extensions To Address Victims Under 19 Medium $45 per sf $6.1m
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon To Address Pedestrian Crossing Outside Crosswalk Medium $40,000 per
crossing $6.1m
Raised Pedestrian Crossing To Address Pedestrian Crossing Outside Crosswalk, Victims Under 19 Long $30,000 per location $6.1m
Install Sidewalks To Address Pedestrian In Road Long $45 per sf $13.9m
Separated Bike Lanes Bicycle Collisions Long $1,250,000 per mile $7.8m
›Reduce pedestrian and bicyclist
exposure to vehicular traffic by
upgrading or filling gaps in facilities,
such as bike lanes, sidewalks and
crosswalks.
›Improve sight distance and/or
visibility between motor vehicles and
pedestrians/bicyclists
›Encourage safe behavior with
community-wide sustained outreach
safety campaigns and targeted
outreach (e.g. partner with the school
district to enhance Safe Routes to
School)
OTS ATP
›2-3 lane roads with 25-35 mph speed limit
›Major unsignalized intersections
›Broadside (Bicycle)
›Victims Under 19
›Pedestrian Crossing Outside of Crosswalk
›Pedestrian in Road
OF CITYWIDE
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS
17%
KSI COLLISIONS1
TOTAL COLLISIONS21
TYPE OF EMPHASIS AREA
COLLISION TYPE6AM TO 6PM
Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions near Schools
NEAR SCHOOL SB821
See pg 71 for source and limitations of data, including costs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 89
Consider installing Separated Bike Lanes and
Green Conflicting Striping at Intersection
to provide separated space for bikes on
faster roadways and reduce conflicts at
intersections. Reference the Trails Master
Plan for more guidance on design and
proposed facility locations.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Enhance pedestrian crossings by Daylighting
Intersections with red curb and installing
Curb Extensions. Both of these strategies
improve sightlines at intersections and allow
for chldren to be seen more easily.
Idyllwild Dr
7th St
Washington Ave
1st StSanderson AveLyons AveState StSan Jacinto AveSanta Fe AveHewitt StMain St
De Anza Dr
N Warren RdRamona Blvd
Ramona Ex
p
y
Cottonwood Ave
W Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
7th St
R
a
mona ExpyS
o
boba RdPark Ave
79
E Es
p
l
anade Ave
.Miles
Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions near Schools
Fatal and Severe Collisions (1)
All Other Collisions (20)
Install Sidewalks where gaps currently exist
to provide access to and from schools.
Consider installing Uncontrolled Pedestrian
Crossing with Enhanced Safety Features
such as Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons
or Raised Pedestrian Crossings along two-
lane roadways near schools.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 790
COLLISION SUMMARY LOCATION SUMMARY
PRIMARY COUNTERMEASURES
RELEVANT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES
VIOLATIONS
HSIP NEAR PARK IN DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
SECONDARY COUNTERMEASURES
GOALS
COLLISION TYPES
ROADWAY AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS
TYPE OF EMPHASIS AREA
COLLISION TYPE
COUNTERMEASURE ISSUE AREA TIME FRAME UNIT COST BENEFIT
Delineators Along Paved Shoulder To Address Pedestrian In Road Short $40 each $6.1m
Pave Shoulder To Address Pedestrian In Road Medium $200 per ton $24.3m
Add Sidewalks To Address Pedestrian In Road Long $45 per sf $64.9m
Add Lighting To Address Nighttime Long $10,000 each $24.3m
For residential roadway locations:
›Painted centerline and raised pavement
markers at curves on residential streets
›Daylight Intersection
›Speed legends on pavement at
neighborhood entries
›Update markings on speed humps
OTS ATPNEAR RETAIL
›Improve pedestrian visibility at night
with lighting.
›Improve pedestrian safety with
infrastructure improvements that fill
pedestrian network gaps and enhance
existing pedestrian facilities.
›Increase awareness of people walking,
especially in residential areas.
