Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 12/2/2004
AGENDA ITEM 3-' 1 4 72- December 2, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager SUBJECT: Labor Negotiations for SEIU and Management RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council start to engage in a conversation about the salary increase for SEIU and management employees. BACKGROUND: As the Council is aware, early next year, we will engage in labor negotiations with SEIU and management representatives. As Council is aware, we historically have had and continue to have a problem with attraction and retention of employees within the organization because we pay at the bottom of the pay scale. Attached is a two-year old salary survey that was done when Jake Wager was here. This salary survey indicates that two years ago twelve out of the eighteen positions surveyed were 10% or more below the median salary range. Given this information, as a minimum, I wanted to recommend a 10% salary increase for all positions that are 10% or more below the average. In order to determine who is below the average by 10%, I would recommend that Council Authorize the staff to hire a consultant to conduct an up to date salary survey on all regular positions. I would also recommend another 5% across the board salary increase, so we buy back the four hours that we gave our employees off on Fridays, so that employees work a 40- hour week. As the Council will recall, the Council gave time off in lieu of a salary increase, historically. This will necessitate a minimum of a 15% salary increase for salary survey justified positions, to deal with the low salaries and the buy back of Friday afternoons. Approval City Manager: 'Finance Director: Page 1 of 3 JUSTIFICATION: Retain and attract qualified employees to the organization. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Giving the increase in sales tax and property tax, I believe the City can afford the salary increases that are being suggested. Also attached are sheets that show the break out of the 1% raise to the general fund and other funds. Also noteworthy, the Council, in open session, will be talking about a salary range for the Public Works Director. I wanted the Council to be aware of what I was planning to recommend in regards to the Finance Director and the Community Development Director. In the attached study the Finance Director is 18% below the median income and 23% below the mean salary range of comparable positions. The Community Development Director is 26% below the median salary and 23% below the mean salary. It is my hope that the council will set a competitive wage for the Public Works Director with the thought that we will also be trying to bring up the salary of our existing department heads to a competitive wage position. I believe we need to deal with this salary problem, so we can stop our retention and attraction problems in the organization. ATTACHMENTS: Salary Survey Cost Sheets Page 2 of 3 111 K�.'..fir i' ,o,,� ,,,,,,q H CITY OF SAN JACINTO Administration MEMO TO: Peter Cosentini FROM: Cindy Bohn SUBJECT: 1% General Increase DATE: October 26, 2004 CC: Bernie Simon The total cost for payroll including benefits from April 11, 2005 to April 9, 2006 is $2,400,293 for all City employees. This is one year of salary and benefits beginning with the first pay period following the S.E.I.U. contract renewal date. The cost of a one percent (1%) salary increase for all City personnel for one year commencing on April 11, 2005 would be $20,669. This includes increase in benefits as applicable. The breakdown between S.E.I.U. and Management is almost 50/50. The total cost for payroll including benefits with a 1% increase from April 11, 2005 to April 9, 2005 would be $2,420,962. The Management contract renewal is only 2 months later and there would not be a significant change in the cost of the 1% increase at that time. EFFECT OF A 1%SALARY INCREASE INCLUDING INCREASE IN BENEFITS AS APPLICABLE DISTRIBUTED BY FUND 1 YEAR AFTER COST OF FUND AS IS 1% 1% 010—General 1,502,940 1,515,788 12,848 050—Water 427,612 431,274 3,662 055—Waste Water 98,161 99,010 849 056—CSA 152 25,021 25,249 228 059—Solid Waste 20,687 20,865 178 096— RDA SJ Project 244,669 246,868 2,199 099— RDA SJ Low Mod 81,203 81,908 705 2,400,293 2,420,962 20,669 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 • Tel: 909/654-7337 Fax: 909/654-3728 I[ i'.;4"-*44*.U.k . E a f4 i MEMORANDUM i Date: September 24, 2002 To: City Council ,k= From: Jake Wager, City Mana r } Re: l ' Management Survey €; Enclosed is the recently completed Management Salary Survey. Of the eighteen positions surveyed, four positions are paid above the mean point ba sed on salary alone. Those positions are 1) Accountant (10.8%), 2) Administrative Secretary II (21.1%, 3) Administrative Assistant to the City Manager (3.4%), 4) Information Planner (16.9%). The remaining fourteen i positions are from 41.4% below the mean point (Police Chief) to 5.4% below i (Deputy City Clerk/H.R. Coordinator, Police Commander). Given the current , Police Chief vacancy and the soon-to-be vacated City Manager's position (8.0% below the mean point), the City Council may wish to look first at these two positions. From this point the City Council may wish to adopt a policy in terms of where i , does it see the position of San Jacinto amongst the ten surveyed cities. By that1 . I mean does the City wish to be at the high end of the market? The mid-point? On the bottom rung? Beyond just the salary, the City should also give some consideration to the benefit package offered. It is my opinion that the City is • very generous in granting four weeks vacation leave to management level employee upon commencement of employment. Many cities base the amount of vacation leave on a tiered years of service formula. Another point to consider is the granting of 96 hours of management leave. Again, this is a very generous 1 allowance. Do these offset lower salaries? Should the Council benchmark itself at say 90% of mean (that is 10% below the middle point) while retaining the generous leave allowance? Under that scenario, eleven salaries would be adjusted, some by as little as .6% (Administrative Secretary II), while others would be adjusted upwards by 31.4% (Police Chief). The above are merely meant to be illustrative. I believe with minor changes to certain positions coupled with limited resources, the City does offer a fair salary and benefit package. The challenge facing San Jacinto now is to retain quality employees while preserving its fiscal integrity. CITY MANAGER Summary - City Survey Data San Jancinto Job Title San Jac. Survey Survey % Diff % Diff San Jac Survey Survey % Diff % Diff Ann Sal Mean Median Mean Med Ann Pkg Pkg Mn Pkg Med Mean Med Accountant $53,076 $48,431 $47,340 8.8% 10.8% $65,045 $59,024 $58,289 9.3% 10.4% Admin Secretary II $35,088 $37,637 $38,808 -7.3% -10.6% $43,798 $47,325 $48,425 -8.1% -10.6% Admin Secretary III $49,284 $41,984 $38,880 14.8% 21.1% $60,988 $51,892 $48,552 14.9% 20.4% . - Admin Asst to City Mgr $49,284 $47,455 $47,616 3.7% 3.4% $58,988 $58,894 $58,149 0.2% 1.4% 0 0 0 0 Chief of Police $82,788 $110,352 $117,048 -33.3% -41.4/o $104,441 $131,925 $133,533 -26.3/o -27.9/o _ City Clerk $53,076 $59,432 $57,180 -12.0% -7.7% $63,045 $72,126 $73,450 -14.4% -16.5% - City Manager $105,972 $118,126 $114,400 -11.5% -8.0% $119,644 $139,425 $132,700 -16.5% -10.9% - Community Dev Dir $80,808 $89,461 $96,373 -19.3% -28.5% $86,504 $106,793 $109,419 -23.5% -26.5% Dep City Clk/ HR Coord $40,692 $41,947 $42,885 -3.1% -5.4% $49,794 $53,462 $53,133 -7.4% -6.7% Economic Dev Spec $53,184 $56,512 $57,840 -6.3% -8.8% $63,161 $67,883 $68,789 -7.5% -8.9% Finance Director $82,692 $88,787 $89,492 -18.4% -19.3% $86,504 $106,593 $102,056 -23.2% -18.0% - Fin Supv / Risk Mgt Off $49,284 $60,517 $62,472 -22.8% -26.8% $58,988 $71,778 $74,045 -21.7% -25.5% _ Information Planner $53,076 $44,106 $43,410 16.9% 18.2% $63,045 $55,326 $54,495 12.2% 13.6% _ Police Commander $75,000 $80,231 $79,035 -7.0% -5.4% $86,504 $97,135 $92,131 -12.3% -6.5% Public Works Foreman $42,504 $49,819 $50,204 -17.2% -18.1% $51,733 $60,483 $60,947 -16.9% -17.8% Redevelopment Ops Mgr $61,548 $64,975 $69,864 -5.6% -13.5% $72,110 $80,065 $83,294 -11.0% -15.5% _ Utilities Superintendent $72,800 $79,260 $79,365 -8.9% -9.0% $72,800 $94,420 $91,856 -29.7% -26.2% 0 $65,757 -18.8% -16.5% -19.3% $56,445 Water Utilities Supv $46,908 $55,968 $55,146 -17.6/o $67,057 scott10:45 AM9/24/2002 t , r Jacinto ::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::::: ::::. :a ::�:q�.f;#i• d.. dht.• ....He It ::: '':: Uiltt ictiOn::.::.::: .:::::::::::::::::. C as .. E. ::::Base.::::'':.:':�Coriip::::::: ::::Pickup:of::: ::::trisiira»ce..:'':':':�:�t3ttia........ . 1 ••.-.•.-.-.-..-. :Sal 'Coon .'Sm to Anemwm:'::. ::::Bsnefits Package ....... o.... tron :Share Pickup City of Banning Finance Coordinator $54,243 $3,797 $6,440 $64,480 City of Beaumont No Match City of Colton Accountant $45,444 $3,181 $8,240 $56,865 City of Grand Terrace No Match City of Hemet Accountant $52,428 $600 $3,670 $6,600 $63,298 City of Highland Accountant I $44,628 $3,123 $6,900 _ $54,651 City of Loma Linda Accountant $48,588 $3,401 $6,300 $58,289 City of Rialto Accountant II $46,344 $1,020 $3,244 $5,925 $56,533 City of Yucaipa No Match $59,054 Town of Yucca Valley Project Specialist $47,340 $3,314 $8,400 City of San Jacinto Accountant $53,076 $3,715 $8,254 $65,045 Mean $48,431 $59,024 Median $47,340 $58,289 from mean 8.8% 9.3% from median 10.8% 10.4% NOTES: PARITY-Accnt Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 PART `Y STUDY C•ity of;SSar Jacinto Comparison of Base Salary and Total •Compensation Package : . Deferred Retirement Health ,lunsd�ction Ciass: Base :Comp Pickup of trisurance Other : Total ::Salary: County: Employee: Premium: Benefits Package::: Contribution Share Pickup:: City of Banning Admin Secretary $37,341 $2,614 $6,102 $46,057 City of Beaumont See notes City of Colton Administrative Asst $40,056 $2,804 $8,240 $51,100 City of Grand Terrace No match City of Hemet Administrative Asst $44,220 $600 $3,095 $6,600 $54,515 City of Highland Admin Secretary $38,808 $2,717 $6,900 $48,425 City of Loma Linda Admin Secretary $40,596 $2,842 $6,300 $49,738 City of Rialto Admin Secretary $34,776 $375 $2,434 $5,857 $43,442 City of Yucaipa No match Town of Yucca Valley Office Asst II $27,664 $1,936 $8,400 $38,000 City of San Jacinto Admin Secretary II $35,088 $2,456 $6,254 $43,798 Mean $37,637 $47,325 Median $38,808 $48,425 Vo from mean -7.3% -8.1% Vo from median -10.6% -10.6% NOTES: 1. Beaumont-match was Communications Supv @$65,196,therefore not used. 2. Loma Linda-class used in all dept's as secretary to Dept Heads. PARITY-Adm Sec II Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 • ' ;PARIT:Y STUD , ` ! ` ` ` '' :. - .......... .. . .r . T ��':' n5 ac ]+Ca q .......: :: Gor�par�so►n �f Bas�'5��� � +�,, a► :.�o. pe � � :.:: g ,, r . ::Uefe red :Reti.emant. :.:fiepltF. : :::: :.:. k .. Other:::< `Total: ............ .. ... ... ase: Comp. Ptc up of Insurance:. :.... Jurisdtctioii:::..:.. :::::: ::Cfass::. :::•::::: >:.Sa1. Count .•.Em lo..ee.. . :Premi.uiii::: Benefits.... Package.:: . ......... . . .. ........ . nti ibuti 6 r ::Pi ku City of Banning Admin Secretary $37,341 $2,614 $6,102 $46,057 City of Beaumont Customer Service Coord $38,880 $3,110 $7,908 $49,898 City of Colton Exec Sec to Police Chf $43,176 $3,022 $8,240 $54,438 City of Grand Terrace No Match City of Hemet Management Asst $58,020 $600 $4,061 $6,600 $69,281 City of Highland Admin Secretary $38,808 $2,717 $6,900 $48,425 City of Loma Linda No Match City of Rialto Executive Secretary $37,056 $1,020 $2,594 $5,925 $46,595 City of Yucaipa Admin Secretary $40,609 $2,843 $5,100 $48,552 Town of Yucca Valley No Match City of San Jacinto Admin Secretary III $49,284 $3,450 $8,254 $60,988 Mean $41,984 F $51,892 Median _ $48,552 $38,880 I ► I from mean 14.8% _ 14.9% from median 21.1% _ 20.4% NOTES: 1. Colton- position not responsible for computers. 2. Hemet- position handles all PD personnel activities. 