›Residential roads (2-3 lanes with 15-25 mph speed limit)
and larger arterials (4-5 lanes with 40+ mph speed limit)
›Primarily mid-block
›Gaps in Lighting
›Nighttime
›Pedestrian in Road
Collisions Involving Pedestrian in Road
OF CITYWIDE
PEDESTRIAN KSI COLLISIONS
32%
KSI COLLISIONS9
TOTAL COLLISIONS21
NEAR SCHOOL SB821
See pg 71 for source and limitations of data, including costs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 91
RECOMMENDATIONS
Install Delineators along Paved Shoulder as
an interim measure where sidewalks are not
available, to provide separated space that is
visible at night.
Consider Paving Shoulder as an interim
measure where sidewalks are not available.
Install Sidewalks to provide separated space.Idyllwild Dr
7th St
Washington Ave
1st StSanderson AveLyons AveState StSan Jacinto AveSanta Fe AveHewitt StMain St
De Anza Dr
N Warren RdRamona Blvd
Ramona Ex
p
y
Cottonwood Ave
W Esplanade Ave
Ramona Expy
7th St
R
a
mona ExpyS
o
boba RdPark Ave
79
E Es
p
l
anade Ave
.Miles
Collisions Involving Pedestrians in Road
Fatal and Severe Injuries (9)
All Other Collisions (12)
Install Intersection Lighting and Segment
Lighting where current gaps exist, because
many of these collisions occur at night.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 792
GLOBAL RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the collision analysis, stakeholder
meetings, and field observation, several
countermeasures were identified
to be “global countermeasures,” or
countermeasures that can be applied
throughout the City. Each countermeasure
is accompanied by a brief description of the
safety benefit and applicability. Detailed
descriptions are in the countermeasure
toolbox (Chapter 6).
›Add or Upgrade to High-Visibility
Crosswalks: High-visibility crosswalks
have a striped pattern with markings
made of high-visibility material. All
existing and new marked crosswalks
should have high-visibility markings to
enhance pedestrian visibility and safety.
›Check Clearance Times: The City can
revisit yellow and all-red clearance times
based on the latest guidance. Additional
clearance time can allow for vehicles
that entered the intersection during
the yellow-change interval to clear the
intersection prior to the next phase. The
Traffic Control Devices Handbook, 2nd
Edition (Institute of Traffic Engineers,
2013) cites that calculating the duration
of red clearance intervals using the
current ITE guidelines has been shown to
reduce total crashes between 8 and 14
percent while reducing injury crashes by
approximately 12 percent.
›Pedestrian Crossing Time: Per the CA
MUTCD, crossing times should reflect a
3.5 ft/sec walking speed, though a slower
2.8 ft/sec timing may be appropriate in
some locations.
›Install Pedestrian Countdown Signals:
A pedestrian countdown signal displays
the number of seconds remaining for a
pedestrian to cross the intersection and
can help someone walking determine
if they have enough time to cross the
intersection. While the CA MUTCD
Section 4E.07 mandates the countdowns
be used in all locations where the
pedestrian change interval is more than
seven seconds, pedestrian countdown
signals can be installed at all signalized
intersections.
›Install or Upgrade ADA-Compliant
Facilities: To provide for the safe and
comfortable travel of all roadway
users, regardless of ability, new and
upgraded facilities throughout the City
should comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines
(ADAAG). The California Disabled
Accessibility Guidebook (CalDAG)
provides synthesized recommendations.
These facilities include:
› Curb Ramps: Directional curb ramps
are recommended over diagonal ramps.
Ramps should have a detectable
warning surface (e.g. truncated domes).
›Sidewalks should be at least five ft wide,
or with at least five ft of passing space
at regular intervals (less than 200 ft).
›Upgrade to 12-Inch Signal Heads:
Upgrading from existing 8-inch signal
heads to 12-inch signal heads complies
with the CA MUTCD guidelines and
improves visibility of traffic signals.