3. Highland - position not responsible for computers. PARITY-Ad Sec III Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 C, tSan ac n foI )(A:), . :.:.:.:... .... ....:.. o r •. .•... .. . .. ••• • ::.:.:::::: ::::: :::: alonof a e..S. a.: :.0n:.. T a� a ..: a .. an..gat.a.n .. ack:.a .:. :.:: .... ... . • erre� :: :R.t;r. ,e.:: ::::: .....It..: ::: :::::::::::::::::: :::: Asf.....d.. ...s.i.em..nt. ....Hsa.h.... .............. .............. :::::Base::::: :::::i:cp.iiip:>:': •P::ki:p:o_. ::.;n ur ce : „er :: :::.19 a1::::: s . p... .. .�c.0 f.. .. s an Ot.e..... .....Tote..... :::.I. n::::::: >:::::::>:;::Cie s..:: ::: : ............. ...:.......... ............... .. luris:ii�ct o.... .. Sala :::Co:unt Eployee:: .....mi_.__ : Benefits ............. ............. . ::.:::::.:::7:a c..g.....: Contribution ::::Share.,.. :: :Picku ............................ City of Banning No Match City of Beaumont Customer Service Coord $38,880 $3,110 $7,908 $49,898 City of Colton Executive Assistant $43,176 $3,022 $8,240 $54,438 City of Grand Terrace Executive Assistant $48,300 $8,742 $3,381 $3,896 $64,319 City of Hemet Administrative Asst $47,616 $600 $3,333 $6,600 $58,149 City of Highland No Match City of Loma Linda No Match City of Rialto Executive Assistant $45,240 $1,020 $3,167 $5,925 $55,352 City of Yucaipa Management Analyst $60,284 $4,220 $5,100 $69,604 Town of Yucca Valley Administrative Analyst $48,692 $3,408 $8,400 $60,500 City of San Jacinto Admin Asst to City Mgr $49,284 $3,450 $6,254 $58,988 Mean $47,455 $58,894 Median $47,616 $58,149 % from mean 3.7% 0.2% from median 3.4% 1.4% NOTES: 1. Grand Terrace-deferred comp= 18.1%of salary to offset benefits. 2.Yucaipa-deferred comp=3% match PARITY-Admin Asst,CM Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 scott1:11 PM9/16/2002 I , • ' 1 . ' • : ' .': : .ii0M.::*: N . . ..... ... ::i::: :*i:iii::ii:i::::i* l:i:i:i:::::.::i.iii:::i: nM !iiin :Hi ii::Hlti..,.: .,............:......:.„...........:::ii.:::.: PARITY slropyiiiii,i,i,l,l,i,ii,•„; ,„!,H,,i,i,i•:.•„•„i,i,i,ii,iiiH,i,i,Hii,i,iii:,i„,:,i,i,i,i„H,:,::i,i,i,•„•„i„ii„„„i, •„,,„,,:::•,:H ::,::: :,::]:H, :: ,: :-,:::.,:.,...,i,i,i:si:•::,i,,,,„„„„,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,„„,i1,:i,,•:::„,„,.:::„„„„„,,,,,,„,:„„„„„,„„,„•„m,y,,,,-„:„.1:..,1,, ,i.,i,: ,i,:: ] ,,m,::: :,:HiH!,m,:,:., ,:,:i:. .i.,:,:,:,,,•,:, .........._•___•_•••••••• •. ..•.•.•.•...•..•.:..............•_•••••••••••••••••••••••••• _ ••••••••••••••""••••• •• ••••••••• •••••••._................... _ .of . .•••••••••••••••••••• ••• • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • •• • • • • •.............-::...-....:-...::•::••••:. :.• .-••::::.::::i.,:::.:-:::.;i;ii:i:i;:•.:i:H.:..::::.::.:::.:;:::::::::: ••• : • ••Jacinto...•.........:.:.:.:.:.::, i.-:•::•:•:-•••••••••••••••••••••••••••:::::•::::•::.,::•iii:•:• :ii:ii:i..iiiii.: :::i::i.,i::::,ii• li.. , ,,,,::.;,i., ,,,,,,,,,i.,.„,„,,,,,,,„„::::,,„,„„:„„:„,:::,:::,,,,:::::.:.,.:.:,„,„„„„:„„,„„„„,„„, '''''''''''''''''':::.:''''C'''.6it'. ...:A:::"§:::::ti::::i1:::::'4136::::i4::''Sa:::14:':.:::."alid:::Totar:ConipensationiPackageiiiii::]::•:iii:i: ::•:•:iim::;;: iii _ : .p_;_i _:__.ii.• : ,.i :_....._ i.:....... _Irjr . ..i•••.::: ••:•::::.:.:,_:•::::•i•: •:::••••:•:::•••:•.•:•••.•:•.•:•::,,,:,::•:•,•••:•:::•:•:•: ::••::::::::::::::::::::::•:::•:•:•:• 1 •••••••-•••••• • •••••••••••••••••:•:•:•:•::•:•:•:•:•:•:::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ...::. iii:.:-..: ::.,.,4•04.#0 ..A... :::::::::" 0 ................:.......................... ::::....:.......:...:::....: ::::::::::::::.::::•::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::::: :::.,::::: •:•:•:::::: : ,::::.,::::::::: *1jii,:,-..iii: : :.i;.,. .,:io,.: 4.:..::::::::::::i.j*.o... ::::.::::::taii ::::i ..:•:.:.:•:.:.:•••••••••••••,.:;• ,,.•••;••••••:•:::•:•:•::::•:•:•:•:•.•.•:-:::::•:.::,..4•:•:-:•:::::::::::: ........... ...:....:.:.py,e ::.:.: .:::.........0,..,.1”r................._.... ._.r........ ...77........7..............i.::::........iiiiiii ::::::::::. . ::. .....:.:.:jiiiitufG00::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::: :::.s!!AW:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :: .::-:.:saiii...::::::::::::•diiiiiity:. ::::Eityor,v.0.0:i: ..::prorilmim.::::.:::.....0 Package.......:.::.... .............:.:.: .:::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::•••:.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:::::•:•:•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.......:.:................::::::::: Contribution ............isparc,::::::.. :..:.f,;c ...e.x.................... .......................................,. ...............................,.. .........,.......,,........., •••••••••••••••••• •• " City of Banning Chief of Police $105,347 $7,374 $9,569 $122,290 City of Beaumont Chief of Police $84,420 $7,598 $7,908 $99,926 City of Colton Police Chief $117,096 $8,197 $8,240 $133,533 City of Grand Terrace No Match City of Hemet Chief of Police $127,848 $3,157 $11,506 $12,775 $4,800 $160,086 City of Highland No Match City of Loma Linda No Match City of Rialto Police Chief $117,048 $5,852 $10,534 $5,555 $4,800 $143,789 City of Yucaipa No Match Town of Yucca Valley No Match City of San Jacinto Chief of Police $82,788 4 $15,399 $6,254 $104,441 Mean $110,352 $131,925 Median $117,048 $133,533 I % from mean -33.3% -26.3% °A from median -41.4% -27.9% NOTES: PARITY-Chf Pol Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 . , , PARITY STUDY i nJa- G t of'Sa ci�nf+a Y. . Gnm arison; of Base Sal .a anci Total Cam �nsa�[on; . age �+��. Deferred. Retirement ...Health::. Base :Comp Pickupof Insurance .:Other::: :Total Junsd4ction Class Sala Count Employee . Premium .:Benefits Packa e .. ry: Y : P Y .. 5 . .