›Install Reflective Tape on Signals:
Retroreflective borders enhance the
visibility of traffic signals and can help
drivers recognize signals in areas where
they don’t expect to see a signal (e.g. after
a long stretch of roadway) or at nighttime
when visibility is limited.
›Upgrade Asphalt and Striping: Repaving
a road with fresh asphalt and upgrading
striping from paint to thermoplastic
can extend the lifetime and visibility
of roadway striping. Clearly visible
centerlines and lane lines can help drivers
stay in the appropriate lane and minimize
the potential for head-on and sideswipe
collisions.
›Upgrade Raised Pavement Markers:
Upgrading broken and replacing missing
raised pavement markers enhance the
visibility of centerlines and lane lines
along roadways. Clearly visible centerlines
and lane lines can help drivers stay in
the appropriate lane and minimize the
potential for head-on and sideswipe
collisions. Raised pavement markers
can also be added to striping through
intersections to provide enhanced
guidance at night.
›Install Advanced Stop Bars: An advanced
stop bar can be placed at signalized and
stop-controlled intersections to provide a
buffer between vehicles and pedestrians
crossing the intersection.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 93
San Jacinto Avenue & Midway Avenue
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Evaluation and
Implementation
Chapter 8
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 95
While the primary purpose of this
study is to prepare the City of San
Jacinto to submit successful Highway
Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
applications, safety projects can
be funded through a wide range of
additional sources at the regional,
state, and federal levels.
HSIP funds are largely awarded
based on a benefit/cost analysis
using a set of Caltrans-approved
countermeasures with documented
collision reduction factors and
historic collision data. While many
safety projects will perform well
in the HSIP process, others may
be successfully funded through
other sources that consider
additional factors, such as the Active
Transportation Program (ATP).
The sources in this chapter may
be used to fund a broad scope of
projects targeting air quality and
sustainability, affordable housing, and
transportation. Successful projects
often entail creative solutions
that address impact areas beyond
transportation safety alone.
FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
LOCAL AND REGIONAL SOURCES
Riverside County Transportation
Commission (RCTC) Transportation
Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Bicycle
and Pedestrian Facilities Program (SB 821)
Each year, 2% of the Local Transportation
Fund (LTF) revenue is made available for
bicycle and pedestrian facility projects
under TDA Article 3, also known as SB
821. Eligible projects include sidewalks,
access ramps, bicycle facilities, and bicycle
plan development. A Call for Projects is
issued biennially in February, and funds are
allocated each June.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
February 2021 (approx. $3.5 m available)
Riverside County Transportation
Commission (RCTC) Measure A
Riverside County’s first half-cent sales tax
for transportation improvements through
2039.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
--
SCAG Sustainable Communities Program
The Sustainable Communities Program
provides direct technical assistance to
SCAG member jurisdictions to complete
planning and policy efforts that enable
implementation of the regional SCS).
Grants are available in three categories:
Integrated Land Use, Active Transportation,
and Green Region.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Applications for the Active Transportation
and Safety (AT&S) grant were due
December 11, 2020
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 896
STATE SOURCES
California Strategic Growth Council (SGC)
Transformative Climate Communities
(TCC) Program
The Transformative Climate Communities
(TCC) Program empowers the communities
most impacted by pollution to choose
their own goals, strategies, and projects to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions and local
air pollution.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Round 3 applications were due
February 28, 2020
SGC Affordable Housing and Sustainable
Communities (AHSC) Program
The Affordable Housing and Sustainable
Communities (AHSC) Program makes
it easier for Californians to drive less
by making sure housing, jobs, and key
destinations are accessible by walking,
biking, and transit.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Round 6 applications will be due in 2021,
date TBD
Active Transportation Program (ATP)
ATP is a statewide competitive grant
application process with the goal of
encouraging increased use of active modes
of transportation. The ATP consolidates
existing federal and state transportation
programs, including the Transportation
Alternatives Program (TAP), Bicycle
Transportation Account (BTA), and State
Safe Routes to School (SR2S), into a single
program with a focus to make California a
national leader in active transportation. The
ATP administered by the Division of Local
Assistance, Office of State Programs.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Cycle 5 applications were due June 15, 2020.