- Con tribution Stiare.' Pickup: City of Banning City Clerk/Exec Asst $42,294 $2,961 $6,201 $300 $51,756 City of Beaumont Elected City of Colton City Clerk $53,580 $3,751 $8,240 $65,571 City of Grand Terrace City Clerk $57,180 $10,349 $4,003 $3,896 $75,428 City of Hemet Deputy City Clerk $48,804 $600 $3,416 $6,600 $59,420 City of Highland City Clerk $62,196 $4,354 $6,900 $73,450 City of Loma Linda City Clerk $77,640 $5,434 $6,300 $89,374 City of Rialto City Clerk/Mgmt Svcs Dir $71,244 $3,562 $4,987 $5,555 $4,800 $90,148 City of Yucaipa City Clerk/Rent Admin $68,206 $4,774 $5,100 $78,080 Town of Yucca Valley Town Clerk $53,748 $3,762 $8,400 $65,910 City of San Jacinto City Clerk $53,076 - A. $3,715 $6,254 $63,045 Mean $59,432 $72,126 Median $57,180 $73,450 % from mean -12.0% -14.4% from median -7.7% -16.5% NOTES: 1. Grand Terrace-deferred comp= 18.1%of salary to offset benefits. 2. Loma Linda-also administers Redevelopment/City Housing prpgrams. PARITY-City Clk Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 • 1 r PARIT:��:::ST•' • D'1�`::::::::::: :'::::: .. :::..::::::::::::::::::::::: t::i•i:'•'•'i'•iiiii:••i••••'ii°'''•••••••••. . 'i•iii••i••.iji;'''iii:i :•:•:•:•.•.•... ••••••••••••ii••••i•••:•ii••i•:•iii•ii[i :::::::::::::•...•..........•.........................• ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::• :::::::::::::::::::::::::: :an Jacinto :::::: ::n . : k .::::::: ::.:::: ::::: :::: n , • ►x� of B .a a a n ait;T 1 :. :: .: r tto a .. ... ........:' ••.• alt:.: .:.:.::.:::::::::::::.:::::::.. .. ................... . ' ,,.. ... .:. Deferred.. 'R0tirOment. .':Hey.h..... .. Base':.'..' :...Comp:::..: ..Pickup:of,::: :::::Insurance Other.: ::.: •::Total.: :: : Gass ......:..:. .:. :Jurisdiction:: .•.�::�::':':•:'.::':�:�:.. • :.:.: .•.•.•.:.:.:. '•':•':•' :'• • S•alary. • :•C•o•:•u•nt•y • ::::Em•ployee'• •••.Premium:':':'•':':':Benefits :Package:::: Contribution •Share : Pickup <•'':::::.'.. .: ::::::•:::. 2c/ ' City of Banning City Manager $114,046 $7,983 $9,917 $131,946 City of Beaumont On Contract ,ot, . City of Colton City Manager $120,000 $8,400 $8,540 $136,940 uo Uf.,, 11/)..,, City of Grand Terrace City Manager $100,800 $18,245 $7,056 $3,896 $3,860 $133,857 City of Hemet City Manager $148,452 $3,569 $10,392 $12,775 $4,800 $179,988 City of Highland City Manager $ 6 $5,450 $6,900 $90,206 P,;,, -r City of Loma Linda City Manager $114,400 $8,008 $6,300 $128,708 City of Rialto City Administrator $160,152 $8,008 $11,211 $5,555 $4,800 $189,726 tl* 'Do' �loPe \ City of Yucaipa City Manager $117,430 $8,220 $5,100 $130,750 21 t'1a=aj Town of Yucca Valley Town Manager $110,000 $7,700 $8,400 $6,600 $132,700 City of San Jacinto City Manager $105,972 $7,418 $6,254 $119,644 1i Mean $118,126 $139,425 Median $114,400 $132,700 1 % from mean -11.5% -16.5% from median -8.0% -10.9% NOTES: 1. Grand Terrace-defered comp= 18.1%of salary to offset benefits. PARITY-City mgr Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 PARITY STUDY City of San Jacinto Comparison of Base Salary and Total Compensation Package Deferred Retirement Health Jurisdiction Class Base Comp Pickup of Insurance Other Total Salary County Employee Premium Benefits Package Contribution Share Pickup City of Banning Community Dev Dir $85,104 $5,957 $7,057 $2,400 $100,518 City of Beaumont On contract City of Colton Community Dev Dir $101,076 $7,075 $8,240 $116,391 City of Grand Terrace Community Dev Dir $73,212 $13,251 $5,125 $3,896 $3,860 $99,344 City of Hemet Planning Director $99,876 $2,598 $6,991 $12,775 $122,240 City of Highland Community Dev Dir $103,872 $7,271 $6,900 $2,400 $120,443 City of Loma Linda Community Dev Dir $88,836 $6,219 $6,300 $101,355 City of Rialto Dir of Development Svcs $97,812 $4,891 $6,847 $5,555 $4,800 $119,905 City of Yucaipa Community Dev Dir $96,373 $6,746 $5,100 $1,200 $109,419 Town of Yucca Valley Planning Manager $58,989 $4,129 $8,400 $71,518 City of San Jacinto Community Dev Dir $80,808 $5,656 $6,254 $92,718 Mean $89,461 $106,793 Median $96,373 $109,419 I % from mean -10.7% -15.2% % from median -19.3% -18.0% NOTES: 1. Grand Terrace-deferred comp = 18.1% of salary to offset benefits. PARITY-Com Dev Dir Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/23/2002 r iPARITY . . �► Sar Ctrri arson.of. s [a..:. . and Tatal Com .ei` sabot Package R .t`r e .......:... ,:.......:... ...:.. ... :. ...: ;:�: 'Dt}f...rad:. ...a ri em .nt. :... Total Junsdtctibn Class; Base l omR..: . Pickup of:. Insurance . .:. ©the.: . :.::.: .:.;:.Salary County Employee.? ::.Premiurri::: < :Benefits: Package `n citiition : Shace>::: :� Pickii ........... City of Banning See notes City of Beaumont Deputy City Clerk $38,880 $3,110 $7,908 $49,898 City of Colton Dep City Clerk $43,344 $3,034 $8,240 $54,618 City of Grand Terrace Deputy City Clerk $42,888 $7,762 $3,002 $3,896 $57,548 City of Hemet No Match City of Highland No Match City of Loma Linda Per.Asst/Asst to City Clerk $43,752 $3,063 $6,300 $53,115 City of Rialto See notes City of Yucaipa No Match Town of Yucca Valley Deputy Town Clerk $40,872 $2,861 $8,400 $52,133 City of San Jacinto Dep City Clerk/HR Coord $40,692 $2,848 $6,254 $49,794 Mean $41,947 $53,462 Median $42,888 $53,115 % from mean -3.1% 7.4% from median -5.4% -6.7% NOTES: 1. Banning- match was Human Resources Mgr @ 68,104-,therefore not used. 2. Beaumont-class performs Deputy City Clerk functions only. 3. Grand Terrace-deferred comp= 18.1%of salary to offset benefits. 4. Loma Linda-position not responsible for recording Council/Redevelopment Agency proceedings. 5. Rialto- match was Human Resources Director @ $97,812- , therefore not used. PARITY-DepCC,HR Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 > r •••• •• :PARITY STUDY :I` :: ' '. '' :::::::::::::::::: • • •• •• • J ................................................. i : �� o� San::.Ja��nt+� :: Y e ::. .. . . . ..:... .....:. . . ... '' �� ��-���►r�:�f. Base Sala and Ta►t�[::�caMrt er� ��h�: lac a s ...s. ......B...a...e......:..... D::oerrd:.:.: :,.F.4." m.�.n..t. . :.. e h.: :::::: :::::::::aT: ota I :::: :_ Goi� '`Pickup of: insurance Otar. :.::C ;,. s . p ; poee Freniiun : Benefits :: .:.?: ckag ::Jundtction las Salary : County.:. :.:Emly . .,.......... . .. Contribution ` hare Pickup:.. City of Banning No Match City of Beaumont No Match — City of Colton No Match City of Grand Terrace No Match City of Hemet See notes - City of Highland Economic Dev Spec $57,840 $4,049 $6,900 $68,789 City of Loma Linda No Match City of Rialto Economic Dev Mgr $63,696 $1,020 $4,459 $5,925 $75,100 City Yucaipa Yucai a No Match Town of Yucca Valley Economic Dev Mgr $48,000 $3,360 $8,400 $59,760 City of San Jacinto Economic Dev Spec $53,184 $3,723 $6,254 $63,161 Mean $56,512 $67,883 Median $57,840 $68,789 from mean -6.3% -7.5% from median -8.8% -8.9% NOTES: 1. Hemet- match was Principal Planner @$86,124-,therefore not used. 2. Highland-position aslo acts as Redevelopment Operations Manager. PARITY-Ec Dev Spc Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 PARITY STUDY City of San Jacinto Comparison of Base Salary and Total Compensation Package Deferred Retirement Health Jurisdiction Class Base Comp Pickup of Insurance Other Total Salary County Employee Premium Benefits Package Contribution Share Pickup City of Banning Finance Director $94,886 $6,642 $9,150 $2,400 $113,078 City of Beaumont On contract City of Colton Finance Director $101,472 $7,103 $8,240 $116,815 City of Grand Terrace Finance Director $73,212 $13,251 $5,125 $3,896 $3,860 $99,344 City of Hemet Finance Director $110,244 $2,805 $7,717 $12,775 $4,800 $138,341 City of Highland Finance Officer $77,856 $5,450 $6,900 $90,206 City of Loma Linda Finance Dir/Treasurer $88,836 $6,219 $6,300 $101,355 City of Rialto Chief Financial Officer $97,812 $4,891 $6,847 $5,555 $4,800 $119,905 City of Yucaipa Admin Services Officer $89,492 $6,264 $5,100 $1,200 $102,056 Town of Yucca Valley Finance Director $65,270 $4,569 $8,400 $78,239 - City of San Jacinto Finance Director $82,692 $5,788 $6,254 $94,734 Mean $88,787 $106,593 Median $89,492 $102,056 % from mean -7.4% -12.5% % from median -8.2% -7.7% NOTES: 1 Grand Terrace- deferred comp= 18.1%of salary to offset benefits. 2. Highland - position has no Risk Management responsibilities. PARITY-Fin Dir 9-23-02 Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/24/2002 i City:of •San Jacint• o r : 8 I ` :.rt;R ka: a 0o a .�son:.of ase:.�a an+� T�ta[ ��rr� ensa io ac . •: ..:..:. . .. • I� igHlilHHIHHiii ............................................................ ............... .............. .............. ................................ .............. ............................ ............................... .............. .............. ..... ... ..... ................ . ............................ erred :::: : R.t.... .e.t It D ........ ...e.irem..nt. .... ea. O.her::::. .....::`: ` I:;::::::: ease:::: ::::..:o „�...:o.: :: surance: .:: ::Ot.e..... .....Tote..... Jurisdhction Class: .0 mp•:•:: f'tc.u . f.. ..ln. ::. : Salafy:': County Employee Premium... .::Benefits :: .Package:: Contribution : ::Share.::: Picku.:::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::.::::;:::::; .. P City of Banning Financial Coordinator $54,243 $3,797 _ $6,440 $64,480 City of Beaumont On contract City of Colton Sr.Accountant $50,832 $3,558 $8,240 $62,630 City of Grand Terrace No Match City of Hemet Sr.Accountant $62,472 $600 $4,373 $6,600 $74,045 City of Highland No Match City of Loma Linda Accounting Mgr $66,516 $4,656 $6,300 $77,472 City of Rialto Acct&Budget Mgr $68,520 $1,020 $4,796 $5,925 $80,261 City of Yucaipa No Match Town of Yucca Valley No Match City of San Jacinto Fin Spv/Risk Mgmt Off $49,284 $3,450 $6,254 $58,988 Mean $60,517 $71,778 Median $62,472 $74,045 1 % from mean -22.8% —I -21.7% % from median -26.8% -25.5% NOTES: 1. Banning -position has no Risk Management responsibilities. 2. Colton-position has no Risk Management responsibilities. 3. Hemet-position has no Risk Management responsibilities. 4. Loma Linda-position has no Risk Management responsibilities. PARITY-Fin Spv,Risk Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 Ry.��I Y SCTk DY ...it. . f ..anJac' Ba :::::::.::::::::::::: :Cram ari c�n..ofBase.Sala .:: r�c� T�. �►[.Cott : r��a � r� Pac�a. a . .. .. ... ............................................................ ............... .............. .............. ................................ .............. ............................ ............................... .............. .............. ............... ................ .............................. ............................................................ ............... .. et R.tire. .e..:: ::::. . I :....................... .............. ... red:. ...e.irem..nt. ....Hed tFt.:.:: :::::::::::: :: ::::::::::::: a: tct Q .. ...Ciass:�::..:: :. • • •• •• ::.:Sat . :::Coun :Em loye:: :::Preiniuni::: :::Benefits::::•::Package:: ..... ... .... ................................ .......................... ............................... ..............• .............. ............... ................ .............................. Contribution :•:•::'Share:•:•:•: ::•:•::Picku0::::> ::.:::.:::.:.:::. .; :,.::::::::::: City of Banning No Match City of Beaumont On contract City of Colton Planning Assistant $45,552 $3,189 $8,240 $56,981 City of Grand Terrace Planning Tech $38,460 $6,961 $2,692 $3,896 $52,009 City of Hemet GIS/Graphics Coord $51,144 $600 $3,580 $6,600 $61,924 City of Highland No Match City of Loma Linda No Match City of Rialto Planning Tech $41,268 $375 $2,889 $5,857 $50,389 City of Yucaipa No Match Town of Yucca Valley No Match City of San Jacinto Information Planner $53,076 $3,715 $6,254 $63,045 Mean $44,106 $55,326 Median $43,410 $54,495 1 _ % from mean 16.9% 12.2% from median 18.2% 13.6% NOTES: 1. Grand Terrace-deferred comp= 18.1%of salary to offset benefits. 2. Colton- position has no Web Page responsibility. 3. Hemet- position reports to Information Services Manager. PARITY-Info Plnr Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 . , ' . ... ' . .......................:.,......,.,.,... i i i "-iiiiIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i iiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii::::::::iiii iii:::::.••••••••iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:::::iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:iii PARITY oIIIIIII•i]..;.....:i. ..i.......... ....ii.i.:::.:i.::.::: :.i::....ii•:::::..::: ::::.::::.::::.:-::,.