The next cycle is expected in 2022.
SB 1 Local Streets and Roads
Program (LSRP)
SB 1 dedicated approximately $1.5 billion per
year in new formula revenues apportioned
by the State Controller to cities and counties
for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation,
and critical safety projects on the local
streets and roads system.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Project Lists were due to California
Transportation Commission May 1, 2020.
The next cycle is expected in 2021.
Caltrans Sustainable Communities Grants
To encourage local and regional planning
that furthers state goals, including, but
not limited to, the goals and best practices
cited in the Regional Transportation Plan
Guidelines adopted by the California
Transportation Commission.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Grant application due January 2021
California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS)
Grant Programs
OTS administers traffic safety grants in the
following areas: Alcohol Impaired Driving,
Distracted Driving, Drug-Impaired Driving,
Emergency Medical Services, Motorcycle
Safety, Occupant Protection, Pedestrian and
Bicycle Safety, Police Traffic Services, Public
Relations, Advertising, and Roadway Safety
and Traffic Records.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
FY 2022 application period is December 7,
2020 - January 31, 2021
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 97
SB 1 Solutions for Congested Corridors
Program (SCCP)
The Solutions for Congested Corridors
Program funds projects designed to
reduce congestion in highly traveled
and highly congested corridors. This
statewide, competitive program makes
$250 million available annually for projects
that implement specific transportation
performance improvements and are
part of a comprehensive corridor plan by
providing more transportation choices
while preserving the character of local
communities and creating opportunities for
neighborhood enhancement.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Applications were due July 17, 2020
SB1 Local Partnership Program (LPP)
The purpose of this program is to provide
local and regional transportation agencies
that have passed sales tax measures,
developer fees, or other imposed
transportation fees with a continuous
appropriation of $200 million annually from
the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Account to fund road maintenance and
rehabilitation, sound walls, and active
transportation projects. There is also a
competitive grant portion of this project.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Applications were due June 12, 2020
SB 1 State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP)
The State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) is the biennial five-year
plan for future allocations of certain state
transportation funds for state highway
improvements, intercity rail, and regional
highway and transit improvements.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Proposed fund estimate will likely be
released July 2021
Caltrans Strategic Partnerships Grants
To identify and address statewide,
interregional, or regional transportation
deficiencies on the State highway system
in partnership with Caltrans. The transit
component that will fund planning projects
that address multimodal transportation
deficiencies with a focus on transit.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Grant applications due January 2021
California Natural Resources Agency
Environmental Enhancement and
Mitigation Program
This program supports projects
that "contribute to mitigation of the
environmental effects of transportation
facilities." According to the program
guidelines, projects that fall under the
following category can apply: "Mitigation
Projects Beyond the Scope of the Lead
Agency responsible for assessing the
environmental impact of the proposed
transportation improvement."
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
2021 EEM Program Solicitation anticipated
January 2021
California Natural Resources Agency Urban
Greening Program
This program supports projects that "use
natural systems or systems that mimic
natural systems to achieve multiple
benefits." Eligible projects include "Non-
motorized urban trails that provide safe
routes for travel between residences,
workplaces, commercial centers, and
schools."
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Proposals were due July 15, 2020
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 898
FEDERAL SOURCES
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program
The Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) program is a flexible program that
provides communities with resources to
address a wide range of unique community
development needs. Communities often use
CDBG funds to construct and repair streets
and sidewalks.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Housing and Community Development
program application was due April 15, 2020
(competitive) and September 30, 2020
(OTC).
Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage
Development (BUILD) Transportation
Discretionary Grant Program
This program supports projects that are
"road or bridge projects eligible under title
23, United States Code;" and "intermodal
projects." This program replaces the TIGER
program.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
The application for FY 2020 was due May
18, 2020
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
(CMAQ) Improvement Program
The FAST Act continued the CMAQ program
to provide a flexible funding source to State
and local governments for transportation
projects and programs to help meet the
requirements of the Clean Air Act. Funding
is available to reduce congestion and
improve air quality for areas that do not
meet the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or
particulate matter (nonattainment areas)
and for former nonattainment areas that are
now in compliance (maintenance areas).
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
Funding is distributed through SCAG based
on a formula
Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP)
California's Local HSIP focuses on
infrastructure projects with nationally
recognized crash reduction factors (CRFs).
Local HSIP projects must be identified on
the basis of collision experience, collision
potential, collision rate, or other data-
supported means.
NEXT FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
HSIP Cycle 11 will start around April 2022
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 99
IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS
Implementation of the LRSP is a vital
step in the process where identified
strategies and projects are executed. To
successfully implement programs and
projects, partnerships, trust, funding
and coordination need to be proactively
managed. Successful implementation
requires sustained and coordinated support
from key stakeholders, elected officials and
City staff. Some strategies are outlined
below:
Oversight & Accountability
To ensure effective delivery of safety
project and programs, establishing a
committee or Task Force with key officials
and stakeholders (in and outside of the
City) that meets bi-annually or quarterly is
recommended. Having appointed leadership
will be a crucial part of maintaining buy-
in and support for the LRSP from not
only officials, but the community as well.
Leadership could additionally include
members from identified LRSP partners
(the Soboba Tribal Administration, SJUSD,
Sheriff’s Department, Riverside Transit
Agency, and Riverside County Public
Health Department). Holding the City’s
Community Development, Engineering, and
Public Safety Departments accountable is
crucial for effective implementation, along
with holding County departments like
the Riverside Public Health Department,
Riverside Transit Agency and Sheriff’s
Department accountable as well. Some
duties could include conducting briefings
and presentations at board and agency
meetings, collecting and sharing information
on a regular basis and updating a public-
facing database (or scorecard) on LRSP goal
progress.
Coordination & Partnership
Throughout the lifetime of the LRSP,
coordination and partnership amongst
diverse stakeholders will be essential
for effective delivery of the LRSP. Some
strategies include regularly informing
leaders and stakeholders from the Soboba
Tribal Administration, SJUSD, Sheriff’s
Department, Riverside Transit Agency, and
Riverside County Public Health Department
on progress and key milestones,
consulting partner agencies early on in
the implementation process to gather
suggestions and feedback, and finding
opportunities for partnership via project
bundling (e.g. integrating LRSP projects with
pavement resurfacing and maintenance).
Funding
One major hurdle to plan implementation is
often funding. As part of an implementation
strategy it is recommended that the
City stay up to date on potential grant
opportunities and place the most
competitive projects forward as grant
sources evolve. Additionally, reviewing an
updated list of current capital projects to
find where LRSP projects could overlap
for possible project bundling. See previous
section 8.1 Funding for more details.
Communication
Having continued communication and
transparency with stakeholders and
community members can allow for greater
trust and support of the LRSP’s goals. Some
strategies include communication across
diverse channels (e.g. updated webpage,
news, and social media), actively addressing
community concerns, publishing updating
factsheets on plan progress, and regular
public meetings using effective community
engagement techniques. An oversight
committee or Task Force (as proposed
above) could aid with leading efforts on
communication and trust-building.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
Chapter 8100
EVALUATION STRATEGIES
Evaluation identifies possible opportunities
to inform future decision-making, it will
allow the City to understand how it is
doing with regards to meeting its safety
goals. It provides the basis for determining
selection of emphasis of priority areas,
countermeasures, and locations to reduce
crashes (and the harm resulting from them).
Recommendations include:
Update the Plan Regularly
For example, scheduling an update every
two years could assist with organizing and
directing evaluation efforts. As conditions
within the City and County could change, it
will be necessary to update the LRSP in the
future.