„i:,:i,:-::-:::,.::::...,.-::•::.......i.:::.......:i•-•:::-..iiii.: ::•::•:.: '.::::.:..i.:.•:::•.::::::::::••••:•••!]•iiiiHH...i...:stiihi.ii::.::::::-:::m im....:.::iii.....,.i.i4.,..::: ::i..ii. ,•:.::: :,:im.i: liuux:ii:i.::•::.:ii.:......:::..:-::::::ii::::.•::.•:::::::.::.........]...::::.:•:::.......:.,:,:, :,,,...:••.,.,.........-......:.::.:..::::•::::::.i.:•::: :....]...]:.•:....„..:::.::::.: •:::::•••i:•••::::.:i....::....::::::::::.:iiii:iii...;::::i:]ii:-....:..:.,:.:::::....:.,.....i::.:::-:,...,;,.:1:,•i.i.:iiii.::•::.....::: :ii: :: :: :::i.:..i:...:................i..ii.:::::............ ..:...........:i...........,.. :•:::.:.m..............].....,-:......... .........,................ ::::: ::::;:ii.i....ii.iii.::::: ::..:iii.:::...mi.:.: :m .-..... ft •••••••••••••••••••••••.•.•.•.......• ....................................... . . . .. . . . . ......................... . . ................ ..,...... •••••••••••••••• •••••••• •• ••••••• ••••••••••••• ••••••• • . ............. ................................................... .. . .;i-::::.:...;:;:i;ii:.:i.:•:::::::::: ::;:;::•••••••••.. ...:::.:::::.........iii Jacinto........::,.... .:::•::.::.:::::::.i..-:::..:i....:-..i-:::::: ::::.:....:.......:..,.,::..::: : :.H.::: :::,,,... ...: .:iii:ii.:•:::.mi:::::•:::::.::,,,,,,,:::::::::::,..,....•••.:•......:::::::::::::::...........::::::::::::::: ':::'''':':"''''::::::::'"'"'""'"'"""""""""""'"'"''''''''''fttn':::k.:6H:'Saiaty:and:To.. . t: .,.. m en. ation•Packa. e.:•:....:•::::::::::.......:•:.::: oi...iiiiiiiiiii.......... : (71.,.i.i.mellson.i.:0 ........ ....__::i.• : :.: ::: .: i::: . .:. :::. ..:....i. •::..........:::::::•:.:•.....,...:•:::.:::.:::.......•.:.:•:::•:•:•:• -.•:••••:•,....,••••••••••:•-••••••• ............................ y!.pt .. i .......--.......-•••••-.•..••••••••••••• •••••••••••••.•.•.•.•.•.•.•..•.•.•.•.............. ......................... .... .. .. ... .Retirement......Deferred ... . ,.. ... , ..... ,..................... . .. . . ....... Base Comp Ptckup of Insurance Other Total ...................••-••.-.:.••-•••••••••••••-......• •:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:.:.:.•Clat6,-:.:.:::.:.:.:.:-:-....- ••••••••••-:-.•:.:.:.:.:.:.: ...-...,............-.-.... ••:. ....•'..Employee. .:. Premium Benefits Package ••••••••••••••••jtihS:diCtitri:•:-..........:......-•-..............• •••••...........••••••••••••••:. Salary County:.:•:-!....ounty....- .-.• ....- ••• • ,.•••-•••..:•:.:••:•••••••••••••••..:•:.:•;.....................••••••••:.: •:•••••••:::::::K:i:::.:::::::::::::::::::::::.::-:•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:*.:.:.:.:.:.:.r.:-:.:::.:.:•: ....:::..:•:.:.:.:...--..:::.::: Contribution :•:.::::Srlare-:.:•:-: :.:.:...:FIckup:::::::...........:::::....:.:..........:.:.::.:......................:... ., ...... .....••••••••••••••••••••••-•-•-•:•:•:•:•:.......:.:-:-..-•••.•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::••••••••••••:•:•••••••:•:•:::•:::: :::•:-::.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:::.._••••••••••••••••••.••••••• ..--- ,,. .,., -.•••••••••• •••• • •.•.•.•.•.•.•..•....•.•.•.-.•..•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•....•............•.•...•.•..•.„•.•....... . .. .............................. ...... ................. City of Banning Police Commander $77,154 $5,401 $6,898 $89,453 • City of Beaumont No Match City of Colton Police Sergeant $72,576 $5,080 $8,240 $85,896 City of Grand Terrace No Match City of Hemet Police Lieutenant $90,276 $2,405 $8,125 $12,775 $4,800 $118,381. City of Highland No Match City of Loma Linda No Match City of Rialto Police Lieutenant $80,916 $7,282 $5,611 $1,000 $94,809 • City of Yucaipa No Match Town of Yucca Valley No Match City of Sari Jacinto Police Commander $75,000 $5,250 $6,254 $86,504 $80,231 $97,135 Mean $79,035 $92,131 Median from mean -12.3% -7.0°A'Yo % from median _ -5.4% -6.5% NOTES: PARITY-Pot Cmdr Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 I . , ,• ' 1 ,, ' • '' ''''''''''''''''"'.."''''''''''',',•.•.',:•,',•:'',::':"•:', :•:••:•-,-:--••:::::: :::, : :::: :::',: : ::.:.,,,.:.:.,.,.,.,.:.,.,::,:,,,,:::.:,:,::: iii ii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii•iiiiiii :::::::i::i:::I:::::i::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i;iii••••••••••••••••• -•••:•:•:•:•:•::•:•:...........:.:.:.::: ::::::::::::„,:„,:::::::::::.:.............,.:.,...:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:::::::.:.:.:...:.:...:..H.,.,.,.:., s]iiiiiiimiiii.i.,iiionim Hr...:.:i•- ., i.l.ii.,,H : ; ] ii':aiHii':i.iHH,: HH PARITY ::::::::::::::::::::::::::,:::::::::::::::::::::::•::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::,,,,,:,:,,,,,::.,::.,,,„.,::::,,,::::::...:......... ..,:.....,.. ....:.:.::::.. --............... - """. -- -".•••••••• , , , ,.. ••••••••••„,.••••••••••,,H.••,„. •.••.•:•:•...::::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::::::,:::::::::::,::: :::::::,:::,,,:,:::::::::::,:::::::::,::::::::::,,, ii:iiiimiiiiiiiiiiIiiiiiijooi::i!ii iii!.,•p:! H ;l !HiiHH!': City Q.ribatvJacinto H: ' , , ,, '''H,; ''':::•": . - :,,Hin;ii;iniH :Hi.i.,..:.iii,H;;: :,,, ,:i i. i.-ii ,:.:.,..•.:.:.,..•.,..•..•.:.:.:.:.:.:. . . '"Coliiriati§ititttifaaseSalarrandiTtitaliCOnapensationiPackagemiiHHHHiliilii ...................................... ...... .... ................. ::::04.(eititit::: ::1404,00.70-it:: ::::::::Hoti :::::::::::::::.......:.:...........:.:::::: ...::::::.:.::•.:....:::. ::::::::::::::::::: :::::::.::::::::::::K::•::: ::: ::•:.:: :H.,.;';;;--:.::: :K: ::::::•:- :::::itaiii::.:::::: ::::::COMO::::::: i:::OtOk00.:Of::: :::::iliUranCli::::::::::::Otb 0.H:i : :•-17 Ota : : •:•:•:•:•:•:•:•JttritiltCtiOrii:::::•:•:•:-: •:•:•:::-:::•:::::::•::::ya**::::::::•:•:•::::::::::: :::::-:•-•-:•••:•:•:•:•:-:•: ::-:-:•••••:•:•:-:•-•:•:•:•: -:•:•••.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.....: ::: :-:•:•:•.•:•:•:•:::: :::......•.•.•........•.:.:. :.:.:,.....-.............•.: ..-.........-.-.....-...-...-.............-.-.-.....%%".