Identify Target Metrics and Measure Goal
Performance in Priority Areas
In order to understand progress and safety
conditions, several metrics should be used
in LRSP evaluation. Examples of measuring
goal performance include:
›monitoring collision and crashes, specific
to the goals outlined in this plan
›monitoring the number of safety
infrastructure improvements installed
Additional regular measurement of goal
progress in priority areas can be performed
every year (e.g. safety scorecard). Safety
scorecards that are released annually can be
a powerful tool for measuring effectiveness,
highlighting areas that need further
attention and resources, and identifying
tasks and deadlines for responsible
stakeholder parties (e.g. the City, Sheriff’s
Department, and Riverside County Public
Health Department).
Safety scorecard examples can be found at
the following links:
https://www1.nyc.gov/content/visionzero/
pages/vision-zero-scorecard
https://roadsafetyatwork.ca/tool-kits/road-
safety-snapshot/
Continue Engagement of Stakeholders
Efforts around evaluation should include
expanding partnership from diverse
sources (e.g. officials, agencies, community
advocacy groups). Input from identified
partners (Soboba Tribal Administration,
SJUSD, Sheriff’s Department, Riverside
Transit Agency, and Riverside County Public
Health Department) and future partners,
along with collected target metrics, could be
used to adapt the plan based on community
feedback and expert insight as projects and
programs are rolled out.
Conduct pre- and post- surveys with
community members to measure how
their actions and views have shifted after
engagement around traffic safety. Local
partners can be tasked with disseminating
the pre- and post-surveys to residents.
Surveys should evaluate whether
respondents express a shift in behavior
after having participated in traffic safety
programming. The metrics for evaluation
can also be developed in partnership with
local partners to ensure accessibility
for the public.
Cawston Avenue & Via La Sierra Lane
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
San Jacinto Local Roadway Safety Plan 1014.1.b
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Final LRSP (Final LRSP Report) (Final Local Road Safety Plan)
February 2, 2021
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Stuart McKibbin, City Engineer
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Ramona Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Ramona
Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1; Award the construction contract to Universal
Construction and Engineering for $298,694.23; Allocate 10% of the bid amount for soft costs
and 10% of the bid amount for construction contingencies; reject all other bids; and authorize the
City Manager to execute the construction contract.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Ramona Expressway is the primary western entryway to the City. It connects residents and
visitors to Mt. San Jacinto College, shopping centers, residential areas, and the Soboba
Casino. Currently, travelers entering the City see a barren median from Sanderson to State
Street. While many cities have landscaped entries, staff proposes to transform the median
into something special, something no other city has --- providing a unique platform for
public art.
When Ramona Expressway was improved from Sanderson to Eagle, by way of
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Funds, the medians were created and the
installation of those median, inclu ding all funds for design, install and on -going
maintenance issues (in perpetuity) were left to the City to fund.
The City has struggled for years to creatively design and install the median in an
aesthetic way that would not use an exorbitant amount of w ater, electricity to
power the sprinkler system, or create a financial hardship on the City to continue
to maintain these long stretches of median on one of the most traveled roadways
in the City.
The City Manager brought several key staff together to con sider a new approach
– one that would not use water, electricity and would have minimal operational
and maintenance costs, and introduce a public art approach to the roadway
stretch of nearly 2.5 miles. For many years, the City Council considered the
form ation of a public art program, which was established last October 2020, and
came on the heels of the creative design of this project.
The conceptual design for the Ramona Expressway Median is a fresh approach. A team of seven
City employees assembled by the City Manager developed the idea for an attractive, functional,
4.2
Packet Pg. 209
and creative landscape median without landscaping needing water, electricity, or monthly on-
going landscape maintenance. At its heart, their idea for the median included metal art pieces in
the form of agave. The group envisioned that the agave art pieces would be highlighted by solar
lighting and be surrounded by rock and colored decomposed granite. The median would also
feature City entry monuments.
The conceptual design was approved and funding for the project was allocated by the City
Council on April 21, 2020.