-................................................ ........Salary. ........ •••••••••••••••••-•----•••••••• ••••••••••:•••:•••••••••••••••••••-••••••••:•:•:••••••••••• ••••••• •-•:•:. ••:-:•County::::. :•:•Employea.:. Premium Benefits ::::rapkage::.•. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::: ":::::.:::.:.:H.;:::::::.:.:.:.:.:.:•:•:.:.:::.:::•:.:::::.: :::::::: .III::::: iiiribtittOri ::I::::Sriaref::: :: ::::::::PiCkiiii:::::::::I:I:I: : : :::::::::: : : : : ............................ ....... .... . ., . .._ , ,.. .••••••••••••••••••-•••••••• ••••••• •-• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-• - ...... ...... .... ,............ ..,.......... .............,,..,.,...... ........ ,... •..•.•.•.-.•.-.-.-.-.•.-.•...........•................. ..........................................-... ... . ... ... ............. _ City of Banning No Match City of Beaumont Public Works Suptd $44,424 $3,554_ $7,908 $55,886 City of Colton Public Services Supvr $53,400 $3,738 $8,240 $65,378 City of Grand Terrace No Match City of Hemet No Match City of Highland Maintenance Supvr $42,144 $2,950 $6,900 $51,994 City of Loma Linda Field Services supvr $51,072 $3,575 $6,300 $60,947 City of Rialto Public Works Supvr $48,672 $1,020 $3,407 $5,925 $59,024 City of Yucaipa Street Suptd $58,814 $4,117 $5,100 $68,031 Town of Yucca Valley Public Works Ops Mgr $50,204 $3,514 $8,400 $62,118 City of San Jacinto Public Works Foreman $42,504 $2,975 $6,254 $51,733 Mean $49,819 $60,483 Median $50,204 $60,947 .__ % from mean -17.2% -16.9% _.. % from median -18.1% -17.8% NOTES: 1. Banning - position also has City Water Co. oversight. 2. Colton -Water/Waste Dept. responsible for storm drains and sewer maintenance. - Parks Dept. responsible for park maintenance. PARITY-PW Frm Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 :::::::::P.AR17::t i" D:: ::::::::::: : ::: :: :: :: ::::::::':::: ::::::::::::':: :::::::i.::::: ::::::::::::'::::' : :: ::::: :C•it i of:San Jacinto :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: i n ::fBas .Sa a . 1 m r rt.Pac etie'.:.: :;:R...f....e._.A; alth:: t � . Daf ...d e t.erh nt :.:.:::::Health::::::.:-.�..:: .'::.:: -:...: ......... ................ .`h'r ' A T to . '''.'.'''.'.'.''' '''.''''''''' Base>;'> ::::>ComplA;::��;;Picliu :of:: ;;Insurance :A> ::::Qt e.... o.... .. :::iurisdiction:A: :A: ::Class:::::::::::::::: :A •:::•::p A•::•: : •: :':::Sala :::Count :•:•Em loyee:•: Fnemi.um::': : Benefits::: ::Package.:.:: ............................... . ......... ............................ . ............................. ....... . .. . .. . .............. ............... ................ ............. . ............... t . .. n ution ace : .ic up:: City of Banning Econ Dev/Redev Mgr $70,851 $4,960 $6,772 $2,400 $84,983 City of Beaumont On contract City of Colton Redevelopment Proj Mgr $69,864 $4,890 $8,540 $83,294 City of Grand Terrace No Match City of Hemet Housing/Code Enf Mgr $76,116 $2,122 $5,328 $12,775 $4,800 $101,141 City of Highland Economic Dev Spec $57,840 $4,049 $6,900 $68,789 City of Loma Linda No Match City of Rialto See notes City of Yucaipa No Match Town of Yucca Valley Public Works Ops Mgr $50,204 $3,514 $8,400 $62,118 Y City of San Jacinto Redevelopment Ops Mgr $61,548 $4,308 $6,254 $72,110 Mean $64,975 r $80,065 Median $69,864 $83,294 7 1 from mean -5.6% -11.0% Vo from median -13.5% -15.5% NOTES: 1. Colton- Block Grant Program administered by Community Develoment Dir. 2. Rialto- match was Dir of Redevelopment/Economic Dev @$114,984,therefore not used. PARITY-Redev Ops Mgr Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 r STUDY f an Jacr f a S rtti�a Cor parisc n of Base Sa a m n too kage .... :::Deferred Retlrerrient Heelth. ::Jurisdiction Class. . Base: Comp: Pickup of insurance Totai S Employee cRa�e.Go I'remiutri.': ; .Benefits. F.a Contribution Share :•Pickup City of Banning Public Works Suprtd $78,435 $5,490 $6,924 $90,849 City of Beaumont No Match _ City of Colton See notes City of Grand Terrace No Match City of Hemet Water/Wastewater Suprtd $79,980 $2,200 $5,599 $12,775 $100,554 City of Highland No Match City of Loma Linda No Match City of Rialto Water Superintendent $79,356 $1,020 $5,555 $5,925 $91,856 City of Yucaipa No Match Town of Yucca Valley No Match City of San Jacinto Utilities Superintendent $72,800 $72,800 Mean $79,257 $94,420 Median $79,356 $91,856 Vo from mean -8.9% -29.7% % from median -9.0% -26.2% NOTES: 1. Grand Terrace-deferred comp= 18.1%of salary to offset benefits. 2. Colton-match was Dir of Waste/Wastewater Ops @$99,996 therefore not used. PARITY-Utl Suprtd Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 scott1:09 PM9/16/2002 • f WaNgaINElla ME Nag B5Wfina CityCiti(e41154i6ALNialit6 Ink ' :::;:;.:: i ::;: ,.:;':;.,:::::::.:.:.:.:::i :::.:::.::.:.:: O B l a ro � it r '''r ' `k Corgi asp:�a a �► .Co �a a a a e. ........ .... :::::::::::::::.:.::: ::::::::::::::::::: _. . p p g afofre :R. it .... Itl#. ............................................................ ............... .............. .. ... ... .................... ..... ....... .............. Base : ' Com ,.kup o • n:.::::>:::.»:::::.:.:::::Gass: :�::�:�: »:: :.::. >. :::: :::: :: ::......... ..: �........... .... ............................................................ ...... ............................ ............................... .............. .............. ............... ................ .............................. ntnhution ::::Space ... ....Picku ............ .............. City of Banning No Match City of Beaumont No Match City of Colton Water Utilities Supv $59,928 $4,195 $8,240 $72,363 City of Grand Terrace No Match City of Hemet Water/Waste Water Suptd $53,868 $600 $3,771 $6,600 $64,839 City of Highland No Match City of Loma Linda Utilities Services Supv $56,424 $3,950 $6,300 $66,674 City of Rialto Utility Ops Supv $53,652 $1,020 $3,756 $5,925 $64,353 City of Yucaipa No Match Town of Yucca Valley No Match City of San Jacinto Water Utilities Supv $46,908 $3,283 $6,254 $56,445 Mean $55,968 $67,057 Median $55,146 $65,757 % from mean -19.3% -18.8% % from median -17.6% -16.5% NOTES: PARITY-Wtr Utl Supv Prepared by HR Comp Unit 9/16/2002 • CITY of SAN JACINTO INTERNAL PARITY MATRIX City Manager $105,972 Chief of Police $82,788 10.4% Finance Director Police Commander Comm. Dev Dir. $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 100.0^/0 21.9% Utilities Suprtd $72,800 Redev. Ops Mgr 41.3% $61,548 15..7". Econ.Dev. Spec $53,184 Accountant City Clerk Info. Planner 55.2% $53,076 $53,076 $53,076 7.7% 7.7% Fin.Sup/Risk Mgt Off Admin Asst to C.M. $49,284 $49,284 Admin. Sec. III $49,284 Water Utl. Supv. $46,908 21.1% 10.4% Pub. Wrks Foreman $42,504 Dep.C.C./HR Coord $40,692 16.0% Admin Sec II $35,088 scott2:27 PM9/16/2002 BENEFITS SUMMARY BANNING: Health: $5355 +2% of salary; medical, dental, vision $5355 +4% of salary for Chief of Police, City Manager, Finance Director Retirement: 7% of salary; 2.5% © 55, SHY;Safety employees pay additional 1%. Car Allow: $200/mo - Community Dev Dir, Finance Dir, Econ Dev/Redev Mgr, HR Mgr, Asst Dir Pub Work, Elec.Utl. Ops Mgr, Utl Customer Svc Mgr, Asst Dir Elec Utl, Power Supv. $25/mo- City Clerk Car Provided -City Manager, Chief of Police Note: Next increase effective July 1, 2003 using the CPI as of April, 2003 for the Riverside County area. Increase also applies to cafeteria benefits. BEAUMONT: Health: $659/mo. Retirement: 8% of salary- misc employees, 3% @ 60 9% of salary-Safety employees, 2% @ 55 Car Allow: Car provided - Chief of Police Defrd Comp: 5% of salary; Sergeants, police COLTON: Health: $700/mo- Executive; medical, dental $675/mo- Mid Management; medical, dental Vision -$140/yr Retirement: 7% of salary; 2% @ 55, SHY GRAND TERRACE: Health: $324.70/mo (max)-age indexed; medical Retirement: 7% of salary; Allowances: Car- $300/mo - Director& above Cell phone - $10/pay period ( 26 pay periods) Defrd Comp: 18.1% of salary, to offset benefit costs. scott1:16 PM9/1 6/2002 BENEFITS SUMMARY HEMET: Health: $1064.55/mo - Management; medical, dental, vision $550/mo -Admin; medical, dental, vision Retirement: 7% of salary- misc employees; 2% @ 55 9% of salary- safety employees; 3% @ 50 Car Allow: $400/mo- Director&above Defrd Comp: 2% of salary+ $50/mo- Management $50/mo-Admin HIGHLAND: Health: $575/mo-cafeteria plan Retirement: 7% of salary; 2% @ 55 Car Allow: $200/mo; City Engineer, Community Dev Mdir LOMA LINDA: Health: $525/mo; medical, dental, vision Retirement: 7% of salary; general; 2% @ 55 6% of salary; safety, employee picks up 2%; 2% @ 50 Car Allow: Car provided -City Manager, Pub Works Dir, Dir Safety/ Fire Chief RIALTO: Mid Mgmt Health: $493.79/mo; Cafeteria- medical, dental, life insurance Retirement: 7% of salary; 2% © 55 Defrd Comp: $85/mo CGMA Health: $338.11/mo Vision: $300/yr Dental: $99.82/mo. (max) Retirement 7% of salary; General; 2% @ 55- see MOU for out years 9% of salary; Safety; 2% @ 50 - see MOU for out years Defrd Comp: 5% of salary Car Allow: $400/mo General Health: $488.09/mo; medical, life ins, dental, income protection Retirement: 7% of salary; 2% @ 55 Defrd Comp: $31.29/mo Police Mgmt Health: $440.60/mo; Dental: $27/mo Retirement: 9% of salary; 2% @ 50 ( CHP plan ) Uniform: $1000/yr; Lieutenants, Sergeants scott1:16 PM9/16/2002 1 BENEFITS SUMMARY YUCAIPA: Health: $425/mo; management, supervisory, confidential $480/mo; represented employees Retirement: 7% of salary; 2% @ 55 Car Allow: $100/mo; Dept Heads &above Car provided - City Manager Defrd Comp: 3%of salary matched Health: $700/mo Retirement: 7% of salary; 2% @ 55 Car Allow: $550/mo; Town Manager scott1:16 PM9/16/2002 ti:G1�.1W Tf •• M:JRFb�1rYJYaVWId'YMr+`� 32+.ai. '.v11 -4Ydt z: - S•aY.Wttl6sMe'4[064M4 attll,bYt1(sHiWYFLFe+L1�! T Y -"Ohi sY'iE�gHWbMN6s.+,MtlY9 COaYMYrlx`SRt XtlaSzlk:VWx^+JGR4+5VYYM, M/ . � "�i ,,,,..3'. d�,.;�°5.,,,`":�aa'v�wt' .'x,.,Ait:':,,,i .!?=t-a�am,.:- .rr. ,gs. . _, :> ,�3�i40 AwS�$i it;4 :a::41 .tz:$ ,ti:444 4r ,rfauwo rr*--''''''''''''' l . LJA, CINTC MEMORANDUM Date: September 24, 2002 To: City Council From: Jake Wager, City Mana r Re: Management Survey Enclosed is the recently completed Management Salary Survey. Of the eighteen positions surveyed, four positions are paid above the mean point _ based on salary alone. Those positions are 1) Accountant (10.8%), 2) Administrative Secretary II (21.1%, 3) Administrative Assistant to the City Manager (3.4%), 4) Information Planner (16.9%). The remaining fourteen positions are from 41.4% below the mean point (Police Chief) to 5.4% below (Deputy City Clerk/H.R. Coordinator, Police Commander). Given the current Police Chief vacancy and the soon-to-be vacated City Manager's position (8.0% below the mean point), the City Council may wish to look first at these two positions. From this point the City Council may wish to adopt a policy in terms of where r does it see the position of San Jacinto amongst the ten surveyed cities. By that 1 mean does the City wish to be at the high end of the market? The mid-point? On the bottom rung? Beyond just the salary, the City should also give some consideration to the benefit package offered. It is my opinion that the City is ' 3 ' very generous in granting four weeks vacation leave to management level employee upon commencement of employment. Many cities base the amount I 1 of vacation leave on a tiered years of service formula. Another point to consider is the granting of 96 hours of management leave. Again, this is a very generous allowance. Do these offset lower salaries? Should the Council benchmark itself at say 90% of mean (that is 10% below the middle point) while retaining the generous leave allowance? Under that scenario, eleven salaries would be adjusted, some by as little as .6% (Administrative Secretary II), while others would be adjusted upwards by 31.4% (Police Chief). The above are merely meant to be illustrative. believe with minor changes to certain positions coupled with limited resources, the City does offer a fair salary and benefit package. The challenge facing San Jacinto now is to retain quality employees while preserving its fiscal integrity. � iF i , CITY MANAGER l