(Ramona Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1 Conceptual Design)
A landscape consultant fleshed out this vision into the plans that the City Council approved on
April 21, 2020. The result has been one of the most creative landscape median designs in
Riverside County, if not the State. The staff team believes that this one-of-a-kind design will not
only brighten up the Ramona Expressway median, but the entire corridor from Lyon Avenue to
State Street and put the City of San Jacinto at the forefront of public art, water conservation, and
solar lighting.
The Ramona Expressway Median Art Project will be constructed in two phases. This first phase
will improve the medians from State Street to Lyon Avenue. Sixty agave art pieces have already
been procured by the City and upon Council approval of the contract will be installed by the
Contractor. Phase 2 would upgrade the median segment between Lyon Avenue and Sanderson
Avenue.
On December 28, 2020, the notice inviting bids was advertised online with Planet Bids and in the
Press Enterprise. On January 14, 2021, five bids were received ranging from $298,694.23 to
$945,398.10. Universal Construction and Engineering was the low bid for the sum of
$298,694.23. The bid proposal has been reviewed and found responsive and responsible. Staff
contacted the Contractor’s references, and these agencies found their work satisfactory. 60
working days are allocated to the Contractor to complete construction following the anticipated
start date of February 16, 2021.
4.2
Packet Pg. 210
The project does not use any Measure V funding. The idea and concept was designed without
the intent or idea of using the approved ballot measure funding in any way.
Funds for the project will come from two main sources. The Community Amenities Fund is
derived from developer impact fee deposits over the previous several years geared toward public
art projects, and the Gaming Funds were allocated to the City by the State based on an
application from the City to enhance the medians as a connection to the roadway leading up to
the Soboba Casino.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Ramona
Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1; Award the construction contract to Universal
Construction and Engineering for $298,694.23; Allocate 10% of the bid amount for soft costs
and 10% of the bid amount for construction contingencies; reject all other bids; and authorize the
City Manager to execute the construction contract.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is sufficient funding in the Gaming Fund and DIF: Community Amenities Fund to cover
the construction, soft costs and construction contingency.
Construction Cost: $298,694.34
Soft Cost 10%: $ 29,869.43
Contingency 10%: $ 29,869.43
Total: $358,433.21
Gaming fund (068): $ 52,397.89
DIF: Comm. Amen. (131): $306,035.32
Total: $358,433.21
ATTACHMENTS:
21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (Bid Results)
21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (Project Plans)
21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (PowerPoint Presentation)
4.2
Packet Pg. 211
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (Bid Results) (Ramona Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (Project Plans) (Ramona Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (Project Plans) (Ramona Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (Project Plans) (Ramona Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (Project Plans) (Ramona Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (Project Plans) (Ramona Expressway Median Art Project, Phase 1)
City of San Jacinto
Ramona Expressway Median Art Project
Phase 1
Engineering Department
4.2.c
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (PowerPoint Presentation)
Overview
•Ramona Expressway is a major corridor that connects
residents with many important areas in the City.
•This project will create a one of a kind entry to the City
with agave art pieces,City monuments,colored granite,
and crushed rocks in the median on Ramona Expressway.
•The project will be separated in two phases.
•Phase 1 -State Street to Lyon Avenue
•Phase 2 –Lyon Avenue to Sanderson Avenue
4.2.c
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (PowerPoint Presentation)
Sanderson AvenueState Street2nd Phase
1st Phase
4.2.c
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (PowerPoint Presentation)
Conceptual Design
We st of State Street going to Lyon Avenue (Phase 1)
4.2.c
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (PowerPoint Presentation)
Picture of Metal Agave
4.2.c
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (PowerPoint Presentation)
Project Information
•Contractor: Universal Construction and Engineering
•Bid Amount:$298,694.23
•Number of days given to complete:60
•Anticipated Start Date:February 16,2021
4.2.c
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (PowerPoint Presentation)
QUESTIONS?
4.2.c
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: 21 - 02 02 Agenda re Ramona Expressway Median Art Project (PowerPoint Presentation)